My Father and I back in the 1970's built rollover two way plow's up to 10 bottom, 20 inch cut per bottom plow's pulled behind a tool carrier that could be pulled behind draw bar tractor's. Some of the plow's had swing down packer hitch's to kill two bird's with one pass. Plow's had hydraulic reset's for Rocky ground and could be towed down the road backward's in the half rolled position by a truck at highway speed's.
To reply to some questions as to why, in very wet conditions these crawler type tractor have no grip, just sliding on top of greasy surface. By ploughing in front, one track can ride in the furrow which is drier and provides traction. Not much good for compaction, but you get your field ploughed. A comment was made on how this kills the tractor, which is of course utter nonsense.
downside is that drivers can only work short hours due to the neck strain this rig induces....... look out the front; look out the back; look front; back; front.............. it's called a 'Chiropractors' Tractor'
roy hoco Not really - the tractor’s running on the unploughed land, so you’d be working the ground before the plough, which in these wet conditions would mean zero traction, not to mention being pointless.
Jay Bird when you have short fields a big plough would leave a lot of surface unplowed because its long,for example you have a 20 ft long plough and a 200 ft field.If you drop the plough when your last furrow enters the filed you have that diference between your first and last furrow unplowed.This is a lot better,or if you want a one big plough then there is the "smart plough" that drops furrows in the same line one after another as they enter the field
It's about the weight balance. Why use 8 furrow semi mounted plough and add a couple of tonne of weights to the tractor. I would guess the reason that they are using 8 and not 10 furrow is down to the soil as it does look like heavy soil to me and rather sticky too.
It just looks plumb wrong!, but 3 furs out front as opposed to the deadweight counterballast needed to hang 8 furs off the back is probably better, even if harder to manouver through a gateway.
Am I the only one who doesn't see any actual advantage to this? And why do you people use reversible plows? Double the number of parts for almost zero advantage. One semi-mounted 8 furrow (or more, given the available horsepower) plow would take half as much time to hook or unhook and save on a bunch of duplicated components besides coming with a radically lower price tag. Since it's on tracks, traction shouldn't be a problem that's significant enough to justify any of this. What's the gain? Not saying there isn't one, but it sure isn't obvious.
Tracks of the rubber type do not provide greater traction in wet conditions. The greater spread of weight is great for lowering compaction issues, but actually make the tractor just sit there and spin in a way tyred tractor would, except sooner as they do not cut through the greasy wet layer on top to get to a drier grippier layer underneath. Reversible ploughs are more expensive as you buy double the components. But the wearing parts do half the work, so that cancels out that initial higher cost. Mainly though the advantage is that you cover a field from one side right across to the other. There is no need to try and match your work and there are no ridges or troughs like you get when you throw furrows together at the start and a gulley where you end with furrows being thrown away from each other. Those problems take some work to eradicate with following equipment. This is why you rarely see a conventional plough working these days, at least in Europe.
@@alexveldhuis6004 the weight transfer makes some sense, although the design already has a substantial front bias, at least it appears that way. The reverdible plows though... Still wondering why the equivalent of four plows and not seeing a significant advantage.. It's no big deal to minimize the dead furrow. Fill in last year's dead furrow when setting out what we call a "land" in North America and I've even used the plow to partly backfill the dead furrow anyway. Set out the width of the lands to optimize the headland travel distance against the need to make excessively sharp turns. With modern automated steering, I would think the argument for the reversible idea is weaker still. Maybe the advantage is greater when plowing a lot of sod ?? Or hillsides where it might make contour plowing simpler. Maybe those two factors are the biggest factors. In Canada and the US, there's no longer a lot of mouldboard plowing anyway, but in the old days, we just added more horsepower and more plow bottoms. Even back in those days, very few used mounted plows. Mostly semi-mounted for anything up to about 7 furrows and then some trail plows once into the big stuff.
Nice machine 👍🤠🤠🙂👍👍🙂
My Father and I back in the 1970's built rollover two way plow's up to 10 bottom, 20 inch cut per bottom plow's pulled behind a tool carrier that could be pulled behind draw bar tractor's. Some of the plow's had swing down packer hitch's to kill two bird's with one pass. Plow's had hydraulic reset's for Rocky ground and could be towed down the road backward's in the half rolled position by a truck at highway speed's.
Is there an advantage to doing it this way?.
What's the advantage of the front mount?
Amazing work, my dear friend 🤝💖👀🥇🏆
To reply to some questions as to why, in very wet conditions these crawler type tractor have no grip, just sliding on top of greasy surface. By ploughing in front, one track can ride in the furrow which is drier and provides traction. Not much good for compaction, but you get your field ploughed. A comment was made on how this kills the tractor, which is of course utter nonsense.
In the U.S., theses are the days of no till. In most farms, plowing is seldom done.
Great great work 👀👍💖🤝
Nice video, very cool!!
Why not just pull an eight bottom?
Now I'm going to have to try this....................in farming simulator 😁👌
Same haha
@@mitchellwibe4661 oo
downside is that drivers can only work short hours due to the neck strain this rig induces....... look out the front; look out the back; look front; back; front.............. it's called a 'Chiropractors' Tractor'
excelent...👍👍👍
Parabéns força muito em distribuída sérvio muito otimo
Is ke price Kaia ha Bhai
great but would a turn plow in front and a harrow in back work better - 2 tasks in one pass
roy hoco Not really - the tractor’s running on the unploughed land, so you’d be working the ground before the plough, which in these wet conditions would mean zero traction, not to mention being pointless.
@@jamesblade6684 ya actually you can do that. there are videos on TH-cam of the very thing you say can't be done who's an idiot now
J.D. Stuart
Obviously you are. Point me to a video where a tractor is ploughing out front and pulling a power harrow.
@@jamesblade6684 you can operate a keyboard obviously just type it in yourself and a video will pop up dillhole
@@jamesblade6684 at least do a small amount of research before trying to be smartass because if you're wrong you just come out being an ass
i like it never seen front ploughing before though
I don't understand the benefits of having a little plow in the front and a little plow in the back vs one big plow in the back
Jay Bird this is a better combination for small fields
Jay Bird when you have short fields a big plough would leave a lot of surface unplowed because its long,for example you have a 20 ft long plough and a 200 ft field.If you drop the plough when your last furrow enters the filed you have that diference between your first and last furrow unplowed.This is a lot better,or if you want a one big plough then there is the "smart plough" that drops furrows in the same line one after another as they enter the field
try: balance front and rear of the tractor for better traction
Jay Bird.
.....
cmon guys he just like it big :D
Bona makinaria
🎗️✌️
Shouldn't that tractor pull a 10 bottom plow? here they are pushing 3 & pulling 5
It's about the weight balance. Why use 8 furrow semi mounted plough and add a couple of tonne of weights to the tractor. I would guess the reason that they are using 8 and not 10 furrow is down to the soil as it does look like heavy soil to me and rather sticky too.
Another benefit of push-pull plowing is that the front plow creates a dry furrow that the tractor can run in directly behind. Very handy for wet land
Nice plowing!
why??
It just looks plumb wrong!,
but 3 furs out front as opposed to the deadweight counterballast needed to hang 8 furs off the back is probably better, even if harder to manouver through a gateway.
Why doesn’t it have the European warning signs?
А если ещё и по бокам по навеске подцепить?
Only Deere can do this ,,,, world's best tracter,, front plowing amazing
County Tractors did push/pull ploughing 40 years ago
Should not be ploughing in such wet conditions. The best way to ruin soil structure, your land and possibly your future in farming.
I noticed that in many of the European videos.
Jon Deere King
Sympa la Naud devant
Moldova György: "Tudom én, tudom hogy mit akarnak! A tökömre akasszak egy viharlámpát hogy éjjel is dolgozhassak!"
Mooi !
Am I the only one who doesn't see any actual advantage to this? And why do you people use reversible plows? Double the number of parts for almost zero advantage. One semi-mounted 8 furrow (or more, given the available horsepower) plow would take half as much time to hook or unhook and save on a bunch of duplicated components besides coming with a radically lower price tag. Since it's on tracks, traction shouldn't be a problem that's significant enough to justify any of this. What's the gain? Not saying there isn't one, but it sure isn't obvious.
Tracks of the rubber type do not provide greater traction in wet conditions. The greater spread of weight is great for lowering compaction issues, but actually make the tractor just sit there and spin in a way tyred tractor would, except sooner as they do not cut through the greasy wet layer on top to get to a drier grippier layer underneath. Reversible ploughs are more expensive as you buy double the components. But the wearing parts do half the work, so that cancels out that initial higher cost. Mainly though the advantage is that you cover a field from one side right across to the other. There is no need to try and match your work and there are no ridges or troughs like you get when you throw furrows together at the start and a gulley where you end with furrows being thrown away from each other. Those problems take some work to eradicate with following equipment. This is why you rarely see a conventional plough working these days, at least in Europe.
@@alexveldhuis6004 the weight transfer makes some sense, although the design already has a substantial front bias, at least it appears that way. The reverdible plows though... Still wondering why the equivalent of four plows and not seeing a significant advantage.. It's no big deal to minimize the dead furrow. Fill in last year's dead furrow when setting out what we call a "land" in North America and I've even used the plow to partly backfill the dead furrow anyway. Set out the width of the lands to optimize the headland travel distance against the need to make excessively sharp turns. With modern automated steering, I would think the argument for the reversible idea is weaker still. Maybe the advantage is greater when plowing a lot of sod ?? Or hillsides where it might make contour plowing simpler. Maybe those two factors are the biggest factors. In Canada and the US, there's no longer a lot of mouldboard plowing anyway, but in the old days, we just added more horsepower and more plow bottoms. Even back in those days, very few used mounted plows. Mostly semi-mounted for anything up to about 7 furrows and then some trail plows once into the big stuff.
Eccellente
Cele mai tari tractoare sunt john derre si fendt
To je hrůza já bych si teda osobně prvně ty sloupy a tu skruž ovoral a pak pokračoval takovýhle košťata tam kolem nechat to je ostuda.
This has to be one of the most ridiculous machine ideas I have ever seen.
I agree with you. This is stupid !!
Ну и зачем эта мастурбация, впереди плуг мешает рулить
Nice I like It :D
Mooi
Only one problem your not running on land
front plooughing kill the tractor so fast beter puret 8 plugs in the back
Les chenilles ne respect pas la raie ouverte de la charrue en surface c'est bien mais en dessous ce n'est pas pareil
Мощь)
This mission is not workout in India country
Nothing new, We were doing that in the 70s,
shut up
why click the video then, idiot
I don't see anywhere in the video that they are claiming that it is new.
Cheaper to get a 10 bottom plough
Pip
ឥលូវ