Crashing 19 Seconds After Takeoff in Canada | TWO Boeing 747s in Danger (Real Video & Audio)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.ค. 2024
- A Boeing 747 cargo aircraft operating as MK Airlines Flight 1602 begins its takeoff roll at Halifax Stanfield International Airport, Nova Scotia. At 0654:10, the flight crew attempts to rotate the aircraft, however, the jet fails to lift off. At 0654:29, just 19 seconds later, the 747 crashes. 33 years prior, another Boeing 747 operating as Pan Am Flight 845 strikes approach lighting system structures located past the end of the runway during the takeoff roll (with real video). Find out what really happened.
Get early access to future videos and support the channel here:
• / theflightchannel
Check out the Official Shop with merchandise here:
• teespring.com/stores/thefligh...
Follow TheFlightChannel
• Facebook: / theflightchannel
• Instagram: / tfc_aviation
Business Enquiries
• Email: contact.theflightchannel@gmail.com
This video has been recorded and edited in 4K resolution and 60FPS. - บันเทิง
MK Airlines Flight 1602 - Crew of 7 sadly died. The aircraft was loaded with a cargo of lawn tractors and made an intermediate stop at Halifax to be loaded up with approximately 53,000 kilograms (53 t; 117,000 lb) of lobster and fish.
guess ill never see new videos from this channel, just a bunch of re-uploads.
Fatalities in first incident not mentioned. So nice that there were no fatalities in the second incident.
A very nicely presented video. Thanks
Lol at the emergency slide fail at the end
every time i watch one of these video's it makes me want to buy a ticket on amtrak.
😂 😆
You should watch some Amtrak videos then.
@@nathanahubbard1975 Travel is a luxury not necessity. Nowadays you can visit any place in the world using google maps from the comfort of your home!! And although it crashes allot, it's rarely fatal!
Exactly my thoughts.
Amtrak has issues too with motor vehicles being stuck on the tracks.
Nice hard bouncy landing when the landing gear is toast.
The audio from MK 1602 sends chills to my very core. How that company remained in business until 2010 baffles me.
Typical for an independent freight company. They are not "the cream of the crop".
Crazy how that whole crew on the MK Airlines cargo 747 effed up that bad. Any experienced 747 pilot would look at those numbers spat out by the computer and realize it was bullshit. Reduced power takeoff while at full weight, that would raise an immediate red flag. There were three brains that didn't catch that IMO very obvious mistake.
What happened to the original The Flight Channel creator ?
He probably sold his channel
What makes you think it's a different person?
@@malcolm5514 compare this with his older video
@@malcolm5514this channel has been running for several years, all the uploads in the last 12 months are just re-uploads of the originals but here’s the catch, it includes half the enthusiasm, detail and engagement that made this the best Aviation incident channel at the time. Old owner used to even do “Season” trailers, to highlight his dedication and inspiration to make videos, would go above and beyond. I cannot speak on the new owner but it’s just copy and paste and taking away all the good parts of it lol
@@PatTalisman Re "copy and paste", I noticed awhile back that one of the _other_ flight incident channels lifts whole sections word-for-word from wikipedia where one simply has to look up the airline flight numbers to get the history; that's the only homework that the other channel does.
From the final ICAO report (MK Airlines 1602):
"The CVR was found under debris in its mounting bracket near its installed location, and it had been exposed to fire and extreme heat for an extended period. The recording tape had melted; consequently, no CVR information was available to investigators. Although this model of recorder was not required to meet the more stringent fire test requirements that exist today, the conditions of extreme heat were such that the likelihood of any tape-based recorder surviving in those conditions is considered very low."
That audio present on your video is a recreation
Is there a particular reason why you won't tell us what happened to the passengers/crew on board when there are fatalities?
Didn't used to be, fatalities were listed in the old days.
Older video had it
They all got promoted to Southwest
@@mainmansentertainment They all got promoted to Ryanair to learn proper safety
The PanAm one was new to me.
Same
TransAm was from Pontiac. R.I.P.
I was busy watching the Boston Red Sox win their 1st World Series since 1918. I don't remember this at all.
The second plane ✈️ made safe ! Sorry for the first one.
Thank you flight ✈️ Channel. Keep up the good work 👍❤️!
What good work? A ton less detail in these videos now and not to mention I don't even remember the last time a non re-upload was posted
So what happened to the first one?
Everyone got the stairway to heaven?
That is correct yes
I remember that Pan Am accident from when I was a kid in the Bay Area. The two passengers who were injured when that thing ripped through the fuselage, one of them was a soldier or Marine and he was very badly injured. BTW what is the music playing at the end? I like it so much but none of my music identification apps recognize it.
Ok now i accept that this channel is dead & just keeps on reuploading his older videos!😢
PanAm one was new to me.
The PanAM 747 is really weird one. If you use more flaps your v1 and vr speeds are lower. So if you have the the old speeds it should not matter that much. In the MK airlines cargo crash it was obvious that they wanted to rotate with speed too slow to rotate (they were under the V1 and VR) the PanAM is the exact opposite. They were over that V1 and VR speeds...
Why blast jet noise in the very first second of the video?!?! How about a headphones warning
And the pilots didn't realize their aircraft was about 100 metric tons over their incorrectly calculated weight, until it was too late :-(
Thanks for the video
Was nice to see no one got harmed on that (July 30 1971, I wasn't on their earth yet) flight at least. I cannot understand the technicalities but I watched because I didnt know there were cargo alone flights too..like they had only cargos there - fish, lawn movers etc. I thought ships were used for such things. There were only 5-7 people on board to transport these cargo. How brave these crew members are- they can go alone to such longer distances & be back. I would go deranged flying alone in such spaces. I cannot even imagine going alone in cars in forested or even road areas by myself all alone..On planes when we travel economy, we have so so so many people around us, it makes us feel social. I am so amazed by these crew members, what do they do on such long distance flights with so less of them there, with so much cargo to be responsible for! I would literally get crazy..
Well, think about it: what's on Fedex and UPS planes? There are more of these kind of companies.
At least they kept trying to take off. Full power and pulling back on the controls. They never gave up! Lol
Both of these mishaps were 100% preventable if the aircrew had just followed the established procedures.
how many crashes due to incorrectly calculated takeoff power requirements? Use full power until positive rate of climb, then back off to a calculated rate of climb power.
No wonder videos aren’t as popular anymore, this guy keeps reuploading.
EDIT: Because I started a war, I want to clear something up. I don’t necessarily want Air Crash videos, I would do just fine with other av-related content from this channel. I’m a long time viewer so that’s why I’m not happy with reuploads. And no, I don’t want more planes to crash so we can have more videos. That’s heartless.
why do they keep doing this with no dates. Disgusting and click bait. I at 83 years old am getting real sick and tired of social media. Drama to the max!!!!!!
Why dont you start your own channel and do it better then? Staggering entitlement.
@@Richard.oo7Me?
@@Richard.oo7 get out of here bro, not matter what you say, this channel is dead with re uploads. me i just stay tuned ti see which video he will upload.
They do it for the TH-cam money plain and simple!
I love the vids
No
Me too. Their graphics make it easy for us laypeople to understand.
@@nanyanghuayi no
@@nanyanghuayi agreed
Although these incidents happened years ago I was sitting with my heart in my mouth. These videos are so brilliantly put together. Thank you. I'm off to read up on what happened to the crew of the second incident.
Heart in my mouth..hehe.
RIP TheFlightChannel
Thanks for saving me re-watching as mother re-upload, guys!
DUDE INSTEAD OF REUPLOADING YOU CAN BRING BACK THE FLIGHT SIMULATOR SERIES.. I LOVED THOSE SERIES
I think they sold the channel and its some bum running the channel just reuploading
At 7.55 it says that the available runway for take-off starts at the displaced threshold. This is false; that part of the runway is not available for landing, but OK for take-off.
put this one on your list. TNFlygirl Crash 7 Dec 2023 N5891J...not sure if the complete investigation is done
"when in doubt, flat out" Colin McRae.... So, if in doubt about the length of the runway being sufficient for a safe take off, go flat out, at full throttle, to minimize the risk of runway overun...
Make video about AirSerbia Embraer incident
@TheFlightChannel What's the name of the song @11:21??
It's "Speed of Light" by Caleb Etheridge. He has a channel here on YT.
Wait. What? They are *THAT* heavily loaded, having trouble getting airborne and they increase thrust to 92%? They were trying to take off at *_less_* than 92%? Why didn't they just begin at 100% thrust?
I subscribed to you a long time ago but I haven't watched any in my feed for at least a year. The engine sounds are just too invasive, it's a real shame too because I clearly subscribed for a reason.
Just a bit of feedback, obviously some people will like it but it's just like the vacuum cleaner sound to me, sends me up the wall
I used to be able to watch these but my anxiety makes me have to stop half way 😂
If it's past the point of no return but doesn't take off on rotation, wouldn't it make more sense to put the nose back down onto the runway, open the throttles wide and gather more speed before trying again?
I was thinking the same thing!
Well unless you have a time machine...
Vision in hindsight is always 20/20
@@ats-3693 20/04 in this case
The other option would have been to reject the take off at this point. Which is also contrary to the way pilots are trained to fly aircraft.
It takes a special kind of stupid to insist on trying to take off when it definitely does not want too.
After V1 they have no choice but take off. Mentour pilot recently explained it in his video. Basically it is about statistics.
@@user-yt198 It's called decision speed for a reason.
The Air Force had a pilot at Wright Patterson AFB on a stopover, take off in a FB-111 and struck a goose. The pilot knew the plane was damaged and brought it back down to the runway. He ran out of runway and tore out the front landing gear but did not destroy the plane. It was later determined if he had attempt to continue flying the plane would have crashed before he could return to land it.
th-cam.com/video/7l0d1LlihAg/w-d-xo.htmlsi=KD0LN24b-_DmmYOs
An example of a pilot doing what you suggest is the right thing.
"A special kind of stupid" as you phrase it in the Spantax 995 scenario was safer, but sadly the pilots didn't know that at the time. "A special kind of stupid" would mean people in the plane and on the ground would have been alive. idk about you, but if you need to be a "special kind of stupid" to saves people's lives, I'm going to be the biggest goddamn idiot you've ever seen.
Where did you get those airport sceneries from?
They use a BLT to calculate the takeoff speeds?
beef lettuce tomato
Yeah, they got it from Ma's Diner.
@@soggypancake001 No, its bacon, lettuce, and tomato.
@@deepthinker999 it is? where im from it isnt lol
This occurred in Flin Flon International Airport which is in Canada
Yeah. I was wondering about that, too. WHAT became of part one of this upload?????
This account is slowly degrading and it’s just sad
Flight 1602 RIP 7 souls.
1601 is a popular US street name. Infact I think they like 1600 for some reason. I think I read 1601 and not 1602. I like 362 number for some reason. I don't really know why but I kept getting that number in jumbled orders wherever I went. 236 263 326 362 623 632 these six numbers. I don't know what is the mystery of these numbers. They all add up to number 11 then to 2. 2 is not even popular or special like 3. Don't know how to understand the mystery. I don't actually like numeral 2. It gets divided or divides others. What do you think it means?!
Can’t you do QR161 or Latam 800 bro?
Ooh an upload
Reupload
@@ElectricGalaxyso? They probably want to get more views to see how it will preform
@@757Aviation. RE UP LOAD.
@@757Aviation. yes, they are trying to squeeze as many views out of this channel without any effort.
What airline is it
He has made that one
nice content farm you got there
Yep, expected, atleast the channel didn’t stop posting abruptly.
1971 was back in the day when Cali still existed, before sinking into the ocean and giving AZ ocean front property.
I know! I lived in the Bay Area at that time and watched this event live on TV that day. Got out in time and live in AZ now!
Those poor fish
In cases of fish, they may want to crash over waters to make it easier for fish at least to get back home safely. I hope they were canned.
wow
Why didn’t the pilots slow down and stop the plane???? Why do they keep going and going???
Why you dont use Felis 747 for cockpit also?
If I notice that the plane isn't taking off... why don't I increase the throttle?
I thought the pan am one was the second 747
Should have went to full throttle to begin with instead of 92%
Stop with the teaser at the beginning, I already clicked on your video. Or tell me the reasoning.
When will there be a video of Korean Airlines 007
For this site to survive he needs to look into all aviation. War planes, history etc. if he doesn’t, this channel will die unfortunately.
0:36 1601?
The heck is a body gear?
well if the pilot didn't realize he wasn't rotating by climbing he must be a stupid pilot.
All of you reupload complainers …don’t watch. You have seen it. Some of us haven’t. It’s not about you.
and its not about you either, its about all of us, if you haven't watch it then go and watch it. he should stop re uploading and make new stuff
you know all the old uploads are still here, just browse the video section. Many excellent ones.
Us "complainers" are longtime viewers who once loved this channel but are upset now due to the lack of new content
@@asan4628 actually
I still say stop crying and watch other content if you’re unhappy.
😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮
That emergency ingflatable escape looks like a flag...is that for real ?
Yup
Yup
Feet?
lawn tractors ?????
Somebody knows what happened with the channel owner?
He doesn’t respond or heart comments anymore and the videos are pure reuploads. TH-cam pages get sold all the time and this has the markings of a sell, where the new owners just try to use it for passive income, and rehash the old vids.
@@BeverlyDTVI feel bad for anyone who is a Patreon. This was my favourite flight channel to watch.
I miss them!!
the name of the channel should change to re upload master aviation edition
Wish there was actual narration vs how this channel puts out videos
Nice content, and don't listen to them haters
It's reuploads
You just ignorant
October 14. This happened on my mother's birthday. 🎂
I like October. It is a beautiful month. Infact more than October, September has beautiful skies with amazing stars lighting up the sky. I don't know why they made October Sky movie instead of September Sky?
Reupload🤦♂️
Go full power anyways on takeoff, then reduce EPR
Nice reupload
Heyyy
A rotation speed of a 747-200 at typical weights should be in the 160-180 knot range. A rotation speed of 130 knots? The crew should have caught that one....
Airlines these days are very careful about how speeds are calculated. They can be calculated in the cockpit, but most companies these days have automated systems that merge weight and balance data with local ATIS and present the speeds to the crew via ACARS. Even with that, we are taught to ask ourselves "Does that sound right?".
the reupload channel presents....
Don’t hate on them bro, there are only so many plane incidents that have ever occurred
@@Recoverlerbotines you have google right? go and do a search on the total number of air crashes that have happened and then tell me
He isn't hating
@@Recoverlerbotines BS.. au2553 remains undone and is a terrible accident
another human error, FSF is needed full self flying.
1st
And?
Biden loses
@@Lauriedriver report such spammers
@@monilparikh5171 oh yes. Such a spammer. Anyone can view my comment history
@@richardguinan3298 awe look at you trying so hard. Didn't he already lose ? Lol
If the rumours are true and the original creator sold this channel that is fine.
However reuploading videos that were previously created is lazy and will result in decreased subscriber base.
At least try and make a video that you have created and stop milking the dead cow.
If you're reading this, Video editor, I am not the only one saying it , your videos have really really gone down in quality. The music you choose, the lack of originiality between 2 videos. Everything has made this "Just another" instead of "One of the best" . Make the change. Or you will lose subscribers. Me ? Since I made this comment I'll wait for 2 more videos and then I will unsubscribe if theres no difference in production quality.
It's Microsoft flight simulator, not animated or edited 🤡
@@Dadwatermeloncatit is likely it is xplane instead of
Also music must have been changed due to copyright
@@Macster14 Msfs or xplane but definitely not animated
How about you start your own channel and show us how it is done 😅
what is wrong with you lately
He's not here
Repeats are for television. This channel needs new. B52 over Vietnam, stealth over Iraq. Just saying.
You can’t watch the video if you’re reading. Narration PLEASE!!!
Unsubscribed.
"don't recommend channel" selected.
RIP Flight Channel
747 not at full power? Even tho aircraft not flying off the ground? 'Balls to the wall', please but no..
They never show the whole video. Bogus. BS..
The new owner of this channel sucks. BRING BACK THE OLD OWNER!
Just here for the whiny “reupload” comments
Get better
Every 1 press unsuscribe this is getting ridiculous
Really irritating that this video keeps jumping backwards and forwards in time. Do you think you're some kind of hot-shot Hollywood movie director? You're not. Just stick to telling the story, and everyone will be able to follow more easily. 😉
Lol another re-upload
As someone who used to watch this channel everyday as soon as a video came out, this is so disappointing, GIVE ME SOMETHING NEW FOR ONCE PLEASE and btw @martinilopezl YES, THE REUPLOAD CHANNEL. PRESENTS... ANOTHER REUPLOAD-
NGL I think the original creator sold the channel or something cuz he used to make good and new content, now it's constant repeating, AND THERE IS MORE STUFF THAT HE CAN COVER, like old crashes from like the 1930s, the oldest one was when 2 planes collided and crashed in the Grand canyon, IM SURE THERE WERE OTHER PLANES BACK THEN THAT CRASHED TOO