This is fake. Imagination. The electron microscopes we have today don't have the resolving power shown in this video. Science teachers nowadays teach, "Don't believe anything you can't see with your eyes." That's how they teach students to push out God.
Woah, pretty touching, I get it now, its like the blind people don't believe in light because they cant see it because they are blind and when you are blind you cant see light! So, did you find any proof?
It's even weirder when you realize how slowed down it is. Mildly terrifying (but kinda cool) to imagine all these little things stomping around in your cells.
@@teamet8317 you're comment is actually not wrong. As some of the earliest life forms or signs of life are thought to be DNA material, we may consider that any organisms purpose revolves around keeping the DNA material safe.
Oh shit, i just came here while reading the book "Immune" by Philipp Dettmer, founder of the channel Kurzgesagt (seriously everyone check them out if you havent). In it he states that the average protein moves at around 5 meters per second at room temp. At the scale of a protein, that's like us running as fast as a jet. So this little stomper is actually more like the flash...
Do you have a source for that? It could be even faster. Few people realise that inside the cell thing happen damn fast. For example the interaction between plasmin and fibrin is measured in pico-seconds. That is damn fast.
That's probably one the greatest discoveries, that there are little 'people' walking inside each one of our cells transporting cargo from one place to another.
@@TheFlyingSailorYT how this string of proteins “knows” where to go, when start / stop walking, how to return / change directions etc.? I am a layman, but it is incomprehensible for me how this all happen with coordination with dozens of different things going on at the same time in cell.
@@mioszbies903because there's only one path and it's attracted by the positive end of the microtubule. like a paper clip attracted to a magnet and paper clip does not need to "think" lol
@@atailiaaymen4736 I was created by my parents, who were created by their parents, and so on an so fourth going back billions of years to the first simple life to form randomly in the primordial ooze. Seriously, evolution is not that complicated. And God, especially the Christian God or any other worldly God made up by humans almost certainly doesn't exist. Sorry to science your question away. It wasn't hard to do.
Alien refers to anything forigen to a specific place. These motor proteins were made by our cells and are technically more like citizens of our cells working to transport materials to other parts of the cell.
i remember watching this when i was in 7th grade thinking how cool it looked like and this was the point i decided that i want to be a biologist. a few days ago my cellbio prof showed us this video during the lecture and it has really torn up some memories
This is amazing. I never thought to wonder what the inner workings of a cell even looked like? But thinking about it, of course there would be. There's so much going on inside a cell there that there has to be a visual landscape surrounding the action. I never expected it to be so other worldly looking, but why not? It certainly wouldn't look like anything we've ever seen on this earth if I'd ever thought about it...at least I'd hope not. Thanks for sharing!
A nice animation showing the co-operation between the microtube and kinesin. I like how the heads of the kinesin molecule resemble boots in this video!
I recall when this form of movement was first discovered or at least settled. It felt to me when I was watching this as a younger child what I imagine it would've felt like to watch the moon landing as it was happening, something so far out of my perception and understanding presented in such a short form and mind blowing way. This has for some reason stuck with me for a very long time, now that I'm finally studying and putting my comprehension to the test I will realise the curiosity that this video sparked inside me all those years ago.
im just starting to study biology and i think this is amazing! when i read about the kinesin a motor protein walking...I was like WTF is he shure did i just read that? is that book right...and then i just watched this video and opened my mind wider...I mean WOW LIFE! :)
There must be something wrong with me I can't stop laughing everytime i watch this animation, since the very first time our professor showed it to us XD
On this comment, I broadly agree with you. Naturalistic mechanisms should be considered first. Having said that, if there is a strong appearance of intelligent design, the possibility of actual intelligent design should not be ruled out a priori. True science should be open to all reasonable possibilities. If a design inference is made wrongly, or in haste, then the doors should be left open for the design hypothesis to be refuted in turn by providing a compelling naturalistic explanation
The 'reading mechanism' in living cells is the ribosome. Craig Venter, who is not as you know an ID proponent, suggested that if he was, he would choose the ribosome as his icon of irreducible complexity. Ribosomes are notoriously difficult to simplify. Even the simplest ribosomes consist of dozens of proteins as well as RNA molecules. Protein manufacture requires information and ribosomes, ribosomes are made from multiple proteins. This is a classic chicken and egg scenario.
+Dale Dunn It depends. It could be heading to the plasma membrane to fuse with it and release it's contents or anywhere else to release the proteins/lipids.
Dale Dunn considering the vesicle has what appears to be ribosomes on the surface it is probably headed to the Golgi Apparatus from the rough endoplasmic reticulum.
this video if anything is an example of how random events generate functional things. The biochemistry of why kinesis walks toward + end of microtubules is fully understood, there in nothing driving it other than chemistry, also from analysis of the genes used to produce such proteins (highly conserved throughout species in perfect accordance with the evolutionary fossil record) to the scientific method used to reveal its structure and dynamics, firmly stand in the camp of stochastic events created all that there is, and absolutely no need or evidence for a creator, other than for wtf was the singularity doing there in the first place, but that is the same question as who made god, mysteries persist.
+Poseid Atlantean it's not arrogance it's evidence based biochemistry. Reciting verifiable data about a mechanical occurrence has absolutely nothing to do with arrogance, I'm merely transmitting knowledge. Ignorance does not equal humility and knowledge does not equal arrogance. If you have opposing evidence, present it, if not, you have nothing to add to the discussion.
+Poseid Atlantean the spiritual is by definition not part of the natural universe. Nature is incredibly mysterious, with vast unknowns- living with that mystery is what represents a strong mind in the face of the unknown, ascribing the mysterious to some supernatural deity or spiritual force, ie the most simple explanations that soothe the frightened human heart- is an example of not being able to sit with uncertainty, and is thus weakness. The religious/spiritual are the ones clutching onto fantastical explanations fervently out of their fear of death, their fear of being cast adrift in a cold universe without answers, their fear of nobody actually knowing their subjective life, or really caring about them. The religious and spiritual represents the worst of man's ego, which is why the religious kill or convert ppl who don't think like them, or in your case, try to scoff at other ideas, in a weak attempt to write them off. This is also why the spiritual set absolutely misuses the ideas of quantum mechanics to twist them into a type of manifestation for their own consciousness- as if the universe complies to a tiny human will. It doesn't. Death is the end of consciouness, it is entirely within the brain- and controlled by the thalamus, hence why it makes us sleep everynight and why anesthetic works. This quantum misabuse is the modern equivalent to the notion that the earth is at the center of the universe, now it's our mind-this is weak human emotional desire driving this mumbo jumbo, nothing more. This all stems from a double slit experiment which ONLY has to do with things at their smallest level, and is only the copenhagen interpretation anyway, hence the rift in quantum and macro physics. In the case of this little kinesin molecule there are very simple molecular biochemical charge differences driving it along, utterly simple and verifiable, and have nothing to do with any metaphysics. The questions of why the universe is and why charge exists at all in one of the mysteries of the universe that i find exciting. Those very same you are unable to live with. There is no evidence for any one religion to be true, and mountains against it, there is no serious quantum physicist who believes that we create our own reality in the macro plane. YOU end at death, your molecules will persist, the sun will explode and erase every record of human existence from the earth, there is no being that creates fairness (in afterlife or karmic) in the universe, things are random and viruses have just as much right to exist as us-the product of chance- and when one wipes out 15 million like the spanish flu in 1915-the universe couldn't care less. That's the deal and I like it just as little as you. I'm just willing to accept it.
+Poseid Atlantean lol no. Newtons third law is about dynamics of energy. You are twisting it into meaninglessness. Yes everything you do will have some reaction but none of it will have to do with justice, or goodness or anything else, those are value judgements, inventions of humanity. I actually don't believe life is meaningless, I live with incredible meaning and purpose, I am a 3rd yr medical student going to practice with the underserved, I volunteer every week. These things are meaningful to me and my sense of beauty, but that is my own invention and my own value system, and I don;t care if the universe doesn't care, I'm going to live on my values either way. So your argument is moot, I don;t in any way feel let off the hook for anything. I also referenced mystery a number of times, so I do not end with what science can explain, another straw man. Again I just accept the mystery. All the rest and the secret insight you think you have is just wishful thinking. I get it, but it's as false as any of the 100,000 religions, gods, and other supernatural mumbo jumbo ppl invent to not be so afraid in the dark. Me, I think looking into the mystery of the universe is liberating and equalizing. Nobody is saved, nobody is a sinner, nobody is blessed, and nobody cursed. We can all travel around on this rock and share our impressions non-dogmatically, in this brief time we have. Without pretending we'll live forever, or that good deeds always result in good reactions, or that innocent children don't die randomly because the universe doesn't prize a human life over a bacteria or virus. I will be a doctor in 1 year remember, I am not saying I don't make the distinction, but the universe clearly does not.
there are real energy cycles, and made up ones. Certainly ideas spread etc. But thoughts come from action potentials making different shapes in your brain, that is their form of energy, electrochemical, this energy comes from neuron metabolism, mostly from oxidative metabolism from the citric acid cycle, this creates the ATP neurons use by oxidizing oxygen molecules, these get pumped up to your brain through cerebral arteries, clinging to hemoglobin in your blood, it attached to hemoglobin when you breathed, and was a byproduct of plant metabolism. The same time you breathed that breath that attached that oxygen to your erythrocytes, you offloaded CO2, a by product of your metabolism. That is what plants use to make glucose, resulting in the oxygen that gave you the energy, in the form of oxidative potential energy, to have thoughts. That is the energy cycle, it's beautiful and real. This bullshit about manifesting reality is however, not.
no it doesn't actually. It's a bunch of random charges that interact with the microtubule molecules and was brought together by complete random chemistry, as was every single biological system. Evolution is an absolute fact, this is an evolved system.
We have known for decades, since Francis Crick cracked the genetic code and revealed his 'sequence hypothesis', that information runs the show in living cells. The highly specific sequencing of DNA, such that functional proteins are generated is in no way dependent on preferential chemical bonding, the laws of physics or chance etc. It is instead derived from information contained in the gametes. I have yet to see such information arising naturally.
@@pietajunior3437 In 1910 Ivan Panin, a Russian/ American Harvard math genius and linguistic expert, proved the Bible mathematically. Watch - Math proves the Bible. Most recently a 30 year veteran cold case criminologist J. Warner Wallace proved the Bible forensically in his book, Person of Interest. His testimony would convince any jury of the veracity of the Bible. Some of the amazing things in the Bible include the prophecy of the fall of Tyre and the prophecy of Alexander the great. Bible firsts include knowing life being in the blood long before modern science, or the Bible knowing about mountains and currents in the oceans or how the earth hangs on nothing. You should know about the prophecies fulfilled by Jesus and the impossible odds of that happening. The Bible is a reliable collection of historical documents written down by eye witnesses during the lifetime of other eye witnesses. They report to us supernatural events that took place in fulfillment of specific prophecies and claim that the writings are divine rather than human in origin. The Bible has also been proven archaeologically, historically and linguistically. 2 Peter 1:16 For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.
Some interesting comments here. I am interested to get an explanation of the scientific evidence (or a link to it) for the formation of the first "simple" cell. While studying some micro-biology I became perplexed how (considering the irreducible complexity of a "simple" cell containing Information wrapped up in the DNA that overlaps and in fact has information also stored in reverse over the same locus that contains coded start and stop delimiters to enable RNA process of copying information from the DNA to make the proteins that are transported by the Kinesin, along with the ability to reproduce itself)) was formed given only time and chance, yet alone the added information contained in the DNA "blueprint" to produce traits and other appendages feathers, muscles nerves and a control system with feedback to operate the wings and other appendages. Some keep pointing to natural selection and mutation but these processes explain screening of traits that already exist and not how they existed in the first place or gained information to result in more kinds of species. I want to see the evidence for how these cells could have come about in the first place.
No you aren't interested, no one that is would use the creationist bs term like 'irreducible complexity' unless they're creationist already even now you're assuming that cells started with the same mechanism they use now, completely incapable of ever grasping the idea that it would not be the case in reality and demonstrating your nonexistent grasp of evolution maybe read about simple self-replicating molecules if you're really interested
Someone said: "You don't see/hear about a real scientist turning religious because of scientific research". Brian May (formerly the guitarist with Queen) became a professor of astrophysics. When asked about God he said he's not a Christian, but he felt that the "position" that God doesn't exist is hard to defend. I think that's an example of science "driving" faith. My main question for the evolution group is this: Which developed first, the function or the information that defines the function? It would have to be information, would it not? To answer that, I personally have to come back to the whole ID thing. Not palatable for some, I know.
Issue here is that humanity is naturally inclined to want a god. Generically it happens again and again in every civilisation and its statements like this that prove this. Brian May while he studied some stuff, ( because that is what an academic award is ) has not stated any proof that God is actually something other than imagined by human beings. he just feels that the position or opinion that god doesn't exist is hard to defend. There is no reference in that referring to showing how he does exist. Show me dude.. go on... cough it up... but he can't or else he would have. Proof is so much stronger an argument than "its hard to defend"
I think you're misunderstanding what DNA is if you think it intrinsically holds information, you could make a case on a particle physics level there MAY be some intrinsic form of information in said particles. DNA is made up of molecules, molecules have tendencies of attaching and making reactions with other molecules based on properties of the atoms that compose it, these reactions are "read" and "replicated" for the "construction" of other proteins, because the "replicated code" attracts other said molecules to make proteins. That does not mean it intrinsically holds information, information as scientists know it today is the mathematical data we retain digitally, or synaptically in our brains, or corresponding with writing in a book or paper, you'd have to assume that math is an unseen, unheard, intrinsic part of the universe, instead of a very useful tool for describing the universe with abstract terms. Also, why does it have to be information first? you just assume that it does. like I said before, DNA does not intrinsically (it might, but asserting that it does doesn't help) contain info, we just ascribe it to that because we automatically assign information to anything that triggers our synapses when we look or think about it. If a rock on my table is used as a paperweight, did it intrinsically have the information to have the function of a paperweight? Or did we assign it that because the paperweights we design with an intended purpose in mind carry dense mass quantities? it sounds to me with asserted the rock has a function despite it clearly not being made for that. And what if said rock were to roll off (let's say it was an earthquake) the table and manages to wedge itself on my open door, who it suddenly stop being a paperweight and then a door-stop? both? it probably is just a rock in a particular situation that wouldn't even HAVE a function if we didn't assign it to it. This is how the new parts of evolution work too, random parts are either modified or changed in some way or added with a genetic mutation, but function comes first, since it's usually random. Irregardless of all of this, even if information came first for parts I don't jump to ID for this, I'd just go for god assisted evolution, which is far more reasonable and based less upon personal biases. Also just saying one example of a guy who became a scientist does not an argument make, the position that god does, or does not, exists, as in a positive claim about a being who is supposedly unknowable, is a stupid thing to try and assert, asserting one does exist is stupid becuase little evidence supports that it in anyway interferes with our world, and saying one doesn't exist is just as stupid because we have no way of knowing whether or not he's just there but hiding or just made us and watches for interest. For me I have studied physics, biology, neurology, computer science, chemistry, psychology, genetics, probability, calculus etc and come to the conclusion that the God Concept has a very VERY low chance of actually having any truth behind it., that's my position, about 0.01% chance of it being true in my mind, so I might as well discard the idea as being factual in any way whatsoever.
Absolutely, Tom! Information is one insurmountable obstacle to any evolutionary scenario. Where did it all come from? How was it encoded into DNA and RNA? How did it find its way into the epigenome? Evolution cannot explain this. Blessings, JR
Tom Muckian I suggest you read Darwin's origin of species, you would gain a bit of insight about this subject, things that appear designed are actually a series of natural selections of random genetic mutations, out of randomness comes design with purpose, that is survive and perpetuate the information further, each time new genetic mutation, each time filtering what's not helpful and perpetuating what is. That is not not proof of the existence or non-existence of divinity, myself am an agnostic, however, what this understanding does is explain how things that appear designed by a creator are not necessarily so. Again, I'm not denying the existence of a divinity, a creator or whatnot.
In cases were the data isn't there, I'm ready to admit that there is overconfidence, but when I dig deeper I find other scientists who approach the same problems with a healthy respect for data. The article on the exploration of protein fitness landscapes was informative. I'm learning to what extend these techniques are been applied to ribosomes. For instance, Ada Yonath is working on engineering a working proto-ribosome based on experiments in mutagenesis.
When one understands the outrageous degree of complexity and interdependence of the cells components, the improbability of a mindless naturalistic mechanism seeking out and stumbling across them is easily apparent.These animations amaze people who have grown up in a culture that assumes we are accidental byproducts of nature, despite the fact that they are gross simplifications of actual cells. Future animations capturing the cells excruciating detail will be a final nail in the Darwinian coffin
OK, I have to say that if it moves exactly that way in real life, as it does in the animation... It really, really seems like it - and many other cell parts - are actually self-aware and have a purpose...
LOL. This is nothing to do with religious books. While the scientific discovery of intelligent design might be friendly to some religions (like Theism) and unfriendly to others (like atheism), the scientific evidence speaks for itself, and the scientific evidence says "intelligent design"
Repent Your Sins i can't? Have you ever read a book of biology? It's full of proofs. But i actually can't see any proof of the existence of god. Have you ever met him?
Stephanoceros fimbriatus Information cannot be created by chance, and this design required a massive amount of information. God is the only logical explanation. If you try to reproduce natural selection/mutation processes on a computer simulation, you realize that it never lead to complex machines like this one. It only produces worthless noise.
ATP is the energy currency of cells. Proteins were formulated within a similar way to adenine and ATP. Amino acids were formed by amines (such as ammonia) and carboxylic acid. Polymers of such amino acids are formed through what is known as a ''nucleophilic attack'' by the amino group of an amino acid at the electrophilic carbonyl carbon of the carboxyl group of another amino acid. Without catalysts, these polymers slowly formed globular molecules known as proteins.
everybody gangsta till the protein start walkin
Best of
th-cam.com/video/nWheYE6IsI4/w-d-xo.html
@Tyler Nadeau-Lewis Best of
th-cam.com/video/nWheYE6IsI4/w-d-xo.html
I'd never seen a protein with that much level of swag in my entire life... science...
This is fake. Imagination. The electron microscopes we have today don't have the resolving power shown in this video. Science teachers nowadays teach, "Don't believe anything you can't see with your eyes." That's how they teach students to push out God.
goosecouple prove to me god is real
@@centeroftheuniverse7196 The other day I saw a bunch of blind people trying to disprove the existence of light.
Woah, pretty touching, I get it now, its like the blind people don't believe in light because they cant see it because they are blind and when you are blind you cant see light!
So, did you find any proof?
@Center of the univserse Did you see the "light" ?
so the vibe truly has been inside of us this whole time
Exactly!
I would like this but I can't
It's even weirder when you realize how slowed down it is. Mildly terrifying (but kinda cool) to imagine all these little things stomping around in your cells.
Imagine if every cell in your body made Sr. Pelo-esque stomping noises at all times
@@teamet8317 you're comment is actually not wrong. As some of the earliest life forms or signs of life are thought to be DNA material, we may consider that any organisms purpose revolves around keeping the DNA material safe.
Зачётный комментарий👍
Oh shit, i just came here while reading the book "Immune" by Philipp Dettmer, founder of the channel Kurzgesagt (seriously everyone check them out if you havent). In it he states that the average protein moves at around 5 meters per second at room temp. At the scale of a protein, that's like us running as fast as a jet. So this little stomper is actually more like the flash...
@@eYe3wOrLdwow!
Our professor from university put this in his presentation with “Stayin’ Alive” playing in the background. It was AMAZING.
must be nice🧑🏼🎓
Its so perfect xD
That explains why I was hearing, ‘you tell by the way I walk…’ in my head.
@@ksr55555 😄🖖👍
Listening to "Stayin' Alive" and watching this.
whenever you think no one loves you, just remember this guy is out there
Or in there😊
Keep in mind that saying that there are a lot of this "guy" is an understatement.
How sweet.
It's a machine...
This animation is slowed down by a lot. It walks about 100 times faster in real life (~80 steps per second)
Do you have a source for that? It could be even faster. Few people realise that inside the cell thing happen damn fast. For example the interaction between plasmin and fibrin is measured in pico-seconds. That is damn fast.
@@raresvasc107 Holy shit the site that I linked has a lot more mind-blowing stuff about the scale of biology. Thank you for making me find it lol
@@JD-jl4yy Damn, I want to see as well. Paste the link.
@@JD-jl4yy the link was probably auto-removed do you have the name of the site?
He zooming
Ain't nothin gonna break its stride.
LOL!! 😄
+Red Runge Why are you not at the top?
Ain't nothin gonna slow it down
Oh no
Well, tangles sure would
this inspires me so much
literally how can i ever repay their kindness
i wish i could give them a hug :'(
no 🧢
thank God for that
drink enough water and eat foods that nourish them 👍
@@Action-DZI thank evolution, random selection and my parents✋
@@playerslayer5539 until you prove evolution in real life then ..
That's probably one the greatest discoveries, that there are little 'people' walking inside each one of our cells transporting cargo from one place to another.
Not really a person.
More a string of protiens that when assembled behave like a tiny machine.
@@TheFlyingSailorYT oh really, i thought there was another sentient little guy inside me all this time
@@TheFlyingSailorYT 😲🤡🤓
@@TheFlyingSailorYT how this string of proteins “knows” where to go, when start / stop walking, how to return / change directions etc.? I am a layman, but it is incomprehensible for me how this all happen with coordination with dozens of different things going on at the same time in cell.
@@mioszbies903because there's only one path and it's attracted by the positive end of the microtubule. like a paper clip attracted to a magnet and paper clip does not need to "think" lol
The Little Protein That Could
You're Bad,Lol
If god exists, it is him.
@@sploofmcsterra4786
If u think that god isn't exist how are u created? From a virus or from nothing?
@@IllusionDX lol random
can you randomly make a cpu out of nothing ?
@@atailiaaymen4736 I was created by my parents, who were created by their parents, and so on an so fourth going back billions of years to the first simple life to form randomly in the primordial ooze. Seriously, evolution is not that complicated. And God, especially the Christian God or any other worldly God made up by humans almost certainly doesn't exist. Sorry to science your question away. It wasn't hard to do.
The only thing that blows my mind more than this is trying to understand how the f*** evolution reached this degree of complexity
With a little help from the Creator of the universe.
layers upon layers upon layers upon layers for billions of years.
debbie94510 It took literally one post to get a response from a batshit.
Carl Gustaf Rehnskiöld
You spelled lies wrong.
Is it possible the reason it is hard to understand evolution reaching this degree of complexity is.... because it can't from pond scum?
We have the cutest aliens in our bodies.
***** Alien? It seems more like a Pokemon.
***** I know, but it looks like an alien. :D
It's not inside of you; it's _part_ of you
Alien refers to anything forigen to a specific place. These motor proteins were made by our cells and are technically more like citizens of our cells working to transport materials to other parts of the cell.
i think this comment was meant to be more flippant?
One must imagine kinesin happy.
This is the cutest thing EVER I love biology
habbibi i love you too👩❤️💋👩
@@lg690 lmfao
dayum girl! She struttin! What heels she use 😍😩👌👏👀
Best of
th-cam.com/video/nWheYE6IsI4/w-d-xo.html
i remember watching this when i was in 7th grade thinking how cool it looked like and this was the point i decided that i want to be a biologist. a few days ago my cellbio prof showed us this video during the lecture and it has really torn up some memories
damn
Why do I find this so cuuute
That protein walks with so much class, better than me 😂😂
this must be easy
that protein is such a hussler
Than*
@@matteifroelich1711 fix it 🤣
Play this but with Bees Gees "Stayin Alive" in the background.
+Madison Johnson That's what I heard in my head too! media.giphy.com/media/eYJhQcprr3bTa/giphy.gif
Listen to Hocico , not human .
th-cam.com/video/eEFyPbsXdN0/w-d-xo.html
I wish someone made an entire molecular music video to that song
Best of
th-cam.com/video/nWheYE6IsI4/w-d-xo.html
"Well you can tell by the way I use my walk I'm a woman's man, no time to talk"
It’s doing such a good job 🥺 it looks like its wearing little shoes. I love you kinesin keep up the good work lil homie
Plug walk
dude has swag. you gotta give him that.
I have watched this vid like a million times and it never fails to delight me
Long road, but someone's gotta walk it.
This is amazing. I never thought to wonder what the inner workings of a cell even looked like? But thinking about it, of course there would be. There's so much going on inside a cell there that there has to be a visual landscape surrounding the action. I never expected it to be so other worldly looking, but why not? It certainly wouldn't look like anything we've ever seen on this earth if I'd ever thought about it...at least I'd hope not. Thanks for sharing!
Whilst watching this, I'm reminded of the walking broomsticks in the mickey mouse segment of Fantasia 2000
APS129 lol
walks like a boss
my gf was asking me why I haven’t answered her text in 24 hours but I was busy wondering what kinesin protein was up too
This is why I study Biology! The human body and what happens in side our cells is amazing.
I spent ten minutes in AP bio laughing at this animation with my lab partners
I know it’s hilarious 😂
Wow that protein has way more confidence than I do
Probably because you can't lift hundreds of times your own weight.
A nice animation showing the co-operation between the microtube and kinesin. I like how the heads of the kinesin molecule resemble boots in this video!
When a molecule walks cooler than you
That is absolutely gorgeous!
The silence lets me choose my own beat.
I am intrigued by this walking protect with accurate and calculated steps. I just had to learn and watch more.
My god...it walks like a pearson😂
Oh Jesus its so funny, nice and cute❤️
that motor protein never skipped leg day
i might unironically join this fandom omg this is so immersive
I recall when this form of movement was first discovered or at least settled. It felt to me when I was watching this as a younger child what I imagine it would've felt like to watch the moon landing as it was happening, something so far out of my perception and understanding presented in such a short form and mind blowing way. This has for some reason stuck with me for a very long time, now that I'm finally studying and putting my comprehension to the test I will realise the curiosity that this video sparked inside me all those years ago.
This is so cute. ;___;
I came from adult swim's "still lost I guess, here's a tunnel"
im just starting to study biology and i think this is amazing! when i read about the kinesin a motor protein walking...I was like WTF is he shure did i just read that? is that book right...and then i
just watched this video and opened my mind wider...I mean WOW LIFE! :)
It's what gives us HAPPINESS. How HUMOUROUS is our God! :)
There must be something wrong with me I can't stop laughing everytime i watch this animation, since the very first time our professor showed it to us XD
this dude is the main character and they know it
On this comment, I broadly agree with you. Naturalistic mechanisms should be considered first. Having said that, if there is a strong appearance of intelligent design, the possibility of actual intelligent design should not be ruled out a priori. True science should be open to all reasonable possibilities. If a design inference is made wrongly, or in haste, then the doors should be left open for the design hypothesis to be refuted in turn by providing a compelling naturalistic explanation
My biology teacher calls it “a toddler wearing high tops”
The 'reading mechanism' in living cells is the ribosome. Craig Venter, who is not as you know an ID proponent, suggested that if he was, he would choose the ribosome as his icon of irreducible complexity. Ribosomes are notoriously difficult to simplify. Even the simplest ribosomes consist of dozens of proteins as well as RNA molecules. Protein manufacture requires information and ribosomes, ribosomes are made from multiple proteins. This is a classic chicken and egg scenario.
If you think your job is hard, just look at that little guy
The exaggerated swagger of a Kinsein
This is truly amazing.
My doctor showed me that today. I was amazed that it appeared to walk.
Thanks Dr. Dennett!
This feels like it has meme potential
Aye, that protein be walkin, deadass 🅱️ 🔥🔥🔥
Sooooo, where's he heading out to?
+Dale Dunn The Gym lol
+Dale Dunn It depends. It could be heading to the plasma membrane to fuse with it and release it's contents or anywhere else to release the proteins/lipids.
+Simone Hawira :D
Dale Dunn with that level of swagger i'd say the dancefloor.
Dale Dunn considering the vesicle has what appears to be ribosomes on the surface it is probably headed to the Golgi Apparatus from the rough endoplasmic reticulum.
Bruh the protein walkin' 😳
Amazing! This is like another world...
this is so incredible i want to cry
pussy
suchandsuchfilms No...It's a kinesin. Gonna have to brush up a bit on biology there bud!
JayTwo why? I only took biology in high school and I don't need any of it to make six figures in IT. lol
suchandsuchfilms Gotta reach that American Dream right babe?
JayTwo sure do, honeycup
Love the second article. Perhaps they can use pit different bacteria against each other to develop novel antibiotics.
That’s adorable.
This walking kinesin protein is the best thing I've seen since the beginning of 2024
I fucking love science *-*
Everybody gangsta till the protein starts walking
That's a person.
That's a whole dude.
Look at him go.
i'm dying to see how cute this is
this video if anything is an example of how random events generate functional things. The biochemistry of why kinesis walks toward + end of microtubules is fully understood, there in nothing driving it other than chemistry, also from analysis of the genes used to produce such proteins (highly conserved throughout species in perfect accordance with the evolutionary fossil record) to the scientific method used to reveal its structure and dynamics, firmly stand in the camp of stochastic events created all that there is, and absolutely no need or evidence for a creator, other than for wtf was the singularity doing there in the first place, but that is the same question as who made god, mysteries persist.
+Poseid Atlantean it's not arrogance it's evidence based biochemistry. Reciting verifiable data about a mechanical occurrence has absolutely nothing to do with arrogance, I'm merely transmitting knowledge. Ignorance does not equal humility and knowledge does not equal arrogance. If you have opposing evidence, present it, if not, you have nothing to add to the discussion.
+Poseid Atlantean the spiritual is by definition not part of the natural universe. Nature is incredibly mysterious, with vast unknowns- living with that mystery is what represents a strong mind in the face of the unknown, ascribing the mysterious to some supernatural deity or spiritual force, ie the most simple explanations that soothe the frightened human heart- is an example of not being able to sit with uncertainty, and is thus weakness. The religious/spiritual are the ones clutching onto fantastical explanations fervently out of their fear of death, their fear of being cast adrift in a cold universe without answers, their fear of nobody actually knowing their subjective life, or really caring about them. The religious and spiritual represents the worst of man's ego, which is why the religious kill or convert ppl who don't think like them, or in your case, try to scoff at other ideas, in a weak attempt to write them off. This is also why the spiritual set absolutely misuses the ideas of quantum mechanics to twist them into a type of manifestation for their own consciousness- as if the universe complies to a tiny human will. It doesn't. Death is the end of consciouness, it is entirely within the brain- and controlled by the thalamus, hence why it makes us sleep everynight and why anesthetic works. This quantum misabuse is the modern equivalent to the notion that the earth is at the center of the universe, now it's our mind-this is weak human emotional desire driving this mumbo jumbo, nothing more.
This all stems from a double slit experiment which ONLY has to do with things at their smallest level, and is only the copenhagen interpretation anyway, hence the rift in quantum and macro physics. In the case of this little kinesin molecule there are very simple molecular biochemical charge differences driving it along, utterly simple and verifiable, and have nothing to do with any metaphysics. The questions of why the universe is and why charge exists at all in one of the mysteries of the universe that i find exciting. Those very same you are unable to live with. There is no evidence for any one religion to be true, and mountains against it, there is no serious quantum physicist who believes that we create our own reality in the macro plane. YOU end at death, your molecules will persist, the sun will explode and erase every record of human existence from the earth, there is no being that creates fairness (in afterlife or karmic) in the universe, things are random and viruses have just as much right to exist as us-the product of chance- and when one wipes out 15 million like the spanish flu in 1915-the universe couldn't care less. That's the deal and I like it just as little as you. I'm just willing to accept it.
+Poseid Atlantean lol no. Newtons third law is about dynamics of energy. You are twisting it into meaninglessness. Yes everything you do will have some reaction but none of it will have to do with justice, or goodness or anything else, those are value judgements, inventions of humanity. I actually don't believe life is meaningless, I live with incredible meaning and purpose, I am a 3rd yr medical student going to practice with the underserved, I volunteer every week. These things are meaningful to me and my sense of beauty, but that is my own invention and my own value system, and I don;t care if the universe doesn't care, I'm going to live on my values either way. So your argument is moot, I don;t in any way feel let off the hook for anything. I also referenced mystery a number of times, so I do not end with what science can explain, another straw man. Again I just accept the mystery. All the rest and the secret insight you think you have is just wishful thinking. I get it, but it's as false as any of the 100,000 religions, gods, and other supernatural mumbo jumbo ppl invent to not be so afraid in the dark. Me, I think looking into the mystery of the universe is liberating and equalizing. Nobody is saved, nobody is a sinner, nobody is blessed, and nobody cursed. We can all travel around on this rock and share our impressions non-dogmatically, in this brief time we have. Without pretending we'll live forever, or that good deeds always result in good reactions, or that innocent children don't die randomly because the universe doesn't prize a human life over a bacteria or virus. I will be a doctor in 1 year remember, I am not saying I don't make the distinction, but the universe clearly does not.
there are real energy cycles, and made up ones. Certainly ideas spread etc. But thoughts come from action potentials making different shapes in your brain, that is their form of energy, electrochemical, this energy comes from neuron metabolism, mostly from oxidative metabolism from the citric acid cycle, this creates the ATP neurons use by oxidizing oxygen molecules, these get pumped up to your brain through cerebral arteries, clinging to hemoglobin in your blood, it attached to hemoglobin when you breathed, and was a byproduct of plant metabolism. The same time you breathed that breath that attached that oxygen to your erythrocytes, you offloaded CO2, a by product of your metabolism. That is what plants use to make glucose, resulting in the oxygen that gave you the energy, in the form of oxidative potential energy, to have thoughts. That is the energy cycle, it's beautiful and real. This bullshit about manifesting reality is however, not.
no it doesn't actually. It's a bunch of random charges that interact with the microtubule molecules and was brought together by complete random chemistry, as was every single biological system. Evolution is an absolute fact, this is an evolved system.
i came to understand what this was, only to find hate, wtf..
Sephìroth Nikolai Krampus im so confused 😣
It's so adorable!
We have known for decades, since Francis Crick cracked the genetic code and revealed his 'sequence hypothesis', that information runs the show in living cells. The highly specific sequencing of DNA, such that functional proteins are generated is in no way dependent on preferential chemical bonding, the laws of physics or chance etc. It is instead derived from information contained in the gametes. I have yet to see such information arising naturally.
it's absolutely stupid to deny that there is Creator
Why.
@@pietajunior3437
In 1910 Ivan Panin, a Russian/ American Harvard math genius and linguistic expert, proved the Bible mathematically. Watch - Math proves the Bible. Most recently a 30 year veteran cold case criminologist J. Warner Wallace proved the Bible forensically in his book, Person of Interest. His testimony would convince any jury of the veracity of the Bible. Some of the amazing things in the Bible include the prophecy of the fall of Tyre and the prophecy of Alexander the great. Bible firsts include knowing life being in the blood long before modern science, or the Bible knowing about mountains and currents in the oceans or how the earth hangs on nothing. You should know about the prophecies fulfilled by Jesus and the impossible odds of that happening. The Bible is a reliable collection of historical documents written down by eye witnesses during the lifetime of other eye witnesses. They report to us supernatural events that took place in fulfillment of specific prophecies and claim that the writings are divine rather than human in origin. The Bible has also been proven archaeologically, historically and linguistically.
2 Peter 1:16 For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.
so basically, this is what happiness looks like ? :D
Why would you say that?
Because the chemicals released are endorphins.. that make us feel "joy" and "happiness" so, that's why. lol
but this video has NOTHING to do with endorphins?
No more like metabolism
@@javiere.gonzalez1021 also the sad thing is the only thing that makes us feel good are chemicals. :(
Kinesin killing it on the dance floor
This makes me so happy!
Some interesting comments here. I am interested to get an explanation of the scientific evidence (or a link to it) for the formation of the first "simple" cell. While studying some micro-biology I became perplexed how (considering the irreducible complexity of a "simple" cell containing Information wrapped up in the DNA that overlaps and in fact has information also stored in reverse over the same locus that contains coded start and stop delimiters to enable RNA process of copying information from the DNA to make the proteins that are transported by the Kinesin, along with the ability to reproduce itself)) was formed given only time and chance, yet alone the added information contained in the DNA "blueprint" to produce traits and other appendages feathers, muscles nerves and a control system with feedback to operate the wings and other appendages. Some keep pointing to natural selection and mutation but these processes explain screening of traits that already exist and not how they existed in the first place or gained information to result in more kinds of species. I want to see the evidence for how these cells could have come about in the first place.
We are inside a three dimensional picture tube connected to a computer that is making all the matter in the universe.
No you aren't interested, no one that is would use the creationist bs term like 'irreducible complexity' unless they're creationist already
even now you're assuming that cells started with the same mechanism they use now, completely incapable of ever grasping the idea that it would not be the case in reality and demonstrating your nonexistent grasp of evolution
maybe read about simple self-replicating molecules if you're really interested
Evolution only explain how life develops. For the origin you need another hypothesis like abiogenesis or panspermia
Evolution only explain how life develops. For the origin you need another hypothesis like abiogenesis or panspermia
Someone said: "You don't see/hear about a real scientist turning religious because of scientific research". Brian May (formerly the guitarist with Queen) became a professor of astrophysics. When asked about God he said he's not a Christian, but he felt that the "position" that God doesn't exist is hard to defend. I think that's an example of science "driving" faith.
My main question for the evolution group is this: Which developed first, the function or the information that defines the function? It would have to be information, would it not? To answer that, I personally have to come back to the whole ID thing. Not palatable for some, I know.
Can you elaborate on your question? What specifically are you talking about?
Issue here is that humanity is naturally inclined to want a god. Generically it happens again and again in every civilisation and its statements like this that prove this. Brian May while he studied some stuff, ( because that is what an academic award is ) has not stated any proof that God is actually something other than imagined by human beings. he just feels that the position or opinion that god doesn't exist is hard to defend. There is no reference in that referring to showing how he does exist. Show me dude.. go on... cough it up... but he can't or else he would have. Proof is so much stronger an argument than "its hard to defend"
I think you're misunderstanding what DNA is if you think it intrinsically holds information, you could make a case on a particle physics level there MAY be some intrinsic form of information in said particles. DNA is made up of molecules, molecules have tendencies of attaching and making reactions with other molecules based on properties of the atoms that compose it, these reactions are "read" and "replicated" for the "construction" of other proteins, because the "replicated code" attracts other said molecules to make proteins.
That does not mean it intrinsically holds information, information as scientists know it today is the mathematical data we retain digitally, or synaptically in our brains, or corresponding with writing in a book or paper, you'd have to assume that math is an unseen, unheard, intrinsic part of the universe, instead of a very useful tool for describing the universe with abstract terms.
Also, why does it have to be information first? you just assume that it does. like I said before, DNA does not intrinsically (it might, but asserting that it does doesn't help) contain info, we just ascribe it to that because we automatically assign information to anything that triggers our synapses when we look or think about it. If a rock on my table is used as a paperweight, did it intrinsically have the information to have the function of a paperweight? Or did we assign it that because the paperweights we design with an intended purpose in mind carry dense mass quantities? it sounds to me with asserted the rock has a function despite it clearly not being made for that. And what if said rock were to roll off (let's say it was an earthquake) the table and manages to wedge itself on my open door, who it suddenly stop being a paperweight and then a door-stop? both? it probably is just a rock in a particular situation that wouldn't even HAVE a function if we didn't assign it to it. This is how the new parts of evolution work too, random parts are either modified or changed in some way or added with a genetic mutation, but function comes first, since it's usually random. Irregardless of all of this, even if information came first for parts I don't jump to ID for this, I'd just go for god assisted evolution, which is far more reasonable and based less upon personal biases.
Also just saying one example of a guy who became a scientist does not an argument make, the position that god does, or does not, exists, as in a positive claim about a being who is supposedly unknowable, is a stupid thing to try and assert, asserting one does exist is stupid becuase little evidence supports that it in anyway interferes with our world, and saying one doesn't exist is just as stupid because we have no way of knowing whether or not he's just there but hiding or just made us and watches for interest. For me I have studied physics, biology, neurology, computer science, chemistry, psychology, genetics, probability, calculus etc and come to the conclusion that the God Concept has a very VERY low chance of actually having any truth behind it., that's my position, about 0.01% chance of it being true in my mind, so I might as well discard the idea as being factual in any way whatsoever.
Absolutely, Tom! Information is one insurmountable obstacle to any evolutionary scenario. Where did it all come from? How was it encoded into DNA and RNA? How did it find its way into the epigenome? Evolution cannot explain this. Blessings, JR
Tom Muckian I suggest you read Darwin's origin of species, you would gain a bit of insight about this subject, things that appear designed are actually a series of natural selections of random genetic mutations, out of randomness comes design with purpose, that is survive and perpetuate the information further, each time new genetic mutation, each time filtering what's not helpful and perpetuating what is.
That is not not proof of the existence or non-existence of divinity, myself am an agnostic, however, what this understanding does is explain how things that appear designed by a creator are not necessarily so. Again, I'm not denying the existence of a divinity, a creator or whatnot.
In cases were the data isn't there, I'm ready to admit that there is overconfidence, but when I dig deeper I find other scientists who approach the same problems with a healthy respect for data. The article on the exploration of protein fitness landscapes was informative. I'm learning to what extend these techniques are been applied to ribosomes. For instance, Ada Yonath is working on engineering a working proto-ribosome based on experiments in mutagenesis.
How does it know where to walk?
+Luke vl GOD KNOWS.
+Luke vl It's on a rail. (Microtubule)
That doesn't answer my question though does it?
does a train "know" where it is going?
yeah but how does it know to walk along the track? Not where its going.
Is this what it really looks like?!
It's highly accurate. A lot of it will be semi-transparent as it will be colorless, and the videos are slowed down A LOT.
Eh more or less. You can only get a certain level of clarity with a light microscope before it just looks like fuzzyness
this video is awesome. I used it with my class
I could watch this all day
When one understands the outrageous degree of complexity and interdependence of the cells components, the improbability of a mindless naturalistic mechanism seeking out and stumbling across them is easily apparent.These animations amaze people who have grown up in a culture that assumes we are accidental byproducts of nature, despite the fact that they are gross simplifications of actual cells. Future animations capturing the cells excruciating detail will be a final nail in the Darwinian coffin
OK, I have to say that if it moves exactly that way in real life, as it does in the animation... It really, really seems like it - and many other cell parts - are actually self-aware and have a purpose...
It does not. There is so much wiggling and thermal motion. I understand why this is not show though, it would make for a tough viewing.
You are a dofus
Thin Protein walking but he is always in frame
"Fear not to walk slowly. Be afraid only of standing still."
HATERS GONNA HATE
They see me rollin'
They hatin'
This should be the haters gonna hate gif fr though
These animations make me doubt my faith in Darwinism....
This is the cutest video I have ever seen...
Woah, thank you for this video.
When you walkin
LOL. This is nothing to do with religious books. While the scientific discovery of intelligent design might be friendly to some religions (like Theism) and unfriendly to others (like atheism), the scientific evidence speaks for itself, and the scientific evidence says "intelligent design"
NOT THE LIL PROTINE GOIN ON A LIL STROLE THAT'S SO CUTE
always thought these were SO COOL, and now im finally studying them😎 we made ittt till here😊
God is infinitely amazing.
*evolution
Stephanoceros fimbriatus lmfao state 1 scientific proof for that. You can't! It's a religion and it's definitely false.
Repent Your Sins i can't? Have you ever read a book of biology? It's full of proofs. But i actually can't see any proof of the existence of god. Have you ever met him?
Stephanoceros fimbriatus I met him 1 month ago... everyday since.
Stephanoceros fimbriatus Information cannot be created by chance, and this design required a massive amount of information. God is the only logical explanation. If you try to reproduce natural selection/mutation processes on a computer simulation, you realize that it never lead to complex machines like this one. It only produces worthless noise.
This is not random, this is design.
ATP is the energy currency of cells. Proteins were formulated within a similar way to adenine and ATP. Amino acids were formed by amines (such as ammonia) and carboxylic acid. Polymers of such amino acids are formed through what is known as a ''nucleophilic attack'' by the amino group of an amino acid at the electrophilic carbonyl carbon of the carboxyl group of another amino acid. Without catalysts, these polymers slowly formed globular molecules known as proteins.
it's so cute! LOOK there he goes!
سبحان الله ...
I thought the same thing. sb7an allah