5 Unbridled Romanticism - Fichte, Schelling, & Symbols (Isaiah Berlin 1965)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 พ.ค. 2024
  • Isaiah Berlin gives the 5th lecture in a series of 6 on Romanticism and its roots.
    All 6 lectures: • Romanticism - Isaiah B...
    For Berlin, the Romantics set in motion a vast, unparalleled revolution in humanity’s view of itself. They destroyed the traditional notions of objective truth and validity in ethics with incalculable, all-pervasive results. As he said of the Romantics elsewhere: “The world has never been the same since, and our politics and morals have been deeply transformed by them. Certainly this has been the most radical, and indeed dramatic, not to say terrifying, change in men’s outlook in modern times.”
    In these brilliant lectures Berlin surveys the myriad attempts to define Romanticism, distills its essence, traces its developments from its first stirrings to its apotheosis, and shows how its lasting legacy permeates our own outlook. Combining the freshness and immediacy of the spoken word with Berlin’s inimitable eloquence and wit, the lectures range over a cast of the greatest thinkers and artists of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, including Kant, Rousseau, Diderot, Schiller, Schlegel, Novalis, Goethe, Blake, Byron, and Beethoven. Berlin argues that the ideas and attitudes held by these and other figures helped to shape twentieth-century nationalism, existentialism, democracy, totalitarianism, and our ideas about heroic individuals, individual self-fulfillment, and the exalted place of art. This is the record of an intellectual bravura performance-of one of the century’s most influential philosophers dissecting and assessing a movement that changed the course of history. These Mellon lectures were delivered in Washington in 1965.
    00:00 Three Great Trends
    00:50 Fichte
    09:58 Schelling
    16:02 Symbolism
    21:44 Depth
    26:33 Nostalgia
    31:07 Paranoia
    37:13 French Revolution
    #Romanticism #IsaiahBerlin #Fichte

ความคิดเห็น • 19

  • @Philosophy_Overdose
    @Philosophy_Overdose  2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    00:00 Three Great Trends
    00:50 Fichte
    09:58 Schelling
    16:02 Symbolism
    21:44 Depth
    26:33 Nostalgia
    31:07 Paranoia
    37:13 French Revolution

  • @robertrinehart9461
    @robertrinehart9461 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This was a man with a truly first class brain. It is wonderful to hear these lectures, to enjoy the vast breadth of his knowledge and to marvel at the clarity of his insight.

  • @neilmacdonald6637
    @neilmacdonald6637 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    this lecture series is sooo goood

  • @jdzentrist8711
    @jdzentrist8711 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It was ;his friend Jacobi, who warned the great Fichte, that he was going to get in trouble (lose his means of livelihood) if he persisted in teaching these ideas as if God no longer really existed. Indeed a contemporary, Moses Mendelssohn, had referred to the great one, Kant, as the "great destroyer" (of the tradition of belief in God). For Kant, God, Freedom and Immortality had become mere "postulates of the practical reason." We may, and really should, act AS IF these concepts exist, but we really cannot demonstrate (with our reason) that they actually do have demonstrable merit. Thus, with Fichte, building upon Kant, the notion of self-assertion, "positing," becomes paramount. The will becomes paramount, not reason. Nature is no longer the "standard," as it had been for the ancients. Now, the HUMAN WILL is the alpha and the omega, the standard of meaning for life. It is no wonder then that Kant, who started all this in a systematic way, is nowadays referred to by philosophers and thinkers as the "inventor of MAN."

  • @eucariote79
    @eucariote79 ปีที่แล้ว

    okay. thanks!

  • @Catholictomherbert
    @Catholictomherbert 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Yaaaaaay

  • @fuanon3441
    @fuanon3441 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @52:25 the transformative (nature?what?) of everything into everything? i couldn't hear him

    • @Philosophy_Overdose
      @Philosophy_Overdose  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He said: "The transformability of everything into everything".

    • @fuanon3441
      @fuanon3441 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Philosophy_Overdose ty

  • @nicolasruiz4643
    @nicolasruiz4643 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    49:00

  • @djewelbenz4316
    @djewelbenz4316 ปีที่แล้ว

    ال(( انا )) تحجب نفسها عن نفسها بأضعاف الحجب التي تضعها فيما بينها والعالم ،او بينها وبين ما،( ليس نفسها. ) ذلك ان ال( الانا ) هادمة لكل ماسواها ،هادمة لكل ما ( ليس نفسها ) ...انها لا تقبل ان يوجد معها سواها ..انها لايمكن ان تريد غير نفسها ...ال( انا ) ...فعل قتل وهدم وتدمير .....لهذا لاتتوقف عن وضع الحجب ( ليس حجابا واحدا ...بل سبع حجب نورانية وسبع حجب ظلامية ) ..وذلك هو كل مايمكنها فعله كي لاتشرع في ......قالت الملائكة عن ادم انه (( مفسد وسفاك ) اي ...غير قابل للمشاركة الوجودية ....انها افضل من قدم تعريفا ل( الانا ) قبل ظهور هذه الانا ........السوليبسيسم ....ماهو هذا ان لم يكن هو عجز الذات عن انكار ضرورتها الباطنة ؟

  • @jdzentrist8711
    @jdzentrist8711 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't know if Schellng himself used the word, "paranoia." Instead, I think he may have used the word, "melancholy." Melancholy is, as it were, for Schelling, an aspect of existence itself. And I didn't hear Berlin use the word, "evil." But I think it was the Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy article on Schelling ...that commented with words to the effect, no, more than that, that Schelling as a pessimist believed that evil was a thing in its own right, and not merely a "departure" from the GOOD. For Schelling, I had the impression, there is GOOD, even a kind of biblical good; but "God" has an equal, evil. So, had Schelling been influenced by "Paradise Lost"? At any rate, this kind of "Romanticism" it is clear, can and does give rise to what we call "Satanism," to the "religion" of Satanism. People to this day, starting in youth, look around, notice these very "real" terrors and "conspiracies," and decide, "If you can't beat it, join it." The become worshipers of the DEVIL One source of this "sensibility" is incest.

    • @grubfoot5707
      @grubfoot5707 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I'm curious what do you mean by "Satanism"?

  • @cliffpinchon2832
    @cliffpinchon2832 ปีที่แล้ว

    great content, bad delivery...

  • @nicolasruiz4643
    @nicolasruiz4643 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    52:00