The Stolen Turnabout from T&T is a grand larceny trial and from what I remember was pretty good. I wish they did more like that. Spoilers below for those who haven't reach that case yet: Granted in becomes a murder mystery in the end but hey, you get what you can
@@SegaMario The Attorney's Badge is always listed as an option for which piece of evidence that you can select. It never proves anything besides the fact that you are licensed to practice law, which you have been doing the whole time.
You are probably onto something. The animation studio might just be a front to something more sinister. ...then again, it may also be that it's just a defunct factory building that was cheaper for the studio to buy/rent than a proper office building.
@@absolutezerochill2700 Nah, if it wasn't obvious by existence of villages of japanese mediums, ninjas, literal Yakuza and police uniforms, it's intended to be Japan. The setting changes based on language you play on.
I love how, instead of saying "Well, the date could've been faked", he just starts admitting his Dad stole. If he'd kept his composure, there would still be plausible deniability.
To be fair, that argument would have been seen as desperate at that point by the judge, so it would have only stalled things at best. He couldn't prove anymore his dad didn't steal Lampwick's work, so he just caved and tried to gain sympathy from the audience by arguing, "What choice do we have? It's the only way we can make good stuff." Sure, it made him look worse for spouting that rhetoric, but he was screwed either way. He was not weaseling his way out of this and he knew it.
@@VGamingJunkieVT While I agree reasonable doubt could have possibly still worked for Meyers Jr, it would have been very short lived at best. Let's say he did argue the point, "The date could have been faked." Well, then all they would have to do to clear that up is bring in some experts to closely examine the signature and paper it was on to see if it was indeed from that time period and after they verified it was, it would have been case over. Like I said in my last comment, Meyers Jr knew he couldn't weasel his way out of this. He was screwed no matter what he did from that point on, so he tried pleading his case to the audience because he knew the judge pretty much had made up his mind about the case after seeing that artwork.
Technically, if they ~did~ have a copy, by law, they must give it to the defense. Edit: Actually, any information must be shared between the plaintiff and the defense. If any side has exonerating evidence, by law it must be shared.
Y'know, I'd say 'It should've come up in discovery,' but I think we all know from Phoenix Wright, that universe has NO concept of discovery. Or due process!
Let me also add that Nixon (not that you'll read about this on any news outlet) was recently exonerated of all wrong-doing in the Watergate Scandal because the lawyers working on the prosecution recently all died. All of their notes were seized and all sorts of exculpatory evidence was there that proved Nixon had zero hand in what happened. The truth finally comes out. Too little, too late, but it's out.
@@sarcasticguy4311 What you're claiming is so absurd and unrelated to the post I nearly sh*t my pants laughing. For the record, Shephard's book mostly casts doubt on Dean and Sirica due to their misrepresentation of the strength of the evidence and Sirica's lack of impartiality. It casts doubt on Nixon's involvement with hush payments, but that's about it. Only the people who think that Nixon was impeached for literally and directly ordered the Watergate break-in would consider him to be exonerated by Shephard.
Given how bad most people in Springfield are at their jobs, I don't think Lionel Hutz is that incompetent a lawyer at all. He's actually won a few cases, although it's usually because of someone else, and when he _loses_ a case, again it's often because of someone else.
@@jamesgravil9162 We're not measuring his skill by Springfield standards. We're judging him by professionalism and effectiveness as a lawyer in general. Besides man, it was supposed to be a joke. 252 people thought it was funny.
Phoenix wright: really?, Do you apologize me?, After all I did?. Well, it shouldn't be me, you should be apologizing Miles Edgeworth for that!!. "Miles Edgeworth: "gah", wright!!, I told you not to mention my involvement!. Franziska: i'll take note of that declaration, Miles Edgeworth will be published really severe
@@lautarogomez9711 1. Work on your grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. 2. I don't recall Franziska ever questioning Edgeworth's competence as a lawyer. In fact, as I recall, she did the exact opposite. 3. What's supposed to be the punchline here?
Should've challenged the pictures authenticity. The only thing dating it is a handwritten note at the corner which could've been written at a later time.
@@5xg378 they will have to test the ink on the note to prove that Chester made itchy. Not sure how accurate to test were back when this episode was made. They would've argue that the test is unreliable which is a flimsy argument but it's all they got.
@@benjamincuevas9627 Not just the ink, they will compare the handwriting to see if it matches... iirc they even check the pressure applied to the paper when writing because that too tends to be a constant in an individual.... but as of age of the ink i have no idea how the test of age is done nor how reliable it is.
Ok straight up "that supposed evidence you destroyed bit" is straight out of an ace attorney game and that "animation is built of plagiarism" sounds like actual breakdown dialogue
@@tristanband4003 No, I KNOW it's not. Bet you don't even know what copyright does. It's invaluable for writers, artists, musicians, etc. You probably just think of UMG when you hear the word "copyright".
The sheer amount of effort that must've went into this is insane. I really hope this gets picked up by the algorithm one day because this deserves 10x the amount of views it has.
@@daviddechamplain5718Technically, they are hearsay exceptions. So hearsay are not allowed, except if... And some of these exceptions have exceptions. So "except if, but not if..." As for conjecture, they can be difficult to draw a line because while conjectures are not allowed, inferences are allowed. So what's funny is how good of a representation of a bad lawyer is Lionel Hutz just to say that instead of trying to frame it as something more acceptable. The Simpsons did a great job at portraying a very bad lawyer.
Literally, you could play the ace attorney music over any court hearing, real or fake, and I would pay attention to what everyone is saying. Otherwise, I get bored.
This was one of my favorite Blue Haired Lawyer scenes of the show. Loved how sarcastic he was and the way he said "Dinner Dog." Great editing by the way
I like how they do a little callback to "Itchy & Scratchy & Marge" where Marge's ideas for making the show more kid-friendly ended up tanking the show.
Phil Hartman and Alex Rocco in the same episode was a blessing on its own, but now i can show this to some Capcom fans i know for a good laugh. nice work!
@@graycrest806 Its not even the having of the money and being well off. It's having it in literal cash at that moment in time. That's the kind of well off of criminals. Most well off people carry barely any cash on them.
Man. I've had my whole life to say: The animation and writing was so much better and mature back then. Just look at that check at 4:31! And now that I'm older and watch lawtube, i appreciate this scene/episode EVEN MORE!
most people do know that lee was more the publisher/editor/face behind marvel. hell, even DC was guilty of the same practices and even killed companies with those practices. but that was kinda how the industry was back then. some people were aware of this like ditko while others like moore weren't.
As do I buddy as do I I hate the fact that Stan Lee is praised while Steve Ditko and Jack Kirby are confined to obscurity Not to mention that if it wasn't for Jack Kirby trying to fight against Marvel for failure to comply with copyright law in the 1970s and 1980s we would not have the current copyright law which guarantees the protections of the individual creators that we have now
@@xsoultillerx no I disagree because when Jack Kirby took Marvel and by extension Stan Lee to court he ripped apart the Marvel ownership and got at least about 1300 pages of his artwork back granted it was not the best outcome as over the decades there were about 30,000 pages that Jack Kirby drew for Marvel But it was enough to prove that Marvel was on the wrong side of copyright law and they have never forgotten it
@@rejvaik00 The biggest tragedy was that Kirby fought for comic artist rights and better treatment, but could never take advantage of them. The industry got better but Kirby never got to experience it.
The only thing it could be improved would have been using the "Logic and Trick" during the first exposition by the procurat... blue haired lawyer. For the rest... perfection!!!
I had to look up blintzes and my mouth watered. They're like crepes but usually folded around a sweet cheese and pan-fried with maybe some jam on top. Scrumptious looking.
The early part of the second case in Justice For All *does* indicate that the Ace Attorney lawyers occasionally take civil cases, we just never get to do them. Must be during the not insignificant gaps in time between games.
I've only just realised the Itchy and Scratchy studios have smoke stacks like a factory, implying the production of Itchy and Scratchy is some sort of industrial process.
Hutz's array of witnesses looks exactly like the shit you'd get in Ace Attorney too.
Literally Ben and Trilo in the front
@@maqdarigus5866 followed by larry dressed as santa
@@maqdarigus5866 probably as annoying as them as well lol
@LEPrecon Like #1,500.
The third guy was John Schwartzweilder the writer of the episode.
This is proof that not every trial in Ace Attorney has to be a murder mystery, this scene would fit perfectly fine in the series
I think Capcom think a non-murder case won't be interesting.
The Stolen Turnabout from T&T is a grand larceny trial and from what I remember was pretty good. I wish they did more like that.
Spoilers below for those who haven't reach that case yet:
Granted in becomes a murder mystery in the end but hey, you get what you can
Technically multiple Great Ace Attorney cases aren't murders.
What is murder but theft of life?
@@WiFi-qj5kr wut
"We have plenty of hearsay and conjecture, those are KINDS of evidence."
I use this line all the time.
not to mention acceptable evidence in Ace Attorney courts
I remember a lawyer revising this episode and he said hearsay and conjecture are indeed kinds of evidence though terrible ones.
@@edersonnico That is, in fact, the joke.
That's 100000000% Phoenix Wright.
- Edgeworth
Of course they are, I mean look at Amber Heard
Its interesting how the show's actual music gels well with the Ace Attorney theme in the ending.
@mohamed zayan It was, but you can still hear the original Simpsons music and jingles behind it.
@@napoleoncomplex2712 You should hear it with Better Call Saul.
This ending could've been avoided if Hutz used his badge as evidence
"this badge proves...
*" T h a t I ' m a l a w y e r ! "*
@@whispypuffs4670 MR MEYERS NO
How would that work.
How would it even *POSSIBLY* work.
@@SegaMario
The Attorney's Badge is always listed as an option for which piece of evidence that you can select. It never proves anything besides the fact that you are licensed to practice law, which you have been doing the whole time.
@@whispypuffs4670 the badge's fingerprints were burned off at the chemical factory
Funny how an animation studio needs smoke stacks.
Talk about irony.
You should see the sympathy card mines.
Very few cartoons are created without the added energy of fossil fuels, it's a terrible strain on the animators wrist.
And a water tower
You are probably onto something.
The animation studio might just be a front to something more sinister.
...then again, it may also be that it's just a defunct factory building that was cheaper for the studio to buy/rent than a proper office building.
Love the " liver and onions(hamburgers in the JP version)"
Why is it hamburgers in the JP version
It's a joke about how the western versions of Ace Attorney localized setting from Japan to California.
@@Darkcerve I thought it was always in California? Besides, hamburgers would make more sense there anyways.
@@absolutezerochill2700 Nah, if it wasn't obvious by existence of villages of japanese mediums, ninjas, literal Yakuza and police uniforms, it's intended to be Japan. The setting changes based on language you play on.
@@Darkcerve ah, okay. I thought it was because of the time zone evidence in the first turnabout
The 'miracle' never happen.
"I never saw Itchy again..."
That's unpossible
2:24 Phoenix Wright's tactics in a nutshell.
I love how Homer was totally cool with just forking over 750 dollars to Bart
I love how, instead of saying "Well, the date could've been faked", he just starts admitting his Dad stole. If he'd kept his composure, there would still be plausible deniability.
That's cause liars will always fall through somehow... At least the ones who are caught...
To be fair, that argument would have been seen as desperate at that point by the judge, so it would have only stalled things at best. He couldn't prove anymore his dad didn't steal Lampwick's work, so he just caved and tried to gain sympathy from the audience by arguing, "What choice do we have? It's the only way we can make good stuff."
Sure, it made him look worse for spouting that rhetoric, but he was screwed either way. He was not weaseling his way out of this and he knew it.
@@Jonathan83X
He wouldn’t have to prove it wasn’t stolen, our justice system is innocent until proven guilty. Reasonable doubt works for the accused.
@@VGamingJunkieVT While I agree reasonable doubt could have possibly still worked for Meyers Jr, it would have been very short lived at best. Let's say he did argue the point, "The date could have been faked." Well, then all they would have to do to clear that up is bring in some experts to closely examine the signature and paper it was on to see if it was indeed from that time period and after they verified it was, it would have been case over.
Like I said in my last comment, Meyers Jr knew he couldn't weasel his way out of this. He was screwed no matter what he did from that point on, so he tried pleading his case to the audience because he knew the judge pretty much had made up his mind about the case after seeing that artwork.
@@Jonathan83X
To be fair, that seems like more competency than Lionel Hutz has shown capable of. It's reasonable to think it might've just worked.
"Well I don't think I am under oath, but, yes my father created them all."
*5 Psyche Locks appear*
Wayyyy better than most edits where they just put the music in the background, and so loud you cant hear shit! Good job!
"The film you destroyed before the trial?"
"You don't have a copy, do you?"
That line gets me everytime.
Technically, if they ~did~ have a copy, by law, they must give it to the defense.
Edit: Actually, any information must be shared between the plaintiff and the defense. If any side has exonerating evidence, by law it must be shared.
Had Edgeworth prosecuted, he would have made sure to get a copy.
Y'know, I'd say 'It should've come up in discovery,' but I think we all know from Phoenix Wright, that universe has NO concept of discovery. Or due process!
Let me also add that Nixon (not that you'll read about this on any news outlet) was recently exonerated of all wrong-doing in the Watergate Scandal because the lawyers working on the prosecution recently all died. All of their notes were seized and all sorts of exculpatory evidence was there that proved Nixon had zero hand in what happened. The truth finally comes out. Too little, too late, but it's out.
@@sarcasticguy4311 What you're claiming is so absurd and unrelated to the post I nearly sh*t my pants laughing. For the record, Shephard's book mostly casts doubt on Dean and Sirica due to their misrepresentation of the strength of the evidence and Sirica's lack of impartiality. It casts doubt on Nixon's involvement with hush payments, but that's about it. Only the people who think that Nixon was impeached for literally and directly ordered the Watergate break-in would consider him to be exonerated by Shephard.
*Franziska von Karma:* [After watching entire video] Phoenix Wright, I was wrong. You are NOT the most incompetent attorney in existence. I apologize.
Given how bad most people in Springfield are at their jobs, I don't think Lionel Hutz is that incompetent a lawyer at all. He's actually won a few cases, although it's usually because of someone else, and when he _loses_ a case, again it's often because of someone else.
@@jamesgravil9162 We're not measuring his skill by Springfield standards. We're judging him by professionalism and effectiveness as a lawyer in general. Besides man, it was supposed to be a joke. 252 people thought it was funny.
281 now.
Phoenix wright: really?, Do you apologize me?, After all I did?. Well, it shouldn't be me, you should be apologizing Miles Edgeworth for that!!.
"Miles Edgeworth: "gah", wright!!, I told you not to mention my involvement!.
Franziska: i'll take note of that declaration, Miles Edgeworth will be published really severe
@@lautarogomez9711 1. Work on your grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.
2. I don't recall Franziska ever questioning Edgeworth's competence as a lawyer. In fact, as I recall, she did the exact opposite.
3. What's supposed to be the punchline here?
3:59 I love how Wiggum looks at him.
3:50 When Bluedud held his head down he's screaming inside "YOU ADMITTED IT, YOU STUPID GOOF!"
Objection! He's merely recognizing that a theft _could_ have happened.
Should've challenged the pictures authenticity. The only thing dating it is a handwritten note at the corner which could've been written at a later time.
@@benjamincuevas9627 It could be tested tho
@@5xg378 they will have to test the ink on the note to prove that Chester made itchy. Not sure how accurate to test were back when this episode was made. They would've argue that the test is unreliable which is a flimsy argument but it's all they got.
@@benjamincuevas9627 Not just the ink, they will compare the handwriting to see if it matches... iirc they even check the pressure applied to the paper when writing because that too tends to be a constant in an individual.... but as of age of the ink i have no idea how the test of age is done nor how reliable it is.
I'd love a Lionel Hutz AA-style game where you have to make up all your evidence totally out of your ass on the spot
Isn't that how Phoenix Wright won his case?
@@colindowden2182 which
So, just Phoenix Wright
2:20 When you finish 5 minutes of the trial
...After waiting in the hallway for 3 hours and 55 minutes for the damn trial to even start!
1:27
POV: You're an actual real life lawyer trying to play an Ace Attorney Game for the first time
Ok straight up "that supposed evidence you destroyed bit" is straight out of an ace attorney game and that "animation is built of plagiarism" sounds like actual breakdown dialogue
Still, he's not wrong.
@@oluftheexplorer9476 it's why copyright is bullshit
@@tristanband4003
It's not. It's just abused by big companies. Indie artist live by it.
@@nashvontookus7451 that's nonsense and you know it
@@tristanband4003
No, I KNOW it's not. Bet you don't even know what copyright does. It's invaluable for writers, artists, musicians, etc. You probably just think of UMG when you hear the word "copyright".
The sheer amount of effort that must've went into this is insane. I really hope this gets picked up by the algorithm one day because this deserves 10x the amount of views it has.
I like the idea that the judge might have ruled in Myers' favor if Marge had come up with a better character than "Ghost Mutt."
The ending is like getting a bad ending during the last case.
This was actually VERY GOOD
the ending actually made me really sad and i love how the sad music from Ace attorney fits so well there xD
This is excellent, very good tribute. So many good details. The desk bang sound as he gets up! Well done.
Im surprised this has less than 1k views. This is amazing!
3:44 Nothing like a face palm from a lawyer :D
2:24 I mean, he's actually not wrong. Hearsay & conjecture *DO* count as evidence. They're just not very good evidence.
They just happen to be inadmissible. Other than that they're fine.
@@daviddechamplain5718 That's why they're not *good* evidence.
@@daviddechamplain5718Technically, they are hearsay exceptions. So hearsay are not allowed, except if...
And some of these exceptions have exceptions. So "except if, but not if..."
As for conjecture, they can be difficult to draw a line because while conjectures are not allowed, inferences are allowed.
So what's funny is how good of a representation of a bad lawyer is Lionel Hutz just to say that instead of trying to frame it as something more acceptable. The Simpsons did a great job at portraying a very bad lawyer.
1:59: Should’ve gone for a “Hold it!”
Literally, you could play the ace attorney music over any court hearing, real or fake, and I would pay attention to what everyone is saying. Otherwise, I get bored.
Really highlights how important good music is for a video game or movie. The right kind of music helps spectators become invested in what's happening.
4:40 plays Recollection ~ Heartbroken Maya theme from ACE ATTORNEY!
Lionel Hutz is my spirit animal as a laws student.
I imagine Hutz is popular in the industry
OBJECTION
this piece of media must have more recognition
Doktor Paradox
This was one of my favorite Blue Haired Lawyer scenes of the show. Loved how sarcastic he was and the way he said "Dinner Dog." Great editing by the way
Dinnuh Deeeaaawwwwhhggg
This was excellent man. Only 200 views, unfortunate for a masterpiece of this caliber
Love the fact this scene just straight up has Trilo Quist as one of the surprise witnesses.
I like how they do a little callback to "Itchy & Scratchy & Marge" where Marge's ideas for making the show more kid-friendly ended up tanking the show.
I like how when Chieff Wiggum gets mentioned he turns around to see. It´s like "Am i a fictional character'"?
Sometimes what’s right and what’s best are not the same thing.
This trial was extremely thrilling with the phoenix wright music
This is perfection
How has this fantastic video just NOW graced my recommended. Great job. I had a massive smile on my face the whole time.
4:00
Pursuit ~ Wanting to break the fourth wall
3:23 Came for this, video did not disappoint
Phoenix: Mr Edgeworth, I have sufficient evidence and a witness!
Edgeworth: Well, I have a updated autopsy report!
Phoenix, Augh..ahh.. AHHHHHHHHHH
Phil Hartman and Alex Rocco in the same episode was a blessing on its own, but now i can show this to some Capcom fans i know for a good laugh. nice work!
1:14 The music epic from punch a man
Kind of surprised Homer just had seven hundred and fifty dollars cash on him.
Homer is surprisingly well off
@@graycrest806 Its not even the having of the money and being well off. It's having it in literal cash at that moment in time. That's the kind of well off of criminals. Most well off people carry barely any cash on them.
@@Jotari Lmao yeah it's pretty strange. He didn't have to withdraw it from a bank or anything. Just "bam. Here.you go"
And just hands it over, no questions asked.
@@renakunisaki Ikr. It's insane
Liver and onions (hamburger in the Japanese version)
This deserve so much more views, wtf-
Man. I've had my whole life to say: The animation and writing was so much better and mature back then. Just look at that check at 4:31!
And now that I'm older and watch lawtube, i appreciate this scene/episode EVEN MORE!
Even the surprise witnesses look like the kind of weird goobers you’d see in an Ace Attorney case
>evidence that's not submitted before trial
yeah that's ace attorney alright
2:37 missing the three smash cuts to the judge, prosecution and defence before bart talks
Damn now I want someone to make a rom hack of Ace Attorney but with Simpson characters.
It was over 50 years so the cartoon characters became the public domain.
1:49 Wish more Stan Lee fanboys knew that's what their hero did!
most people do know that lee was more the publisher/editor/face behind marvel. hell, even DC was guilty of the same practices and even killed companies with those practices.
but that was kinda how the industry was back then. some people were aware of this like ditko while others like moore weren't.
As do I buddy as do I
I hate the fact that Stan Lee is praised while Steve Ditko and Jack Kirby are confined to obscurity
Not to mention that if it wasn't for Jack Kirby trying to fight against Marvel for failure to comply with copyright law in the 1970s and 1980s we would not have the current copyright law which guarantees the protections of the individual creators that we have now
@@xsoultillerx no I disagree because when Jack Kirby took Marvel and by extension Stan Lee to court he ripped apart the Marvel ownership and got at least about 1300 pages of his artwork back
granted it was not the best outcome as over the decades there were about 30,000 pages that Jack Kirby drew for Marvel
But it was enough to prove that Marvel was on the wrong side of copyright law and they have never forgotten it
@@rejvaik00 The biggest tragedy was that Kirby fought for comic artist rights and better treatment, but could never take advantage of them. The industry got better but Kirby never got to experience it.
1:22 that's hilarious
“Hamburgers in the JP version” was just perfect.
3:58 top cat is a masterpiece
The only thing it could be improved would have been using the "Logic and Trick" during the first exposition by the procurat... blue haired lawyer. For the rest... perfection!!!
"Chief Wiggum"
:Wiggum looks up:
i'm surprised, i never saw this episode before, 8/10 for the amazing edition
And now I want to see an actual Simpsons game parodying the Ace Attorney series...
Like, no foolin'.
01:03 Never ask a question you don't already know the answer to.
This video is so awesome that it looks like a standalone piece of art.
This was... so good. It fitted so well, and this trial could have easily be in any ace attoney's game.
Imagine a fine actually big enough to matter to a giant corporation 😆
Your character is from.hack// right do you recommend it?
this is a masterpiece
"Your Honor, this is my badge! It proves that I am an attorny!"
"Mr. Hutz this is a drawing on the back of a candy wrapper."
Perfection
HOLD IT!
This is too good.
Please send in Santa's Little Helper for his testimony. 💕💕💕💕💕
I like how chief wiggum looked at Myers Jr when he said chief wiggum
4:49 bart sounds so heartbroken
This ones having an algorithm takeoff, lets go
Algorithm gang
3:36 - Couldv'e objected and said that photo was drawn by Roger Myers Sr with a note of encouragement from Chester J. Lampwick.
So good, there's so much effort put into this
this is underrated, why hasn't this gotten exposure yet
I like the way the blue lawyer says "Dinner Dog"
"Give me 750 dollars"
"Ok"
"Chief Wigan" 🤣🤣🤣 that always gets me 🤣
Translation errors during localization.
What an incredible crossover.
Gotta love that Andy Corney. He makes Art Carney look like a chump! Loved him in the Honeysunners along with Johnny Gleasman.
I had to look up blintzes and my mouth watered. They're like crepes but usually folded around a sweet cheese and pan-fried with maybe some jam on top. Scrumptious looking.
This video is criminally underviewed. It's a masterpiece.
2:24 You should have used the "take that" and giving "evidence" with "plenty of hearsay and conjecture"...
The early part of the second case in Justice For All *does* indicate that the Ace Attorney lawyers occasionally take civil cases, we just never get to do them. Must be during the not insignificant gaps in time between games.
4:52: *(Hamburgers In the JP. ver).*
That kinda killed me xD
"I feel like liver and onions (hamburgers in the JP ver)." LMAO
I've bever seen "The Simpsons" but I can confidently say that I got really invested in this and gasped multiple times.
0:38 I bet that's a parody of Dippy Dog ( or whatever the name was of a certain character before being renamed Goofy)
I remember watching this episode (without the ace attorney editing) on cable, it was a really good episode.
That was simply perfect! Great work!
I've only just realised the Itchy and Scratchy studios have smoke stacks like a factory, implying the production of Itchy and Scratchy is some sort of industrial process.
Over 300k views and still not enough subs to monetizate... Underrated as heck
1:01 thought this would be cross examination but hey video is high quality
3:00 also i swear this is a testimony
At the end it should’ve been Light and Shadow at the film studio
Ace Attorney has the best fandom.
OBJECTION!
-Sustained!