I love the gorgeous, functional, and inuitive visuals. Everything from the design of the waveforms, to the order of the UI elements-it's visual (which I like about Serum) but a bit more intuitive than Serum. I know there's many reasons we shouldn't compare the two as they're both great on their own. Thanks for the solid review!
I think maybe people are missing the point that this is an analogue modelled synth rather than your typical wave table synth like serum, From what I hear it sounds beautiful ,
@@liorsilverstein9802 It just means that the developers have used analogue modelling to create it. It is still fully digital but it emulates vintage hardware synths
@@RestorationsFOD yeah virtual analogue, like Virus TI, Waldorf and many other great developers... The sound depends entirely on the expertise and dsp techniques of each dev, although they can claim to be inspired by the same analog hardware. Our ears are the final judge, and frankly, I think Sylenth, Diva, Virus emu, and even Vital have the nicest sound.
@@liorsilverstein9802 Would be interesting to hear a blind test with the same patch programmed on all these. Might make for an interesting video for the future!
twin2 was like that. I think it's because the colorful filters are the most unique feature of this synth. I don't think FabFilterOne had filters in the middle though.
I like most of their catalog but this seems kind of boring. Would love to see a powerful synth with real character. Synth plugins tend to sound like plug ins.
@@JohnSmith-pn2vl I actually quite like using it. It's easier for me to see what's happening at all stages here rather than in something like Pigments, which I love. It doesn't have all of the bells and whistles of Pigments, Serum, etc., but I feel that what it does it does well.
Haven't focused too much on the impact of oversampling save for the terse comment on the CPU usage. But it would be interesting to see how the presets, with all of their complex modulations (including portamento, like here) would sound with and without the high quality mode engaged.
@@LoveMeBack I just happened to be on their website when they released it there and just downloaded it - haven't had it sent for review from FabFilter themselves.
I love the gorgeous, functional, and inuitive visuals. Everything from the design of the waveforms, to the order of the UI elements-it's visual (which I like about Serum) but a bit more intuitive than Serum. I know there's many reasons we shouldn't compare the two as they're both great on their own.
Thanks for the solid review!
Thanks! Indeed, the UI is a huge selling point here.
Fabfilfer is my favorite fx audio company, can't wait to try this beast
Same here! Love this synth.
I think maybe people are missing the point that this is an analogue modelled synth rather than your typical wave table synth like serum,
From what I hear it sounds beautiful ,
Yeah, I agree!
do you mean it comes with a hardware full of capacitors and diodes, that is analog, otherwise is in the digital range.
@@liorsilverstein9802
It just means that the developers have used analogue modelling to create it. It is still fully digital but it emulates vintage hardware synths
@@RestorationsFOD yeah virtual analogue, like Virus TI, Waldorf and many other great developers... The sound depends entirely on the expertise and dsp techniques of each dev, although they can claim to be inspired by the same analog hardware. Our ears are the final judge, and frankly, I think Sylenth, Diva, Virus emu, and even Vital have the nicest sound.
@@liorsilverstein9802 Would be interesting to hear a blind test with the same patch programmed on all these. Might make for an interesting video for the future!
fascinating design choice with the filter section in the center like that
Well, it is fabFILTER after all haha! Subconscious marketing!
twin2 was like that. I think it's because the colorful filters are the most unique feature of this synth. I don't think FabFilterOne had filters in the middle though.
finally some worthy soft synth for my old good Seaboard, nice! :)
🤩
I like most of their catalog but this seems kind of boring. Would love to see a powerful synth with real character. Synth plugins tend to sound like plug ins.
it'S absolute trash and a nightmare to use, whata dissapointment
@@JohnSmith-pn2vl I actually quite like using it. It's easier for me to see what's happening at all stages here rather than in something like Pigments, which I love. It doesn't have all of the bells and whistles of Pigments, Serum, etc., but I feel that what it does it does well.
opinions are cool 😀
Wow 🤩 very, very nice 👍👏👏👏
Thanks! Glad you enjoyed the video.
W video
does the presets from V02 come with it if you don't own V02?
Sadly, I don't know, as I own Twin 2. Might be worth sending fabfilter an inquiry.
you can always generate NFR license for older Fabfilter product, so you can get Twin 2 free if you buy Twin 3
@@TazzSmk Ah, yes, was not aware of that!
4:51 obvious case of aliasing in action (turning on "high quality"/oversampling would surely get rid of that)
Haven't focused too much on the impact of oversampling save for the terse comment on the CPU usage. But it would be interesting to see how the presets, with all of their complex modulations (including portamento, like here) would sound with and without the high quality mode engaged.
@@AndreiSora Thanks for the review!
@@KariKauree Glad you found it useful!
Proper audible aliasing is quite the rarity these days. Love how the twin3 can pull it off so effortlessly when in non-hq mode 😎
will there be more presets??? twin2 had so many
average pierre bourne fan 💀
@@_tsl ok virgin
@@_tsl ok so you hate Pierre? Leave the discord then
Probably not, I imagine this is more of a create-from-scratch kinda synth. And you can import the sounds form Twin 2 as well.
@@AndreiSora that’s terrible
New 🐐 on the block
Yep, GOAT synth contender here.
No embargo?
@@LoveMeBack I just happened to be on their website when they released it there and just downloaded it - haven't had it sent for review from FabFilter themselves.
@@AndreiSora Ok thanks. And Thanks for the review.
@@LoveMeBack Glad you enjoyed it!
Sounds bad. Like 2005....
I think it has its use in 2023 - the industry still seems to be riding the nostalgia wave and Twin 3 is good at 70s/80s/90s subtractive synthsesis.