Just curious is this supposed to be a reusable filter like K&N or replaceable? Very interesting gains with just a filter alone, can't wait to see a long term review.
You lost all credibility claiming mpg improvements like that from a drop in filter. You think gm wouldn't spend 20 bucks to put a superior filter in and increase mpg? These filters have been tested hundreds of times in hundreds of more legitimate tests. Also not telling us verbally the horsepower and talking about the dyno sheet was a big miss.
Agreed. I can totally believe a slight increase in HP from a performance drop in filter, but claiming around a 30% increase in fuel economy is straight up lies. I want to see a 100 mile loop with the stock filter vs the performance filter. I like the new Colorado and Canyon but this video is straight up not sharing much for factual info for these trucks.
Thats not an mpg test 😅😂 Fill the tank, reset the trip odometer. Drive for a decent range of miles, refill the tank and divide the trip miles by the gallons to refill. The dash display is an estimate, and changes with temperature, idle time, highway speeds, stop and go driving. It ain't rocket science, it's common sense !
While you are correct in general, I have been tracking the mpg on my 2024 ZR2 comparing the truck's estimate vs hand calculations. For my truck they are within 1% typically. YMMV...
What do I do? Just drive for 5,000 miles, change the oil, keep some and send it to a lab? We can do that but I'm not sure how to go about it. I guess I'd need data from the oil from the stock filter as well.
I’ve seen comparisons between the k&n filter vs oem filters and from the research gathered oem filters filter more of the dirt. When they do oil analysis they always look for the amount of silicon.
Ya Blackstone laboratories do a great job, I've done it on my camaro a few times after heads and cam install. And my buddy and i did a few of them on our tundra's to see which oils performed the best. Also pay the few bucks extra for the TBN number. It tell you how much protection and longer you can go between oil changes.
I test drove a Colorado zr2 bison. Ended up deciding to buy the base 2024 colorado zr2 model to save the almost 12 grand price difference to buy the bison version. Instead I put bigger 34.1 inch bfgoodrich ko2 size 285/75R18 tires on my truck. The bigger tires did reduce my mpg over the stock 285/70R18 (size 32.7" tall) Goodyear territory multi terrain tirestl that came on the truck.
@ ya that’s my issue. $9k for just the bison package. Good thing is the bumper is super low profile and 35s. Bad thing the fifth wheel mount in the bed of the truck is kind of annoying.
I went to get a ZR2 and somehow ended up with an AT4X. It was a good deal so I couldn't say no. I put a 2/1 lift and a set of 35/11.5/17 Falkens on. So far so good. I love the truck but have mild regret on not getting the ZR2. It was tough choosing. They both look so good. I'll keep watching to see how everything turns out with the filter. Wouldn't mind getting back the 2 mpg I lost.
I own a 2023 Colorado Z71. I have about the same milage as you have on your ZR2. I also have my engine tuned to High output and changed my filter when I completed this upgrade to my engine, I get about the same miles per gallon you were getting before the filter change. I would love to test this new filter in my truck, when it is avaliable! Thank you for the step by step with this new product.
Did you use a new stock air filter for the testing or was it the same 10,000 mile filter you pulled out when you put in the aftermarket filter? That might make a difference in mileage and horsepower.
I have the same exact truck . I live in north ga and I average 20.1. I believe the oil matters. I run Valvoline gold top advanced protection 5w30 dexos. I did a lot of studying prior to going away from Mobil 1. It will cause bearing coking. Also after driving ANY vehicle with a turbo, you should let it cool off before shutting the engine down. It will allow those bearing to cool off. The turbo will last much longer. Just like a turbine helicopter or plane cooling off for the same reason. Great video. I like the information
What mode were you in "Auto" or "2 wheel drive"? Because I definitely noticed a difference and got slightly better gm when I went to "2 wd". I have a 24 ZR2.
I plan to get a ZR2 in early 2025. I have a 2016 Colorado with the diesel which I love but I like the redesign looks great. My 2016 has hydraulic cylinders to hold the hood up - they should have left that in place for the redesign 😩
I have the Colorado bison. I live in NJ and i drive a lot off-road in Wharton state forest which is extremely sandy!! I’d like some info on this filter to help prevent that fine sand from getting into the engine.
Will their production filter differ any from the prototype? Unfortunately, some companies will push out production items that will differ from the prototype to save a little $$, and this is where they cut corners, and you just don't get the quality of the prototype. I was just wondering.
I'll make a follow up video on the production version right at the launch but I do not believe they have any intention of changing anything. They were happy with the performance.
trouble is with all these kinds of mesh/cloth filters they tend to let through larger particulates which is a trade off for more airflow, now will that be a problem for engine longevity, you wont know really
This is VERY interesting to me. I also have a 2024 Colorado ZR2 (same color) and have been looking for ways to improve the gas mileage. Best I have ever gotten was 17.9. Has anyone looked into the program chips, such as Evolv? Was wondering if something like that would help as well.
I can't wait till i can get my hands on this and test it out. What your showing is VERY encouraging. Looks like they're pretty $$$$. But if reusable and gains are obtained it'll be worth it. Cost is what....1 Attack Blue = 3-4 'Stock/Normal' (Fram) ??
I gotta say, I’m very skeptical. I have never seen a massive change in horsepower AND efficiency gain like that from just switching the air filter. I had a 2011 Mustang GT 5.0 coyote V8 and I had a VPN tune put on it with a KNN filter and I achieved about 8 hp increase. I think you’re gonna need to do multiple pulls on that Dyno and a much more controlled scientific fuel efficiency test to really make sure there’s no errors there. I do appreciate you putting this video out there and giving us some data. If that filter really does what you say they’re going to sell a lot of them.
We did 4 pulls total. 2 on stock and 2 on the prototype and the numbers were pretty much the same. The 2nd pull on the prototype was on a slightly different design but it still performed almost identical. K&N advertises 12-25. Many companies advertise 25+ HP gains. I'm not sure how much more transparent I could have been. Sure I could do a more scientific fuel effeciency test but keep in mind... I don't work for this company, I'm not a paid advertiser, I do TH-cam occassionally for fun (unpaid) as a hobby and this was just my experience with it.
Great video, but you are comparing apples to oranges on the mpg. The short drive cannot be compared with the long 10k mpg. I consistently get 20 - 24 mpg on short in town trips with very little stopping. Long term with 6k I’m averaging 18 mpg.
@@dustycourt I hear you but over the course of the 1400 miles I put on, I was well above 20mpg. Remember… I said multiple times that this was initial testing. There is no way for me to put 10,000 miles on a prototype in 1 week.
Should have ran the exact same route first on the stock filter (trip B) then on the new filter (trip B)….comparing the mileage to the first 11,000 is comical.
They actually run well for a midsize truck. I got a 24 zr2 and have a friend with a first gen raptor the 6.2. We are both on 35s and neither has been regeared. My Colorado walks the raptor every run by about a half a truck. That’s from a dig in 2wd not using launch control just foot braking both trucks. But if you are looking for something faster why would you be in the midsize truck market? They aren’t meant to be pavement performance vehicles. Or buy a ranger raptor. But in that midsize truck range the only thing that out performed them is the ranger raptor. Maybe the hybrid Tacoma trd pro but have yet to see that.
Why? If they had put a diesel in it they would have used the new 3.0L and we would have all the same bullshit problems they have had. This has motor performs as well as that 2.7 duramax does. The new 4 cylinder in these was originally designed for tractors from what I’ve read and why it’s got so much torque at low rpm’s
@ I would definitely consider deleting it. Life changing! The US Government recently took a shipment of diesel trucks for the military….they were ALL deleted. 🙄 And supposedly the EPA lost a court case concerning deleted diesels. They cannot make us run stuff that destroys the engine.
@@coreysharp9794 I don't need to explain anything. My vehicles aren't Baja race trucks. Baja race trucks get the engines torn down or replaced after the race.
Just curious is this supposed to be a reusable filter like K&N or replaceable? Very interesting gains with just a filter alone, can't wait to see a long term review.
Yes, they are reusable
You lost all credibility claiming mpg improvements like that from a drop in filter. You think gm wouldn't spend 20 bucks to put a superior filter in and increase mpg? These filters have been tested hundreds of times in hundreds of more legitimate tests. Also not telling us verbally the horsepower and talking about the dyno sheet was a big miss.
Agreed. I can totally believe a slight increase in HP from a performance drop in filter, but claiming around a 30% increase in fuel economy is straight up lies. I want to see a 100 mile loop with the stock filter vs the performance filter. I like the new Colorado and Canyon but this video is straight up not sharing much for factual info for these trucks.
Thats not an mpg test 😅😂
Fill the tank, reset the trip odometer. Drive for a decent range of miles, refill the tank and divide the trip miles by the gallons to refill.
The dash display is an estimate, and changes with temperature, idle time, highway speeds, stop and go driving. It ain't rocket science, it's common sense !
Also comparing less than 100 miles to over 10k driving span isnt realistic.
Idle time is huge.
While you are correct in general, I have been tracking the mpg on my 2024 ZR2 comparing the truck's estimate vs hand calculations. For my truck they are within 1% typically. YMMV...
Entire video is a paid advertisement for the filter. It’s no better than stock.
You should do an oil analysis with the new filter to see how well it performs keeping dirt out the engine
What do I do? Just drive for 5,000 miles, change the oil, keep some and send it to a lab? We can do that but I'm not sure how to go about it. I guess I'd need data from the oil from the stock filter as well.
@@GeorgiaZR2 correct.
@@claytonbrandes ok I’m down to do this. It’s a great idea I’ll figure it out on my end.
I’ve seen comparisons between the k&n filter vs oem filters and from the research gathered oem filters filter more of the dirt. When they do oil analysis they always look for the amount of silicon.
Ya Blackstone laboratories do a great job, I've done it on my camaro a few times after heads and cam install. And my buddy and i did a few of them on our tundra's to see which oils performed the best. Also pay the few bucks extra for the TBN number. It tell you how much protection and longer you can go between oil changes.
Great job, I'm interested in the product!
Man I need to test drive one of these. I test drove the gmc at4x bison and I’m not gonna lie. I loved it
I test drove a Colorado zr2 bison. Ended up deciding to buy the base 2024 colorado zr2 model to save the almost 12 grand price difference to buy the bison version. Instead I put bigger 34.1 inch bfgoodrich ko2 size 285/75R18 tires on my truck. The bigger tires did reduce my mpg over the stock 285/70R18 (size 32.7" tall) Goodyear territory multi terrain tirestl that came on the truck.
@ ya that’s my issue. $9k for just the bison package. Good thing is the bumper is super low profile and 35s. Bad thing the fifth wheel mount in the bed of the truck is kind of annoying.
@@harolddenton6031 100% the right move in my opinion getting the ZR2 over the Bison
I went to get a ZR2 and somehow ended up with an AT4X. It was a good deal so I couldn't say no. I put a 2/1 lift and a set of 35/11.5/17 Falkens on. So far so good. I love the truck but have mild regret on not getting the ZR2. It was tough choosing. They both look so good. I'll keep watching to see how everything turns out with the filter. Wouldn't mind getting back the 2 mpg I lost.
Love my bison!
I own a 2023 Colorado Z71. I have about the same milage as you have on your ZR2. I also have my engine tuned to High output and changed my filter when I completed this upgrade to my engine, I get about the same miles per gallon you were getting before the filter change. I would love to test this new filter in my truck, when it is avaliable! Thank you for the step by step with this new product.
Will the filter work on an LT? With the HO engine?
Did you use a new stock air filter for the testing or was it the same 10,000 mile filter you pulled out when you put in the aftermarket filter? That might make a difference in mileage and horsepower.
Great video! 😊
@@rodneyjones8582 thanks for your support!
I have the same exact truck . I live in north ga and I average 20.1. I believe the oil matters. I run Valvoline gold top advanced protection 5w30 dexos. I did a lot of studying prior to going away from Mobil 1. It will cause bearing coking. Also after driving ANY vehicle with a turbo, you should let it cool off before shutting the engine down. It will allow those bearing to cool off. The turbo will last much longer. Just like a turbine helicopter or plane cooling off for the same reason. Great video. I like the information
Regarding the Turbo - the 2.7l motor has an electric water pump that continues to run after shutdown to specifically address Turbo cool down.
I must of missed it, the numbers from the dyno pulls. I looked at the sheet but couldn't make any sense of it. What were the numbers for the runs?
I read the original in Red at or above 315hp. New filter green below 315hp. Green to me looks like less HP.
@@thatsgreatt you're looking at the wrong line for HP
Did the dyno operator adjust the tune with the performance filter or was it a straight plug and play?
Was your dyno run 1 and 2 done in different gears? Seems odd that pull one is higher tq but 2 is higher hp
What mode were you in "Auto" or "2 wheel drive"? Because I definitely noticed a difference and got slightly better gm when I went to "2 wd". I have a 24 ZR2.
I plan to get a ZR2 in early 2025. I have a 2016 Colorado with the diesel which I love but I like the redesign looks great. My 2016 has hydraulic cylinders to hold the hood up - they should have left that in place for the redesign 😩
I agree! They have an aftermarket one I'm considering putting on.
Can you compare it with the Summit Racing air filter ?
Afe power*
If someone pays for the dyno I will lol
I have the Colorado bison. I live in NJ and i drive a lot off-road in Wharton state forest which is extremely sandy!! I’d like some info on this filter to help prevent that fine sand from getting into the engine.
Your stock filter will do just as good.
Did they unlock and tune the ecu? If not then it's not optimized..
Will their production filter differ any from the prototype? Unfortunately, some companies will push out production items that will differ from the prototype to save a little $$, and this is where they cut corners, and you just don't get the quality of the prototype. I was just wondering.
I'll make a follow up video on the production version right at the launch but I do not believe they have any intention of changing anything. They were happy with the performance.
Great. Look forward to the follow-up. Thanks for the good content and keep it up!
@@daviddover5548 thanks for coming around and watching the videos! 😎
trouble is with all these kinds of mesh/cloth filters they tend to let through larger particulates which is a trade off for more airflow, now will that be a problem for engine longevity, you wont know really
In the video, he states this filter is good down to smaller particulates than the stock filter.
I have a 2024 chevy Colorado trail boss and i love it. When will this filter be released to the market?
Real world testing A to B would help convince me.
This is VERY interesting to me. I also have a 2024 Colorado ZR2 (same color) and have been looking for ways to improve the gas mileage. Best I have ever gotten was 17.9. Has anyone looked into the program chips, such as Evolv? Was wondering if something like that would help as well.
I can't wait till i can get my hands on this and test it out. What your showing is VERY encouraging. Looks like they're pretty $$$$. But if reusable and gains are obtained it'll be worth it. Cost is what....1 Attack Blue = 3-4 'Stock/Normal' (Fram) ??
I run the JB4 map2 and k&n filter it’s crazy fast
I gotta say, I’m very skeptical. I have never seen a massive change in horsepower AND efficiency gain like that from just switching the air filter. I had a 2011 Mustang GT 5.0 coyote V8 and I had a VPN tune put on it with a KNN filter and I achieved about 8 hp increase. I think you’re gonna need to do multiple pulls on that Dyno and a much more controlled scientific fuel efficiency test to really make sure there’s no errors there. I do appreciate you putting this video out there and giving us some data. If that filter really does what you say they’re going to sell a lot of them.
We did 4 pulls total. 2 on stock and 2 on the prototype and the numbers were pretty much the same. The 2nd pull on the prototype was on a slightly different design but it still performed almost identical. K&N advertises 12-25. Many companies advertise 25+ HP gains. I'm not sure how much more transparent I could have been. Sure I could do a more scientific fuel effeciency test but keep in mind... I don't work for this company, I'm not a paid advertiser, I do TH-cam occassionally for fun (unpaid) as a hobby and this was just my experience with it.
Great video, but you are comparing apples to oranges on the mpg. The short drive cannot be compared with the long 10k mpg. I consistently get 20 - 24 mpg on short in town trips with very little stopping. Long term with 6k I’m averaging 18 mpg.
@@dustycourt I hear you but over the course of the 1400 miles I put on, I was well above 20mpg. Remember… I said multiple times that this was initial testing. There is no way for me to put 10,000 miles on a prototype in 1 week.
Dont forget the tune your buddy put in for the increase in hp and mpg 😂
Did I read the HP dyno wrong? Red line original just above 315HP. Green new filter just under 315HP. Checked it twice.
The middle line of red and green is HP
My 1999 dodge 3500 gets 17mpg with 4:10 gears.
I have a at4x 24, same engine I can tell a difference
In the sound, I definitely want one
Should have ran the exact same route first on the stock filter (trip B) then on the new filter (trip B)….comparing the mileage to the first 11,000 is comical.
I gotta say - most disappointing thing about my 23’ ZR2 is easily the engine. GM needs to use the 3.0 twin turbo V6 out of the Cadillac CT5 V.
They actually run well for a midsize truck. I got a 24 zr2 and have a friend with a first gen raptor the 6.2. We are both on 35s and neither has been regeared. My Colorado walks the raptor every run by about a half a truck. That’s from a dig in 2wd not using launch control just foot braking both trucks. But if you are looking for something faster why would you be in the midsize truck market? They aren’t meant to be pavement performance vehicles. Or buy a ranger raptor. But in that midsize truck range the only thing that out performed them is the ranger raptor. Maybe the hybrid Tacoma trd pro but have yet to see that.
Drop in filter, it will not give you any code
Cool
It sucks they dropped the diesel….😢
Why? If they had put a diesel in it they would have used the new 3.0L and we would have all the same bullshit problems they have had. This has motor performs as well as that 2.7 duramax does. The new 4 cylinder in these was originally designed for tractors from what I’ve read and why it’s got so much torque at low rpm’s
@ My son has the diesel. It gets 30 MPG. The bullshit EPA problems instantly go away when you delete them.
@ my brother in law has one it’s gets 25 but it’s on 35s and it’s been a huge pile of shit but it isn’t deleted.
@ I would definitely consider deleting it. Life changing! The US Government recently took a shipment of diesel trucks for the military….they were ALL deleted. 🙄 And supposedly the EPA lost a court case concerning deleted diesels. They cannot make us run stuff that destroys the engine.
5 corners. All FIVE corners lol
Why are you running a K&N to begin with? Worst air filter you can use off-road.
@@a990dna I’m not running a K&N. Not sure how you got that.
@I thought that was a K&N you pulled out of the air box. My apology...
@ it’s all good my man
Please explain that when baja trucks run k&n air filters.
@@coreysharp9794 I don't need to explain anything. My vehicles aren't Baja race trucks. Baja race trucks get the engines torn down or replaced after the race.
Would be TERRIBLE to put a fart can on your Colorado!!
lol I won't lie... when I was a TEENAGER I had a 2004 Chevy Cavalier and yes- it had a can 😂😂
@@GeorgiaZR2😂😅
The magnaflow overland exhaust actually sounds good on this motor.
Iphone user. Immediately discredited.
Because he uses an IPhone……. 🤦🏻
Must be from California 😅😂