After years of searching for a clear-cut contrast of these thinkers, I finally find something direct and clear. You are a gifted communicator sir. Well done.
Thank you for the brief introduction. I have a major in Literature so to have an overview of Social Contract and its history would have taken me one full day.
Thank you so much! My professor's video had been removed and have to write a paper based on this subject. You really helped me understand what I am supposed to be talking about!
Great video! My only criticism is that Hobbes didn’t necessarily favor monarchy by virtue of primogeniture, but rather by virtue of being absolutist in power.
We all wanted Locke’s visions. Rousseau’s and “will of the people” became to hard to define and practice. Right now, Hobbes, rules. This means humans suck.
Makaveli in this Killuminati, all through your body The blow's like a twelve gauge shotty Uhh, feel me! And God said he should send his one begotten son To lead the wild into the ways of the man Follow me; eat my flesh, flesh and my flesh Come with me, Hail Mary Run quick see, what do we have here Now, do you want to ride or die La dadada, la la la la I ain't a killer but don't push me Revenge is like the sweetest joy next to gettin' p**** Picture paragraphs unloaded, wise words bein' quoted Peeped the weakness int he rap game and sewed it Bow down, pray to God hoping that he's listenin' Seein' n****s comin' for me, to my diamonds, when they glistenin' Now pay attention, rest in peace father I'm a ghost in these killin' fields Hail Mary…
Locke is actually ambivalent, he does point out, maybe more alludes to (but hidden in the religious part) that actually woman should have an equal share(?) It's relatevised immidiatly in a or maybe not, but not a definete not, rather a polite since that seems the case in all cultures, while also having pointed out and pointing out that so is the case with monarchy
OK PLEASE SOMEONE HELP ME UNDERSTAND, how would Rousseau inspire Marxism , when to me it seems like he has an entirely libertarian view on government and man, asserting that when mankind is free to the highest extent they function the best, when Marxism is ultimate rlience upon the government???? Please let me know thanks!
Daniel Webb, thanks for your view and comment. Your point about Rousseau is well made. Marx never references him in his writings, but I make this claim for three reasons. 1. Rousseau eschews private property in his system; 2. He claims that political conflict arises from “conflict over things” and 3. People in his state of nature give up their freedom for the good of all, not protection of the individual. That’s why I make this claim. Thanks for viewing and for this dialogue.
@@kbarikmo: I think a case could be made that either Marx or his buddy Engels paraphrased Rousseau's starting sentence in 'The Social Contract', where he writes that "Man is born free and everywhere he is in chains." The end of the 'Communist Manifesto' ends with: "The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains." I don't think it is mere coincidence; Rousseau's formulation was as much a grab-you-by-the-collar way to begin an essay as Marx & Engels's formulation was to end an essay.
The state of nature is not a theory & It is equivalent to man in his natural habitat. The philosophy which comes closest to describing man in his habitat is that of Russo. Subsequent political theories that would recognize the reality of the natural state, and embrace the energy of it through that recognition are all political theories represented by various Constitutional authorities. It’s an ‘in the eye of god thing’.
Not completely, his idea of the sovereign being able to provide complete security is irrational. A sovereign cannot be all knowing about things like petty crime, and small- scale corruption. Apart from that I agree with his ideas.
The Disabled Person’s Social Contract This template is a guide for disabled and non-disabled people alike to better coexist.[i] This contract should be signed and notarized. 1. Give equal time (and number of words) to both speakers and do not interrupt or talk over the disabled person. 2. Speak at relatively the same pace, tone, and volume as the disabled person (not with loud shouting or an infantilizing lisp-lullaby) 3. Be open to having everything in your interaction with the disabled person being video and or audio recorded in order to protect the disabled person 4. Focusing the conversation upon facts and matters of substance rather than personal opinions and subjective value judgments about disability. [i] Due to the historical genocide and terrorism of society against the disabled it has become necessary to draft a contract to negotiate fair-minded and ethical rules for non-disabled people to interact with the disabled.
After years of searching for a clear-cut contrast of these thinkers, I finally find something direct and clear. You are a gifted communicator sir. Well done.
if i could give you a hug I would. thank you for such a detailed and CLEAR explanation with visuals. LOVE YOU
I have a test tomorrow. this helped a lot. thank you!
✌️✌️that's why am here too
Thank you for the brief introduction. I have a major in Literature so to have an overview of Social Contract and its history would have taken me one full day.
Thank you for this information, I couldn't grasp these concepts until I watched this video. Keep up the good work!
Thank you so much for this sir, your discussion can be easily understand and is direct to the point, this is definitely what I've been looking for.
Thank you so much! My professor's video had been removed and have to write a paper based on this subject. You really helped me understand what I am supposed to be talking about!
I'm in awe as to how good the automatic subtitles are.
Thank you so much! This helped me understand it clearly, especially their perspectives in relation with the social contract theory
I liked the comparison summary at 8:08 And at 8:49! Short and clear 🤔😉
Thank you so much! I couldn't grasp this information and after watching this video, I'm able to!
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THIS. YOU ARE AMAZING. KEEP DOING WHAT YOU DO.
You're saving my politics and economy exam, thanks
thnkq ,these videoes are awesome and really helps me in the prepration of my exam
Such an amazing video. Made professionally.!
Explain clearly. Thank you so much.
its interesting and also helpful......... Thank you very much
omg thank you so much for sumarissing all their views i have sociology exam next week thank you sir😊☺
+luqman turaki Political philosophy exam for me tomorrow! Hope your exam went well.
Thank you! The video was on point!
Great video! My only criticism is that Hobbes didn’t necessarily favor monarchy by virtue of primogeniture, but rather by virtue of being absolutist in power.
Great work loved it❤
thanks a lot, that is such a useful summary😇
Never realized the characters in Lost were a reflection of these philosophies
Hey guys. Can someone drop the sources of where he got this information. Would love to do the reading myself
You're great! Thank you!
wtf was that "be safe out there " about?
Hobbes may not have been exactly right but there are still things we can learn from him.
I have an Exam on Saturday to be specific “22nd May 2021” and is a law paper “Jurisprudence “
I am living in a monarchist country, and so far, yea, we are praised for our peaceful environment but hated for restrictions of freedom
I have an essay due and this helps
We all wanted Locke’s visions. Rousseau’s and “will of the people” became to hard to define and practice. Right now, Hobbes, rules. This means humans suck.
Great video.
thank you for this it really helped
very helpful. thank you so much!!
It helped me a lot😊😊😊
You sound just like Owen Wilson! 😱
thank you, this helped a lot!
What about machiavelli?
Machiavelli is not a social contract theorist
He's a precursor to social contract theory.
Makaveli in this Killuminati, all through your body
The blow's like a twelve gauge shotty
Uhh, feel me!
And God said he should send his one begotten son
To lead the wild into the ways of the man
Follow me; eat my flesh, flesh and my flesh
Come with me, Hail Mary
Run quick see, what do we have here
Now, do you want to ride or die
La dadada, la la la la
I ain't a killer but don't push me
Revenge is like the sweetest joy next to gettin' p****
Picture paragraphs unloaded, wise words bein' quoted
Peeped the weakness int he rap game and sewed it
Bow down, pray to God hoping that he's listenin'
Seein' n****s comin' for me, to my diamonds, when they glistenin'
Now pay attention, rest in peace father
I'm a ghost in these killin' fields
Hail Mary…
Ngga run quick see
What did Hobbes mean by 'awe'?
thank you buddy. This is a really nice video.
Locke is actually ambivalent, he does point out, maybe more alludes to (but hidden in the religious part) that actually woman should have an equal share(?) It's relatevised immidiatly in a or maybe not, but not a definete not, rather a polite since that seems the case in all cultures, while also having pointed out and pointing out that so is the case with monarchy
It's not actually resonable to say he means only men
I mean okay I know most people shut their brain of when it becomes religious and it's like one sentence, but STILL
You could just read it, it's for free or listen that's also possible for free
I feel that Thomas Hobbss way it's easy to live with, the people need peace more than power, otherwise..... fighting?
it helped a lot thank you
Very good content..👍🏻👍🏻
Thank you!
Love it
your thoughts on racism and the inherent "good" of man.
OK PLEASE SOMEONE HELP ME
UNDERSTAND, how would Rousseau inspire Marxism , when to me it seems like he has an entirely libertarian view on government and man, asserting that when mankind is free to the highest extent they function the best, when Marxism is ultimate rlience upon the government???? Please let me know thanks!
Daniel Webb, thanks for your view and comment. Your point about Rousseau is well made. Marx never references him in his writings, but I make this claim for three reasons. 1. Rousseau eschews private property in his system; 2. He claims that political conflict arises from “conflict over things” and 3. People in his state of nature give up their freedom for the good of all, not protection of the individual. That’s why I make this claim. Thanks for viewing and for this dialogue.
Just earned a new sub , thank you so much !
@@kbarikmo: I think a case could be made that either Marx or his buddy Engels paraphrased Rousseau's starting sentence in 'The Social Contract', where he writes that "Man is born free and everywhere he is in chains." The end of the 'Communist Manifesto' ends with: "The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains." I don't think it is mere coincidence; Rousseau's formulation was as much a grab-you-by-the-collar way to begin an essay as Marx & Engels's formulation was to end an essay.
The state of nature is not a theory & It is equivalent to man in his natural habitat. The philosophy which comes closest to describing man in his habitat is that of Russo. Subsequent political theories that would recognize the reality of the natural state, and embrace the energy of it through that recognition are all political theories represented by various Constitutional authorities. It’s an ‘in the eye of god thing’.
very helpful
great
Have you researched the mandela effect? What are your thoughts on it?
Why you make this video now we have work to do in our class 😡🤬🤬
lol lazy ass
Thxx sir 😊😊
of the three i choose rousseau
E
This guy sound like Owen Wilson
Rousseau is not behind the philosophy of our current Govt, the environmental movement nor the modern public education system...
very helpful. thanks
"Emanuel" Kant? :-D
Good guy Rousseau is good
I agree and disagree with John Locke same for Thomas Hobbes
Slurring. a bit dumbed down, but fine
123axel123 FYI it was for high school students.
@@kbarikmo Great that high school students get this. Sadly, university teaching i probably not more advanced.
it was funny ...last
Hobbes was right
Not completely, his idea of the sovereign being able to provide complete security is irrational. A sovereign cannot be all knowing about things like petty crime, and small- scale corruption. Apart from that I agree with his ideas.
The Disabled Person’s Social Contract
This template is a guide for disabled and non-disabled people alike to better coexist.[i] This contract should be signed and notarized.
1. Give equal time (and number of words) to both speakers and do not interrupt or talk over the disabled person.
2. Speak at relatively the same pace, tone, and volume as the disabled person (not with loud shouting or an infantilizing lisp-lullaby)
3. Be open to having everything in your interaction with the disabled person being video and or audio recorded in order to protect the disabled person
4. Focusing the conversation upon facts and matters of substance rather than personal opinions and subjective value judgments about disability.
[i] Due to the historical genocide and terrorism of society against the disabled it has become necessary to draft a contract to negotiate fair-minded and ethical rules for non-disabled people to interact with the disabled.
Thank you!