Kavanagh refused everton a penalty for rodri's last minute handball at goodison, backed up by var anthony taylor and we lost the league by a point. Kavanagh is from Ashton under lyne. Taylor from wythenshawe. What is disgraceful is manchester referees constantly reffing man city games and ensuring they win. Its corrupt and has been for years. Strangely enough, Rob Jones from merseyside isnt allowed to ref liverpool games or games affecting them, yet kavanagh and taylor, both mancunians living less than 5 miles away from the emptyhad consistently are involved in city games. Corrupt.
Also I remember last year's LFC v City mishmash with Doku boot to the chest with Macca. Also LFC losing to Spurs with Diaz goal cancelled. That psychological advantage is really needed.
Liverpool had a goal ruled out last year from a free kick because Endo was offside when the ball was kicked. On the edge of the 18 yard box, and he didn't score the goal, mind you.
They also had one ruled out because Salah was push into an offside position a fraction of a second before Elliott kicked the ball to score. City are genuinely the most favoured team in the league by the officials and they don't even try to hide it.
The prem has the worst refs on the planet, if it was City playing in this game they would have got both penalties, Chelsea would have had a player sent off and their goal would have been chalked off.
Its funny how city is brought up as if they aren't currently fighting a legal battle against the league, do you really think with your brain that they would be helping them with the league when the leagues reputation is already at stake. Lets not forget about the match against arsenal when Michael Oliver took walker out of position and allowed arsenal to score. How come he didn't help city then. People like you are the reason why refs are allowed to make wrong decisions all the time its because rather than blaming the actual refs you bring it back to city
We're supposed to forget about bernardos antic before stones headed it.hats off to jurgen and Liverpool winning that title with this blatant corruption
@friendlybane I am aware of this but doesn't he back into the goalkeeper when the corner is coming in, pull out, then duck? Of course you can't be offside from a corner kick, but silva isn't the one heading the ball
Absolutely agree with the man city comments it's starting to get to the stage now where these financial payments are starting to go into referees bank accounts
The reason why Saliba got a red and Tosin got a yellow was that Saliba didn’t break any ribs. If he broke the ribs of the Bournemouth attacker like Tosin did to Jota it would’ve been a yellow.
The tables the last 5 years would argue that City do indeed need the help, without it Liverpool would have had 2 titles instead of ending a point behind. Not to mention last season where Arsenal and City both got gifts against Liverpool directly not to mention the points Liverpool were robbed of against Spurs and Brighton.
I also remember a couple of years ago when Everton wore robbed of s clear penalty the year liverpool lost the league by a point had they got it and scored city would be minus 1 of those titles.
Spot on bro...remember the season when Villa "gifted" City 3 goals within 5 mins to help them win the title. That was really an absolute disgrace by the Villa defenders. Villa were 2 goals up against City but intensionally imploded just to help an ex-Villa player win the league. That disastrous play by the then Villa defenders would surely go down in history as the world's worst performance by a Premier league club. Imagine 3 goals within 5 mins...even a 4th tier football club would not have conceded 3 goals within 5 mins. And yet Pep and his team celebrated like they won the title on merit. Definitely it was very embarassing and very shameful for the best manager in the world to celebrate winning that title which he knew his team dont deserve it. Comparing Klopp's Liverpool to Pep's City in the last 5 or 6 years, I truly believe Klopp was a better tactical manager than Pep. Klopp work within Liverpool's budget whereas Pep could anytime open up a big cheque to sign any player he wish. Liverpool's success today are the work of Klopp. And that is why Liverpool is a very well run club today.
@@BetsyBoo-j6v Very correct ...in fact Liverpool should have another 2 titles plus the one on the Villa debacle which makes it 3. Klopp should be the best manager in the world with Ancelotti on 2nd place and Pep in 3rd. Pep had a big cheque book to work on while Klopp was more frugal and had to work on Liverpool's smaller budget.
@@harrygonn934 are you going to say that wasn't a pen then? every team gets given pens for fouls like that, for example when jota dived against newcastle the year before, an even worse and more blatantly obvious dive than the one gordon did. Furthermore, if we wanna just look at the newcastle/man city game, newcastle were desercving of another pen with walker's challenge on Joelinton inside the penalty box but of course it wasn't given due to the fact that walker was wearing a man city shirt. just accept the corruption of man city mate
@@spatial09 and people were saying jota clearly dived. Gordon clearly initiates the contact by unnaturally putting his foot down whilst running to make contact with ederson. And walker was shoulder to shoulder with joelinton. Just face it, u all love to pick and choose when it comes to city by focusing on every small decision that goes for city but then ignore every decision that goes against city. Stones’ goal wouldn’t be talked about once if it wasn’t city that scored it
You and mark are a pair of daisies that don't understand the rules. Your audacity to mention any bias when this is your opinion is embarrassing. Until Stones heads the ball, Bernardo CANNOT PHYSICALLY be offside, because you cannot be offside from a corner. When Stones touches the ball, Bernardo is not impacting anything. Grow the fuck up.
Even as a united fan, city’s goal was correct to of been given. Bernardo barges the keeper when he’s onside from the corner. When stones heads the ball Bernardo is now deemed ‘offside’. He’s completely out the way and the keeper has clear sight of the ball. Take the united blinkers off mate the goal was legit.
As a Liverpool fan, I don’t even bother gettin wound up by the decisions city get anymore. I’ve realised the only way we can win in this league is to completely take it out of the refs hands, like the year we won it, and win 18 on the bounce.
What about the incident that happened 2 years ago, at Old Trafford between city and united with Rrashford and Bruno? Rashford was offside yet he didn’t interfere with play and you guys got the goal? This is the one time I am saying this, the ref is right!
Imagine being a City fan and having literally *one* incident from the last 5 years to complain about where a decision went against you. One! Meanwhile every other team in the Prem can give you multiple major decisions that went against them just this season alone.
The keeper got a bit of the ricochet off jones goes through the keeper’s legs and the keeper cleans him out. He had a tap in without getting clattered.
Yeah I honestly don't understand how anywhere else on the pitch when you take someone out even though you touched the ball first, you'll still be booked for a reckless challenge, why is this different in the box?
@@jwri95 He should at least win the ball, he didn't, merely touching it isn't 'gaining possession', otherwise all tackles regardless of how bad would be fine, cuz 'where's the tackler supposed to go?'
The last touch was from Jones after the keeper got a touch on it how on earth can anyone say it wasn’t a penalty is crazy…..the keeper clattering Jones is a penalty this bullshit about a clash was going to happen yeah he was out of fucking control that’s why 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@jwri95 he has to think about that before making the challenge like every other player on the pitch does. Just getting the ball first is Nora get out of jail free card.
Liverpool fan who hates city as much as anyone. You have to remember that Bernardo wasn’t in an offside position UNTIL Stones plays the ball. Before that the ball is coming in from a corner, so Bernardo wasn’t offside at the time he interfered with the play.
Agreed though he was challenging the keeper with the ball nowhere near in sight, stays within the area, ducks out when stones heads it in precisely to not be interfering. This is a tactic used by Arsenal to great effect too 😅
Not sure which way the ref was looking for most of the game. Yellow cards like snow for Liverpool players, I thought Chelsea players would have to mow down Arne Slot with a Kalashnikov to even get a stern warning. A joke, but not a funny one 😡😡😡
big difference under slot is they are more tactical in their play and the defense is soo tight, they take way less risks in attack as they did under klopp which allows them to see out the game in a more boring fashion then under klopp who just kept going forward and would concede quite a lot of goals and pressure on trents position in recent years
Goldbridge watched a different game than I did if he said Liverpool's penalty was soft. It's the clearest penalty all weekend, Jones turns to have a shot, is kicked in the foot which stops him having the shot and the defender doesn't touch the ball. Absolutely lunacy to even consider calling it soft!
You can’t be offside from a corner, so he was able to back into the keeper. He only becomes offside once stones makes contact with the ball. When that happened, silva had backed away and had ducked… however I do agree with the sentiment regarding city and their favourable decisions. Also the refs are very inconsistent
When they showed the ref the video of the incident of the corner, they only showed him the header from the front view. They never showed it from the side view.
I agree with you here, 100%! The level of refereeing in the Premiership is abysmal! No consistency and they can’t interpret the rules even with a VAR review!
Let us not forget the disgrace at Spurs last season and “ that” disallowed ( by Howard Webbs VAR geniuses ) goal by Diaz and LFC being reduced to 9 men by laughable refereeing.
At the end of the day I think that you can argue that every decision was the right one. Tosin’s foul could be a yellow as either him or Colwill would have probably caught Jota before the box, the second pen isn’t really a pen and there is no offside on Chelsea’s goal. But where is the consistency, the day before Saliba is redcarded by the VAR, now the VAR says it isn’t obvious but is the second pen given by the ref an obvious mistake? Not to sure
that second pen was more of a pen than the first ,that goalie was reckless ,in the middle of the pitch its a foul and a booking even if he touches the ball
I get what he said cuz I watched that game, it did look like Bernardo did obstruct Jose Sa’s view. In my opinion it should have been ruled out having Man City draw but I don’t know.
I hate the pgmol as much as the next guy but I think the got the city one right, when Bernardo nudged him he was actually in and onside position and when stones heads it he’s out of the way
The thing with the City goal is when Silva is standing in front of the keeper he's not offside, when he backs in to him is it a foul? No. You could maybe argue it's obstruction but it's not a foul and Silva doesn't have to move away from Sa, he's allowed to stand there. Then he moves out of the way and ducks, he only becomes offside once Stones heads it by which point Silva is well out of the way. I would've preferred it was ruled out but I think it's a goal, it's clever but not against the rules.
How is he offside ? You can't be offside from a corner, the only time he's offside is when it has come off stones head and he wasn't even touching him at that point 👀
Liverpool fan here . How is Bernardo in an offside position when it’s a corner ? The only way it’s interfering is if he barges into the keeper at the time of the header and he’s not .
Bernardo isn't in an offside position while duelling with the keeper. He's only offside after Stones heads the ball at which point he's ducking out the way.
Keeper wasn’t looking at Silva at all during the play, matter of fact Silva even moved out of the way and crouched to make himself smaller, it’s a risky decision but definitely not indicative of anything else, just banter atp
I mean if you want to talk about consistency, the Wolves goal WAS different, you can watch it back if you like. So it's not ridiculous to allow the City one to stand.
The city goal was definitely not a clear and obvious error so why did var get involved. Then the Arsenal sending off and the Chelsea player not, it’s just the refs giving the decision to city even when they aren’t playing
The fact that hundreds of thousands of fans see this week in week out and the only person getting paid for it, gets it WRONG , you know the refs have a HUGE problem
Getting a touch on the ball before wiping an opponent out hasnt been in the laws for years. Apart from when Curtis was sent off against spurs last season when his momentum took him into the spurs player, another VAR decision against LFC. I wonder when the PGMOL will apologise this time 🤔
Can i just say howard webb dunking custard creams with gary is not a disgrace. You cannot be offside before a header is made....thats the rule.if its a foul then fine but he cannot be offside
As you said mark. Bernardo barges into the keeper before the header, hence it’s a new phase of play and the barge is irrelevant. I am a Liverpool fan but I’m so fed up of this crying from mark and the Arsenal lot.
You're clouded by your bias. There was nothing wrong with that city goal and I'm a Chelsea fan. Also how nobody is mentioned Sancho getting stamped on and swiped down by Trent in the box is crazy. Clearest penalty out of all of them and it wasn't given.
if my beloved reds play like that against manchester city and arsenal, those matches will be over by half-time, and city and the gunners will sub off their stars for the reserves to coast to three points.
Sanchez gets the ball, but he doesn't clear the ball, the ball goes behind him and Curtis doesn't get to the ball only because Sanchez smashes him. It seems the rules are that if you touch the ball, you can kill the opponent. Another masterpiece from Oliver, red card not given, penalty overturned (I thought they were doing it when there is a clear mistake, this situation is at least 50/50). Another season, referees are killing City's contenders and are pushing City every chance they have.
Normally I’d agree with you about the reffs but that city goal should stand. He’s in an onside position when the corners taken as he’s behind the ball. The only part of that play that matters is the instant it leaves stones head and gets played forward. At that point he’s out of the keepers line of sight and practically on the deck. Shit situation but I think technically it’s a goal.
Honestly Mark, they do treat us like imbeciles but that doesn’t stop us watching the games day after day, week after week, month after month, year after year
Not sure what you're smoking here, Mark. Must be the same stuff the refs and VAR and all the other pundits that are saying about the Jones pen shout against the keeper, but that's as stone wall of a pen you'll see. Doesn't matter if he's "got a bit of the ball". He's absolutely slaughtered Jones there, and not only that, he's been nutmegged, which is something no one mentioned. If the keeper doesn't clean him out, he's rounding him for a tap in.
Where is Goldbridge's consistency, such biasness. Saying "it does not matter so long as you get the ball first" When it was an obvious Liverpool penalty. But last season when United were away at City and Ederson made a tackle and clearly got the ball vs United he is whining about it being a penalty and mocking folks who were saying it was not a penalty becos he got the ball.
Mark you’re losing credibility here complaining about that city goal. As a Liverpool fan that’s a clear cut goal. Wasn’t anywhere near his field of vision
Y’all acting like Jota didn’t pull Tosin’s shirt making Tosin fall on Top of Him Yh tactical that’s what an attacking player would do but never cut off the point Jota pulling Tosin’s shirt
"he gets the ball" you're literally watching the game 🤣 he doesn't get the ball, he takes the player out, Jota puts the ball through his legs, there's a slight touch on the underside of the goalkeepers leg but not enough to say he got the ball FFS, the ball continues in the same direction and Jones can't apply the finish because he's taken him out!! If he makes enough contact with ball, the ball should change direction but it doesn't! It's a penalty all day, reckless, dangerous and just the wrong decision from the keeper to come flying out like that! Remember what happened to VVD when Pickford did something similar?! If Jones leg is planted that's a bad injury for Jones. He does a summersault too and almost lands on his head 🤣
I agree. Also a Liverpool fan, and the reason why I think it's fine is that B Silva isn't offside until Stones makes contact with the ball as it's from a corner. Once the contact is made, Silva is ducking and out of the way. He isn't blocking the view of the gk and the ball doesn't go anywhere near him so goal should stand
@sami-yw7rq if you read my original comment, he is onside in that position. That second is very important because silva realises he's going to be offside so stops making any contact with the keeper, and moves away from him and attempts to move out of his eyesight
![ตีสิบเดย์ [FULL] | เปิดใจ "อาจารย์ เบียร์ ฅนตื่นธรรม" นักสนทนาธรรมสายดุดัน!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vqaBI_mnoDk/mqdefault.jpg)
A.Slot has won 10 out of his 11 first games, he`s giving the fans real hope
Yeah real hope ! As if you’ve not been one of best teams in Europe for 7 years straight u melt
@@swampy9550easy there lad 😆 chill out man...
@@swampy9550not really, a few of those seasons have been horrid for us
@@swampy95507 years straight is a bit of a stretch, isn't it?
@@swampy9550Liverpool havent seriously challenged for anything outside of domestic cups for 3 years.
Gary Neville is just a yes man for SKY and the FA
Money money money
He's been /and is, an irrelevance!
Kavanagh refused everton a penalty for rodri's last minute handball at goodison, backed up by var anthony taylor and we lost the league by a point. Kavanagh is from Ashton under lyne. Taylor from wythenshawe. What is disgraceful is manchester referees constantly reffing man city games and ensuring they win. Its corrupt and has been for years. Strangely enough, Rob Jones from merseyside isnt allowed to ref liverpool games or games affecting them, yet kavanagh and taylor, both mancunians living less than 5 miles away from the emptyhad consistently are involved in city games. Corrupt.
Not to mention that Kavanagh's brother in law is a Man City season ticket holder
Also I remember last year's LFC v City mishmash with Doku boot to the chest with Macca. Also LFC losing to Spurs with Diaz goal cancelled. That psychological advantage is really needed.
Liverpool had a goal ruled out last year from a free kick because Endo was offside when the ball was kicked. On the edge of the 18 yard box, and he didn't score the goal, mind you.
Chelsea in the Carabao Cup final I believe.
Which was a perfectly good goal
Liverpool had a goal ruled out last year that was fucking categorically onside, mind you.
Same Ref as city match
They also had one ruled out because Salah was push into an offside position a fraction of a second before Elliott kicked the ball to score. City are genuinely the most favoured team in the league by the officials and they don't even try to hide it.
The prem has the worst refs on the planet, if it was City playing in this game they would have got both penalties, Chelsea would have had a player sent off and their goal would have been chalked off.
Its funny how city is brought up as if they aren't currently fighting a legal battle against the league, do you really think with your brain that they would be helping them with the league when the leagues reputation is already at stake. Lets not forget about the match against arsenal when Michael Oliver took walker out of position and allowed arsenal to score. How come he didn't help city then. People like you are the reason why refs are allowed to make wrong decisions all the time its because rather than blaming the actual refs you bring it back to city
@@Speedshorts5312 It's funny how plastic City fans always have the blinkers on.
cmon la liga refs do rival the prem in poor quality
@@roberthindle3175 Expected response nothing new , no argument. Type of clowns we have watching football
You’d think you guys would stop watching since you cry every single week. Plenty of leagues to watch
6:29 penalty given to liverpool
8:15 mo salah liverpool 1-chelsea 0
12:12 JACKson liverpool 1-chelsea 1
14:11 curtis jones liverpool 2-chelsea 1
I get two 15 sec ads at every timestamp ffs
Edit, thanks for correcting. 8:15 mo salah iverpool 1-chelsea 0
JAACKSSON
JAXXsann
We're supposed to forget about bernardos antic before stones headed it.hats off to jurgen and Liverpool winning that title with this blatant corruption
should you forgot about when arsenal did the same vs ederson twice?
@@mrfanta7841 fuck arsenal
@@mrfanta7841they weren't offside though?
@@bronzy9826 you can't be offside from a corner kick. Maybe try to learn the rules of football first before opening your mouth.
@friendlybane I am aware of this but doesn't he back into the goalkeeper when the corner is coming in, pull out, then duck? Of course you can't be offside from a corner kick, but silva isn't the one heading the ball
Jesus, the match official for the match should be taken off the list, some of worst officiating in a game, the man was horrendous
How many yellow cards??
@@fayesouthall6604how many shoulder to shoulder fouls given😂 refs are disastrous
Absolutely agree with the man city comments it's starting to get to the stage now where these financial payments are starting to go into referees bank accounts
YOU ARE A MAD NAN! DELUDED TO THE CORE!YOU ARE JUST LIKE THIS SCREAMING FOOL HERE!
The reason why Saliba got a red and Tosin got a yellow was that Saliba didn’t break any ribs. If he broke the ribs of the Bournemouth attacker like Tosin did to Jota it would’ve been a yellow.
Exactly 👍
I had to read that three times! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Broke my leg reading that
Respect Mark for speaking facts... it's a bit sad that the mafia is still doing funny bussiness behind the scenes....
The refs are giving the pl to city this year also. Pl is a joke !
Same as every other season. No wonder klopp left this shit show of league
Parody is best for business. But hey, keep being delusional.
Tell me how stones’ goal wasn’t legal?
@@stevenosullivan187how wasn’t stones’ goal legal?
@@harrygonn934Bernardo Silva interfering with the play in an offside position
liverpool are the only honest big club left
Liverpool will get Honest trophy at the end
@@magicmystery4211 lol
They are also the only murderous club left
I’m a Liverpool fan but this isn’t true, you’ve also got Arsenal and United
@@DTasker95united had the refs in there back pocket the whole time of fergies reign
The tables the last 5 years would argue that City do indeed need the help, without it Liverpool would have had 2 titles instead of ending a point behind. Not to mention last season where Arsenal and City both got gifts against Liverpool directly not to mention the points Liverpool were robbed of against Spurs and Brighton.
Liverpool getting shafted as usual
I also remember a couple of years ago when Everton wore robbed of s clear penalty the year liverpool lost the league by a point had they got it and scored city would be minus 1 of those titles.
Spot on bro...remember the season when Villa "gifted" City 3 goals within 5 mins to help them win the title. That was really an absolute disgrace by the Villa defenders. Villa were 2 goals up against City but intensionally imploded just to help an ex-Villa player win the league. That disastrous play by the then Villa defenders would surely go down in history as the world's worst performance by a Premier league club. Imagine 3 goals within 5 mins...even a 4th tier football club would not have conceded 3 goals within 5 mins. And yet Pep and his team celebrated like they won the title on merit. Definitely it was very embarassing and very shameful for the best manager in the world to celebrate winning that title which he knew his team dont deserve it. Comparing Klopp's Liverpool to Pep's City in the last 5 or 6 years, I truly believe Klopp was a better tactical manager than Pep. Klopp work within Liverpool's budget whereas Pep could anytime open up a big cheque to sign any player he wish. Liverpool's success today are the work of Klopp. And that is why Liverpool is a very well run club today.
@@BetsyBoo-j6v Very correct ...in fact Liverpool should have another 2 titles plus the one on the Villa debacle which makes it 3. Klopp should be the best manager in the world with Ancelotti on 2nd place and Pep in 3rd. Pep had a big cheque book to work on while Klopp was more frugal and had to work on Liverpool's smaller budget.
Tyrone Mings was shocking in that game @@peteryong2391
Has a VAR intervention ever, ever, cost city points ?
cost them the champions league semi final when aguero was ruled off after sterling scored.
@@KarisMatic-dg3uz I'll give you that but we're talking English prem here.
@@KarisMatic-dg3uz They shouldn't of even bin in Europe due to cheating haha look it up
@@KarisMatic-dg3uzkey word points,meaning the league
@@KarisMatic-dg3uzYes but apart from that. When has VAR ever done anything against City? 😂😂
City + refs, it’s always a handicap for anyone challenging for a title.
How wasn’t it a goal? Were u crying about refs when Gordon dived for a pen when city played Newcastle???
@@harrygonn934 are you going to say that wasn't a pen then? every team gets given pens for fouls like that, for example when jota dived against newcastle the year before, an even worse and more blatantly obvious dive than the one gordon did. Furthermore, if we wanna just look at the newcastle/man city game, newcastle were desercving of another pen with walker's challenge on Joelinton inside the penalty box but of course it wasn't given due to the fact that walker was wearing a man city shirt. just accept the corruption of man city mate
@@spatial09 and people were saying jota clearly dived. Gordon clearly initiates the contact by unnaturally putting his foot down whilst running to make contact with ederson. And walker was shoulder to shoulder with joelinton. Just face it, u all love to pick and choose when it comes to city by focusing on every small decision that goes for city but then ignore every decision that goes against city. Stones’ goal wouldn’t be talked about once if it wasn’t city that scored it
City gets all the desicions for them, when Arsenal and Liverpool get dodgy desicions every week.
Spot on with the City decision, Mark.
Scripted bollocks.
You and mark are a pair of daisies that don't understand the rules. Your audacity to mention any bias when this is your opinion is embarrassing.
Until Stones heads the ball, Bernardo CANNOT PHYSICALLY be offside, because you cannot be offside from a corner. When Stones touches the ball, Bernardo is not impacting anything.
Grow the fuck up.
Curtis called for the cross from Salah man it was brilliant
Again pundits and other fans will say liverpool hasn't been tested yet .do liverpool now need to go un beaten all season to qualify.
Best clip Ive ever watched was the Goldbridge coverage of Liverpool Vs Man Uts 7-0 No,No,No No :)
During the rant at the start, just replace the word “City” with “United” and this is literally football fans moaning in the 90s.
Now UTD FANS know the exact same way everyother PREMIER LEAGUE FANS did when FERGIE had the REF'S in his pocket..
Even as a united fan, city’s goal was correct to of been given. Bernardo barges the keeper when he’s onside from the corner. When stones heads the ball Bernardo is now deemed ‘offside’. He’s completely out the way and the keeper has clear sight of the ball.
Take the united blinkers off mate the goal was legit.
As a Liverpool fan, I don’t even bother gettin wound up by the decisions city get anymore. I’ve realised the only way we can win in this league is to completely take it out of the refs hands, like the year we won it, and win 18 on the bounce.
Jones are amazing today 👏👏👏 im happy up the reds thanks mark
is* and yes! COYR 🔥🔥🔥
@@sonic.gardenwas*
Its called corruption and if that was any other team other that city its no goal. FACT league is a absolute joke
City scored in Sir Alex time.
Huge difference between the red for Arsenal and the yellow for Chelsea
Great to see Mark talking facts at the start 👏
Rules for City and rules for everyone else
Yeah, the City goal call was incredibly incredibly bad.
Cant rule that one goal out when Tottenham have conceded double figures with people pushing Vicario
The 2nd penalty deffo was. Shove into the back either risk breaking both yours and the keepers legs? No wonder he didn't challenge for the ball
8:15 liverpool 1-0
12:12 liverpool 1-1
14:13 liverpool 2-1
Thanks mate
What about the incident that happened 2 years ago, at Old Trafford between city and united with Rrashford and Bruno? Rashford was offside yet he didn’t interfere with play and you guys got the goal? This is the one time I am saying this, the ref is right!
Sorry that doesn't fit the anti city agenda. You can't apply logic to this fanbase and expect results
I dont think rashford backed into the keeper tho making him active
Imagine being a City fan and having literally *one* incident from the last 5 years to complain about where a decision went against you.
One!
Meanwhile every other team in the Prem can give you multiple major decisions that went against them just this season alone.
@@IAmPetekachuThat conversation doesn't belong here though, the decision at wolves was correct. That's it.
The keeper got a bit of the ricochet off jones goes through the keeper’s legs and the keeper cleans him out. He had a tap in without getting clattered.
Yeah I honestly don't understand how anywhere else on the pitch when you take someone out even though you touched the ball first, you'll still be booked for a reckless challenge, why is this different in the box?
Please explain where the keeper was meant to go after winning the ball? Should he just vanish into thin air?
@@jwri95 He should at least win the ball, he didn't, merely touching it isn't 'gaining possession', otherwise all tackles regardless of how bad would be fine, cuz 'where's the tackler supposed to go?'
The last touch was from Jones after the keeper got a touch on it how on earth can anyone say it wasn’t a penalty is crazy…..the keeper clattering Jones is a penalty this bullshit about a clash was going to happen yeah he was out of fucking control that’s why 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@jwri95 he has to think about that before making the challenge like every other player on the pitch does. Just getting the ball first is Nora get out of jail free card.
You are spot on it is so clear how favoured Man City are. It happens every game.
Liverpool fan who hates city as much as anyone. You have to remember that Bernardo wasn’t in an offside position UNTIL Stones plays the ball. Before that the ball is coming in from a corner, so Bernardo wasn’t offside at the time he interfered with the play.
Agreed though he was challenging the keeper with the ball nowhere near in sight, stays within the area, ducks out when stones heads it in precisely to not be interfering. This is a tactic used by Arsenal to great effect too 😅
Not sure which way the ref was looking for most of the game. Yellow cards like snow for Liverpool players, I thought Chelsea players would have to mow down Arne Slot with a Kalashnikov to even get a stern warning. A joke, but not a funny one 😡😡😡
dont know how colwill and caceido never got booked considering some of them liverpool bookings
big difference under slot is they are more tactical in their play and the defense is soo tight, they take way less risks in attack as they did under klopp which allows them to see out the game in a more boring fashion then under klopp who just kept going forward and would concede quite a lot of goals and pressure on trents position in recent years
Goldbridge watched a different game than I did if he said Liverpool's penalty was soft. It's the clearest penalty all weekend, Jones turns to have a shot, is kicked in the foot which stops him having the shot and the defender doesn't touch the ball. Absolutely lunacy to even consider calling it soft!
Another great show, spot on as always
You can’t be offside from a corner, so he was able to back into the keeper. He only becomes offside once stones makes contact with the ball. When that happened, silva had backed away and had ducked… however I do agree with the sentiment regarding city and their favourable decisions. Also the refs are very inconsistent
Arsenal get away with the exact same antics
He wasn't offside then but when stones head the ball silva became offside
Endo had a goal ruled out for offside in the cup final last year for the same thing. The refs make it up as they go along.
This guy clapping 👏🏿 when Liverpool didn’t get a penalty is hilarious 😂😂😂
As an LFC fan from Liverpool, your channel is a breath of fresh air and so funny. The PGMOL and City's owners are a disgrace,
If that was a red card yesterday it should be one today sigh
As a liverpool fan I'm glad the ref didn't give the red,it would've completely change the game in a bad way
When they showed the ref the video of the incident of the corner, they only showed him the header from the front view. They never showed it from the side view.
I agree with you here, 100%!
The level of refereeing in the Premiership is abysmal! No consistency and they can’t interpret the rules even with a VAR review!
Let us not forget the disgrace at Spurs last season and “ that” disallowed ( by Howard Webbs VAR geniuses ) goal by Diaz and LFC being reduced to 9 men by laughable refereeing.
At the end of the day I think that you can argue that every decision was the right one. Tosin’s foul could be a yellow as either him or Colwill would have probably caught Jota before the box, the second pen isn’t really a pen and there is no offside on Chelsea’s goal. But where is the consistency, the day before Saliba is redcarded by the VAR, now the VAR says it isn’t obvious but is the second pen given by the ref an obvious mistake? Not to sure
that second pen was more of a pen than the first ,that goalie was reckless ,in the middle of the pitch its a foul and a booking even if he touches the ball
Plus he’s in his area and why isn’t he challenging with his hands not his feet def penalty
The linesman you’re calling old is Darren Cann who officiated in over 500 premier league matches
I get what he said cuz I watched that game, it did look like Bernardo did obstruct Jose Sa’s view. In my opinion it should have been ruled out having Man City draw but I don’t know.
I hate the pgmol as much as the next guy but I think the got the city one right, when Bernardo nudged him he was actually in and onside position and when stones heads it he’s out of the way
No one talking about the free kick wolves should've had just before that corner anyway
Finally, someone else who saw that
The thing with the City goal is when Silva is standing in front of the keeper he's not offside, when he backs in to him is it a foul? No. You could maybe argue it's obstruction but it's not a foul and Silva doesn't have to move away from Sa, he's allowed to stand there. Then he moves out of the way and ducks, he only becomes offside once Stones heads it by which point Silva is well out of the way. I would've preferred it was ruled out but I think it's a goal, it's clever but not against the rules.
How is he offside ? You can't be offside from a corner, the only time he's offside is when it has come off stones head and he wasn't even touching him at that point 👀
Wanted to hear MG's reaction to the Robertson tackle/block at the end.
One of the first times I've ever seen the ref go to the monitor and not overturn it
Last year Macalister should have had a penalty at the end of the Anfield encounter and the ref bottled it.
Liverpool fan here . How is Bernardo in an offside position when it’s a corner ? The only way it’s interfering is if he barges into the keeper at the time of the header and he’s not .
No reaction to the Darwin slot meltdown???
Mark, i did not see the Jota potential DOGSO at the time, but you're right, where's the consistency?
Spot on mark . How the hell is that a goal PL bought and paid for
Bernardo isn't in an offside position while duelling with the keeper. He's only offside after Stones heads the ball at which point he's ducking out the way.
the main problem is no TV pundit says what they see, only the watching viewer... MOTD2 with Benitez said it was fine/totally different.
Marks a secret Liverpool fan
12:07 100% agree, He was interfering with play. I don't agree that the first penalty was a soft one.
Keeper wasn’t looking at Silva at all during the play, matter of fact Silva even moved out of the way and crouched to make himself smaller, it’s a risky decision but definitely not indicative of anything else, just banter atp
Curtis Jones Underrated to fill in Mac Allister's shoes.
So here is the point.. bernado silva is not in an offside position till the ball touches stones head. So whatever he did till then counts as fairplay
Thought there might be a reaction to the nunez's shoulder to shoulder where the ref blew the whistle. Want to know what Mark's thoughts on it are...
I mean if you want to talk about consistency, the Wolves goal WAS different, you can watch it back if you like. So it's not ridiculous to allow the City one to stand.
I remember UTD having the same fortune in Fergies days.
I’m a Liverpool fan and I think the decision is correct just look at the GK reaction he doesn’t think was a foul.
The city goal was definitely not a clear and obvious error so why did var get involved.
Then the Arsenal sending off and the Chelsea player not, it’s just the refs giving the decision to city even when they aren’t playing
VAR deliberately dudnt ahow the whole play. Whether or not it was right or wrong, let the ref see the whole thing ffs
The fact that hundreds of thousands of fans see this week in week out and the only person getting paid for it, gets it WRONG , you know the refs have a HUGE problem
Getting a touch on the ball before wiping an opponent out hasnt been in the laws for years.
Apart from when Curtis was sent off against spurs last season when his momentum took him into the spurs
player, another VAR decision against LFC.
I wonder when the PGMOL will apologise this time 🤔
Can i just say howard webb dunking custard creams with gary is not a disgrace.
You cannot be offside before a header is made....thats the rule.if its a foul then fine but he cannot be offside
As you said mark. Bernardo barges into the keeper before the header, hence it’s a new phase of play and the barge is irrelevant.
I am a Liverpool fan but I’m so fed up of this crying from mark and the Arsenal lot.
Arsenal did it twice against City and there are no whining from Mark
The trouble is you don’t know the rules Goldbridge… he cannot be offside before Stones touches the ball.
You're clouded by your bias. There was nothing wrong with that city goal and I'm a Chelsea fan. Also how nobody is mentioned Sancho getting stamped on and swiped down by Trent in the box is crazy. Clearest penalty out of all of them and it wasn't given.
if my beloved reds play like that against manchester city and arsenal, those matches will be over by half-time, and city and the gunners will sub off their stars for the reserves to coast to three points.
agree totally mate
Sanchez gets the ball, but he doesn't clear the ball, the ball goes behind him and Curtis doesn't get to the ball only because Sanchez smashes him. It seems the rules are that if you touch the ball, you can kill the opponent. Another masterpiece from Oliver, red card not given, penalty overturned (I thought they were doing it when there is a clear mistake, this situation is at least 50/50). Another season, referees are killing City's contenders and are pushing City every chance they have.
Normally I’d agree with you about the reffs but that city goal should stand. He’s in an onside position when the corners taken as he’s behind the ball. The only part of that play that matters is the instant it leaves stones head and gets played forward. At that point he’s out of the keepers line of sight and practically on the deck. Shit situation but I think technically it’s a goal.
"he's already given one shoft one, he can't give another"
Honestly Mark, they do treat us like imbeciles but that doesn’t stop us watching the games day after day, week after week, month after month, year after year
Love seeing this man cry about everything 😅😅😅
Not sure what you're smoking here, Mark. Must be the same stuff the refs and VAR and all the other pundits that are saying about the Jones pen shout against the keeper, but that's as stone wall of a pen you'll see. Doesn't matter if he's "got a bit of the ball". He's absolutely slaughtered Jones there, and not only that, he's been nutmegged, which is something no one mentioned. If the keeper doesn't clean him out, he's rounding him for a tap in.
Was I the only one who was fuming at the handball in the opening minutes
Where is Goldbridge's consistency, such biasness. Saying "it does not matter so long as you get the ball first" When it was an obvious Liverpool penalty. But last season when United were away at City and Ederson made a tackle and clearly got the ball vs United he is whining about it being a penalty and mocking folks who were saying it was not a penalty becos he got the ball.
Mark you’re losing credibility here complaining about that city goal. As a Liverpool fan that’s a clear cut goal. Wasn’t anywhere near his field of vision
No
The point is they always get the call. If this had happened to any other team they’re never getting the call.
Nothing goes against City you do realise that ???
It's not the moving out of the way it's pushing the keeper whilst the ball is out of play and coming in. It's dirty.
you're completely missing the point. But sure
Y’all acting like Jota didn’t pull Tosin’s shirt making Tosin fall on Top of Him
Yh tactical that’s what an attacking player would do but never cut off the point Jota pulling Tosin’s shirt
Preach Mark
"he gets the ball" you're literally watching the game 🤣 he doesn't get the ball, he takes the player out, Jota puts the ball through his legs, there's a slight touch on the underside of the goalkeepers leg but not enough to say he got the ball FFS, the ball continues in the same direction and Jones can't apply the finish because he's taken him out!! If he makes enough contact with ball, the ball should change direction but it doesn't! It's a penalty all day, reckless, dangerous and just the wrong decision from the keeper to come flying out like that! Remember what happened to VVD when Pickford did something similar?! If Jones leg is planted that's a bad injury for Jones. He does a summersault too and almost lands on his head 🤣
I think he lost his mind at this point. As a Liverpool fan I say clean goal for City.
I agree. Also a Liverpool fan, and the reason why I think it's fine is that B Silva isn't offside until Stones makes contact with the ball as it's from a corner. Once the contact is made, Silva is ducking and out of the way. He isn't blocking the view of the gk and the ball doesn't go anywhere near him so goal should stand
Also a Liverpool fan, you’re both clueless and have never played football in your life
@@sami-yw7rq and yet doesn't to say where I'm wrong. Laws of the game, he hasbt interfered in an offside position
@@gabrielgullidge2701 he literally backs into the goalkeeper less than a second before they score
@sami-yw7rq if you read my original comment, he is onside in that position. That second is very important because silva realises he's going to be offside so stops making any contact with the keeper, and moves away from him and attempts to move out of his eyesight
The commentators are in with the League official s