I Dyno Tested My 2024 Chevy Colorado ZR2... And These Were The Results

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 103

  • @TheBullitt2001
    @TheBullitt2001 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Just curious is this supposed to be a reusable filter like K&N or replaceable? Very interesting gains with just a filter alone, can't wait to see a long term review.

    • @GeorgiaZR2
      @GeorgiaZR2  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yes, they are reusable

  • @Phiterify
    @Phiterify 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Subscribed for more results with this new filter and also other vids you have on your channel. Great content!

  • @grey1wa
    @grey1wa 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I have a 23 AT4 and from your initial results I'm sold ;)

  • @markskowneski5717
    @markskowneski5717 4 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    Do you have a release date yet when you can bye them ?

  • @nismo370z4
    @nismo370z4 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Thats not an mpg test 😅😂
    Fill the tank, reset the trip odometer. Drive for a decent range of miles, refill the tank and divide the trip miles by the gallons to refill.
    The dash display is an estimate, and changes with temperature, idle time, highway speeds, stop and go driving. It ain't rocket science, it's common sense !

    • @EGGINFOOLS
      @EGGINFOOLS 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Also comparing less than 100 miles to over 10k driving span isnt realistic.

    • @LuisA-fc3ox
      @LuisA-fc3ox 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Idle time is huge.

    • @AdorableDeplorable1
      @AdorableDeplorable1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      While you are correct in general, I have been tracking the mpg on my 2024 ZR2 comparing the truck's estimate vs hand calculations. For my truck they are within 1% typically. YMMV...

    • @GeorgiaZR2
      @GeorgiaZR2  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This was initial testing on a filter I only had for a few weeks. I said this is initial testing multiple times. I will do an in depth test when I recieve the production version. This wasn't an end all be all and I said that multiple times.

    • @WhiteKnight-5775
      @WhiteKnight-5775 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      If you want a true MPG reading. Fill up, set trip meter, drive at least 1000 miles, keep track of gasoline used and fill up at the end of whatever miles you choose. That is the MPG of the vehicle. This checking every tank is useless.

  • @wesharris07
    @wesharris07 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Man I need to test drive one of these. I test drove the gmc at4x bison and I’m not gonna lie. I loved it

    • @harolddenton6031
      @harolddenton6031 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I test drove a Colorado zr2 bison. Ended up deciding to buy the base 2024 colorado zr2 model to save the almost 12 grand price difference to buy the bison version. Instead I put bigger 34.1 inch bfgoodrich ko2 size 285/75R18 tires on my truck. The bigger tires did reduce my mpg over the stock 285/70R18 (size 32.7" tall) Goodyear territory multi terrain tirestl that came on the truck.

    • @wesharris07
      @wesharris07 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ ya that’s my issue. $9k for just the bison package. Good thing is the bumper is super low profile and 35s. Bad thing the fifth wheel mount in the bed of the truck is kind of annoying.

    • @GeorgiaZR2
      @GeorgiaZR2  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@harolddenton6031 100% the right move in my opinion getting the ZR2 over the Bison

    • @davidwethington9320
      @davidwethington9320 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I went to get a ZR2 and somehow ended up with an AT4X. It was a good deal so I couldn't say no. I put a 2/1 lift and a set of 35/11.5/17 Falkens on. So far so good. I love the truck but have mild regret on not getting the ZR2. It was tough choosing. They both look so good. I'll keep watching to see how everything turns out with the filter. Wouldn't mind getting back the 2 mpg I lost.

    • @ColeFellner
      @ColeFellner 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Love my bison!

  • @dickmuskevitsch4586
    @dickmuskevitsch4586 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Great job, I'm interested in the product!

  • @mikeholybee5775
    @mikeholybee5775 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I own a 2023 Colorado Z71. I have about the same milage as you have on your ZR2. I also have my engine tuned to High output and changed my filter when I completed this upgrade to my engine, I get about the same miles per gallon you were getting before the filter change. I would love to test this new filter in my truck, when it is avaliable! Thank you for the step by step with this new product.

  • @Starting-Life-Again
    @Starting-Life-Again 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    So, the shop didn’t do any tuning? Just a simple filter change?

  • @franciscoaguilar187
    @franciscoaguilar187 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    You should do an oil analysis with the new filter to see how well it performs keeping dirt out the engine

    • @GeorgiaZR2
      @GeorgiaZR2  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      What do I do? Just drive for 5,000 miles, change the oil, keep some and send it to a lab? We can do that but I'm not sure how to go about it. I guess I'd need data from the oil from the stock filter as well.

    • @claytonbrandes
      @claytonbrandes 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@GeorgiaZR2 correct.

    • @GeorgiaZR2
      @GeorgiaZR2  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@claytonbrandes ok I’m down to do this. It’s a great idea I’ll figure it out on my end.

    • @franciscoaguilar187
      @franciscoaguilar187 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’ve seen comparisons between the k&n filter vs oem filters and from the research gathered oem filters filter more of the dirt. When they do oil analysis they always look for the amount of silicon.

    • @raymondkassay3610
      @raymondkassay3610 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ya Blackstone laboratories do a great job, I've done it on my camaro a few times after heads and cam install. And my buddy and i did a few of them on our tundra's to see which oils performed the best. Also pay the few bucks extra for the TBN number. It tell you how much protection and longer you can go between oil changes.

  • @Encourageable
    @Encourageable 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I plan to get a ZR2 in early 2025. I have a 2016 Colorado with the diesel which I love but I like the redesign looks great. My 2016 has hydraulic cylinders to hold the hood up - they should have left that in place for the redesign 😩

    • @GeorgiaZR2
      @GeorgiaZR2  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree! They have an aftermarket one I'm considering putting on.

  • @DerrickMoody-lh8fs
    @DerrickMoody-lh8fs 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have the same exact truck . I live in north ga and I average 20.1. I believe the oil matters. I run Valvoline gold top advanced protection 5w30 dexos. I did a lot of studying prior to going away from Mobil 1. It will cause bearing coking. Also after driving ANY vehicle with a turbo, you should let it cool off before shutting the engine down. It will allow those bearing to cool off. The turbo will last much longer. Just like a turbine helicopter or plane cooling off for the same reason. Great video. I like the information

    • @AdorableDeplorable1
      @AdorableDeplorable1 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Regarding the Turbo - the 2.7l motor has an electric water pump that continues to run after shutdown to specifically address Turbo cool down.

  • @wallace406
    @wallace406 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Did you use a new stock air filter for the testing or was it the same 10,000 mile filter you pulled out when you put in the aftermarket filter? That might make a difference in mileage and horsepower.

  • @josephscaggs5367
    @josephscaggs5367 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    How can an airfilter change alone make a 14hp increase, also no mention of any increase in torque

  • @marksullivan8200
    @marksullivan8200 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The truck runs a bit lean for emissions I'd run that filter with a banks pedal monster as it deactivates in reverse so it won't launch you backing up & getting fuel quicker isn't a bad thing as they map the truck lean for emissions from factory & your using a high flow very efficient filter look at Gale Banks comparing pedal monster vs competitors it'll work great with the filter your using

  • @thelifeoffuller
    @thelifeoffuller 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I run the JB4 map2 and k&n filter it’s crazy fast

  • @robabeita6475
    @robabeita6475 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Will it work on the 2025? I just got mine and the mileage is not favorable.

  • @justinthrasher3132
    @justinthrasher3132 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Was your dyno run 1 and 2 done in different gears? Seems odd that pull one is higher tq but 2 is higher hp

  • @jeremygauthier6531
    @jeremygauthier6531 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Did the dyno operator adjust the tune with the performance filter or was it a straight plug and play?

  • @aldoroman3931
    @aldoroman3931 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What mode were you in "Auto" or "2 wheel drive"? Because I definitely noticed a difference and got slightly better gm when I went to "2 wd". I have a 24 ZR2.

  • @Deezalmech
    @Deezalmech 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I must of missed it, the numbers from the dyno pulls. I looked at the sheet but couldn't make any sense of it. What were the numbers for the runs?

    • @thatsgreatt
      @thatsgreatt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I read the original in Red at or above 315hp. New filter green below 315hp. Green to me looks like less HP.

    • @GeorgiaZR2
      @GeorgiaZR2  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thatsgreatt you're looking at the wrong line for HP

  • @Chingysfakechain
    @Chingysfakechain หลายเดือนก่อน

    Will the filter work on an LT? With the HO engine?

  • @ronhu6035
    @ronhu6035 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    You had this filter for how long? Their website doesn't mention it yet. Which leans to me they are not seeing perf as you did, or something else.

  • @DaveStokes-i4u
    @DaveStokes-i4u 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I can't wait till i can get my hands on this and test it out. What your showing is VERY encouraging. Looks like they're pretty $$$$. But if reusable and gains are obtained it'll be worth it. Cost is what....1 Attack Blue = 3-4 'Stock/Normal' (Fram) ??

  • @kritonman1
    @kritonman1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have the Colorado bison. I live in NJ and i drive a lot off-road in Wharton state forest which is extremely sandy!! I’d like some info on this filter to help prevent that fine sand from getting into the engine.

    • @justinschneider6657
      @justinschneider6657 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your stock filter will do just as good.

  • @rodneyjones8582
    @rodneyjones8582 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video! 😊

    • @GeorgiaZR2
      @GeorgiaZR2  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rodneyjones8582 thanks for your support!

  • @georgeferrer23
    @georgeferrer23 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a 2024 chevy Colorado trail boss and i love it. When will this filter be released to the market?

    • @GeorgiaZR2
      @GeorgiaZR2  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Beginning of this year. I'll do an in depth review once I recieve the production version.

  • @Cringer101
    @Cringer101 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    trouble is with all these kinds of mesh/cloth filters they tend to let through larger particulates which is a trade off for more airflow, now will that be a problem for engine longevity, you wont know really

    • @alexcarbery8189
      @alexcarbery8189 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In the video, he states this filter is good down to smaller particulates than the stock filter.

  • @theshtonsesh1278
    @theshtonsesh1278 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Can you compare it with the Summit Racing air filter ?

    • @theshtonsesh1278
      @theshtonsesh1278 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Afe power*

    • @GeorgiaZR2
      @GeorgiaZR2  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If someone pays for the dyno I will lol

  • @Onechrispbacon
    @Onechrispbacon 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Did they unlock and tune the ecu? If not then it's not optimized..

  • @DavisRoofingInc
    @DavisRoofingInc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dont forget the tune your buddy put in for the increase in hp and mpg 😂

  • @keithmiley2308
    @keithmiley2308 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is VERY interesting to me. I also have a 2024 Colorado ZR2 (same color) and have been looking for ways to improve the gas mileage. Best I have ever gotten was 17.9. Has anyone looked into the program chips, such as Evolv? Was wondering if something like that would help as well.

  • @ronmac1832
    @ronmac1832 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Real world testing A to B would help convince me.

    • @GeorgiaZR2
      @GeorgiaZR2  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I will do that once I recieve the production version

  • @daviddover5548
    @daviddover5548 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Will their production filter differ any from the prototype? Unfortunately, some companies will push out production items that will differ from the prototype to save a little $$, and this is where they cut corners, and you just don't get the quality of the prototype. I was just wondering.

    • @GeorgiaZR2
      @GeorgiaZR2  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'll make a follow up video on the production version right at the launch but I do not believe they have any intention of changing anything. They were happy with the performance.

    • @daviddover5548
      @daviddover5548 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great. Look forward to the follow-up. Thanks for the good content and keep it up!

    • @GeorgiaZR2
      @GeorgiaZR2  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@daviddover5548 thanks for coming around and watching the videos! 😎

  • @robertedwards3822
    @robertedwards3822 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I gotta say, I’m very skeptical. I have never seen a massive change in horsepower AND efficiency gain like that from just switching the air filter. I had a 2011 Mustang GT 5.0 coyote V8 and I had a VPN tune put on it with a KNN filter and I achieved about 8 hp increase. I think you’re gonna need to do multiple pulls on that Dyno and a much more controlled scientific fuel efficiency test to really make sure there’s no errors there. I do appreciate you putting this video out there and giving us some data. If that filter really does what you say they’re going to sell a lot of them.

    • @GeorgiaZR2
      @GeorgiaZR2  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      We did 4 pulls total. 2 on stock and 2 on the prototype and the numbers were pretty much the same. The 2nd pull on the prototype was on a slightly different design but it still performed almost identical. K&N advertises 12-25. Many companies advertise 25+ HP gains. I'm not sure how much more transparent I could have been. Sure I could do a more scientific fuel effeciency test but keep in mind... I don't work for this company, I'm not a paid advertiser, I do TH-cam occassionally for fun (unpaid) as a hobby and this was just my experience with it.

  • @thatsgreatt
    @thatsgreatt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Did I read the HP dyno wrong? Red line original just above 315HP. Green new filter just under 315HP. Checked it twice.

    • @GeorgiaZR2
      @GeorgiaZR2  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The middle line of red and green is HP

  • @danhufferdoutdoors
    @danhufferdoutdoors 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My 1999 dodge 3500 gets 17mpg with 4:10 gears.

  • @dustycourt
    @dustycourt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great video, but you are comparing apples to oranges on the mpg. The short drive cannot be compared with the long 10k mpg. I consistently get 20 - 24 mpg on short in town trips with very little stopping. Long term with 6k I’m averaging 18 mpg.

    • @GeorgiaZR2
      @GeorgiaZR2  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dustycourt I hear you but over the course of the 1400 miles I put on, I was well above 20mpg. Remember… I said multiple times that this was initial testing. There is no way for me to put 10,000 miles on a prototype in 1 week.

  • @RyanBaxley-j3u
    @RyanBaxley-j3u 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a at4x 24, same engine I can tell a difference

    • @RyanBaxley-j3u
      @RyanBaxley-j3u 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In the sound, I definitely want one

  • @carsynm5636
    @carsynm5636 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I gotta say - most disappointing thing about my 23’ ZR2 is easily the engine. GM needs to use the 3.0 twin turbo V6 out of the Cadillac CT5 V.

    • @dusty0924
      @dusty0924 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They actually run well for a midsize truck. I got a 24 zr2 and have a friend with a first gen raptor the 6.2. We are both on 35s and neither has been regeared. My Colorado walks the raptor every run by about a half a truck. That’s from a dig in 2wd not using launch control just foot braking both trucks. But if you are looking for something faster why would you be in the midsize truck market? They aren’t meant to be pavement performance vehicles. Or buy a ranger raptor. But in that midsize truck range the only thing that out performed them is the ranger raptor. Maybe the hybrid Tacoma trd pro but have yet to see that.

  • @barryguffey8061
    @barryguffey8061 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cool

  • @justinschneider6657
    @justinschneider6657 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Should have ran the exact same route first on the stock filter (trip B) then on the new filter (trip B)….comparing the mileage to the first 11,000 is comical.

    • @GeorgiaZR2
      @GeorgiaZR2  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I will once I have the production version. This was initial testing on a prototype.

  • @arnaldoserrano2289
    @arnaldoserrano2289 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Drop in filter, it will not give you any code

  • @rockstar49858
    @rockstar49858 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    5 corners. All FIVE corners lol

  • @mountainadventures7346
    @mountainadventures7346 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It sucks they dropped the diesel….😢

    • @dusty0924
      @dusty0924 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why? If they had put a diesel in it they would have used the new 3.0L and we would have all the same bullshit problems they have had. This has motor performs as well as that 2.7 duramax does. The new 4 cylinder in these was originally designed for tractors from what I’ve read and why it’s got so much torque at low rpm’s

    • @mountainadventures7346
      @mountainadventures7346 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ My son has the diesel. It gets 30 MPG. The bullshit EPA problems instantly go away when you delete them.

    • @dusty0924
      @dusty0924 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @ my brother in law has one it’s gets 25 but it’s on 35s and it’s been a huge pile of shit but it isn’t deleted.

    • @mountainadventures7346
      @mountainadventures7346 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ I would definitely consider deleting it. Life changing! The US Government recently took a shipment of diesel trucks for the military….they were ALL deleted. 🙄 And supposedly the EPA lost a court case concerning deleted diesels. They cannot make us run stuff that destroys the engine.

  • @WY-DaveZ71
    @WY-DaveZ71 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Would be TERRIBLE to put a fart can on your Colorado!!

    • @GeorgiaZR2
      @GeorgiaZR2  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      lol I won't lie... when I was a TEENAGER I had a 2004 Chevy Cavalier and yes- it had a can 😂😂

    • @DaveStokes-i4u
      @DaveStokes-i4u 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@GeorgiaZR2😂😅

    • @dusty0924
      @dusty0924 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The magnaflow overland exhaust actually sounds good on this motor.

  • @tonyw7033
    @tonyw7033 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Useless without giving before and after HP results.

  • @a990dna
    @a990dna 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why are you running a K&N to begin with? Worst air filter you can use off-road.

    • @GeorgiaZR2
      @GeorgiaZR2  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@a990dna I’m not running a K&N. Not sure how you got that.

    • @a990dna
      @a990dna 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @I thought that was a K&N you pulled out of the air box. My apology...

    • @GeorgiaZR2
      @GeorgiaZR2  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @ it’s all good my man

    • @coreysharp9794
      @coreysharp9794 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Please explain that when baja trucks run k&n air filters.

    • @a990dna
      @a990dna 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@coreysharp9794 I don't need to explain anything. My vehicles aren't Baja race trucks. Baja race trucks get the engines torn down or replaced after the race.

  • @aaronmiles1971
    @aaronmiles1971 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is the most bullshit review and test I've ever seen.

  • @thewireman134
    @thewireman134 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Iphone user. Immediately discredited.

    • @Mjr1348
      @Mjr1348 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because he uses an IPhone……. 🤦🏻

    • @dusty0924
      @dusty0924 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Must be from California 😅😂