Thank you! I have now a better understanding the difference between the two. However, When going through colonialism I've noticed the map of Africa which show all of the countries are colonized, which is wrong!. Ethiopia and Libya have never been colonized. Take notes. Thanks again for the info, it was helpful.
The whole of North Africa was colonised by the Romans or is that too far back for you to care about ? Do you know anything about the Islamic Conquest that murdered, raped slashed and burnt its way across Africa, The Middle East, India and South and Central Asia ? Or what about The Otterman Empire? It controlled most of North Africa and The Middle East and was just as brutal and bloodthirsty as the Islamic invaders and both of these Empires were up to their necks in slaves, eunuchs and concubines ! Why never any mention of factual history, and what is this constant condemnation of anything Europen, the most advanced civilisation ever to walk this Earth Open you eyes and see !
John 3:16-21 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
Rachel .i am really sorry to say that you Don't have a slightest idea about the history. As you defined old imperialism quoting India's example saying that it was with cooperation that British gained control .it was all war ,blood and deceit
Actually it is you, Sir, who has no idea about Indian or World History. The "war" was Indian, the "blood" was Indian and the "deceit" was Indian. The participation and the non-participation of that of the Indians. British mostly provided support to those who would prove best for their own benefits. Had there been no cooperation by the Indians, the British, the French, the Dutch, the Spanish, or any other European power could not have had control over an inch of land in the subcontinent. So I am really sorry to say that YOU dont have a slightest idea about history.
I looked for the answers to specific questions and watched a lot of TH-cam videos. Your video answered most my questions. Thank you.
Thanks a lot for clarification on these two concepts. Now, I completely understand what are they.. Much thanks...
Simplified such crucial and complex issues.Wonderful explanation 👏
like that video becase cleared concept thanks now video on International relations from basics
You did an excellent job got 2 be the best video on youtube!!
Very well explained
Crystal clear
thank you
your video help in my paper
Did you mention the Ottoman empire, Incas, Aztecs, Mughals and China ?
Thank you! I have now a better understanding the difference between the two. However, When going through colonialism I've noticed the map of Africa which show all of the countries are colonized, which is wrong!. Ethiopia and Libya have never been colonized. Take notes.
Thanks again for the info, it was helpful.
Ebrom Getachew Libya was colonized by Italians. Ethiopia and Liberia are the only two African counteies that were never colonized
The whole of North Africa was colonised by the Romans or is that too far back for you to care about ?
Do you know anything about the Islamic Conquest that murdered, raped slashed and burnt its way across Africa, The Middle East, India and South and Central Asia ?
Or what about The Otterman Empire?
It controlled most of North Africa and The Middle East and was just as brutal and bloodthirsty as the Islamic invaders and both of these Empires were up to their necks in slaves, eunuchs and concubines !
Why never any mention of factual history, and what is this constant condemnation of anything Europen, the most advanced civilisation ever to walk this Earth
Open you eyes and see !
thank you
Woah
thank you mam
Countries are trying themselves to raid but...they failed..
Thanks
hmm yes, stuff
Thanks for the help...
THANK YOU, LOVE FROM INDIA
John 3:16-21 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
Rachel .i am really sorry to say that you Don't have a slightest idea about the history.
As you defined old imperialism quoting India's example saying that it was with cooperation that British gained control .it was all war ,blood and deceit
Actually it is you, Sir, who has no idea about Indian or World History. The "war" was Indian, the "blood" was Indian and the "deceit" was Indian. The participation and the non-participation of that of the Indians. British mostly provided support to those who would prove best for their own benefits. Had there been no cooperation by the Indians, the British, the French, the Dutch, the Spanish, or any other European power could not have had control over an inch of land in the subcontinent. So I am really sorry to say that YOU dont have a slightest idea about history.