Revolutionizing DEADGUY ALE In Premodern!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 65

  • @goblinguidemtg
    @goblinguidemtg ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Deadguy in premodern is really fun deck)

  • @souiukotoka
    @souiukotoka ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sube más vídeos de Premodern por Dios! Que estoy viciadisimo y últimamente me das las dosis cada 3 semanas jajaja. Por cierto me he montado la Goblins RG tal como la jugaste en los playoff y es un cañón. Por cierto he buscado un vídeo en el que haces un 5-0 con Goblins y no lo he encontrado....

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Me alegro que te estén gustando los videos! La verdad que el formato es una delicia, y mientras más lo juego más me gusta! Creo que el video que estás buscando es este: th-cam.com/video/dCB_Ptdk0-Y/w-d-xo.html
      Un abrazo grande!

    • @souiukotoka
      @souiukotoka ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@fpawluszmtgSIIIII GRACIAS!!! Que pedazo de video! Es la pera todos los match difíciles que hay y como al final le das la vuelta!

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@souiukotoka Jajaja si, Goblins es realmente un mazo genial para tener como uno de los pilares del formato. Siempre genera juegos espectaculares

  • @chenhennig7673
    @chenhennig7673 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    love ur premodern content

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you!!!

  • @omegapen
    @omegapen 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    what do you think of cuttung dustbowl for more reflecting pool to play maybe 2 tsabos web in the main ?

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You could certainly do that! I do think that needing to resolve your answer to manlands does come with a subset of problems, though, especially against control decks.

  • @TeofilzKatowic
    @TeofilzKatowic ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you!

  • @wimdeboer4184
    @wimdeboer4184 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Basically this is UW control but the counters are swapped for discard and removal.

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If every control deck is UW control then yes. This is a control deck, and that's what control decks do :P

    • @wimdeboer4184
      @wimdeboer4184 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@fpawluszmtg My thought was more like, "it looks as much like UW control as it looks like Deadguy Ale".
      Seeing the matches play out sort of conform it for me as well. The strength came a lot from White control. And it meshed very well with the other components.
      Biggest challenge might've been drawing business spells (which Dragon only does indirectly, leaving 2 Scrying fir actual draw).

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@wimdeboer4184 Certainly, as I explained in the deck tech the name "PDGA" is more of a bit or meme than anything else. The proper name would be something along the lines of BW Control.

  • @issmoul931
    @issmoul931 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What do you think of wild fire against control decks?

  • @lp2156
    @lp2156 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Funny, I'm playing around with BW control as well. Somewhat similar to this.

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  ปีที่แล้ว

      I feel like this is kind of uncharted territory, and there's a lot to explore here!

    • @lp2156
      @lp2156 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree. A control deck that uses Vindicate just seems awesome in a format that's already a bit slow and which sees a big mix of creatures, artifacts and enchantments. Also Verdict being a sure 2 for 1 is intriguing. @@fpawluszmtg

  • @joel.herrick
    @joel.herrick ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow they fixed Skeletal Scrying!? That's really exciting

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I know! You love to see it!

    • @Rorschachqp
      @Rorschachqp ปีที่แล้ว

      How was it broken? I played this card since Odyssey in MBC and any other appropriate format deck.

    • @joel.herrick
      @joel.herrick ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Rorschachqp mtgo previously did not let you pay X mana when casting the card. So it did nothing.

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  ปีที่แล้ว

      I think that MTGO would not allow you to exile cards to pay for the cost, or it would only allow you to X=0. It was something along those lines.@@Rorschachqp

    • @Rorschachqp
      @Rorschachqp ปีที่แล้ว

      @@joel.herrick Hilarious.

  • @Litotryptor
    @Litotryptor ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm a great fan!

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you very much!

  • @issmoul931
    @issmoul931 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    100% in for the 4th reb...

  • @davidwolfe7810
    @davidwolfe7810 ปีที่แล้ว

    Prime Time and Exalted Angel are both drowning and you can only save one. Who do you save Fran?!

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  ปีที่แล้ว

      Damn, really asking the hard questions over here... If I can play Primeval Titan in a format pre-2022 then I save Prime Time. If I have to play today's Modern then I'd much rather leave happily ever after with my Angel in the Premodern sanctuary.

  • @andreaandreoni2072
    @andreaandreoni2072 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Make a vid with stasis deck

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry, but even though I enjoy playing against Stasis, it's not at all the kind of deck I'm interested in, so it's pretty unlikely I'll play it.

  • @bazejruba8750
    @bazejruba8750 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No consideration for Arena?

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  ปีที่แล้ว

      Definitely thought about it, but I don't want to turn on opposing Disenchants. Scrying just feels like a better fit for this deck.

  • @djsk244
    @djsk244 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Deck looks fun, but dont you just straight up get hosed by Mox Diamond decks and landstill? since you dont run arenas and have less strong t1 plays

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  ปีที่แล้ว

      With the Junk version of the deck Landstill was close to a bye, and I expect that this deck would be fairly similar. Dragon + Decree is a great way to beat Landstill, and this deck pairs that with Duress and even Haunting Echoes. Armageddon is close to unbeatable, though, you're correct there.

  • @milesgreb3537
    @milesgreb3537 ปีที่แล้ว

    "1 drop" drops are permeants, :P

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don't know what this means, haha

    • @milesgreb3537
      @milesgreb3537 ปีที่แล้ว

      @fpawluszmtg oh no biggy. Just saying you called Duress ans Swords 1 drops. But a drop Is a permanent. So like mogg fanatic is a one drop. Ya know?

    • @WarHero56
      @WarHero56 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@milesgreb3537 that's not how it works. 1 drop just means 1 mana spell

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@milesgreb3537 1 drops are cards that cost 1 mana, not necessarily permanents. At least that's how I've heard it used in the many years I've been playing and streaming the game.

    • @TheDevlain
      @TheDevlain ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fpawluszmtg 1 drops are 1 mana active cards (mostly creatures, but they could be enchantments or artifact too I guess), not reactive cards. We could stretch a little bit this definition and say that duress is a 1 drop in this format because we almost never use it defensively, but it's kinda the limit of the definition.
      I'd rather say that the deck have answers from the first turn.

  • @marcrabazagairi2650
    @marcrabazagairi2650 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Man are you then the inventor of “BW control” deck ???

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think so. Maybe somebody played it before me, but if they did I have no idea. I evolved it during my attempts to make Deadguy Ale a playable deck 😅

    • @marcrabazagairi2650
      @marcrabazagairi2650 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Amazing man, what is the final list u are playing? Can we see it somewhere like mtg8? Man do u think you can improve it a bit more?

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@marcrabazagairi2650 Honestly I developed the deck over a couple of months through different iterations, and after I got it to a point where I thought it was a very solid choice (which also happens to be the cheapest deck in the entire format, which turned out to be a very nice bonus!) I basically stopped playing it. I still have it built at home, but haven't played or iterated on it for at least 6 months or so...

    • @marcrabazagairi2650
      @marcrabazagairi2650 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@fpawluszmtg ostras pues felicidades por haberlo creado !! Un exito! y estoy muy intrigado por ver si se puede mejorar mas , o si ya ha llegado a su tope de optimizacion…

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@marcrabazagairi2650 Gracias! El mazo terminó siendo mejor de lo que esperaba, para ser sincero! Me parece que las optimizaciones que el mazo puede continuear recibiendo van a ser siempre dependientes de como evolucione el meta. Como todo mazo control, mientras más claro esté contra que mazos debe prepararse más éxito podrá tener.

  • @QuicksilverSG
    @QuicksilverSG 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Slow Brew Ale

  • @tohomarujiahito7796
    @tohomarujiahito7796 ปีที่แล้ว

    U don't side in tornos vs replenish deck.... come on

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  ปีที่แล้ว

      Enchantress is not a Replenish deck, it's a deck that play 1 or at most 3 Replenishes. I already have Furnaces and Haunting Echoes, it gets to a point where I'd have too many cards that only interact with Replenish, and I may just end up dying to my opponent just casting their enchantments. I would probably bring in Tormod's ig I were playing other deck, or I could see an argument for bringing it over a Furnace as well.

  • @richardwilhoyt6389
    @richardwilhoyt6389 ปีที่แล้ว

    PDA

  • @TheMaxZakh
    @TheMaxZakh ปีที่แล้ว

    I dunno, stasis is pretty boring to play against and watch.

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      For all of the reasons I explained while I played the match you can see why I don't agree. The fight happens on such an interesting axis, and what matters constantly changes as the game progresses. Being able to understand these shifts is extremely interesting to me. But if you don't like it then well, it's ok.

    • @TheMaxZakh
      @TheMaxZakh ปีที่แล้ว

      @fpawluszmtg I always appreciate the content either way. Stasis is part of the meta and this version was more equipped for it for sure.

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@TheMaxZakh I have yet to find a Premodern deck I don't like to play against since I always find something cool or interesting about every matchup, but I can see people hating on Stasis. I just wish those folk would see and find all of these interesting things as cool as I do.

    • @alexanderhooker163
      @alexanderhooker163 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sometimes I’d agree but the match here was definitely a good chess match

    • @fpawluszmtg
      @fpawluszmtg  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alexanderhooker163 As you can probably tell by my commentary and how hooked I was during that match, I certainly agree!