ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
- This is a balancer that converts four distinct inputs into the same four outputs.
For example, it turns inputs of 1, 3, 5, 7 into outputs of 4, 4, 4, 4, respectively.
It is not a splitter designed to divide one input into four. I apologize for any confusion caused.
I hate the belts clipping, but on the final design it actually looks good, nice job
Can you make a buliding tutorial for the smalesst one ?
Super complex splitter.
The definition of form over function.
It looks cool.
Can you do 4 containers to 5 equal
That is a key ratio also.
I would like to see how you put the final one together that is really good
this is a great build. thanks for sharing! im thinking about trying it in my own factory!
Heya @브혼. Nice job done. I was in middle sorting my balancing problem. I nicely make it to 2.5 version. Than I saw your video. Well done! Do you think in soon time we can have tutorial how to do balancer? (for me just the last one) I will really appreciat that.
This is the greatest and most satisfying thing I ever saw in my fucking life
Have you made a blueprint for that last machine?
can u show how u built it?
오..........쪈다
8 / 2 = 4 / 2 = 2. И что сложного ?
Just because you can, doesn't mean you should
one of the most part of the game is "no using exploits" if you making belt in other belts its just shit and looks like shit and its not even right and pure.
Should have demonstrated the other 3 inputs, some people seem confused about the 4x4 part
I regret it and continue to do so. :(
Wtf
Is it possible to download this blueprint?
Please make a tutorial for these please thx
That belt clipping looks so... _naaaaughtyyyy._ The one with the conveyor-lift clipping looks plausible at least.
noob question: why is this better than using 3 splitters?
This is a balancer that converts four different inputs into the same four outputs. For example, when each input is 1, 3, 5, 7, the outputs become 4, 4, 4, 4, respectively. If it were just about dividing, then using three splitters would suffice.
I get the same result with just 3 splitters...
No you didn't, you just don't quite understand what this does.
That's, not the best, like, at all, expensive and over engineered, what you do, is take a splitter and split that in to 2, the split either of those again in to 2, then bam, its as easy as that!
That works for one line, but this is 4 lines to 4 lines.
So you have to do what you said 4 times and then merge it all together, that's why it is so dense.
@@justinwhite2725Please watch the video again… this is all 1 storage onto 1 belt split into 4 belts. The first person was correct in saying all of these are was over engineered. What you said “4 into 4” is literally 4 belts in a straight line.
@@TheSchnook You're missing the OTHER 3 inputs which are ALSO available just not demonstrated in the video.