Site-Lock Fees Are Making Campers Angry!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 พ.ค. 2024
  • Use code RVMILES for 25% off your next RV Mattress from Brooklyn Bedding at rvmattress.com/rvmiles, or get 35% off through the end of May!
    Of all the fees campgrounds and RV resorts charge, there's one that has lots of folks really annoyed - the fee to guarantee a specific site number, better known as the site-lock fee.
    *****
    Become a Mile Marker Member and support this content. Learn more at RVMiles.com/milemarkers
    Subscribe to the NEW RV Miles Podcast Channel: / rvmilespodcast .
    ******************************
    Connect with RV Miles:
    RV Miles Facebook Group: / rvmiles
    Shop the RV Miles Amazon Store: www.amazon.com/shop/rvmiles
    RV Miles Mailing List: rvmiles.com/mailinglist
    Mile Marker Membership: rvmiles.com/milemarkers
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 451

  • @lilricky2515
    @lilricky2515 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Running a campground, we have a reservation fee of $25 which either gets applied to the site charge or refunded to the customer once they arrived. This $25 fee allows you to select an available site, which is shown to you once you give us the days needed. This helps eliminates the RVers that like to reserve several different campgrounds and abandon reservations.

    • @LeeHawkinsPhoto
      @LeeHawkinsPhoto หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I’m surprised the $25 is enough to deter this. I feel like national and state parks near expensive metros have too many wealthy campers who would easily spend a few hundred dollars to choose at the last minute, and they won’t care one iota if half a dozen campsites go unused because of them. I know this would be bad for a private business, but for public campgrounds, I’d like to see a bigger stick used-like banning reservations from no-shows for two years. They can get first come first served sites if they wanna play that way and prevent enjoyment of a public asset.

  • @jaredmathews2983
    @jaredmathews2983 หลายเดือนก่อน +70

    Reminds me of these hotels that call them selves resorts. They will advertise the room rate at $69 per night, but in the fine print it indicates there is a mandatory valet parking fee of $15/day, a mandatory newspaper fee of $4/day, a mandatory resort services fee of $25/day, a mandatory cleaning fee of $17/day, etc. Shysters!

    • @donnakirk215
      @donnakirk215 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      What a shoddy way to run a business.

    • @johnlynch5221
      @johnlynch5221 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Then they expect a tip.

    • @docgiggles130
      @docgiggles130 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Every casino in Las Vegas now does this. $45 resort fee is the starting at the cheap casinos and goes higher from there. The only free parking is in the off season and only if you are staying at that casino. So if you say that you will try to save a few bucks by eating at the buffets, well, you are out of luck because the buffets are mostly gone too. All you have are over priced restaurants.

    • @flaminraymin8
      @flaminraymin8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@johnlynch5221 LOL!

    • @gerryhemmer1573
      @gerryhemmer1573 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@johnlynch5221 Problem is the hired help is not the cause, so if you do not tip them, you are hurting workers that have nothing to do with company's policies.

  • @brodyswisher8199
    @brodyswisher8199 หลายเดือนก่อน +86

    Good video. I manage a campground with over 100 sites. Over the last two years, we tested out offering a site lock feature just to see how it went. In 2022 we charged $25 to lock the site and we were shocked at how many folks signed up for that. That season was very difficult for all the reasons Jason described and more because our campground grid was completely "locked up".
    In 2023, we increased the site lock fee to $50, thinking that such a ridiculously high fee amount would significantly decrease the number of folks utilizing the feature. It did, but we were again shocked by the sheer number of folks locking their sites. It was approaching 50% of reservations. Good for revenue, but again, this made it difficult to run the campground. There are a lot of things that can happen in addition to what Jason described such as mechanical or medical issues preventing a guest from vacating a specific site.
    This year - we got rid of the site lock fee altogether! Now when you select a site on our map, a pop-up appears alerting the user that we will attempt to place them in their preferred site on a "best-effort" basis and that your selected site "is not guaranteed". ~98% of our guests check-in to the site that they originally selected.

    • @luvRVing
      @luvRVing หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      And this is why I would camp there!!! Nuf said!!!!

    • @scottmichaels6854
      @scottmichaels6854 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That's the thing though, so many RVers want that guarantee! They don't seem to understand that a great RV site is in high demand, by not just them. That's great that you have the ability to either charge a site fee or not, but these corporate campgrounds can't adjust their policies on the fly. I think saying "we'll do our best" works for campgrounds that are individually owned but these larger campgrounds have to have firm policies in place because they have a larger and often more demanding clientele.

    • @jordancook1668
      @jordancook1668 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      So you stopped screwing your customers. Good. You never should have done it in the first place and eliminating the fee tells me you know it.

    • @brodyswisher8199
      @brodyswisher8199 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@jordancook1668 That's the thing. Now that we aren't doing the site lock fee anymore - effectively it is the same as everyone selecting "No" to the site lock option in check-out.
      We were NOT just pocketing the money from the site lock fee. If someone locked their site, we would move heaven and earth to get them that site. Here's a scenario:
      It is shoulder season, May. We are at ~50% occupancy - lots of available sites. You are staying in spot 27 and on the last day of your reservation you stop by the front desk to inquire about staying an additional night. We say sorry your site is unavailable because the incoming guest locked their site. So now, your only option to stay is to pack up your entire setup just to move it 30 feet.
      That type of scenario is why we eliminated the site lock feature.
      I guess some people are offended that we would even offer the site lock feature as an option. While others are upset that we took it away and no longer have a way to guarantee sites. You can please some people, some of the time. We're just going to keep on running the campground as we feel best :)

    • @ronrothrock7116
      @ronrothrock7116 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      I'm curious why you say it is harder to manage a campground when people choose their specific site. I've been a park ranger for government campgrounds and either they were first come first serve or they were reserve specific site. None of this reserve a site and it gets chosen on that day. The reserve a specific site was not difficult at all to manage, so I would like to know why you say that was "harder" when my experience was that it was actually pretty easy.

  • @gdt5430
    @gdt5430 หลายเดือนก่อน +79

    We recently got sucked into this site lock crap, we were going to a completely unknown "resort" so we paid the site lock fee of $25.00 several months in advance. When we got to the resort it was empty, we could have picked any site for the eight days and been fine. This is a hustle, I let the resort know we will never be back.

    • @ski3435
      @ski3435 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Watch the video again. Understand that the revenue generated from site lock fees pales in comparison to the extra revenue generated by the flexibility a campground has to switch you to a different site in order to boost their occupancy rate.

    • @danielhurst8863
      @danielhurst8863 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      It is not as if anyone can see the future and know that weekend will be empty. You paid to lock in a specific site, so you didn't have to worry about if that site was going to be available when you got there.

    • @markm5287
      @markm5287 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Typical entitled attitude, and you didn't watch the video. You certainly didn't watch the campground maps during the months leading up to your trip or you would have known it was empty... by the same toke, you ran the risk of ONE other person wanting your site, and you wouldn't have had it without the lock. Sometimes it a roll of the dice, and rolling dice isn't free.

  • @tide4113
    @tide4113 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    I never forget to leave a real review that includes all the good and bad to help fellow RVers to avoid those places

  • @timf6916
    @timf6916 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

    Yes, the mom & Pop are doing this. It was done to me last week. I didn’t do it, and they did move me to a different spot when I checked in. I did stay with them for 5 nights. The day I left I told them that that was wrong, the site I book was empty the hole time. I will put that in my review.

    • @garretlewis4103
      @garretlewis4103 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      That sounds like dirty pool. Don’t pay the fee, don’t get the site whether anyone else needed it or not.

    • @markjones3301
      @markjones3301 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Yes they move you out of spite

    • @flaminraymin8
      @flaminraymin8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I wonder what an attorney would think about that? hmmmmmmmmmmm

    • @jameswfreedom641
      @jameswfreedom641 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      You should definitely link to your review

    • @Robynhoodlum
      @Robynhoodlum หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@flaminraymin8nothing. It’s not illegal as long as you still get the TYPE of site you paid for. If you don’t pay the fee, you don’t get the guarantee. You can be moved for any reason, including spite. It’s not fair, but it IS legal.

  • @alanjohnson2853
    @alanjohnson2853 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Wow! Hearing about this kind of stuff makes me glad that we mostly boondock, and rarely use a campground or RV park

    • @markm5287
      @markm5287 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Boondocking is the best!

  • @truneilson
    @truneilson หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    This is like the aggressive tip request before you get any services. I just stop spending any money at that place.

  • @EarlAlvinDaniels
    @EarlAlvinDaniels หลายเดือนก่อน +89

    Bake in the fee up front in the basic site cost. Allow people to pick their site for no extra cost. Then give them a discount if they check the box "allow me to be moved to accommodate other reservations." Win-win.
    I'm a boondocker, so have no dog in this fight.

    • @michaelschaefer5014
      @michaelschaefer5014 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      What happens when you bake it in the cake and still don't get the site you wanted. Keeping it an option is best.

    • @tryharder3214
      @tryharder3214 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Wanted to suggest this. "Looking to save 10$? Allow us to pick an equal site for you and enjoy your reward" (or give them big bundle of firewood for equal price or something like 15$ of on site bonus like shower use\laundry\soda machine you name it. This way camp will keep profits and grow.

    • @qazwiz
      @qazwiz หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      good idea but most search engines list prices and a $20/day plus $30 lock vs a $50 minus $30 "no preference " discount are same thing but lock fee listing shows up first page whil things costing 150% more are page 3 if lucky. (not to mention the multiple day stay is lopsided between lock fee on 3day vs 30 day

    • @ski3435
      @ski3435 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I don't think so. As Jason said, campgrounds would rather have the flexibility to move you so they can increase their occupancy rate. That flexibility will generate more revenue than the paltry site lock fees.

  • @curiouspenguin6887
    @curiouspenguin6887 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    People who hog the reservation systems ruined it for everyone. Last time we went we got the last "available " site, only to find only 1/4 of the campsites actually being used! Nobody ever showed up for their reservations. Meanwhile we were stuck with a crappy site!

    • @mamabar6811
      @mamabar6811 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Yeah that system is messed up and needs to remedied. Holiday weekends should be non-refundable if not canceled 14 days in advance for a full refund, 7 days for 50%. That would help ALOT.

    • @gus24seven
      @gus24seven หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      People can't be bothered to plan ahead. Maybe they will go camping this weekend. Maybe they got off work Friday and decide they don't want to go. If they did go and didn't have a reserved spot, they might not get one at all. People who can make a commitment should be inconvenienced so the indecisive can be catered to.😂😂😂

    • @mamabar6811
      @mamabar6811 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@gus24seven why do you assume the OP was a ‘last minute’ camper? We have had several instances where we booked a state campsite months in advance and because my fingers weren’t quick enough when the system opened at 8:00 am, I got a less than ideal spot. And then we show up and see a bunch of empty sites. It’s infuriating. Barring some sort of emergency or illness, people shouldn’t be able to cancel last minute and leave an empty site open for a peak weekend to not be enjoyed by someone else. There should be a system in place that if they aren’t penalized with a fee, they should be able to transfer the site to someone else via a reservation marketplace if some sort.

    • @curiouspenguin6887
      @curiouspenguin6887 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @gus24seven FYI, we made a reservation weeks in advance and the place was already booked by no show campers.

    • @curiouspenguin6887
      @curiouspenguin6887 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @mamabar6811 Correct. Advance reservations won't save you from the no shows who already hogged the system.

  • @Thfeyhvfdetyhbvcd
    @Thfeyhvfdetyhbvcd หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    EXCELLENT video! You clearly explained both sides of the argument in a fair and unbiased way, while condemning the questionable if not unethical use of site locks by some campgrounds.

  • @betsymiller2590
    @betsymiller2590 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I just don't pay it. What really irked me was beeing charged the "reservation fee" while I was standing in the office watching her check me in on a last minute stop.

  • @jjones5424
    @jjones5424 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I am at a campground right now in Colorado, where I booked 7 nights, and the website gave me an option to pay $3.00 per night to pick a particular site. I did that, and yesterday, I went to the office to extend our stay by 3 more days. The clerk said no problem, you can stay on your site, "and I'll just move a few things around." I'm sure that I paid the additional fee per night again, but I wanted our door side to face an open space and not another camper, so it was worth it to me.

  • @jackiehorn3724
    @jackiehorn3724 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    For me, campground fees in certain parts of the country have taken their rates up so much, yet service has gone down. It’s not that I expect that much service, I actually prefer to be left alone when out camping. But I travel in a 21 foot class b. So many times I get booted from the site I chose and put into some obscure area where it is ultra unlevel because the site pad has broken up, may have a rotten falling apart picnic table , and the firepit full of trash. And the site ignored because it’s in a remote area of the rv resort. I have to back in at very odd angles. At one koa my sliding glass door was right up against some trees. I could barely fit to get out. So prices going up and up. But quality and services going down. And by the way, when this has happened to me, I have never been given a discounted rate for being put into the dump site because of my small easy to maneuver rig. I am charged the same just like the 14:27 original site I reserved, and meanwhile the other campers I came with were all in their campsites all near each other as we had originally reserved as a group. If I am paying same rate as the big style rigs, I should be given same quality of site.

  • @sssophiesmom
    @sssophiesmom หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I only camp in state campgrounds.
    A long long time ago before the internet age of booking campgrounds, we would send our paper form in along with a list of our specific site choices. We would send a list of at least 20 site numbers. It was first processed first choice. You could not postmark before Jan 1st. We would wait a couple months to find out which sites we got.
    Then when they switched to online and/or phone reservations it changed to 11 months in advance that you could reserve. The nice thing is we could then know which sites were available and immediately book that site.
    No extra charge. I cannot fathom arriving at the campground to be told oh we moved you.... Uh what?
    I have a notebook with every single site listed. I have over half if them rated for MY needs. I like privacy. I also need it big enough to fit my trailer and my sisters tent and screen tent.
    Even when i camp alone with my dog, I want the site that I chose for whichever reason I chose.
    Thankfully the state campground has never attempted to move people around unless a site was closed due to somethimg like a tree falling over.
    This is one reason I have never camped in a private campground. And I never intend to either.
    Those campgrounds are just not my style. I dont want to be able to reach out and touch my neigbors trailer.
    I will also never camp at a "resort" give me nature and trees and peace and quiet, and a good lake to swim in.

    • @TheWestlandgirl
      @TheWestlandgirl หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You sound exactly like my husband and me. 😊

    • @churchofpos2279
      @churchofpos2279 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Same here. will not use a resort campground either. Having all those people around and packed in like sardines- might as well park at Walmart for free.

    • @LeeHawkinsPhoto
      @LeeHawkinsPhoto หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’m with you…unfortunately a lot of places are getting abused with no-shows. People will book half a dozen campgrounds and then choose at the last minute. Then huge swaths of campsites sit empty in the hottest national and state parks because a few hundred bucks is just pocket change to these people. I’m fine with people having that kind of money, but I’m not fine with them taking much more than their fair share only to waste it so nobody else can enjoy it. That’s why in a lot of ways I’m glad that some parks like Yellowstone don’t book specific sites. If I can find 3 days of camping in the same site at the last minute, I’m super glad for that. I’ve had to cobble together 5 days at Yosemite and it’s a huge pain booking it and moving around. In places like that, I’m just happy not to have to wait in line or drive extra to get into the park, I don’t care as much about which site I get.
      But I’m also not saying that I don’t like to pick my site. I definitely prefer to be able to do that. But in some places, I care way more about just getting in…I don’t care which site I get. Sometimes you don’t have the ability to book months in advance.

    • @sssophiesmom
      @sssophiesmom หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @LeeHawkinsPhoto I agree with the whole no show thing. I think if you don't show up after 24 hrs and don't cancel then they should open up that site AND keep all fees and a penalty.
      I go to the same place all the time. I am there rain or shine. I have heard booking places like Yellowstone etc is a nightmare.

    • @LeeHawkinsPhoto
      @LeeHawkinsPhoto หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sssophiesmom I think Yellowstone is the easiest simply because Xanterra doesn’t let you choose your site. Yosemite Valley is the true nightmare…it’s really a pain to cobble together more than 1-2 nights unless you book the day the reservation window opens or you’re willing to change sites frequently.changing sites can be a massive pain. It’s SO much easier to deal with Yellowstone.

  • @mireilledionne218
    @mireilledionne218 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    If a campground manager believes that all sites within a category are equivalent, he is wrong
    You mentioned a lot of reasons why people would select a specific site. On top of that I would add, sunny, partially sunny or shadow.

    • @TimCatZ
      @TimCatZ หลายเดือนก่อน

      exactly..all sites of same category are not created equally.

    • @pgithens1
      @pgithens1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Correct. 50 amp and full hookups on a flat site is not the same as one that takes monumental effort or that is impossible to level on.

  • @bretmusser5468
    @bretmusser5468 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    Simple solution: after booking, just ask, "Want a $5 discount? Let us move you to an equivalent site and allow us to accommodate other RV'ers." People love saving money as much as they hate paying fees.

    • @allenellzey5735
      @allenellzey5735 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I was telling my wife something very similar. Price the sites as $$ per night, but we pick where you will be or $$$ per night and you pick. Cruise lines do this all the time. If the spot I want is available when I make my booking don't add a fee to make sure I get what your system says is available. All for a cancelation fee.

  • @LoneWolf1985BK
    @LoneWolf1985BK หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    State campgrounds you pick your site and there’s no “site lock” fee. I’ve never been moved off the site I pick. I did run into a couple private campgrounds in Maine that had this option. I take into account slope and location of site. I don’t want to get flooded out while in my spot.

  • @timwoody3835
    @timwoody3835 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I knew
    KOA haS this but wasn’t sure how exactly it worked so I went to their app and looked at the booking page. You book the site and pay the price listed on the page. If you want a specific site there is a spot to ‘Select my site’ which will give you a page that has a listing of the AVAILABLE sites of the type you are requesting. The charge is $25. If you want to select your site this seems to be a fair way to do it. Price to select is up front, not too onerous, not hidden and also not required.

  • @ronrothrock7116
    @ronrothrock7116 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I can see 2 ways to improve that reservation experience. 1 says right up front what the cost is for the different sites and there is a distinction for specific site reservation. Another, which I like, is go through the process of choosing your site and then at the end offer a DISCOUNT to allow the campground to move you to a comparable site if it is needed. People like discounts! They don't like additional fees. So start off with the higher rate and offer that discount option.

  • @HappyCamper1992
    @HappyCamper1992 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I absolutely refuse to stay at any park that charges site lock fees or has the 10 year rule. My unit is only a few years old but refuse to promote any BS policy

  • @CaptConfusion71
    @CaptConfusion71 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Hmmmm...I can always pick my site in my preferred state parks, no site lock fee required. Guess I'll stick with what works.

    • @sparkeyjames
      @sparkeyjames หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes but does your 40 foot RV diesel pusher fit in a state park spot and do you have to level it with a 1 foot high stack of boards (dangerous).

  • @michellewhite6692
    @michellewhite6692 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    This is like airline fees to choose your seat assignment.

    • @dynac8012
      @dynac8012 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Or cruise line fees to choose your cabin.

    • @scottmichaels6854
      @scottmichaels6854 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Supply and demand! The airlines charge for the better seats. We live on an overcrowded planet so if you want a premium seat or a premium RV spot, you have to pay more for it.

    • @blaintaylor9218
      @blaintaylor9218 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      10:33

  • @ADKMan
    @ADKMan หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ok, I understand the concept of these fees……let me tell you TWICE now we’ve paid the fee when gathering with family and they still moved us around. Last time we had one family member in a different part of the campground……time before ALL of us were moved. Both times they refused to refund the fee…. (At two different campgrounds) saying we still got a site with the requested hookups. This convinced me that this is nothing more than a money grab.

    • @mamabar6811
      @mamabar6811 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wow! That is completely unethical unless the fine print gives them a right to move you to a comparable site category.

  • @amidala3927
    @amidala3927 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    On the flip side, there's a few state campsites right near us that we've been trying to stay at over a weekend all year, but, because you book a specific spot, we can't get in. Plenty of spots are available on Friday or Saturday or Sunday, but never the same site two nights in a row.

  • @jotownzer473
    @jotownzer473 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I call BS on the site locked fee Jason. I have stayed in parts before where I had to move sites because of a reservation in order to stay my intended time. Sometimes you might have to move twice during a week. Just part of it since I didn't make reservations early enough. Parks can still fill in the park without having to move people from there reserved spots and not charge extra. I boondock almost entirely these days because parks are already ridiculously over priced.

  • @rubbertoad3681
    @rubbertoad3681 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    We camp host at an RV Park that is open for 4 months in the summer. Our park made less than $100 in lock fees last year. It is not a cash grab. Parks need the ability to move people around to maximize their spots, otherwise a lot of RVers are left out in the cold. For the few that have to have a specific spot, and don’t want to be part of a flexible system that benefits all RVers at some point, they have that ability to lock their spot.

  • @vivoutdoors
    @vivoutdoors หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    If I book a site, I want that site. When a campground can guarantee that I will have the same amount of shade or sun, and that ALL sites are the same size (width and depth) and the same view as the site I've chosen when making a reservation then they can move me around. Otherwise I book elsewhere. Every venue is getting Fee Happy. My yard is looking pretty good these days!

  • @Harp4Hand
    @Harp4Hand หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Wow, thank you from explaining this so well. I was pretty cranky when I first heard of this, but you presented both sides in such an articulate way.

  • @cirrus820travelers9
    @cirrus820travelers9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Back in the day, wow! 10-20 yrs already, a group of us traveled to a common destination and preferred sites along side each other. Was hit & miss, and we didn't care as we could meet up at different sites. Being near a bath with noisy doors was terrible problem, slamming 24/7. Site size & cleanliness (overgrown TREES/SHRUBS!) were more important. We also avoided being near dumpsters. Especially when a truck empties it before dawn. Yup, we've become "those old people" enjoying peace & tranquility with our grandkids. 😊 And we educate them rv etiquette reminding them they, too, will someday be old fuddy-duddies!

  • @RVlivingcoast2coast
    @RVlivingcoast2coast หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    We've been RV Camping for well over a decade, but we prefer the more natural environments of the National, State, and Country parks, which have always allowed campers to pick their specific site with no extra fees. We only default to private RV parks when there aren't other options.

    • @delaynerulo6287
      @delaynerulo6287 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I love that to but it’s almost impossible to get into state and national parks.

  • @MaryWehmeier
    @MaryWehmeier หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Many people want a specific site in order to access things they need. But it always feels scammie to me.

    • @scottmichaels6854
      @scottmichaels6854 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Most people want a site that they've had before. It's supply and demand. If the site is great then you're not the only one who thinks it's great. An overcrowded planet means that you have to pay more for premium sites.

    • @j.l.salayao8055
      @j.l.salayao8055 หลายเดือนก่อน

      God bless America 🇺🇸 🎉

  • @kevinsterner9490
    @kevinsterner9490 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Good video. Thanks for explaining the site lock situation. That explains why Mather Campground at the Grand Canyon has so many empty spots even when they say they say they are full . At least that’s my guess. They don’t charge a site lock fee but you pick your own site

  • @TraederPhoto
    @TraederPhoto หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    From a business stand point I can understand this, Campgrounds could also turn this around and offer a discount for the guest if they are flexible with what site you get. I discount always sounds better to the guest than an addition fee.

  • @ricktripp6098
    @ricktripp6098 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    reservations in general suck.... many rvers will reserve multiple spots at different places then only use 1.... if any fees.. reservations should have a non refundable fee at time of reservation that applies to spot... this would allow more of us to have better chance at getting a spot

  • @windrider65
    @windrider65 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    If you get to choose your site on the website, then no extra fees. If there is a site lock fee it should be on the main page of the website!
    I understand that they want to keep the sites open for moving people around, it should be shown upfront.

  • @pjcd7016
    @pjcd7016 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    This is why I avoid private campgrounds

    • @garretlewis4103
      @garretlewis4103 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeap, us too. State parks, National Forest, National Park, etc. are our choices and the only places we have stayed the past several years. Of course some of those places are becoming privately run. If you can do it, boondocking is the best.

    • @wheninrome42
      @wheninrome42 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      glorified parking lots, no idea why people pay such a premium for them

    • @garretlewis4103
      @garretlewis4103 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@wheninrome42 Some of them definitely are for sure!

  • @amymc505
    @amymc505 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you for the conversation, we need to push back where we can on junk fees.

  • @jimfaber1443
    @jimfaber1443 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This option upgrade was offered to me in NC. I told my wife this was like the Seinfeld episode of taking the reservation but not keeping it. Camp at the site and the campground was empty with the only have the owners trailers there. Their website was on a five plus year plan with their amenities which most of them weren't even constructed yet. Plus they had a "bad weather" upgrade for an additional fee. One and done and not going back to that location

  • @Saintly2
    @Saintly2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I started seeing this and my goodness, $50 is SO much for something that was never a question before.

    • @sparkeyjames
      @sparkeyjames หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's like the concert tickets from TicketMaster. So many fee's baked in it's ridiculous.

  • @jams9705
    @jams9705 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    More and more fees are greedy money grabs just showing the state of humanity.

  • @lindacook6720
    @lindacook6720 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    We don’t need the additional fees no matter what they call it. And if I have a smaller rv I shouldn’t be shunted to the smallest site that costs the same as the longer ones but is nowhere near the same quality as them. If either of these happen, I book elsewhere

    • @ski3435
      @ski3435 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why should you hog a large site if a smaller site will fit your RV? You're costing the campground lost revenue from larger RVs.

  • @ord2mia
    @ord2mia หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The theater seats analogy is a good one.

  • @arnoldpainal5885
    @arnoldpainal5885 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    My thought is that if you paid for a site it should be locked in period. You should get what you paid for regardless of your vehicle's size. If I have a 20' and I pay for a 30' site it should be mine. The fees should be based on the size of the site. If I go in a restaurant as a couple and get sat at a 4 seat table they don't tell me to move when a party of 4 comes in.

    • @ski3435
      @ski3435 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      But if the restaurant expects to be busy you can bet you'll be steered to a two top not a four top!

    • @arnoldpainal5885
      @arnoldpainal5885 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@ski3435 Yes but they don't move you once you have been seated just like a they shouldn't make you move from one site to another just because someone else with a larger camper showed up. Especially of yo chose the site for a specific reason and prepaid for it.

    • @zephsmith3499
      @zephsmith3499 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@arnoldpainal5885 If you are seated at a given table, or checked in for a given site, we all agree that you should almost never be required to move.
      But in regard to reservations, an accurate analogy would be reserving in advance a (specific?) table for 4 when you actually only have a party of 2, and then expecting that you will be seated at that table when you arrive with your party of 2, not assigned a table at arrival.
      There is a reason you reserve restaurants by the number in the party, not by the table size (nor specific table).

    • @arnoldpainal5885
      @arnoldpainal5885 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@zephsmith3499 My wife and I always ask for the table of four seats in order to have enough room. One restaurant we go to a-regularly we reserve a specific table next to a fireplace that is a table for four. The restaurant knows we are requesting that table when we are only two people. If they aren't willing to comply with the request they shouldn't accept the reservation.
      Camping sites are very similar in that many people reserve a site for specific aspects of the site such as on the lake, near to or far from the bathrooms, secluded, etc.. The reservation shouldn't be taken if they aren't complying with the request just like my wife and my table choice at that restaurant.

    • @zephsmith3499
      @zephsmith3499 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@arnoldpainal5885 It's cool that you have the personal connection to a restaurant. I like that.
      However, in my lifetime I've made reservations at more restaurants than I could possibly count, around the country, and I've *never* been offered the option to reserve a table size independent of the number of people, so I don't think your great connection to that particular restaurant is very representative of the experience of the vast majority. I was speaking of the latter.
      If you have such a relationship to a particular campground, great! And if you choose not to patronize any campground which does not accommodate your preferences, that too is fully your choice. OK?
      I'm not taking a position on reserving a given site, with or without lock in fees. I was commenting on the relevance of the restaurant analogy to the site rental question, however one comes down on that issue.

  • @mendyviola
    @mendyviola หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I don’t get it. All the state parks I’ve been to operate solely on selecting a particular site, except for the few kept aside for “walk-ins”.

    • @valerierodger
      @valerierodger 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Because the government doesn’t have to worry about bringing in enough income from a campsite to stay afloat

  • @twodogsandtheirfamily
    @twodogsandtheirfamily หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Funny enough, we always try to book a campground that allows us to lock in a site. We stay away from those that don't, but sometimes it's unavoidable. Many KOAs still don't let you pick a site. But when given the choice, we always pick a campground where a lock is available. 🐾🐾

  • @Go4Corvette
    @Go4Corvette หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Glad that I am a nomad in a van with no debits. I only boondock, so I never need to deal with all this. Good luck with those fancy RV's and get ready to use your credit card more often.

    • @garretlewis4103
      @garretlewis4103 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Boondocking is the “ticket”. Unfortunately it isn’t as easy to do in certain places.

  • @lisamarengo8482
    @lisamarengo8482 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for explaining this so well!

  • @Timw927
    @Timw927 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I stayed at a campground near Bridgewater VA, at check in they told me to go pick a site and come back to pay when I was set up. That was nice, just drive around and pick a spot you want. I wish more campgrounds would do that. Only once did I pay a site lock fee and it wasn't needed as the campground wasn't half full!

  • @Euskaltel0526
    @Euskaltel0526 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent video. You did a great job explaining what this Lock is and both perspectives, the camper and RV park operator.

  • @rogerkern
    @rogerkern หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I had a place ask me that after taking a two month stay then they asked if I want to lock In? I just said no thank you and said I’ll go somewhere else.

  • @joedonbaker1673
    @joedonbaker1673 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Jason, another frustrating thing is people admitting that they overbook at a campground then cancel as needed. Example: A beach CG near us allows two week stays. People book 3 back to back stays using different family member names. They may either stay all 6 weeks or if they see the weather looking bad they'll cancel that stay last minute and still have 2 other chances.

  • @bertkelly7650
    @bertkelly7650 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    We stay at SP's. If they start charging site fees, Ima gonna quit camping.

    • @cirrus820travelers9
      @cirrus820travelers9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Many SP's have fees. Most common is for out of state visitors! Then a car fee, and/or second car. BTY, Florida doesn't! Was told by my state rep. it will hurt tourism. B.S. Users fees collected does not meet the SP budget. Us residents pay it! So when I travel to other states, we avoid Reserve.gov & any SP that "TAXES" us for not being a resident.

  • @rcheas4894
    @rcheas4894 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’ve full-timed for 15 years and work-camped for campgrounds. I understand the Tetris ability’s. Just allow us to pick sites or not and charge accordingly (no lock fees). Or offer us the option up front to select a site for a little more or take whatever assigned site the camp picks when I arrive for less $$$.

  • @wendywilliams9355
    @wendywilliams9355 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for explaining these fees to me. I have seen it recently, and I'm on the fence now about the fees. I like that I can just ignore the fee if I'm just stopping for an overnight, but I can see, in some cases, where it would be nice to know exactly where I will be staying for longer stays, or when I travel with friends and family.

  • @maryannbarrett5657
    @maryannbarrett5657 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Will not stay at a campground with this fee and let them know why !!!

  • @lyfandeth
    @lyfandeth หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    They've obviously studied the airlines, where you have to pay extra to book adjacent seats.
    The price may or may not seem reasonable, but all the nickel and diming just makes everyone angrier. And an angry society is not a healthy thing.
    Do remember to take the complimentary picnic table and fire ring when you leave😂.

    • @shumandaniele
      @shumandaniele หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What airline makes you do that? I've never seen that.

    • @navmarroaming2292
      @navmarroaming2292 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That might be why prices keep going up. Vandalism.

    • @michaelschaefer5014
      @michaelschaefer5014 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It isn't added to the price if you don't want it. It's an option not an added fee.

    • @TheCrazyMoparDude68
      @TheCrazyMoparDude68 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I have never had an airline charge me more to book adjacent seats.

    • @shumandaniele
      @shumandaniele หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Melody-pv4sg I have selected seats many times without having to pay extra. They do charge extra for "premium" seats (closer to the front, emergency exit seats with more legroom), but as long as you book early enough, you can simply select adjacent seats that don't have an upcharge. It seems like the situation you are describing is when just about everything is filled up and only upcharge middle seats are left?

  • @michaeldean3771
    @michaeldean3771 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Outdoor Adventures Michigan has implemented assigned sites vs first come first serve. With members able to book up to 3 week stays things get frustrating now. We get a lot of people that book weekends only and book up water front sites. Then there are a vast number of us that use our memberships to fullest and want to book our 3 week stays on the water but cannot do so. Water sites full Friday to Sunday and empty all week.

  • @francescampbell4731
    @francescampbell4731 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We no longer camp anymore, but when we did it was easy to reserve a specific site without paying a fee. We just had to reserve the site the previous year for the date desired with a non-refundable deposit. We reserved a site that had a concrete pad which was awesome when staying at a campground on the beach due to the sand our daughters brought in daily. For eight years in a row we camped at Ocean Lakes Family Campground in Myrtle Beach, SC. and reserved our site for the next year when we were checking out each time but never had to pay a fee, just a deposit which was applied to our stay the following visit.

  • @luvRVing
    @luvRVing หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I categorically REFUSE to pay the site lock fees. Especially in mid March when I and everyone there knows the campground is not going to fill up!

  • @larrylyons9032
    @larrylyons9032 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sun Outdoors wanted to charge me $35 to come in an hour early and the campground was wide open! The lady told me that no one was in the site! Total BS.

  • @teresawalker4492
    @teresawalker4492 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Recently made reservations for a week long stay at a camp we visited three times before. Prior visits, we did not pick our site, but
    ended up in the same spot. This time, our new travel trailer is 3 feet longer and requires 50 amps. At the end of the online reservation process, a $20 site lock fee was offered. We paid up because we were afraid upon arrival our site would be too short. Thank you for setting the record straight. We did not need to pay the fee to get an adequate site.

  • @zn6jr3847
    @zn6jr3847 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for your video. Really informative 😃

  • @timclosson7166
    @timclosson7166 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Havent experienced site lock fees, but the only part that made sense to me is moving your 20 ft camper to allow a longer rv to use your space. One of your best videos, always look forward to them!

    • @davenehilla9610
      @davenehilla9610 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not sure how that makes any sense at all given that the guy in the 20 foot RV is paying the exact same price for the camping spot that he chose based on many variables important to him. Often the little guy gets moved to a dinky spot to accommodate the bigger RV. Ask me how I know…..

  • @TheBlackLeprechaun
    @TheBlackLeprechaun หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ridiculous! It's the old "baggage fee on planes " game . But the RV version. Would you like sprinkles on your ice cream? Oh, that will cost you 10 cents. Have a nice day.

  • @navmarroaming2292
    @navmarroaming2292 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    People want extra convenience and guarantees, which takes personnel, but don't want to pay for it.

  • @toscatattertail9813
    @toscatattertail9813 หลายเดือนก่อน

    they had these when my parents were camping regularly in 1966- 71. These were for people with large trailers or Rv's, and they were well advertised at the main office. My parents would set a deposit for the next visit before they left the campground for the weekend. if they were going to be there for a week they would make the reservation 30 days in advance.
    There were also area's for reservations and area's that were first come first serve.

  • @FarisOutbound
    @FarisOutbound หลายเดือนก่อน

    Totally agree. I have been down that road with picking a site and at the final purchase there was a built in-lock fee buried in there. Paid it... but thought really! And there was an entrance fee on top of that when I pulled up to the gate of Stone Mountain Park in Georgia. Privately owned park money grab, that should be a state park.

  • @garretlewis4103
    @garretlewis4103 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    IF a campground wants to charge a site lock fee, they should be up front about it. Nobody likes surprises, especially when it is costing them money. Or, a bunch of time picking a spot that they like/want only to find out at the end it costs them extra.

  • @SconnyWandering
    @SconnyWandering หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Well you just did an excellent job explaining why airlines charge extra to pick a seat.

  • @DblIre
    @DblIre หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is why my "RV" is a sailboat. I always have a lake view, no close neighbors and can move whenever/wherever I wish. I have gotten some questions when I stop overnight when on the road. One campground manager didn't want to rent me a spot until I showed her I was self-contained like every other RV in the park.

  • @williammaitland216
    @williammaitland216 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So thankful we came up through the camping/rving years before Reservations. First and last reservation we made was double booked when we arrived....since we were the second one to be reserved the other people got the site. We never made another reservation since then,, and never will.

  • @robertburns5145
    @robertburns5145 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    Site lock fees are nothing but theft. I work camp at a campground in Virginia and we don’t do that. It’s absurd to treat customers that way!

    • @__WJK__
      @__WJK__ หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Couldn’t agree more & was going to mention that in my earlier post, but you beat me to it. I’ve camped extensively up and down the cost of Virginia & North Carolina & neither state takes greedy advantage of its customers like that.

    • @garretlewis4103
      @garretlewis4103 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Agreed!

    • @scottmichaels6854
      @scottmichaels6854 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Great RV sites are in high demand by EVERYONE! If you call asking for a specific site you should have to pay more. America is all about supply and demand. The more the demand, the higher the price. We're not a socialist country.

    • @__WJK__
      @__WJK__ หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@scottmichaels6854​​⁠- Nobody is arguing against capitalism,or about America being socialist. What people are getting tired of, are frivolous fees, on top of more frivolous fees. Those who’ve bought concert tickets from Ticketmaster over the years will totally get the point. It would be different if campgrounds were somehow being “putout” for saving the spot you want, but in reality, campgrounds have always been known to give you the spot you wanted, right when you booked it. So all that seems to have changed, is that some campgrounds are taking advantage of their customers by creating artificial fear that you might not get the spot you picked, unless you slip us some extra cash…rme/smh.

    • @j.l.salayao8055
      @j.l.salayao8055 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@scottmichaels6854God bless America 🇺🇸 🎉.

  • @robertosgood961
    @robertosgood961 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Well explained. I tend to agree with you the perception of tacking it on seems wrong. But rather at the beginning offering it as an added service you might wish to use is a better way to offer it. My wife and I don't like it at a campground in NY because it is mentioned at the end after you've chosen a site. We usually pay because we wish to be close to family that have a seasonal site there.

  • @chrisfoxwell4128
    @chrisfoxwell4128 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They could just make site choice tied to a certain number of nights. There have been plenty of sites I didn't want to be in and don't go back for fear of getting it again.

  • @dennisg.7498
    @dennisg.7498 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We used to go to the same campground every year on the weekend of an event. What they do is the site cost varies depending on what's going on that week. The site we got was $ 95 a night with a minimum of 2 or sometimes 3 nights non-refundable. The public was allowed to come in and get a day pass to use their swimming facilities at the same time, so it was packed just like going to a state fair. No site lock fee needed. They just charged for everything else once you were there.

  • @Thesaltymedic36
    @Thesaltymedic36 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great explanation 👍🏼 I understand why. I honestly don’t mind moving sites, every day if necessary but that’s me.

  • @jwall62
    @jwall62 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I started RVing in 2016, and have always been able to go to a website and select my site.

  • @rmccabe117
    @rmccabe117 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    what a fantastic video! Thanks so much!!!

    • @RVMiles
      @RVMiles  หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are so welcome!

  • @chicnwing4519
    @chicnwing4519 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Site lock fees are the first sign you are dealing with a shady campground

  • @rhotondm
    @rhotondm หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nothing pisses me off more than taking the time to book an available site then going into checkout to see a site lock fee.

  • @keithDaBest
    @keithDaBest หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I only stay at state parks, always pick my site and don’t pay site lock…. But I hate paying extra for electric for my tiny camper , same fee at a 50 am McMansion

    • @kimberlyferrier1312
      @kimberlyferrier1312 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’ve been irritated to not have the electricity work. Have been glad I had a power station. I will have to start arriving earlier to check things out.

  • @JMlovesDDM
    @JMlovesDDM หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Modern society ; selfish , entitled campers and greedy campground operators make things bad for everyone . RV parks , RV idealogy , RV TH-cam channels and on and on have all drastically shifted over the last few years , it's all about the money now . State and national camping and entrance fees have skyrocketed also . Nothing personal , but I am so sick of every somewhat popular RV TH-camr telling me what a great deal I'm getting by buying a $2000.00 plus mattress . Not in my budget for sure . The idea of full time RV living somewhat frugally as I do seems to have gone by the wayside and us limited income SS retirees no longer matter in this "show me the money" society . I'm sure in this day and age I have offended somebody by voicing my opinion .

    • @SpykersB
      @SpykersB หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      U r right!
      (N i'm not from the entitled little offended princess era lol). 🍻

    • @peggyj_SEO
      @peggyj_SEO หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A good hearty recession may just straighten out all this nonsense!

  • @kenmcclow8963
    @kenmcclow8963 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have reservations at two campgrounds in June where I didn’t pick a site and wasn’t asked about locking one. I think one has 87 sites and the other is maybe 30-40. I reserved at one because it is near a large popular state park which opens and fills site specific spots on January first, and if you should remember that you need to get a site on January 4th you will find that nearly every weekend is taken and while a small number of weekday sites are available, it would involve moving several times in the week.
    I’m also booked at another state park which opens reservations on a rolling six months prior schedule. That one lets you pick a specific spot and is less likely to fill immediately, but both of those are probably the reason for the site bots that report any cancellations and sometimes are able to immediately book a vacated spot. I used one of those bots a few years ago but every time someone else beat me to it.

  • @__WJK__
    @__WJK__ หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    There is no legitimate reason why campgrounds “need” to charge a special Site Lock or Site Pick fee. Any campground that does this, is taking blatant advantage of their customers.

    • @cirrus820travelers9
      @cirrus820travelers9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We especially dislike ANY fee to make reservations! Corporate America has added a new TAX on camping Americans requiring reservations (even day of in an EMPTY park!) just for the convenience of the internet. Some locations do not even have a phone or cell signal to access the company. I'm all for the government parks accepting CASH! Legal tender CASH for all debts.

  • @timinsandiego6979
    @timinsandiego6979 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Site lock fees are a money grab. The convoluted justifications you presented are just that, convoluted. Booking at campgrounds that don't pack rates with crap fees makes good sense.

  • @kradwonders
    @kradwonders หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Most site-lock fees I’ve seen are at least $25, some are more and some charge the fee on a daily basis not just a one time fee. I won’t stay there if they have that fee.

  • @steventoby3768
    @steventoby3768 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I no longer have an RV so I never had to deal with the site lock fee. However, this video showed a consideration I wouldn't have suspected in getting the site you want. We often had reasons for preferring one particular site, and usually the campground gave us that site. I suppose if we'd tried to reserve a site for 4th of July weekend we would have had more chance of getting moved around.

  • @janicecrockett1400
    @janicecrockett1400 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have a disability also a pet and do not like to be crammed in between two RVs like sardines in a can. I like end sites near a dog part if they have it. I also am on a fixed income. As far as I’m concerned site lock fees are theft. And, if I can’t pick my site I don’t use the campground.

  • @glenschumannGlensWorkshop
    @glenschumannGlensWorkshop หลายเดือนก่อน

    New to me. Just beginning an. 11 month trip. I will be watching for this.

  • @rickmorris588
    @rickmorris588 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I refuse to pay a site lock fee, period, end of story. If we want to be close to others we may be camping with, we take our chances with just a request to park staff upon checking in. Most of the time the staff has been able to help out but you have to understand they're not miracle workers, especially during peak seasons. Only once were we totally disappointed due to a complete lack of effort to get us close to one another. That was 5 years ago and we have taken our business to one of their competitors.

  • @SLloyd-qb8kt
    @SLloyd-qb8kt หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I just want a quiet place to enjoy a little solitude and nature. I'll take a hard pass on greedy overcrowded, expensive campgrounds and rv parks.

  • @greatbigguy
    @greatbigguy หลายเดือนก่อน

    Similar... every year for 4th of July my family goes to Redwood River Resort near Leggett California. Highly recommended btw. This is of course a very popular weekend. And many families have made this resort a 4th of July tradition. Instead of a fee, if you want the same site next year for the holiday, you have to book it when you check out and pay 1/2 of the fee up front. But this is only for that weekend, which would normally be booked as a block by any campers, not just the returning ones

  • @tomparker6470
    @tomparker6470 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In our area campgrounds (especially county parks) are charging a "reservation fee" even if you drive in and there are plenty of available sites. You can drive in to the campground, see many open sites, find a ranger or host to confirm availability and still are forced to use your smartphone to go online and reserve the open site you are standing on and pay the reservation fee. A total money grab in my opinion. Seems like they have all contracted with the same software developer and are working on eliminating any onsite registrations. It stinks.

  • @danieldorval4115
    @danieldorval4115 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We stayed at a nice resort once that had a site lock fee. I think it was $10/night but it was free and automatic if you booked 7 or more nights. Original plan was to stay 6 nights but I did 7 instead because I like picking my site. In the end they got their extra money but I got something too, an extra night.
    We mostly camp at state parks where you can pick your site, but there is a reservation fee.
    The fees I hate are the ones for wanting to bring all your children with you. Private campgrounds already charge WAY more, then it's like oh that 60 bucks a night, that's for 2 people.... oh your a family, well it's an extra $10/night/kid. Most state parks include 2 adults and ALL their dependent children under 18.

  • @markbogacz8933
    @markbogacz8933 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Camp sites in New Hampshire and Maine have always allowed people to pick your site from the sites available.

  • @aliannarodriguez1581
    @aliannarodriguez1581 หลายเดือนก่อน

    RVing used to be a way of traveling fairly cheaply. I keep running the numbers and it’s just not panning out anymore. The cost of the RV itself was always a huge barrier, and the low mileage makes fuel stops absolutely eye-watering. But now the campgrounds seemed to have decided they can charge anything because it’s still less than a hotel. You add it all together though and you are probably spending a lot more than you would staying in a hotel.

  • @gregoryfisher6156
    @gregoryfisher6156 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great job, Jason

  • @user-ur2qn1hg1o
    @user-ur2qn1hg1o หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't have my RV yet, however, I liken this to when I pay $20 more to select my cabin on a cruise ship. I could allow them to select it for free not knowing where they will put me until I get on the ship. But I prefer to select my room so that I know I will be happy with it. The company doesn't know what I need or like, so I get to make the right choice for me. I will definitely use the site lock feature when I travel.

  • @trevorhorne2095
    @trevorhorne2095 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the video. I understand site lock fees. The main problem I have is it seems many people make multiple reservations and are willing to pay the fee. And then they cancel for whatever reason. This practice makes it very difficult for spontaneous camping. I’m not sure what the answer is. No reservations? Higher fees? No cancellation? I just know it’s a problem and it’s harder to camp now than ever.