Using Ramanujan's Master Theorem to solve complicated integrals!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 40

  • @levonnigogoosian7547
    @levonnigogoosian7547 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    I think you present very well but an improvement would be to write more clearly. Please regard this as an improvement rather than a criticism

  • @lokeshraybarman7007
    @lokeshraybarman7007 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Your posts r unique man ❤❤❤❤love

  • @lewisfirth
    @lewisfirth ปีที่แล้ว +6

    this is even more satisfying than the feynman trick 😮‍💨

    • @danielrosado3213
      @danielrosado3213  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I know! The way it destroys crazy integrals in seconds is unmatched

  • @nizogos
    @nizogos ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why can we use the expansion of 1/(1+t) even though we are outside of its domain of convergence ?

    • @danielrosado3213
      @danielrosado3213  ปีที่แล้ว

      This is the magic of ramanujan’s master theorem. As long as the expansion of the function is valid in some open disc of radius>0, ramanujan’s master theorem will hold, as long as the integral itself converges

  • @krisbrandenberger544
    @krisbrandenberger544 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    For the last problem, it would have been easier to replace ln(1+x) with 1/(1+x). Then, Phi(n)=Gamma(n+1), making the value of the integral Gamma(s)*Gamma(1-s), and thus the final answer
    pi*csc(pi*s).

    • @danielrosado3213
      @danielrosado3213  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Do you mean using integration by parts? Because otherwise it would be a different problem.

    • @krisbrandenberger544
      @krisbrandenberger544 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, I meant by using Ramanujan's Master Theorem.

    • @danielrosado3213
      @danielrosado3213  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@krisbrandenberger544 but if I simply replace ln(1+x) with 1/(1+x) then I am solving an entirely different problem, not the one I had set out to solve.

    • @krisbrandenberger544
      @krisbrandenberger544 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@danielrosado3213 But if you look at the series expansion for
      ln(1+x), the sum would start at n=1 instead of n=0, because division by 0 is not allowed. And Ramanujan's Master Theorem only applies to sums that start at n=0.

    • @danielrosado3213
      @danielrosado3213  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@krisbrandenberger544 true, I should have shifted the index of the power series of ln(1+x) in order to account for that. Thank you for pointing this out.

  • @ChunkMonkYT
    @ChunkMonkYT ปีที่แล้ว +3

    i learned what an exponent was today!

  • @maths_505
    @maths_505 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    F**k....overkill but awesome nonetheless

    • @danielrosado3213
      @danielrosado3213  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      as long as it gets me a beautiful solution 😉

  • @fengshengqin6993
    @fengshengqin6993 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    very good!

  • @HuiSengKheong
    @HuiSengKheong 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    By RMT, the integration of (x^n) dx from 0 to infinity is (1/n)gamma(1/n)sin(pi/(2n)), let n=1 results 1. However, by using Wolfram Apha or other similar software, the answer is divergent. Why?

    • @HuiSengKheong
      @HuiSengKheong 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Typo mistake, i mean integration of sin(x^n) not x^n!

    • @danielrosado3213
      @danielrosado3213  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This integral only converges for certain values of n. It is easy for verify graphically that sinx oscillates infinitely, hence its integral does not converge to a value. For this reason, it’s important to first analyze whether or not an integral converges before applying RMT, because RMT will give you an answer even if the integral diverges

    • @HuiSengKheong
      @HuiSengKheong 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for your speedy reply. I do not have the ability to read the criteria proved by someone for RMT to be valid. Could you make a video how to check if RMT is valid under the given conditions?

    • @danielrosado3213
      @danielrosado3213  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@HuiSengKheong RMT will always be valid if the integral is convergent. I may make a video on this in the future, but I can’t promise anything soon, sorry.

    • @HuiSengKheong
      @HuiSengKheong 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you once again 😊

  • @HuiSengKheong
    @HuiSengKheong 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In the last example, may I know where to get the power expansion of ln(1+x)=-Sum((-1)^n x^n)/n, where n is from 0 to infinity?! Since the denominator is n, if n=0, the sum will blow out!!

    • @danielrosado3213
      @danielrosado3213  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sorry, the summation should be n=1 to infinity

    • @HuiSengKheong
      @HuiSengKheong 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But RMT requests the n starts from 0 to infinity!

    • @danielrosado3213
      @danielrosado3213  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@HuiSengKheong yes, I did the last problem wrong here, it should’ve been done using integration by parts followed by application of the theorem

    • @HuiSengKheong
      @HuiSengKheong 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I still not able to solve the problem using integration by part followed by RMT! Can make a video to show? Thanks.

  • @divergentmaths
    @divergentmaths ปีที่แล้ว

    At 11:29 I think that you forgot the π in the csc().

    • @danielrosado3213
      @danielrosado3213  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, I did but pointed it out in editing. Thank you for pointing out this mistake.

    • @divergentmaths
      @divergentmaths ปีที่แล้ว

      @@danielrosado3213 Thank you for the examples you presented and resolved using Ramanujan's master theorem.
      You should do a series of videos with more examples on this very important theorem in Number Theory.

    • @danielrosado3213
      @danielrosado3213  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@divergentmaths is there a use for this theorem in number theory? That doesn’t really make much sense to me.

  • @Drbabejsk39
    @Drbabejsk39 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Daniel Rosado I love you ❤❤❤
    This video is so amazing my honey

  • @kyle3420
    @kyle3420 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    His name is pronounced "Rama-New-Gin"

    • @merug4349
      @merug4349 ปีที่แล้ว

      this is wayyy off, the way he pronounced was fine/better

  • @lumpi806
    @lumpi806 ปีที่แล้ว

    very inseresting video, but write more clearly, please.

  • @victorcossio
    @victorcossio ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You need to improve your writting. Is not clear enough

  • @oorjitgupta
    @oorjitgupta ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Kindly stop faking american accents, it reduces the quality of your videos

    • @danielrosado3213
      @danielrosado3213  ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I’m literally American living in the United States 💀

    • @fastpenguin
      @fastpenguin ปีที่แล้ว +3

      💀

  • @pwcrabb5766
    @pwcrabb5766 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love to mumble. Best to drift each sentence down to inauditability.