ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
ต่อไป
เล่นอัตโนมัติ
Absolute Values in a Nutshell: GRE / GMAT Quant Explained (with official questions)The Tested Tutor
มุมมอง 58K
How to Master Distance/Rate and Work/Rate Problems in GMAT Quant?GMAT Club
มุมมอง 15K
Reason Your Way to Right Answers on Hard GMAT Math QuestionsDominate the GMAT [GMAT Focus Edition]
มุมมอง 210K
หนังตะลุงน้องเดียวลูกทุ่งวัฒนธรรม ตอน หนุกหนัดคนกับสัตว์ผลัดกันฮาเบื้องหลังหนังตะลุงน้องเดียว
มุมมอง 109K
เลือกยากจัง Ep.5 👥 #แป๋มวัดดวง #freefireแป๋มวัดดวง
มุมมอง 47K
Crushing GMAT inequalities in 1 video - Live with Aditya KumarGMAT Club
มุมมอง 144K
GMAT - How I scored above 700 on GMAT exam with 3 weeks of preparation (GMAT 700 strategy)Firm Learning
มุมมอง 467K
ABSOLUTE VALUES GMAT TIPS AND TRICKSGMAT Club
มุมมอง 22K
How to score 750+ in GMAT in 30 days || Complete study plan, Resources and Section wise tipsRohit Chillar
มุมมอง 74K
GRE Quant Ep 7: Inequalities & Absolute ValuesGRE Ninja Tutoring
มุมมอง 6K
How to Solve Mixture Questions on the GMAT? [Webinar]Crackverbal
มุมมอง 18K
Best Verbal Strategies for 700+ on the GMATGMAT Club
มุมมอง 70K
How to study for the New GMAT Focus in 2024Slowlybutshrly
มุมมอง 3.1K
Mastering the GMAT Remainder Concepts in Number System [Webinar]Crackverbal
มุมมอง 22K
Exclusive! น้องลิกก้า&น้องโรร่า มาแล้ว!! [cc] แดนแพทตี้ SS2 | EP.48 |DanPattie
มุมมอง 472K
Try the #NewWomanChallenge now! Brought to you by YouTube Shorts #LISAxNewWomanLLOUD Official
มุมมอง 8M
แข่งกระโดดสูงกับ Herobrine!!? #minecraft #พี่เก้า #มายคราฟMTR Mysterios
มุมมอง 197K
โกงการแข่งชิงแชมป์โลก #shorts #freefireZz Man
มุมมอง 798K
I am inherently good at quant and got a Q51 in an official mock. However, I did not know around 80% of the techniques used in this video. Proud to say this webinar was useful for me and I am sure would be for everyone.
If it had been the question of ‘weakening the argument’
I would have gone with your comment as the answer.😅
This man is a legend! Makes things so simple, even though my quant is already good, I learnt a lot
wish he did a couple more videos
Answer to 700 ( last question ) is both conditions are sufficient. On solving the given equation, we will get two solutions x=y or x+y=-4 (remove the mod and solve by type3).
To remove x=y solution, we need a statement to say x and y are not equal.
XY2, Y
So ultimately what is the answer ..what is the value of X+Y?
Is it -4?
Aditya you're doing God's work. I'm watching this way 2 years in the future and this is absolutely incredible. Thank you for the work you are doing.
Aditya out here dropping straight knowledge. No messing around. Well structured and concise. MVP!
Thank you so much for your feedback and support 👍
What happened to solving the q on the front of the video
Wow, I am speechless after watching Aditya’s inequalities and absolute value sessions. No one (I mean it… absolutely “No One” 😊) could have explained these topics better than him. MUST MUST WATCH, if you really want to understand these concepts !!
Wow Aditya Kumar is brilliant at breaking down and explaining complex problems.
Thanks for really breaking things down to the very basic level and making to more interesting to learn these concepts 👍
This was an amazing session, really recommend going through it
👍 Thank you for the feedback. We appreciate it as we look for ways to bring the right topics to our channel.
No side hustles, straight to the point. Awsome Aditya. Very helpful. Im struggling on accuracy of Absolute values. This is saver for me :)
Thank you so much, Aditya! Wonderful lesson! Thank you also to the GMATClub
@59:00 Type II, @1:01 Type III & Type IV @1:06 Type 5
Another gem of a video. Here is to more content from you sir! GMAT club are you listening!
I have never dreaded a topic more than this. Thank you so much for making it a cakewalk!!
Thank you! Stay tuned as Aditya Kumar is coming back on TH-cam with more such powerful sessions. Stay Subscribed!
Thank you so much Aditya. I have been struggling with Absolute Value since long. It used to haunt me like anything. You just made it approachable for me. Thanks a ton
The most important video on GMAT Quant on youtube.
In the question is x|y| > y^2 along with conditions x > 0 , x > y we can also add one more that is y < 0 bcz in the equation y is inside mode on the L.H.S and getting squared on the R.H.S where it converted into postive both the sides .
why was the 700 question cut off?
yes?
The question around minute 38, I think the question should be is x>IyI? and not is x>y. Therefore, the answer to the question should be E and not C. For the second case where the conditions are y>0 and x>y, yes the answer is C. Please correct me if I am wrong. Thank you very much for this very insightful video.
I am not sure if Aditya (the instructor in this video) is actively following the comments posted here. Perhaps it would be a good idea to post this question and your query in GMAT Club quant forum to seek feedback from the community and experts. gmatclub.com/forum/quantitative-7/
Thank you so much for this video - Aditya and GMAT club!
I've been struggling with inequalities since the beginning of my prep, and I'm so glad I found this video. FINALLY, I feel like I have an idea of how to approach these questions. How you've managed to make even this topic seem easy is beyond me.
Glad it was helpful! It's indeed a speciality of Aditya to teach complex subjects in easy and simple language. Pls don't forget to press LIKE and SUBSCRIBE!
This was brilliant. I was struggling a lot with absolute values with inequalities and found the video incredibly helpful
Great to hear! Do Subscribe to our channel.
Thanks a lot Aditya. Both Inequality and Abs value videos are very helpful and packed with concepts :).
Thank you so much for these amazing sessions on inequality and modulus!
By far the best video I have seen on this topic
@Aditya Kumar You are truly quant master. Learnt so much...Thanks a tons
It think there is mistake @38:26.......The answer will be "E" for the first question. Because the right condition we need to satisfy would be x > |y|, not just "x > y". For example, consider, x = 4 and y = -3, this makes the question true. However, we consider x = 4, y = -6, then it negates the above equation, while both cases are complying with the two options i.e. x>0 and x>y. Hence I am saying that the essential condition is x>|y|, and not x > y.
Agree was thinking the same!
Wonderful video - thank you Aditya and GMAT Club
I has alwyas been a pleasure getting into your quant sessions...just loved it..
Thank you for your kind words.
The problem in 37:55 is wrong I think.
X>|y| this should be the case.
only X>0 and X>y will not solve the equation.
Ex: X=1, Y=-2
yeah, was thinking about making a comment that there's mistake
Yes that's true but the second part is correct where 1st statem is y>0 and 2 is x>y is accurate
Yeah that's right. But while solving it he said the magnitude of x should be greater than the magnitude of y; and if we say |x| > |y|, and x>0, then it would suffice.
Aditya thank you so much. You're an amazing teacher! Made this complex topic soo soo easy and really made us understand that how incorrect rather time consuming the plug-in approach is.
Aditya is a hero
Wow.. Thank you. You make things sound so simple
37:38 - 2nd condition should be x>|y| -------> eg. nos to solve this, x=2, y=-3 ----> x|y| = 6, y^2=9, LHS
so happy i found this session! thank you aditya
Very good explanation of concept & beautiful sample questions to build the right & easy understand. Hope to have more videos like this on other topics as well.
Thank you very much! Do Subscribe to our channel to get notifications of future sessions. Upon subscribing, you will get FREE Access to our Premium GMAT Question Bank for 7 Days gmatclub.com/google_verify.php
That was mind blowing! Thank you.
amazing video. Thanks for clearing so many concepts.
Thank you so much Aditya!!! ✨
Legend in gmat quant !! Thank you !!
Super helpful, thank you!
man this was a brilliant explanation - good stuff @Aditya
Brilliant session.
Thank you Aditya, I’ve atleast watched this 4 times now!
So nice! Do also subscribe to our channel.
Pls provide solution for the last question@@gmatclub
Great teacher
Thank you! 😃
Really made things simple for me. Thanks.
Great..
Simply brliant
Really Awesome Explanation Aditya Kumar Sir ! You have great sense of explaining.
He is good but you are not Abhijeet Patel
@@poojaarora9504 who is that
@@ryankoech I just came to know him through some admission sessions.
this is such a game changer - thank you!
Fantastic class sir! But where is the last question you just mentioned at the end (700 type question)?
Had to write this...you are Bond...James Bond
WOW !
Thank you so much guys!!! This was so so helpful 🔥
Incredible. Thanks a lot!
In 43:20, why do we make the sign of the entire absolute variable be negative, and not just the variable? Meaning, if we are plugging in the variable x, wouldn't we only change the sign of the X?
sir the session was so helpful thanks a lot. awesome class
This is awesome, thank you!
You're very welcome! Don't forget to hit the subscribe button and get GMAT Tests FREE for 7 days gmatclub.com/google_verify.php
Amazing session!
Excellent teaching Aditya
Hello aditya, great work but help me umderstand why in 33:44 a and b cannot both be negative because |-2+ -3| which is |-5| is not < |-2- -3| which is |1|
perfect. thank you for great explanation
Is there some link where I could find the whole video? I would like to check the last excercise, but it seems that tha video was cut at the last part.
Unfortunately that video is not available with us anymore.
Very well explained , thanks !!!
Great video, Thanks Aditya
Glad you liked it!
These questions absolutely fried my brain lol.. but i thank you for the absolutely excellent explanation… it’s frustrating to know how absolutely useless these questions are in the real world..
Thank you so much! Amazing vid
the answer should either be E or changed question:
prompt: x|y|>y^2 ?
1. x> 0
2. x> y
you don't know if y >0. statement E.
or change question to "x|y|>y^2 ? if y > or < 0"
then answer is statement C
Correct. Nice observation
Either way y is going to be positive or 0 so c is correct
Either way y is going to be positive or 0 so c is correct
@@jaanvidaiya but based on "the prompt" is x*abs(y) > y^2 and then the info from the statements.... if y is 0 then the term is not greater, if y is greater than 0, it is.
such a great video thank you!
Thank you so much sir. Really helpful 🤗
Hello, wouldn't we need in the problem "x * IyI > power(y , 2)", the information confirming that y != 0? This is given in the second instance of the problem, where y > 0 and x > y, but not in x > 0 and x > y. Therefore, I would think the info from both last statements to be insufficient. Thank you for your time. I hope to get an answer, please.
Please mention the time stamp and we will see if that question is discussed on GMAT Club.
@@gmatclub39:06
absolutely brilliant 👍
In the question ‘what is the value of y?’ Can I directly say that 1 will give me 2 values of x coz degree is 2 which means I can’t find y directly. Moving on to 2 gives me 2 possibilities which when I check in 1 show that y will be imaginary if x is -8. Giving me my answer c and y=14. Please tell me if this is the correct way to see this?
Reach out to Aditya Kumar on LinkedIn www.linkedin.com/in/aditya-kumar-a29a6779/
hi gmat club for type 4 absolute values in 1:05:50 why not take the roots like in the case of type 3 and have x and y to be less than 0? please help. I cant seem to move forward from this
Hi Caroleg, not sure if Aditya is still following this comment thread; I think it will be more helpful if you just post your doubt in the Quant forum on GMAT Club (gmatclub.com/forum/quantitative-7/) and make sure to tag @Bunuel in your post; I am sure Bunuel and other GMAT experts on the forum will help address your question.
Thank you very much
Was the last 700 level question cut off from this video? I felt like it ended abruptly.
Thanks for the video
Our pleasure. Stay Subscribed!
@aditya kumar: can you plz upload vedios of number system?
In the type 5 example at roughly 1:14:00, why do we just have to know whether x
Could I please get the link for the inequalities webinar?
Actually, all the links mentioned? They don't show in the chat window
if u r some one who has not studied maths in 11th /12th should watch this video.
|3-y| also means y
Please take a session on time and work, time and distance
We have a session precisely on these topics today at 9:30pm IST th-cam.com/video/MpwbvpaO7kA/w-d-xo.html
9:00 Variable cancellation
14:40- Basics
49:30 - Type 1
1:01:00 - Type 2
1:08:00 - How to plug in values in sure shot way (Revise)
38:25 I have a doubt, wouldn't it be 'not sufficient' "Option E" as the conditions given doesn't clarify y>0??
i think the question was whether x is positive
can the concept of 5 types be used for multiple equations as well? In our example, we had only one inequality in which there was only one parenthesis. can we use this concept if we have more than one parenthesis? If yes, please share an example
Perhaps you should ask this in Quant forum gmatclub.com/forum/quantitative-7/
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel & Get free GMAT mock tests for 7 days.. gmatclub.com/google_verify.php
At 37:27 in the video there must be one more condition Y>0
at 30:00 should n be anything except 0?
57:33 - how to create a range
at 38:30 wouldnt answer be E?
thank you so much it s really helpful
Glad to hear that! 👍
In 38:56,
Shouldn't the answer be E instead of C?
Don't we need |x| > |y| (instead of x > y)?
If x = 2 and y = -3, then LHS is 6 and RHS is 9 : then x|y| < y^2
If x = 4 and y = -3, then LHS is 12 and RHS is 9: then x|y| > y^2
You're right! But if we know y>0 like in the second condition, then x>y will suffice.
Hi, this was a great session. However, i do have a question on the general form for greater than. I tried applying the same to the below two questions and couldn't get the correct answer:
1. |x+5| > | 3x-2|
2. |x+3| >= 4x
would highly appreciate a response on this.
this wount go on the general form. Its more of a miscellaneous as 4x is a variable. analysis will be better here
first x> -3/4 or x< 7/2, second is x
Do you offer tutoring?
I think I need help!
He does, reach him on linkedin
At time 1.15.00 hr, in that particular problem why can't we solve the equation |x-5|=5-× by considering( x-5 )can be positive or -(×-5) .
We can do it with that method, but it'll only take more time. Instead, if we think that 5-x is greater than or equal to 0, then it'll make our life much easier.
@@geetpatel5155 Thank you. Got it 👍
@@geetpatel5155 if you do by sarath method,it actually giving me x has to be either 5 or 0 only not the range,is it true?
Hey guys, I have a question linked to this one. During the whole webinar the explanation was that |x| = something, we can analyze that X => 0, but in this problem, the approach was to take the something =>0, and the results are different. Can anyone tell me why use 5-x =>0 instead of x-5 =>0. Thanks in advance.
You are incorrect for the question at 35:07 the correct answer is x > |y| for the equation x |y| > y^2
You have x > 0 and x>y
However, to prove this incorrect. Use x = 4 and y = -5
These numbers satisfy your condition of 4 > 0 and 4 > -5
The do NOT satisfy the original equation. 4 x |-5| is not greater than (-5)^2