Hands on with the difference between loft, fill and a boundary surface

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 4

  • @vvviiimmm
    @vvviiimmm 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    super useful, thanks for sharing

    • @gregbrown-onshape7555
      @gregbrown-onshape7555  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No problem - if you have any questions be sure to drop me a line

  • @nickholzem7401
    @nickholzem7401 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi Greg, thanks for breaking this down for us! Oftentimes projected curves are necessary to control the direction of a curve in 2 directions to achieve desired shapes. Is there potential to enhance the bridging curve with a 2 directional projected mode to leverage the simplicity of a briding curve while achieving shapes only created by traditional methods of projected curves while keeping spans and control points to a minimum? Essentially the user would define 2 projected directions and have 2 sets of magnitudes related to each of the directions. It would return the product of 2 bridging curves as one, all done in a single feature. Would the product still be no better than using a traditional method to create a more complex projected curve? Or what other methods do you suggest to achieve higher quality projected curves? Better sketch entities than spline or other methods to create a curve which requires directional change woth reference to 2 directions?

    • @gregbrown-onshape7555
      @gregbrown-onshape7555  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I've been playing with some custom feature experiments to tweak clean curves without resorting to projection. It's a bit of a pet project of mine that's been running for a year or so... One working title I have a "Wildcard" custom feature where I inject a new control point into a bSpline/Bezier etc (which may have previously been created by a bridging curve, or any curve/sketch) and give it a manipulator to tweak the new curve. It's a bit early yet to show, so let me think on your comment a bit more.