Ding and Carlsen Kingwalk in Armageddon | Norway Chess 2024
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2024
- This instructive Armageddon chess game between Ding Liren and Magnus Carlsen from the 2024 Norway Chess Tournament features strategic play in the English Opening. In the opening, the d4 square becomes highly significant. Watch as Carlsen executes a timely knight maneuver into that outpost. Shortly after Ding provokes weaknesses on Carlsen's kingside, the attention shifts to potential pawn breaks on a4 and g5. In the major piece specific endgame, Ding and Carlsen both kingwalk seeking safe havens on the queenside.
#MagnusCarlsen #DingLiren #2024NorwayChess #EnglishOpening
Image of Magnus Carlsen by Lennart Ootes
lennartootes.com
★ LICHESS.ORG lichess.org/@/...
★ CHESS.COM www.chess.com/... (affiliate link)
★ TWITCH / chessnetwork
★ TWITTER / chessnetwork
★ FACEBOOK / chessnetwork
★ PATREON / chessnetwork
★ DONATE www.paypal.com...
Been loving these consistent uploads in the past year , I was binging your old ones
👍
I like to binge too from time to time
Ditto! I can watch a video every day
Thanks Gerry. I went from 1200 to 1500 watching agar.. You put me to 1900 just by you're. demeanor manner and voice, the best teacher is one who is spoken camly. Love from Ireland brother ✌✌
Nice improvement Gary. Shoot for 2K now 😎 💪
Jerry, you have such an amazingly relaxing voice. Perfect for chess!
Great presentation. Love how Carlsen is playing the format, but still wants to win outright.
With the knight-bishop trade on move 20, I feel like some players can get really hung up on a strong knight or bishop like that being unwilling to trade it, but if you aren't willing to actually use the knight when given the chance, it's not worth as much in that position as it seems
Well done. Thanks for the walk.
Royal couples and pawn walls ending is pretty nice. I dont often see games where both sides only have queens and pawns left
Please cover Carlson vs Liren game collapse
Why offer a dark square bishop exchange? Isn't that a good bishop for a terrible bishop?
Jerry, on move 56 for black you described it as the queen returning to defend against perpetual check, but that can't be right since "black had draw odds." Am I missing something? Also, on move 51, would Qd2 have been better for white?
At 7:42 when discussing the knight takes bishop, would it be worth it for black to keep that forward d4 knight since he has his light squared bishop readily available to counter white’s light squared bishop?
Jerry, when you go into sidelines and variations, is it because of what the Opponents say in interviews afterwards; or is it “best play” you figure out yourself (with or without aid from the computer)? Or all three?
Anyway thanks.
The vast majority is coverage of best play with the assistance of Stockfish. I try to focus mainly on potential turning points, and instructional moments.
Jerry is the best
Ding got crushed where videos?
armageddon mmhhh i see
Do not be surprised Ding is either beating Magnus or drawing. He is the current world champion
How to avoid getting perpetual checks? be you the one who gives perpetual checks :P
★★★★★★☆❤
86% = B 😎
Finally I am the first comment :). Thanks for your videos Jerry. They are very instructive.
🥇 Thank you
I don´t understand why he didn´t land the perpetual sooner
Ego maybe?
@@looinrimswhat is ego in that???magnus may be was just calculating can he win the game while he was collecting those pawns
@@nikhildawani2913 but in an armageddon is the same to win that to draw (with black peaces), so yeah, i´d say ego as well... just make the draw and win the arma...
16:21 Why would black need to 'defend' against a perpetual? You then go on to say that black wins doing exactly that.
Yeah, better expressed as black was looking to win objectively even though a draw was suffice for the Armageddon format.
@@ChessNetwork thats Magnus for you, even though draw was good enough, he was still looking for winning chances 😅
Day 5 of asking Jerry to cover the Sack of Rome games by Sofia Polgar
You always sound a little annoyed at me but I have some kind of personality defect where I like it
There should be a rule against perpetual checks. I don't like them
Your comment makes zero sense, how do you make a "rule" against perpetual checks? You want a drawing game to eternity? lol