We consent to the contract of the constitution with all citizens that do not directly deny its a implied contract where govt agrees to protect the rights liberty proerty and we participate the contract is breached by govt when govt fauls to fulfill its ordained duty ascribed in the constitution. Founders understood if govt fails to uphold its duty it becomes the duty of citizens to establish a new govt
The Professor misquotes Islam in his speech. The laws in Islam are not a pre-existing code to be copied down. Rather, they too are a set of general principles which were in turn built upon by the Mujtahids and the fuqahas of the earlier days of Isalm and are still being built upon by the present day Mujtahids and Fuqahas.
We consent to the contract of the constitution with all citizens that do not directly deny its a implied contract where govt agrees to protect the rights liberty proerty and we participate the contract is breached by govt when govt fauls to fulfill its ordained duty ascribed in the constitution.
Founders understood if govt fails to uphold its duty it becomes the duty of citizens to establish a new govt
Well put on the natural law and man's law,soverginty by yahshua.equity jurisprudence....
They assume "implied consent" by us not asserting our God given rights as living, breathing natural beings.
The Professor misquotes Islam in his speech. The laws in Islam are not a pre-existing code to be copied down. Rather, they too are a set of general principles which were in turn built upon by the Mujtahids and the fuqahas of the earlier days of Isalm and are still being built upon by the present day Mujtahids and Fuqahas.
Missed the point