Abarth 595 VS Mini Cooper SE - Drag Race - Estadio Algarve!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ต.ค. 2024
  • Comparing the Abarth 595 and the Mini Cooper SE in a drag race at the Estadio Algarve is an exciting prospect, as both cars offer unique performance characteristics. Here’s a detailed comparison based on their specifications and potential performance in a drag race scenario:
    Abarth 595
    Engine: 1.4-liter turbocharged inline-4
    Power Output: Approximately 160-180 hp (varies by model and tune)
    Torque: Around 170-184 lb-ft
    Transmission: 5-speed manual or 5-speed automatic
    Drivetrain: Front-wheel drive (FWD)
    0-60 mph (0-100 km/h): Approximately 6.7-7.5 seconds (varies by model)
    Weight: Around 1,100 kg (2,425 lbs)
    Mini Cooper SE (Electric)
    Engine: Electric motor
    Power Output: 181 hp
    Torque: 199 lb-ft
    Transmission: Single-speed automatic
    Drivetrain: Front-wheel drive (FWD)
    0-60 mph (0-100 km/h): Approximately 6.9 seconds
    Weight: Around 1,365 kg (3,010 lbs)
    Drag Race Considerations
    Power and Torque:
    The Mini Cooper SE has slightly more horsepower and significantly more torque compared to the Abarth 595. Electric motors provide instant torque, giving the Mini an advantage in initial acceleration.
    Weight:
    The Abarth 595 is lighter than the Mini Cooper SE. Lower weight generally contributes to better acceleration, potentially offsetting the Mini’s torque advantage to some extent.
    Traction and Drivetrain:
    Both cars are front-wheel drive, which can limit traction compared to rear-wheel or all-wheel drive configurations, especially with high torque.
    Transmission:
    The Mini’s single-speed automatic transmission is highly efficient and consistent, while the Abarth’s manual or automatic options can vary in shift times and driver involvement.
    Potential Outcome
    Initial Acceleration:
    The Mini Cooper SE’s instant electric torque could give it a slight edge off the line, allowing it to launch quickly.
    Mid to High Speed:
    The Abarth 595, with its turbocharged engine, may catch up or even overtake the Mini Cooper SE as speeds increase, depending on how quickly it can shift through gears and utilize its turbo boost.
    Conclusion
    Close Competition:
    Given the Mini Cooper SE’s instant torque and the Abarth 595’s lighter weight and potentially higher top-end power, the drag race would likely be very close. The initial launch may favor the Mini, but the Abarth could make up ground as the race progresses.
    Track Conditions:
    The surface and grip conditions at Estadio Algarve, as well as the drivers’ skill in launching and shifting (for the Abarth), will play crucial roles in determining the winner.
    Overall, while the Mini Cooper SE might have an early advantage due to its electric torque, the Abarth 595 could potentially close the gap as the race progresses. It would be an exciting and closely matched race!
    At Drivenmad, we repair, maintain and upgrade vehicles in our workshop, here in the sunny Algarve, Portugal.
    Most things are our first go ! so remember, experts we are not ! so watch us do it wrong, so you don't have too :)
    Having hundreds of kilometres of dirt roads, dirt tracks and various hills with ruts on our doorstep, we venture out and test our 4x4’s to the limit (our limit, not theirs  )
    When we can get one, we will slip in a vehicle review, along with some product testing - who does not want to know which tyre stops the best ?
    So subscribe and join our journey as we modify, test and improve our cars in as many ways as possible.
    You must love the tunes - so make sure to check out “Death Of Guitar Pop” for some awesome music!
    Their TH-cam: www.youtube.co....
    Their Instagram: @deathofguitarpop
    For free background music - our thanks goes to:
    records.strobot...
    ketsa.uk//
    www.roelandrui...
    scottholmesmusic.com
    #minicooper
    #abarth595
    #dragrace

ความคิดเห็น • 20

  • @xntrix
    @xntrix 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Excellent, great smile at the end ❤

    • @DrivenMadShow
      @DrivenMadShow  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Always love a winning smile

  • @Felix-fy7ki
    @Felix-fy7ki 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    What happened to the Pandas 4x4? I didn't see them for ages!

    • @DrivenMadShow
      @DrivenMadShow  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Flogged both a while back, error on my part getting shot of the newer one, but brain power not my strongest attribute :(

    • @Felix-fy7ki
      @Felix-fy7ki 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@DrivenMadShow😮 I'd also not be happy selling our's!

    • @DrivenMadShow
      @DrivenMadShow  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I traded it against the Abarth for Nathans 21st (the only surprise gift thing I have ever done in my life) so I did enjoy that part - as I had my Jeep, it was a cash thing - cash always is the mother of all evil 🤣

  • @farrodel-mar5773
    @farrodel-mar5773 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Would have put money on it

  • @DesignGroup1
    @DesignGroup1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Where are you?

    • @DrivenMadShow
      @DrivenMadShow  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We were at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Est%C3%A1dio_Algarve - very interesting place, but little used.

  • @ballygarran
    @ballygarran 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Now keep doing that all day and then the true limitations of EV’s are exposed.
    I’m not in love with EV’s in the slightest. The technology is as far as it can progress and very little is spoken about the true cost to human suffering extracting the minerals to make batteries.
    People will wake up eventually to the con regarding Net Zero

    • @DrivenMadShow
      @DrivenMadShow  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂 Very amusing, and very uneducated - The extraction of minerals for batteries and the use of fossil fuels both have significant environmental and human costs. These impacts vary widely in their nature and severity, affecting different populations and ecosystems in unique ways. Here's a comparative analysis of the key issues associated with each:
      1. Mineral Extraction for Batteries
      Human Suffering:
      Labor Conditions: Cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) involves child labor, hazardous working conditions, and human rights abuses. Artisanal miners often work without protective equipment, facing risks of injury and death.
      Health Impacts: Prolonged exposure to dust and chemicals in mining areas can lead to respiratory problems and other health issues for miners and nearby communities.
      Displacement: Mining operations can lead to the displacement of local communities, loss of livelihoods, and disruption of traditional ways of life.
      Environmental Impacts:
      Habitat Destruction: Mining activities destroy habitats, leading to biodiversity loss.
      Water Pollution: Toxic chemicals used in mining processes can contaminate local water sources, affecting both ecosystems and human health.
      Soil Degradation: Mining disrupts soil structure and fertility, making land unsuitable for agriculture.
      2. Fossil Fuel Extraction and Use
      Human Suffering:
      Labor Conditions: Workers in the oil and gas industry face dangerous working conditions, including risks of explosions, accidents, and long-term health issues due to exposure to toxic substances.
      Community Health: Communities near drilling sites often experience higher rates of respiratory problems, cancer, and other health issues due to air and water pollution.
      Economic Impact: While oil-rich regions can experience economic booms, they also suffer from the "resource curse," where reliance on fossil fuels leads to economic instability, corruption, and conflict.
      Environmental Impacts:
      Oil Spills: Accidental oil spills, such as the Deepwater Horizon spill, cause catastrophic damage to marine ecosystems, killing wildlife and destroying habitats.
      Air Pollution: Burning fossil fuels releases pollutants (e.g., sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter) that cause smog, acid rain, and respiratory problems in humans.
      Climate Change: Fossil fuel combustion is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions, driving global climate change and its associated impacts, including extreme weather events, sea-level rise, and ecological disruptions.
      Fracking: Hydraulic fracturing (fracking) for natural gas involves injecting high-pressure fluids into the ground, leading to groundwater contamination, induced seismic activity, and methane emissions.
      Comparative Analysis
      Scope and Scale: The fossil fuel industry operates on a massive scale, contributing significantly to global energy supply but also to environmental degradation and climate change. The battery industry, while rapidly growing, currently has a smaller footprint but is still significant, particularly in regions where key minerals are sourced.
      Environmental Impact: Fossil fuel extraction and use have broader and more severe environmental impacts, particularly regarding climate change. Battery production has localized environmental impacts, but the global shift towards renewables and battery storage is seen as essential to reducing overall greenhouse gas emissions.
      Human Suffering: Both industries have significant human costs, but they manifest differently. Fossil fuel extraction often affects broader populations through pollution and climate change, whereas battery mineral extraction heavily impacts specific communities, particularly in the Global South.
      Conclusion
      The true cost of both battery mineral extraction and fossil fuel use involves complex trade-offs between meeting current energy demands and mitigating long-term environmental and social impacts. Transitioning to renewable energy and improving mining practices are essential steps towards reducing the overall human and environmental costs associated with both industries. Moreover, implementing stricter regulations, promoting ethical sourcing, and investing in recycling technologies for batteries can help mitigate some of the adverse effects associated with battery production.

    • @ballygarran
      @ballygarran 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@DrivenMadShow Jesus, you’re well into the cult. I’ll remove my subscription. Up to this point a very entertaining channel

    • @RalphLauren449
      @RalphLauren449 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I recon they are both equally bad to make/manufacture, but in the long term EV’s will definitely outlast combustion engines. Plus they aren’t polluting as you drive down the street. Don’t get the hate for them really.
      I just got a long range old (2021) model 3 and it can do fast accelerations as long as my old 330i could before needing to fill up.
      Good vid DrivenMad. I won’t be unsubscribing anytime soon 👀

    • @DrivenMadShow
      @DrivenMadShow  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Whoops - sorry for the above, Nath tells me he is the adult ! - I like to creep the odd person out who talks crap - quite good at it as it happens 🙈 Nath has his eye on a Model S - the prices here have plummeted, a very rare thing in Portugal - cars hold their value beyond belief - we both love how ev's drive, to be honest, I don't really care how its powered, it's just an option - when I had hair, a diesel was unbearably slow and horrible; 20 years later you can get a diesel RS Audi ? the speed in which ev's have progressed is incredible when you stop and think about it and how Tesla has become a motoring power house is beyond my comprehension - lastly, thanks for the sub and putting up with us, we do actually really appreciate it 🥰

    • @taskm-g8i
      @taskm-g8i 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Are you for real