Who Was Ibn Taymiyyah RA Biography Dars 1 , Al Fatwa al Hamawiyah, Dr Manzoor Ah Mir, Savood Harmain
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ก.ค. 2022
- Who Was Ibn Taymiyyah RA Biography Dars 1 , Fatwa Al Hamawiya, Dr Manzoor Ah Mir, Savood Harmain Studio's
#ibntaymiyyah #biography
#SavoodHarmainProduction
🔴 Subscribe To Our Channel:
/ savoodsalafi
▬▬▬:::JOIN US :::▬▬▬
TH-cam📲
/ savoodsalafi
FaceBook📲
/ savood-harmain-production
Instagram📲
/ savoodharmain
Telegram📲
t.me/joinchat/HHzU4HOIn8aB2lJU
Twitter📲
SavoodSalafi?s=08
Whatsapp📲
chat.whatsapp.com/L3EpGSZSYjw...
📌Copyright Notice:
All rights of the audio and video production is reserved for SAVOOD HARMAIN PRODUCTION. Hence, it's not permissible to reupload without our permission. However, you may share this production on Social Media Platforms
📌 Watch All Lectures of mushtaq ah Veeri sb given in 2021 January
• Playlist
📌 watch All lectures of Irshad ah Tantray Almadni almost 232 • Playlist
📌About Us:
SAVOOD HARMAIN PRODUCTION working on Different Lectures Like... Jummah Sermons, Ijtima Sermons, Studio Programs, Interviews, Scientific Series Lectures, Motivational Videos, Nikah Sermons and Peace sharing events. For any detail please contact us:
📱+91 70063 49184
📱+91 88034 94226
📱+91 70062 51141
📧saudahmad3@gmail.com
📌 Mistakenly Uploaded:
If We have Mistakenly Uploaded any Copyright Material, please Message us and we will take it down immediately
________________________
TEAM
SAVOOD-HARMAIN PRODUCTION
![[TH] VCT Pacific Stage 2 - Week 4 Day 1 // PRX vs RRQ | GE vs GEN](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/iIi2_04jGr0/mqdefault.jpg)
One of greatest thinkers in history
My favourite scholar 🥀❤️
Sheikh ul Islam ibn tymmiah rahimahullaah ❤️
Ibn tahmiya is a yazeedi lover.
You along with ibn tahmiya will go to hell
Allahtala apne hifzo aman mien rakhe sheikh ,ameen
SHYKH 🖤
Mashallah
Mashallah Stay blessed
HIFAZAT 🖤
❤️
❤❤❤
OLVYZ! FAV! 💙😍
Really my inspiration
❤️❤️❤️❤️
💗💗💗
💚
❤❤❤❤❤
😍
Waiting
❤❤❤❤❤
Stay Blessed❤
My love and reverence for Imam is unmatched❤
🍁❤❤🍁
NEXT DARAS UPLOAD
19:00
I was thinking same
Sheikh ka dars kaha par hota hai?
Plz send pdf of it
علامہ ابن القیم الجوزی رحمۃ اللّٰہ علیہ کے حضرت علامہ سید محمد قاسم شاہ صاحب بخاری رحمۃ اللہ علیہ بھی زبردست معتقد تھے خصوصاً کتاب الروح وغیرہ کے تناظر میں ۔۔۔البتہ علامہ بخاری قبلہ مرحوم علامہ ابن تیمیہ رحمہ اللہ کے احترام میں کسی سے پیچھے نہیں تھے انہوں نے ابن تیمیہ رحمہ اللہ کو اپنی معرکتہ الآرا تصنیف تاج العارفین جلد دوم میں انہیں شیخ الاسلام کے لقب سے یاد کیا ھے۔۔اور راقم الحروف نے بھی یہی طریقہ ہمیشہ اپنایا ۔۔۔۔تاج العارفین مذکورہ کتاب میں درج آخر پر میرا قصیدہ خاتمتہ الکتاب اس پر گواہ ہے۔ تاج العارفین کا مقدمہ اردو میں حضرت مولانا سید محمد اشرف صاحب اندرابی رحمۃ اللہ علیہ اور عربی میں مولانا محمد امین صاحب واجدی مرحوم نے تحریر فرمایا ھے ۔حضرت مولانا مفتی محمد عبد الغنی ازہری الشافعی کی عربی تقریظ۔۔۔۔۔جو حال میں ہی الگ شایع کی گئی حاضر ھے
شوکت حسین کینگ
Xuvv
I want to join salafia college. But i am son of poor father and i cannot afford the fee.
There is no free only admission
Baqi duroos kaha hai
th-cam.com/video/DKbBNx8sPbE/w-d-xo.htmlsi=IwKgfNNqRZ3np35
Sir aap kehtay hoo ki ham ahle hadees Hain aur ham sabhi imam ko maantay hai lakin Kisi aaik ko nhi aab Mera question ye hai ki mainay observe Kiya hai ki har ahle hadees ibn taymiyah aur ibn qayyam ko follow krtay hain aur phir kehtay hai ki ham gair muqallid Hain aur Quran aur hadees ko maantay hai
Iss Ka Matlab aap bhi muqallid hai aaik imam ke
Taqleed is absolutely different to what Ahl ul Hadith follow from Imams with "نص"(proof).
Please understand the "School of thought of Taqleed."
@@idreesbakhtyaar bro tell me one thing kya ahle hadees awam joo hai mtlb aam log kya sabhi aam log khud Quran aur hadees se maslay nikaktay hai ya phir apnay ulma se poochtay hai
@@shoaibawan1901 Ulema se puchenge obviously ki Quran aur Sunnah mai kya bola gaya "A" ya "B" k liye.
=> Bi-daleel poochenge.
=> Taqleed tab hoti jab seedhay boltay ki "A" or "B' maslay ka solution kya hai....aur Aalim/Molvi/Mufti bolta ki iss mai imam nay ya maine aisa bola hai. (Bila Daleel)
*Kabi Ahl Hadees Molvi sb/mufti see aam aadmi bann kr poocho, they'll give you the answer and quote from the uloom ul gayaat.
@@shoaibawan1901Aam awam jis b jamaat sae hai taqleed hi krtae hai phir inka naam ahlulhadees hi ku na ho hr kisi ko talib ilm bnnae ki zarorat hai aam logo ko kya pata
@@shoaibawan1901aur gaer muqallid lafz acha nhi hai Hum sb imamo ko follow krtae hai aur jis ki raaye jis mslae mae zada qareeb ho Quran o sunnat sae issi pr aml krtae hai
Ibn Taymiyah - great hanbali scholar, infact sheikh ul islam of hanbali.He is not the sheikh ul islam of ISLAM there is nobody that has that title .The prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam that's his domain, he's the one who encompasses all of the ISLAM .
You are making no sense. The Prophet was the Prophet.
Ibn Taymiyyah and His Heretical Beliefs
QUESTION:
Who is Ibn Taymiyyah, whom Wahhabis [Salafis] call Sheikh-ul-Islam and follow?
What did our scholars say about him?
ANSWER
He was formerly a Hanbali scholar of fiqh and hadith.
Then he became a la-Madhhabi.
He was jailed in Egypt twice due to his writings that went against Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l Jama’ah.
He was born in 1263 in Harran [a town of Urfa province in Turkey].
He died in 1328 while he was imprisoned in the citadel of Damascus.
Ibn Taymiyyah could not appreciate the superiority of Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l Jama’ah scholars.
He denied Tasawwuf (Sufism) and, therefore, deviated from Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l Jama’ah.
His books are sources for opponents of the four madhhabs who call themselves Salafists.
Opponents of the four madhhabs praise him and address him as the master of restorers (mujaddids) of Islam.
That Ibn Taymiyyah was unfortunate and misguided is written in the books Sayf-ul-Jabbar and Talim-us-Subyan.
The latter was written in Persian.
In the book Tathir-ul-fuad min-danis-il i’tiqad written by Muhammad Bahit, who was a Hanafi scholar in Jami-ul-Azhar, and in the other books, such as At-Tawassuli bin-Nabi wa bis-Salihin,
Shawahid-ul-Haqq, Jawahir-ul-Bihar, Sayf-ul-Jabbar, and Talim-us-Subyan, it is proven with evidence that Ibn Taymiyyah lapsed into heresy.
Ibn Battuta, Ibn Hajar al-Makki, Imam-i Subki, Izzaddin bin Jama’a, Abu Hayyan Zahiri, Zahid al-Kawthari, Yusuf an-Nabhani, Imam-i Sharani, Ahmad bin Sayyid Zayni Dahlan, Sheikh-ul-Islam Mustafa Sabri Efendi, and many other scholars wrote refutations to Ibn Taymiyyah and explained his heresy and k*fr beliefs.
Necip Fazıl Kısakurek said,
“Sayyid Abdulhakim Arwasi stated,
‘Ibn Taymiyyah was a mulhid who damaged the religion from within.’”
(Turkiye’nin Manzarası [The Scenery of Turkey])
It is written on the 107th page of the Tafsir of Sawi that he was misguided and misguiding others.
Islamic scholars stated:
“He was a person whose knowledge was made by Allah سبحانه و تعالى a cause for his misguidance.”
[Ibn Hajar al-Makki - Fatawa Hadisiyya]
“Ibn Taymiyyah was such a person that great scholars gave answers to his corrupt opinions and flimsy evidence and showed the ugliness of his ideas.
[Muhammad] Izz ibni Jama’a [Shafi’i scholar of fiqh and hadith who served as a qadi in Damascus, Egypt, and Jerusalem] said about him,
‘He was a person whom Allah سبحانه و تعالى misguided, led astray, and made wear the shirt of lowness.
He foolishly raised objections to Islamic scholars and especially to the Rightly Guided Caliphs.’”
[Ibn Hajar al-Makki - Al Jawhar-ul-Munzam]
“The ideas of Ibn Taymiyyah are worthless.
He was misguided and misguiding Muslims.
He deviated from the consensus of Muslims and took a heretical path. Islamic scholars stated in unanimity that he was a heretic.
Kutbud-Bardiri wrote this in detail in his commentary on Mukhtasar.”
[Tahir Muhammad Sulayman - Zahiratul-fiqhil-Kubra]
“Kitab-ul-Arsh is one of his most awful books.
There were scholars who said that a person who addressed him as Sheikh-ul-Islam would become a disbeliever.”
[Imam Subki]
(He says so in the supercommentary on Nabras)
“Whoever follows Ibn Taymiyyah, his property and life is halal
[lawful].”
[Mirat-ul-Janan, supercommentary on Nabras]
Ibn Taymiyyah says in his Kitab-ul-Arsh,
“Allah sits on the Arsh, and He leaves space for His Messenger to sit next to Him.”
In his book As-Sirat-ul-Mustaqim, he declared some notable companions, such as Ibn Abbas, disbelievers.
[Kashf-uz-Zunun]
In his book Al-Abudiyyat, he says that making dhikr of Allah’s سبحانه و تعالى name is innovation and heresy, and he made vicious slanders on Sufi masters.
Ibn Taymiyyah said,
“The existence of the Arsh is beginningless [qadim].”
[Sharh al-Aqaid al-Adudiyya]
While descending from the minbar of the mosque of Damascus, he said,
“Allah descends from the sky to the earth just as I am descending now.”
[Ibn Battuta - Tuhfat-un-Nuzzar]
Even Abd ar-Raziq Pasha, who was a disciple of Abduh and followed in his footsteps, said,
“Just as Wahhabism is linked to Ibn Taymiyyah in one respect, so the reformists ideas of Abduh, who is called the restorer [mujaddid] of the current century, are linked to Ibn Taymiyyah.”
Ibn Taymiyyah said,
“It is not necessary to make up qada salats.”
However, making up a qada salat is obligatory in all of the four madhhabs.
He claimed that the torment of Hell would notthe eternal.
However, there are many Qur’anic verses stating that disbelievers will remain in Hell eternally.
(Al-Baqara 81, Al-Ahzab 65, Fussilat 28,
Az-Zukhruf 74)
By saying,
“Umar made a lot of mistakes,”
he objected to the hadith-i sharif that says,
“Allah سبحانه و تعالى has put the true word on
the tongue of Umar [He never makes a mistake].”
Even if the majority of the Companions erred in the matters deduced by way of ijtihad, their errors were related to ijtihad.
It cannot be known whether a mujtahid erred in his ijtihad because an ijtihad does not invalidate another ijtihad.
For this reason, those honorable people,
who were mujtahids, should not be criticized.
Though the ijtihads of the four madhhabs are different from one other, their founders did not criticize one another on the basis of difference in their ijtihads.
He attacked Sufi masters, such as Hadrat Sadraddin al-Konawi and Ibn Arabi and said,
“The books of Ghazali are full of fabricated hadiths.”
(Hadiqa)
Hadrat Imam Sharani stated,
“Ibn Taymiyyah denied Tasawwuf [Sufism] and made defamatory remarks on the Awliya’.
One must beware of reading his books in the same way as one bewares of predators.”
[Tabakat-ul-Kubra]
Hadrat Imam Suyuti stated:
“Ibn Taymiyyah was arrogant and full of himself.
It was his habit to represent himself as superior to everybody, to look down on the person whom he talked to, and to make fun of great scholars.”
[Kam-ul Muarid]
Muhammad Ali Bey said in his Hitat-ush-Sham,
“Ibn Taymiyyah’s and Priest Luther’s aims were identical.
Whereas the Christian reformer was successful, the reformer of Islam was unsuccessful.”
Hadrat Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani stated,
He spoke ill of the great ones of the Companions and said,
“It is haram to set out on a journey to visit the grave of the Messenger of Allah.
[Hadrat] Ali’s imaan was not valid because he was a child when he believed.
[Hadrat] Uthman had excessive love for wealth.”
[Ad-Durar-ul-Kamina]
Hadrat Ibn Hajar al-Makki said,
“Ibn Taymiyyah denied the immunity of prophets from sins.
However, it is one of the attributes of prophets.”
He objected to one’s visiting the blessed grave of our Master the Prophet and those of the
Companions, the Awliya’, scholars, and pious Muslims.
He considered it haram to use them as a means for intercession.
[Fatawa Hadisiyya]
He was the extremist , a cruel person
Plz go and research first on him
Logically destroyed false thinkers 😂😂😂😂
😝😝😝😝😝
Like sufi
Ganie Rabaeb Sufi's andbakht follower spotted
WhatsApp University graduate ha chui.. Go and research proper about Shaikh ul Islam ibn tamiyyah rh. Sheikh se takleef unko hai jinko biddah aur hsirk se muhabbat hai
@@shuraimbhat6675 mujy to biddah aur shirk sy mohabbat nhi hai, magr tum khud ko sahi sabit krny ky liyay mujy yeh tag dy rahay ho
brother, plz aak bar sab fiqu ky ulama sy iss ky baray may sunno
apny to bs tareef hi kry gy critisize nhi krtay, logic nhi dytay
plz brother
what kind of beard is that? That’s not the Sunni beard
itni khobsurat hai aap ko kya huva sunnat sae mohabbat nhi hai aap ko
@@AbdulKhader-786 kis nai bola aek muthi zarori hai iss kae baad b bada sktae hai nabi saw nai kbhi cut nhi kii lken kuch suhaba sae hajj kae moqa pai aek muthi kae baad katna b najayez hai aur hadees mae aaya hai dadi ko bdaav mochi ko kato
@@AbdulKhader-786 nehr tk thii inko aur kati kbhi nhi Hadees wajah hai dadi kobdaav moocho ko kato mtlb dadi bdana hi behtr hai
@@AbdulKhader-786 nabi saw ko naturally itni hi thii ab jb nabi saw ka qavul hai dadi ko bdaav qavul hukm hota hai bhai asool fiqh pdo jaha nabi saw ka hukm ho wo krna hota hai hukm hai dadi ko bdaav ab bola mae nai aek muthi toh zarori rkhni hai lken iss sae aagae b bda sktae hai nabi saw ka hukm hai agr kuch jantae ho Asool fiqh kae barae mae phir smj aaya hoga
@@AbdulKhader-786 aur aap ko hai pehlae dadi aek muthi Pehlae khud pr amal krna chahiyae dosrae ko criticise mt kro khaas toor pr jb ilm na ho aur bohat sarae suhaba ko aek muthi sae zada thii dadi aur salaf soliheen ko b tabeen ko
Oh my god beard like jews, 😢
May Allah guide you.
then what kind of beard is better to shave the half of face !
@@basitriyaz-hv3cx beard that do not look ugly, and do not pass the length of your fist, prophet s.a.w. did not tell us to look ugly.
@@TheoryIsPactical He isn't ugly, your thinking and standard is. Plus there are various hadiths which prove that growing beard is mandatory for all men. “Trim the moustache and leave the beard,” (Al Bukhari and Muslim).
"Leave" is encouraged. Plus trimming that exceeds the fist is allowed as proven from Abdullah ibn Umar RA but is not mandatory. If you say it's not allowed to grow beyond the fist length, bring proof.
keyboard warrior
@@TheoryIsPactical brother you should not judge anybody , especially his face , even if you are from Hanafi background some Sahaba have more beard than one fist .. agr itna hee khoobsurat dikhna hai fir tum shave hee karo ..