Woman fined $88K after kids collect clams from Pismo Beach
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 พ.ค. 2024
- Streaming now at abc7chicago.com/watch/live/11....
Officials say it's important to educate yourself and your children about clams before going ashore.
Read more | abc7chicago.com/post/californ...
![ความรักของยักษ์เขียว (ทศกัณฐ์) - เดี่ยว ไออุ่น [OFFICIAL MUSICVIDEO 4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yCCy-QVHqK8/mqdefault.jpg)
88K penalty for clams while the maximum penalty for animal cruelty is 20K which they seldom enforce maximum amount.
Clams are people too, save these clams 😂
The common denominator that he’s making is that both are animals and both are fines. This is called: DRAWING a COMPARISON. Genius.
They’re possibly protected also, the cost of the services, treatments , continamination, veterinary care, and etc
The clams suffocated to death. That's animal cruelty. So 72 x $20k is $1.4m. sounds like she got off easy with the $88k.
88k is too much. $15k maybe ?
Ridiculous! Criminals bail at $1000 and then kids accidentally collect clams and get fined for 88k. BS.
Facts that’s 500 deff hurts. Especially all those kids. Judge coulda have easily dropped the charge and not have her pay anything it was a legit mistake. That law is for the people that take clams for profit and know they shouldn’t be doing that. That law isn’t for a moms and kids thinking they kicked a couple mistaken seashells on a family trip smh. That law should enforced on the real guilty people. The cop who gave the ticket and the judge should have Bette r judgement smh.
Wow! You are absolutely right .I didn't think of that side of it .wow.
They didn't accidentally collect clams. They consciously picked them up with the intention of keeping them. The $88K fine is intended to be fought so a reduced fine can then be issued. That is one of the best lessons those kids will ever get. Bravo justice system!
Nothing ‘accidental’ about this.
@@jimdent351 hahahah omg you americans truly hate each other lol...its great again alright. :)
How the hell were these kids to know? Your excuse is to educate them on clams? What a joke. Meanwhile retail thieves get a slap on the wrist.
There are literal signs around telling you not to take from the beach and they disregarded them because they didn’t take it serious nor understand the difference apparently. It’s rather obvious what the problem here is. Saying “I won” displays the fact that she has no idea how damaging this can be to an environment. You are comparing poaching to retail theft and they are not the same. A living creature is not that same as a hat or chain.
@@BEmeraldJade literal ?????? Literal signs ? What does that EVEN mean ??????
Just "signs".
72 clams? They should know not to take that many. Also conflating this thievery is horrible logic. Stop using one bad thing to criticize something completely different
@@davedaves3489
Lol. Yes, literal signs.
As opposed to subtle or even obvious signs of something. "Signs" of all things, can mean ANYTHING.
A good lesson for her kids will be, don't get a tattoo herself for every situation in her life. Thanks God that her kids don't grabb sex toys illegally in a sex shop. I can't imagine the form of tattoo.
The person who issued the 88k fine is a sociopath
a white liberal that hates white people
Cheaper to steal from a store...nothing will happen to you.
Exactly SMH , All this granny wanted was a fun day at the beach with the kids , 💔🥲🦪
Haha
Yep!
sad but true
Welcome to Commiefornia - the land of Fruits and Nuts!
Idgaf 88k is absolutely ridiculous.
You can't put a price on life.
Make it make sense
@@Chantalansure you can. Just look around.
*You own nothing and are happy!*
There is no rule of law, only tyranny of unelected goons that have the pull to rob you.
How many boomers did this in the 20th century as children and didn't get gooned?
Her fine was reduced to $500.
So she got the ticket while still there, at the beach? He could have schooled them all on why this is illegal, had them empty their buckets of the clams-put them back....and everything would have been fine. 90k dollar fine on an average family is life ending! This is absolutely ridiculous. I am speaking as a long time law enforcement officer-there's something called "officer discretion." It means the officer doesn't HAVE to arrest, you can talk with the offender, advise them of the law and its consequences, it doesn't have to include an arrest. This didn't have to end in an almost 90k ticket. I wouldn't go to that town or beach for any amount of free vacation! This is horrible.
I notice that there is no real human in park rangers or fish and game officials. It is very sad.
And while they were fining this single mom $88k for clams a protected class citizen was in the parking lot stealing his 3rd Kia of the day...
State crime, this is Federal. Or are you regaling us with your original commenting??? Gee, how many of these types of comments do I see on these threads?? 1,000??
Not in my county! Our law enforcement is top notch 👌
@@aliecarey count yourself lucky... its so ass backwards here that punishing this person is more important than rampant property crimes are...
Stay on topic son. Right now we're talking about a greedy family being fined for being greedy and pulling 72 clams - instead of 1-2. We can talk about the stolen kia in the parking lot another time.
You have KIDS shooting people and nothing happens to the parents who brought up the little animals, yet this? WTF is wrong here?
You are what's wrong here. A woman got fined $500 for illegal clamming in Pismo, California. You're the animal that's trying to connect it to other crimes for no reason.
You've completely lost touch with reality if you think this story has anything to do with shootings.
Those clams are there for the ecosystem. Humans need to stop messing with it
@@brentforrest123
So are catalytic converters, humans need to stop stealing them.
That has nothing to do with this silliness. Stay on topic. How Low can your IQ be?
worried about clams but not the murder rate.
I'm worried about just how dumb people are.
California Fish and Wildlife isn't worried about the murder rate. That's not their job.
@@iwatchyoutube523 : Exactly.
Those clams are there for the ecosystem. Humans need to stop messing with it
@AtomicGirlNYC-fu9xy that's like asking you to quit dressing up as a furry.
Nobody is that dumb to dig up 72 live clams and "think" they were collecting a few seashells. Especially with all the signs all over the place. Those clams are buried in the sand. They knew exactly what they were doing. Glad the fine was reduced to a reasonable amount but no need to pretend innocence.
you make a good point! so the $500 fee was reasonable if what you say is right. people do lie.
Have you met a child before? Assuming she's telling the truth, they don't tend to understand law and regulations. We actually allow them to be protected based on the fact that they're children for things like this.
Yah, I don't think the kids accidentally collected 72 live clams that you have to dig for. Everyone knows that two closed shells equals a live clam.
The fines are so high because there are organized criminal poaching gangs that make big money collecting illegal mussels, clams, abalone, and other tidal shellfish. There wouldn't be an animal left if the fines were only $500. She got lucky.
The judge was merciful in reducing the fine. But the officer should have given a verbal warning and returned the clams. It's not like the clams are dead.
That's what a decent officer would have done and not wasted the courts time with a joke like this 🤦🙄
There is no rule of law, only tyranny of unelected goons that have the authority to rob you.
They sure looked dead to me!
@@croiners4166 They'd been in a bucket of dry sand and then displayed in the sun. Yep, those boogers were ex-clams.
Umm, it's EXACTLY like the clams are dead, because the clams ARE DEAD. The woman didn't have them gathered gently into buckets of cool water, she had them laid out in the air and direct sunlight to be DRIED TO DEATH. And no, their dead wasn't quick and painless, they were arranged in neat rows in the dry sunlight to die slowly and horribly.
Thank you judge, 500 is reasonable not 88k
Zero is reasonable, 500 is extortion
@@Edwardsjm But we do need to protect our wildlife and the environment.
@@Edwardsjmprecisely. Just drop it, once she realized her kids’ error. It’s always about money. Not to mention the court fees and possible attorney fees she had to pay.
That is why we have judges lol. $90k would be appropriate if it was a commercial operation.
@@luongo7886 we do that by educating people , that $88k wouldnt have gone to protecting clams or to educating people about clams or to protecting wildlife or the environment . Paying it could have caused the family to become homeless so what is the benefit or the purpose of such a fine like that ?
2:14 -> Did she not notice that her tattoo is of a scallop, not a clam? 🤣 💀
That tattoo is not a clam. It’s a scallop.
Just more proof she had absolutely no clue those weren't empty shells 😂
A clam tattoo wouldn't be very impressive.
Meanwhile, they do nothing about the looters and robbers in california.
you must not pay attention
Nature is more important than a purse.
@@DevoteeCT this isn't about nature. Pismo clams are part of the local economy down there. Regulated wildlife like elk and other game....albeit smaller
Big money in commercial fishing. No money in jailing shop lifters. Rise and shine sleeping consciousness
@@frankmacleod2565somebody else gets it
$88k is excessive
While phx pd is paying themselves 30k in overtime for one month this is a joke
20,000.00 for no hard hat from osha.
150,000 dollars for a rattlesnake bite
*You own nothing and are happy!*
There is no rule of law, only tyranny of unelected goons that have the pull to rob you.
How many boomers did this in the 20th century as children and didn't get gooned?
$500 is too much
After seeing the picture I find it hard to believe they didn't know they were collecting live clams.
This is pure stupidity on the officer who issued the ticket. What he could have done was to educate the kids and their mother and let them off with a warning.
I think a $500-1000 fine sends the same message as a $88k fine; now that county just has a bad rep.
Perhaps an in depth audit of that municipality is in order.
Watch the video
The fishing regulations are enacted by the state, not the county nor city. The California legislature has a supermajority of Democrats - they can pass whatever they want; the opposition can't do anything to stop them. A significant number of them have an environmentalist bent and believe fishing is Evil, and do all sorts of things to make life miserable for people who enjoy fishing (or clamming). Like enact wildly inappropriate fines. If it weren't for a significant number of poor people who catch fish just to feed themselves, they would probably try to prohibit fishing statewide.
Yes and the fine was reduced to 500.
@@solandri69With the massive population of California, and the huge number of immigrants that recently came from countries with little/no regulations, Fish and Wildlife have to put strong measures in place to protect natural resources. Poaching is and has long been a huge problem in California waters. Can you imagine if it was a free for all? It’s not just a California environmental activist thing either. Even the solid red state of Texas has robust enforcement of their fishing and hunting regulations. Texas game wardens are some of the biggest hard asses if you’re caught harvesting without a license. In other words, you just sound like an angry and ignorant keyboard warrior.
How come this agency can enforce the law so easily while other gov agencies like the police have a hard time catching criminals even with cctv footage
These are honest folks and required zero effort from the cops. Catching real criminals takes effort.
Politics, votes, power, and money at play.
Cause a mother and couple of kids don't resist arrest.
@@davidcooke8005 Conclusion: Honesty is devastating for ones budget.
$$$$$😊
These people were hoarding clams. Do you people understand that clams are becoming an endangered species? They need to be protected.
There are over 15,000 species of clams in the world. Out of that number there are about 100
Or so species that some considered close to being endangered. While we need to do our best to conserve all populations of claims and all other animals, it’s not like earth is running out of clams.
Hmmm… No wonder then that the clam pasta that I sometimes order at a local Italian restaurant suddenly now costs a helluva lot more. 💸
Pismo beach has been talked about as a protected beach in California schools since I went to junior high there, in 1964. Kids have to know that's a famous protected beach in the USA.
Are there any warning signs?
The kids thought they were sea shells and picked up 72 of the same identical shell. Who believes that 😂
Retail theft perfectly acceptable tho..
The mom's gotta start somewhere, training future retail thieves.
Retail theft, while wrong, doesn't wreck the ecosystem.
72? outrageous
that’s what i said!
why are we letting kids take so much from nature?
@@laureydanielle3874selfish, not caring for the environment!
@@gracie2298So shellfish!
@@Jules-740 funny, good play on da word!
This is the only sensible comment section on this video. It’s so painfully obvious they aren’t shells, the mother is not that stupid lol to say “I won” shows she didn’t learn much and thinks she is still right not to be punished for removing these creatures from their environment. It seems like she didn’t learn from her actions as if it’s enough to tattoo herself and make a joke. None of this should be funny at all. It should be taken seriously. The wrongs are too obvious here. She deserved a minimum of least $5,000. So many are comparing this to retail theft and idk how they can because that’s comparing a hat to a living creature. Too many people in comment section bashing the system when the system is in place to protect the sea life/beach life. Sorry for my rant. Purely shocked at the idiocracy in the comments of this video. Seems like you’re the only one who actually sees the problem here instead of painting over it with something else.
She slipped up and said “picking” and corrected to “collecting”. Signs everywhere. What a great role model for her kids. OK folks, don’t enforce so there won’t soon be any for anybody ever again. The system worked perfect here.
LOL 😂, the smash and grab critters don't even get arrested.
@AtomicGirlNYC-fu9xy A 115 thumbs up. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
We have our priorities reversed.
@AtomicGirlNYC-fu9xy You don't seem to have any buddies. But that's OK, the world needs social misfits too.
Maybe the Department of Fish and Game should be patrolling stores instead of beaches.
@AtomicGirlNYC-fu9xy Okay, Karen. It's just an opinion. Don't have a stroke over it.
They knew what they were doing lol 🤣 they were alive not shells 72 clams are heavy asf
Yep!
Are there warning signs?
She knew they were clams. Had her kids collect them for her so she could say “we didn’t know!” 🙄
"...and then my kids accidentally dropped them in a white wine butter sauce with fresh parsley"
Um, seashells? Shells are like one shell, not two closed tight with a clam inside. They just wanted free clams to eat. Liars.
True.
Or they were just kids.
Gets a permanent tattoo on her arm of a scallop for poaching clams. Strange world we live in.
I was looking for this comment. Thank you
You can't make a living as a shellfish poacher selling only one kind of shell. She massacred scallops on some of her other poaching runs. Scallops just happened to be the ones that got the special honor, probably because they were her first victims that helped her carve a niche in the black market.
I guess you'd know wouldn't you?
Guess she really doesn’t know the difference
@@shia1239 She's playing dumb because the California judges are easily persuaded to go soft on crime.
An 88k penalty must be an attempt to make up for all of the looting taking place in stores.
Meanwhile, they letting criminals out… seriously so dumb
Why did they take shells that obviously still have something alive inside?
Love of money, and a lack of a functional soul.
For the black market, they were of a critically threatened species of clam so it's a seller's market on their shells.
@@naomilevell9990 Two rather inane remarks, highlighting your, Naomi, actual lack of a functional soul. I bet you've never been a child, and were born already old, "wise", and bitter.)
Right. No way the mom is that dumb. She admitted herself she saw signs but did not take them that seriously. And look now, she has a tattoo as a reward to say I won the case. She didn’t learn a damn thing and probably still thinks she was right in the end of it all. That tattoo probably cost $500.
@@BEmeraldJadeShe thinks her tattoo is of a clam shell. I think she truly hadn't a clue.
Lol 72 clams ? Lmao she was gonna cook them at the hotel but got caught 😂 I call bs
Yes. Me too. This is some definite BS.
She would have had them in a bucket of cool water if she was going to do that, the heartless thug had every intention of causing them to die a slow horrible death and then throwing away a feast of clam meat every month while other Californians starved, so she could stupidly sell the shells on the black market for a fraction of the prices she could have gotten selling clams as food on the black market.
Mussells/Clams Steam until opened.
If one doesn't open, discard, then dip in melted butter 😋 I knew this at age 6 growing up on the coast.
agreed they were probably going to cook them, though 88K? they should have gotten a stern warning.
Yes! 72 is NOT just kids finding shells 🙄 they were digging.
I'm from this area, there are sandollars and occasionally abalone shells! Much more interesting than clams
Reading the comments and seems like people aren't understanding why the fines are excessive. They are that high to deter those who are willingly harvesting the clams illegally, mostly for commercial sale in restaurants and so on. Fining someone $500 for clams they can make thousands on in a commercial setting really isn't going to deter people from illegally harvesting them. Have to keep harvesting in check or there will be nothing to harvest. Hence, the huge fines.
Are there warning signs?
Worried about clams but not smash and grab.
72⁉️ That’s nonsense. I understand 2-3 clams or shells ,but 72 is crazy .
This is how hoarding starts!😊
The word is poaching!
That's professional poaching quantities is what it is. The judge who reduced the fine is a gullible idiot and the poacher is laughing at him all the way to the bank because she just made another 500 dollars this past week alone on another poaching trip while the judge was busy patting himself on the back for being so merciful.
Not if you are a CHILD and think they are just seashells. The officer could of taken the time to educate out of towners, had them put them back with a fair fine. Rotten public service in my opinion. Glad the judge reduced it to 500.00
@@cannkotlarz621 No, an entire family including an adult woman, with the children all different ages, didn't all miraculously mistake digging up live clams for gathering empty clam shells from the surface, and continue their mistake until they had 72 massacre victims, all under multiple signs in plain sight saying to LEAVE the critically threatened clam species ALONE. SHELLS INCLUDED by the way.
There’s no way they did not know those were not dead seashells.
We’ve gone to the beach maybe 5 times ever and that’s just in our state, not someone from out of town/state. Not everyone knows these laws or even what types of seashell species there are. I wouldn’t expect a clam to be a protected species. Her kids especially wouldn’t have known and mom may have never even touched them the kids just collected them. A fine of this amount for this is crazy. It’s not something like shooting a bald eagle that’s clearly wrong and everyone in the US would know. These are just shells on a beach. This is why discretion is so important.
@@alleycat616I think that’s the point, they’re not just shells. That’s why the fine was hefty. Plus they said there were signs which were ignored.
To be honest they don’t walk so very confused!!!!🫢🤫🔴
Yeah, I feel like her story is sugar coated. Trying to blame her kids, hoping she doesn't get in trouble. Don't you have to dig each one up(some over 1ft deep), and also be intentionally looking for the air hole above sand to know where to dig? I don't know how you accidentally do that 72 times.
I think it’s time to admit wildlife laws have gotten completely out of control, good intentions or not.
Kids look old enough to know what a clam is…. 🤯
You can tell they are clams....
There is a very big difference between a seashell and a clam. Those looked like littlenecks to me
people r stupid, clams know they are clams....people don't know they are clams!!....
ya think that really screwed up the balance of nature cause a few clams are taken from the ocean??....fk the big tough guy with the stern face " we have laws....bla, bla, bla"....get a life!
Sure, if you know what clams look like. I doubt many people from the Central Valley have much exposure to mollusks and shellfish other than what they order at Red Lobster, though.
Not everyone is a homosexual like you
@@meatpopsicle1567there was signs and she ignored them. They don’t care about the environment just their experience.
Umm…most persons collecting sea shells walk the beach. People clamming DIG for them - just as they appear to be doing in the video. Clamming has been banned at Pismo for a looong time.
I guess we’re lucky they didn’t pick up a sea turtle for its shell. 72 heavy live clams. I can see why the officer was skeptical of innocence.
72 clams, all similar in size, doesn't check what her kids are carrying in their buckets 😂 She totally knew what she was doing and just played dumb and blamed the kids.
She got a clam tattoo 🤦🤦♀️🤦♂️you can tell she's ditsy 🙄
She's a professional, and ditzy is a role she plays to get off with absurdly light fines like the 500 dollar fine she walked away with after getting caught this time. Also it's a scallop tattoo, meaning it was scallops she massacred to break into the black market selling poached seashells.
Eh not really. I'd get that tattoo on one arm and "88K" on the other. lol
Gtfo 72 clams? They knew what they were doing every adult knows seashells only have 1 half shouldve fined her 1k per kid🤣
Exactly. She's lying. I mean who the hell collects 72?
Felony animal abuse, 20 K per clam, plus 72 counts of poaching, plus 72 counts per child of contributing to the delinquency of a minor. But instead the monster got off with a total fine of only 500 bucks, a mere fraction of their profit from just one of her least profitable days of poaching, now the lesson she and her kids learned is crime DOES pay, a LOT.
@@ricksomethingx10000
@@ricksomething somebody with alotta uncooked pasta and short on red sauce......lol
$88K is crazy. 72 clams is crazy too. both parties dummies
Who takes home 70+ seashells ? She’s a liar and she knew they were clams. She showed a picture of them digging for them. She even had a Freudian slip when she said her kids were picking (clams) when she then said collecting seashells. The 88k fine was appropriate to serve as a warning so others don’t decimate the clam industry. People like her is why we have laws because people like her will never do right and the lie about it.
this reminds me of the drug distribution in our city, Vancouver, BC: the money goes into the back door, and out the front door the FIVE YEAR OLD delivers the drugs. Walks right by the cop car!!! BUT they're kids, so you ain't gonna do nuthin.
if she was illegal, they would have given her $88,000!
As well as the clams to eat.
What did they do with the clams? And she got a tattoo of a scallop.......she needs an ID book for animals.
She knows the names of the shellfish, she sells their shells on the black market.
Lol!!😂
A good lesson for her kids will be, don't get a tattoo herself for every situation in her life. Thanks God that her kids don't grabb sex toys illegally in a sex shop. I can't imagine the form of tattoo.
What's the big deal, I married a scallop myself and my love for her is printed over my back "Shelley Forever".
Why did they take so many?
Big family .
They need it many , 72 , to be satisfied for a dinner .
Because she's lying.
Money. Poaching is profitable, especially with pansy judges reducing the fine to less than 70 dollars per clam when she does get caught.
@@ryanray6215 Monster wasn't collecting them to eat, she was letting them die and letting the meat spoil.
probably because they were covering the beach.
Where was mom during the time it took for the kids to collect 72 clams?
I don't believe she didn't know. She probably figured she would take her chances.
Meanwhile, 4 blocks away someone is shooting up or shitting on a sidewalk..
1. 88K is ludicrous but it delivers a strong message 2. I don't buy that her kids ignored the signs and collected 72 identical (closed) clams, thinking they were interesting shells. 3. The judge reduced the fine to $500 which seems like the right amount. So message delivered without being too punitive.
Right. Her kids look old enough to know the difference between shells and actual clams. And the mom was definitely old enough to know the difference. How do people not know the difference? My parents taught me when I was old enough to be able to pick something up out of the sand on the beach, so probably when I was still a toddler. I have a hard time buying this too.
And she can now look back on it and laugh??! And get a tattoo! Wtf?!
These people were poaching and got caught, blamed it on the kids.
Worse, they recruited the kids, teaching their young impressionable minds that it's okay to massacre wild animals for fun and then lie about it.
You think so ? I never thought of that😮
@plicketyplunk yeah 100%
she saw the signs but " didn't pay attention". I'd say $500 dollars for poor parenting is about right. clams have to be dug up, seashells are on the surface of the sand and clearly don't contain a living animal , if this " my family is above the rules " mom cared.
Yeah I guess you would have enforced the 88,000 fine. Poor parenting, hmmm wonder who brought you up to be so compassionate an self entitled.
That is ridiculous any other fishermen would have been punished to the full extent of the law you're going to let him off 88,000 you don't care about the environment at all let's get that judge off the bench immediately
72 clams ? Yeah, "we thought they were just shells"
Pismo clams are heavy when alive, shells are empty and lightweight.
Let's lie to the Fish & Wildlife officials (Who have the most power of any agency in California) !
it was her kids that picked them up and they didn't know the difference.
She meant dinner
@@Tailss1two shells closed we all know it’s a clam. Half the shell it’s gone!
@@lindatohara6438 I wouldn't know the difference between clams and oysters myself - I wouldn't expect everyone else to either. Were the kids not given the option to return them to the beach instead of just fining the mom?
I believe the clams died out of water. However there is signs posted all over. A clamshell is smooth and the oyster is very bumpy. Easily identifiable for future reference
The kids in the picture (besides the youngest up front) look old enough to know the difference between a full clam and just a shell. Even if that isn't the case, the mom is definitely old enough to know the difference. Hell, she admitted to seeing a sign warning not to take clams and ignored it. And how many shells does a kid normally take home from the beach? One or two maybe, but 72 whole clams meaning 144 separate shells? Come on, that's at least 14 clams per kid! Also, the clams pictured on the tailgate were a dull brown, not "shiney" as the first reporter states. I'm not saying she used her kids to collect dinner and take the blame, but what I am saying is that I'm having a hard time believing this was an honest mistake...
14 clams per kid in a whole group of kids, you don't get that kind of harvest unless the adult is organizing or at least actively allowing the poaching on purpose for her own reasons. A small child might pick up one or two or three and try to figure out how to keep them alive in a bucket or a paper cup as pets, but she isn't gonna decide on her own, "Hey, I want to own 14 dead and rotting clam corpses so that I can keep 28 shells after the animals I killed finish rotting away." She's not even old enough to know unless someone tells her that the murdered clam will decompose and that the clam shell will stay behind. She's more likely to be just looking at the animal in its current state, and calling it whatever the adult says it is, and thinking that "collecting the seashells" means the live animal in front of her is called a "seashell" and she's gonna have a tank full of pet seashells at home. Poor kids had no idea that the animals would all die horrific deaths that day because of being "gathered" as "seashells". And who knows how many such trips to the beach this adult had previously organized before getting caught, and how many thousands of clams and other wildlife she's had massacred for her "collection"?
Kids aren’t required a fishing license in most states until 16 years of age 🤦🏻♂️
Remember when the bill of rights ment something? The 8th amendment says excessive fines are unconstitutional. They never should have even attempted an $88,000 fine. Our justice system needs to read the damn bill of rights.
Why did she let them collect living shellfish instead of obviously dead shells. How did this family not know what they were.
The mother knew, and innocent little children tend believe whatever their parents coach them to think. And apparently so do California judges.
From the valley probably. I live in San Luis Obispo and have seen such behavior since 1988. Lots of clueless people from Fresno and Bakersfield. Not All of them, but they are know for sure
Their from Fresno, says a lot.
There are signs on every beach, it's the parents responsibility to educate their children. The laws are in place for a reason. Ignorance and laziness not educate oneself and you offspring is not an excuse.
They allow pedophiles to walk away with a slap on the wrist and fine children for being children. This is disgusting.
Those don't look like shells. They look like clams. The clams were closed and buried. Tough lesson.
Washed up on shore? Why doesn't the government get bent, thinking they own everything and everyone? If it's a public beach and they are washed up on shore, they should be the public's as they please without a license needed.
@@haniotis3421Naw everyone can't just be allowed to take wildlife home. That's absurd. That's like you saying you can grab a tortoise cause it was "just on the ground"
@@TrentAdam Government can take all that tax money(because they have nothing better to do with it) and put the clams back in the water then. We're talking about clams on a public beach, not tortoises.
@@haniotis3421 It's the same concept though if everyone just walked up and took clams it would cause problems
@@haniotis3421you sound entitled with no respect for nature and wildlife. The government protects the beaches, keeps them clean and protects wildlife. You can’t take something just because you want to. You can’t walk anywhere you want. They were on that beach because the government allows them to. Simple. Be respectful of our land and creatures. Pack it in pack it out. Take your litter with you and leave the place better than when you arrived.
I bet they knew, & they were hoping to find pearls
Well if you want the valuable pearls I suggest you find oysters which are out in the ocean.
@@pmc2999 yes I am aware where oysters live, I was being sarcastic, because a fully closed clam does resembles an oyster
Thank God the judge had a brain and was reasonable!
Bro , the agent should be fired - giving kids a ticket for something they were unaware of and he has the nerve to get on camera 🎥
Why not? A chance to be interviewed and appear on air was too good a chance for Lt Gil Matthews to pass up. Little did he know that it only made him look ridiculous for applying the law mindlessly.
Not one of them look like sea shells! There are plenty of empty shells on the beach!
This mom has 5 chubby kids to feed. You know she sent them out on that beach to get some free food for dinner. She ain’t fooling anyone by playing dumb. She even admitted to seeing the signs.
Facts
Why are NON VIOLENT CRIMES punished so severely yet SA’ing or Domestic Violence get you a Slap on the Wrist?? 😤
Common sense should tell any judge to drop this fine
The entire system is simply broken.
Not the entirety. You don’t understand the problem here if that’s your response.
@@BEmeraldJade And your not looking at the big picture if that's your response......
@@BEmeraldJadeyou are right, not entirely but completely broken, a total disaster, like the wild west. I wouldn't be surprised if they bring back trial by combat.
@@shelbyseelbach9568 She fought it and the fine was reduced to $500 so why are you so bothered by it? The system worked exactly the way it was designed. They deserved to be charged and a $500 fine was very appropriate. If they become repeat offenders then $88K is appropriate. If the law were to always accept ignorance as an excuse then there'd be no clams left.
@@jimdent351 That you think this is how the system is supposed to work is the reason it will remain broken.
Of course the single mother gets a dumb tattoo to remind her of some inconvenience she had.
As the song "making poor decisions, really poor decisions". That's literally her life in a nutshell.
It's to brag about how pathetically small her pathetically few punishments are in her lucrative poaching business.
Such a huge crime picking up clams while humans are murdered everyday and law enforcement could care less.
A fine was appropriate, but not that amount. This was a $500 ticket and nothing more.
Absurd: Law enforcement has discretion. They don't have to write a citation. They could have used this moment to educate the family on what they did wrong. Thankfully the judge has some common sense.
500 dollars is still excessive for what was clearly an honest mistake.
Though i suppose it’s a lot more reasonable than a 90 thousand dollar fine.
Damn right they deserved a citation. There's no way they thought those were seashells and they took nearly 100.
@@mapl3mageIt's not clearly an honest mistake. It's actually pretty obvious what's a clam and what's a dead shell. Especially if you live by the ocean.
The mother knew what she did wrong. She did it, knowingly, and maliciously, for FUN.
@@mapl3mage Not a mistake, not at all honest, there was a sign right there saying not to dig up members of that protected wildlife species, 72 critically threatened clams were intentionally killed ON PURPOSE and the mother would have hauled off way more than 72 that day if the cop had not stopped her.
Meanwhile, you can break into the state from a foreign country and be given the literal keys to the city,and sanctuary from all laws!
So glad to see the fine reduced atleast. It was a genuine accident it happens. This is what warnings are for. Officers discretion is a thing..
Persecuting little kids and their parents and letting go real criminals that is insane!
To the reporters: You would KNOW if you accidentally took a live clam home bc you'd smell it a few days later...
Yes, and they are heavy and closed. The empty shells are open. 10 to 1 they did not smell because they ate them.
@@sdilluminatigrandfounder1813 They would have gotten food poisoning if they ate them, she had them laid out in the air and full sunlight to dry to death slowly. She would have put them straight into a bucket of cool water if she was poaching them for food. And they were mostly tiny. Most of them weren't even big enough to be worth the water to boil them for food. People only poach clams that size to kill them slowly and horribly like she was doing and then let them rot and then sell their shells as trinkets.
@@naomilevell9990 That's what she said. I tend not to believe her.
Showing off Tattoo 72 like it's a badge of honor to her is annoying, A tattoo with some kids around a clam would have been thoughtful. The rules exist for a reason, the next thing will be beaches closed off at certain times of the year because people think the rules don't apply to them. If her attitude is to laugh it off as no big thing, this is the lesson passed onto her impressionable children. Kids should be educated on why a species is important and for them to be left alone. We need children to learn to be the future stewards of nature wherever they encounter it. 88 clams x 10 families doing the same thing won't take long to decimate a population of sea creatures.
Jeez - I wish they fined people who abuse kids and animals this much!
Protecting clams on a public beach. A joke.
Talk about SHELL SHOCKED
Good one
The way I ran to the comments and scrolled for this. Thank you. 😂😊😅
Paying $88K would have been the real calamity.
More like a real "clamity". lol
This is one more example of how stupid our government is
When I was a kid and a young adult (many years ago) we used to go to Pismo exactly for the clams and we'd have clam bakes or bring the clams home and make chowder. It was great. BUT we knew the rules and didn't take below size clams or out of season, etc. We followed the rules.
Knowledge is power.
Anyone looking at what those kids picked up knows they were not empty shells. She will probably get a reduced fine.
Did you watch the video?
She DID get a SHOCKINGLY reduced fine, and yet there are criminal loving snowflakes here who think even 500 dollars for 72 counts of torturing wild animals to death, plus 72 counts per child of contributing to the delinquency of a minor, was an overly harsh punishment! That's less than 70 dollars per clam!
Protecting the enviroment should be taken seriously.
This is dumb. The average person has no clue about this. If they're so worried about clams being taken and ruining the situation, just close the beach. Or at a minimum, have a police officer there to watch people and educate them.
Clams has the right to defend itself
"Themselves "
Clams lives matter😂😂😂
Well that ain’t no clam dip
Sorry to say. But clams literally have no way of defending themselves.
That's absurd!! That they can't tell a live clam from a dead, half shell. Who's kidding who? The outrageous fine or the more outrageous lie?
I like how California can impose this law but perfectly okay with no bail for car burglary and some crimes 😂
This is absolutely ridiculous!!! How about you go after real criminals. Just don't vacation here anymore people this is excessive!!
YOUR court system. Disproportionate rulings ARE our specialty. The Judiciary....We HATE the middle class!
Less than 70 dollars per count of poaching, that's disproportionate all right. For 72 counts of poaching, with no evidence she was even going eat the stolen harvest either after causing 72 wild animals to die horrific deaths in her car FOR FUN, The judge who reduced the fine to 5 grand is a CRIMINAL. She not only did a wildly disproportionate amount of harm to the ecosystem, but she took a whole feast of clam meat out of the hands of professional poachers who would have fed their children with a feast of fresh shellfish and sold the rest to buy the other food for their children's meal. She wasn't stealing and killing out of hunger or desperation, she was stealing a feast of other people's food and and killing out of pure unbridled cruelty and selfishness, FOR FUN. 72 counts of poaching. 72 full portions of meat also intentionally spoiled. 72 counts of animal cruelty. Add to that 72 counts per child of contributing to the delinquency of a minor.
Incase you didn’t know Clams don’t have brains, they don’t have any of the human emotions that you are pretending they have including feeling pain. You have a right to an opinion but don’t make up pretend facts based on nothing but ignorance in order to make your case.
@@thegreenman2030 Me knowing more than you hurts your feelings? Oh, and having a decentralized nervous system instead of only one brain in only one place doesn't change the proven science fact that clams do feel pain.
@@thegreenman2030 Your information is based on reasonable hypotheses by seventeenth century biologists based on their observations of dead clams. My information is based on video footage of live clams from this century fighting, hunting, reproducing, fleeing from danger, recoiling from painful stimuli, exploring, exercising, etc. This is not a matter of opinion and the two sides of this conversation are in no way equal, your marine biology "knowledge" is just plain more than ninety years out of date.
@@naomilevell9990
Ffs. Someone in an unelected position thinks this is reasonable.
Those clams are there for the ecosystem. Humans need to stop messing with it
@@brentforrest123
Bot why?
@@brentforrest123 NO THE ARE THEIR TO DIG AND EAT