By the way, can you UPLOAD (not link) a pdf/word doc/ppt/jpeg/png to a LogSeq page? And can the search function search these items link you can in Obsidian and Evernote? Evernote is amazing at its searching of attached files.
I feel logseq is better then obsidian. But this is used for log mindset people who used to note in small points, as compare to obsidian for long notes.
Which one is better? Doesn't it depend on the type of person and the type of projects that you do. So for example, I write a lot of books. I do a lot of lengthy writing. Some of my books are 35 chapters long (for professionals, university level). For this, wouldn't Obsidian be the better tool - allows you to do big lengthy notes as well as add in "granular level" detail which is easily possible in Obsidian. The big thing for me is Folders - I need some sort of organisation structure of pages - possible in Obsidian - but I believe you cant in LogSeq. In LogSeq you can only add pages as favourties which is not the same thing? Please do correct me someone if I am wrong. Thanks x I hope this helps someone.
@@rinleeds For me, Logseq is a good option. I just used it to interlink between daily journals. And the most lovely feature In Logseq, clicking on a link or page displays all extracts from various daily logs. In Obsedian, graphy shows interlinked pages, but you have to go to individual pages or posts for details. I used Notion for my lengthy logs, articles, and blog posts. The only challenge I am facing is the sync between my personal laptop and Logseq for my personal projects, thoughts, and daily tasks. While on the office laptop, I mostly create a daily journal with to-dos and what tasks I complete during office hours. There are some plug-ins available in log-seq for big notes, but I never used them. Markup, or mind map, is the second good feature. In a map view, the plugin helps me view nodes and sub-nodes. that helps me brainstorm my articles. Anyhow, I am thankful to @keepProductive for this powerful tool.
Much better, both different, obsidian is for long notes, while logseq is small notes like log, parent child, obsidian did not have / feature like notion, but logseq have. If you love log style notes, bullet points, todo, logseq is for you, if you want long notes like notion use obsidian. Major different in graph, Obsidian leads t empty page, while click on nodes, while if you click on logseq, all notes on single page from actual notes shown there, which is more powerful then obsidian which show you empty links, where you can add each link as separate page to add your notes.
![[#2024MAMA] ROSÉ (로제), Bruno Mars - APT. | Mnet 241122 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dgGqD28J6aQ/mqdefault.jpg)
*Explore Dario's Logseq Course*
✅ Logseq Course: www.logseqmastery.com/?sa=sa0040601163351fe57b3df6694acdc8250e0f3aed
By the way, can you UPLOAD (not link) a pdf/word doc/ppt/jpeg/png to a LogSeq page? And can the search function search these items link you can in Obsidian and Evernote? Evernote is amazing at its searching of attached files.
I feel logseq is better then obsidian. But this is used for log mindset people who used to note in small points, as compare to obsidian for long notes.
Which one is better? Doesn't it depend on the type of person and the type of projects that you do. So for example, I write a lot of books. I do a lot of lengthy writing. Some of my books are 35 chapters long (for professionals, university level). For this, wouldn't Obsidian be the better tool - allows you to do big lengthy notes as well as add in "granular level" detail which is easily possible in Obsidian. The big thing for me is Folders - I need some sort of organisation structure of pages - possible in Obsidian - but I believe you cant in LogSeq. In LogSeq you can only add pages as favourties which is not the same thing? Please do correct me someone if I am wrong. Thanks x I hope this helps someone.
@@rinleeds For me, Logseq is a good option. I just used it to interlink between daily journals. And the most lovely feature In Logseq, clicking on a link or page displays all extracts from various daily logs. In Obsedian, graphy shows interlinked pages, but you have to go to individual pages or posts for details. I used Notion for my lengthy logs, articles, and blog posts.
The only challenge I am facing is the sync between my personal laptop and Logseq for my personal projects, thoughts, and daily tasks. While on the office laptop, I mostly create a daily journal with to-dos and what tasks I complete during office hours.
There are some plug-ins available in log-seq for big notes, but I never used them. Markup, or mind map, is the second good feature. In a map view, the plugin helps me view nodes and sub-nodes. that helps me brainstorm my articles. Anyhow, I am thankful to @keepProductive for this powerful tool.
@@rinleeds You could make good use of Scrivener then.
Sync behind paywall and the Android app not in the app store. It's going to be a pass for me. Thanks for the video!
That first camera shot looks so bad for a channel with 415k subs
We’ve done a lot to improve our look since
@@toolfinderhq you're right the new videos look great
Logseq is obsidian
Obsidian is Logseq
Much better, both different, obsidian is for long notes, while logseq is small notes like log, parent child, obsidian did not have / feature like notion, but logseq have. If you love log style notes, bullet points, todo, logseq is for you, if you want long notes like notion use obsidian. Major different in graph, Obsidian leads t empty page, while click on nodes, while if you click on logseq, all notes on single page from actual notes shown there, which is more powerful then obsidian which show you empty links, where you can add each link as separate page to add your notes.