To me, at my laptop with PC-speakers and sub for 30 bucks, lying in my bed........ it sounded like 1 2 3 4 were very similar, and sounded the best. And 5-6 had much lower volume and sounded much thinner.
To me Landr was the winner more balanced in the frequency range. Mixea sounded thin, mids scooped. I would encourage you sometime to give CloudBounce a try 👍
Thanks for these. Mixea sounds like it has a big EQ hole or phase issue somewhere, I would reject that one outright personally. Landr was a pleasant surprise though, definitely will look into that one. I have been using Ozone since version 3 and have become very accustomed to how it sounds, so I was not surprised to find I preferred the sound of Ozone in the blind test.
I know it’s weird with Mixea when listening to it next to all of the other masters but when i compared it with references from big artists, Mixea was the one that sounded like it fit in with those. If it wasn’t for that I was leaning toward Landr and you can’t really go wrong with Ozone. The great thing about Ozone is you can set it up manually not just with AI.
5 was the stand out for me right away, brought the low end out more than all the previous ones. The previous ones sounded too tinny for my liking and the bass wasn't as prominent.
That’s not what mastering is so I don’t think there is a free mastering service that does that. You may be able to find some AI thing that can do what you want. It’s not something that I would look up so I can’t help you with that.
It would matter if the limiter is crushing the track. If you’re just using the limiter to bring up the levels and maybe doing the tiniest amount of gain reduction then that won’t matter but leave at least 1db of headroom. Landr mastering recommends that you have the track at -6db before using their service.
I like 9 better too but 10 integrates with the audio lens which is cool. But if I’m not using audio lens then 9 is the way to go for me. I think they tried to make 10 even more fool proof.
I know. I have two more in the works right now. 1. Video just for plugins and software and the other video is for the cloud services. They will be released very soon. Thank you for watching. Keep creating! 👊👍
I was going to say the same thing. All of the others sounded very similar and that sounded like it was playing through cheap dollar store headphones. There was no girth to the sound. Kind of like it was trying to separate the instruments.
Mixea sounds terrible. Thin and easily fatiguing. Would translate to being able to be super loud but would probably be remembered as a mistake when put next to literally any of the others, including bandlab (side note, I often dig the bandlab master setting called either analog or vinyl to get some nice smooth yet full & punchy old school tape-saturation type of sonic rather than "standard" which is generally incredibly bland sounding)
I’ve recently started to get more into Studio One. If it’s a really simple project that I’m starting I’ll load up Tracktion still as I know it very well and can get things done quick in it. But most newer projects I’ve been going to Studio One lately. Typically for my plugin reviews I use Waveform still as I have a lot set up in it for those reviews. Both programs are very similar, I just want to do some videos on studio one soon so I’m getting used to it. But I will still be doing Waveform videos too.
Thx for that , i will check some of them. I do German Rap , and i think my sound needs to clean up to bring my message better to the World ❤ like i said , thank you very much and keep doing buddy ❤
With laptop speakers and cloth ears, they all sounded much of a muchness to me other than 5, which was quieter and a lot thinner and tinny sounding than the rest.
It must be the way that TH-cam squashes the audio because when listening to them here I think 5 was more full sounding. They are all decent options though.
Also, I broke down and bought Ozone Elements 10 because it was on sale for $30 and so far I am not impressed. Ozone 9 has way more options as starting points, but, and more importantly, you can adjust the various parameters.
I've never tried it so I can't comment on it but If it's the best for you then continue using Slates Mastering and you won't even need to worry about what programs and services people are talking about.
@@AudioTechTV Was only trying to make you aware. I did however try mixea after your video and I was satisfied. I enjoy Slate's Quality but I don't enjoy the cost.
![เปิดใจ "อาจารย์เบียร์ คนตื่นธรรม" อดีตเคยสุดทุกทาง ถ้าใช้หนี้หมดไปบวชแน่ l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IxeE0xVhy08/mqdefault.jpg)
Next check out everything you get with Landr Studio by clicking here th-cam.com/video/ejp53-UlHks/w-d-xo.html
To me, at my laptop with PC-speakers and sub for 30 bucks, lying in my bed........ it sounded like 1 2 3 4 were very similar, and sounded the best. And 5-6 had much lower volume and sounded much thinner.
What kind of microphone you use ?
To me Landr was the winner more balanced in the frequency range. Mixea sounded thin, mids scooped. I would encourage you sometime to give CloudBounce a try 👍
Yeh, I thought it was actually the worst of the bunch.
But you have to pay
Thanks for these. Mixea sounds like it has a big EQ hole or phase issue somewhere, I would reject that one outright personally. Landr was a pleasant surprise though, definitely will look into that one. I have been using Ozone since version 3 and have become very accustomed to how it sounds, so I was not surprised to find I preferred the sound of Ozone in the blind test.
I know it’s weird with Mixea when listening to it next to all of the other masters but when i compared it with references from big artists, Mixea was the one that sounded like it fit in with those.
If it wasn’t for that I was leaning toward Landr and you can’t really go wrong with Ozone. The great thing about Ozone is you can set it up manually not just with AI.
Adding reference track to Landr improves Mastering significantly, night and day compared to Ai Presets.
Adding a reference track? That's a thing you can do? That would save me weeks of work
Yes you can add reference track to landr. In my case it made huge difference.
Very helpful - Thanks for compiling and comparing these 👍
Think Landr took that one. As a longtime Ozone user was surprised how thin both standard and elements sounded.
Ozone’s strengths aren’t in the AI but using the individual modules manually make it an excellent purchase.
Most useful comparison video ever!
Did the fifth option "Mixea" destroy everything? Or are my studio monitors a fuc' shit? :) :)
My experience with distrokid has been fucshit...prob same your speakers and Mixea.
i like 3 and 4..sound clean
Agreed. 3 and 4 were my choices, too.
@@duaneman67 Mine too!
great video great delivery very informative thanks brother
So how does this work, do you open them as plugins inside of your DAW or do they operate completely independently?
Great vid, thanks bro. Google results suck comparing to the simple advice given here. You're a rockstah.
I like Mixea, but don't want to pay 100, right now. Might try some of the suggest ones in the video. Thanks.
Landr was crisp and well balanced in sound. mixea sounded thin and tinny, almost like there was some weird master reverb going on
5 was the stand out for me right away, brought the low end out more than all the previous ones. The previous ones sounded too tinny for my liking and the bass wasn't as prominent.
Is there a free one that's easy where u just enter or change the lyrics?
That’s not what mastering is so I don’t think there is a free mastering service that does that.
You may be able to find some AI thing that can do what you want. It’s not something that I would look up so I can’t help you with that.
I'm currently in the mastering phase and it's just not going my way hahaha!!! Thank u so much for this video :>>
4 option in mastering in band lab and i do... 😎 tape❤
I vote for # 4, it adds more body to the music, more robust and crisper presence, my humble opinion.
So when using one of the sites does it matter if I have a limiter on my track?
It would matter if the limiter is crushing the track. If you’re just using the limiter to bring up the levels and maybe doing the tiniest amount of gain reduction then that won’t matter but leave at least 1db of headroom. Landr mastering recommends that you have the track at -6db before using their service.
thank you for, very helpful video
Glad you enjoyed the video. Thank you for watching. Keep creating! 👊👍
sorry, I made a mistake on a previous post, which seems to have been removed, which suits me fine as it was not correct.
Was it the post about getting Elements 10? I can still see that one. Thank you for continuing to watch. Keep creating! 👊👍
@@AudioTechTV no, that one is legit. Definitely how I feel about 10 over 9. Cheers.
I like 9 better too but 10 integrates with the audio lens which is cool. But if I’m not using audio lens then 9 is the way to go for me. I think they tried to make 10 even more fool proof.
Should I have Mix Cube monitor for the mid range ?
We already need an update to this video with how fast these AI masters are changing and improving.
I know. I have two more in the works right now. 1. Video just for plugins and software and the other video is for the cloud services. They will be released very soon. Thank you for watching. Keep creating! 👊👍
Mixea seemed the thinest
Maybe that’s how it sounds through TH-cam’s compression. But here it actually seemed to be more full. Thank you for watching. Keep creating! 👊👍
I was going to say the same thing. All of the others sounded very similar and that sounded like it was playing through cheap dollar store headphones. There was no girth to the sound. Kind of like it was trying to separate the instruments.
was thinking the same as DJ and Terry .... weird
Mixea sounds terrible. Thin and easily fatiguing. Would translate to being able to be super loud but would probably be remembered as a mistake when put next to literally any of the others, including bandlab (side note, I often dig the bandlab master setting called either analog or vinyl to get some nice smooth yet full & punchy old school tape-saturation type of sonic rather than "standard" which is generally incredibly bland sounding)
I see you use studio one, wanted to know about when do go for studio one and when traction during your music production process?
I’ve recently started to get more into Studio One. If it’s a really simple project that I’m starting I’ll load up Tracktion still as I know it very well and can get things done quick in it. But most newer projects I’ve been going to Studio One lately.
Typically for my plugin reviews I use Waveform still as I have a lot set up in it for those reviews. Both programs are very similar, I just want to do some videos on studio one soon so I’m getting used to it. But I will still be doing Waveform videos too.
@@AudioTechTV Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
Thx for that , i will check some of them. I do German Rap , and i think my sound needs to clean up to bring my message better to the World ❤ like i said , thank you very much and keep doing buddy ❤
3,4 and 6 for me. 3 is what i would have chosen as winner
So which one is actually free without paying a dime?
Bandlab. Unlimited mastering and it's completely free.
Bandlab
Bandlab
I was actually curious if you were aware of White Sea Studio's new service? I'm very curious to see how it fares
I haven’t seen that one yet. I know there are some others out there. I may give them a try too.
With laptop speakers and cloth ears, they all sounded much of a muchness to me other than 5, which was quieter and a lot thinner and tinny sounding than the rest.
It must be the way that TH-cam squashes the audio because when listening to them here I think 5 was more full sounding. They are all decent options though.
Also, I broke down and bought Ozone Elements 10 because it was on sale for $30 and so far I am not impressed. Ozone 9 has way more options as starting points, but, and more importantly, you can adjust the various parameters.
You can adjust the same stuff I believe, just hit the top bar to get out of the AI analysis window so you see the same processing chain as Ozone 9?
only if I upgrade
@@omapots
No one talks about Slates Mastering, that is by far the best one.
I've never tried it so I can't comment on it but If it's the best for you then continue using Slates Mastering and you won't even need to worry about what programs and services people are talking about.
@@AudioTechTV Was only trying to make you aware. I did however try mixea after your video and I was satisfied. I enjoy Slate's Quality but I don't enjoy the cost.
after connected to my yamahas mos def 5
Mastered 5 sounds like trash
I agree...
The last 2 ain’t a good master sir!
Mahalo braddah that was awesome. I’m trying the landr free trial 😊
Glad you enjoyed the video. I hope you like Landr Studio. Thank you for watching. Keep creating! 👊👍
@@AudioTechTV I’m trying to figure it out now lol
I like 3 whatever it is, I paused it at 2:33... time to see what it was
Landr for the win
6 sounded the best to me
Mixea didn't do it for me. My least favorite. Landr or the Master dot Studio were my favorites
Num 4 sound the best
Landr instantly sounded differently..
Landr🎯
Goat
Landr is no longer unlimited. They nuked the distro to max 30 songs per month.
Landr sounds the best on my phone speakers
damn.. not even mix engineers are safe. AI is going to disrupt everything
Fraid so. We've got a tiger by it's tail.
Im recording music AI will despise 😂
AI mastering ? some sound engineers will loose their job....
Mixea the best
5 mixea 👎
u should not master this music. u should have areal singer first
mixea sounds like its off a burnt cd from the winMX era... izotope sounded the most natural (laptop speakers and sony mdr headphones)
OZONE v10 won
2-5