3 The True Fathers of Romanticism (Isaiah Berlin 1965)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Isaiah Berlin gives the 3rd lecture in a series of 6 on Romanticism and its roots.
    All 6 lectures: • Romanticism - Isaiah B...
    For Berlin, the Romantics set in motion a vast, unparalleled revolution in humanity’s view of itself. They destroyed the traditional notions of objective truth and validity in ethics with incalculable, all-pervasive results. As he said of the Romantics elsewhere: “The world has never been the same since, and our politics and morals have been deeply transformed by them. Certainly this has been the most radical, and indeed dramatic, not to say terrifying, change in men’s outlook in modern times.”
    In these brilliant lectures Berlin surveys the myriad attempts to define Romanticism, distills its essence, traces its developments from its first stirrings to its apotheosis, and shows how its lasting legacy permeates our own outlook. Combining the freshness and immediacy of the spoken word with Berlin’s inimitable eloquence and wit, the lectures range over a cast of the greatest thinkers and artists of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, including Kant, Rousseau, Diderot, Schiller, Schlegel, Novalis, Goethe, Blake, Byron, and Beethoven. Berlin argues that the ideas and attitudes held by these and other figures helped to shape twentieth-century nationalism, existentialism, democracy, totalitarianism, and our ideas about heroic individuals, individual self-fulfillment, and the exalted place of art. This is the record of an intellectual bravura performance-of one of the century’s most influential philosophers dissecting and assessing a movement that changed the course of history. These Mellon lectures were delivered in Washington in 1965.
    00:00 Hamann & Others
    29:10 Herder
    #Philosophy #Romanticism #IsaiahBerlin

ความคิดเห็น • 28

  • @jakecarlo9950
    @jakecarlo9950 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    My god this is good. I don’t mind being so corny as to tell P.O. how genuinely important to my basic sanity, and hopes even, this channel has become. Your work is outstanding and to me at least crucial. Thanks, keep ‘er going.

  • @evinnra2779
    @evinnra2779 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Just wishing that all who aspired to create a global community of mankind would hear this lecture first. One can not govern what one can not understand, and to understand is to allow for the freedom of that , which is governed.

  • @clumsydad7158
    @clumsydad7158 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Herder's concept (via Hamann) of the integral nature of culture/language to meaning anticipates Wittgenstein's ultimate conclusion that meaning only exists temporally within language/cultures by those using it, and can only be understood to have meaning inside its own specific milieu/context

    • @Myndir
      @Myndir 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes. The parallel between Herder's idea of organically developed social artifacts and the ideas of Adam Ferguson is also interesting. Ferguson argued that society was the product of human action but not human design. Hence, the social order has a natural (not divine) origin, but there was no Solon or Hammurabi who was the originator of society.

    • @clumsydad7158
      @clumsydad7158 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Myndir that is interesting, i'll have to take a look at Ferguson. something I found recently are the thoughts of Pierre Klossowski, on unconscious drives shaping social reality, and even that "economic production is a mechanism of the psychic production of desires" ... much to ponder

  • @user-we2qv1cx6x
    @user-we2qv1cx6x 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very interesting. Went much deeper into a subject that had caught my eye previously. I found Hamann through Kierkegaard, who I read often.

  • @joenobody8997
    @joenobody8997 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So good💕

  • @rustyshimstock8653
    @rustyshimstock8653 ปีที่แล้ว

    Magnificent!

  • @Gorboduc
    @Gorboduc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Checking dates it seems Rousseau was ahead of Hamann by a nose:
    Rousseau's Discourse on Inequality 1755
    Hamann's religious conversion 1758
    Hamann's Socratic Memorabilia 1759
    Hamann's Aesthetics In A Nutshell 1760
    Rousseau's Julie 1761
    Rousseau's Emile 1762
    Who made the first splash among the cognoscenti is a different question...

    • @jmcknight00
      @jmcknight00 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Not sure why this is relevant since Berlin interprets Rousseau as Rationalist (not Romantic).

  • @clumsydad7158
    @clumsydad7158 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    fun and brilliant ... love german idealism, and all the 'spirit' of such missing in today's world

    • @firstal3799
      @firstal3799 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      German idealism is the stupidest philosophy invented

  • @thallesvinicius2729
    @thallesvinicius2729 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    38:34---A partir daí, certas conclusões românticas se seguem

  • @thallesvinicius2729
    @thallesvinicius2729 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    41:12----Isso veio a ser, portanto, o início de toda a noção de
    historicismo

  • @LuigiSimoncini
    @LuigiSimoncini ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic lecture. Luckily there’s his book to follow along the speech because Berlin bumbles at times

  • @thallesvinicius2729
    @thallesvinicius2729 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    27:47-----No entanto, houve dois homens que foram,
    em minha opinião, os verdadeiros pais do Romantismo.

  • @thallesvinicius2729
    @thallesvinicius2729 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    23:12----Se examinarmos as peças teatrais

  • @thallesvinicius2729
    @thallesvinicius2729 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    29:49

  • @jdzentrist8711
    @jdzentrist8711 ปีที่แล้ว

    Leo Strauss & Isaiah Berlin: The Hedgehog and the Fox

    • @jdzentrist8711
      @jdzentrist8711 ปีที่แล้ว

      But we should remember: Berlin did not mean any great theory here--he was basically just playing around. At least, that is what he claimed, after people started "taking seriously" his "essay," "The Hedgehog and the Fox."

    • @OnePost909
      @OnePost909 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Berlin was fox AND hedgehog, a rare animal indeed.

  • @longcastle4863
    @longcastle4863 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When someone starts talking about the voice of God within a culture or a nation there needs to be a spaghetti-armed creature emerging from the corners going danger danger.

  • @firstal3799
    @firstal3799 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Reading too much into things. Not everyone is aware of thinks of Universe as a whole. Or in a 'system ' fashion.

  • @urrescos
    @urrescos ปีที่แล้ว

    Romansticism as reliigous crap.

  • @thallesvinicius2729
    @thallesvinicius2729 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    25:18