Salamat sir...panginoon ang magbibigay ng papapala sa iyong kabutihan... kami hindi mo students pero nakilala ka namin sir dahil sa vlog mo na lectures.. refresher po ako sir preparing the bar..
hi atty. regarding pnb-interest rates case, the stipulation on "if we do not hear from you in xxx days, we will deem this as acceptance of the rates..." is this kind of stipulation proper? tia.
Yes, that is a valid stipulation but there must be proof that the borrower actually received the notice and the borrower was given reasonable time to object or reject the new rates. Saka lang mag-apply yung silence means yes rule
Hi! Thank you for watching the video. To that problem, the trust agreement between XYZ Bank and ABC Corp. is void because it circumvents the law/regulation against banks owning excess real properties. They entered into the said agreement to "warehouse" the properties para hindi mapansin ng BSP. Since the purpose is illegal, the agreement is void. For the case that inspired the problem, you can check Tala Realty vs. Banco Filipino, G.R. No. 137533, November 22, 2002.
1:01:02 Mistake or error 1:07:40 violence 1:09:03 intimidation 1:15:57 undue influence 1:19:45 Fraud 1:26:45 Object Will edit later kapag matapos ko na ang vid
1:19:44 KINDS OF FRAUD=D CAUSANTE IS THE ESSENTIAL(fraud atbtime, deception; D incidente fraud in the per of obli the debtor or cr commited representation
![[UNCUT] The Loyal Pin ปิ่นภักดิ์ EP.6 (1/4)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/m05kZ2GDKXg/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank you again, Atty. Jumrani for sharing your legal knowledge. God bless you.
Salamat sir...panginoon ang magbibigay ng papapala sa iyong kabutihan... kami hindi mo students pero nakilala ka namin sir dahil sa vlog mo na lectures.. refresher po ako sir preparing the bar..
Thank you! Good luck to you! :)
Ulit ulit ko pinapanood sir it... salamat talaga sa lecture mo na ganito..
You're welcome. And thank you din. Keep on watching ☺️
Thanks atty!! don't have a good foundation in Oblicon so this helps a lot!! ❤️❤️
You're welcome! 😊
l
Thank you Atty. Always looking forward for your next vlog.
Thank you so much Atty.! Watching from Negros Occidental! God bless!
You're welcome! :)
the best lawyer for me..i will definitely see you once I took my oath...
Thanks! I’m honored by your compliment. All the best to you! 🙏
Tnx po sir..big help..more vids pa sir ganda kasi na pagka explain.thanks
Thank you Atty sa lecture na to. Such a big help☺️
You're welcome and thanks for watching. God bless! ☺️
Thank you Atty.
Add to stock knowledge. Salamat po atty..
You're welcome :)
Thank you po, Atty!
napakadaling intindihin.. wag kang magsasawang tumulong atty. al!
You're welcome! Happy to help! 😊
Thank you Atty
Thanks a lot atty. Godspeed
Welcome!
Thank you atty...
YES
Thanks sir 💕
Whats the next video po? Im looking for the answer to the exercises for me to compare my answers.
Thank u atty!.
Thanks sir
hi atty. regarding pnb-interest rates case, the stipulation on "if we do not hear from you in xxx days, we will deem this as acceptance of the rates..." is this kind of stipulation proper? tia.
Yes, that is a valid stipulation but there must be proof that the borrower actually received the notice and the borrower was given reasonable time to object or reject the new rates. Saka lang mag-apply yung silence means yes rule
33:57 Potestative conditions are VOID
Good day, Pañero. May I include your lecture videos as additional references in our syllabus in Obligation and Contracts? Thank you.
Hi pañero. Yes, you may. Hope they will help. Regards to your classes! ☺️
@@TheHowsofLaw Thank you very much pañero.☺
san po makikita yung part 1 (obligations). thank you.
46:34 elements
Hi po Sir! Thank you for the lecture po. :)
Ask ko lang po kung ano ang sagot sa 3rd question? ( XYZ bank v. ABC corp. ) Thank you po
Hi! Thank you for watching the video. To that problem, the trust agreement between XYZ Bank and ABC Corp. is void because it circumvents the law/regulation against banks owning excess real properties. They entered into the said agreement to "warehouse" the properties para hindi mapansin ng BSP. Since the purpose is illegal, the agreement is void. For the case that inspired the problem, you can check Tala Realty vs. Banco Filipino, G.R. No. 137533, November 22, 2002.
@@TheHowsofLaw Thank you Sir! :) More power to you po
1:01:02 Mistake or error
1:07:40 violence
1:09:03 intimidation
1:15:57 undue influence
1:19:45 Fraud
1:26:45 Object
Will edit later kapag matapos ko na ang vid
2:32:21 Art1358 Not less than p500
1:19:44 KINDS OF FRAUD=D CAUSANTE IS THE ESSENTIAL(fraud atbtime, deception; D incidente fraud in the per of obli the debtor or cr commited representation
12:28