ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
- SpaceX launched its Super Heavy-Starship on its fourth test flight Thursday morning. See the world's most powerful rocket lift off.
CBS News 24/7 is the premier anchored streaming news service from CBS News and Stations that is available free to everyone with access to the internet and is the destination for breaking news, live events, original reporting and storytelling, and programs from CBS News and Stations' top anchors and correspondents working locally, nationally and around the globe. It is available on more than 30 platforms across mobile, desktop and connected TVs for free, as well as CBSNews.com and Paramount+ and live in 91 countries.
Subscribe to the CBS News TH-cam channel: / cbsnews
Watch CBS News 24/7: cbsnews.com/live/
Download the CBS News app: cbsnews.com/mo...
Follow CBS News on Instagram: / cbsnews
Like CBS News on Facebook: / cbsnews
Follow CBS News on X: / cbsnews
Subscribe to our newsletters: cbsnews.com/ne...
Try Paramount+ free: paramountplus....
For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com
And to think that that thing is taller than the Statue of Liberty is insane.
Second stage Starship Spacecraft is taller than Liberty statue. If you adding Super Heavy Booster,that will be make Liberty statue to dwarf 😂
Aren't many rockets taller than the statue of liberty? Ariane rocket is 53m tall, Starship is 50m tall.
@@Damdebase The Statue Of Liberty is 93 meters tall, starship combined with its booster is 121.3 meters tall at liftoff.
@@originalusername121 right ok I guess I was comparing the statue without it's base with starship without booster, my bad 😓
Slightly taller than a rocket from 60 years ago. Progress.
Congrats to CBS for calling this test flight a success. It's a first in main stream media.
I was coming to comment the same thing. Actually shocked in a good way that the mainstream hasn’t ran with some B.S. like last time “SpaceX rocket explodes before completing mission”
It's almost like all the previous flights were failures
@@kerbalengineeringsystems7415 which they weren’t whatsoever.
It’s a shame they reported so inaccurately this time. Only SpaceX clans could consider having your spaceship melt and catch on fire during a suborbital reentry a “success.”
@@Sinistatnt They failed to achieve their primary objectives so, yes, they were failures.
The screaming sound before engine ignition is wonderful, it's the sound of the deluge system at max pressure and the blow off valve opening.
I thought it was the sound of the gates of hell opening up underneath this beast
And the screaming sound at splashdown, moreso.
I heard that and was curious what it was. Thanks for the explaination.
no, its the sound of the left of politics whining because musk dared to take away their grasp of social media manipulation.
It is crazy spaceX can do this at lightning speed compared to traditional space travel. Then you have a company like blue origin that can't even get a rocket to orbit.
Boeing is at least 10 to 20 years behind spacex right now. Boeing should be 10 years ahead of everybody since they built the space shuttles and maintain them for over 10 years. We sent people to the moon in the 70s with barely any tech. But we cant get there with now days tech, which a microwave now days has more computing power than saturn 5 rocket. Smart phones has more processing power then the space shuttles in the 90s. Blue origin min 25 years behind. Blue origin only goes sub orbit.
It's called Fast R&D. Research, build a prototype, test it, obtain results, repeat. SpaceX is able to do this because they have money and are not hard reliant on government funding.
Boeing and NASA, on the other hand, rely heavily on government funding. If they were to try the same approach with Fast R&D, one failure could cause congress to reconsider their funding, even if they yielded amazing research data from the test. (Most congressmen are not engineers. They do not understand the value of data from failure and simply observe the money as wasted.)
Yeah they use several techniques. Most specifically in my opinion is that they don't worry about getting funds and instead use stock buyers money to go directly into projects with investors usually not caring enough to make revenue from it. In a way it's kinda a massive donation fund.
@zelrex4657 SpaceX is a privately held company, though. There are no investors or stocks to be bought for it. All its money comes from its contracts with its customers or from whatever Elon Musk decides to spend on it that day.
Honestly, the reason they're probably able to turn around so fast is that they're NOT taking any investor's money or beholden to give a return to shareholders. They, rather ironically, can take more risks in blowing up their own launch vehicles in test flights and not have to give a care about their stock prices because the typical hedge fund manager is as skittish and short sighted as the typical squirrel, only able to look as far as the next quarterly report.
@@TheAndroidNextDoor they def take investors money , just because they don't sell shares to the public .. ask Ron Barron how much he has invested in spacex
Looks like we're getting closer to going to MARS. WOW, SPACE X ROCKS!!!!!!❤❤
mars is a dead rock, asteroid mining is where its at, venus cloud cities maybe
Long way
That will be fun in a spacecraft that can't even reach orbit...
Who the hell wants to go to a dead rock. Gotta be brain dead
This is the second time they've had a nominal orbital insertion. They just need a small circularization burn to be in orbit, or alternatively they could just point the rocket engines slightly differently during launch. The only reason they haven't reached orbit is that they haven't wanted to for these test flights.
Good job on CBS for staying objective, aka real journalism.
Yeah, it must be sooo tempting to talk smack when a certain someone is involved. But Space X are an amazing team and their work deserves all the praise.
@@krime2001 This is not about a certain idiot tweeting geopolitics. This is about a company reaching new goals and learning, and journalists reporting the success, instead of going 'engines blew up, and the ship melted, it is a failure'.
broken clock is right 2 times daily
Within the next year it's likely SpaceX will be able to land Starship on a pad in the ocean. Meanwhile, people still can't park in the lines in a parking lot.
There are no stated plans to land Starship on an ocean pad ala Falcon 9. Both Starship and its booster are designed to be caught. In fact Musk stated in a post flight 4 interview that given the accuracy of the boosters return they may attempt a catch for flight 5. He also stated that Starship missed the mark by 6 kilometers, although he gave no reason why.
@-insert- my point is that they'd be capable of landing it on a pad if they wanted to.
Hey stop picking on my wife😅
@@-insert- cough cough, probably the litteral burning fins but maybe not, welp still need more tests before we actually get a viable vehicle
Flat earthers : It's fake.. it's AI.
earths flat
Get a grip
Both halves also landed. Stage one hovering for a sec over the water before dropping in. State two has a fin (brobably both) burn and start to fall apart at the edge before going through a controlled landing (the fin clearly actuating despite the burn through on the edge).
This version of Starship launched with a known faulty design for the fins. They've already redesigned the fin casing to better shield the gap between the fin and the hull for better protection. With this flight, SpaceX was curious on how well the ship would hold together after and while incurring direct damage from re-entry. SpaceX had also removed two tiles and replaced another tile with a thin tile. I think SpaceX was just as surprised when Starship still had enough control from all four fins to belly flop the vehicle into position for a soft landing.
Landed as in "what goes up must come down"...
@@Ncyphen Funny thing is that if the FAA hands over the next license quickly enough, SpaceX will probably send up Ship 30 next, just to keep it from being wasted on scrapping. They can do new tests with it, like relighting Raptor in space or hovering for 20 seconds or whatever, but in the end, it's got the same flap design so those flaps would melt again. I can already see people not understanding this and making fun of SpaceX for failing to fix the problem in three weeks.
the little fin that could.
@@Asterra2 They could pitch it as a 'ratification of design and engineering by obtaining identical results'.
Awesome! This should be the main focus for human development.
This vehicle will certainly change human space flight as we know it. Amazing times to witness!
Imagine all the money and human efforts went into making amazing technology not wars
abondoning the smoldering embers of our planet we destroyed?
@frankE91210 extinction events would happen whether we were here or not, look what happened to the dinosaurs
@@gh3meister I still don't get this whole "we have to be ready to get humanity off earth in case of an extinction event" - so what if all of humanity dies out? No one left to cry about it, the universe certainly doesn't care.
Thank You For Sharing This…
the whole building was going absolutely insane .. congrats SPACE X
0:48 the schock waves in the air and through the clouds 😮🎉
the enormous mach cones? All with starsip is just big
Just amazing. We just flew for the first time around 100 years ago. Humans have been around for houndred of thousands of years so just imagine what we will do in 100 000 thousand years! Be proud!😊
I definitely think if nothing happens to us and technology keeps progressing with no stopping we will definitely already be at other stars in 100,000 years
Other galaxy’s! With 100.000 years we’re at other galaxy’s!
120 years of powered flight
it started from Ibn Firnas to this just insane .
@@MyLifeInVideos With our current understanding of physics, it'd be VERY hard to reach other stars. Even at light speed Alpha Centauri is over 4 years away. And a vessel transporting humans is unlikely to go anywhere near that fast.
Then factor in that another planet capable of supporting human life is damn near impossible.
I'd LOVE a future like that, but it's just not possible.
Right now I have tears in my eyes seeing all those Spacex boys and girls celebrating their nights and hours of calculations and simulation with mathematics.
Thank you thank you
You make me feel proud with people of science.
"successfully launches" happened 3 tests ago, should have mentioned successfully lands against all odds :)
Including a meltdown!
Seeing the shockwaves through the clouds as it climbs is so cool. Insane amount of power coming from those 32 engines
That's never happened in the 60 years I've been watching rockets fly. Like someone is trying too hard, it's fake.
@@richspillman4191 I was gonna ask if people like you have better things to do, but your comment basically answered my question for me.
@@LordDonnington725 You mean like watching fake rocket launches?
@@richspillman4191Why do you think it's fake? It's the strongest rocket to date, so it's not like it has to act the same way the past 60 years of rockets have.
@@harmonybutnomoney Like the supreme court said about obscenity "I know it when I see it..." and it's the same here, I know a fake when I see it, and this is as fake as a fake fake is fake. The fin flapping in the wind not affecting the stability of the craft, the plasma flow not matching the direction of travel, keep an open mind and let your discernment tell you if this is everything they are telling you it is. For me, I am not deceived.
Absolutely amazing, think of all the precise calculations and math used on this, congratulations to the whole team of Space X, humanity is going to Mars!!!!!!
What was that at 6:50 over near the right side of the screen that looked like it flew straight up? Not saying it was anything funny, just wondering what it was.
That was the jettisoned Hotstqge probably, which accelerated way slower than super heavy due to less air resistance, which is why SH is flying past it
I was looking for this comment. Thought I was the only one to see that. It doesn't look like it's floating up to me it looks to be stationary 🤷🏾♂️
@@demetriusbarnes5001 It was falling at a slower rate than the booster at the time, like @vinceheins said. Pretty cool we got to see it in that shot.
My OCD really hates that one engine out...just saying
Engineers too don't worry lol
Apollo 13 lost one on ascent, second stage I believe and they only had 5 engines.
@@Spaceflightlover2010 yes we've all seen the movie
Yeah pure American ingenuity
Apparently Elon is getting this done without legions of B-1s. The DOJ is suing him for hiring Americans! Meanwhile (you did not see this on the "news") Zuckerbucks had a 25-year-old Chinese B-1 boy suicide out the window at Facebook HQ. The lone engineer who stepped up to protest working conditions/issues got fired immediately. Web search with different engines and see who says what about this.
by a South African
Yeah.pure american pollution.
@@deejay-su7ufit’s uses methane, and liquid oxygen, it doesn’t use conventional fuel, and crude oils. Also, it is recovered after landing, creating low amount of trash.
I love this
Самая мощная гиперзвуковая ракета в мире
flat earthers in shambles right now
k
No they will always find a way to ignore facts.
Where are the stars?why was it hard to point a camera to space?
@@b_itachigaming2563 9:00 You seriously don't see stars ???
@@mikes7446 there’s no curve ? 😂 only the the end of the world 😂
you know you've got a big rocket when the microphones give up
Wow, time to get rid of Bad NASA. Space X will get us to Mars.
I'm just here for the copium from Elon and SpaceX haters.
get a hobby
@@soggy_burrito It's as good a hobby as any...
We need more people like Elon.
Fijaros en las ondas de sonido que salen del cohete y se dirigen en los 360 grados en todas direcciones, miren las que van al mar se ven perfectamente. Incluso la potencia de los motores interfieren en el sonido durante los primeros segundos de vuelo. Saludos desde España.
I want to go to Mars. Don’t care if I come back I just want to go there
What we're really witnessing aliens extract precious resources from Earth right before our eyes, under the guise of mankind "exploring new frontiers"...
Engines look like LED lights.
The Raptor 2 engine is crazy powerful. The Raptor 3 even more so and it is almost ready for them to use on the future prototype tests.
It's because they are. This is all fake and CGI.
@@alasdairhicks6731 I make cgi for a living... this isn't cgi.
@@alasdairhicks6731 You can't fake this. You can come close, as seen with productions like First Man, or the "OFT" animation from a bunch of artists here on TH-cam, but it won't be 100%. I'm sorry your view of the world is so sad, I hope you can one day realize the beauty of the real world, and understand that this did in fact happen
@@alasdairhicks6731 I suggest you book a flight to Brownsville TX and head down to Boca Chica to watch the next test flight.
Nice. Thanks for polluting the space around earth more🎉
the future of humanity in front of our eyes. AMAZING.
we can see clearly the earth is rotating so fast .. awesome .. good job SpaceX
Godspeed! Why not!? 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
But Elon doesn’t know what he’s doing and doesn’t know anything about engineering, the news told me so 🤣
I was watching CBS on the day of the launch and they never even mentioned the launch.
They were waiting for the cgi to dry.
The media rarely cares about rocket launches until after they happen
@@richspillman4191naw, takes some time to make a news report, ever did a writing project in school? Takes about a day
@@localbean1441 Computers changed all that, I have lightning fast thinking, I would have had it done and out by last print, "The rocket deception wooed the masses, balloons fly, space is hard, it's so fake they think it's real."
Bibal about flat earth concept.
And those who believe in that
are disappeared
What's with the engine that didn't work?
Hard to say. Most likely though it's plumbing related issues, the first one that went out shortly after liftoff I don't think would be ice related but more likely pressure or something after startup was not right so it shut down for safety. The outer ring of engines cannot restart as they require ground systems to get them started, it saves a little weight.
The second engine that failed on landing burn could be clogging of a filter from ice again, or gas bubbles from tank slosh, or something else. I'm not sure if this one did a safety shut down or if it blew up and was part of the debris that came out the bottom on landing burn.
In addition to what the person above me said, lighting engines is really hard - specifically one as complex as Raptor is. Historically Raptor has had teething issues as well, given it’s a new, extremely powerful and complex engine
Reading these comments makes me feel hopeful for the future. God bless!
Melted like a birthday candle but kept flying. That's somethin.
It's fake and filmed in a studio or 100% cgi. There is no way they filmed that last scene from Texas with the ship 3200 miles away, why lie about any of it, then the whole thing is a lie. Did you notice the ship stopped moving when the two halves separated? Do not be deceived.
@@richspillman4191 your brain is not functioning properly. You should have it checked.
@@richspillman4191 it kept good connection, via starlink. Traditionally viewing of reentry was impossible, as it couldn’t be transmitted though the plasma during reentry, so instead they used starlink and basically transmitted it up, were plasma was not at. Then it was transmitted back to Texas, thus skipping the plasma. Also throughout most the stream, you can see it moving, just at that height it seems slower, imagine being on a plane, it seems slower than it really is. If you payed a bit more attention at the stream, and maybe school you would’ve understood. Almost forgot to say, that is not what CGI looks like. CGI, looks a lot more plasticity, and more smoother, also the lightning is not realistic. Maybe learn about CGI before you say something is CGI?
@@localbean1441 That flapping fin was the fakest part of the whole thing, Ole wobbly doing the death throes was just silly, especially how they made it so dramatic, "awe look, he's hurt" the body didn't spin, it didn't canter, oh it just tried and tried. Remember in the '60's and '70's if a bolt or rivet came loose at half that speed it was disaster...That fin appendage was flopping and it had NO effect on the structure, I CALL BS. There should have been the agony of defeet, stinky feet.
@@richspillman4191 it wasn’t flopping, it started pitching as it was going into the belly flip for the landing burn, also the hinge kept it together, no screws or nuts came off, sure it did burn though part of the materiel and also blew off some heat tiles, but that wasn’t a catastrophic failure. The reason why accidents with rockets happened before was failure of a major component, example, major loss of heat tiles, fuel lines coming undone, engine implosion. So this is entirely possible, as it’s logical that it could survive, and it did survive. Also please explain in your own words, what you think would happen, you expert on facts and evidence, who is going to break though the matrix
Idk about anyone else but I felt the blast through my phone that was absolutely massive 😍
Man this is so inspiring and impressive
Congratulations to the SpaceX team. This rocket is the stuff of legends.
CHECK-MATE FLAT EARTHERS 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
This always looks better than any Hollywood movie. Every single time.
Baby TeSla kingDom love 💚🙏💚
💚💚💚💚💚💚 Hello 💚💚💚💚💚
man that opening launch sequence where a drone camera is looking down at the Starship is magnifique
so it went into the water? or did it land ?
My friend lives in north Houston and she could hear the sounds this thing made at 8 am
That's not possible. This is near Brownsville, TX in Boca Chica.
Probably heard a standard commercial airplane overhead, Houston is too far for the rocket's sound waves to travel
That was a spectacular launch and splashdown! I can't wait to see when the superheavy booster makes landfall.
The crowd sounds more like being at a concert than a test launch. Love their enthusiasm and excitement.
The term is "rubes".
@@ThulgoreAnd who are you exactly?
Musk will save humanity, or at least he tries.🎉
Fantastic Animation
I'm in your walls.
Look in your walls...
when in the hell are we making space ships, this is very inefficient.
Outstanding!
so the booster rocket failed and fell over on landing?
I dont think a majority of people understand what is happening here. We basically just sent a future reusable skyscraper to Space!! That is so cool! And it happened on my birthday a past dark day because of D-Day Normandy happening that day in 1944. This is a milestone that will ADVANCE our civilization as long as we can focus on helping each other and work together instead of against!
Are Those sparkles thats in the backround means there are aliens watching the space craft launch??
… ancient astronaut theorist say yes 🤣
Is this the one with the 33 jets on it?
Rockets*
@@JamesMathison98 don't waste your time educating them
@@JamesMathison98 Thanks.
@@JamesMathison98 33 Raptor two engines on the booster and 3 vacuum and 3 atmospheric raptor two engines
@@GordonTurnerr she seems nice
What a lifetime to be alive. Incredible!
So...the Earth isn't flat???
correct. we've known this since centuries ago
@@graywilde5498Millenia ago.
Mildly impressive but you Earthlings have got much to learn before you can join
us in Alfa Centauri Solar system.
WOOT WOOT I stayed up all night watching this amazingly beautiful
something awesome coming this way
Ieškau darbo tarp Europos kosmoso agentūros noriu tapti palydovų ir raketų inžinierium asteroidų ir ugnikalnių geologu chemiku fiziku astrofiziku astronomu ir astronautu ieškosiu meteoritų
Fishes in Gulf of Mexico must be scared to death today.
They would well cooked or boiled.
CBS is the only outlet calling this Starship launch a success. Others called " Launch without explosion". Hope CBS stay in middle more
I was in south Padre when it launched without knowing. Talking about scared to death.
That was so cringe and fake. the footage is getting a little better but you still have to work at it. Oh and uh, lose the pretentious cheering cause it's a giveaway.
Why is it fake?
The Moon and Mars is one step closer! It was a magnificent test flight, looking forward to launch #5
Too bad they gotta find out next how to protect humans from the radiation ☢️
@TrapBoiFuse561 they already know. Bury the habitation areas. The moon regolith and Martian soil will shield from the radiation until terraforming can he completed in the case of Mars.
@@jasongoodman3384 thru space after leaving the ozone layer nobody ever survives after leaving it so they gotta solve that problem in a 100 years
@@TrapBoiFuse561you can literally put a water tank on the side of starship that would be facing the sun on the flight and it would block basically any radiation
@@vice214 before you pass away on earth u will never seee a real moon landing can’t fake it in 2024 radiation ☢️ is the real reason we can’t leave earth 🌎
All 13!!
Man you do a lot of cool stuff in the world sir Love you buddy hope to see you someday ❤❤❤
7:30
How is it possible that someone with an alien number who arrived in this country like Elon does this and NASA and Boeing are in the process of launching space launches?😂😂❤❤
Bro it’s hilarious 😂
Well to be honest I think the military industrial complex is the real space program of our government, and think they have even more money than Spacex.
Because those companies have prioritized profits before people.
Because those companies are under government check while space X is ran on its own budget
This is the same company that is having land vehicles recalled right?
No that's tesla, tesla recalls are mostly software updates people get over night vs ford and GM which get recalls every couple of months over fire and powertrain failures. SpaceX does work with teslsa, what they have In common is producing the safest cars and rockets in the world, NHTSA rates tesla as top in safety, and falcon 9 has the safest launch record in history and beat Boeing in developing a crew capsul for sending astronoughts to the ISS.
Amazing achievement by Elon and SpaceX. Wondering if we will see a Mars test landing soon. Can they send autonomous robotics to 3D print a landing pad on an unmanned mission?
"We got a booster on the way back to the gulf and a ship on the way to space"... There are some cool things about this timeline.... Jetpacks... Now can we get cheap flying "cars" ?
SpaceX has succesfully launched Starship multiple times. This time it succesfully landed it aswell.
Топливо хорошо идёт, по-моему. Можно лучше, если уменьшить диаметр "там".
I can't believe we are actually on the cusp of REAL interplanetary human travel! The iterative manufacturing SpaceX is using is genius! Let's Gooooooooo!!!!!
It melted down, but landed somehow.
Mildly impressive but you Earthlings have got much to learn before you can join
us in Alfa Centauri Solar system.
SpaceX should work on inclusivity in their company. We want black people reservations in SpaceX👄♥️♥️👍
What was the object in the video frame observed at a distance during the booster decent?
It was large and on the right side of the frame. The altitude of the booster stage was 40 km, 6:50 into the video.
6.50, I also have just been wondering what that was too. Anyone have any updates, can't see this being reported anywhere else. The video is amazing and the opening drone shot fantastic.
The hot staging ring
@@weekiely1233thought it were small pieces of ice
@@localbean1441 nope. It’s a giant metal disk
Most of the spec you see are ice though
Take that Boeing 😂
Successfully launches and lands*
Successfully launches and simulates* landings.
@@ModeratelyAmused a water landing is still a landing!
@@fossteraYes, but it was Simulating the landing proceedure for the Tower.
Elon, propel humanity forward into the future, even if it means dragging us kicking and screaming! LET'S GOooooo...!
Could you imagine NASA trying this. It would take another 100 years.
Jackson Thomas Thomas Steven Rodriguez Helen
Amazing thanks
one rocket did not ignite?
wow it mostly made it good progress
mostly? it made 2 splashdowns.
@@nieznanyx 99.7% made it to splash down, still impressive and making progress
@@rev1hard you got proof that its 99.7% exactly?
@@nieznanyx 99.7 is an estimate of course, possibly 2 blown engines (impressive it can take it with out losing the craft btw).
A possible deployment of something when the cameras cut out, in addition the heat shield being jestisoned. Plus when you look at the damage the fins, (winglets? winlets? Finlets?) took from burn through from plasma getting past the heat shield.
Its obviously not a 100% return of the craft. not a bad job, just not 100%
The goal of this flight was to simulate landing with Super Heavy (100%) and successfully survive re-entry with Starship, which it 100% did.
The model of Starship launched is already obsolete, with an older, vulnerable fin design. Along with the fins, SpaceX left off 2 tiles and replaced a tile with an incorrect thickness. They wanted to see how well Starship would react when damaged during re-entry. I assume they were shocked when Starship was still able to belly flop with all that damage to the 4 fins.
Imagine a private company doing it better than a Govt funded NASA.. who had to rent a ride from Russians to get to space....
so did one of the engines fail? but it still works fine?
what flew by at 6:50 ???
На высоте, по-моему, необходим быстрее поток выхлопа.
This is probably one of the biggest milestones in human history.
And sadly so many people either haven’t heard about it or don’t care enough to look into it…
Love seeing when humans get our minds together for common progress. One of our better collective moments for while in world often plagued with black. Good work space x team. Cheers.
So they want to go to Mars, but we can’t even get to the moon. It doesn’t seem plausible.
Starship will be more than capable of going to the moon once it’s fully operational.
6:49 WTF was that MATE!!! 4 seconds
Space trash. There's a lot of it
It's like watching Kerbal Space Program become reality.
This just never gets old.