The script to this video is part of the Philosophy Vibe - "Political Philosophy" eBook, available on Amazon: mybook.to/philosophyvibe9 The Philosophy Vibe Paperback Anthology Vol 3 'Ethics & Political Philosophy' available worldwide on Amazon: mybook.to/philosophyvibevol3
I just got into the university and was searching for philosophy related videos, and I came across this one. It's so engaging and I love it. Thanks for making such relatable content
I like the fact how a topic is discussed so detailed yet easily digestable .. with a hint of critical aspects of the topic .. Epitome of education with fun animation
This was so incredibly helpful. I was having such a hard time finding sources that could actually break down and explain in layman's terms what both of these theories were and you guys did it so well. I needed to write a paper on this for my online humanities class and all the sources she gave us in the "online textbook" were so hard to understand and didn't explain anything. thank you so much for going so in depth! I've subscribed and will definitely come back and use you guys in the future!!!
Hi Philosophy Vibe! I stumbled across your channel as I was searching for simple explanations. You guys nailed it! Now, I don't have to read such a long reading material.
Im about to defend my Thesis with regards to Hobbes' Social Contract Theory, one major questions i might encounter is why i chose Hobbes' over Locke. I am fortunate to find this video.
Thank you so much... I have an exam which included information pertaining the social contrat theory. And with this simple details, i am surely good to go. Thank you once again ❤
Hello Philosophy Vibe, thank you for this insight and making understanding of these concepts easier. However, it would be of much gratitude to receive your analytics on the racial contract theory on your channel as well.
Excellent reasoning,,proving freedom of speech,thought is more than beneficial,,, but out right necessary ,for best achievements and full SELF REALIZATION of individuals AND COMMUNITY....Ect Ect Ect Ect Ect Ect ..Great VIDEO ..
THANK YOU SO MUCHHH. Apart from making me relief from the burden of my assignment and reading textbooks itself, this video also made me interested in the topic and got me curious! Again, thank you thank you thank you so much...
By the way i got the assignment from the university to watch the social contract between Hobbes&Locke and to be honest i really like this video it very well-put and understandable.
Finally someone who actually calls out Hobbes on his delusional theory of social contract. Everyone that talks about this does it as if this man is a genius, when he's simply a fool and having seen the war made him a coward!
Thank you for the video! I would contra-argue that just the fact property is not self-evident as natural law doesn't mean it is not. Gravity is also not self-evident but still a natural law. And about the last argument of 'go to live in a forest', I understood the argument, but the main point of this argument is about legitimate power to use the force against you and make you agree with such a contract. I love your videos! You people are awesome!
Life is the first property you have. Slavery is just a tax of the 100% over your work and the lack of own property, dependant on the control of a master who could perfectly be analogous the own State.
that was really good..I have a reuest sir...kindly make another video and include Jean. J Rousseau,s social contract theory comparison with Hobbes and Locke...compare and contrast the theories of these three persons in a single scroll...i will be deeply grateful..
Glad you enjoyed the video. We have done a sole video on Rousseau's social contract so this might be worth a watch :) th-cam.com/video/hssYkF-s3ks/w-d-xo.html
Locke's theories don't really seem to be much of a contract at all, considering that the contract can be broken whenever the government is unjust (which is good, I just don't think his theory strongly fits in with the idea of a "social contract").
I have been watching your videos for years. I think both of you are the same person. The left is the side of your free spirit soul and the right is your calm soul. Am I correct?
"What is government and how it came to be?" It's known as the constitution. It is what is known as duties and limitations of the "government." Since FDR we've had neither. UNITED STATES has been a corporation since in chapter 11 bankruptcy.
First Hobbs contradicts his philosophy as he states individuals are selfish and corrupt. So in that very breath he states give these “individuals” full power and authority? Interesting.
According to Locke the state of nature was bounded by laws derived from rational thoughts since humans are rational beings... I may think that in the earlier state before human development there was no sense or too many cases of brutality and wrong doing. Then why the need for a social contract to have our properties secured if safety was assured in the state of nature?
i’m SOOOO late but part of locke’s state of nature is that every man has equal right to enforce the laws of nature on every other man, which includes punishment for violating those laws (ie infringing on life, liberty, and property). locke argued that a situation where each individual enforces their own justice leaves open the potential for “justice” to become biased and self interested and more about revenge than anything else. so while the state of nature is not a violent bloody war like hobbes’ is, it’s by no means safe. people’s life liberty and property rights are constantly threatened by others, and because of our bias/self interest we’re also not very good at enforcing justice on each other when those rights are violated. so it’s better and safer to authorize a government to enforce those protections for us
I disagree with these philosophers reviews on how social contract theory. Most of the liberal society as far as social contracts are concerned are based around the UN, and The fact that liberal values on morality are superior to conservative values on morality and that we’re bound by birth to those liberal and progressive values rather we like it or not. UN position is that these of liberal progressive morals including international democracy or a form of human rights which is why we agree to them by existing. Saying that you disagree with International human rights law is by it’s definition a hypocritical and contradictory statement as you agreed to international human rights law by existing. The thing is a posing liberal progressive society is where the problem, because even conservatives agreed to the society by existing.
So why do we have parlaments? Is it not to limit the power the government? What about elections? They throw the current government for a new depending on what people believe they want.
John Locke's social contract revels morality. The theory says that people live together in society in accordance with an agreement that establishes moral and political rules of behaviour.
It's other way around, liberty, life and property is called natural right by liberal and they have to produce evidence to such claim not those who denies it.
Absolutely not. In fact, Thomas Hobbes was the first to analyse political systems using the individual and not the community as the main subject of political construction, that is why he is one of the fathers of liberalism. Communism, on the other hand, can be related with another contractualist: Rousseau. His idea of "general will" was certainly an inspiration for Marx. But comparing communism with Hobbes is nonsense.
@@pimpampum9968 i completely agree with you, Rousseau believed that people should rule themselves, he believed that the legislature (the person that represents the people) should always place their general interest before their individual interest and that's true communism on the other hand Hobbes believed that people can't live together because they're selfish by nature, the only way to coexistence is by sacrificing something and that is their freedom.
![[TH] 2024 PMSL SEA W1D5 | Fall | เก็บแต้มของจริง คือวันนี้](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EciIAlCXg5k/mqdefault.jpg)
The script to this video is part of the Philosophy Vibe - "Political Philosophy" eBook, available on Amazon:
mybook.to/philosophyvibe9
The Philosophy Vibe Paperback Anthology Vol 3 'Ethics & Political Philosophy' available worldwide on Amazon:
mybook.to/philosophyvibevol3
I just got into the university and was searching for philosophy related videos, and I came across this one. It's so engaging and I love it. Thanks for making such relatable content
You're welcome, glad we can help you in your philosophy studies. Best of luck in the uni course.
A very simple and easy video to understand the two theories. I commend this channel for making learning philosophy easier. Thank you for the video.
You're very welcome, thanks for watching :)
I like the fact how a topic is discussed so detailed yet easily digestable .. with a hint of critical aspects of the topic ..
Epitome of education with fun animation
haha this is like me talking to my friends about politics when half of them are baked out of their minds
This is all I could think about honestly.
This was so incredibly helpful. I was having such a hard time finding sources that could actually break down and explain in layman's terms what both of these theories were and you guys did it so well. I needed to write a paper on this for my online humanities class and all the sources she gave us in the "online textbook" were so hard to understand and didn't explain anything. thank you so much for going so in depth! I've subscribed and will definitely come back and use you guys in the future!!!
So glad we could help! Best of luck in the paper.
Hi Philosophy Vibe! I stumbled across your channel as I was searching for simple explanations. You guys nailed it! Now, I don't have to read such a long reading material.
Thank you very much and we hope you continue to enjoy our content.
Im about to defend my Thesis with regards to Hobbes' Social Contract Theory, one major questions i might encounter is why i chose Hobbes' over Locke. I am fortunate to find this video.
Glad we could help, good luck in the thesis.
@@PhilosophyVibe I successfully defended my thesis. Watching your vids are worth it.
@@bryanfatalla329 Is it possible to see your thesis? Currently doing a research now and would be helpful to have more references.
Thank you so much for this.
You're very welcome :)
Thank you so much...
I have an exam which included information pertaining the social contrat theory. And with this simple details, i am surely good to go. Thank you once again ❤
Hello Philosophy Vibe, thank you for this insight and making understanding of these concepts easier. However, it would be of much gratitude to receive your analytics on the racial contract theory on your channel as well.
Thanks for the suggestion, we will look into this.
@@PhilosophyVibe Thank you!
Anyone else here from Jordan Peterson describing how he's a combination of both of these great men? 👍 Love that guy.
Excellent reasoning,,proving freedom of speech,thought is more than beneficial,,, but out right necessary ,for best achievements and full SELF REALIZATION of individuals AND COMMUNITY....Ect Ect Ect Ect Ect Ect ..Great VIDEO ..
THANK YOU SO MUCHHH. Apart from making me relief from the burden of my assignment and reading textbooks itself, this video also made me interested in the topic and got me curious! Again, thank you thank you thank you so much...
You're welcome, glad we could help. Best of luck in the assignment.
Just found you guys and I'm so thankful! You guys are great!
Thank you so much, happy you found us :)
This is so cool, i'll say it's the best platform to gain more knowledge about political philosophy.
By the way i got the assignment from the university to watch the social contract between Hobbes&Locke and to be honest i really like this video it very well-put and understandable.
Finally someone who actually calls out Hobbes on his delusional theory of social contract. Everyone that talks about this does it as if this man is a genius, when he's simply a fool and having seen the war made him a coward!
Great video! I hope you guys do more.
Thank you, and still loads more to come :)
Thank you for the video!
I would contra-argue that just the fact property is not self-evident as natural law doesn't mean it is not. Gravity is also not self-evident but still a natural law.
And about the last argument of 'go to live in a forest', I understood the argument, but the main point of this argument is about legitimate power to use the force against you and make you agree with such a contract.
I love your videos!
You people are awesome!
Thank you very much, and excellent points you have raised!
Life is the first property you have. Slavery is just a tax of the 100% over your work and the lack of own property, dependant on the control of a master who could perfectly be analogous the own State.
Very helpful discussion. I had an essay to write for World History and this video helped my understanding better than my over 700 page book😂
Glad we could help :D
really great video! I especially like the part you two insert potential disagreement and discussion
Thank you, glad you enjoyed.
Thank you! so much, this was a lifesaver for my upcoming test
You're welcome, best of luck in the test.
Oh....this video helped me so much for my test!
Glad we could help :)
Great video. In regard to Locke’s idea of overthrowing the government should they become too corrupt, you could expand on that through Thomas Paine
Thank you, and great suggestion for another video!
Philosophy Vibe not a problem. Thanks for uploading interesting content
That's no idea and can be found readily in the last sentence of the first paragraph of the bill of rights.
I truly love your videos!!
Thank you :D
nice video, easy to remember and understand
Thank you, glad you liked it :)
Great work! Thanks much.
You're welcome :D
that was really good..I have a reuest sir...kindly make another video and include Jean. J Rousseau,s social contract theory comparison with Hobbes and Locke...compare and contrast the theories of these three persons in a single scroll...i will be deeply grateful..
Glad you enjoyed the video. We have done a sole video on Rousseau's social contract so this might be worth a watch :)
th-cam.com/video/hssYkF-s3ks/w-d-xo.html
Thank you so much for this
Locke's theories don't really seem to be much of a contract at all, considering that the contract can be broken whenever the government is unjust (which is good, I just don't think his theory strongly fits in with the idea of a "social contract").
Unjust to whom is the big question.
I have been watching your videos for years.
I think both of you are the same person. The left is the side of your free spirit soul and the right is your calm soul.
Am I correct?
Now that you say that I am kind of considering the same question
Seems like the idea of private rights and public Commerce rights are still being intertwined without being divided correctly
This videos has been very helpful.
The best idea from Hobbes was to get relegion out of politics
The only good idea, I would say 😅
Yeah look how that went, drag queens teaching our kids and soulless corporate society
A profound statement about religion from a person who does not know how to spell religion. Given your spelling I'm going to assume Biden voter🤔😋?
Getting religion out of politics also seperated politics from religion. A win-win in many cases.
loved it. was easy to understand. Thank you
You're welcome :)
this helped me with my AP Gov homework, thank you so much!!!
You're welcome, glad we could help.
@@PhilosophyVibe hey can you help for home work
@@PhilosophyVibe plz
This is great to help teach children
Thanks very much 🙏
Locke's and Hobbes theories are well understandable 👍
Can i have karl Marx own please
Thank you for the explanation; I really understand
Glad it was helpful!
❤️❤️thanks alot
Very well done!
Thank you :)
Thank for your exsplanation..
So make me understand abaout.this teorie...i like it's because really help me for studying..👍👍👍
Great, glad we could help.
This great vidio so make me easy for undertanding about this teorie....so thank you so much....👍👍
That was a great video thank you
You're welcome, glad you enjoyed.
"What is government and how it came to be?" It's known as the constitution. It is what is known as duties and limitations of the "government." Since FDR we've had neither. UNITED STATES has been a corporation since in chapter 11 bankruptcy.
Thank you!
First Hobbs contradicts his philosophy as he states individuals are selfish and corrupt. So in that very breath he states give these “individuals” full power and authority? Interesting.
Bruh the rainforest ( ToT ) guess I got my backup point for my next debate
Can you please make a video on Mancur Olson and his views, and how they differ from Hobbes ideas of democracy/government? Thank you!
Thank you for the recommendation, we will look into it.
Interesting the point being made about having absolute freedom vs being protected by police and government.
Very great! I wish you can make John Rawl's Justice as fairness also in connection with Locke's Liberalism
Thank you! And we are planning a video on Rawl's.
@@PhilosophyVibe that would be great!
Very interesting .
Does he ever address that the state usually has the Monopoly on violent power?
This is like the ideal gas law for politics. Great for teaching elementary concepts, but not very accurate to use often in real life applications.
This is helpful ❤
Some of the "problems of the social contracts" could be answered if you also discussed about contractarianism.
Thanks so much...
You're welcome :)
great video
Thanks!
Excellent
Thank you.
Thank you
You're welcome.
According to Locke the state of nature was bounded by laws derived from rational thoughts since humans are rational beings... I may think that in the earlier state before human development there was no sense or too many cases of brutality and wrong doing. Then why the need for a social contract to have our properties secured if safety was assured in the state of nature?
i’m SOOOO late but part of locke’s state of nature is that every man has equal right to enforce the laws of nature on every other man, which includes punishment for violating those laws (ie infringing on life, liberty, and property). locke argued that a situation where each individual enforces their own justice leaves open the potential for “justice” to become biased and self interested and more about revenge than anything else. so while the state of nature is not a violent bloody war like hobbes’ is, it’s by no means safe. people’s life liberty and property rights are constantly threatened by others, and because of our bias/self interest we’re also not very good at enforcing justice on each other when those rights are violated. so it’s better and safer to authorize a government to enforce those protections for us
I disagree with these philosophers reviews on how social contract theory. Most of the liberal society as far as social contracts are concerned are based around the UN, and The fact that liberal values on morality are superior to conservative values on morality and that we’re bound by birth to those liberal and progressive values rather we like it or not. UN position is that these of liberal progressive morals including international democracy or a form of human rights which is why we agree to them by existing. Saying that you disagree with International human rights law is by it’s definition a hypocritical and contradictory statement as you agreed to international human rights law by existing.
The thing is a posing liberal progressive society is where the problem, because even conservatives agreed to the society by existing.
So why do we have parlaments? Is it not to limit the power the government? What about elections? They throw the current government for a new depending on what people believe they want.
Good stuff guys
Thank you.
tell the guy in the purple that smoking is VERY bad for you. Great video btw
Thank you. And he has been warned :)
Agreed. So what happened in the US. Religion is everywhere. Even on the money.
Subscribed.
Welcome :)
Jesus is sovereign and hes coming back.
I'd bet he doesn't.
Nah
Side eye
you guys in the replies are poopies. I say amen
@@bourbon2242 poopies😅😅 How old are you?😂
“If you don’t like the state, then you can just leave”
Isn't hobbes a-historical? he could have drawn his observations from English history
going back to Magna Carta for relations of individual v state.
Lol where was this video when I was in uni? I would've aced my POLS 301 module
how fulfilling.
This video literally saved me on my midterm
Glad we could help :)
W chamnel
The new rulers slay 🌟 😅
is locke's social contract historical or moral? the same with hobbes? why?
John Locke's social contract revels morality. The theory says that people live together in society in accordance with an agreement that establishes moral and political rules of behaviour.
The other guy’s voice 😂😂😂😂
Bruh
Good information but the voice-over/speed of talking not so much ...
Great Video! But second guy should stop smoking.
His whisky drinking is also out of control 😂 thanks for watching.
Sounds like sleepy Joe is not doing his part
I was just wondering in what sense it is not self evident that life, liberty and property are natural rights?
It's other way around, liberty, life and property is called natural right by liberal and they have to produce evidence to such claim not those who denies it.
🙂
Thomas Hobbes is a bit similar to communism political state... I subscribed to lockes viewpoint sovereignty by rational rights.
Absolutely not. In fact, Thomas Hobbes was the first to analyse political systems using the individual and not the community as the main subject of political construction, that is why he is one of the fathers of liberalism.
Communism, on the other hand, can be related with another contractualist: Rousseau. His idea of "general will" was certainly an inspiration for Marx. But comparing communism with Hobbes is nonsense.
@@pimpampum9968 what you are referring to is John Lockes
@@jamesnorseman4863 No. All I said is correct.
@@pimpampum9968 i completely agree with you, Rousseau believed that people should rule themselves, he believed that the legislature (the person that represents the people) should always place their general interest before their individual interest and that's true communism on the other hand Hobbes believed that people can't live together because they're selfish by nature, the only way to coexistence is by sacrificing something and that is their freedom.
Great
Thanks
Guy on the left needs to clear his throat or something
First three minutes pretty much rules me out of being rational
video was great why the left sound like he almost dying from lack of oxygen
Orange lives matter 😂
Great... wow is getting more woke..