@@CarlosVermeerschSantana Ik this is a late response, but the documentary here is based off of Patagotitan, a new Titanosaur that was described back in 2017. This Titanosaur was estimated to have lived 101.62 million years ago. By 70 million years, it was already long gone and extinct.
@@alexthetitanosauremperor6904nope, it's and indeterminate Antarctic Titanosaur but in the documental Dinosaurs of Antarctica they are referred as Savannasaurus elliottorum
Lmfao, Titanosaurs never truly had these rock-like osteoderms on their backs like in Ark. That's highly inaccurate. The size, and shape is also inaccurate in Ark.
@@gronnmoltebaer 1) skull is shrink-wrapped 2) all motions are slo-mo: even eyelids blink in slo-mo 3) limb motions are jerky 4) walk cycle is non-fluent 5) hatching scene is utter nonsense (ever seen a bird or reptile hatch?) 6) limb posture is too wide even for a wide-gauge titanosaur 7) foot falls are clumsy and hard, when they should be soft. That's from a VERY quick glance. I don't even want to watch this in detail or slomo.
@@heinrichmallison4620 Also: 1. Not burying your eggs isn't a good plan if you're not brooding and protecting them. 2. Pretty generic sauropod shape for a group that has a pretty distinct anatomy. 3. A tiny bit/none osteoderms for animals of which it is known they had them. 4. Mammal-like playing behaviour. 5. This is getting nitpicky: Hatchlings just walking around in the open, enjoying the view, while there is an entire ecosystem of predators living of them. These things are comparable to sea turtles when it comes to getting eaten.
I dont know if this is a movie if it is i wpuld love to see this
AMAZING
AMAZING *preparing popcorns*
It’s so COOL
Looks great, but you got the nostrils wrong. A small, simple mistake, but I expect more from modern paleontological media lol.
Is that Patagotitan?
MrWanapon it is
MrWanapon Nope. It's the Antarctic Titanosaur.
It's and indeterminate Antarctic Titanosaur but in the documental Dinosaurs of Antarctica they are referred as Savannasaurus elliottorum
@@raptorex2459 okay...
Baby titan bruhhh :>
Nicccceeee
0:41 70 MILLIONS YEARS?
What's wrong with it?
@@CarlosVermeerschSantana inaccuracy. If this is in Argentina again, it would likely be 30 million years earlier.
@@SpinoDragonProductions Likely, not necessarily. Titanosaurs lived from 145 until 66 million years ago.
@@CarlosVermeerschSantana Ik this is a late response, but the documentary here is based off of Patagotitan, a new Titanosaur that was described back in 2017. This Titanosaur was estimated to have lived 101.62 million years ago. By 70 million years, it was already long gone and extinct.
@@SpinoDragonProductions I did not realize this documentary was about Patagotitan, then indeed the dating is off. Thanks for answering!
Dreadnoughtus or Patagotitan ?
Blue Robot Cat Patagonian.
Jay Shree Hari Nope. It's the Antarctic Titanosaur.
It literally says Titanosaur
That’s an Alamosaurus
Elipson Seven Nope. It's the Antarctic Titanosaur.
@@rhynchocyonpetersi no it’s patagotitan
@@alexthetitanosauremperor6904nope, it's and indeterminate Antarctic Titanosaur but in the documental Dinosaurs of Antarctica they are referred as Savannasaurus elliottorum
i think thats ether argentinosaur or patagotitan
CM94 Returns it's patagotitan
CM94 Returns Nope. It's the Antarctic Titanosaur.
Nhmla WILL YOU MOVE TO NEW YORK TO MEXICO CITY
titanosaurs should have rocks on them
edit: that dino is a leg of a brachiosaurus and a body and head of a diplodocus
You mean osteoderms 😂
ye
Lol ark
The real life titanosaur was as big as an ark brontosaurus but I heard some titanosaur are even bigger but idk
Lmfao, Titanosaurs never truly had these rock-like osteoderms on their backs like in Ark. That's highly inaccurate. The size, and shape is also inaccurate in Ark.
OH MY GOD!
EVERY SINGLE POSSIBLE mistake in the animation is in there. EVERY ONE!
Did they specifically aim for this?
My thoughts as well. Congrats to Dr. Currie-Rodgers though!
@@ScottHartman oh shit, real Scott?
Could you elaborate? :o
@@gronnmoltebaer
1) skull is shrink-wrapped
2) all motions are slo-mo: even eyelids blink in slo-mo
3) limb motions are jerky
4) walk cycle is non-fluent
5) hatching scene is utter nonsense (ever seen a bird or reptile hatch?)
6) limb posture is too wide even for a wide-gauge titanosaur
7) foot falls are clumsy and hard, when they should be soft.
That's from a VERY quick glance. I don't even want to watch this in detail or slomo.
@@heinrichmallison4620 Also:
1. Not burying your eggs isn't a good plan if you're not brooding and protecting them.
2. Pretty generic sauropod shape for a group that has a pretty distinct anatomy.
3. A tiny bit/none osteoderms for animals of which it is known they had them.
4. Mammal-like playing behaviour.
5. This is getting nitpicky: Hatchlings just walking around in the open, enjoying the view, while there is an entire ecosystem of predators living of them. These things are comparable to sea turtles when it comes to getting eaten.
Tisaonewsuzm
KingDeromeure