Nucleophilic Addition Reaction Mechanism, Grignard Reagent, NaBH4, LiAlH4, Imine, Enamine, Reduction

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ส.ค. 2024
  • This organic chemistry video tutorial focuses the mechanism of nucleophilic addition reaction to aldehydes and ketones. This video contains plenty of examples and practice problems using grignard reagents, NaBH4, LiAlH4, DIBAl, and amines.
    Here is a list of topic:
    1. Nucleophilic Addition Reaction Mechanism
    2. Grignard Reagent Synthesis Reaction Mechanism With Aldehydes and Ketones
    3. Grignard Reagent With Esters, CO2, and Ethylene Oxide / Epoxide
    4. Reduction of Aldehydes, Ketones, Esters, and Acid Chlorides with NaBH4 and LiAlH4
    5. NaBH4 Reaction Mechanism
    6. LiAlH4 Reduction Mechanism - Hydride Ion Transfer
    7. Cyanohydrin Formation Reaction Mechanism
    8. Dibal Reaction - Synthesis of Aldehydes
    9. Synthesis of Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Alcohols
    10. Imine Formation Reaction
    11. Enamine Formation Reaction Mechanism
    12. Primary vs Secondary Amines
    13. Reductive Amination - NaBH3CN
    14. Reduction of Lactones
    15. Conjugate Addition vs Direct Addition - Alpha Beta Unsaturated Ketones

ความคิดเห็น • 61

  • @TheOrganicChemistryTutor
    @TheOrganicChemistryTutor  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Final Exams and Video Playlists: www.video-tutor.net/

  • @jacksonreilly
    @jacksonreilly 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    You have literally saved me from failing an organic chemistry test. Thank the lord I saw this video, I was completely lost before

  • @raymondtebele6498
    @raymondtebele6498 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    this guy is really helpful i always watch his videos when i need a help

  • @aanishagill
    @aanishagill 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you so so much The Organic Chemistry Tutor! I watched all of the videos which helped me gain a clear and stronger foundation for Organic Chemistry 2, which helped me pass Organic Chemistry 2! I couldn’t be more grateful to have found and come across your TH-cam Channel, you helped not just me but so manyyy! Thank you for all that you do!🙏🙏

  • @naveengarg7702
    @naveengarg7702 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    It's really helpful to me and almost all doubts clearing lecture regarding organic chemistry 👍👍👍👍👍🎉🎉I found it very helpful . Thanku very much 🙏

  • @anastasiac680
    @anastasiac680 6 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I wanna like this video a 1000 times!

    • @jigyansudash5403
      @jigyansudash5403 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Put it simply u don't wanna like the video. 1 click -liked ,next click remove like ,so on ,performing this 1000 times

  • @twistidbow3594
    @twistidbow3594 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    hi, sorry if I missed something at 17:00 but my professor said you can't reduce lactone with NaBH4. The lactone is in equilibrium with its branched form which has an alcohol and a carboxylic acid. NaBH4 doesn't reduce acids. You either use LiAlH4, or dibal-H and then NaBH4.

    • @TheOrganicChemistryTutor
      @TheOrganicChemistryTutor  7 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      You're right. NaBH4 can't reduce an ester. I just made the corrections.

    • @lorisdupont2177
      @lorisdupont2177 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      see my answer on Alexandra Long's question

  • @rahulmathias8758
    @rahulmathias8758 7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Amazing video. Thanks for spending time on each equation!

  • @alexandralong5365
    @alexandralong5365 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    At 18:47, there shouldn't be a reaction when an ester reacts with NaBH4. NaBH4 is more selective than LAH, therefore it can only react with Ketone and Aldehyde. With ester and carboxylic there are no reactions when it reacts with NaBH4. However as for LAH, it can react with anything that has C=O bond. I am just making sure haha :)

    • @lorisdupont2177
      @lorisdupont2177 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hi, lactones aren't classic esters. As said in the Organic Chemistry J. Clayden book : " Some esters - lactones ,for example- cannot lie cis for steric reasons and this is one of the reasons why lactones are distinctly more reactives than esters and in many reactions behave more like ketones: lactones are quite easy to reduce with NaBH4, for example".
      So, to understand the cis configuration, you should know that esters (lactones as well) have two mesomeric forms following to the delocalization of the oxygen's lone pair. The C-O bond (in the cycle) has so a double bond trait, and so, there are cis and trans configuration. When you look at the structure of a lactone, you can see that, because of the cycle, we only see the trans configuration (oxygen is the main substituant) that is not stabilized (it is linked to orbitals overlap, hard to describe here). As lactones are not stabilized by cis configuration, they are more reactives than classic esters and so can be reduced by softer reducing agent (NaBH4).
      My professor (chemistry uni) uses the book I mentionned earlier to teach students as me, I'm so conviced that it is true. Sorry for being late :p

  • @lorisdupont2177
    @lorisdupont2177 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hi, (long text for better understanding/clarifications)
    My source is my uni teacher and his book,"Organic Chemistry, J. CLAYDEN" and I'm going to tell people some inconsistancy/ deepening about the video.
    First, as I replied to Alexandra Long, at 17:00, NaBH4 CAN reduce lactones (go check the answer below her comment).
    Secondly, you told that the reaction of nucleophilic attack by a secondary amine on a carbonyl carbon was done in more acidic conditions than for the primar amine.
    You should have talked about pH affecting the reaction/kinetics here.
    This reaction is done at a 4

  • @cidricola
    @cidricola 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Still helping so much in 2021 ty

  • @anirudhtammireddy464
    @anirudhtammireddy464 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    27:17 double bond missing top right

  • @akathir7434
    @akathir7434 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    U r grt man.... appreciation to this guy... from India 👍

  • @flip.3563
    @flip.3563 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Beautiful video

  • @Sesj02
    @Sesj02 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    got a test Monday, wish me luck!

    • @squirrel670
      @squirrel670 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      how'd it go?

    • @Sesj02
      @Sesj02 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nermina Kovacevic I passed with a 90 :)

  • @kathleenpark1943
    @kathleenpark1943 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ur videos are so good thank you

  • @RenegadeFury
    @RenegadeFury 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks a lot for this

  • @sardaralam7227
    @sardaralam7227 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you sir for this video making because i am very need

  • @jesusmrosario-claudio4104
    @jesusmrosario-claudio4104 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you once again.

  • @Joe-ml4qu
    @Joe-ml4qu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    At 3:09, if the bromine ion also has a negative charge why does it not bond to the carbon instead of the CH3? Is there a preference law/condition here?

    • @tylerschrand1834
      @tylerschrand1834 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      both are negativley charged. It woldnt be favored energetically bc there's 2 extra electrons. its like C:Mg2+:Br if that makes sense. since Mg is 2+, its stabilizing both ions.

    • @septromnation7840
      @septromnation7840 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      R- is the conjugate of alkane so it is a very very strong base hence a super strong nucleophile

  • @shaimaazad6025
    @shaimaazad6025 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you so much sir but how can I care about your video?! I want all of them.please.

  • @sarveshambavade
    @sarveshambavade 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    23:57 isn't there an additional carbon here ?,in the chain attached to benzene

  • @yashikaraghuwanshi7634
    @yashikaraghuwanshi7634 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I thought NaBH4 doesn't reduce esters? It's not strong enough.

  • @bobu5213
    @bobu5213 ปีที่แล้ว

    My book has a question saying: Give the mechanism for the synthetic conversion of Ph-CHO to Ph-CO-Ph. But this seems like an aldehyde could never become a ketone by nucleophilic addition. What am I missing I am so lost??

  • @christophemakilanko4704
    @christophemakilanko4704 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much

  • @iangabrielvictorio7196
    @iangabrielvictorio7196 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    where did the h3o came from

  • @rawanwalid15
    @rawanwalid15 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    انا بحبك يا اخي بحبك

  • @panchetawest30
    @panchetawest30 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    2:33 why the methyl group attack and not the bromide atom?

    • @emptyblank9943
      @emptyblank9943 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Peta-Gay Smith yeah,i doubt that too

    • @ShubhamSharma-be5bw
      @ShubhamSharma-be5bw 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bromide ion has noble gas configuration ,so it will not give electron
      I think this maybe the reason

    • @nicholascooper2438
      @nicholascooper2438 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Right… A bromide ion can hold a negative charge much better than a carbide ion due to it's size, making the carbide ion a much better nucleophile

    • @amosepelman3472
      @amosepelman3472 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Because that is not how a grignard reaction works. If you continue watching he explains how the methyl group has nucelophillic properties. The bromine does not attack because since bromine is a good leaving group. If it attacked it would just be replaced by the CH3 which does not hold negative charge well whereas the Bromine can hold negative charge well.

  • @Daniela-rt6el
    @Daniela-rt6el 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    why does addition of nucleophile and addition of acid are not added at the same time? Please answerrr

    • @jhansi61
      @jhansi61 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      If the acid is water, then in cases like organometallics reagents or LiAlH4,adding both water and the reagent at the same time will be problematic as water destroys the organometallic compound or with LiAlH4 giving a fast exothermic reaction. Any protic acid will behave similarly. So it is made sure that water or protic acid must not be present during the addition of any organometallic reagent or LiAlH4.So it is added at the end of the reaction. It is called work up.

  • @user-xy3ku4le7h
    @user-xy3ku4le7h 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thank you!!!

  • @arishbamemon8929
    @arishbamemon8929 ปีที่แล้ว

    For the first example why would CH3 have a negative charge when it's neutral and why would it be broken off to join cyclopentanol and not Br. Can someone explain please, it's confusing.

    • @WahPedal-h6x
      @WahPedal-h6x 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      1year gone am so sorry kid, we cant all win.🙁

    • @arishbamemon8929
      @arishbamemon8929 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@WahPedal-h6x honestly I forgot about this 😆

  • @nasramohamed2017
    @nasramohamed2017 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks a lot The Organic Tutor..Can you also use the normal symbols of carbon and hydrogen in those chains than the zigzag pattern please? It's kinda confusing 🤦

    • @ummchilesoanyways1313
      @ummchilesoanyways1313 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      that would be very time-taking , also the zig zag is the modern version of drawing the chains.

  • @abnormal_asian5320
    @abnormal_asian5320 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love you

  • @amosmomanyi8291
    @amosmomanyi8291 ปีที่แล้ว

  • @XxMyPandoraBoxXx
    @XxMyPandoraBoxXx 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    can enamine be reduced by NaBH4?

  • @uathrhsalim
    @uathrhsalim 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    7:14

  • @Sujeet_Yadav333
    @Sujeet_Yadav333 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Country

  • @yashikaraghuwanshi7634
    @yashikaraghuwanshi7634 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    00:16:50