Well, if they ever sell it, they’ll sell it for less, both because they don’t know how much they’re worth and stolen art is always sold for less than it’s worth, sometimes only for a tenth of it’s true value.
@@ghostnoodle9721 How exactly is it "dumb af baby logic"? The value of art is intrinsically linked to the amount the buyer believes it is worth, and it isn't at all a surprise that buyers would pay significantly more for one of these paintings were they to be recovered as a result of the piece's notoriety. How do you suggest we price art? The amount of time it takes to paint? lmfao you wouldn't happen to be a marxist by any chance? art is the one thing that gets labor theorists so heated
They are in for the long run... this is the YT millenials-flytrap of a (highly overvalued) media start-up. As mentioned: From the former BuzzFeed president. Even if they have endless money to burn now (I think they raised some millions (surely over 20) and are valued at idk, a 100 maybe, they will want a return at some point. (This means when they are big enough the adds will start, no worries.) You are right though: Great quality, nice vids... Paid by venture capital :)
@@mbolchunas Not many people want stolen art and those who do are going to want it at cheaper prices also they have to sell all the paintings which would take a while. So I quick 10 million dollars seems like the better offer.
I don't think it's necissarily lack of art appreciation, I imagine it's easier to sell on less famous peices since they're not so well known so it wouldn't blatantly obvious it was stolen when its hanging in someones house and possibly they could even think there would be less police searching than if they stole a world famous artwork
I literally just watched this same heist yesterday from RealLifeLore and thought to myself, "these two videos are so well done and complement each other so well"
5 ปีที่แล้ว +1
@@themarksman1313 I knew I've already seen it somewhere!
I was really invested in that animated retelling! I wanted to see what happened the next morning. Who found the security guards? When did they realize how bad the thievery and damages were?
meme youyou actually it’s because of her skill set, she’s clearly done the research and is able to maintain a good presence on camera, she clear and concise with dialogue and is able to make it intriguing in a natural way with use of tone. But I guess between you and I only one of us was actually watching this video, so I wouldn’t expect you to have caught any of that.
Do video about Steven Drake, who stole $318,000 from Namco to change into Canadian maple leafs and South African krugerrands for gold. ...Or what about Swedish mafia on Gizmodo?
It broke my heart hearing about how they CUT out ORIGINAL art pieces like that... thank god im still not Picasso status yet, I’d be absolutely devastated if those were mine 😢
I love how young people are so confident they’ll be wealthy, but zero idea of how to do it. Not to be rude, it’s just so unrealistically funny to me. Lol, “still not”.. what are you, like 17, maybe 19? I kind of doubt you’re at “paying my own rent” status as of yet, but hey, good on you for having ambitions. Not so much an aspirations, but ambition is good. I’m more plan/reality-oriented, but to each his own. Good luck, lyd.
mrjjman2010 I’m not saying I’ll be wealthy, I’m talking about skill overall my guy. I know full well that traditional art doesn’t sell like it used to, and I obviously don’t plan on it being my main source of income. But thanks for going completely out of your way to basically shit on someone’s goals despite it being completely unnecessary and then trying to mask it as “being realistic”.
@@mrjjman2010 Ah look at that. A miserable creature in it's natural habitat....The internet. How the heck do you know what level of money they are at? Plenty of young adults pay rent at 19 and live alone. You are not a realist nor a planner let me tell you that haha. Look at what you're saying. Let me guess, you had "dreams and a vision" but failed miserably and now you try and stomp on the hopes of others? Pfft please. Worry about your own life.
@@privatedonut2914 No sarcasm here, but I just wanted to say that I hope to get to the level of spitting such fire that you're at. You absolutely roasted the sad fellow, lol.
I saw that video a few weeks after seen Netflix 4 episode series about the robbery and still there is information mentioned in this 20 minutes video that was not in the 4 hours Netflix show, so good job guys, way to go!
No, it was to annoy the shit out of poor Rick to further reduce his chances of interfering with the heist, duh. Anyone who’s been around a trombone player knows that.
So you are telling me : this museumnis really easy to rob, and here are the most expensive paintings from there? Please tell this made them get cameras?
just the other day i came across this weird gizmo that displayed text on it. i tried to swipe and do apps and wifi on it but nothing happened! thankfully i found a wise enlightened boomer who explained to me about an old technology called "paper". idk what i would've done without their wisdom, i was stumped!
@@dragonskunkstudio7582 CCTV was invented in the 40s so it would be pretty reasonable to think that a building with a billion dollars in assets in the 90s would have a cctv set up. But I guess its because there a millennial.
olschool SouthieboyDST. Yeah probably. I doubt the most expensive pieces were ever sold for money because no one wants to buy paintings that are so well known. That’s also probably why they were never caught.
Insurance scheme. The Museum's board discovered that a number of the paintings, despite being obtained by Gardner over the years, were forgeries. The Paintings were never recovered because the thieves just destroyed them because they were worthless, hence why there's no indication they've been sold to anyone on the black or open market. The paintings they took, while valuable, pale in comparison to the more valuable paintings in the Museum that were not taken and likely were real. The paintings that were taken were one's no one would have questioned the authenticity of them at the time the museum was founded and so they were easy to insure. With pressure to renovate the museum and improve security, the collection at some point would have to be re appraised. Likely some or all of the board members had offered up the paintings as collateral more than once to secure finance and having such assets had them in good standings with the banks. The board new that if appraisers looked closely enough, they would find out the paintings were fakes and their reputation would be tarnished and the overall collection's value would plummet, devaluing the trustees assets overall and potentially leading to financial ruin. The thieves were hired by the board to steal the paintings, needing the guards to be witnesses, then dispose of them. The Trustees filed the insurance claim based on the alleged value of the works stolen, securing the capital needed to maintain the overall value of the museum and its holdings.
It's a Ponzi scheme for the rich. They can't keep all their billions in cash because it loses its value to inflation, so they look for stuff that holds its value or goes up in value over the decades. When they need cash, they can sell it. But there are so many billions out there that there aren't enough things for them to but to buy to protect all their wealth, so they get into a bidding war. Eventually, a $10M piece of art sells for $150M because some other rich sucker will pay $200M later on. The world hasn't run out of rich suckers yet, but the high end art market is going to collapse of it ever does.
Torrey Braman Yeah it’s a MOTION DETECTOR. You know what a MOTION DETECTOR does? It DETECTS MOTION. It doesn’t capture light because it isn’t a CAMERA.
@Foxtron Delta पढ़ चुका हूं, समझदार।Now if you can stop being presumptive and comply to watch a video on DB Cooper then you'll be making a 'lazy' man happy.
Please ignore the hate comments about her voice and her appearance, her voice is fine, she looks good too, but I gotta agree the animations are wayy too slow.
00:09 Motion Detectors have no Footage... they are Motion detectors? 4:47 "motion detector types a message" Now I am convinced you have no clue how these sensors work
“A motion detector with no footage on it,” You are correct. The motion detectors did not have footage on it... BECAUSE ITS A MOTION DETECTOR, NOT A CAMERA. The camera wouldn’t have footage on it anyway because it’s stored on a DVR or NVR, but I’m not concerned about that.
Everyone commenting saying they didn't get any ads. You must have a good ad blocker or been lucky as I got 14 ads and one was 23 minutes and I couldn't skip it.
The Daytona that was parked in the front of the Isabella museum at 12:49am was there for 5 minutes or less. The car drove off. When the 2 fake police enter thru the employee entrance the fake cops stated that they had some kind of arrest warrant for one of the guards. The story conflict because when upon entering the museum the fake cops stated this is a robbing the place. In the 81 minutes of the fingering the place it my theory is that when the second frame hit the floor on top of the 1st frame that was on the floor the 2 robbers were were afraid that someone heard them and they stopped for 20 minutes. The sensor went blank for 20 minutes without any movement in my opinion. The process after the 20 minutes they got back to work. Also the blue room on where a painting went missing. On the video surveillance there was activity but I doubt the 2 took any pictures from the blue room..The person of interest was not mentioned in this video I think. I think some but not all the painting would be returned. I wishing could see the surveillance video of the employee entrance and the lobby during the robbery.
Wow I really hate hearing about this. If at least they were sold to some rich ass of an art colector, they're being taken care of. But they might just be gone forever due to rot, water damage, etc ;(
Just doesn't make sense though. If the will somehow prohibited security cameras because that would be considered a change, how could there be motion detectors?
I live in Boston and I went to that museum two days ago. It was really sad and interesting to see the empty frames hung on the wall.
Ranger Ruby us boston guys we ain’t too bad
I visited Boston last week it was a nice museum
DARIEL RAMOS literally nobody cares besides a slob like you. I’ve never even been to Boston. Chill and enjoy a joke sometimes.
DARIEL RAMOS Your*
The price of art is so arbitrary that if the paintings ever reemerge they might be worth more than $1 Billion
Well, if they ever sell it, they’ll sell it for less, both because they don’t know how much they’re worth and stolen art is always sold for less than it’s worth, sometimes only for a tenth of it’s true value.
Yea, but these damn capitalists are going to argue "Its worth whatever is paid" which is dumb af baby logic
High end art is a Ponzi scheme for the uber-wealthy.
Clearly the thieves are investing in the paintings until the market value breaks a billion.
@@ghostnoodle9721 How exactly is it "dumb af baby logic"? The value of art is intrinsically linked to the amount the buyer believes it is worth, and it isn't at all a surprise that buyers would pay significantly more for one of these paintings were they to be recovered as a result of the piece's notoriety. How do you suggest we price art? The amount of time it takes to paint? lmfao you wouldn't happen to be a marxist by any chance? art is the one thing that gets labor theorists so heated
How does Cheddar produce such high quality videos without a single ad? Man, I love this channel!
They actually care about quality and not like some channels *cough* BuzzFeed *cough*
They are in for the long run... this is the YT millenials-flytrap of a (highly overvalued) media start-up. As mentioned: From the former BuzzFeed president. Even if they have endless money to burn now (I think they raised some millions (surely over 20) and are valued at idk, a 100 maybe, they will want a return at some point. (This means when they are big enough the adds will start, no worries.) You are right though: Great quality, nice vids... Paid by venture capital :)
@ForgottenOnes no idea of this, but hope they maintain their creative freedom
Money
They make the script so damn boring, that’s how.
>Be robber
>Want to sell paintings for money
>Cut out paintings with knife
What I'm about to do is called a progamer move
The cutting part got me so mad even though im not an art connoisseur
@@asilentvoice1380 same, I'm just a history nerd and it pisses me off
Bruh, I'm not even painter, curator or anything.
But that makes me screaming.
The man played GTA Online before Rockstar even existed
I think we need to appreciate how cheddar doesn’t have any ads yet extremely high quality content
they should get ads
They're offering $10 mill for $500 mill worth of art? Lol
mbolchunas if someone stole your $40k car and someone got it back are you gonna give them $20k or $1000 reward
@@ghettojendric moron the point is that no one is going to give it back for a $1000...
Rip never getting that back
@@mbolchunas Not many people want stolen art and those who do are going to want it at cheaper prices also they have to sell all the paintings which would take a while. So I quick 10 million dollars seems like the better offer.
Sounds like a "steal" of a deal, lol.
"a motion detector with no footage"
...
I don't think it's necissarily lack of art appreciation, I imagine it's easier to sell on less famous peices since they're not so well known so it wouldn't blatantly obvious it was stolen when its hanging in someones house and possibly they could even think there would be less police searching than if they stole a world famous artwork
This art heist in particular just makes me mad. Like two buffoons with no art appreciation steal the *ONLY* Rembrandt seascape
Calm yourself.
Force Fuck you, a masterpiece was brutalized and could’ve been destroyed
Sleve McDichael lol screw it sell it then spend it on anything
@@slevemcdichael5274 Calm down kid. It was 30 years ago. No reason to go around attacking people now for not caring.
machina188 It doesn’t matter if it was 30 years ago, a lot of history was lost because of money hungry criminals.
What if the robbers weren’t taking the expensive ones because they were looking for only certain ones 🤔🤔
This is actually a legitimate theory that investigators consider a possibility. Stealing the brass eagle is the biggest evidence for it.
Or they just took whatever they liked, "Oh that's a nice one! Lets take that!"
That’s what I was immediately thinking, maybe they were just a couple freelancers doing it for some rich dudes collection
Scooped selling stolen art is risky and you probably wouldn’t get much unless you already had someone lined up to buy it
TechnoCube
Yup. The safest thing to do would be to display it instead of trying to sell it. But what good would expensive art be if you can’t sell it?
I have seen so many videos about this heist, but it never gets uninteresting
I literally just watched this same heist yesterday from RealLifeLore and thought to myself, "these two videos are so well done and complement each other so well"
@@themarksman1313 I knew I've already seen it somewhere!
@@themarksman1313 I recommend seeing the one made by Buzzfeed Unsolved, very deep and straight to the point
Still to this day the museum offers money if you have some kinda information on the missing piece
I don't know but this seems like a pretty good video teaching how to steal a painting
RandomMexican(Juan) who’s down to do it ?
@@azpect7058 well have any plans for September 20?
@Grace La That's a possibility
RandomMexican(Juan) bet let’s do it
@@azpect7058 well fist we need to make this inclusive I'll get a Chinese a black guy what ya bringing
I was really invested in that animated retelling! I wanted to see what happened the next morning. Who found the security guards? When did they realize how bad the thievery and damages were?
She's deff my fav Cheddar presenter. She's by far the most natural on camera
What is her name
meme youyou actually it’s because of her skill set, she’s clearly done the research and is able to maintain a good presence on camera, she clear and concise with dialogue and is able to make it intriguing in a natural way with use of tone. But I guess between you and I only one of us was actually watching this video, so I wouldn’t expect you to have caught any of that.
@@MateoQuixote Ya dude I don't agree with you to the syllables.I want to know her name!!!!
From the thumbnail it looks like it was John Lennon and Paul McCartney
And to think they weren't recognized because of the moustaches 😔
Do video about Steven Drake, who stole $318,000 from Namco to change into Canadian maple leafs and South African krugerrands for gold.
...Or what about Swedish mafia on Gizmodo?
Now that’s just stupid, I bet the Board of Directors feels like a complete and total doofus for not updating the security.
It broke my heart hearing about how they CUT out ORIGINAL art pieces like that... thank god im still not Picasso status yet, I’d be absolutely devastated if those were mine 😢
I love how young people are so confident they’ll be wealthy, but zero idea of how to do it. Not to be rude, it’s just so unrealistically funny to me. Lol, “still not”.. what are you, like 17, maybe 19? I kind of doubt you’re at “paying my own rent” status as of yet, but hey, good on you for having ambitions. Not so much an aspirations, but ambition is good. I’m more plan/reality-oriented, but to each his own. Good luck, lyd.
mrjjman2010 I’m not saying I’ll be wealthy, I’m talking about skill overall my guy. I know full well that traditional art doesn’t sell like it used to, and I obviously don’t plan on it being my main source of income. But thanks for going completely out of your way to basically shit on someone’s goals despite it being completely unnecessary and then trying to mask it as “being realistic”.
@@mrjjman2010 Ah look at that. A miserable creature in it's natural habitat....The internet. How the heck do you know what level of money they are at? Plenty of young adults pay rent at 19 and live alone. You are not a realist nor a planner let me tell you that haha. Look at what you're saying. Let me guess, you had "dreams and a vision" but failed miserably and now you try and stomp on the hopes of others? Pfft please. Worry about your own life.
@@privatedonut2914 No sarcasm here, but I just wanted to say that I hope to get to the level of spitting such fire that you're at. You absolutely roasted the sad fellow, lol.
Picasso sucked so bad his last years
I saw that video a few weeks after seen Netflix 4 episode series about the robbery and still there is information mentioned in this 20 minutes video that was not in the 4 hours Netflix show, so good job guys, way to go!
I think it was the new security guy who was in the inside. The trombone was a signal to tell the other guys that everything was alright.
I'm sure he got a ton of "questions" from the police and museum
No, it was to annoy the shit out of poor Rick to further reduce his chances of interfering with the heist, duh. Anyone who’s been around a trombone player knows that.
So you are telling me : this museumnis really easy to rob, and here are the most expensive paintings from there?
Please tell this made them get cameras?
Robbers be like:
*Robbing Banks?* Nah
*Robbing Art Masterpieces?* Perfection 👌
They're men of culture.
@VintageToiletsRock
Figuratively and literally.
And then u got me robbin dunkin donuts
Actually they robbed banks read the book art of the heist my grandfather was apart of it
@@VintageToiletsRock I doubt that.
Motion detectors dont take videos unless they are motion activated cameras
I was saying "motion detectors with no footage?" what? I highly suspect this was written by a millennial who expects everything to be a smart device.
just the other day i came across this weird gizmo that displayed text on it. i tried to swipe and do apps and wifi on it but nothing happened! thankfully i found a wise enlightened boomer who explained to me about an old technology called "paper". idk what i would've done without their wisdom, i was stumped!
But there was no motion sensed
@@dragonskunkstudio7582 CCTV was invented in the 40s so it would be pretty reasonable to think that a building with a billion dollars in assets in the 90s would have a cctv set up. But I guess its because there a millennial.
@@zzzlucid_dreams7560 Exactly!
This was by FAR my favorite Cheddar video. Thanks so much guys and gals! xD
You know what this means... treasure hunt time!
Sooooo... You're telling me the museum is STILL with the same kind of security. Riiiiiiight..
plus u also know the good stuff is on 3rd floor
if it was anyone on the inside it would be the trombone boy
You'd think they would have at least figured out what they were going to steal before they got there.
It wouldnt have been hard for a dude in the know to take a tour and report back which to take, eh? :)
olschool SouthieboyDST.
Yeah probably. I doubt the most expensive pieces were ever sold for money because no one wants to buy paintings that are so well known. That’s also probably why they were never caught.
Definitely an intriguing story. With the paintings still MIA. Thanks
@Foxtron Delta , hello.
Maybe they were just nice and left the really good stuff for people to see
😑
my gahd this already interesting but the adorable sleek animation makes it even better!
Insurance scheme. The Museum's board discovered that a number of the paintings, despite being obtained by Gardner over the years, were forgeries. The Paintings were never recovered because the thieves just destroyed them because they were worthless, hence why there's no indication they've been sold to anyone on the black or open market. The paintings they took, while valuable, pale in comparison to the more valuable paintings in the Museum that were not taken and likely were real. The paintings that were taken were one's no one would have questioned the authenticity of them at the time the museum was founded and so they were easy to insure. With pressure to renovate the museum and improve security, the collection at some point would have to be re appraised. Likely some or all of the board members had offered up the paintings as collateral more than once to secure finance and having such assets had them in good standings with the banks. The board new that if appraisers looked closely enough, they would find out the paintings were fakes and their reputation would be tarnished and the overall collection's value would plummet, devaluing the trustees assets overall and potentially leading to financial ruin. The thieves were hired by the board to steal the paintings, needing the guards to be witnesses, then dispose of them. The Trustees filed the insurance claim based on the alleged value of the works stolen, securing the capital needed to maintain the overall value of the museum and its holdings.
We all know a Rick in our lives
The Securitas depot robbery is something I'd love to see covered if you haven't already!
I’m from boston and been to this museum multiple times as a child. I’ve always noticed the empty frames. It’s really sad.
Holy Jesus he’s so stoned
Tielormus - Builder/Gamer he’s also a cartoon
I should study but instead I watch videos about stolen paintings
Okay someone please tell me why are these paintings so expensive?
It's a Ponzi scheme for the rich. They can't keep all their billions in cash because it loses its value to inflation, so they look for stuff that holds its value or goes up in value over the decades. When they need cash, they can sell it. But there are so many billions out there that there aren't enough things for them to but to buy to protect all their wealth, so they get into a bidding war. Eventually, a $10M piece of art sells for $150M because some other rich sucker will pay $200M later on. The world hasn't run out of rich suckers yet, but the high end art market is going to collapse of it ever does.
Well they are extremely rare examples of an artist’s line of work, old as hell, and who wouldn’t want a Rembrandt or Van Gogh? + high markup
Where's the original voiceover? Miss him!
A lot of people were complaining about his face so he probably left.
He's still in the cheder team.
Man this story is amazing!
*”Ninjas tiptoeing on thick carpet make more noise than you!”*
Robber: *Cutting painting*
Me: *Screeching*
Why is crime so interesting?
Motion detector with no footage?
Torrey Braman
Yeah it’s a MOTION DETECTOR.
You know what a MOTION DETECTOR does? It DETECTS MOTION. It doesn’t capture light because it isn’t a CAMERA.
An episode on the Blekingegade gang could be very interesting
Going off the thumbnail, the Beatles are now art thieves lol
I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks John did it
I'd like to watch a video about DB Cooper please.
@Foxtron Delta पढ़ चुका हूं, समझदार।Now if you can stop being presumptive and comply to watch a video on DB Cooper then you'll be making a 'lazy' man happy.
Have you tried the search bar instead of the comment section?
@@clort123 No shit! How do you do that again?
I've been there. The museum was beautiful but had a sad feel to it and there was a lot of extra security.
It’s Matt Watson and Ryan Magee with fake mustaches.
God damnit Rick
Ask Raymond Reddington he probably knows a guy 😅
I actually remember this! Our tv acted weird a couple times, nothing worked. All we could do was watch this station!
The "Last Seen" podcast is a good deep dive into this entire debacle.
Please ignore the hate comments about her voice and her appearance, her voice is fine, she looks good too, but I gotta agree the animations are wayy too slow.
Most of the ppl that disliked this probably stole the vault or got annoyed by this ad
I meant disliked the video
Stay tuned. They will turn up in an episode of PBS's "Antiques Road Show"
those things are destroyed
00:09 Motion Detectors have no Footage... they are Motion detectors?
4:47 "motion detector types a message" Now I am convinced you have no clue how these sensors work
My grandpa was one of the people who could've possibly done this, him and Myles Connors were good friends he's in the book as Osby DePreist
“A motion detector with no footage on it,” You are correct. The motion detectors did not have footage on it... BECAUSE ITS A MOTION DETECTOR, NOT A CAMERA. The camera wouldn’t have footage on it anyway because it’s stored on a DVR or NVR, but I’m not concerned about that.
This just seems like the Diamond Casino Heist.
Compliance to law enforcement is never a mistake... Recent events should hold my argument
This is why my one of the places I worked are security company would call every hour
Oh wow, a much prettier Gina Lenetti. Fantastic.
I was interested, then I realized buzzfeed unsolved did a video on the same case
Motion detectors never have footage...
The way he put the mustache on lol
Maybe do a vid about a guy who stole Poland's only Monet
Everyone commenting saying they didn't get any ads. You must have a good ad blocker or been lucky as I got 14 ads and one was 23 minutes and I couldn't skip it.
You should check the greatest conman in Portugal and its colonies history - Alves dos Reis
Can you please add written metric measurements next to the Imperial units? Thanks.
The guys on the thumbnail looked like John and Paul on the Sgt. Pepper's album!
What do you do with stolen art? How can you show it off if it's stolen?
Awesome video!
Mocking victims of crime is pretty low.
Why is this an ad? Anyone else?
So you're telling me the IRA could steal 13 paintings, but couldnt steal 6 counties 🤔
I know next to nothing about art and even i cringe at the thought of cutting those canvases like that
This is some real shit to watch while you’re high.
A crime, against art.
The Daytona that was parked in the front of the Isabella museum at 12:49am was there for 5 minutes or less. The car drove off. When the 2 fake police enter thru the employee entrance the fake cops stated that they had some kind of arrest warrant for one of the guards. The story conflict because when upon entering the museum the fake cops stated this is a robbing the place. In the 81 minutes of the fingering the place it my theory is that when the second frame hit the floor on top of the 1st frame that was on the floor the 2 robbers were were afraid that someone heard them and they stopped for 20 minutes. The sensor went blank for 20 minutes without any movement in my opinion. The process after the 20 minutes they got back to work. Also the blue room on where a painting went missing. On the video surveillance there was activity but I doubt the 2 took any pictures from the blue room..The person of interest was not mentioned in this video I think. I think some but not all the painting would be returned. I wishing could see the surveillance video of the employee entrance and the lobby during the robbery.
All of these could have been avoided if Rick just called the police station and asked for confirmation from them.
Happy 4th cheddar
Wow I really hate hearing about this. If at least they were sold to some rich ass of an art colector, they're being taken care of. But they might just be gone forever due to rot, water damage, etc ;(
Usually these videos suck, but this is cool
The robbers were from the future. They stole these pictures because the robbery makes them extremely valuable in the future
Robbers version of Miranda rights lol! Love the animation
Everything was fine until she said "a motion detector with no footage"... That's not how a motion detector works
My question is: did the two security guards give a drawing description of the “cops” ????? That could have been a HUGE step as to who do it
She’s pretty.
What about the city of Philadelphia stealing the Barnes collection? There’s already a documentary about it, but it was still a massive heist.
The narrator mispronounces “Galilee” at 5:59. The accent is on the first syllable.
Just doesn't make sense though. If the will somehow prohibited security cameras because that would be considered a change, how could there be motion detectors?
Stop it with your stupid ads and fake comments already. It's getting on my nerves
This shouldn't be an Ad.
17 Minute ad?
I love this vid, so interesting
The flag eagle is weird... if Colombo has thought me anything: something bigger is going on
Just because they had fake badges doesnt mean it couldnt of been a crooked cop