Peter Hitchens | Predictions on China

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @kaylenehousego8929
    @kaylenehousego8929 3 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    " to seize control of a culture "....this is vivid in Australia currently and world wide from what I can see.

    • @Minchya
      @Minchya 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Please explain ?

    • @robertblue3795
      @robertblue3795 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      How?

    • @MrZakatista
      @MrZakatista ปีที่แล้ว

      I was shocked visiting Australia (after many years) at the regression of the "media". It is now completely naive and infantile. The same attitudes have permeated public companies, and I assume the education system.

  • @larshoffmann7
    @larshoffmann7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    Please give Peter Hitchens a good microphone!!

    • @peetsnort
      @peetsnort 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Or elocution lessons

    • @anthonyferris8912
      @anthonyferris8912 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      and a new shirt without a frayed collar.

    • @tombristowe846
      @tombristowe846 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@peetsnort I agree. I've always found him a bit hard to hear. He seems to rush through the less important parts of sentences that join the more salient bits that he wants to emphasize, leaving you trying to guess what he has said. I don't really want to be looking right up his nostrils either, now I think about it.

    • @peetsnort
      @peetsnort 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tombristowe846 yes I really hate it when people are saying something interesting and then they swallow and muffle the end of the sentence for effect.
      Spit it out man and stop grandstanding... Lol

    • @BatteryAz1z
      @BatteryAz1z 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@peetsnort Maybe he likes the sound of his own voice so much that he likes to eat his words :p

  • @kaylenehousego8929
    @kaylenehousego8929 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    The control which has been and continues to be exercised, is via a lot more than technology, so is the silence about this yet another elephant in the room ?

  • @REwing
    @REwing 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Listening from NZ,, we need to wake up 99 percent of our country, think they have gone fishing!!!!!

    • @ralphlee6386
      @ralphlee6386 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Or cowering in their hovels due to the covid scam...

  • @royhay5741
    @royhay5741 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    John Anderson can't leave Peter Hitchens alone! Haha, great interview with you two as always.

  • @naguoning
    @naguoning 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Taiwan is VERY much defensible. Taiwan is a volcanic island with literally only about 12 plausible landing points all of which are well guarded. McArthur correctly referred to Taiwan as his "unsinkable aircraft carrier" with good reason. Taiwan is the most liberal (Liberal used as in = freedom rather than the Australian political party or USA meaning of implication of left wing) democracy in Asia. Japan in particularly understands they are next if we (I am a citizen of Taiwan) was invaded. The parallels with Nazi Germany/1930s Japan for the CCP are VERY valid but I believe that a number of other countries around us understand how dangerous the CCP is.

    • @creddesignmatters6855
      @creddesignmatters6855 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Spot on...aside from TSMC's income/net worth the reality that the 1st world can not really function without semiconductors is dawning...as is the fact that China is running out of young people to produce and consume - countries with definitive 'Absolute Advantages' will be targeted by the CCP, particularly those tied to food production...

    • @mw89181
      @mw89181 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think the idea Peter is articulating is that, if Chinese economic and technological growth continues, they won’t have to land any craft on your shores. They will be able to annihilate your resistance from hundreds of miles away through ballistic missiles, biological warfare, or digital espionage.

    • @scottwatrous7649
      @scottwatrous7649 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I generally agree but admit I am not strategically literate. I think I can say confidently that key to any defense of Taiwan would be will.

    • @lorenzomagazzeni5425
      @lorenzomagazzeni5425 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It would be easier to invade Australia...

    • @shaughnfourie304
      @shaughnfourie304 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I AM WITH YOU DEAR TAIWAN THE TRUE CHINA

  • @jakedee4117
    @jakedee4117 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    "A communist is a communist is a communist". Try telling that to Trotsky and Lenin, That's just lazy thinking. Particularly wrong when it comes to the Chinese, they aren't running their society based on 19th century German Jewish social philosopher and even less on some 18th century French revolutionaries. The CCP is a deeply conservative group of Mandarins following some very old Chinese models. China had house hold registrations, ID forms and travel permits two thousand years ago. Westerns need to work out if what they fear is China doing things badly and failing or doing things well and succeeding.

    • @scottwatrous7649
      @scottwatrous7649 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We've called it Oriental despotism for a very long time as well.

    • @jakedee4117
      @jakedee4117 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@scottwatrous7649 What ever that is, it's very different from Anderson's "A communist is a communist is a communist" and very different from Karl Marx's dictatorship of the proletariat.

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      German Jewish Social Philosopher
      That is pure nonsense.

    • @vladivanov5500
      @vladivanov5500 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      "they aren't running their society based on 19th century German Jewish social philosopher"
      They are. Marx has been a household name in China for years and up until the 2016 election I dare say was more broadly known in China than in the West (I read Chinese).
      CCP reaffirmed their pro-Marxist stance not so long ago in launching education reform which they said would serve to further emphasize Marxist values.

    • @jakedee4117
      @jakedee4117 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bighands69 What is it that you find nonsensical ? That Karl Marx was German, Jewish, or a social philosopher ?

  • @tombristowe846
    @tombristowe846 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I'm a big fan of John Anderson and Peter Hitchens. With so much important stuff happening on line now I think Peter Hitchens should get some better equipment as sitting one foot from your lap top as in a zoom call doesn't work very well. I find it quite hard work listening to him and I really want to hear what he has to say.

  • @adamday2067
    @adamday2067 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Your interviews are always excellent John. Please keep doing them.

  • @kaylenehousego8929
    @kaylenehousego8929 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    " driving out the remaining precepts of Christianity " and as the domino effect of all that this actually entails continues , the next generation have no idea where all of this church of 'nice' is going to take us and we are all very preoccupied with.... keeping the adult kids happy n n close by along with - being comfortable, for now.

    • @JustaBritinChina
      @JustaBritinChina 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not my experience of being a Christian in China.

    • @Rowarst
      @Rowarst 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JustaBritinChina It was my experience as a Christian in mainland China.

    • @JustaBritinChina
      @JustaBritinChina 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Rowarst personally I think the remaining precepts of Christianity are more under attack in the West; what's left of them. But then that doesn't fit into your anti China narrative, does it. If you stay within the law, it's perfectly legal and acceptable to be a full on disciple of Christ in China.

    • @vladivanov5500
      @vladivanov5500 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JustaBritinChina "If you stay within the law"
      That's a very broad brush in mainland China.

  • @mekuranda
    @mekuranda 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Shocking sound on Peter Hitchens

  • @vinm300
    @vinm300 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hitchens is no military strategist.
    China is blockaded using submarines, the 110-mile Taiwan straits are defended likewise.
    The US have just built 19 Virginia class nuclear submarines.
    AUKUS was all about submarines - 9 nuclear.
    Blockade would collapse the CCP, and huge life loss crossing to Taiwan would also
    threaten to collapse the CCP.

    • @kevinherbert4256
      @kevinherbert4256 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ha ha ha....blockade?...ha ha ha ha.......

    • @vinm300
      @vinm300 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kevinherbert4256 Ask yourself what was AUKUS all about ?
      It was about Australian submarines. Now ask yourself why ?
      Because China can hit surface ships with missiles.
      China's weakness has always been geographical : it depends upon imports (and economically upon exports) and it is very easily blockaded.
      Also, crossing the 110 miles to invade Taiwan is virtually impossible with packs of submarines around.

    • @johnboy14
      @johnboy14 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vinm300 history backs this up, look at the English channel in WW2. Once you're on the open sea, you are hugely exposed.

  • @gelbsucht947
    @gelbsucht947 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Peter doesn’t start speaking till 1:52.

  • @twoforty252
    @twoforty252 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    all these discussions between these intellectuals is fruitless, all their doing is rearranging the deck chairs like on the titanic and that ship sank

    • @erict.35
      @erict.35 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      👍🏻

    • @1978SOOTY
      @1978SOOTY 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Best analogy I've ever heard.

    • @erict.35
      @erict.35 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@noname-nd8ec whatt?

    • @fredoldfield7538
      @fredoldfield7538 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well, basically speaking, that is exactly the situation each one of us is in, isn’t it? So get rearranging those deck chairs to suit yourself….

    • @berniethejet
      @berniethejet 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Neither of these fellows are 'intellectuals', though, are they?

  • @nockianlifter661
    @nockianlifter661 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It’s not capitalism if it’s trading by state privilege. Capitalism is the freedom to trade based on the principle of individual rights - primarily property rights. There is no such thing as state capitalism, the actual term is central planning.

    • @dre6289
      @dre6289 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      While there is central planning of currency, we don’t have capitalism anywhere.

    • @nockianlifter661
      @nockianlifter661 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dre6289 pretty much we don’t. We have a mixed economy, neither one thing or another. Essentially a mix of legalised looting from the productive. It’s capitalism as an ox yoked to an increasingly heavy socialist cart.

  • @likklej8
    @likklej8 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I love wishful thinking videos China has been an Empire for over two thousand years they’re not going to change. Whatever name you hang on the administration system there.

  • @pc1972
    @pc1972 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Australian wealth derives from the ore, coal and energy it sells to China. The Chinese elite own homes, estates and farmland across the continent. The Australian armed forces could never defend Australia. Australia is reliant on the US 7th Fleet for defence. 25 million people live in Australia, 270 million live just north in Indonesia and 1.4 billion in China. A large number of young Australians want to break with UK and have closer ties with their SEAsian neighbours. For two decades at least, Australians have enjoyed a remarkable , almost decadent, dream like 'lifestyle'. Well folks...gravity.

    • @ralphlee6386
      @ralphlee6386 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Quantify "large numbers", please. With supporting evidence if you will.

    • @mikeoglen6848
      @mikeoglen6848 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I used to think Emperor Hirohito would replace H M Queen as Head of State in Australia - I was wrong, it will be President Xi...

    • @scottwatrous7649
      @scottwatrous7649 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Excellent question

    • @shaughnfourie304
      @shaughnfourie304 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      THOSE WHO WANT TO KNEEL TO THE EVIL CHINESE COMMUNIST REGIME ARE TRAITORS

    • @scottwatrous7649
      @scottwatrous7649 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @shaughne - It's not that simple. Modern China greatly helped in development by many liberal democracies. Many transnational corps intimately entwined. We must resist "chinafacation" in our own nations. It's a house afire!

  • @susanbookman1631
    @susanbookman1631 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It is very difficult to understand him. :-(.

    • @johnwhite626
      @johnwhite626 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      He mumbles and is a lazy speaker.

  • @bogthing1
    @bogthing1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Perfectly grim.

  • @keithcroissant5640
    @keithcroissant5640 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nothing to report here, apart from the audio.

  • @CatETru
    @CatETru ปีที่แล้ว

    "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics", is how they describe it now I believe it is. Not Communism with Chinese Characteristics. I could be wrong though.

  • @robertnicholson1409
    @robertnicholson1409 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Anderson, are you asking a question or making a statement ? Talk about laboring the point !

  • @YHWHsavesDotCom
    @YHWHsavesDotCom 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Without a vision, people perish in anarchy and chaos. Blessed are those who obey the instructions of God. Prov. 29:18. God gave us the PLAN for world salvation. The sooner we UNITE in the plan, the less collateral damage will be realized after it's all said and done. Apart from obedience, no flesh will be saved.

    • @jackmurphy6864
      @jackmurphy6864 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Your imaginary friend (whichever one you've picked from a long list of candidates) won't do anything. Never has, never will.

  • @sandman5211
    @sandman5211 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Once a Trotskyist, always a Trotskyist

    • @scottwatrous7649
      @scottwatrous7649 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Anybody who understands the history of this crew must suspect Hitchens. If he's legit he understands that. You can certainly see his mindset of being at least outside, if not above.

  • @Scythwolf
    @Scythwolf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I really believe that it is worrysome in the next 20 years. But they have a neighbors, not only Japan and South Korea, but also India which is massively increasing its military force. I believe in 2027 India will have more people than china. My guess is that by 2050 India will surpass China since there is no reason to produce in China anymore. India will get richer and the conflicts between those 2 will increase. Meanwhile the european countries will get closer together. Even now - with all the dissent - they are way closer than 20 years ago. Finally I also thing the the european - US / Canadian / Australian (and in its shadow also Japanese / South Korea) Axis will get way more important. Don't forget: Europe has about 550 Mio people right now, america 320 Mio and with the rest - this is huge. Also the landmass this axis controlls is immense.
    Until this century is gone the democratic states will build structures consisting of several states which finally end in influence spheres like: Western states (+some asian/aftican/souther american states), Russian sphere, China, India (both have no sphere as I'd say), African Countries.

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Population and size of military force does not mean it is better. Germany in WW2 crushed the Russian military in Barbarossa even though Russia had superior numbers.

    • @Scythwolf
      @Scythwolf 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bighands69 definitely, that's right. Size is only one factor in a pool of factors.

    • @vladivanov5500
      @vladivanov5500 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Moving mass production to India would certainly be an improvement for the world than being beholden to the CCP.

  • @koroglurustem1722
    @koroglurustem1722 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    There are no predictions here

  • @BatteryAz1z
    @BatteryAz1z 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Mumbles Hutchens. Please make an effort.

  • @linguistengineer588
    @linguistengineer588 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm surprised Mr Hitchins does not mention the huge current and impending economic problems in China, and their implications for China and the USA over the next couple of years.

    • @tritium1998
      @tritium1998 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's only "impending" because it's not happening like you imps can only wish, hence your crying.

  • @AndyWearsPants
    @AndyWearsPants 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hitchens is very difficult to make out. His audio is awful.

  • @jamietherooster
    @jamietherooster 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    tik tok is a form of warfare

  • @ausforaus7617
    @ausforaus7617 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    同意

  • @Andrew-mv2qb
    @Andrew-mv2qb 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mikaila Peterson on CRT - m.th-cam.com/video/2Kg0q82mFzI/w-d-xo.html

  • @jayeme1483
    @jayeme1483 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I miss the beautiful lady .

  • @jamiekanrahchah3124
    @jamiekanrahchah3124 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    As always, you quacks root for your cheques.
    Ever hear of "what is good for the goose is good for the gander"?
    Try to embrace change, if you dare .

    • @scottwatrous7649
      @scottwatrous7649 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I hear you. Now hear this. One can indeed go from the frying pan into the fire.

  • @tc-fz5qn
    @tc-fz5qn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Typical couple of dinosaurs being thawed out of their time warped glory days of “empire”. Lifting 1.4b people out of abject poverty within 40 years without having to fire a single shot within and without its borders is of no significance to them. And they can talk of Christian values!!! The Chinese people are having the best time of their lives in their 5000 years of their history. In the years leading up to the advent of the pandemic early 2020, 130-140m Chinese travel the world as tourists every year. And everyone of them returned home happily after that. Surely this is not the behaviour of a repressed or oppressed people as unhappy with their government as these two dinosaurs would like you to believe. And if they also keep pushing the line that Taiwan and Hong Kong are not recognised as part of China then they’re revealing themselves to be even worse as that fact is well documented including the well known Shanghai Communique. The good news is I guess these dinosaurs are dying out slowly but surely and more realistic and honest folks are waking up to the truth.

    • @mikeoglen6848
      @mikeoglen6848 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That China will takeover the World?

    • @janewilkin1984
      @janewilkin1984 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They don't report these achievements on the BBC news, but what success for the Chinese people,

    • @shaughnfourie304
      @shaughnfourie304 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      YOU ARE A CHINESE TROLL

    • @tc-fz5qn
      @tc-fz5qn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@shaughnfourie304 . Its alright shaughn, we understand your inability for critical thinking and that's all you know what to say. Run along now before you miss your next episode of the latest rerun of "The Kardashians."

    • @henrysevern
      @henrysevern 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Culture disagreements of two theories of how countries are to operate and be governed.

  • @garymurtagh7047
    @garymurtagh7047 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ivermectin