The Philosophy of Disney Movies | Rachel Jankovic
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ก.ย. 2024
- Rachel Jankovic breaks down the philosophy behind the idea you can "be whatever you want to be" and how to respond to it as a Christian.
Get Rachel's book "You Who" today.
canonpress.com...
Here's what people are saying:
"Are you a person? Do you breathe? If you answered yes to either of these questions, you should read this book as quickly as you can get your hands on it. Reading this book was like being given a cup of cold water on a hot day." --Summer Jaeger, Sheologians Blog & Podcast
"Rachel Jankovic says most Christian women are influenced more than they realize by prevailing existential self-love messages. In You Who? Why You Matter and How to Deal With It ... she identifies the un-Biblical philosophies of personhood and selfactualization that have seeped into the culture and church, fueling the widespread believe-in-yourself mantra, along with deceptions about abortion, feminism, and gender identity. Jankovic aims to define a Christian view of identity, one that puts to death the sinful self and receives new life in Christ.... I found grace spelled out in the pages, and a timely message for women and teenage girls" --Mary Jackson, World Magazine
"Rachel's contention is that we have no practical idea of what makes us who we are, because we have absorbed too much of the world and its philosophies. As we grow up we adopt titles of identities that have either been thrust on us or that we take on ourselves. "Carefree grrrrl," or "The Fashionista" or "The Nerd" might satisfy for the moment, but they are a lie." --Elizabeth Prata, The End Time blog
This video is brought to you by Canon Press.
Get Rachel's book "You Who" today.
canonpress.com/products/youwho/
In this day and age of Narcissism...this is so deeply intertwind in identities.
Almost every Disney movie has the same plot. Child has desires. Fearful (wise) parents say no. Child disobeys, experiences a little trouble, but ultimately overcomes, helping g the dumb parents undersrand that they were wrong and that their hero Child was right for disobeying and following their heart.
Brilliant.
A better more truth packed message in the short time to listen to this video than 95% of every message coming from the American Church pulpit on any Sunday of the year.
That was spot on and super articulate, wow.
This is America, people can be whatever or whoever they want.
So good!!!
Wish there was a "love" button instead of just a "like"! We need more spiritually grounded women like you to tear down the lies of feminism and false purpose! God bless you, Sister!
Whoa. More please.
Little children, let no one deceive you. He who practices righteousness is righteous, just as He is righteous.
very deep
Wow🙏🏼
Awesome message
well stated and articulated.
Amen. Thank you for stating this so clearly and beautiful.
This was some straight fire, good stuff.
This absolutely blew me away
Such good stuff! Keep preaching truth Rachel!!
Yes, good job.
Therefore, since we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses, let us also lay aside every weight, and sin which clings so closely, and let us run with endurance the race that is set before us,
Hebrews 12:1 - ESV
Thank you for this, we need more exposure of the darkness in worldly philosophy under the sunlight of God's Truth!
Excellent!
So beautifully said ❤️🙌
Thank you and bless you
Awesome.
This is spot on.
Excellent series of observations and overall message.
However, just to not distract, please, fix the spelling of "Christian" around 2:15.
Thank you for your explanation of existentialism! It always seemed so "squishy," but now I have at least the beginning of an understanding. This is excellent!
Bravo!
This woman is strikingly smart
Legit. I will buy a copy of this book, should be a good asset in helping my daughter navigate this ridiculous world we live in.
Amen ! We find our identity in Jesus 🙏🏻☝️✝️💜
Lol. The two tropes first mentioned-“follow your heart” and “you can be whatever you want to be” are two of the most pernicious little sayings we tend to use without even thinking about them. After I became reformed, I began to understand who I really am (i.e., what man really is) more and more and those thoughts changed dramatically. I now tell my kids “you can be whatever God gifted you to be.” And when my daughter came home from her aunt’s house with a beautiful little wall decoration she had painted that said “follow your heart” on it, I told her it was absolutely beautiful, but the “heart is deceitful above all else and desperately wicked” and she may want to change the phrase on her beautiful artwork. 😅
The communist torturers often said, 'There is no God, no hereafter, no punishment for evil. We can do what we wish'. I even heard one torturer say, 'I think God, in whom I don't believe, that I have lived to this hour so that I can express all the evil in my heart.' He expressed it in unbelievable brutality and inflicted torture on the prisoners: Richard Wrumbrand
Wow
Nice to see depth
When I read the Bible I realized Disney was super pagan the first domino for me was the portrayal of love. I can't believe I couldn't tell the difference between lust and love before I read the Bible because it seems obvious now.
I gave up on disney's crap about 20 years ago after realizing every "hero" became heroic by disobeying their parent. It simply wasn't something I wanted my children to learn. 😒
There's that. There's also that they declare infatuation to be 'true love'. The love of Christ is not such a thing as what Disney touts as 'love'.
I wonder how much of our culture's woes come from Disney's promotion of reckless indulgence and the general populace's acceptance of them.
Yes!!
Barbara Eccleston. That hadn’t ever crossed my mind but it is spot on. Thanks for sharing.
Good point! That popular song from Frozen says, “No right, no wrong, no rules for me, I’m free!” We didn’t do Disney but it slipped in through family/friends…until I found myself singing that one day with my toddler and realizing what I was saying! We take a much harder stance now.
For me, another big problem is the prevalence of magic and sorcery in most of the movies.
@@truthinlovemama to be fair, “Let it Go” is pretty much Elsa abandoning her responsibilities and as she is singing it, ice is literally destroying her kingdom. It’s a fun song, but it’s not supposed to be a prescription. The moral is that “finding yourself” at the expense of others is dangerous.
I was just having this conversation with some friends. At least someone gets it!
In some cases, and depending on who said it, follow your heart and you choose who you want to be is ok. Like when my mom said it when she was helping me deal with bullies as a kid. Or when she was advising me on a career/school/job path. We do have to be careful and judge these slogans in the context as well.
Really good thoughts! Thank you for sharing! I want to love Jesus more and be who he made me to be!
The heart so wicked & deceitful who could know it , Jeremiah KJV
We all have the potential to be the best sinners we can be. The world revels in that.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.-Romans 12:2
This is the root difference between self-centered and God centered.
We were made by the triune God, in His image and likeness, to know, love and serve Him in this world in order to be with Him in eternity.
Bedrock Catholic teaching..
Pax Christi.
It's not just philosophy Disney promotes, but also occultism/paganism!
Biggest peddlers of witchcraft in modern media!
Is that why Soren Kierkegaard is called the most anti-Christian Christian
Could you reconcile the fact that an image of Dostoyevksy was shown as an example of an existentialist whereas existentialism =/= Christianity but Dosteyevsky was Christian?
Dostoyevsky and Kierkegaard were great Christians too, they offered Christ as a solution to existential dilemmas. Sartre was really confused (he approved of communism and dictatorship), and he should not be equated with great thinkers as these two. The rest is plan and simple.
Jeremiah 17:9
The heart above all things is desperately deceitful and wicked
Sophists were the Greek philosophers who created the idea and philosophy of: 'that's you truth,' and the idea that you create your own morals. They were paid to entertain folks with fancy worded arguments about life.
Their creator of this branch of philosophy was Protagoras, where we get the word, 'protagonist' from.
The philosophy and the titled position of being a sophist is where we get our word, 'sophisticated' from.
A valuable assessment I'm not sure I've heard in these words before. I wonder if this also is where the propensity to re-interpret our actions as the things we wish them to be comes from. I see this in a particular type of person, they wish to be loving so they interpret their actions as loving, with no testing allowed to see if they actually are (either through choosing ignorance or justifying themselves through other people). These types often live an entirely delusional life where the reality they suppose themselves to be in exists with next to no possibility for self criticism. It is a life re-enforced through the well meaning, people pleasing, and goodwill of others that assumes their right intention. In such people I also often find a silent pact to never engage or tolerate self criticism, its the weak link they must choose to be blind to. I find these people often don't feel remorse or guilt since they are so used to re-interpreting their actions as good and are very difficult to correct; often they use "sorry", sometimes emotionally delivered, as a tool to get relationships functioning again, with zero remorse or knowledge of wrongdoing. The problem for such people is that someone outside themselves is upset or that their relationship with so and so is no longer operating, rather than that they have committed a wrong.
These types give themselves a pass on hypocrisy and then re-invent their hypocritical actions to match the desirable image of themselves they wish their actions to fulfill or justify - they would never see it as hypocrisy. These sorts of people are innately abusive and are utterly blind to their actions as such since they either appeal to their not knowing better (being raised that way) or to their ignorance, instead seeing their abuse as normal and, therefore, others interactions with it as the site of all problems. One's offense at their abuse is their own fault since the abuser is acting 'normal', is immune to self criticism, and sees their actions as virtuous and therefore there must be some deep rooted problem with the offended or hurt party. Gaslighting is also a frequent occurrence in such relationships. Somehow this all seems to be lurking around in the topic of this video - the idea of an relativistic created self free from criticism - and will make for some interesting examination!
Amazing. Don't forget, that such christian woman are not "produced" or "don't grow" in churches, that supports woman being an elder/pastor. "A woman that fears the Lord shall be praised" - Proverbs.
Eat drink and be merry for tomorrow we die - Proverbs.
@@stephanmarcus448 not in Proverbs....
First! Really happy to see a topic such as this. Will certainly be good.
I was literally just telling my husband how I hate how Disney movies teach little girls to follow their heart and disobey their parents. The sad truth is in the movies the heroine is always trying to save others and if women were following their hearts and disobeying their parents to become doctors or something of actual value, I might (might) let it slide but that is NEVER the case. Women always follow their heart and disobey their parents to be with some guy who is bad news!
I’ve watched a lot of Disney movies in the past and I’m trying to rack my brain around for some examples of what you are referring to where the heroine at the start of the film is disobeying their parents, The Little Mermaid? Moana?
@@stlouislord28 those are teo examples, Mulan is another.
Conversely, neither is essentialism, which is what this video is promoting, a particularly biblical worldview. Essentialism (i.e. platonic idealism) is a Greco-Roman philosophical disposition, not necessarily a Judeo-Christian idea present in the scriptures. While the ideal forms metaphysic is helpful and fairly aligned with biblical reasoning, there is no definitive prohibition against existentialism as a viable backdrop for a robust Christian metaphysic. Lest we forget, ultimately, both existence and essence flow from God our Creator in Whom both Essence and Existence subsist equally and eternally.
Essentialism also relates to Aristotles theory of purpose
Two years ago, I read Nancy Pearcey's LOVE THY BODY and she offers a wonderful in-depth look at this dualism. The essential self, or person, is on the top floor and the physical body, or human, is on the bottom floor. This split has been adopted into many Christian's worldview even though they dont use terms like "sacred/self split" or "two-story dualism." That's what makes identifying Disney movies as harmful usually gets you a response like "I grew up watching them and I turned out all right." There's a lack of critical thinking. Loved Nancy's book. Loved YOU WHO. Hoping more Christians start thinking about the ways in which worldly philosophers have influenced their own worldview.
Excellent! Thank you Rachel, very practical and totally correct
🤯
Sounds like the sinners prayer: i will make myself a child if God by saying a prayer and pushing myself to believe
Jesus does love us, but that does not mean he loves what we are doing. That key point is lost by many today. Thanks for this great video
So the independent fundamental baptists were right all along, just never put it so succinctly and intellectually.
Yes
somewhat, Frank Viola's "Pagan Christianity?" really hit home with how the modern church is literally just an offshoot of catholicism, pagan practices, and Greek sophists...the New Testament church would have never recognized a modern church. Good read, highly recommend it.
But the Gospel Coalition says all Disney movies point to Christ...or something like that.
I am a beloved child of my Father God .
That is enough for me.
I Trust in Jesus Christ and I Love
God with all my heart and all my mind and all my strength.
Say your prayers and go to church.
Respect your life and respect others.
I am grateful for the Grace of God .
It’s funny she condemns the Theory of Evolution even though within evolutionary biology their is an essentialism surrounding reproducing
"No one will be able to separated US from the love of God." The "US" are Christians, the people of God, the Body of Christ, the Church. Even existentialism, with its focus on the "Self," has folks interpret this passage in an individualistic way.
Wow. That is one of the dumbest think I've ever heard of a smart person saying.
"Existance precedes essence"
Obviously this is false. Anyone that has had a child would know this is false. Who was this fool? God have mercy on these people.
I know this video is very well intentioned but it absolutely reeks of someone who has little to no experience with the source material they are critiquing. Existentialism was a response (and a needed one) to the grand philosophical systems of the continental philosophy of its time. Kierkegaard wrote his philosophical works largely under veiled pseudonyms and his devotional work as himself. He deigned to call himself a Christian because he knew too many took this name lightly. He literally was obeying the third commandment. Is he perfect, of course not, but he was definitely against the grain of culture and the European cultural Christianity of his time. If more Christians took time to read Fear and Trembling and his work on confession instead of bowing at the name of the institutes we’d be better off.
Nice, now that's true Christian philosophy right there, thanks
Rachel you're the best!!!!! You're husband's a blessed man 💒
"The basic principle of existentialism is that existence precedes essence for human beings. Essence precedes existence for objects. Objects always have a definite purpose and this purpose is known prior to the creation of the object. On the other hand, humans are not born with a definite purpose."
This last sentence is why Existentialism is not Christian. God created humans for His glory; that is a definite purpose.
"We are the sum of our decisions and conscious choices." This end statement of existentialism is false because there are many outside influences that affect who we are. We didn't decide who are parents are, where we were born, if something horrible happened to us when we were young, and the list goes on.
I love how many people define themselves and their importance through their career "accomplishments" and then use it to feel superior over others who haven't "achieved". Thanks, capitalism.
Are you suggesting we remove the option of people choosing their own effort and business/personal decisions to solve the issue of pride?
You did a great presentation, tho I would argue that the kierkegaardian Existentialism is actually a biblical perspective on existence/selfhood. Just this summer, out of personal curiosity, I've read some great works from Sartre, Camus, Kierkegaard and Nietzsche, to inform myself on this subject. And, after reading and understanding Kierkegaard's idea of man being in despair (which he explicitly calls sin, that is, people are sinners before God) and his idea of man being defined by the biblical Creator God, I concluded that he basically just reiterated biblical truth, using different words. (of course many of his arguments are flawed because of his fallacies as a human being).
So that being said, I would argue that Existentialism is biblical (and quite interesting as well!).
You shall be as gods. Gen3:5
Every time I see Rachels adorable little face & hear her speak I swear I'm in love 😂
Great talk!
Canon is really blowing up right now! (pun slightly intended)
Got the app and almost everything I see & watch at the moment is through you guys. Great work, always!
For God's Glory 👐🏻
Luke married really well.
Amen. It is a great joy watching the old man die; experiencing God’s man emerge. Great presentation.
My goodness, how it happy father’s and mother’s be if you could have been transported back in time when young women were influenced by Oprah and Sex in the city. The 4 horsemen of disappointing young women from then to now.
Jesus doesn’t love that sin lol. So matter of fact obvs true
My mother : Marcus
comics are not for you (she put them in the garbage bin) read a book 😂 and here comes the shocker : I loved her for that! Reading saved me many times 🤗 the Bible is right : Knowledge and wisdom Leads you to God and therefore you get critical thinking and discernment! Comics & fantasy movies 😂 I consider them trash. Thanks Mum. 🥳
This sounds like someone who started and ended with Schaeffer's view of history.
"Existence precedes essence". This probably only represents Sartre, because Martin Heidegger, another existentialist, who taught Sartre, believed the opposite, essence precedes existence; simply read, Being and Time.
Trying to reduce existentialism to try to create a narrative to promote christianity is bad criticism. Makes us christians look bad.
You might want to rethink this line of reasoning. Firstly, an exception to the rule, does not invalidate the rule. The fact that Martin Heidegger did not hold to the notion of existence preceding essence, does not mean that it is not a key component of Existentialism. It is commonly known that this concept is the basic premise of Existensialist thinking. The fact that Heidegger disagreed does not change that. In fact, Heidegger himself rejected the label of Existensialist so he certainly should not be considered a typical Existentialist. Rachel is spot on in her assessment.
@@georgebaptistchurch8347 I disagree. Heck, Sartre would reject the label of existentialist as well.
Late modern thinkers simply reject any definition of man because they sought to avoid another WWII or Holocaust.
This is the background of their philosophy.
I exist because my father fertilized my mother's egg. No magic man in the sky was necessary for this to happen. Moreover, subjective identity is derived from personal memories. The moment I can't remember anything is the moment I forget who I am. Objective identity is derived from both other people's memories and documents like your birth certificate. I mention this only because if I loose my memories, but objective material is still intact, I can still regain my identity. If everyone I've ever known dies and all documents that prove my existence burn in some fire, I can still maintain my identity if I continue to remember who I am.
This is pretty basic stuff. I feel that Rachel is trying to mangle common sense to fit her religion.
Christian's are always 5 years behind, why is that?
Too bad I’m not smart enough to follow this. 😳🤣
Yes Luke made a wise choice looks like he got the last virtuous woman 💜😕☹️🤔😢
What a bunch of nonsense and strawman arguments.
Care to explain? How exactly is she making strawman arguments?
Excellent!
Excellent!