The risks of wake turbulence have been understood for a long time, but it's fairly rare to see it demonstrated on a recording so clearly. Even though I'm pretty sure the trailing A-380 (in the second example) was never in any actual danger, I hope the airlines and regulators see this and think about whether their spacing protocols might need to be changed a bit. ... and it's probably only because of LA Flights' emphasis on heavy jets that we get to see this at all (I saw it on the live stream yesterday).
Those pilots were just getting their "moments of abject terror" out of the way early so they can cruise to Asia with 15 hour of boredom. Seriously though I'd like to have Kelsey weigh in on that, because that abrupt wing drop looked kind of concerning. Right on takeoff they're flying low and slow, so I wouldn't be surprised if it was a serious incident, but obv I'll wait for the experts to discuss it.
@@dexon777 If you read my remarks more carefully you'd notice that I said I saw the live stream yesterday. I'm not a pilot, but I do know a few things about optics and long-range photography and I can state that the perspective in a shot like that can be very deceptive. If an actual heavy-jet pilot has something to say about the apparent wake turbulence I'd be very interested. Other than that, I'll stand by what I said, which is just opinion in any event.
Time is money. Business as usual. Gotta *push them off the tarmac not more than 2 minutes* after each other, rrright... until some smaller craft hits a tower, chimney or something or just comes straight down. 🎉
Have been studying and researching on airplanes & aviation since i was a little boy. But i have never seen an A380 being affected by the wake turbulence of another A380!!🤯🤯 This was truly fascinating! Thank you for such content🙏🏻
After watching an episode of Mayday, I think this captures the amazing power of airplane wakes. I’m sure we all can agree to have the planes spaced out just a few minutes to avoid an unnecessary accident. Amazing footage LA Flights!
By definition unless a plane crashes then wake turbulence is within safe limits. Do we replace our tires the first sign of wear and thinning? Flying is so safe increased safety adds cost and pushes more poor into their cars. There was famous example of FAA saying strapping babies in own seat was safer than mom holding her, but then quarter of 1m moms would choose to drive to not pay extra $300 for ticket for baby, and this leads to more dead babies like 200 over decade in car accidents than ever saved by being saved by not being secure on flight maybe 1..... Just saying "more safety" is simplistic, why not mandate 10 minute plane separation just build more airports...... People including me should leave it to experts...
Wow I thought the title was clickbait until I saw that second Asiana get it. What a ride, you guys did a great job capturing it, thanks for your diligence and hard work!
I’m really glad that during the last wake turbulence, you had the utility pole as a reference for scale. The 380 actually dropped altitude a few times and you could see it quite clearly.
I fully expected to watch it and come back and explain it’s likely parallax error, diffraction, etc. that might explain some of it, but they definitely got tossed around and looks like they lost some lift for a bit. Not sure if they dropped, even a decrease in lift will look like a drop from that angle and distance.
Really like that you checked in before reproducing footage! That kind of courtesy between content creators is great to see.... SO much aggregation & plain ol' uncredited copying goes on in YT space unfortunately, & creators often seem to think that if they're adding something (voice over, commentary, etc) then they don't need to ask originsl posters, and/or don't even need to credit them? 😐 I always really appreciate it when I find a channel that does go the extra mile & that cites its sources properly. Kudos to both the original creators & you! 😘
I don't understand why they have these super jumbos taking off so close too each other. Their should be some time between each take off too prevent such turbulence. For example, the first two A380's were EXTREMELY close too each other while both in take off flight. I don't know if that's an LAX thing but we don't operate like that here in Boston Logan.
I guess its LA and also a big aircraft vs the same one with big controls over its wings... If theres obvious differences between size then its too dangerous
Their timing is specifically designed based on aircraft creating the wake and ones following, and all controllers follow extremely strict guidelines on this - it can be close with A380s because the wake impact is relative to the size of the aircraft flying INTO it. Even a massive A380s wake turbulence isn’t a big deal to another A380.
Among the reason: LA was busy as always and the only plane that can withstand a380 wake are the a380 itself. With back2back A380 departure, it save time and money cause they didn't have to wait after one flying. You see, if they put a smaller aircraft after an a380, there's like a 3-5 minutes buffers time before they can takeoff. With every time airlines on the ground, it cost airlines and airport Millions. You can just read Skybrary A380 wake vortex guidance.
Great shot seeing the 2 380s climbing, reminds me of the final landings of Concorde at London Heathrow, tv cameras picked up 2 Concorde's in the same shot, it was a sight that had never been seen before.
@@katrinajones8788 I get that things happen, but as a passenger I'd be pretty unhappy and worried after getting buffeted around like that (and more importantly, that close to the ground where there isn't a ton of altitude yet if something actually serious does happen).
It looks to me like they over-compensated for what they thought would be a roll to the left, and instead created their own roll to the right around 7:08, which they had to correct. The plane was never remotely close to anything dangerous, but yeah, nervous flyers probably weren't happy with that departure.
Pilots can ask for more time if they believe it's unsafe to take off. I've heard pilots tell an ATC they'd rather wait, especially after an A380/747 has departed. If I were piloting either of these planes, I would have asked for an extra minute or so to give the wake some time to calm down.
Well. If I was pilot, I'd *absolutely expect* ATC to keep things safe regarding separation *at all times, without asking* so all I can say, this is shifting blame to the pilots and obviously a little too lousy on part of the ATC... I see a bias here to keep ATC not responsible. Who else is then? 🎉
@@robadzso Yet you cant expect to always give into others judgement in any industry, if your gut instinct tells you something sounds unreasonable or unsafe. Pilots can and should push back if the situation calls for it, they are trained to do so not just there to push buttons. Complacency goes both ways.
A little background information by an ATC Trainee: there are several values how long we have to wait between departures of certain pairs: - e.g. Cessna 172 behind A380: 8NM/3 minutes - B747 behind A380: 6NM/2 minutes However, between two succeeding A380s no value is prescribed. To be honest, we don‘t understand why…
@Blue looks like they had enough spacing only need the first one to be 4 miles away before the 2nd starts departure roll and 90 seconds with a plane as powerful as an a380 should roughly get it done
In 2001 wake turbulence killed several hundred people on an AA Airbus 300 flight 587 and i thought the need for wake turbulence separation is to avoid similar accident from happening again. But here we are in 2023 watching some huge birds dangling and dancing in the air. It seems FAA controllers did not learn from flight 587
587 did not crash due to wake turbulence. It crashed because the FO violently pushed the rudder from side to side until it snapped. They did learn from it, as training manuals no longer encourage pilots to mess with the rudder to overcome the wake turbulence. As it can be seen in the video, the pilots are doing just fine by adjusting the bank angle.
As you know, the time difference between those two arriving in Korea is only within 10 minutes. It is impressive to see a Korean Air pilot rolling-take-off from Korea to match the arrival time of Asiana Thank you for the great video
That is insanely cool! I've always wondered how these two airlines battle it out in the sky since they usually always have depart in short intervals. And to actually shoot to huge planes - amazing! Thanks for this video!
I am surprised right after they pulled up the gear that the pilot just didn't veer out of the flight takeoff path that the previous heavy used just to ensure they didn't run into wake turbulence and make the flight correction once they had more sufficient altitude...the pilot had to have been expecting it.
Right! Part of me wonders if the sharp turn we saw was actually the pilot steering out of the way of the wake turbulence. We didn’t really see an equally sharp maneuver back onto the departure heading.
Why are they letting them take off that close to each other ?!? The international airport near me, makes them use alternate perpendicular runways if the take off time is that close to each other.
A380 is a wonderful machine to fly! Personally, I feel the computer righting the plane in a good position, but gently in order to remain comfortable and not to frighten the passengers. It is still acclaimed all around the globe for its unique quiet, relaxing, spacious travel experience (the straight exterior wall, maybe) My favorite plane!
That Asiana actually lost altitude it was dropping quick for a moment that’s why it made that quick right turn to get out of the vortex. For passengers it was definitely a very frightening experience I imagine because you do feel like you’re falling straight down for that moment, happened to me a few years back in Chicago
Wake turbulence is no joke. Such turbulence from A380 nearly crashed a small private jet over Indian Ocean a couple years ago. And that was on cruise altitude.
Yep. The plane rolled over several times in midair. Thankfully, it landed safety but the plane was a complete write off due to the damage and some of the passengers suffered broken ribs and head injuries.
Seeing it fall from the sky for that brief moment and turn right to escape the vortex is extremely unnerving. There’s a 3 minute rule., But then this route is a gold mine for these specific airlines, it’s unsettling to speculate what may be the obvious
Wow, that was incredible! Two Flying Whales going at each other! 😂 The tower should had Asiana waited for 3 to 5 minutes on 24L. Wake turbulence ain't no joke that's for sure but impressive fellas great catch! 🛫🛫
Awesome catch! Would you be okay with me featuring this in my series Weekly Dose of Aviation? Of course you will be credited both in the video and in the description. Thanks!
I was a Northwest Airlines Flight Attendant finishing up in the back galley of a B-757 when we hit the wake of a B747-400 going into L.A. I thought I was inside of a spin cycle! 🤮 Those stretch B757's can really get crazy in the tail section!
Im a little bit of an armchair pilot but hear me out, I don't understand how the procedure at 4:00 is allowed The Korean air A380 is on the runway taking off as the Lithuania is on final and as the Lithuania touches down as the a380 takes off. If the 747 is unstable on approach and calls a go around, wouldn't the plans be to close given the wake turbulence??
Didn’t expect to see an A380 being pushed around in wake turbulence ! If taxiways need to be cleared for super wingspans and separation increased for wake turbulence, doesn’t that mean the total number of passengers getting though the airport is fewer when these big beasts are around, despite their greater capacity ? If I was a bizjet there, I’d think twice before taking off anytime soon behind them.
While that may be cool to look at, meaning the wake turbulence, It can be really dangerous. there was a plane crash that happened not long after 911 and it was an airbus that went down in New York, it was caused by wake turbulence from a 747 and the particular plane which I believe was an airbus A310, if I'm not mistaken and the guy was hitting the rudder pedals a little bit too hard and it caused the tail section the horizontal a stabilizer to break off due to him pushing the rudder pedals beyond their limit and it caused it to crash in New York. I'm sure you guys know which one I'm talking about.
Yes, I remember that one. It was AA flight 587 and it was an A300. Many people thought it was another terrorist attack, but as you mentioned, it was the pilot overuse of the rudder to correct wake turbulence. Very unfortunate and sad incident.
Affirm, while i would say it was more of a manouvering error due to fast response provided by the pillots, still wake turbulence is a no joke. I hope they file a report and do something.
Yeah AA 587. A300 . Pilots seeme aware of the wake turbulance and that was what it was but one of them hit the rudder hard which added to the turbulance and the pilots thought it was still the wake turbulance. I guess other pilots had noted that this particular pilot was hard on the rudder but it turned out that there was an issue with the training manuel that AA put out regarding wake turbulance and using the rudder. Irony was that several people who were killed on 587 were survivors of 911 including from escaping from the attack on the WTC towers.
ASIANA A380 trying to avoid wake turbulence on takeoff by pivoting before the rotation point of the preceding aircraft and maneuvering to avoid its path. Good job 😎
The risks of wake turbulence have been understood for a long time, but it's fairly rare to see it demonstrated on a recording so clearly. Even though I'm pretty sure the trailing A-380 (in the second example) was never in any actual danger, I hope the airlines and regulators see this and think about whether their spacing protocols might need to be changed a bit.
... and it's probably only because of LA Flights' emphasis on heavy jets that we get to see this at all (I saw it on the live stream yesterday).
Those pilots were just getting their "moments of abject terror" out of the way early so they can cruise to Asia with 15 hour of boredom. Seriously though I'd like to have Kelsey weigh in on that, because that abrupt wing drop looked kind of concerning. Right on takeoff they're flying low and slow, so I wouldn't be surprised if it was a serious incident, but obv I'll wait for the experts to discuss it.
Never in actual danger? Dude did you watch the video?
@@dexon777 If you read my remarks more carefully you'd notice that I said I saw the live stream yesterday. I'm not a pilot, but I do know a few things about optics and long-range photography and I can state that the perspective in a shot like that can be very deceptive. If an actual heavy-jet pilot has something to say about the apparent wake turbulence I'd be very interested. Other than that, I'll stand by what I said, which is just opinion in any event.
Not to burst your bubble but the FAA just did a Wake Turbulence Re-categorisation, that is the decreasing of the safety space between aircraft.
"Decreasing ... the safety space...." would mean they can now fly closer to each other than previously. Is that really what you meant to say?
Incredible footage showing how powerful the wake turbulence is even for an equally large aircraft👍
I thought the Asiana was trying to do a right bank and was like why are they turning right?
The few minutes with Korean, Asiana and Lufthansa was Dreamlifter + Singapore A380 quality material. Fabulous work Peter and Joshua!
I would suggest the FAA reconsider the timing and spacing requirements of back-to-back supers taking off and trailing like that.
For real
FAA went woke, they're already broke
No joke. That's some serious turbulence -- they should be distanced much more
Time is money. Business as usual. Gotta *push them off the tarmac not more than 2 minutes* after each other, rrright... until some smaller craft hits a tower, chimney or something or just comes straight down. 🎉
Yep. Plain in sight.
Have been studying and researching on airplanes & aviation since i was a little boy.
But i have never seen an A380 being affected by the wake turbulence of another A380!!🤯🤯
This was truly fascinating!
Thank you for such content🙏🏻
That had to be a butt puckering moment for everyone on that last plane.
LOL! Interesting comment
that second turbulence is a little intense for such a behemoth.... but what a great set of quad jets - thank you!
My heart almost skipped a beat at 7:12 - 7:17
After watching an episode of Mayday, I think this captures the amazing power of airplane wakes. I’m sure we all can agree to have the planes spaced out just a few minutes to avoid an unnecessary accident. Amazing footage LA Flights!
By definition unless a plane crashes then wake turbulence is within safe limits. Do we replace our tires the first sign of wear and thinning? Flying is so safe increased safety adds cost and pushes more poor into their cars. There was famous example of FAA saying strapping babies in own seat was safer than mom holding her, but then quarter of 1m moms would choose to drive to not pay extra $300 for ticket for baby, and this leads to more dead babies like 200 over decade in car accidents than ever saved by being saved by not being secure on flight maybe 1..... Just saying "more safety" is simplistic, why not mandate 10 minute plane separation just build more airports...... People including me should leave it to experts...
You guys! That was insane! And that you were there to capture all of that. Great job - loved this!
two Supers giving WAKE TURBULENCE to each other and Pilots doing an amazing job!!
Wow I thought the title was clickbait until I saw that second Asiana get it. What a ride, you guys did a great job capturing it, thanks for your diligence and hard work!
Geez the A380s are back alright. I flew in one of them (British Airways) a few months ago, was an awesome experience!
I’m really glad that during the last wake turbulence, you had the utility pole as a reference for scale. The 380 actually dropped altitude a few times and you could see it quite clearly.
I fully expected to watch it and come back and explain it’s likely parallax error, diffraction, etc. that might explain some of it, but they definitely got tossed around and looks like they lost some lift for a bit. Not sure if they dropped, even a decrease in lift will look like a drop from that angle and distance.
I love the A380, best flight experience ever. I hope they stay in service for many many more years to come.
Et c'est Français monsieur ! 😁
@@SadSad-de2cy ...and English, Spanish etc., Sir... 🎉
Their last order happened in 2021 but they have 15 to 20 more years for them to have a retirement
@@SadSad-de2cy C'est un consortium Européen
@@marmar-90 je sais mais aucun intérêt de le préciser ici. La plupart ne comprennent rien.
Had to watch many times.
Passengers must've been thrilled.
Guys your energy is infectious! *Love L.A. Flights!!*
Stunning capture! May I feature this wake turbulence encounter in one of my next episodes? Of course with a link back to your original video. Cheers!
Yeah absolutely go ahead.
We have a whole bunch of crazy highlights you might be interested in. Dm on instagram if you like👍
@@L.A.FLIGHTS Thanks! I‘ll have a look at your other content as well 👍
Really like that you checked in before reproducing footage! That kind of courtesy between content creators is great to see....
SO much aggregation & plain ol' uncredited copying goes on in YT space unfortunately, & creators often seem to think that if they're adding something (voice over, commentary, etc) then they don't need to ask originsl posters, and/or don't even need to credit them? 😐 I always really appreciate it when I find a channel that does go the extra mile & that cites its sources properly. Kudos to both the original creators & you! 😘
Yikes! That Asiana wake encounter was scary and had to be very unsettling to the passengers. Perhaps they should have spaced them out more.
@@Deakybean181how do you know that?
I don't understand why they have these super jumbos taking off so close too each other. Their should be some time between each take off too prevent such turbulence. For example, the first two A380's were EXTREMELY close too each other while both in take off flight. I don't know if that's an LAX thing but we don't operate like that here in Boston Logan.
Because it’s La
I guess its LA and also a big aircraft vs the same one with big controls over its wings... If theres obvious differences between size then its too dangerous
Their timing is specifically designed based on aircraft creating the wake and ones following, and all controllers follow extremely strict guidelines on this - it can be close with A380s because the wake impact is relative to the size of the aircraft flying INTO it. Even a massive A380s wake turbulence isn’t a big deal to another A380.
@@EstorilEm this is wrong. Please don't spread wrong information.
Among the reason:
LA was busy as always and the only plane that can withstand a380 wake are the a380 itself. With back2back A380 departure, it save time and money cause they didn't have to wait after one flying.
You see, if they put a smaller aircraft after an a380, there's like a 3-5 minutes buffers time before they can takeoff. With every time airlines on the ground, it cost airlines and airport Millions.
You can just read Skybrary A380 wake vortex guidance.
Great shot seeing the 2 380s climbing, reminds me of the final landings of Concorde at London Heathrow, tv cameras picked up 2 Concorde's in the same shot, it was a sight that had never been seen before.
Great video Joshua as always. The 2nd pair of quad jets were intense. Way to go LA Flights
That footage at 7:00 is insane - I wonder if there will be a report on that incident. Anyway, fantastic capture Peter and Josh
Most likely there will because that was a very intense wake encounter that required lots of corrections from the pilots.
@@katrinajones8788 I get that things happen, but as a passenger I'd be pretty unhappy and worried after getting buffeted around like that (and more importantly, that close to the ground where there isn't a ton of altitude yet if something actually serious does happen).
It looks to me like they over-compensated for what they thought would be a roll to the left, and instead created their own roll to the right around 7:08, which they had to correct. The plane was never remotely close to anything dangerous, but yeah, nervous flyers probably weren't happy with that departure.
@@TomG1555 Very much agree.
@@samkass9039 the roll to the right was probably to get out of the wake turbulence as fast as possible
Totally the highlight of that day's live plane spotting. Only on LA Flights!
Pilots can ask for more time if they believe it's unsafe to take off. I've heard pilots tell an ATC they'd rather wait, especially after an A380/747 has departed. If I were piloting either of these planes, I would have asked for an extra minute or so to give the wake some time to calm down.
I agree!!
Well. If I was pilot, I'd *absolutely expect* ATC to keep things safe regarding separation *at all times, without asking* so all I can say, this is shifting blame to the pilots and obviously a little too lousy on part of the ATC... I see a bias here to keep ATC not responsible. Who else is then? 🎉
@@robadzso I agree.
@@pksmith1275 "You gotta keep em seperated" Should of played that song during the turbulence.
@@robadzso Yet you cant expect to always give into others judgement in any industry, if your gut instinct tells you something sounds unreasonable or unsafe. Pilots can and should push back if the situation calls for it, they are trained to do so not just there to push buttons. Complacency goes both ways.
I flew out of LAX in SW 737 the other day and we hit a wake. Not a huge thing, but it was pretty rapid 20 degree bank that was quickly recovered.
7:16 must've been a fun little rollercoaster ride in the back row. 🤣
I’ve sat in the rear a few times. Not bad, EXCEPT when you hit turbulence, which I hate. I would’ve passed out here. 😭
This video today shows why the "brothers" are #1 !!!
A little background information by an ATC Trainee:
there are several values how long we have to wait between departures of certain pairs:
- e.g. Cessna 172 behind A380: 8NM/3 minutes
- B747 behind A380: 6NM/2 minutes
However, between two succeeding A380s no value is prescribed.
To be honest, we don‘t understand why…
There is info on the Chicago Training Department channel that concludes it should be 3 minutes. It’s based from some studies
Judging from comments I think this is an unknown phenomenon between two Supers that wasn’t expected perhaps
Geez that turbulance at 6:58. Play the video at 2x speed and you can see the drop in comparison to the lamppost.
Perhaps not a good idea to have back to back A380 taking off? Either way , great video as always
Even worse idea would be a narrowbody aircraft taking off immediately after the super.
@Blue looks like they had enough spacing only need the first one to be 4 miles away before the 2nd starts departure roll and 90 seconds with a plane as powerful as an a380 should roughly get it done
@@joeljustin I came in to LHR after a 777 (cockpit view as an ACM) and they did not space us well
Boy oh boy. Our little 320 fought all the way down.
I agree, better put a 737 Max between them 😈
I think it’s more dangerous to let a smaller plane after those 380/747?
Pov: You're walking the Hallways at your School
It's amazing how long lived these turbulences are. They are like vortices in a big bowl you can't see.
In 2001 wake turbulence killed several hundred people on an AA Airbus 300 flight 587 and i thought the need for wake turbulence separation is to avoid similar accident from happening again. But here we are in 2023 watching some huge birds dangling and dancing in the air. It seems FAA controllers did not learn from flight 587
587 did not crash due to wake turbulence. It crashed because the FO violently pushed the rudder from side to side until it snapped. They did learn from it, as training manuals no longer encourage pilots to mess with the rudder to overcome the wake turbulence. As it can be seen in the video, the pilots are doing just fine by adjusting the bank angle.
As you know, the time difference between those two arriving in Korea is only within 10 minutes. It is impressive to see a Korean Air pilot rolling-take-off from Korea to match the arrival time of Asiana
Thank you for the great video
That is insanely cool! I've always wondered how these two airlines battle it out in the sky since they usually always have depart in short intervals. And to actually shoot to huge planes - amazing! Thanks for this video!
Can you imagine if a smaller Aircraft go thru those wakes.
Better it remains in the imagination.
@@cuckoonut1208 You are right..
Imagine a lightly loaded crj 200
My heart dropped at 7:14.
I am surprised right after they pulled up the gear that the pilot just didn't veer out of the flight takeoff path that the previous heavy used just to ensure they didn't run into wake turbulence and make the flight correction once they had more sufficient altitude...the pilot had to have been expecting it.
Right! Part of me wonders if the sharp turn we saw was actually the pilot steering out of the way of the wake turbulence. We didn’t really see an equally sharp maneuver back onto the departure heading.
You guys got some AWESOME footage right there!!! I’d have been beside myself if I was on it though!!! I didn’t even think that was a thing!!
Still amazed by that action right place right only LA FLIGHTS can do that.
A380 got a wake turbulence by another A380 💀🗿
Funny both Korean A380s taking off back to back
Omfg this is one of the best videos ive watched in a while
That was a good catch on that wake turbulence guys!
Very Cool seeing them both takeoff like that.
Why are they letting them take off that close to each other ?!? The international airport near me, makes them use alternate perpendicular runways if the take off time is that close to each other.
I love all this action!! Great job LA Flights ❤❤❤
Still crazy how the wind can blow these planes around like paper
The wind ?
Wake Turbulence Moments: 2:11 and 6:55
Second is more like 7:00
A380 is a wonderful machine to fly! Personally, I feel the computer righting the plane in a good position, but gently in order to remain comfortable and not to frighten the passengers. It is still acclaimed all around the globe for its unique quiet, relaxing, spacious travel experience (the straight exterior wall, maybe) My favorite plane!
I love 💖 Canada
That Asiana actually lost altitude it was dropping quick for a moment that’s why it made that quick right turn to get out of the vortex. For passengers it was definitely a very frightening experience I imagine because you do feel like you’re falling straight down for that moment, happened to me a few years back in Chicago
Wake turbulence is no joke. Such turbulence from A380 nearly crashed a small private jet over Indian Ocean a couple years ago. And that was on cruise altitude.
Yep. The plane rolled over several times in midair. Thankfully, it landed safety but the plane was a complete write off due to the damage and some of the passengers suffered broken ribs and head injuries.
Seeing it fall from the sky for that brief moment and turn right to escape the vortex is extremely unnerving. There’s a 3 minute rule., But then this route is a gold mine for these specific airlines, it’s unsettling to speculate what may be the obvious
Wow, that was incredible! Two Flying Whales going at each other! 😂 The tower should had Asiana waited for 3 to 5 minutes on 24L. Wake turbulence ain't no joke that's for sure but impressive fellas great catch! 🛫🛫
flights in and out in seconds at LAX. They got no time :(
Jesus Christ my heart skipped a beat watching the Asiana roll like that. I wonder what it felt like for the passengers!
Awesome catch! Would you be okay with me featuring this in my series Weekly Dose of Aviation? Of course you will be credited both in the video and in the description. Thanks!
Amazing footage!! Great work fellas!
I hope tower saw the 2 streams with the 380 wake turbulence. They’ll have to give a little more time between departures
2:15 Korean Air KE18 Wake Turbulence
6:55 Asiana Airlines OZ201 Wake Turbulence
What was the third asiana flight #
This is WILD! Thanks a lot for posting guys 😎
I would have been needing to change my trousers if I had been in the Asiana big boy.
Thanks guys, I love to watch the big planes .
They were giving the brothers from Apple Valley a goodbye wave 👋 ❤❤and to all of LA Flights
Was worth to watch till the end. amazing wake turbulance. Great capture guys. Conclusion: never take off after Heavy ;)
That pilot was probably cussing the ATC out. Dang! 😮
Korean was like:
Revenge is a dish best served cold!!! 😈
There's a good clip of a light a/c departure from Oshkosh behind a heavy, resulting in a crash. Wakes toss light planes around like a leaf.
Love to hear what the Pilots said to the Idiots at the Tower! I'd be MF ing them all the way to Korea! I hope someone will send this to FAA.
Nice 👍
Thanks for sharing
Greetings from Helsinki ❄️ Finland
my man was on the stick in that Asiana lmao bet the passengers thought they was gonna roll just that lil bit feels like a LOT in a 380
That is crazy. They really should consider increasing the separation behind those larger aircraft.
That classic oldschool Lufthansa Logo. Omg
I was a Northwest Airlines Flight Attendant finishing up in the back galley of a B-757 when we hit the wake of a B747-400 going into L.A. I thought I was inside of a spin cycle! 🤮 Those stretch B757's can really get crazy in the tail section!
"why can't you walk around the cabin until cruising altitude?"
...that's why 😂😂
Amazing footage!!! Incredible how strong that wake turbulence is!!! Thanks for sharing!!!
"This is your captain speaking! Sorry for the turbulent take off, we swerved to miss migratory birds heading north!" ......NOT.....😂
THANK YOU FOR A VERY ENTERTAINING VIDEO. MY WARMEST REGARDS FROM DEAN IN AUSTRALIA.
Im a little bit of an armchair pilot but hear me out, I don't understand how the procedure at 4:00 is allowed The Korean air A380 is on the runway taking off as the Lithuania is on final and as the Lithuania touches down as the a380 takes off. If the 747 is unstable on approach and calls a go around, wouldn't the plans be to close given the wake turbulence??
Never thought an a380 would ever experience wake turbulence 💀
That gap between korean super and lufthansa747 is so intense. I gotta goosebump to see it so close together.
Why didn't the ATC give more time for the Asiana A380?
The moment the aircraft rocked, both pilots and passengers would panic. scary😱
Great job capruting these2 events of Supers in wake turbulence! I didnt the big ones would feel it; Amazeballs!!
Amazing. And I love the passion that you guys show. Keep up the good work
incredible video, definitely one for the ages.
I would have been terrified if I was on that last plane.
Saw that one live too, it was crazy.
Oof that second Asiana around the 6-7 minute mark 😱 if I was a passenger on the flight I would have needed a new pair of pants after that 😵😅
Korean air was winner on March 28. Departed after Asiana but landed 11 minutes before him.
I experienced wake turbulence once leaving Toronto, we were in a British Airways 777, took off right behind an Air India 777 it was quite the scare!
Didn’t expect to see an A380 being pushed around in wake turbulence !
If taxiways need to be cleared for super wingspans and separation increased for wake turbulence, doesn’t that mean the total number of passengers getting though the airport is fewer when these big beasts are around, despite their greater capacity ?
If I was a bizjet there, I’d think twice before taking off anytime soon behind them.
They should use this video for training. Just think what that wake would do to a light single engine airplane.
Looks like Korean air having a wake turbulence party. Great videos as always .
This is your captain speaking…..We’ll be circling back to airport for landing, so everyone can put fresh underwear on. 07:01 - 07:13 😅
That's very cool!! I'm loving this!!
While that may be cool to look at, meaning the wake turbulence, It can be really dangerous. there was a plane crash that happened not long after 911 and it was an airbus that went down in New York, it was caused by wake turbulence from a 747 and the particular plane which I believe was an airbus A310, if I'm not mistaken and the guy was hitting the rudder pedals a little bit too hard and it caused the tail section the horizontal a stabilizer to break off due to him pushing the rudder pedals beyond their limit and it caused it to crash in New York. I'm sure you guys know which one I'm talking about.
Yes, I remember this. A lot of people thought it was another terrorist attack. Such a horrible crash.
Yes, I remember that one. It was AA flight 587 and it was an A300. Many people thought it was another terrorist attack, but as you mentioned, it was the pilot overuse of the rudder to correct wake turbulence. Very unfortunate and sad incident.
@@katrinajones8788wasn’t it a dc10 or md11 ?
Affirm, while i would say it was more of a manouvering error due to fast response provided by the pillots, still wake turbulence is a no joke. I hope they file a report and do something.
Yeah AA 587. A300 . Pilots seeme aware of the wake turbulance and that was what it was but one of them hit the rudder hard which added to the turbulance and the pilots thought it was still the wake turbulance. I guess other pilots had noted that this particular pilot was hard on the rudder but it turned out that there was an issue with the training manuel that AA put out regarding wake turbulance and using the rudder. Irony was that several people who were killed on 587 were survivors of 911 including from escaping from the attack on the WTC towers.
Would like to see the video took inside the cabin in Asiana Airlines, do u think anyone can share?
Incredible. What Camera did you use? Quite powerful.
That was awesome seeing those spoilers deployed for such a long period with no associated roll.
ASIANA A380 trying to avoid wake turbulence on takeoff by pivoting before the rotation point of the preceding aircraft and maneuvering to avoid its path.
Good job 😎
Whoa. I would've needed to change my shorts if I was on that flight.
I gasped so loudly on the last clip. WHEW