I like watching these. He's more a regular joe like the majority of us with just a passion for photography and aesthetics. I enjoy the channels of the "newest and greatest" tech but this guys is much more relatable to me. It's about a life style, art, the process and meaning. A great photo is more than just the technically sharpest technically perfect image. Or the "latest".
I bought an X-T1 first and I love it. While looking for a autofocus lens, to keep up with my grandson, I managed to come home with a real bargain on X-T3, and 2 Fuji lenses. The X-T3 deal was cheap enough and since it shoots great video, it allowed me to sell all my Micro 4/3 equipment. I still shoot the X-T1 almost daily with mostly vintage lenses. I could care less what the resolution is. I still really like the X-T3 but I take the X-T1 with me more. I love your videos and they have helped me a lot as I regress back into this hobby that I love so much. The Fujifilm cameras are like being back in the good old days, except better, because the film and processing budget went out the window.
My first mirrorless was the XT-1, I had many DSLR’s at the time I bought it, I wanted to upgrade the resolution from 16-24MP so I bought the XT2, at that time the XT4 hadn’t come out yet, to my surprise the image quality wasn’t much better if any better than the XT1. I don’t use the XT1 much anymore, I shoot a good bit with the XT2 with both Fuji lenses and vintage Nikon glass. Fuji really found their niche with the analog controls. I would really like to have the XT5 but it’s more than I care to spend, still happy with my XT2. Composition is king and you don’t need the latest greatest to get great results.
This is great for me. Looking for a smaller second body and leaning towards a XT1. Since, ALL I shoot is vintage glass and don’t care about video. That’s what I’d use my iPhone for.
I've had each of the X-T1, 2 & 3, now on my 2nd X-T2. I think you're right that, image wise, the T1 is the nicest. My wife had an X-T10 with the same sensor & it was just as lovely. The detail with the X-T3 was superb, but for me, the X-T2 is the perfect middle ground. It produces lovely images & I now shoot exclusively jpeg with the X-Weekly recipes. It also has some nicer features menu & control wise than the T1- the two way flip screen, joystick button and I like that it has Acros. I use it with 28 & 50mm Zuiko lenses and think I'll be keeping this X-T2 for quite a while.
It's also hard to argue against getting a used Fuji X-H1 camera. It's bigger than the X-T series, but it has a beefier version of the X-T2 sensor and processor. Importantly, the X-H1 has sensor stabilization, which is perfect for shooting vintage lenses. These cost about $600 used today. Also hard to argue against used X-E2 or X-E3 Fuji cameras. These don't have all the dials and look of a vintage film camera, but they're very small and compact and lovely to use.
Need to mention the razor sharp Schneider tele-xenar 135mm f 3,5 it's a rare gem! Thanks again for your gentle eloquent way of showing us the beauty of photography again! Good job Nigel
I have cameras with the first 3 X-Trans sensors, I, II, & III. Each sensor has its own look and feel, The X-Trans I in my X-E1 is more film like than any of the subsequent ones. It gives a sense of depth and atmosphere in the pictures. The X-Trans II in my X-E2s is my favourite, both the camera itself as well as the pictures it produces. The X-E2s is, in my opinion, just about perfect, 16Mp is more than enough for most purposes, the colours and rendition of light and shade is just sublime. It's a camera I would never get rid of. The X-Trans III in my X-E3 isn't a patch on its predecessor. also, Fuji decided to go touch screen - which I turn off - and joystick instead of D pad - again, a mistake IMO. It does have better resolution - 25Mp, and more exposure compensation control, but my favourit is still the X-E2s. I really like the rangefinder format of the X-E range, they are an unobtrusive camera, ideal for street and candid work. If you've never tried these bodies you're in for a pleasant surprise, but try the X-E2/s first, it's the best of them. George
@@bagzhansadvakassov1093 Depending on the focal length you want, for 50mm or so you can't beat the Helios 44/2, and if you want a wide angle lens the TT Artisans 25mm f2 in native Fuji mount, both those lenses are manual of course, and the Helios will need an M42/FX adapter, but those are cheap enough. The Helios will cost around £30, the adapter no more than £10, and the TT Artisans is currently£69 on Amazon UK. Please adjust prices for your country. If you want fully automatic lenses you really can't beat the 18-55mm kit zoom, but that's about 3 times the cost of the other two. Hope this helps.
Love your videos and honest reviews. I have owned the xt1,2,3,4 and now the xt5. Also some xe series and x-pro2 and 3. In my humble opinion you are absolutely right on the xt1 compared to the followers. It is special as the x-pro2 is. When you decide to upgrade, skip the xt4 and go for the xt5. You will love it. As i think you are a photographer in the first place like i am. Kind regards from Belgium.
I still like the Xtrans 1 in the XPro1. I also have an XT3, but the output of the XPro1 is still fascinating. Although the XPro1 is quirky, and adapting old lenses is much more fun with the better viewfinders of the XTs, the Xtrans 1 can still warm your heart. Conclusion: you need both 😊
I own the x-e2 from Fuji, I’ve bought and sold various Fuji bodies since, but I just cannot let go of this one. I mainly use it with an old 28mm Minolta m mount and I am very pleased with the results!
Ditto. I have an X-T1 & X-T 20 as well, but my more recently purchased X-E2 with the 27mm pancake has become my favorite walk around camera. I could care less about video or action photography. That along with the fact that EyE loves the trans 2 sensor leaves with with no reason to want to “upgrade”. I’ve found my comfort zone.
I love videos celebrating the "older" models that still serve us so well. My x-t2 is beat up, the EVF has burn-in, and I really don't want to have to upgrade. It does under-expose by default, even with no filter. Anyone else have to turn the exp comp up a bit?
I have an X-T2 and I'm thinking about getting a used X-T1 as a backup. A few years ago I did have the X-T3, then, I traded it for Sony, which I fell in love with, using for many years. Then, I decided to go smaller since I was only shooting landscape and the occasional street images. Sony APSC, well, I was lugging around 7 lenses with the body and at 69 yrs of age, that was a bit much. I did purchase several OM bodies and lenses which serve me well, but, I want to get rid of those as well, so, KEH Camera is my only option. I like that old film look, as you. Thanks for the comparison.
I really like your reviews. I already have an X-T3. After listening to your views on the X-T1 and X-T2, I bought the X-T1. And an X-E1 as well (also after hearing your review.) However, as indecisive as I am, I thought maybe I should return the X-T1 and get an X-T2. Then I realized it is my monkey mind at work. So, I think I'll stay put for a while.
I bought the XT-2 , was really unsure if it was right decision as its my first real camera, and i love it !! i love holding it and figuring out how it works. my only regret is not having the "Classic negative " simulation
Picked up an XH-1 the other week -had some low light work and thought I'd try my first Fuji with image stabilisation. Gives the same res and image quality as the XT-2 so a nice combo.
Always love your videos. I started out with Fuji with an X-E1 which has the same sensor as the X-T1. That was the beginning of my love affair with Fuji. I have an X-T2 now which I also love. As I still have the X-E1, I should do some comparisons and let you know if I can see a difference. It's worth mentioning that the X-Ts have cheaper brethren for those on a shoestring budget. They generally give the same results but lose features that you would have to judge for yourself if you can manage without. I certainly loved my X-E1, fantastic camera and the same 'old style' control layout that you will never want to go away from once you use it.
I got Fuji X-pro 1 and X-T1. I got them 2nd hand from a friend. I replaced two Panasonic LX3 and LX5 because I like a bigger sensor. I use the Pro 1 everyday, its in my backpack to work and it have a 18-55mm zoom lens. Replace the 35mm lens because of the bad lens cap. The T1 have a 55-200mm zoom lens and I use it for local wild life on my Sunday walks. The problem with X-T1 is small buttons that make it difficult to use in the winter below -10C
I too had an X-T1, which I foolishly replaced with an X-H1. As good a camera as that was, the images were never on a par with those from the X-T1. I sold the H1, and bought another T1. Then I fell for a T3, and I love the images from it. Not quite the same as T1 images, but pretty good all the same. By the way, I did the same with the XF18-55 and XF16-80. I got rid of the 16-80, and replaced it with another 18-55. If I'd listened to the man who said: if it ain't broke, don't fix it, I'd be much better off money wise! As great as this combination is, I still hanker after after another X-T1.
I have an XT10, bought it as a secondary body but LOVE the Trans 2 sensor and also, it's a beautiful little camera when kitted with a 27mm pancake or 35f2.
I love the XT10, bought it used because it was cheap and paired with a lens I wanted (initially didn't care about the cam). Then found out that I liked the camera a lot more than my XT100. As I am now mostly shooting airshows and on airfields, I prefer zooming out to properly capture my subject and then crop in post. This is why I think about upgrading to a higher resolution
The problem with the rubber parts on the x-t1 is solved by soaking them in gasoline for 30 minutes and drying for a few days, after which they return to their normal shape. They can be glued to the camera with thin 3M double-sided tape. So you can buy x-t1 with bad rubber parts for low price and then easily fix it.
With all love and respect, Nigel, I really can’t see a big difference in the stills I get from my XT-3 versus the older bodies I have had. I probably have a less discerning eye!
Among the X-Trans 1, 2 and 3 sensors, My preference is in this order, X-Trans 2, 1, and 3. For that I sold my X-Pro 2 and keeping my X-T1 and X-E1. Thanks for the review when I am considering an X-T3 because button and dials on the X-T1 have stopped working recently.
I've been using X-T cameras since 2017 when I bought a T20. I currently use an X-T2 and T5 for stills and a T4 which I prefer for video. While the T5 produces lovely images, I have to say I prefer the image output of the T2. It just has a special "look" for me :-) If you like the X-Trans II sensor, why not try an X-E1 which has an X-Trans 1 in it. It's a fantastic little camera.
I've had the XT range up to the 3 and still have the XT3 which I only use with the 50-140 & the 100-400. I also have a lovely old XE1 which was my first Fuji camera & I love it. However recently I convinced myself it would be good to have the flip screen & a rain proof body so I picked up a mint XT2 at a reasonable price to use as my main walk about camera and am so glad I did as much as I love the XE1 I much prefer using the XT line, probably because I grew up using basic SLR's. Sadly due to eye sight problems I can't use MF lenses anymore but thankfully Fuji have a fantastic range of reasonably priced AF prime lenses which are what I use. Cheers & thanks for the content.... 👍
My first Fuji camera was an X-T20. I sold it for an X-T3 and some months ago I bought the X-T1 (for 180 €). I agree that images out of the X-T1 are more atmospheric but there is one major drawback: impossible to use it in Fujifilm X-Raw Studio. On my X-T3 I only shoot raw, using film recipes. In X-Raw Studio you then can export the raw to jpg with the recipes settings. That is not possible with the X-T1. Therefore I set this camera to export RAW + jpg.
I have not been able to use the XT-1 much, however I love the way XT-2 renders images. Still have to fight the noise a bit in raw conversion. I plan on getting an XE-3 (which has the same sensor) when the recent inflation on used Fujifilm cameras passes. Off subject, you should try the Viltrox 23mm. I have managed to get mine to swirl under the right circumstances and it's render reminds me of a few vintage lenses.
EyE agree. I shoot with a gun metal X-T1 & X-E2, both with the trans 2 sensor. You always say you like the trans 2 sensor best by a long shot & yet you always get rid of them after raving about them..... I don’t get it. I’m totally satisfied with mine, wouldn’t even consider trading them in for newer models. I’m just a straight shooter, by the way, with no interest in video or sports captures.
At the moment i shoot the x-trans 2 and 4. and yes the x-trans 2 is very nice, the reason i still keep my X-E2. But honestly I'm not sure if i could distinguish them in a blind test 😉. If any i find the X-trans one to be more "filmic". When i switched from the X-E1 to the X-T10 i was kind of dissapointed at first due to the "harsh" contrasty appearance, but with a little tweaking it was just fine.
I kept my XT1 when I upgraded to the XT3 and I use my 1 very rarely since focus peaking is so much easier for me on the 3 that being said. It’s worth keeping hold of !
Hello, after watching your various videos, I opted a little over a year ago for the XT1. And so I thank you very much, this camera is really fantastic especially when coupled with Karl Zeiss Jena, 50mm and 35mm lenses. I will try the Flektogon 20 mm as well. Thank you for your work and your advice!
Hey I saw something recently and thought of you immediately. It is a little adapter that fits to manual focus lenses and auto focuses them on some auto focus bodies. Its about £400 though.
Nice Video! Which vintage lenses do you use with the X-T1, or which can U recommend? You definitely need an adapter for this retro lenses, isn't it? Tks & Rgds. from Germany!
My initial thought when I first picked up an X Pro3 was that the colours were disappointing compared to the earlier models. I'm over it. There is a setting called Color Chrome Effect, which can be used with any film simulation and offers two levels of intensity (weak and strong). It seems to deepen the colours and give them a bit more pop, especially the reds. I think by default the reds are a bit weak. Perhaps it is something to do with making nicer skin tones in portraits, but it looks awful on a phone box. I keep mine on the weak setting all the time now and generally its all good, but if you want punchier colours, just try the strong setting and see how it looks. I would say experiment with different film sims and the color chrome settings until you find one you like (for me it was Astia with color chrome on weak). Now when I look back to X Trans 2 images, I don't think they are better any more, in fact sometimes the colours can look a bit wrong!
I had X-T1 and now use X-T3. I also noticed that out of camera X-T3 JPEGs look "worse" - perhaps they are less punchy? X-T3 also feels quite a bit noisier in the shadows than the original X-T1. Having said that, I don't care for Fuji film simulations, since I shoot in RAW and apply film looks with RNI in post. There is no contest here - RNI wins in every case. I found Eterna helpful for getting flat RAW-like output, for retaining highlights. X-T1 was great, but I would not go back.
I have an XE 1 and I rented an XT 3 for two days. 1. The XT3 image has become more "mainstream " this factor continues all the way through the range to the HS2. 2. As a Canon user I was blown away by the "flavour " of colours from my X E1❤ 3. As a new guy to Fujifilm, the XT 3 for me was far too powerful and complicated, so therefore it was too easy for me to get into a mess. Generally I think Fujifilm is a Photographic "system" which the new cameras cannot emulate. I think Fujifilm should have a Xtrans 1and 2 sensor simulation for their new cameras.😊
The original Xtrans sensor in the xpro1/XE1,xm1 . Is the best of the x trans line. The processing renders more detail and more natural colors on the Xtrans vs. the 2&3. Regardless of resolution difference. I think its even better than the bayer in my X100 by a smidge.
Not all. the XF-10 has a Bayer sensor. the first X100 also lacked the X-Trans sensor. I think there's a couple of other, lower cost, X-series models that have a Bayer sensor.
I use both the fujifilm xt-1 and the x pro 1 cameras daily , , I like the x pro 1 sensor colors on skin better , the xt-1 is amazing especially with manual lenses
The algorithm is tapping into my confirmation bias. Xt1 owner here. Love this camera. I think the image quality has something to do with the sweet spot of 16mp on crop sensor. My only gripe is the ergonomics of the very recessed push pad on the back.
Look up Sugru moldable hardening putty. I have put this on all my buttons on the X-T1 which make them much easier to press as now they protrude much more with the Sugru.
thanks @@danielcorry4136 Will check it out. Now the leather wrap has started to expand and slip though constant use - I've used good old black duct tape around the edges which now makes my xt-1 look kinda rock n roll in a DIY punk way. Sugru might just add the extra functional touch :)
Another reason you may prefer the X-T1 sensor is the grain structure is more apparent. It adds a bit of character. Grain also blends the various elements of an image into a whole. That can be seen easily when you watch a 1930's film in a repertory theater with their big box screen. The combination of expert lighting, gauze or French nylon material and film grain (and careful development and printing) unifies the imagery. The nylon of course being used for closeups. My Man Godfrey is a good example. Even gorgeous Carol Lombard shots has filters in front of the lens. They may have holes where the eyes are, though. It's all about what they want you to pay attention to. Real artistry.
Have an E2 and an E4. I find the lcd in the E2 lacking and hard to judge proper exposure with full brightness on the screen. I am using sims from x-weekly. I find myself liking the E4 a bit more. But haven’t given the E2 a proper go yet since I just bought it. How is the dynamic range comparison btw these two?
I acquired an XT1 and am really enjoying it with vintage OM 50mm 1.8. Recently tried a used XC 35mm f2 which would not AF down to min focus distance. I passed on the offer. Did i do the right thing?
I used an X-T1 with adapted M42 lenses and loved it until the rubbers started to peel off. Chopped it in for an X-T2 and noticed just like you the image quality was different from the X-T1. I stuck with it though, and now I really like the focus peaking choices and other aids to nail focus. I broke my Zeiss Flecktogon 35mm F2. 4 last year so purchased the Voigtlander Nokton 35mm f1 2 in Fuji mount to replace it. Expensive yes, but other camera features are now available to me within the viewfinder as it talks to the cameras electronics. A real bonus with aging eyesight.
I bought my X-T3 barely used about two years ago and still love it. I think it's one of the best deals these days when you look at performance for the price. I've been messing with some other film simulations and have been liking Pro Neg Hi, Classic Negative and the Film Standard simulations. Fun stuff!! Question: I have a couple vintage lenses, FD50mm f1.8, FD135mm f3.5, Pentax 50mm f1.7. I'd like to get one a bit wider like a 24/28. The FD lenses at that focal length is quite expensive. Any suggestions for other brands? I have adapters for Pentax K mount and Canon FD lenses. I hoped to get one of those two. But, like I said, the prices are kind of high. Have a great weekend!
I use a, generally quite well regarded, Sigma Super Wide II 24mm 2.8 in Pentax K mount. A very nice lens. I´m also using a Pentax M 28mm 3.5 and it is lovely albeit a bit slower but who cares? and finally a Canon FD 50mm 1:1.4 on my Fuji X-T2.
Get DXO pro , you have all the Fuji stuff in there , i shoot Canon 5D and 6D and i get Fuji colors all the time . Its only for Video that you would need different effects . But im sure there is a way for that as well .
Hi Zen, Greetings from Italy and sorry for my english! I love your channel and I’ve been following you for months I'd like to ask you a question about my camera, I have a Fujifilm X-T200, do you advise me to purchase a X-T1 or X-T2 ? Thank you for your work, you put so much passion in these videos! P.S Today a bought a Zenit 122 with a Helios 44M-5 58mm F2 in really good conditions only for 19,60 €!
I think most are in agreement that the earlier Fuji sensors nail the film look better. I don't think there there are any other digital cameras that even come close. My X100T which has the X-Trans II sensor is more 'filmic' than my X-T2 for sure. But they are all good cameras, can't go wrong with Fuji. I have an X100T, X-T2 and an X-T20.
canon 5d classic, Nikon D700 and leica M8 M9 are also in the same League, as I owned them and a bunch of older and current Fuji... But Fuji is best on Jpeg and Simulations
If you own a X100, X-T1, X-E1/E2, it's all good enough - you're settled! Just need a decent lens. Take the 35/F2 XC, if 50mm is your thing, exactly the same IQ, as the XF 25/F2, minus the metal build, minus the aperture ring, minus weather sealing. Glass is all the same, even verified by DPReview. For ~150-180 EUR a steal. Get a XF 18-55/2.8-4 for the X-T1. The X-E, X-Pro series are best being used with small prime lenses, ideally for street. Or the XF 23/F2, which is a perfect 35mm into FF terms, sadly, no cheap XC 23/F2 being avialable here - Fuji, are you listening? If you're on the cheap side, or can't afford the XF lenses, just get the TTArtisan 23/1.4 or 25/F2 lenses, they're great for every Fujifilm X Camera, but these are way cheap. The 50/F1.2 is ideal, if you're shooting portrait, great lens, a steal for the money. As for wideangle, there's the 17/F1.4 lens. But one of the best TTArtisan manual focus lenses is simply the 35/F1.4 lens, if the XC 35/F2 is too expensive for you. For around ~70 bucks, it's a steal, way fast glass, too. I could recommand the 23/F1.4, 35/1.4 and 50/1.2, since i own them all, for Fujifilm, also the 25/F2, it sits on my X-M1 as street cam. Stop wasting money, and to buy every focal length for every system, that you own in terms of gear.
I update my xt1 to xt2. Why ? A bit of all is better but the display is more than a bit better ... with my takumar lenses and a lens turbo all fine on nothing missing .
Greetings! I have XT1 and XE1 and i'd almost sold both! But due to the eby cheater it is not happened! So i think i will let them stay a bit longer whit me;) Thank You dishonest Ebayer! And thank You Zenographer!!!
I’m not sure what you’re talking about when you say the XT4 has a loads and loads and loads of film simulations. They’ve only added two more film simulations based on motion picture, film stock. And I’m not sure what you mean by cooking your own simulations. You can tweak them a little bit but you just can’t create endless simulations. The simulations are the simulations your only controlling parameters that would’ve been available in a dark room.
Nigel, help me out, been watching your videos for a few years now, love the old lens ones best. You are saying the difference in the sensors make a big difference to the final images colours and produce a different style of photo, but in your lens reviews you say they all produce different images, colour rendering and all that. How do you come to your conclusions on the final images, with all the differences around you, is it the camera or lens.
Both sensor (or film) and lens have a role to play in colour reproduction. Sensors play a more major role, lenses adding their more subtle effects on top of that. Hope that helps!
The XT3 colours are too cold, unnaturally cold and the images lack neutral tones. I really really disliked the X100V I had and got rid of it. Fortunatley I got more then I paid for it new after 2 years which is mindboggling, but I won't look back to Fuji in the future.
You like pictures from smallest 16mgpx camera, Don't like really higher pixels sensors. You need to know if You like to get good quality picture on high mgpx sensor You need new lense what with hold this resolution, otherwise You will get worse effect. To 24mpx so small APS-C sensor ( on Full frame this will be about 45mgpx, You need really good and sharp lense. I had this same, better quality camera I buy worse pictures I like. Try on this new camera new verry good quality lenses, and than compare. Don't Use this same lenses from x-t1 16mgox on 26mgpx of X-T3. For older lenses , better is smaller sensor like this 16.
I've bought my X-T1 in order to use my Canon FD-Lenses on there. You're right ... the variation of film-simulations are not as much ... so I decided to shoot on standard anyway. As we all know picture-look comes and goes with the lens in front. So what lens did you use by taking such amazing pictures on the X-T1 you love so much ? I'm using my Canon FD-Lenses (old FD ... not the New-FD !!) ... 1.8 and 1.4 50mm ... and 2.8 28mm in order to compensate 1,6 crop APS-C sensors are coming with. So ... is that combination useful ... or will I ruin that beautiful sensor-look using that lenses ? And .... as someone told before ... Focus-Peaking is not on the point at X-T1 for my opinion .... there still is a small area you are able going throw while peaking tells you "sharp" !! So some pictures might get out of focus using peaking anyway.
I like watching these. He's more a regular joe like the majority of us with just a passion for photography and aesthetics. I enjoy the channels of the "newest and greatest" tech but this guys is much more relatable to me. It's about a life style, art, the process and meaning. A great photo is more than just the technically sharpest technically perfect image. Or the "latest".
I bought an X-T1 first and I love it. While looking for a autofocus lens, to keep up with my grandson, I managed to come home with a real bargain on X-T3, and 2 Fuji lenses. The X-T3 deal was cheap enough and since it shoots great video, it allowed me to sell all my Micro 4/3 equipment. I still shoot the X-T1 almost daily with mostly vintage lenses. I could care less what the resolution is. I still really like the X-T3 but I take the X-T1 with me more. I love your videos and they have helped me a lot as I regress back into this hobby that I love so much. The Fujifilm cameras are like being back in the good old days, except better, because the film and processing budget went out the window.
Bought a X-T1 because of you Nigel, nearly 5 years ago and I still use it and love it everyday. Thanks for the content!
My first mirrorless was the XT-1, I had many DSLR’s at the time I bought it, I wanted to upgrade the resolution from 16-24MP so I bought the XT2, at that time the XT4 hadn’t come out yet, to my surprise the image quality wasn’t much better if any better than the XT1. I don’t use the XT1 much anymore, I shoot a good bit with the XT2 with both Fuji lenses and vintage Nikon glass. Fuji really found their niche with the analog controls. I would really like to have the XT5 but it’s more than I care to spend, still happy with my XT2. Composition is king and you don’t need the latest greatest to get great results.
This is great for me. Looking for a smaller second body and leaning towards a XT1. Since, ALL I shoot is vintage glass and don’t care about video. That’s what I’d use my iPhone for.
I've had each of the X-T1, 2 & 3, now on my 2nd X-T2.
I think you're right that, image wise, the T1 is the nicest. My wife had an X-T10 with the same sensor & it was just as lovely.
The detail with the X-T3 was superb, but for me, the X-T2 is the perfect middle ground.
It produces lovely images & I now shoot exclusively jpeg with the X-Weekly recipes.
It also has some nicer features menu & control wise than the T1- the two way flip screen, joystick button and I like that it has Acros.
I use it with 28 & 50mm Zuiko lenses and think I'll be keeping this X-T2 for quite a while.
OMG me too and I was just out with my xt2 today with a Zuiko 50mm lens... Also have an xt10 that I use for street photography.
It's also hard to argue against getting a used Fuji X-H1 camera. It's bigger than the X-T series, but it has a beefier version of the X-T2 sensor and processor. Importantly, the X-H1 has sensor stabilization, which is perfect for shooting vintage lenses. These cost about $600 used today.
Also hard to argue against used X-E2 or X-E3 Fuji cameras. These don't have all the dials and look of a vintage film camera, but they're very small and compact and lovely to use.
Need to mention the razor sharp Schneider tele-xenar 135mm f 3,5 it's a rare gem! Thanks again for your gentle eloquent way of showing us the beauty of photography again! Good job Nigel
I have cameras with the first 3 X-Trans sensors, I, II, & III.
Each sensor has its own look and feel, The X-Trans I in my X-E1 is more film like than any of the subsequent ones. It gives a sense of depth and atmosphere in the pictures. The X-Trans II in my X-E2s is my favourite, both the camera itself as well as the pictures it produces. The X-E2s is, in my opinion, just about perfect, 16Mp is more than enough for most purposes, the colours and rendition of light and shade is just sublime. It's a camera I would never get rid of.
The X-Trans III in my X-E3 isn't a patch on its predecessor. also, Fuji decided to go touch screen - which I turn off - and joystick instead of D pad - again, a mistake IMO. It does have better resolution - 25Mp, and more exposure compensation control, but my favourit is still the X-E2s.
I really like the rangefinder format of the X-E range, they are an unobtrusive camera, ideal for street and candid work.
If you've never tried these bodies you're in for a pleasant surprise, but try the X-E2/s first, it's the best of them.
George
Can you advice one lense for xe2? Just one.
@@bagzhansadvakassov1093 Depending on the focal length you want, for 50mm or so you can't beat the Helios 44/2, and if you want a wide angle lens the TT Artisans 25mm f2 in native Fuji mount, both those lenses are manual of course, and the Helios will need an M42/FX adapter, but those are cheap enough. The Helios will cost around £30, the adapter no more than £10, and the TT Artisans is currently£69 on Amazon UK. Please adjust prices for your country. If you want fully automatic lenses you really can't beat the 18-55mm kit zoom, but that's about 3 times the cost of the other two.
Hope this helps.
Love your videos and honest reviews. I have owned the xt1,2,3,4 and now the xt5. Also some xe series and x-pro2 and 3. In my humble opinion you are absolutely right on the xt1 compared to the followers. It is special as the x-pro2 is. When you decide to upgrade, skip the xt4 and go for the xt5. You will love it. As i think you are a photographer in the first place like i am. Kind regards from Belgium.
I still like the Xtrans 1 in the XPro1. I also have an XT3, but the output of the XPro1 is still fascinating. Although the XPro1 is quirky, and adapting old lenses is much more fun with the better viewfinders of the XTs, the Xtrans 1 can still warm your heart. Conclusion: you need both 😊
I'm selling my problematic xpro3 and lovely xt1 and been thinking of getting both the xt3 and xpro1. Recommended yeah????
I own the x-e2 from Fuji, I’ve bought and sold various Fuji bodies since, but I just cannot let go of this one. I mainly use it with an old 28mm Minolta m mount and I am very pleased with the results!
Ditto. I have an X-T1 & X-T 20 as well, but my more recently purchased X-E2 with the 27mm pancake has become my favorite walk around camera. I could care less about video or action photography. That along with the fact that EyE loves the trans 2 sensor leaves with with no reason to want to “upgrade”. I’ve found my comfort zone.
Got an XT3 for a bargain yesterday. Already loving it.
I love videos celebrating the "older" models that still serve us so well. My x-t2 is beat up, the EVF has burn-in, and I really don't want to have to upgrade. It does under-expose by default, even with no filter. Anyone else have to turn the exp comp up a bit?
I am another XT-2 user and love the experience .
I have an X-T2 and I'm thinking about getting a used X-T1 as a backup. A few years ago I did have the X-T3, then, I traded it for Sony, which I fell in love with, using for many years. Then, I decided to go smaller since I was only shooting landscape and the occasional street images. Sony APSC, well, I was lugging around 7 lenses with the body and at 69 yrs of age, that was a bit much. I did purchase several OM bodies and lenses which serve me well, but, I want to get rid of those as well, so, KEH Camera is my only option. I like that old film look, as you. Thanks for the comparison.
Good review and discussion. Gotta respect this guy for his knowledge and opinions.
I really like your reviews. I already have an X-T3. After listening to your views on the X-T1 and X-T2, I bought the X-T1. And an X-E1 as well (also after hearing your review.) However, as indecisive as I am, I thought maybe I should return the X-T1 and get an X-T2. Then I realized it is my monkey mind at work. So, I think I'll stay put for a while.
I bought the XT-2 , was really unsure if it was right decision as its my first real camera, and i love it !! i love holding it and figuring out how it works. my only regret is not having the "Classic negative " simulation
Thank you Sir for putting in the efforts. This presentation was helpful.
You are most welcome
Picked up an XH-1 the other week -had some low light work and thought I'd try my first Fuji with image stabilisation. Gives the same res and image quality as the XT-2 so a nice combo.
X-H1 The best camera that Fujifilm ever made. It is built like thunk will last forever.
Always love your videos. I started out with Fuji with an X-E1 which has the same sensor as the X-T1. That was the beginning of my love affair with Fuji. I have an X-T2 now which I also love. As I still have the X-E1, I should do some comparisons and let you know if I can see a difference. It's worth mentioning that the X-Ts have cheaper brethren for those on a shoestring budget. They generally give the same results but lose features that you would have to judge for yourself if you can manage without. I certainly loved my X-E1, fantastic camera and the same 'old style' control layout that you will never want to go away from once you use it.
I got Fuji X-pro 1 and X-T1. I got them 2nd hand from a friend. I replaced two Panasonic LX3 and LX5 because I like a bigger sensor. I use the Pro 1 everyday, its in my backpack to work and it have a 18-55mm zoom lens. Replace the 35mm lens because of the bad lens cap. The T1 have a 55-200mm zoom lens and I use it for local wild life on my Sunday walks. The problem with X-T1 is small buttons that make it difficult to use in the winter below -10C
Thank you…Another very interesting video Nigel and you make me happy that I went and got the XT-1 (Park Cameras excellent condition £319)
I too had an X-T1, which I foolishly replaced with an X-H1. As good a camera as that was, the images were never on a par with those from the X-T1. I sold the H1, and bought another T1. Then I fell for a T3, and I love the images from it. Not quite the same as T1 images, but pretty good all the same. By the way, I did the same with the XF18-55 and XF16-80. I got rid of the 16-80, and replaced it with another 18-55. If I'd listened to the man who said: if it ain't broke, don't fix it, I'd be much better off money wise! As great as this combination is, I still hanker after after another X-T1.
I have an XT10, bought it as a secondary body but LOVE the Trans 2 sensor and also, it's a beautiful little camera when kitted with a 27mm pancake or 35f2.
I love the XT10, bought it used because it was cheap and paired with a lens I wanted (initially didn't care about the cam). Then found out that I liked the camera a lot more than my XT100.
As I am now mostly shooting airshows and on airfields, I prefer zooming out to properly capture my subject and then crop in post. This is why I think about upgrading to a higher resolution
The problem with the rubber parts on the x-t1 is solved by soaking them in gasoline for 30 minutes and drying for a few days, after which they return to their normal shape. They can be glued to the camera with thin 3M double-sided tape. So you can buy x-t1 with bad rubber parts for low price and then easily fix it.
With all love and respect, Nigel, I really can’t see a big difference in the stills I get from my XT-3 versus the older bodies I have had. I probably have a less discerning eye!
Among the X-Trans 1, 2 and 3 sensors, My preference is in this order, X-Trans 2, 1, and 3. For that I sold my X-Pro 2 and keeping my X-T1 and X-E1. Thanks for the review when I am considering an X-T3 because button and dials on the X-T1 have stopped working recently.
I've been using X-T cameras since 2017 when I bought a T20. I currently use an X-T2 and T5 for stills and a T4 which I prefer for video. While the T5 produces lovely images, I have to say I prefer the image output of the T2. It just has a special "look" for me :-)
If you like the X-Trans II sensor, why not try an X-E1 which has an X-Trans 1 in it. It's a fantastic little camera.
I had an xe1 for a short while, and an x pro1 too - that sensor might be the nicest of all!
I've had the XT range up to the 3 and still have the XT3 which I only use with the 50-140 & the 100-400. I also have a lovely old XE1 which was my first Fuji camera & I love it. However recently I convinced myself it would be good to have the flip screen & a rain proof body so I picked up a mint XT2 at a reasonable price to use as my main walk about camera and am so glad I did as much as I love the XE1 I much prefer using the XT line, probably because I grew up using basic SLR's. Sadly due to eye sight problems I can't use MF lenses anymore but thankfully Fuji have a fantastic range of reasonably priced AF prime lenses which are what I use. Cheers & thanks for the content.... 👍
My first Fuji camera was an X-T20. I sold it for an X-T3 and some months ago I bought the X-T1 (for 180 €). I agree that images out of the X-T1 are more atmospheric but there is one major drawback: impossible to use it in Fujifilm X-Raw Studio. On my X-T3 I only shoot raw, using film recipes. In X-Raw Studio you then can export the raw to jpg with the recipes settings. That is not possible with the X-T1. Therefore I set this camera to export RAW + jpg.
I have not been able to use the XT-1 much, however I love the way XT-2 renders images. Still have to fight the noise a bit in raw conversion. I plan on getting an XE-3 (which has the same sensor) when the recent inflation on used Fujifilm cameras passes. Off subject, you should try the Viltrox 23mm. I have managed to get mine to swirl under the right circumstances and it's render reminds me of a few vintage lenses.
hope youre using cap 1
Can't agree more!! X100V + T1
EyE agree. I shoot with a gun metal X-T1 & X-E2, both with the trans 2 sensor. You always say you like the trans 2 sensor best by a long shot & yet you always get rid of them after raving about them..... I don’t get it. I’m totally satisfied with mine, wouldn’t even consider trading them in for newer models. I’m just a straight shooter, by the way, with no interest in video or sports captures.
First batch's of Xt-1 had peeling and door slot bend issues which were soon fixed , just need to check when buying used cheers .
At the moment i shoot the x-trans 2 and 4. and yes the x-trans 2 is very nice, the reason i still keep my X-E2. But honestly I'm not sure if i could distinguish them in a blind test 😉. If any i find the X-trans one to be more "filmic". When i switched from the X-E1 to the X-T10 i was kind of dissapointed at first due to the "harsh" contrasty appearance, but with a little tweaking it was just fine.
I kept my XT1 when I upgraded to the XT3 and I use my 1 very rarely since focus peaking is so much easier for me on the 3 that being said. It’s worth keeping hold of !
Hello, after watching your various videos, I opted a little over a year ago for the XT1. And so I thank you very much, this camera is really fantastic especially when coupled with Karl Zeiss Jena, 50mm and 35mm lenses. I will try the Flektogon 20 mm as well. Thank you for your work and your advice!
Hey I saw something recently and thought of you immediately. It is a little adapter that fits to manual focus lenses and auto focuses them on some auto focus bodies. Its about £400 though.
Nice Video! Which vintage lenses do you use with the X-T1, or which can U recommend? You definitely need an adapter for this retro lenses, isn't it? Tks & Rgds. from Germany!
My initial thought when I first picked up an X Pro3 was that the colours were disappointing compared to the earlier models. I'm over it. There is a setting called Color Chrome Effect, which can be used with any film simulation and offers two levels of intensity (weak and strong). It seems to deepen the colours and give them a bit more pop, especially the reds. I think by default the reds are a bit weak. Perhaps it is something to do with making nicer skin tones in portraits, but it looks awful on a phone box. I keep mine on the weak setting all the time now and generally its all good, but if you want punchier colours, just try the strong setting and see how it looks. I would say experiment with different film sims and the color chrome settings until you find one you like (for me it was Astia with color chrome on weak). Now when I look back to X Trans 2 images, I don't think they are better any more, in fact sometimes the colours can look a bit wrong!
I had X-T1 and now use X-T3. I also noticed that out of camera X-T3 JPEGs look "worse" - perhaps they are less punchy? X-T3 also feels quite a bit noisier in the shadows than the original X-T1.
Having said that, I don't care for Fuji film simulations, since I shoot in RAW and apply film looks with RNI in post. There is no contest here - RNI wins in every case. I found Eterna helpful for getting flat RAW-like output, for retaining highlights. X-T1 was great, but I would not go back.
Nice to know that the Zeiss Pancolors do well with the Fujifilm X series cameras. Now I will just have to try them out.
I love my X-T1 but I really loved my X-T2 before it broke. I pretty much only shoot jpeg, I don't have the time or inclination to edit images.
I have an XE 1 and I rented an XT 3 for two days.
1. The XT3 image has become more "mainstream " this factor continues all the way through the range to the HS2.
2. As a Canon user I was blown away by the "flavour " of colours from my
X E1❤
3. As a new guy to Fujifilm,
the XT 3 for me was far too powerful and complicated, so therefore it was too easy for me to get into a mess.
Generally I think Fujifilm is a Photographic "system" which the new cameras cannot emulate.
I think Fujifilm should have a Xtrans 1and 2 sensor simulation for their new cameras.😊
The original Xtrans sensor in the xpro1/XE1,xm1 . Is the best of the x trans line. The processing renders more detail and more natural colors on the Xtrans vs. the 2&3. Regardless of resolution difference. I think its even better than the bayer in my X100 by a smidge.
Not all. the XF-10 has a Bayer sensor. the first X100 also lacked the X-Trans sensor. I think there's a couple of other, lower cost, X-series models that have a Bayer sensor.
I have several Fujifilm cameras. In my opinion, the X trans Sensor 1 has the best colors. Best regards
I use both the fujifilm xt-1 and the x pro 1 cameras daily , , I like the x pro 1 sensor colors on skin better , the xt-1 is amazing especially with manual lenses
The algorithm is tapping into my confirmation bias. Xt1 owner here. Love this camera. I think the image quality has something to do with the sweet spot of 16mp on crop sensor. My only gripe is the ergonomics of the very recessed push pad on the back.
Look up Sugru moldable hardening putty. I have put this on all my buttons on the X-T1 which make them much easier to press as now they protrude much more with the Sugru.
thanks @@danielcorry4136 Will check it out. Now the leather wrap has started to expand and slip though constant use - I've used good old black duct tape around the edges which now makes my xt-1 look kinda rock n roll in a DIY punk way. Sugru might just add the extra functional touch :)
Another reason you may prefer the X-T1 sensor is the grain structure is more apparent. It adds a bit of character. Grain also blends the various elements of an image into a whole. That can be seen easily when you watch a 1930's film in a repertory theater with their big box screen. The combination of expert lighting, gauze or French nylon material and film grain (and careful development and printing) unifies the imagery. The nylon of course being used for closeups. My Man Godfrey is a good example. Even gorgeous Carol Lombard shots has filters in front of the lens. They may have holes where the eyes are, though. It's all about what they want you to pay attention to. Real artistry.
Definitely better for large prints, and stabilisation would be very nice. Maybe it's time to explore further!
@@zenography7923 I adjusted my entry while you added your comment!
Have an E2 and an E4.
I find the lcd in the E2 lacking and hard to judge proper exposure with full brightness on the screen. I am using sims from x-weekly.
I find myself liking the E4 a bit more. But haven’t given the E2 a proper go yet since I just bought it.
How is the dynamic range comparison btw these two?
My fav for photos are the Xtrans 1 & 3
Another great video! Thank you!
He only uploaded 12 minutes ago. How have you watched it all already? 😂
I acquired an XT1 and am really enjoying it with vintage OM 50mm 1.8. Recently tried a used XC 35mm f2 which would not AF down to min focus distance. I passed on the offer. Did i do the right thing?
I used an X-T1 with adapted M42 lenses and loved it until the rubbers started to peel off. Chopped it in for an X-T2 and noticed just like you the image quality was different from the X-T1.
I stuck with it though, and now I really like the focus peaking choices and other aids to nail focus.
I broke my Zeiss Flecktogon 35mm F2. 4 last year so purchased the Voigtlander Nokton 35mm f1 2 in Fuji mount to replace it. Expensive yes, but other camera features are now available to me within the viewfinder as it talks to the cameras electronics. A real bonus with aging eyesight.
I bought my X-T3 barely used about two years ago and still love it. I think it's one of the best deals these days when you look at performance for the price. I've been messing with some other film simulations and have been liking Pro Neg Hi, Classic Negative and the Film Standard simulations. Fun stuff!! Question: I have a couple vintage lenses, FD50mm f1.8, FD135mm f3.5, Pentax 50mm f1.7. I'd like to get one a bit wider like a 24/28. The FD lenses at that focal length is quite expensive. Any suggestions for other brands? I have adapters for Pentax K mount and Canon FD lenses. I hoped to get one of those two. But, like I said, the prices are kind of high. Have a great weekend!
I use a, generally quite well regarded, Sigma Super Wide II 24mm 2.8 in Pentax K mount. A very nice lens. I´m also using a Pentax M 28mm 3.5 and it is lovely albeit a bit slower but who cares? and finally a Canon FD 50mm 1:1.4 on my Fuji X-T2.
@@ea4bl Thank-you!! I'll have to check out that 24 Pentax K mount. Have a good one!
Sometimes I regret selling my old x100S. Autofocus sucked but when it hit everything perfect the photos were amazing
Get DXO pro , you have all the Fuji stuff in there , i shoot Canon 5D and 6D and i get Fuji colors all the time . Its only for Video that you would need different effects . But im sure there is a way for that as well .
You may have already said this, so sorry, are these straight out of the cameras or are they processed? You have a gift sir. Beautiful photos.
I would argue that Capture one is the best match with Fuji cameras (i had xt1 xt2, x100t, xpro 1 and 2, x100v) when considering post processing
I use manual lenses and only shoot BW. My XT1 is more than adequate until it calls it a day.
Hi Zen, Greetings from Italy and sorry for my english! I love your channel and I’ve been following you for months
I'd like to ask you a question about my camera, I have a Fujifilm X-T200, do you advise me to purchase a X-T1 or X-T2 ?
Thank you for your work, you put so much passion in these videos!
P.S Today a bought a Zenit 122 with a Helios 44M-5 58mm F2 in really good conditions only for 19,60 €!
I think most are in agreement that the earlier Fuji sensors nail the film look better. I don't think there there are any other digital cameras that even come close. My X100T which has the X-Trans II sensor is more 'filmic' than my X-T2 for sure. But they are all good cameras, can't go wrong with Fuji. I have an X100T, X-T2 and an X-T20.
canon 5d classic, Nikon D700 and leica M8 M9 are also in the same League, as I owned them and a bunch of older and current Fuji... But Fuji is best on Jpeg and Simulations
I think X-H1 is also soft. Try setting the sharpness in your X-T3 on minus 1
If you own a X100, X-T1, X-E1/E2, it's all good enough - you're settled! Just need a decent lens. Take the 35/F2 XC, if 50mm is your thing, exactly the same IQ, as the XF 25/F2, minus the metal build, minus the aperture ring, minus weather sealing. Glass is all the same, even verified by DPReview. For ~150-180 EUR a steal. Get a XF 18-55/2.8-4 for the X-T1. The X-E, X-Pro series are best being used with small prime lenses, ideally for street. Or the XF 23/F2, which is a perfect 35mm into FF terms, sadly, no cheap XC 23/F2 being avialable here - Fuji, are you listening? If you're on the cheap side, or can't afford the XF lenses, just get the TTArtisan 23/1.4 or 25/F2 lenses, they're great for every Fujifilm X Camera, but these are way cheap. The 50/F1.2 is ideal, if you're shooting portrait, great lens, a steal for the money. As for wideangle, there's the 17/F1.4 lens. But one of the best TTArtisan manual focus lenses is simply the 35/F1.4 lens, if the XC 35/F2 is too expensive for you. For around ~70 bucks, it's a steal, way fast glass, too. I could recommand the 23/F1.4, 35/1.4 and 50/1.2, since i own them all, for Fujifilm, also the 25/F2, it sits on my X-M1 as street cam.
Stop wasting money, and to buy every focal length for every system, that you own in terms of gear.
Thank you
can u do a review of 5d2 with 11a on.thanyou Nigel
Got my gf an X-t1 and as her first camera, now she's got the camera bug! :D
I update my xt1 to xt2. Why ? A bit of all is better but the display is more than a bit better ... with my takumar lenses and a lens turbo all fine on nothing missing .
In Argentina, a used Fujifilm X-T1 camera costs £2,550. (today, February 13, 2023) It is unattainable!
So why didn’t you go for the X-T1?
I got a 2nd hand Nikon D700 it produce nice pictures too. Only 12 Mpix
Greetings!
I have XT1 and XE1 and i'd almost sold both! But due to the eby cheater it is not happened! So i think i will let them stay a bit longer whit me;) Thank You dishonest Ebayer! And thank You Zenographer!!!
I’m not sure what you’re talking about when you say the XT4 has a loads and loads and loads of film simulations. They’ve only added two more film simulations based on motion picture, film stock. And I’m not sure what you mean by cooking your own simulations. You can tweak them a little bit but you just can’t create endless simulations. The simulations are the simulations your only controlling parameters that would’ve been available in a dark room.
Perhaps you haven’t checked out the Fuji weekly website? If not, you’re in for a surprise - enjoy!
Nigel, help me out, been watching your videos for a few years now, love the old lens ones best. You are saying the difference in the sensors make a big difference to the final images colours and produce a different style of photo, but in your lens reviews you say they all produce different images, colour rendering and all that. How do you come to your conclusions on the final images, with all the differences around you, is it the camera or lens.
Both sensor (or film) and lens have a role to play in colour reproduction. Sensors play a more major role, lenses adding their more subtle effects on top of that. Hope that helps!
Fujifilm may be inside it, eg Provia 100 - but the camera shown is a Nikon FE2, no doubt about that. So do not make this mistake!
should probably pull some vampire out of the color balance 😜🥰
I got a new Xt1 from walmart. They are available $700
I just copped a XH1 for 500 and I feel like I just robbed the camera store
It'll be a very sad day when my X-T1 expires .
A sad day indeed.
Its the user overall not the camera.
EXPERIMENT. Drop the file size on the X-T2 and see if it starts to look more like an X-T1.
Oooh, oooh, good idea, well worth trying.
What was the conclusion of this experiment?
@@michaelwarren824 Well, I don't have the X-T1...
The XT3 colours are too cold, unnaturally cold and the images lack neutral tones. I really really disliked the X100V I had and got rid of it. Fortunatley I got more then I paid for it new after 2 years which is mindboggling, but I won't look back to Fuji in the future.
You won't get these cameras for anything like those prices today, sadly.
not affordable anymore, hard to find now and people have thrown it in the dumpster the kind of conditions they sell them and for the amounts.
David Camera for Prime Minister
You like pictures from smallest 16mgpx camera, Don't like really higher pixels sensors. You need to know if You like to get good quality picture on high mgpx sensor You need new lense what with hold this resolution, otherwise You will get worse effect. To 24mpx so small APS-C sensor ( on Full frame this will be about 45mgpx, You need really good and sharp lense. I had this same, better quality camera I buy worse pictures I like. Try on this new camera new verry good quality lenses, and than compare. Don't Use this same lenses from x-t1 16mgox on 26mgpx of X-T3. For older lenses , better is smaller sensor like this 16.
I've bought my X-T1 in order to use my Canon FD-Lenses on there.
You're right ... the variation of film-simulations are not as much ... so I decided to shoot on standard anyway.
As we all know picture-look comes and goes with the lens in front. So what lens did you use by taking such amazing pictures on the X-T1 you love so much ?
I'm using my Canon FD-Lenses (old FD ... not the New-FD !!) ... 1.8 and 1.4 50mm ... and 2.8 28mm in order to compensate 1,6 crop APS-C sensors are coming with.
So ... is that combination useful ... or will I ruin that beautiful sensor-look using that lenses ?
And .... as someone told before ...
Focus-Peaking is not on the point at X-T1 for my opinion .... there still is a small area you are able going throw while peaking tells you "sharp" !!
So some pictures might get out of focus using peaking anyway.