I've been using it to reflect on my therapy sessions. I take notes in my journal and then on the whiteboard I have themes point to relevant blocks for that theme. That way I can jump to the block and read the entire notes for context if needed.
I would say a more technical / serious variant of Milanote, interesting! I personally prefer 'Figjam' for fast & clean whiteboarding / brainstorming, highly recommended!
Logseq is Free Open Source software. Obsidian is proprietary closed source software tied the destiny of the company. Logseq is an outliner, everything runs around the concept of blocks. It has queries and properties (metadata) for both pages and blocks. It has a great PDF annotation feature built-in. There are many reasons to prefer Logseq to Obsidian.
@@alxlg logseq is slow as hell, eveything takes a couple of seconds for anything to appear on the screen. it's a "native like" app, but its performance more like notion, even poorer than notion. while obsidian is considered having an S tier speed and performance, which is blazingly fast, also everything in logseq is a bullet point, which is, how can i emphasize my point if everything is a bullet point, is this a reading aid for dyslexic or something? logseq didn't offer a good flexibility either, Obsidian use Markdown which future proof, while logseq use their own imaginary markdown which will mess things up when exporting. i can't use logseq seriously, it's too narrow minded, too limiting. i don't know why in the right mind people would prefer to use logseq after they try both logseq and obsidian. maybe the write and forget method of logseq is attractive for people who just want to write, trauma dump, and forget about it. i really put effort and tried to incorporate Logseq into my workflow, i even spent a month using it extensively. it's just unuseable, maybe because i have no issue with organizing my notes, unlike some people who hates labeling and categorizing their notes, and just want to write random thing impulsively but, it's a final straw when an iddle logseq makes my laptop Hot and laggy for no reason. a mere notes app hogging ton of resources, for what? sending my whole SSD data to a foreign Government?
@@jensenraylight8011 I just listed some of the reasons to use Logseq instead of Obsidian, I'm not interested to debate in TH-cam comments. Anyway Logseq works well on my 6 years old ultrabook with integrated Intel GPU, it just takes a few seconds to start because of ClojureScript but for me the benefit of this choice outweight that disadvantage.
@@alxlg well, i really want logseq to work because i heard a lot of good review about it, but it's not working for me. it's adding zero value to my life, worse it eats up more of my time everything that logseq can do, Obsidian can do it too. Outliner? guess what Obsidian have an amazing Header centric Outline as well and i prefer Obsidian outline. query and metadata, yep it's there as well i use Math Latex, music notation and Code all the time in Obsidian. in Logseq, the implementation is kinda sad. in summary, i already tried to reason and justify using logseq. i watched ton of video on every feature of logseq, and i didn't get any value at some point, i thought that people are somehow band up and faking logseq hype on forum, because there are many Logseq people in the forum trash talking Obsidian. when in reality, logseq isn't up to the standard against obsidian i bother write a long reply about it because there are a lot of logseq users misleading everyone into believing that logseq is a cure for all diseases.
@@jensenraylight8011 well I understand it is not for everyone at the moment but it has great plans, for example new users may like the upcoming query builder. I use some of the most advanced features like Datalog queries, evaluating Clojure, Hiccup and HTML so I am biased. I also write a lot of LaTeX in Logseq and macros, custom commands and templates help a lot with that. If you need help on the Logseq forum my username is alex0. Of course try to be respectful there, the team is doing their best to deliver a proper FOSS alternative but it is a huge challenge.
This feature seems cool too bad its behind a paywall. Everyone saying free and open source seem to miss the free version has no access to this or even the sync feature.
I've been using it to reflect on my therapy sessions. I take notes in my journal and then on the whiteboard I have themes point to relevant blocks for that theme. That way I can jump to the block and read the entire notes for context if needed.
Thank you for this!
Question: have you found a comfortable way to use Logseq PDF annotation on a tablet?
Great feature! when will it be released to public?
I would say a more technical / serious variant of Milanote, interesting! I personally prefer 'Figjam' for fast & clean whiteboarding / brainstorming, highly recommended!
Thanks for sharing!
Does logseq have iCloud support?
It does, although I believe their Sync service is more reliable (I'm not an Apple user so I don't have a direct comparison)
not working: i have a new whiteboard but i can't do anything in it. No grid, no buttons, no context menue
how do you copy it with arrow? I cant figure it out
Obsidian nailed this earlier...can't see the reason to move to locseq? Mobile app?
Logseq is Free Open Source software. Obsidian is proprietary closed source software tied the destiny of the company.
Logseq is an outliner, everything runs around the concept of blocks. It has queries and properties (metadata) for both pages and blocks.
It has a great PDF annotation feature built-in.
There are many reasons to prefer Logseq to Obsidian.
@@alxlg logseq is slow as hell, eveything takes a couple of seconds for anything to appear on the screen.
it's a "native like" app, but its performance more like notion, even poorer than notion.
while obsidian is considered having an S tier speed and performance, which is blazingly fast,
also everything in logseq is a bullet point, which is, how can i emphasize my point if everything is a bullet point,
is this a reading aid for dyslexic or something?
logseq didn't offer a good flexibility either,
Obsidian use Markdown which future proof, while logseq use their own imaginary markdown which
will mess things up when exporting.
i can't use logseq seriously, it's too narrow minded, too limiting.
i don't know why in the right mind people would prefer to use logseq after they try both logseq and obsidian.
maybe the write and forget method of logseq is attractive for people who just want to write, trauma dump, and forget about it.
i really put effort and tried to incorporate Logseq into my workflow, i even spent a month using it extensively.
it's just unuseable, maybe because i have no issue with organizing my notes,
unlike some people who hates labeling and categorizing their notes, and just want to write random thing impulsively
but, it's a final straw when an iddle logseq makes my laptop Hot and laggy for no reason.
a mere notes app hogging ton of resources, for what? sending my whole SSD data to a foreign Government?
@@jensenraylight8011 I just listed some of the reasons to use Logseq instead of Obsidian, I'm not interested to debate in TH-cam comments. Anyway Logseq works well on my 6 years old ultrabook with integrated Intel GPU, it just takes a few seconds to start because of ClojureScript but for me the benefit of this choice outweight that disadvantage.
@@alxlg well, i really want logseq to work because i heard a lot of good review about it, but it's not working for me.
it's adding zero value to my life, worse it eats up more of my time
everything that logseq can do, Obsidian can do it too.
Outliner? guess what Obsidian have an amazing Header centric Outline as well and i prefer Obsidian outline.
query and metadata, yep it's there as well
i use Math Latex, music notation and Code all the time in Obsidian.
in Logseq, the implementation is kinda sad.
in summary, i already tried to reason and justify using logseq. i watched ton of video on every feature of logseq, and i didn't get any value
at some point, i thought that people are somehow band up and faking logseq hype on forum, because there are many Logseq people in the forum trash talking Obsidian.
when in reality, logseq isn't up to the standard against obsidian
i bother write a long reply about it because there are a lot of logseq users misleading everyone into believing that logseq is a cure for all diseases.
@@jensenraylight8011 well I understand it is not for everyone at the moment but it has great plans, for example new users may like the upcoming query builder. I use some of the most advanced features like Datalog queries, evaluating Clojure, Hiccup and HTML so I am biased. I also write a lot of LaTeX in Logseq and macros, custom commands and templates help a lot with that. If you need help on the Logseq forum my username is alex0. Of course try to be respectful there, the team is doing their best to deliver a proper FOSS alternative but it is a huge challenge.
This feature seems cool too bad its behind a paywall. Everyone saying free and open source seem to miss the free version has no access to this or even the sync feature.
Milanote like. Clones over clones. Boring.
Logseq is already a powerhouse, whiteboard is just an extra feature.
Logseq is Free Open Source software that runs locally on your PC storing data as text files for free.
Interesting you see this comparison.