Rather than saying that Drinker and Nerdrotic are "encouraging hatred" why don't you hop on their livestream and debate them for ALL the fans to see. Then they can decide for themselves....I'm guessing the Drinker would tear you a new one and you know that too...
Angel Season 4 is one of my favorite seasons of any television show, I love how that year it and Buffy went all in on long-form storytelling, they'd always done arcs of course and had a seasonal Big Bad but Buffy's war with the First was a near-perfect ending. Meanwhile a different apocalypse descends on LA, love it then the twist that it's a "happy" dystopia is clever because it counters The First's hate filled plans. But apart from the dichotomy between shows, I love that the season finally gave us an Angelus arc (and bonus for Faith's return) and even if The Beast was kind of an excuse to have that happen, he was a pretty cool "Big Bad" misdirect (better than Prof. Walsh or The Trio in Buffy) and the concept of Blotting out the sun is pretty epic. Although, I'll concede the "birthing pains"/"misdirection" explanation for the apocalyptic events was slightly cringe (even if it did fit the shows established magic system), the flashback sequences from Inside Out where the team deduce how "Cordy" has deceived them always gives me chills. That's not even mentioning Skip's explanation of the Beastmaster's scope and musings on "free will" or Gina Torres' portrayal of Jasmine, which is insane to think she was only in 4 eps.
Really? only Mad Dany about GoT was? So I guess the Night King stupid demise was not important, neither the "Who has a better story" line... They basically destroy all characters. Not just one...
Dany-T was about the only thing that they did get right, and it had been foreshadowed for the entire season. It might have been handled a bit clumsily, and like everything else was rushed, but it wasn't out of character or out of nowhere.
I remember people being so angry by the Dallas 'twist'! It had to be the LAZIEST tv writing ever. There were so many other ways they could have brought Bobby back, but they chose to make it all a dream! All the storylines from the previous year were immediately dropped, because it turned out they were all part of Pam's 'dream'! 😂😂😂 Dallas' biggest tv rival, 'Dynasty', then placed a full-page add of two characters in an unlikely romantic pose. The caption said: 'This is no dream.' Brilliant ad!
In their defence, I don't think it was the cliche back then that it is now. Dallas is in part how people *learned* that "it was all a dream" is a twist best avoided.
I wouldn't say GoT was a 'plot twist', just bad writing. Dany was always going down that road, it was just rushed. The REAL plot twist in GoT was that Bran became king. Which was just....no. Absolutely not. He literally doesn't care about anything or anyone. He should be lord of whispers, sure. But not a KING.
I haven't read the books. Based purely on the TV show there was no reason to expect her to go down that road. TV Dany had her flaws but none of those pointed towards her becoming the sort of person who would murder innocent civilians. Stuff like her alienating the (I think?) Tullys by going "join me or die" to catured soldiers, I totally buy. Dany has a very rigid sense of right and wrong. Which is exactly why the ending makes no sense.
I kind of like the end where they were all put in a cell together and they lasted about 30 seconds before they were already getting sick of each other. Seemed fitting to me.
danny was always set to be mad queen. always, your expectations are your problems. Same as with unexplained mysteries in lost - duh - they're mysteries for crying out loud
The people complaining about HIMYM somehow missed the entire point. She was NEVER an important character. She was ALWAYS just a plot device for Ted to have kids because Robin didn't want to have them. It was ALWAYS about Ted and Robin.
Left out: X-Files. There was a three episode arc, end of season 2/start of season 3, where the antagonist is in big trouble, but then in a nonsensical move, is just allowed to get away with all the crap he has pulled (murders, destroying evidence, gaslighting, etc.). It is just like if Dr. Kimble let the one armed man get away. It was at this point that the show began a slow motion slide into a cesspool and lost my interest.
fans may have been miffed off over how i met your mother ended. but, you can thank the execs at CBS for how that all turned out. Allison Hanigan has even stated this years ago about how things turned out was not how it was supposed to go. the original plan was going to be much different.
3 หลายเดือนก่อน
Yeah, it was supposed to be Robin all along, but only after a couple of seasons. They didn't plan to become as popular :D
Rather than saying that Drinker and Nerdrotic are "encouraging hatred" why don't you hop on their livestream and debate them for ALL the fans to see. Then they can decide for themselves....I'm guessing the Drinker would tear you a new one and you know that too...
Do you think so? From what I've seen of his work, Drinker doesn't debate, he rambles. His 'points' are often superficial and fall apart if you're familiar with the details of what he's 'critiquing' and he often has a double standard where X is bad in things he dislikes and good in things he doesn't. (Example: A female character fighting and beating a male character is dumb and unrealistic. A male character single-handedly fighting and beating several (usually male) opponents is cool and badass). I'd be surprised if Drinker came out on top in an actual, proper point-by-point debate.
@@irrevenant3 damn bro, sounds like you watch a lot more Drinker than I do...and err yes a female character beating up a male is dumb and unrealistic. Remember when the female football world cup winning team got smashed 5-2 by a bunch of random under 15 year school boys. 🤣
@@irrevenant3 You don't seem to comprehend the basic fact that men and women are different, and it's FAR more likely a man would beat a group of men, than a woman 😂 But if you were being honest you'd see how people love strong women when they make SENSE, like Wonder Woman has powers, so no one complains about her being able to beat up men. Ripley is bad-ass in Alien without needing to beat up a bunch of men.
@@eldenvedetta635You misread my comment: I compared a woman beating up a single man vs a man beating up a whole bunch of other men. The latter is less realistic but gets no complaints. *Anyone* single-handedly beating up a bunch of competent opponents is highly implausible. Viewers don't criticise that, and nor should they - action movies aren't meant to be plausible. Having a weird double-standard where you expect the feats to be plausible for female main characters, while not caring how implausible they are for male main characters is weird. Obviously men and women are different. How is that relevant? The main character being unrealistically badass is the point of the genre. Also, jumping to "you don't seem to comprehend" and "if you were being honest" doesn't add anything to the conversation. Especially when you've miscomprehended the comment you're replying to.
@@The_Reality_FilterI've seen a handful of Drinker vids, which was enough to get a feel for how poorly he understand the stuff he was criticising. If you've seen even less, why are you going to bat for him winning in a debate? 😕 And you've missed my point which is the double standard. Action films (especially hand-to-hand ones) aren't about realism. They're about their protagonist being unrealistically cool and badass. Is anyone in real life capable of realistically doing what John Wick or the guys from The Fast and the Furious do without ending up dead several times over? Of course not. That's fine, rule of cool. What's less fine is rule of cool suddenly apparently not being a thing if the protagonist is an implausibly hypercompetent woman rather than an implausibly hypercompetent man. PS. How some real-life women's football team did is the opposite of the point, but no I hadn't heard that. Do you have a source, please?
Nobody realised because they mistook it for confidence and bad-assery. She only started to go off the rails when she discovered Jon surpassed her on the thrown, which was also the time it was discovered her brother didn't inherit the Targaryan madness. She did. That was the actual twist. Just a shame it was executed poorly.
@@TheMoviesWithMike You clearly where not paying attention then. She was that way all along, but she had people around her to hold her back, when they where all gone she went full mad queen.
@@andrekertesz9895it was her idea to free the slaves, she cares about the innocent even when she killed others for it, and even after her mad attack she was still happy to see John. They rushed it. It wasn’t like anything before, yes I was paying attention, and it was poor writing PERIOD
Dany had a dark side and an overly rigid standard of right and wrong. She also heavily valued freedom and protecting ordinary people. The seeds were laid for her going too far. IMO no seeds were laid for her going too far *in this way.* Dany slaughtering innocent civilians does not fit the established character.
I’m sorry, but the Gilmore Girls tv movies were worse than what was included here. They took all the Rory character development and flushed it down the toilet. Amy Sherman Palladino abandoned the original series at the end and then came back and said oh everything they did sucked. Well if you didn’t abandon the series in the original run then you could’ve done what you wanted. However, she returned for the tv movies, made Rory a cold character, had her also cheat on her bf, keeps stringing him along by saying oh I forgot to break up with him and got pregnant with someone else’s kid. Not that we will get a resolution. Amy has gotten lucrative offers to return but refuses to come back and won’t let anyone else finish the story. Sorry but if you didn’t want to give a solid resolution, then don’t come back at all. You made the show feel like a meaningless show. So I’m sorry, but she ruined the legacy with those tv movies and how she turned Rory into a cruel and careless character.
What about the one where Looper decides that The Acolyte can't be criticized by anyone but them, barely, but refuses to go into WHY people didn't like it and instead posts Disney propaganda? I'm guessing Disney threw you guys some cash.
I know right? Though I do think it happens too suddenly still. They should have made it more obvious that she is falling into despair and madness. There were a few hints throughout the last seasons but they weren't strong enough to warrant her breaking point yet.
@@Kikiricki11 yeah it did happen suddenly but I wasn’t super bothered. I wouldn’t argue with more of a build up and more foreshadowing but someone(s) got lazy and the quality was starting to fade. They wanted a quick out I think. Not an excuse, just an observation. I really need to watch the show again. I’ve only seen it during its hype and would like to binge watch sometime. It was a fun ride for those years even if you’re unhappy with the ending. I enjoyed that waiting for the next episode/season hype.
Dany "snapped, in mere seconds." Well, do none of you idiots remember WHY she snapped? She witness her BEST FRIEND--quite literally the only person in her entire life she'd ever known and cared about who had absolutely NO ulterior motives in becoming close to Dany--be BRUTALLY KILLED IN FRONT OF HER EYES. For no reason other than Cersei's own sadism. Missandei had been taken captive by Cersei's forces and used as a pawn by Cersei basically to force Dany to surrender and recognize Cersei's rule. The "defenseless people of King's Landing" suffered no less than Missandei had suffered. I am SO tired of people *conveniently* forgetting that little aspect especially when they also seem to forget Dany was sold off by her brother (so *he* could get an army to make himself the king of Westeros) and then effectively *raped* by her "husband" on their "wedding night" and then witnessing the deaths of countless innocents when she was trying to end the hold of the slave traders over the course of the series (among the frequent betrayals by people she thought were supposed to be her friends and counselors). It's truly amazing that Dany hadn't "snapped" in earlier seasons. Maybe, it's just me. But *I* actually applauded when Dany "snapped." Watching her best friend be beheaded in front of her own eyes, and NOT reacting would've been the REAL sign she'd "snapped"--because she would've just been a sociopath, showing she didn't really care about anyone, that she was really just as bad as Cersei all along. I also dare the people who were upset at Dany's reaction to give ANY kind of reasonable response she should have had. SHE WAS AT WAR WITH CERSEI. And Cersei wasn't backing down--she was willing to let Westeros burn to the ground (or freeze to the ground--remember, she didn't offer any help in fighting off the Night King) as long as SHE was recognized as the one and only, rightful Queen of Westeros.
Thank You!! Plus being rejected by Jon and how everybody seemed to forget how much she sacrificed to help them against Night King. I think after Kings Landing she could have burned down Winterfell, those ungrateful bastards LOL And don't get me started on the lame and easy way Cercei died.
Yes, we know why it happened. And we thoroughly understand Dany reacting badly. The *way* she reacted badly - i.e. mass-murdering a bunch of civilians - made no sense for her character. Especially with the Red Keep right there. If she was at war with Cersei and she was enraged at Cersei then why did she slaughter a bunch of random innocents rather than making a beeline for Cersei?
I was mad at the final of “Mad About You” - it just took the series out of the comedy genre and instantly made everything so far very unfunny (for what was left after the casual infidelity reveal). And the “it was all just a dream” also ruined “Will and Grace”, even recently. Why would they build up the relationship between Grace and Leo and her own confidence and journey as a mother, only to clean it all for the sake of a new pregnancy? I just don’t get it…
The problem with the "How I Met Your Mother Ending" is that the writers painted themselves into a corner by deciding the ending very early on and not being willing to pivot when realizing that ending wouldn't work (which is a classic writer problem). What they should have done for the ending was this. Instead of the last season being the stupid wedding plot... the entire last season should have started with the mother "Tracy" suddenly interrupting Ted's story to his kids and going "let me tell you what really happened" and then the entire season being Tracy telling stories of how she "interacted" with the main cast in ways that weren't evident when told from Ted's point of view. Ted always hinted that the mother was around in places but he just didn't see her, so now we get to see her stories. That would endear us more to the mother character while seeing our main cast from a different point of view, and then that story leading all the way back up to Barney and Robin's wedding where Ted and the mother meet for the first time and then fall in love as we see Barny and Robin get married. BOOM, done. Perfect ending.
that was probably intended toward Charisma's treatment by Joss, and that the gross plotline was some sort of punishment by Joss. Whether true or not I don't know, but I think that's what the list was referencing.
Very bad endings. I agree. Lost,GOT especially,Gossip Girl could have been handled better. It makes no sense. Gilmore Girls too. Luke should have told Lorelai about April. It should have been introduced earlier. How I Meet Your Mother stupid ending too. I agree with the user who wrote the comment
Charisma Carpenter became pregnant so the showrunner, writers had to accommodate the actor's needs. I think it was supposed to be evil Cordelia the team had to battle instead of Gina Torres' Jasmine.
Joss didn't even try to hide that he was mad at her for the pregnancy. Having her sleep with a minor was an added jab because she'd already felt disturbed having to be the love interest of a teenager on Baywatch, though Charisma's character was supposedly 10 years younger than her (and not a single person with working eyes was fooled).
@@HariSeldon913 Joss was horrible and he even had a one on one meeting with her asking if she was going to keep the baby. That was just insulting and Charisma talks about the experience she had working on Angel during Inside of you with Michael Rosenbaum and wrote that lengthy letter.
I thought the Dawn storyline was brilliant honestly, though I would have loved a flashback episode so we could see past seasons from the alt timeline of having Dawn there lol be interesting to see what would have changed.
@@irrevenant3 Dawn was a plot device to kill off Joyce. Joyce had a brain aneurysm due to the memory spell to create Dawn. She stuck around and added little value to the show. If Dawn had died at the end of season 5, it wouldn't have changed the trajectory or story of the show. So she added nothing to the show and she was obnoxious.
@@kmallory100 That's a fan theory. There's nothing to outright contradict it if you want to keep it as headcanon, but it's not indicated by the show itself and would arguably weaken the story if true. Dawn added tons to the show, not least that it means Joyce's death catapaults Buffy from being a child cared for by her mother to suddenly being the one responsible for raising a child. That's a massive life change and it had massive impacts on Buffy.
Which plot twist on this list would you say is the worst of them?
Rather than saying that Drinker and Nerdrotic are "encouraging hatred" why don't you hop on their livestream and debate them for ALL the fans to see. Then they can decide for themselves....I'm guessing the Drinker would tear you a new one and you know that too...
The one where you lie about media reviewers and then try to delete the evidence.
The one where you defamed you tubers with your nonsense.
Hey , you forgot The Acolyte. Accidentally or .......?
Angel Season 4 is one of my favorite seasons of any television show, I love how that year it and Buffy went all in on long-form storytelling, they'd always done arcs of course and had a seasonal Big Bad but Buffy's war with the First was a near-perfect ending. Meanwhile a different apocalypse descends on LA, love it then the twist that it's a "happy" dystopia is clever because it counters The First's hate filled plans. But apart from the dichotomy between shows, I love that the season finally gave us an Angelus arc (and bonus for Faith's return) and even if The Beast was kind of an excuse to have that happen, he was a pretty cool "Big Bad" misdirect (better than Prof. Walsh or The Trio in Buffy) and the concept of Blotting out the sun is pretty epic. Although, I'll concede the "birthing pains"/"misdirection" explanation for the apocalyptic events was slightly cringe (even if it did fit the shows established magic system), the flashback sequences from Inside Out where the team deduce how "Cordy" has deceived them always gives me chills. That's not even mentioning Skip's explanation of the Beastmaster's scope and musings on "free will" or Gina Torres' portrayal of Jasmine, which is insane to think she was only in 4 eps.
Weird how you can identify bad writing in other shows but not in Star Wars.
I'm so glad that I never saw Veronica Mars S4, I would have been pissed !!!
Me too. I will never watch it!!
Really? only Mad Dany about GoT was? So I guess the Night King stupid demise was not important, neither the "Who has a better story" line... They basically destroy all characters. Not just one...
Guess they went with the biggest individual character assassination or this video would be nothing but GoT.
Dany-T was about the only thing that they did get right, and it had been foreshadowed for the entire season. It might have been handled a bit clumsily, and like everything else was rushed, but it wasn't out of character or out of nowhere.
I remember people being so angry by the Dallas 'twist'! It had to be the LAZIEST tv writing ever. There were so many other ways they could have brought Bobby back, but they chose to make it all a dream! All the storylines from the previous year were immediately dropped, because it turned out they were all part of Pam's 'dream'! 😂😂😂 Dallas' biggest tv rival, 'Dynasty', then placed a full-page add of two characters in an unlikely romantic pose. The caption said: 'This is no dream.' Brilliant ad!
In their defence, I don't think it was the cliche back then that it is now. Dallas is in part how people *learned* that "it was all a dream" is a twist best avoided.
I think the Dawn twist in Buffy or the Chris being their son from the future in Charmed were also awful
What was wrong with the Dawn twist?
I wouldn't say GoT was a 'plot twist', just bad writing. Dany was always going down that road, it was just rushed. The REAL plot twist in GoT was that Bran became king. Which was just....no. Absolutely not. He literally doesn't care about anything or anyone. He should be lord of whispers, sure. But not a KING.
I haven't read the books. Based purely on the TV show there was no reason to expect her to go down that road. TV Dany had her flaws but none of those pointed towards her becoming the sort of person who would murder innocent civilians. Stuff like her alienating the (I think?) Tullys by going "join me or die" to catured soldiers, I totally buy. Dany has a very rigid sense of right and wrong. Which is exactly why the ending makes no sense.
I am sorry but for Sugar, him not being a human is hinted starting from the first episode, I already figured before the reveal.
I loved Dany. She doesn't kill the innocent little people. I was mad.
Suggestion for a video: The Best TV Shows With Terrible Final Seasons.
GOT so wins that...
GoT #1, Dexter #2
Dexter. List over.
🧢
we'll be here all day
The courtroom scene in Seinfeld was hilarious but the rest of the finale was terrible. I've never been more disappointed in a series finale.
I kind of like the end where they were all put in a cell together and they lasted about 30 seconds before they were already getting sick of each other. Seemed fitting to me.
danny was always set to be mad queen. always, your expectations are your problems.
Same as with unexplained mysteries in lost - duh - they're mysteries for crying out loud
The people complaining about HIMYM somehow missed the entire point. She was NEVER an important character. She was ALWAYS just a plot device for Ted to have kids because Robin didn't want to have them. It was ALWAYS about Ted and Robin.
The show repeatedly showed that Robin+Ted did not work. Completely pointless ending.
The only show I watch was Seinfeld.
The character assassination of Cordelia Chase was unforgivable. I’m glad they brought Charisma Carpenter back for the 100th episode.
Left out:
X-Files. There was a three episode arc, end of season 2/start of season 3, where the antagonist is in big trouble, but then in a nonsensical move, is just allowed to get away with all the crap he has pulled (murders, destroying evidence, gaslighting, etc.). It is just like if Dr. Kimble let the one armed man get away. It was at this point that the show began a slow motion slide into a cesspool and lost my interest.
I’ve always felt that Barney was the main character in HIMYM and Ted was more of an NPC narrating a story.
fans may have been miffed off over how i met your mother ended. but, you can thank the execs at CBS for how that all turned out. Allison Hanigan has even stated this years ago about how things turned out was not how it was supposed to go. the original plan was going to be much different.
Yeah, it was supposed to be Robin all along, but only after a couple of seasons. They didn't plan to become as popular :D
Killing logan was the most fucked up thing they could have done
Rather than saying that Drinker and Nerdrotic are "encouraging hatred" why don't you hop on their livestream and debate them for ALL the fans to see. Then they can decide for themselves....I'm guessing the Drinker would tear you a new one and you know that too...
Do you think so? From what I've seen of his work, Drinker doesn't debate, he rambles. His 'points' are often superficial and fall apart if you're familiar with the details of what he's 'critiquing' and he often has a double standard where X is bad in things he dislikes and good in things he doesn't. (Example: A female character fighting and beating a male character is dumb and unrealistic. A male character single-handedly fighting and beating several (usually male) opponents is cool and badass).
I'd be surprised if Drinker came out on top in an actual, proper point-by-point debate.
@@irrevenant3 damn bro, sounds like you watch a lot more Drinker than I do...and err yes a female character beating up a male is dumb and unrealistic. Remember when the female football world cup winning team got smashed 5-2 by a bunch of random under 15 year school boys. 🤣
@@irrevenant3 You don't seem to comprehend the basic fact that men and women are different, and it's FAR more likely a man would beat a group of men, than a woman 😂 But if you were being honest you'd see how people love strong women when they make SENSE, like Wonder Woman has powers, so no one complains about her being able to beat up men. Ripley is bad-ass in Alien without needing to beat up a bunch of men.
@@eldenvedetta635You misread my comment: I compared a woman beating up a single man vs a man beating up a whole bunch of other men. The latter is less realistic but gets no complaints.
*Anyone* single-handedly beating up a bunch of competent opponents is highly implausible. Viewers don't criticise that, and nor should they - action movies aren't meant to be plausible.
Having a weird double-standard where you expect the feats to be plausible for female main characters, while not caring how implausible they are for male main characters is weird. Obviously men and women are different. How is that relevant? The main character being unrealistically badass is the point of the genre.
Also, jumping to "you don't seem to comprehend" and "if you were being honest" doesn't add anything to the conversation. Especially when you've miscomprehended the comment you're replying to.
@@The_Reality_FilterI've seen a handful of Drinker vids, which was enough to get a feel for how poorly he understand the stuff he was criticising. If you've seen even less, why are you going to bat for him winning in a debate? 😕
And you've missed my point which is the double standard. Action films (especially hand-to-hand ones) aren't about realism. They're about their protagonist being unrealistically cool and badass. Is anyone in real life capable of realistically doing what John Wick or the guys from The Fast and the Furious do without ending up dead several times over? Of course not. That's fine, rule of cool. What's less fine is rule of cool suddenly apparently not being a thing if the protagonist is an implausibly hypercompetent woman rather than an implausibly hypercompetent man.
PS. How some real-life women's football team did is the opposite of the point, but no I hadn't heard that. Do you have a source, please?
Danny started her turn. In season 3 of game of thrones
That twist was rushed all to hell, there were bread crumbs but don’t act like it wasn’t dumb the way it happened
Nobody realised because they mistook it for confidence and bad-assery. She only started to go off the rails when she discovered Jon surpassed her on the thrown, which was also the time it was discovered her brother didn't inherit the Targaryan madness. She did. That was the actual twist. Just a shame it was executed poorly.
@@TheMoviesWithMike You clearly where not paying attention then. She was that way all along, but she had people around her to hold her back, when they where all gone she went full mad queen.
@@andrekertesz9895it was her idea to free the slaves, she cares about the innocent even when she killed others for it, and even after her mad attack she was still happy to see John. They rushed it. It wasn’t like anything before, yes I was paying attention, and it was poor writing PERIOD
Dany had a dark side and an overly rigid standard of right and wrong. She also heavily valued freedom and protecting ordinary people. The seeds were laid for her going too far. IMO no seeds were laid for her going too far *in this way.* Dany slaughtering innocent civilians does not fit the established character.
Seinfeld didn't have a plot twist. It was just the final episode that brought all the memorable characters back.
And considering the show was about nothing meaning there is no plot...
Why didn’t you instead name this video “the worst final seasons of popular television series“?
The last 10 min of How I met your mother annoyed me so much I can't watch any episodes of the series any more.
The Gossip Girl “twist” absolutely does make sense while you’re watching it.
I’m sorry, but the Gilmore Girls tv movies were worse than what was included here. They took all the Rory character development and flushed it down the toilet. Amy Sherman Palladino abandoned the original series at the end and then came back and said oh everything they did sucked. Well if you didn’t abandon the series in the original run then you could’ve done what you wanted.
However, she returned for the tv movies, made Rory a cold character, had her also cheat on her bf, keeps stringing him along by saying oh I forgot to break up with him and got pregnant with someone else’s kid. Not that we will get a resolution. Amy has gotten lucrative offers to return but refuses to come back and won’t let anyone else finish the story. Sorry but if you didn’t want to give a solid resolution, then don’t come back at all. You made the show feel like a meaningless show. So I’m sorry, but she ruined the legacy with those tv movies and how she turned Rory into a cruel and careless character.
What about the one where Looper decides that The Acolyte can't be criticized by anyone but them, barely, but refuses to go into WHY people didn't like it and instead posts Disney propaganda? I'm guessing Disney threw you guys some cash.
I love what you do
GoT - if you didn’t see it culminating to danny losing it you’re blind.
Season after season she was let down and betrayed, lost faith in people
I know right? Though I do think it happens too suddenly still. They should have made it more obvious that she is falling into despair and madness. There were a few hints throughout the last seasons but they weren't strong enough to warrant her breaking point yet.
@@Kikiricki11 yeah it did happen suddenly but I wasn’t super bothered. I wouldn’t argue with more of a build up and more foreshadowing but someone(s) got lazy and the quality was starting to fade. They wanted a quick out I think. Not an excuse, just an observation.
I really need to watch the show again. I’ve only seen it during its hype and would like to binge watch sometime. It was a fun ride for those years even if you’re unhappy with the ending. I enjoyed that waiting for the next episode/season hype.
Angel's Cordelia/Conner relationship/twist is definitely top 5 worst plots 🤦♂️
Agree 100%. It was so icky
Yeah that was awful.
She was possessed by an evilish god from another dimension trying to force its way into her world. I think is was supposed to disgust people.
Allegedly Joss Whedon hated that Charisma Carpenter had gotten pregnant and this was his way of 'dealing with it'.
@@donnywilliamson5807 icky? Damn, that sounds soy af
Seinfeld - the critique is as ridiculous as the show. I can’t help but laugh. Thanks😂😂😂😂
Suggestion For a Video Modern TV Classics That became famous because of Syndication broadcasts
Dany "snapped, in mere seconds." Well, do none of you idiots remember WHY she snapped? She witness her BEST FRIEND--quite literally the only person in her entire life she'd ever known and cared about who had absolutely NO ulterior motives in becoming close to Dany--be BRUTALLY KILLED IN FRONT OF HER EYES. For no reason other than Cersei's own sadism. Missandei had been taken captive by Cersei's forces and used as a pawn by Cersei basically to force Dany to surrender and recognize Cersei's rule. The "defenseless people of King's Landing" suffered no less than Missandei had suffered. I am SO tired of people *conveniently* forgetting that little aspect especially when they also seem to forget Dany was sold off by her brother (so *he* could get an army to make himself the king of Westeros) and then effectively *raped* by her "husband" on their "wedding night" and then witnessing the deaths of countless innocents when she was trying to end the hold of the slave traders over the course of the series (among the frequent betrayals by people she thought were supposed to be her friends and counselors). It's truly amazing that Dany hadn't "snapped" in earlier seasons. Maybe, it's just me. But *I* actually applauded when Dany "snapped." Watching her best friend be beheaded in front of her own eyes, and NOT reacting would've been the REAL sign she'd "snapped"--because she would've just been a sociopath, showing she didn't really care about anyone, that she was really just as bad as Cersei all along.
I also dare the people who were upset at Dany's reaction to give ANY kind of reasonable response she should have had. SHE WAS AT WAR WITH CERSEI. And Cersei wasn't backing down--she was willing to let Westeros burn to the ground (or freeze to the ground--remember, she didn't offer any help in fighting off the Night King) as long as SHE was recognized as the one and only, rightful Queen of Westeros.
Thank You!! Plus being rejected by Jon and how everybody seemed to forget how much she sacrificed to help them against Night King. I think after Kings Landing she could have burned down Winterfell, those ungrateful bastards LOL And don't get me started on the lame and easy way Cercei died.
Yes, we know why it happened. And we thoroughly understand Dany reacting badly. The *way* she reacted badly - i.e. mass-murdering a bunch of civilians - made no sense for her character. Especially with the Red Keep right there. If she was at war with Cersei and she was enraged at Cersei then why did she slaughter a bunch of random innocents rather than making a beeline for Cersei?
I was mad at the final of “Mad About You” - it just took the series out of the comedy genre and instantly made everything so far very unfunny (for what was left after the casual infidelity reveal). And the “it was all just a dream” also ruined “Will and Grace”, even recently. Why would they build up the relationship between Grace and Leo and her own confidence and journey as a mother, only to clean it all for the sake of a new pregnancy? I just don’t get it…
The problem with the "How I Met Your Mother Ending" is that the writers painted themselves into a corner by deciding the ending very early on and not being willing to pivot when realizing that ending wouldn't work (which is a classic writer problem). What they should have done for the ending was this. Instead of the last season being the stupid wedding plot... the entire last season should have started with the mother "Tracy" suddenly interrupting Ted's story to his kids and going "let me tell you what really happened" and then the entire season being Tracy telling stories of how she "interacted" with the main cast in ways that weren't evident when told from Ted's point of view. Ted always hinted that the mother was around in places but he just didn't see her, so now we get to see her stories. That would endear us more to the mother character while seeing our main cast from a different point of view, and then that story leading all the way back up to Barney and Robin's wedding where Ted and the mother meet for the first time and then fall in love as we see Barny and Robin get married. BOOM, done. Perfect ending.
Waiting for your groveling apology to The Drinker and Nerdrotic. Your vile slander deserves a lawsuit.
back to farming ? now we know your are Disney hitman ... go away
WandaVision - Ralph Boner.
Dexter.
How was it “misogynistic?”
I think you’re projecting
that was probably intended toward Charisma's treatment by Joss, and that the gross plotline was some sort of punishment by Joss. Whether true or not I don't know, but I think that's what the list was referencing.
Very bad endings. I agree. Lost,GOT especially,Gossip Girl could have been handled better. It makes no sense. Gilmore Girls too. Luke should have told Lorelai about April. It should have been introduced earlier. How I Meet Your Mother stupid ending too. I agree with the user who wrote the comment
You should do a list of WatchMojo videoes that are re-hashes of their other lists.
Dany was not a plot twist. She spent the whole series murdering thousands of people.
I stand by it that Gossip Girl & HIMYM plot twists aren't bad.
You stand alone 😂
Charisma Carpenter became pregnant so the showrunner, writers had to accommodate the actor's needs. I think it was supposed to be evil Cordelia the team had to battle instead of Gina Torres' Jasmine.
Joss didn't even try to hide that he was mad at her for the pregnancy. Having her sleep with a minor was an added jab because she'd already felt disturbed having to be the love interest of a teenager on Baywatch, though Charisma's character was supposedly 10 years younger than her (and not a single person with working eyes was fooled).
@@HariSeldon913 Joss was horrible and he even had a one on one meeting with her asking if she was going to keep the baby. That was just insulting and Charisma talks about the experience she had working on Angel during Inside of you with Michael Rosenbaum and wrote that lengthy letter.
Uh most of the show Lost was explained, idk what these people are smoking
There wasn't a carjacking in the series finale of Seinfeld. Do you even do your research?
Yes there was.
Yes there was the late comedian John Pinnette was getting mugged while in his car and the four characters just laughed and made fun of him.
Gossip Girl was never revealed in the book series. The tv show should’ve kept it that way!!
I still reckon it should've been Dorota.
Last season of GoT could have been written better by a 10 year old fanboy
I'm #1! Finally! Haha!
Would be hilarious if looper deleted your comment 😂
LAST IN LIFE
@@Justin-mb4ql Right
Lost...
"... and it was all just a dream."
The entire show of Lost was terrible
The Dawn storyline in Buffy was an awful twist. Chris being Pipers son from the future was dumb too on Charmed.
I thought the Dawn storyline was brilliant honestly, though I would have loved a flashback episode so we could see past seasons from the alt timeline of having Dawn there lol be interesting to see what would have changed.
What was awful about the Dawn storyline?
@@irrevenant3 Dawn was a plot device to kill off Joyce. Joyce had a brain aneurysm due to the memory spell to create Dawn. She stuck around and added little value to the show. If Dawn had died at the end of season 5, it wouldn't have changed the trajectory or story of the show. So she added nothing to the show and she was obnoxious.
@@kmallory100 That's a fan theory. There's nothing to outright contradict it if you want to keep it as headcanon, but it's not indicated by the show itself and would arguably weaken the story if true.
Dawn added tons to the show, not least that it means Joyce's death catapaults Buffy from being a child cared for by her mother to suddenly being the one responsible for raising a child. That's a massive life change and it had massive impacts on Buffy.
@@irrevenant3 Again, if you remove Dawn after season 5, the shows story still wouldn't have been affected. She was irrelevant and obnoxious.