Man City are challenging the Premier League and other Premier League clubs are running to support them. Mark Goldbridge reacts to the scary crisis that is enveloping football.
As a Villa fan, I don't stand with City and it's poor from my club to back them. Only reason Villa have backed them is because we're flirting with the limits of ffp currently with revenue loss.
@AGE_97 You're backing up the point of the non-establishment clubs. Why should Newcastle and Villa have to sell their players when the clubs owners are rich? The red cartel want to stop them from spending so they can stay at the top.
@ironheade22. And this would change that how exactly? It would only mean 15 teams dropping even further behind, you do relize that, right? Or do you think a multi billionaire is going to chuck money at Forrest for example? If a club dont make enough money its just a money pit and no sane billionaire would go near it.
@@AGE_97but from what you’ve said the super league should happen because all the premier league big boys wanted to go and make stupid money with that but the world said no that’s not fair
If Man City win this case against the Premier League and beat their 115 charges, football fans across the country should come together and march upon the Etihad.
Ah, because your brain can’t comprehend that they haven’t done anything wrong. FFP is moving the goal posts, conveniently as city got new money. They WILL win this case.
As a Villa fan, it’s because our owners are close to City’s owners & we’re walking the line with FFP as are Newcastle & Chelsea. Which is pathetic in my opinion
Its gotta suck for the Nottingham forrest, Luton, shuffled utd etc, cause they basically know they're giving these teams 3 points cause they can't financially compete after coming up
@@karlharvey4806100% correct mate. The premier league & FFP have been structured to stop teams breaking into the big 6. It’s fundamentally broken, nearly every year the 3 that come up from the championship go back down because they don’t have the money to spend. & then on the off chance if they do spend it, they get docked points. It’s just broken
@@sambaines2I agree, FFP needs completely re building. We’re looking at selling Douglas Luiz, Jacob Ramsey & John Duran just to avoid a points deduction. It makes it so much harder for us to break into the top 4 again and or big six especially when we’ve had so many injuries this season & have no squad depth anyway. With that being said, setting this precedent with what City want to do will render the prem an absolute farmers league
Newcastle is a different situation, they are struggling BECAUSE they are willingly complying with FFP Whereas Chelsea blatantly violated FFP and are struggling because of it
@@sirwinstonchurchill2052 if they are truly whining about those with money, wouldn't it be clubs like Arsenal and utd instead of those small clubs owned by camel lovers?
Absolutely ridiculous to claim that a business you part/own can sign a sponsorship deal with a club that you also own, then book it as revenue. Just absurd.
In any other arena, it’s completely normal. EPL is just trying to stop crazy spending by the biggest clubs. It won’t work either. Since when do those with all the money get told what to do by those without? Never gonna happen
Again you need to realize they do regardless, of the Middle East boosts the cost of oil for the uk , who’s gonna stop them? You gotta think if found guilty the uk just pissed off one of the most powerful oil families in the world
Man U fan: “Never thought I’d fight side by side with a Liverpool fan.” Liverpool fan: “What about side by side with a friend?” Man U fan:”…Aye, I can do that” *Both charge at the Etihad stadium*
i am a liverpool fan. a lot of liverpool fans disagreed with me when i was happy utd beat city in the cup final at least utd won trophies on merit not buy cheating.
Arsenal fan here, also happy that man city lost. We are called bottlers for losing once since January, man city lost a home run of a final (no offense man utd)
Shouldn't people be more interested in real life rather than arguing over multimillionaires who fall out of nightclubs pissed up in pyjamas. Get a grip.
@@ryaneveritt8324 No, because not every club can be owned by a multi-billionaire, how is it fair that some clubs get plucked out of thin air to be bought by incredibly wealthy people or businesses and shot up the football pyramid when other clubs have done it properly and sustainably through hard work and smart investment.
Answer no there should be caps on spend and wage in every league it might actually stop clubs going in to admin and no longer existing. I think Wimbledon was one of the biggest clubs I saw go in to admin and die I know the have Wimbledon again in the lower league but it's not the same team and that take year to build anything but even less unlikely to achieve anything if you don't cap this and stop this madness of spending millions on one two players it hyper inflates the market. Mean small clubs have no chances I've always advocated for having more of a level playing field as might it see more teams win something like it used to be many moons ago.
@@padwaah5412it's hilarious - like people really think that if a Portsmouth or Burnley had a Saudi Prince owner that great players would go run to join their teams?? Highly unlikely lol it'd still take years
Man City don't make the rules.The rules were in place and they broke them. The rules might be unfair but you still have to follow them. Guilty as charged.
So therefore if said rules are to be ruled 'unfair' we should just ignore it and carry on? Seems a lot like hypocrisy to ensure their teams dominance.... that wouldn't be alien to teams like United, Liverpool and Arsenal would it?
Everton backing them as well because they know they are in big trouble if they ever get proof Usminov was the real owner and was sponsoring the new ground before it was even built and the training ground
This is not surprising. Clubs no longer listening to the fans. 19 clubs voting to keep VAR today without consulting their supporters sums up the system!!!
@@amfxband so u think on field decisions without replay are better than. VAR decisions 😂😂 what a joke bro... Few controversial decisions and u fans are so reactionary and hypocritical that's y fans shouldn't take decisions
It shouldn't matter if you change the rules from now on. They broke the rules when they were in place and all the other clubs followed the rules. It was an unfair advantage and they should pay for this injustice.
@PUBGh4di 😂 wow. So insightful. I wonder why City are suing on the grounds that the rules aren't fair (even though they have benefited from those very rules) in the hopes of getting said rules changed IF THEY DID THEIR BUSINESS BY THE BOOKS! Simple addition.
Villa are only doing it because they are ambitious, there would be teams defending them anyway and we just got a good adidas deal so you can see why villa would do that
I am a Chelsea fan and I’m pretty embarrassed that we are backing City, but I’m hardly surprised. The richest clubs are of course going to run and back City
@@Maax1200 Yep,cant afford to fix your stadium roof,sack ETH (even if SJR,initially wanted to !) and dithering over DA's release clause payment from NUFC ! 😂😂
Man city, chelsea, villa, etc if they don't want to comply with PL FFP rules, then just get the hell out and form your own super league. If PL bend over with their demands, then english football is officially dead at this point and now is just more on business
Arsenal, Man U and Liverpool can go join them. Teams that threw away the football pyramid and then came crying back once they realised they couldn't get away with destroying the league
They are complaining, Mark, because they KNOW that if they are found guilty and punished for the 115 Charges then they are basically done as a football entity as the punishment has to be severe. They know exactly what they are doing with this case next week. As you said, they are muddying the waters and if successful next week, they can then appeal the 115 charges (and cause further delays) because of the hearing next week. They are an absolute disgrace and don't care one bit about football at any level.
@@theletsplayer4921the charges won't just disappear. They could make life easier for themselves with this lawsuit, but some of these charges are completely unrelated
Also....the claimed revenue is clearly not 'Revenue in the truest sense of the word'. It's money shoved in from the owners just through a different channel. They have fudged their way to being in the Top 5 revenue earners in club football. It's a disgrace !!
@@PUBGh4di even if they aren't found guilty... Everyone knows they are guilty. Admirable that you stand by them I suppose, but, every piece of silverware under these corrupt owners is tainted.... EVERY PIECE OF SILVERWARE 🤬🤬
I won’t have any respect for rich clubs splitting away from the PL it says to me “the poor can’t be in our club”. Fans who struggle to pay for season tickets should oppose what City are doing
The fans lost the day the Premier league was formed, since then football has become a commercial enterprise and as long as there are people willing to watch the games the clubs will do what they want too
@@danielsingana9912 You play in the Premier League you sign up to the rules regardless of if you lose the vote.. (the vote being part of the rules) your welcome
If City win this, Im done with football. Only World Cups and Euros. Im fed up with corrptions in football. They are destroying this beautiful game we all love!!
Don't worry you'll be back next year shouting your red cartel club will win the lot because you have the best players only for CITY to happen again and you start crying 😂
@olsenfernandes3634 All I'm saying is if you own a credit card, you own a credit card. There's a reason you own a credit card. Don't act as if you own an oil well. And that's what this prem and the clubs behind ffp are doing. Everything City makes millions they alter their rules to ensure City can't spend. In the name of promoting equality. It's pretty laughable.
What other options do we st Villa have? We have no debt, we have qualified for the Champions League and our owners have the will and money to invest in our club. It's ridiculous that FFP limits have stayed static since 2015 given the enormous rise in inflation. We have just finished top 4 and now we are being forced against our will to sell a top asset. FFP is inherently unfair and keeps the Sky 6 nicely nestled at the top of the table. I don't like it but it's necessary if we are looking to continue our progress. The only way we can attract the investment we need is to invest in ourselves and we are being denied the right to do that.
The last thing you said, “are we headed towards franchise models. Where Rich owners don’t listen to fans but just to one another?” We’re already here. We’ve been here.
But the system we have now is pushing us to a repeated league finish of 1 Man Utd, 2 Liverpool 3 Chelsea 4 Arsenal for decades to come. There may be a swap between 3rd and 4th once in a while but the top two would be nailed on due to revenue. Revenue built up by spending big in another era. If there is a limit, then all clubs must be able to spend to the same numerical limit. One poor system replaced another...
Exactly. The established rich clubs don't care about the pyramid whatsoever because those same teams ran off and threw away the pyramidmto join the super league. Getting on their high horses and pretending they care is just to boot City, rightfully so for being cheats, but conveniently other clubs that could compete against them for titles which they were hoarding before city
The system you have now is literally delivering the same champion each year, Manchester City. Which is because they have built an unassailable financial position thanks to bogus, inflated sponsorship deals. How are you happy with that? It's the same silliness that's given us the "revamped" UEFA Champions League because football apparently needed to be saved from the Super League, regardless of the price and consequences.
man city should be given the red card and thrown out of the league, and stripped of everything they've ever won (bought) since they began cheating. I'm a Chelsea fan, man and boy, and if Chelsea back Man City? I will not support Chelsea anymore. Cheaters should never prosper - and neither should their cohorts.
@@dondappapumpumslappa8051 Irony? probably more 'delusion' on your part. I am not part of the Chelsea team, just a fan that sees football being destroyed by ALL teams that are owned by state sponsors. Wake up.
City are complaining about the rules because they know they don't stand a chance without having cooked the books. If they have to put in true sponsorship numbers, it will heavily decrease what they can spend. This is probably really impactful in their wages, if you ever wonder how they get such cheap transfers its because the their wages are ridiculous
Yet they still don’t have the highest wage bill… in fact it’s only this year they have moved up to second. Literally haven’t got a clue what you’re talking about.
@@tristanramsaroop9776they've been using offshore accounts to pay managers and players don't believe anything on their books 😂 hence the charge by the premier league failure to cooperate
They have all signed up to the rules, so it's tough. Just listen to what you are saying, allowing clubs to lose more than £100m a season, advocating for a business to lose over £100m a year you realise how crazy that sounds.
Agree with most of what Mark said but some stand outs. Firstly 8:25 this is already the case, the prem is already doped out of it’s mind compared to every other european league, only difference is, if City don’t get punished it’s just further establishing it. Second, considering what Mark said about what Qatar ownership would have done regarding this vote makes it even more questionable that he was so adamantly in favor of said ownership taking over his club.
Villa fan here - I reluctantly support Man City. Here’s why… the current PSR rules protect the Big 6 and simply doesn’t allow those clubs with wealthy owners to try and compete with the big boys. We are having to sell our best midfielder (Douglas Luiz) to simply comply with rules. How is it fair that we have to worsen our squad after finishing 4th and getting CL football If the Premier League had more suitable financial rules, this whole farce wouldn’t have happened. We want a competitive league… by restricting spending you’re guaranteeing the big six will ALWAYS remain the big six.
Because Villa overspent in previous years, how difficult is that to understand? And the same occurs in Europe, clubs like Milan having to compete with the TV money-funded English clubs while they can no longer be funded by wealthy owners like Berlusconi. They don't go on moaning about it as you do, how?
@@oldskoolmusicnostalgia you don’t get it. Villa can never spend as much as the top clubs because of FFP. Only allowed to spend a percentage of your revenue. Since they make less than the big clubs how are they ever going to catch up? It’s not an equal playing field. It’s a monopoly. Do you think Milan fans aren’t mad at what’s going on with their club since the early-mid 2000s? Do me a favour.
Don’t find it difficult at all as a Chelsea fan tbh, the league blocked us getting paramount as a sponsor last season which was a very lucrative fair deal for us
The rich billionaire owners who want to support their club are backing City. The rich billionaire owners who want to carry on owning premier league clubs but like seeing their money in their own accounts are against City. That’s just FACT
Pretending like the established PL clubs are here to save the football pyramid is complete BS, we know they only care about themselves and its proven with how quickly the likes of Arsenal, Man U, and Liverpool threw away the pyramid to go join the Super League.
As a Villa fan I want my club to be able to compete. Why should we have to sell players? We have qualified for the Champions League, why can't Villa and Newcastle be allowed to build on their achievements? The Premier League know Villa and Newcastle have revenue coming in from their ECL qualification and that should be taken into account to allow them to have a chance of winning something. Maybe the Premier League and the so called Big 6 don't want that to happen.
Right, so you are complaining about Villa not being able to spend money which they are actually allowed to spend? The depth of that argument, seriously.
@@johnnybravo4727 The PL as a whole is at fault as well. Fans being priced out billionaires putting them in debt and lining pockets. Do fans have any say? No, they sold their souls for success. English fans brought this on themselves and shouldn't sit back and wait for billionaires to fix a problem they started.
Villa have their own proposal which is to increase FFP limits in line with inflation. It's a perfectly reasonable request given the limit has been in place for nearly a decade without change.
@@19822andy That means the limit will never be tough enough to make the league competitive and will keep getting... inflated. Kicking the can down the road.
As a Newcastle fan it's strange because everyone agrees that the rules changed in 2021 only to stitch the Newcastle owners up so wouldn't be surprised if they end up backing man city??? More interesting to me is Man united fans taking the high ground about premier League rules and we all agree and voted for the rules??? Yet there new owners tap up Newcastle sporting director completely against premier League rules and he goes on TV with tears in his eyes saying it's madness good people on Gardening leave can't come and work for me unfortunately for him that's the rules and man United voted for the rules you got to laugh
@@dondappapumpumslappa8051 Totally agree,let MUFC follow UK contract law,and dutifully/legally pay up DA's release clause,so both teams can move on ;but this overall Goldbridge vid ,isn't discussing that,so this thread is distracting ! 😐😐
@@NatashaBurton yeah but my comment is in response to this video and he is complaining about man city taking premier League to court over the rules change in 2021 and money from sponsors and man city not following the premier rules that was voted on when his club is doing the exact same thing tapping up another teams member of staff??? Man united signed up to all the rules can't just break them because you're man United people in glass houses????
saying to league you do us on 115 charges, and we will sue you over this . DONT CARE WHAT THEY WON THEY WRECKING FOOTBALL. Petition needs starting kick city out of league. Doing everything to avoid a trial
I do not believe Aston Villa are supporting Manchester City in the 115 charges they face; instead, Villa are advocating for changes to financial regulations to enable teams to close the competitive gap. This is evident from Villa's proposal to adjust the financial threshold due to inflation. Teams like Aston Villa, Newcastle, and Chelsea are forced to sell homegrown players to comply with current regulations. As a club that recently ascended from the Championship I do not believe Villa support Manchester City, if found guilty of the alleged infractions, they should be held accountable for past violations. Villa's push for regulatory changes stems from their ambition to build a Champions League-caliber team despite financial constraints. Current TV rights and Champions League revenues do not immediately impact this year's finances, thereby limiting their ability to invest in the transfer market.
I think Harry Maguire is injured. But others should not have been left out especially Jack Grealish, Curtis Jones and Jarell Quansah. Very talented players but not getting chance
Great video from Talksport relating to this, clearly pointing out that this issue and the 115 are really not related. The issue here is around rules that came in this year. Clearly if City win this, the rules from this year will be withdrawn and replaced with another set.
I don’t believe the rules do stop smaller clubs progressing. Look at Newcastle last season and Villa this season. Both made CL qualification without breaking rules.
@@markygti138 True, but now both have to sell players whilst having squads nowhere close to being able to deal with League, European, and Cup football on a consistant basis.
Lets get one thing straight spending money doesnt equal success as Manchester United have spent more than Man City yet with less success than Liverpool who's owners havent put a single penny of their own money into LFC. Secondly all of our owners are multi billionaires its no surprise that its fans of club who owners dont spend their own money are the ones crying about Man City.
What are you even going on about, Mark?? The owners of Manchester United are still the Glazers. Sir Jim is a minority shareholder.. Look, the rules is bullshit and it is preventing clubs like Aston Villa , Newcastle and more who have ambition and would like to invest further into their clubs. Isn’t that what every fan wants from their owners??? If you are anti glazers, You should absolutely be backing Manchester City in their attempts to get this rule out of the PL. This has nothing to do with the 115 charges, it’s to do with bloody bloodsucking owners who think they can rest on their laurels and be protected from other ambitious clubs around them are coming after their guaranteed top 4 place in the league. It’s that simple.
The issue that most people can’t see is while yes teams like city shouldn’t have be able to spend infinite amounts ffp isn’t rhe solution either.ffp only protects United Liverpool and arsenal that’s it. Their two biggest rivals Chelsea and city are now handicapped. And the teams below them likes or spurs villa Newcastle can never spend enough money to get in thekr level there is absolutely nothing fair about that. Even Gary Neville said that who’s a United fan but difference is he’s a United fan with a brain. Something has to be brought in yes as there can’t just be no regulation but what’s currently in place is a disgrace and is just basically a lock on the door saying who’s in the top 6 is in and whoever is outside can never get in.
Hold on a minute? When the Glazers bought Utd with money from AIG, who then went to sponsor Utd and had quite a number of Glazers sitting on the board at AIG was all legal, right???
All the clubs running to city’s defence are all the clubs flirting with FFP and are all in the top 6 richest club owners in the league 🙄 shock horror 🤦🏻♂️
As a Chelsea fan I know exactly why our owners defending city. Its becuz they are also doing shady stuffs behind the scene as they are close to break ffp rules. They always try to find some sort of loophole to avoid the financial breach. I really hate them they not only ruined our football club but also ruining football.
All allegations, until verdict is reached for Chelsea and City before you believe anything. These red cartel fans only care about themselves even though they've spent as much
This is the only way the other Prem clubs can win anything get rid of Man City, Man U even sneek into Europe through the back door because you have been useless all season . Not a City fan but sour grapes comes to mind
Man City aren’t just fighting for the rule changes for themselves they are fighting against the premier league cartel for the rest of the premier league. If an owner has the money they should be able to spend it within an asset they own. Newcastle are the richest club in the world and they are having to sell their best players for reduced prices to comply with FFP, how is that fair. United and the bigger clubs can then come along and take these players for discounted prices - does this sound fair to you? Talking as a city fan here, city have the biggest revenue in the premier league and aren’t effect by these rules anymore but why should other clubs suffer when they have the cash to spend. The cartel are worried that they wont have there guaranteed europe spot anymore. The difference between city and the cartel is we invite competition but the cartel want to stop it.
I’m really not happy with what’s happening with Villa, we’ve had 2 years of (somewhat) success and for some reason we keep trying to defend the big boys, Villa fans need to start speaking up, honestly I wouldn’t even mind a protest
@@Brunos-magic-hat No. But Chelsea is too far away. This is the end of competitive football if the Super Rich Nations own our game. Nah. They can do one Swindon fan.
This is the dumbest analysis of the issues. No understanding of the background issues, no appreciation of the fact that there's no relationship between 115 & the current case.
I thought Chelsea were requesting greater transparency for the APT rules as well as quicker decision making. They were still upset with how long the Premier league took in its shirt sponsorship rulings last summer. Hardly a ringing endorsement of City's legal action!
Clubs have been penalised for all sorts of breaches in over the years but a decade on and the 115 charges are still hanging around and have been kicked down the road to November. Maybe by the 2030's it will finally be resolved.
Newcastle, a team that 3 years ago was on the brink of multiple relegations and widely regarded as a banter club, now backs a team in the fight to be able to spend as much money as a club wants to keep the smaller clubs down even more. The hypocrisy is unmatched, I don't want to see a single Newcastle fan back their club in this situation, know where you came from and be more humble.
@@Brunos-magic-hat Your club hasn't won a trophy in 66 years, you were a relegation side until a saudi trillionaire decided to use your city for proxy politics, and what City is advocating for would actively harm clubs like Newcastle if you weren't being used as a pawn in spreading pro-Saudi politics and tourism. You're a hypocrite of the highest caliber.
@@Brunos-magic-hat 3 years ago you would not be saying the same thing. What City is advocating for is going to actively harm clubs like Newcastle, the only reason Newcastle are backing City here is because the literal prince of Saudi Arabia who has executed more people than Newcastle have scored goals this year decided to use your city for proxy politics. Newcastle haven't even won a trophy in 66 years through awful management, know where you came from. You are a hypocrite of the highest caliber and no real football fan.
@Brunos-magic-hat So So so sooooo shortsighted. Fair play, to each their own. But you will take the game from all of us for your own benefit! Just selfish
@@padwaah5412 as a Man United fan your obviously going to be against this. We all just want the best outcomes for our clubs, selfish or not!! I wonder how you would feel if you had to sell your best players just to keep your club afloat.
Lol. Why did they keep VAR? I could have witnessed some comedy with horrendous refereeing decisions and looking at English fans crying in social media. The English don't deserve the Premier League. I honestly couldn't stop laughing when Soucek scored a goal with his hand. Imagine if VAR wasn't there, endless comedy and laughter that widens my life span.
Bottom line is, im a newcastle fan and we have the richest owners in world sport... but we're unable to spend the required amount it would take to compete with city. Ludicrous rules!
As a Villa fan, I don't stand with City and it's poor from my club to back them. Only reason Villa have backed them is because we're flirting with the limits of ffp currently with revenue loss.
Why do you think the clubs with the highest revenues should just win forever with no other club having the chance to compete?
@ironheade22 If your poor that's a you problem.
Why should a wealthy man sleep on the streets while he can live in a castle?
To prove what?
Fairness?
@AGE_97 You're backing up the point of the non-establishment clubs. Why should Newcastle and Villa have to sell their players when the clubs owners are rich? The red cartel want to stop them from spending so they can stay at the top.
@ironheade22. And this would change that how exactly? It would only mean 15 teams dropping even further behind, you do relize that, right? Or do you think a multi billionaire is going to chuck money at Forrest for example? If a club dont make enough money its just a money pit and no sane billionaire would go near it.
@@AGE_97but from what you’ve said the super league should happen because all the premier league big boys wanted to go and make stupid money with that but the world said no that’s not fair
If Man City win this case against the Premier League and beat their 115 charges, football fans across the country should come together and march upon the Etihad.
Ah, because your brain can’t comprehend that they haven’t done anything wrong. FFP is moving the goal posts, conveniently as city got new money. They WILL win this case.
@@tristanramsaroop9776 there will be a protest if city win the case. mark my words. everyone knows they're guilty.
@@tristanramsaroop9776They have done stuff wrong tho they already paid a £10m fine a few years ago
@@tristanramsaroop9776 woah woah, take it easy. You just pissed a couple hundred Utd, Arsenal and Liverpool fans. Here they come in 3, 2, 1...
When they do, there will be a mass exodus of premier league fans moving onto something better.
What a surprise, every single team who’s owner has been overspending compared to their clubs revenue is backing city
It's not their fault your football clubs and their owners brokies.
Your clubs have their heads deep in debts.
That's a you problem.
That's great
All corrupt clubs united :)
Truth
@@AGE_97it is if it’s corruption
As a Villa fan, it’s because our owners are close to City’s owners & we’re walking the line with FFP as are Newcastle & Chelsea. Which is pathetic in my opinion
Its gotta suck for the Nottingham forrest, Luton, shuffled utd etc, cause they basically know they're giving these teams 3 points cause they can't financially compete after coming up
@@karlharvey4806100% correct mate. The premier league & FFP have been structured to stop teams breaking into the big 6. It’s fundamentally broken, nearly every year the 3 that come up from the championship go back down because they don’t have the money to spend. & then on the off chance if they do spend it, they get docked points. It’s just broken
I'm not a Villa fan, - But if reports are to be believed and you have to sell before strengthening in a Champions League season is ridiculous.
@@sambaines2I agree, FFP needs completely re building. We’re looking at selling Douglas Luiz, Jacob Ramsey & John Duran just to avoid a points deduction. It makes it so much harder for us to break into the top 4 again and or big six especially when we’ve had so many injuries this season & have no squad depth anyway.
With that being said, setting this precedent with what City want to do will render the prem an absolute farmers league
Newcastle is a different situation, they are struggling BECAUSE they are willingly complying with FFP
Whereas Chelsea blatantly violated FFP and are struggling because of it
What a surprise rich clubs supporting rich clubs
@@sirwinstonchurchill2052 🤦🏻♂️
Yeah, richer clubs are trying to dominate more while playing the rules and the charges 😢
@@sirwinstonchurchill2052 if they are truly whining about those with money, wouldn't it be clubs like Arsenal and utd instead of those small clubs owned by camel lovers?
@sirwinstonchurchill2052. Thats the single dumbest thing iv read this year, and this is the internet.🤦
@@sirwinstonchurchill2052 Go touch grass kid, I hear your mouth breathing from here.
Send 115 to the National League immediately!
5 in a row 🎉🎉🎉
That’s not enough
@@antonyevans559your getting relegated 😂 get the wipes and your Man Utd shirt ready 😂😂
Nah we Staying up motherflipper
@@JackHillyard-bt2lky do u want us to support an even shittier club?
Absolutely ridiculous to claim that a business you part/own can sign a sponsorship deal with a club that you also own, then book it as revenue. Just absurd.
In any other arena, it’s completely normal. EPL is just trying to stop crazy spending by the biggest clubs.
It won’t work either. Since when do those with all the money get told what to do by those without? Never gonna happen
@@iancameron3799 a fair point!
Google inter company transactions , perfectly normal in business so long as you do so in accordance with accounting rules. Football is a unique case.
rich/cheating clubs support 115 FC... what a surprise 🤣🤣🤣
Isn’t it Liverpool, Arsenal and Man United who are convicted cheats?
Corrupt clubs united :)
▪︎Liverpool caught Hacking
▪︎Everton admit to FFP Cheating
▪︎City found Not Guilty in Court
▪︎Kick out - City or Liverpool,Everton?😂
@@HumanBeingsRThinkingBeings Liverpool what ?
@@fayesouthall6604
Lol, that's the famous grasping at straws from City fans :)
Foreign ownership should not be dictating the rules in this country
That's literally this country on a personal level, foreigners coming in and dictating our entire society.
That also applies to British life in general
Again you need to realize they do regardless, of the Middle East boosts the cost of oil for the uk , who’s gonna stop them? You gotta think if found guilty the uk just pissed off one of the most powerful oil families in the world
Populism? definitely not been done before by Tory grifters and Brexiteer hacks to disastrous effect
Ironic
Man U fan: “Never thought I’d fight side by side with a Liverpool fan.”
Liverpool fan: “What about side by side with a friend?”
Man U fan:”…Aye, I can do that”
*Both charge at the Etihad stadium*
i am a liverpool fan. a lot of liverpool fans disagreed with me when i was happy utd beat city in the cup final at least utd won trophies on merit not buy cheating.
@@stevendb1 I'm a Liverpool fan and I was happy that Man U beat City
😂😂
Arsenal fan here, also happy that man city lost. We are called bottlers for losing once since January, man city lost a home run of a final (no offense man utd)
the difference is Liverpool and Man United generate their income legitimately
Villa fan here. I'm ashamed of our club, I don't even understand why we're backing them
The premer league are breaking the law that's why?
I’m really disappointed in our club right now, first the moving people from their seats they’ve held for years and now this
@Trebleblues The rules were set with the 2/3rd majority vote. You must be a 115 FC fan.
Same. Don’t even see how it helps us. Without these rules it’ll just be Newcastle vs city every year, at least until the next oil state gets involved
Shouldn't people be more interested in real life rather than arguing over multimillionaires who fall out of nightclubs pissed up in pyjamas. Get a grip.
if they win this we can give up on football. The fact that there are actual fans defending this is beyond me
@@ryaneveritt8324 No, because not every club can be owned by a multi-billionaire, how is it fair that some clubs get plucked out of thin air to be bought by incredibly wealthy people or businesses and shot up the football pyramid when other clubs have done it properly and sustainably through hard work and smart investment.
@@ryaneveritt8324i had the same thought
Answer no there should be caps on spend and wage in every league it might actually stop clubs going in to admin and no longer existing. I think Wimbledon was one of the biggest clubs I saw go in to admin and die I know the have Wimbledon again in the lower league but it's not the same team and that take year to build anything but even less unlikely to achieve anything if you don't cap this and stop this madness of spending millions on one two players it hyper inflates the market. Mean small clubs have no chances I've always advocated for having more of a level playing field as might it see more teams win something like it used to be many moons ago.
@ryaneveritt8324 are you saying that their should be no caps at all? Do you realise what would happen if that was the case?
@@padwaah5412it's hilarious - like people really think that if a Portsmouth or Burnley had a Saudi Prince owner that great players would go run to join their teams?? Highly unlikely lol it'd still take years
Man City don't make the rules.The rules were in place and they broke them. The rules might be unfair but you still have to follow them. Guilty as charged.
Not if the rule brakes uk law as that means the premier league broke the uk rules idiot
Exactly. They agreed to the league's rules when they played every season.
Comin' back now to say it's unfair is ridiculous.
Well, prove it then.
So therefore if said rules are to be ruled 'unfair' we should just ignore it and carry on? Seems a lot like hypocrisy to ensure their teams dominance.... that wouldn't be alien to teams like United, Liverpool and Arsenal would it?
@@MrKearney12they won in spite of the stupid rules
If City win this football in this country is finished
Keep hating hahaha
@@paulmcfcmather8555😂😂😂
Man city must be banned from epl
@@paulmcfcmather8555 bot detected
Football is a business made for washing money, don't be so pure about it. This is the Wild West of the sports.
Of course Newcastle, Chelsea and Villa want City to win
They need the money.
What they had in common? They know that they're cheaters and soon gonna be punished. English football is dying right in front of our eyes
no, i want city to lose
@@RRP6632what rules have Newcastle broken?
Everton backing them as well because they know they are in big trouble if they ever get proof Usminov was the real owner and was sponsoring the new ground before it was even built and the training ground
Man city complaining about rules makes wolves and Forests complaints about VAR look like a joke
New chant for every fan that watch Man City this coming season: "YOU'VE WON F**K ALL, YOU'VE WON F**K ALL, MANCHESTER CITY, YOU JUST BOUGHT IT ALL!"
How long did that masterpiece take?
Champions again ole ole...
5 year old banter
WOW you have a very good talent
PLS KEEP IT HIDDEN LOL🤣🤣🤣
👎👎🤦♂️
This is not surprising. Clubs no longer listening to the fans. 19 clubs voting to keep VAR today without consulting their supporters sums up the system!!!
Yet VAR is a flipping disgrace 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@Phatboino1fans are illiterate VAR scrapping is like u don't know how to drive so u ban the car rather than learn driving
@@Pragyan-me6zw and until that driver is safe behind the wheel... they're not given a car.
@@amfxband so u think on field decisions without replay are better than. VAR decisions 😂😂 what a joke bro... Few controversial decisions and u fans are so reactionary and hypocritical that's y fans shouldn't take decisions
Silly comment really. VAR isn't the issue it's the stupid officials using it.
How have we allowed a Sheikh ruin our league and pollute the game with this legal/financial bile. The 115 needs to be held accountable!
please add zionist sheikh
Whatever an oil oligarch wants, they get!
It shouldn't matter if you change the rules from now on. They broke the rules when they were in place and all the other clubs followed the rules. It was an unfair advantage and they should pay for this injustice.
You can't prove it though can you? All you can do is make assumptions. City has been neither found guilty or not guilty yet.
@PUBGh4di 😂 wow. So insightful.
I wonder why City are suing on the grounds that the rules aren't fair (even though they have benefited from those very rules) in the hopes of getting said rules changed IF THEY DID THEIR BUSINESS BY THE BOOKS!
Simple addition.
Spot on
Yes, as a Villa fan, Im pretty disgusted by there support of City and this suit of theirs. It is disgraceful.
really makes me question my fandom
You are orobably not even a villa fan, chill
Villa are only doing it because they are ambitious, there would be teams defending them anyway and we just got a good adidas deal so you can see why villa would do that
@@PotatoVideosHD yeah because someone hating what their club does is not supporting them grow up find a new sport
You will be called Villains or Aston Villain!
Once i saw the title i was like “oh gosh wtf have we done 🤦♂️ “
Win or lose 115City will FOREVER be tainted.
I am a Chelsea fan and I’m pretty embarrassed that we are backing City, but I’m hardly surprised. The richest clubs are of course going to run and back City
@LiamHayes-hk7ix. As far as i know United isn't supporting this, and we have Inios now, who are stinking rich.
Weird,dont remember Chelsea fans complaining when former owner Abramovich was using CFC as a money-laundering platform to hoover up trophies,etc.! 🙄🙄
United? Liverpool? Arsenal? The difference is they didn’t buy their success through dodgy means.
@@MikeBird95Really? United broke multiple transfer records liverpool hacked citys scouts and arsenal tbf are bottle jobs
@@Maax1200 Yep,cant afford to fix your stadium roof,sack ETH (even if SJR,initially wanted to !) and dithering over DA's release clause payment from NUFC ! 😂😂
Man city, chelsea, villa, etc if they don't want to comply with PL FFP rules, then just get the hell out and form your own super league. If PL bend over with their demands, then english football is officially dead at this point and now is just more on business
Do you support one of the original scumbag Super League teams?
@@DarkArterialGoreare u under 18 and a city fan whos never even been to Manchester
Seriously if they formed super league who's going to watch them they are small team with no fan base 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂@@DarkArterialGore
Arsenal, Man U and Liverpool can go join them. Teams that threw away the football pyramid and then came crying back once they realised they couldn't get away with destroying the league
This has everything to do with 115 charges and nothing else. They're guilty as charged.
Brother are you dumb? The charges are until 2018.
This rule came out in 2021. So how tf does it correlate? 🙄
They are complaining, Mark, because they KNOW that if they are found guilty and punished for the 115 Charges then they are basically done as a football entity as the punishment has to be severe. They know exactly what they are doing with this case next week. As you said, they are muddying the waters and if successful next week, they can then appeal the 115 charges (and cause further delays) because of the hearing next week. They are an absolute disgrace and don't care one bit about football at any level.
@@ryaneveritt8324Ok 115 FC. Do that Sharia Law on Camel League.
@@shuraamanolol
@@ryaneveritt8324these red cartel fans are the true liberals, they don't even want to listen 😂
The hearing has already been confirmed mate. It's in November.
@@PUBGh4di I heard the mate...here's hoping it goes ahead and doesn't get settled out of court 😞
if city win lance Armstrong is gonna sue the 'tour de france' for its unfair doping rules lol.
Get your own material.. that's only been used a 2654788 times
I’m less stressed than before, City suing has shown their hand - they are absolutely bricking it for the 115 charges, and I can’t wait.
Nope as they prove the rules unlawful and bam a bunch of charges are gone its a good legal move
@@theletsplayer4921lol u must be a child no adult is that thick
@@theletsplayer4921the charges won't just disappear. They could make life easier for themselves with this lawsuit, but some of these charges are completely unrelated
Also....the claimed revenue is clearly not 'Revenue in the truest sense of the word'. It's money shoved in from the owners just through a different channel. They have fudged their way to being in the Top 5 revenue earners in club football. It's a disgrace !!
Prove it then mate. Stop with your delusional assumptions.
@@PUBGh4di 🤣🤣🤣
@@PUBGh4di even if they aren't found guilty... Everyone knows they are guilty. Admirable that you stand by them I suppose, but, every piece of silverware under these corrupt owners is tainted.... EVERY PIECE OF SILVERWARE 🤬🤬
Yep, imagine going to the bank and asking for a higher limit on your credit card because your mum and dad are supplying your income with pocket money.
I won’t have any respect for rich clubs splitting away from the PL it says to me “the poor can’t be in our club”. Fans who struggle to pay for season tickets should oppose what City are doing
Why city says the current rules mean higher ticket prices idiot
The fans lost the day the Premier league was formed, since then football has become a commercial enterprise and as long as there are people willing to watch the games the clubs will do what they want too
The irony is that all clubs signed up to these rules.
Not all it's the 14 club rule only 14 need to vote for the rule
@@danielsingana9912 You play in the Premier League you sign up to the rules regardless of if you lose the vote.. (the vote being part of the rules) your welcome
@@danielsingana9912please have a clue what u are talking about befor u talk absolute crap kid
@@hyperionbusinessconsultant1532yes but if the rule brakes uk law the vote means jack
@@hyperionbusinessconsultant1532what in the dictatorship
If City win this, Im done with football. Only World Cups and Euros. Im fed up with corrptions in football. They are destroying this beautiful game we all love!!
@melo4931
💯
You won’t be missed 😂😂😂
Don't worry you'll be back next year shouting your red cartel club will win the lot because you have the best players only for CITY to happen again and you start crying 😂
Premier is as much genuine sport as WWE.
Why
No real shock that Chelsea, Newcastle and Villa are keen to support City on this
As they should.
They're rich.
Your club is poor and deep in debts.
That's a you problem.
@@AGE_97 🙌
@@AGE_97 Bro is advocating for clubs to have credit cards while making fun of people who's club are in credit???
@olsenfernandes3634 All I'm saying is if you own a credit card, you own a credit card.
There's a reason you own a credit card.
Don't act as if you own an oil well.
And that's what this prem and the clubs behind ffp are doing. Everything City makes millions they alter their rules to ensure City can't spend. In the name of promoting equality.
It's pretty laughable.
What other options do we st Villa have? We have no debt, we have qualified for the Champions League and our owners have the will and money to invest in our club. It's ridiculous that FFP limits have stayed static since 2015 given the enormous rise in inflation.
We have just finished top 4 and now we are being forced against our will to sell a top asset. FFP is inherently unfair and keeps the Sky 6 nicely nestled at the top of the table.
I don't like it but it's necessary if we are looking to continue our progress. The only way we can attract the investment we need is to invest in ourselves and we are being denied the right to do that.
The last thing you said, “are we headed towards franchise models. Where Rich owners don’t listen to fans but just to one another?” We’re already here. We’ve been here.
Salary cap would solve this. Have a minimum spend level and a maximum spend level. FFP is obviously not working.
@@ryaneveritt8324spot on! they don’t like this question. Never seen anyone answer it!
But the system we have now is pushing us to a repeated league finish of 1 Man Utd, 2 Liverpool 3 Chelsea 4 Arsenal for decades to come. There may be a swap between 3rd and 4th once in a while but the top two would be nailed on due to revenue. Revenue built up by spending big in another era. If there is a limit, then all clubs must be able to spend to the same numerical limit. One poor system replaced another...
Exactly. The established rich clubs don't care about the pyramid whatsoever because those same teams ran off and threw away the pyramidmto join the super league. Getting on their high horses and pretending they care is just to boot City, rightfully so for being cheats, but conveniently other clubs that could compete against them for titles which they were hoarding before city
The system you have now is literally delivering the same champion each year, Manchester City. Which is because they have built an unassailable financial position thanks to bogus, inflated sponsorship deals.
How are you happy with that? It's the same silliness that's given us the "revamped" UEFA Champions League because football apparently needed to be saved from the Super League, regardless of the price and consequences.
@@oldskoolmusicnostalgia you are lying.
City's success is not due to money. Man u has spent as much as city but no where to be found.
Not about a game of football anymore, it’s a game of chess now!
Business.. All about business and $..
Says the guy twerking for a state to buy United 😂😂
We were twerking for full ownership not partnership of which we have no idea what it entails
@@zjenergizer9363 so twerking for the exact thing city has
It did not happen so why are you crying? Did United ever inflate deals from bogus sponsors?
Shock the billionaires are ganging up against the millionaires
And the only ones who suffer are the non super league clubs in the pyramid. Always the rich messing with the league and destroying it
As a united fan, the only reason our owners are not jumping on this is they like the idea of having an excuse of not having to spend money
As a Chelsea fan, im all for it. It's a stupid rule anyway.
man city should be given the red card and thrown out of the league, and stripped of everything they've ever won (bought) since they began cheating. I'm a Chelsea fan, man and boy, and if Chelsea back Man City? I will not support Chelsea anymore. Cheaters should never prosper - and neither should their cohorts.
Didn't Chelsea prosper through a bent Russian owner . Pot calling the kettle black
What team will you support instead?
@@ivir_shieldogaming342 the spice girls
The irony from a Chelsea team
@@dondappapumpumslappa8051 Irony? probably more 'delusion' on your part. I am not part of the Chelsea team, just a fan that sees football being destroyed by ALL teams that are owned by state sponsors. Wake up.
City are complaining about the rules because they know they don't stand a chance without having cooked the books. If they have to put in true sponsorship numbers, it will heavily decrease what they can spend. This is probably really impactful in their wages, if you ever wonder how they get such cheap transfers its because the their wages are ridiculous
Yet they still don’t have the highest wage bill… in fact it’s only this year they have moved up to second. Literally haven’t got a clue what you’re talking about.
@@tristanramsaroop9776 brother actually do some research before commenting. Makes you look pretty dumb. All the best
@@tristanramsaroop9776 but that's assuming honesty and transparency lol, something which is demonstrably very doubtful.
@@tristanramsaroop9776they've been using offshore accounts to pay managers and players don't believe anything on their books 😂 hence the charge by the premier league failure to cooperate
There are 2 different cases...
Hello Mark great channel! There is a banner on your screen regarding the champions league final FYI.
They have all signed up to the rules, so it's tough.
Just listen to what you are saying, allowing clubs to lose more than £100m a season, advocating for a business to lose over £100m a year you realise how crazy that sounds.
Agree with most of what Mark said but some stand outs.
Firstly 8:25 this is already the case, the prem is already doped out of it’s mind compared to every other european league, only difference is, if City don’t get punished it’s just further establishing it.
Second, considering what Mark said about what Qatar ownership would have done regarding this vote makes it even more questionable that he was so adamantly in favor of said ownership taking over his club.
Villa fan here - I reluctantly support Man City.
Here’s why… the current PSR rules protect the Big 6 and simply doesn’t allow those clubs with wealthy owners to try and compete with the big boys. We are having to sell our best midfielder (Douglas Luiz) to simply comply with rules. How is it fair that we have to worsen our squad after finishing 4th and getting CL football
If the Premier League had more suitable financial rules, this whole farce wouldn’t have happened.
We want a competitive league… by restricting spending you’re guaranteeing the big six will ALWAYS remain the big six.
Yep couldn’t agree more! It’s embarrassing how people are going at City rather than having a go at the red cartel and the premier league.
Because Villa overspent in previous years, how difficult is that to understand?
And the same occurs in Europe, clubs like Milan having to compete with the TV money-funded English clubs while they can no longer be funded by wealthy owners like Berlusconi. They don't go on moaning about it as you do, how?
@@oldskoolmusicnostalgia you don’t get it. Villa can never spend as much as the top clubs because of FFP. Only allowed to spend a percentage of your revenue. Since they make less than the big clubs how are they ever going to catch up? It’s not an equal playing field. It’s a monopoly.
Do you think Milan fans aren’t mad at what’s going on with their club since the early-mid 2000s? Do me a favour.
Don’t find it difficult at all as a Chelsea fan tbh, the league blocked us getting paramount as a sponsor last season which was a very lucrative fair deal for us
What is weird is the reason why City's issue has dragged this long. Very certain, lawyers were allowed to develop a case
The rich billionaire owners who want to support their club are backing City. The rich billionaire owners who want to carry on owning premier league clubs but like seeing their money in their own accounts are against City. That’s just FACT
Pretending like the established PL clubs are here to save the football pyramid is complete BS, we know they only care about themselves and its proven with how quickly the likes of Arsenal, Man U, and Liverpool threw away the pyramid to go join the Super League.
As a Villa fan I want my club to be able to compete. Why should we have to sell players? We have qualified for the Champions League, why can't Villa and Newcastle be allowed to build on their achievements? The Premier League know Villa and Newcastle have revenue coming in from their ECL qualification and that should be taken into account to allow them to have a chance of winning something. Maybe the Premier League and the so called Big 6 don't want that to happen.
What are you talking about? You can spend the money you make from Europe 😂
Right, so you are complaining about Villa not being able to spend money which they are actually allowed to spend? The depth of that argument, seriously.
Money is destroying football😢
HAS destroyed football
@@craigjennings4921 You're not wrong there.
Since psg paid 220m for neymar, money started ruining football.
@@johnnybravo4727 Since Man U joined the Stock Exchange.
@@johnnybravo4727 The PL as a whole is at fault as well. Fans being priced out billionaires putting them in debt and lining pockets. Do fans have any say? No, they sold their souls for success. English fans brought this on themselves and shouldn't sit back and wait for billionaires to fix a problem they started.
It’s not even confirmed chelsea Newcastle and villa support city. I hate media and sensationalism
Villa have their own proposal which is to increase FFP limits in line with inflation. It's a perfectly reasonable request given the limit has been in place for nearly a decade without change.
@@19822andy That make good fiscal sense.👍👍
@@19822andy That means the limit will never be tough enough to make the league competitive and will keep getting... inflated. Kicking the can down the road.
@@oldskoolmusicnostalgia Villa's proposal was shot down in the meeting which was a preposterous outcome.
Man city's recent success has rattled feathers. Sueing the Prem is shameless and I'm loving every moment 🤣😂
As a Newcastle fan it's strange because everyone agrees that the rules changed in 2021 only to stitch the Newcastle owners up so wouldn't be surprised if they end up backing man city??? More interesting to me is Man united fans taking the high ground about premier League rules and we all agree and voted for the rules??? Yet there new owners tap up Newcastle sporting director completely against premier League rules and he goes on TV with tears in his eyes saying it's madness good people on Gardening leave can't come and work for me unfortunately for him that's the rules and man United voted for the rules you got to laugh
That’s goldbride for you he picks and chooses his battles.
If ur sporting director wanted to leave he should be able to your in Saudi Arabia yet u cant hold ppl against there will
@@dondappapumpumslappa8051 Totally agree,let MUFC follow UK contract law,and dutifully/legally pay up DA's release clause,so both teams can move on ;but this overall Goldbridge vid ,isn't discussing that,so this thread is distracting ! 😐😐
Slightly different tapping up a SD to 115 charges relating to financial irregularities 😂😂
@@NatashaBurton yeah but my comment is in response to this video and he is complaining about man city taking premier League to court over the rules change in 2021 and money from sponsors and man city not following the premier rules that was voted on when his club is doing the exact same thing tapping up another teams member of staff??? Man united signed up to all the rules can't just break them because you're man United people in glass houses????
The 1.15 subscriber count on the top left tho 💀
🤯
*though
Foreign ownership shouldn't even be allowed.
@@kunimitsune177The British are poor bro. 😂
ALL Clubs should have a MAX spend that would solve everything! And would make it fair
It would have to be the same for everyone and not based on revenue otherwise it would not be fair...
saying to league you do us on 115 charges, and we will sue you over this . DONT CARE WHAT THEY WON THEY WRECKING FOOTBALL. Petition needs starting kick city out of league. Doing everything to avoid a trial
Why wouldn't I want my club to spend so I can compete against the big 6? Ffp and psr was brought in to keep the big 6 in power 🤷🏻
Yep… we Stand with Man City!!
Nah that's just BS spinn from Oil clubs.
I do not believe Aston Villa are supporting Manchester City in the 115 charges they face; instead, Villa are advocating for changes to financial regulations to enable teams to close the competitive gap. This is evident from Villa's proposal to adjust the financial threshold due to inflation. Teams like Aston Villa, Newcastle, and Chelsea are forced to sell homegrown players to comply with current regulations. As a club that recently ascended from the Championship I do not believe Villa support Manchester City, if found guilty of the alleged infractions, they should be held accountable for past violations. Villa's push for regulatory changes stems from their ambition to build a Champions League-caliber team despite financial constraints. Current TV rights and Champions League revenues do not immediately impact this year's finances, thereby limiting their ability to invest in the transfer market.
Definitely feel for AVFC & NUFC in this situation; not so much for CFC whose money-laundering under Abramovich started this whole,sorry issue ! 😐😐
Corruption corrupts.
Money corrupts
Should say the same for the 90's
Jack Grealish, Harry Maguire, James Maddison, Jarrad Brantwaite, James Trafford, Curtis Jones and Jarell Quansah left out of final squad
I think Harry Maguire is injured. But others should not have been left out especially Jack Grealish, Curtis Jones and Jarell Quansah. Very talented players but not getting chance
If the PL make the rules then any club not abiding by the rules has two options... take the punishment or leave the league.
Or, they can challenge the rules in a court of law. Like in any business.
Great video from Talksport relating to this, clearly pointing out that this issue and the 115 are really not related. The issue here is around rules that came in this year. Clearly if City win this, the rules from this year will be withdrawn and replaced with another set.
The rules were brought in to stop Newcastle progressing after the takeover.
I don’t believe the rules do stop smaller clubs progressing. Look at Newcastle last season and Villa this season. Both made CL qualification without breaking rules.
@@markygti138and now villa has to sell so it is protecting the elite
But all the stories about forcing sale of players for ffp or are you blind... can you not connect the dots... @markygti138
@@markygti138both are being forced to sell really fair that is idiot
@@markygti138 True, but now both have to sell players whilst having squads nowhere close to being able to deal with League, European, and Cup football on a consistant basis.
Lets get one thing straight spending money doesnt equal success as Manchester United have spent more than Man City yet with less success than Liverpool who's owners havent put a single penny of their own money into LFC. Secondly all of our owners are multi billionaires its no surprise that its fans of club who owners dont spend their own money are the ones crying about Man City.
Clueless
What are you even going on about, Mark?? The owners of Manchester United are still the Glazers. Sir Jim is a minority shareholder..
Look, the rules is bullshit and it is preventing clubs like Aston Villa , Newcastle and more who have ambition and would like to invest further into their clubs. Isn’t that what every fan wants from their owners???
If you are anti glazers, You should absolutely be backing Manchester City in their attempts to get this rule out of the PL.
This has nothing to do with the 115 charges, it’s to do with bloody bloodsucking owners who think they can rest on their laurels and be protected from other ambitious clubs around them are coming after their guaranteed top 4 place in the league.
It’s that simple.
Fact! But but Mark and the Cartel will make it all about City
Only thing that need to change is to ban Countries and Institutions from owning clubs!!! Like US NFL…. More level playing field and real sports
Good idea,quite happy to see US owners of Arsenal,Chelsea,Liverpool and Man Utd,sell up and p**s off ! 👌👍
The issue that most people can’t see is while yes teams like city shouldn’t have be able to spend infinite amounts ffp isn’t rhe solution either.ffp only protects United Liverpool and arsenal that’s it. Their two biggest rivals Chelsea and city are now handicapped. And the teams below them likes or spurs villa Newcastle can never spend enough money to get in thekr level there is absolutely nothing fair about that. Even Gary Neville said that who’s a United fan but difference is he’s a United fan with a brain. Something has to be brought in yes as there can’t just be no regulation but what’s currently in place is a disgrace and is just basically a lock on the door saying who’s in the top 6 is in and whoever is outside can never get in.
Gary Neville, with a brain? You lost me there.
Only one way to stop franchise. Don't buy merch, don't buy season tickets and most importantly don't buy sky TNT subscriptions.
Thought Villa were better than that.
The Premier league is corrupt. I'm so thankful City has the balls
Hold on a minute? When the Glazers bought Utd with money from AIG, who then went to sponsor Utd and had quite a number of Glazers sitting on the board at AIG was all legal, right???
Nothing will ever happen with city’s 115 charges, that’s just a fact
All the clubs running to city’s defence are all the clubs flirting with FFP and are all in the top 6 richest club owners in the league 🙄 shock horror 🤦🏻♂️
Guy was twerking for Qatar only 6 months ago what a bloody hypocrite
Mark, help us restore faith and justice in the leagues. Cast your healing ideas across the footballing landscape. We need you now more than ever.
😂😂You're an odd one😂😂
Moses, Jesus, and Mark Goldbridge, bring divine healing light to the premier League.
😂What?
@@gregd3344 What are you saying? Please just keep shut.
@@nosaerhunmwunse7812 this channel sprouts truth like abundant seeds from gods favorite blossoms.
As a Chelsea fan I know exactly why our owners defending city. Its becuz they are also doing shady stuffs behind the scene as they are close to break ffp rules. They always try to find some sort of loophole to avoid the financial breach. I really hate them they not only ruined our football club but also ruining football.
All allegations, until verdict is reached for Chelsea and City before you believe anything. These red cartel fans only care about themselves even though they've spent as much
Fair play for admitting it. I'd feel the same. No real fan wants these people running their club. City fans must be desperate for trophies
This is the only way the other Prem clubs can win anything get rid of Man City, Man U even sneek into Europe through the back door because you have been useless all season . Not a City fan but sour grapes comes to mind
It all comes down to the Premier league rushing and not fully understanding the rules they make.
Man City aren’t just fighting for the rule changes for themselves they are fighting against the premier league cartel for the rest of the premier league.
If an owner has the money they should be able to spend it within an asset they own. Newcastle are the richest club in the world and they are having to sell their best players for reduced prices to comply with FFP, how is that fair. United and the bigger clubs can then come along and take these players for discounted prices - does this sound fair to you?
Talking as a city fan here, city have the biggest revenue in the premier league and aren’t effect by these rules anymore but why should other clubs suffer when they have the cash to spend. The cartel are worried that they wont have there guaranteed europe spot anymore. The difference between city and the cartel is we invite competition but the cartel want to stop it.
115
I’m really not happy with what’s happening with Villa, we’ve had 2 years of (somewhat) success and for some reason we keep trying to defend the big boys, Villa fans need to start speaking up, honestly I wouldn’t even mind a protest
Make a sign and go down to the Villa gates...I would but live miles away
You’re not a Villa fan
@@Brunos-magic-hat No. But Chelsea is too far away. This is the end of competitive football if the Super Rich Nations own our game. Nah. They can do one
Swindon fan.
Just let newcastle spend like crazy. Would love to see that.
Never thought one day all Premier League fans come together against Man City. (Newcastle except maybe)
This is the dumbest analysis of the issues. No understanding of the background issues, no appreciation of the fact that there's no relationship between 115 & the current case.
Absolutely clueless
I thought Chelsea were requesting greater transparency for the APT rules as well as quicker decision making. They were still upset with how long the Premier league took in its shirt sponsorship rulings last summer. Hardly a ringing endorsement of City's legal action!
Mark hates Man city and he thinks we should hate too, as a Chelsea fan we should support and do business with city!
Chelsea old Manchester city. Both stupid fans.
😂😂😂😂
Why do you think we gave you Palmer and sterling? 😂😂
😂😂
Mark, give me a break. Our Club wanted to form a Super League. That's worst than these clubs running to support City.
Captain Goldbridge :Civil War
Clubs have been penalised for all sorts of breaches in over the years but a decade on and the 115 charges are still hanging around and have been kicked down the road to November. Maybe by the 2030's it will finally be resolved.
Newcastle, a team that 3 years ago was on the brink of multiple relegations and widely regarded as a banter club, now backs a team in the fight to be able to spend as much money as a club wants to keep the smaller clubs down even more. The hypocrisy is unmatched, I don't want to see a single Newcastle fan back their club in this situation, know where you came from and be more humble.
We back Man City all the way!!
@@Brunos-magic-hat Your club hasn't won a trophy in 66 years, you were a relegation side until a saudi trillionaire decided to use your city for proxy politics, and what City is advocating for would actively harm clubs like Newcastle if you weren't being used as a pawn in spreading pro-Saudi politics and tourism. You're a hypocrite of the highest caliber.
@@Brunos-magic-hat 3 years ago you would not be saying the same thing. What City is advocating for is going to actively harm clubs like Newcastle, the only reason Newcastle are backing City here is because the literal prince of Saudi Arabia who has executed more people than Newcastle have scored goals this year decided to use your city for proxy politics. Newcastle haven't even won a trophy in 66 years through awful management, know where you came from. You are a hypocrite of the highest caliber and no real football fan.
@Brunos-magic-hat
So So so sooooo shortsighted. Fair play, to each their own. But you will take the game from all of us for your own benefit! Just selfish
@@padwaah5412 as a Man United fan your obviously going to be against this. We all just want the best outcomes for our clubs, selfish or not!!
I wonder how you would feel if you had to sell your best players just to keep your club afloat.
I am in favor tbh, it will help the PL become greater, the current rules only hinder the PL.
I kinda just want City to win just to see all the rage 😂
😂😂😂
Some goldbrigde Minions might kill themselves 😂
The laws not being fair is completely irrelevant. Since when do we get to break laws that we don’t think are “fair”?
The pl clubs just voted 19 to 1 in favour of keeping var
What a shame
Respect to wolves
Despicable
embarrassing how not one club sided with wolves, var will never work with these awful refs so just switch it off
Lol. Why did they keep VAR?
I could have witnessed some comedy with horrendous refereeing decisions and looking at English fans crying in social media.
The English don't deserve the Premier League.
I honestly couldn't stop laughing when Soucek scored a goal with his hand. Imagine if VAR wasn't there, endless comedy and laughter that widens my life span.
your life sounds pathetic
I called this. Coincidence that the Liverpool chair came out today and lobbied for games in NY?
Bottom line is, im a newcastle fan and we have the richest owners in world sport... but we're unable to spend the required amount it would take to compete with city. Ludicrous rules!
Clubs should not be state owned. Biggest mistake in football.
"I understand why other people want to do it..."
Two wrongs DON'T make a right.
For that matter, nor do 115!