You're comment made me laugh. Unfortunately, I can't keep of my mind thinking when I look those kind of video that if there was an airbag on my mum's car, she would be always alive.
@@AIexanderHartdegen sorry to hear that 😔 of course, in no way I want to reduce the respect for the great work they do on airbags and car security. It’s amazing what’s possible with today’s technology and it saves many peoples lifes every day ✌🏻
@@michaelknight141 yes... Airbags save many lifes. I made many years ago a thesis on how accelerometers work. And it's a very sharp technology. Only for rich people when it came out... But hopefully for everybody now.
Volvo developed the three-point seatbelt in the 50s. In order to increase the safety of all vehicle occupants, they decided not to apply for a patent. Good guy Volvo ❤️
They patented it but share with the industry without royalty. They also pioneered the systematic crash test similar to what NHTSA and IIHS are doing today.
As you could see, the Volvo slid off the barrier and kept going. This is Volvo's literal best small overlap feature. To minimize impact, it's designed to slide off. They also invented the three way seatbelt. Most car manufacturers would patent this. But Volvo was kind enough to actually share this feature to other car manufacturers to improve cabin safety. This is why Volvo is always ahead. But the grill ejection feature on small overlaps on BMW's help retain the value of the grill, so you can sell it and afford the repairs of the small overlap damage. See the grill ejection feature in action at 0:33. (The grill ejection feature isn't real, but it's funny how the x5 reacted to the small overlap by letting go of the front grill).
The momentum transfer of that volvo was insane, like a F1 car designed to break in big pieces absorbing most of the impact! The way impact decelerated was bonkers. Fine engineering indeed!
Yeah the capture at the end showed it, the BMW with its tires off the ground because more energy transferred to the whole structure of the car, whereas the Volvo's crushed better and parts came off, absorbing enough of the energy of the crash that the wheels never really left the ground like the BMW did. I'd probably trust the Volvo more in a roll over risk incident, but the BMW is of a higher general quality and driving experience, and tbh between these two, I might take the BMW. I'll make that decision when I hear the Bang and Olufsen sound system in the Volvo, I work on them but haven't listened to that one yet, only the Harmon Kardon which left much to be desired. I liked the premium system in the 2019 Nissan Maxima more than the HK Volvo system lol.
@@johnnymatias3027 consider some of the worse engines in production are BMW, some are fantastic, but most are horrific, and customer service is something to be desired, please research, not everyone is in a great financial situation, dont get stuck with a dog 👍🏻👍🏻
You will notice that in the front small overlap crash tests where Volvos are crashed, the front wheel is sheered off, as was also the case in this test. The front wheel of the BMW was crushed back into the rear of the engine compartment and possibly into the footwell area - but not the case with the Volvo, which is something to think about.
@@mikimus3583 I'd say the opposite. The bmw was almost stationary wrt direction of impact but rebounded perpendicularly, cvf the volvo which glanced off the barrier and was still moving forward quite quickly after the impact - i.e. forces much much higher in the BMW. BMW performed well but Volvo was better as might be expected.
Meh. If that were the case, the BMW wouldn’t have scored perfect. Yes, some cars will push the wheel into the compartment. Not in this case. Both are very safe, and I would even say the BMW is better for whiplash injuries according to the video.
The Volvo crush and energy deflection built into its body and frame design is definitely Superior in this. More energy was transferred into the BMW passenger area by the car coming to a quicker stop. The Volvo crushed in a way that deflected the energy off to the side more instead of into the cab area. That is one of the Volvo kept rolling further which means the people within its cabin received less energy and would theoretically receive less forced trauma injuries. Small differences in design make a huge difference in the life of the person or his family that is in that car. Hats off to these engineers! 👍🏻
@@RandomHondaGuy haha no, x5 and xc90 are fullsize in Europe, and competitors. For American and particularly Asian (Chinese) market BMW has developed the x7, volvo didnt do that yet. The x7 is clearly a step above rhe x5 and xc90 in every way. You can get a x7 here, but you rarely see one.
@@gihansandeepa3961 a couple of years ago, they were busted by Australian authorities for using asbestos based engine gaskets. They had to withdraw from the Australian market and coming back strongly under a different skin called Volvo
They do all this carefully calculated testing and then rate with the vague terms bad, good, very good etc? Even a 10 point scale sounds too basic. I'd expect them to rate on a scale of 0 to 100.
That is actually good, because the person inside the car would feel less force in an accident. As for the BMW it didn't deflect the accident so the dummy would see more force. So the volvo would suck less.
@@sallalooz you don't have any idea what are you talking about! The car must remain as close as possible to the initial impact so it won't affect other car in traffic!
@@MrRadulaur haha...It seems like i don't know what i am talking about. Do you mind sharing more about your thesis. It would be amazing to see a crash simulation comparing both or maybe something you can share. Seems like you have deep insight. Educate me please
Another good safety feature of Volvo's is that, if they hit someone they are designed so the person is more likely to go up onto the bonnet and survive, rather than beneath the vehicle. There is a crash test video of this happening...at a press event I think, albeit accidently, the collision sensors (which I think were designed in this vehicle to pick out vehicles not pedestrians) didn't pick up the person who was standing directly in front of the moving car (which I think was an XC90) with tripod and camera and got hit by the car.
@@TheIceMurder2 I agree, it is clickbait. I said odd because why put the correct number in the description if you're going to lie in the title anyway 😂
The Volvo, clearly. It deviates the energy of the impact much better. You can see on the airbag that the print of the dummy 's face is way lighter. The BMW absorbs all the energy of the impact, meaning that a bigger part of it goes to the driver.
It's quite clear how much better the Volvo fairs in protection it's passengers by deflecting the impact, yet they basically get the same rating. I think maybe the system needs a little tweak.
0:22 if anything, this convinced me that Volvo holds the name for safety. The tire isn't needed for the passenger's survival, and the XC90, not just mangled, discarded it. The way you throw away a pinecone on a hike, zero regard, that vehicle couldn't change path without inconveniencing the passenger and it didn't.
I think it's worth noting that the Volvo, like you mentioned, absorbed the energy really well and pushed itself off the obstacle, whereas the BMW lifted up off its back wheels on impact. The better looking option isn't always the greatest.
Jesus there's 5 people in this thread jumping over themselves with back seat theorems and "things that I've heard about crash testing and safety". I just imagine how fucking ridiculous y'all would look like if there'd be an actual learned researcher of crash test scenarios present while you try to look smart in a comment section.
@Thor Odin son Nascar? Rally? Drift cars? Got plastic/standart/carbon body and steel rig frame to keep driver alive. F1 have special capsule for protection. So, you are wrong.
I like how Volvo just says screw the tire, go straight. It reduces the impact on the driver, there's not much force being applied to him. I don't know if it's intended but it's a pretty smart idea if it is
dont forget that volvo's seatbelts tighten on impending crashes and it pulls the chair down in an angle like bucket seats in race cars, and the headrest follows you. at least on the 2016+ volvo xc90. i dont know about the older models or bmw's. the crush zone took all the impact rather quickly which propelled the car to the right or straightforward but kept going. i wonder if the brake system was engaged, why it kept rolling? not sure if brakes are a factor or not included in the overall of things, bc again the volvo will have auto braking at less than 30mph or if the computer calculates an oncoming crash. it happened to me, a car was behind me and started to get really close on the highway where i was going 70mph. the xc90 automatically tighten my seatbelt, brought down my seat, and it lightly started to brake. the car behind me backed off and kept a distance. i know that volvo's in europe tailights will blink if the car behind it is too close, but i wonder if it does something similar to US consumers of xc90's??
@@reaperreaper9593 yes this i know. With the 360 cameras, it tightens when it calculates an impact will occur. Way before. Often no accident happens. It's a good signal to be more vigilant of what's around you or to prepare yourself mentally. Lol.
@@reaperreaper9593 Its different in a volvo. Trust me. When I got the xc90 a couple of times the seatbelt pulled me into my seat like no other seatbelt ever has. Way different than any other car I had before that. Its definitely not the same.
I keep buying Volvos and this is why. Years ago I walked away from a crash with only a few cuts and bruises instead of major injuries in a 1993 Volvo 240 wagon. I've never bought anything but Volvo since.
@@miguelvalentine3954 Engineers have learned long ago that vehicle crumple and breakaway zones act to absorb and deflect energy reducing injury. Formula 1 racing has seen injury and death reduction due to these principles. The more ubrupt "stop" of the BMW is contrary to this, whereas the Volvo is far superior. Look it up.
विकल्प बहुत मिलेंगे, मार्ग भटकाने के लिए। संकल्प एक ही रखना, मंजिल तक जाने के लिए। मंजील चाहे जितनी भी ऊँची हो परंतु रास्ते हमेशा अपने पैरो के निचे ही होते है। खुद के ऊपर विश्वास रखो साहेब फिर देखना एक दिन ऐसा आएगा घड़ी दूसरे की होगी और समय आपका.. जिंदगी एक बार मिलती है बिल्कुल गलत है, सिर्फ मौत एक बार मिलती है जिंदगी हर रोज मिलती है।🤗🤗
I feel as though these tests would be better with actual humans, I have a few co-workers I would like to volunteer. Please contact me for their information.
As laypersons, most of us would look at a crash like this in real life and think, "wow that expensive car got completely totalled" while in reality that crumpling and breaking away probably helped save the driver's life. Cars that are built more stiff may look better after a crash but harm the driver.
По превью я подумал, неужели вольво хуже?! А оказывается, что инженеры вольво такие крутые, сделать так, чтобы тачка с минимальным замедлением поехала дальше после такого удара, фантастика. Когда бэха просто останавливается и её пассажиры испытывают бОльшие нагрузки.
@@СергейЛеонов-ц9ш а куда будет двигаться? Здесь две стороны медали. Она может продолжить движение в любой далее находящийся объект, машина/дерево/отбойник/стена, что угодно.
Yes (even though lateral forces are probably higher), but it could also divert the vehicle into other hazards. I'm actually really curious which method ultimately produces better real-world outcomes.
@@james64ibm In real world, the Volvo would apply full auto brake before crash. And if that was not detectable, the Volvo would apply full brake as soon as it senses the crash. In real world, nothing beats Volvo. NO ONE has been killed in an XC90 in the UK since it was released there in 2004. Yes, NO ONE - ZERO, 0!
@@Xanthopteryx right, and not also in UK. Here in Italy as well (proudly owner of an XC90 D5 AWD and a old school Land Rover Defender and a Alfa Romeo Duetto vintage). Volvos are very reliable and safe, and for us tall people are just perfect.
Seriously, the 2003 Volvo XC90 passed the small overlap crash test, if you look at iihs they use the 2003 version crash test through 2015. Let's see a 2003 BMW X5 in a small overlap, XC90 is a beast, of course the new X5 is very safe as well
There is one very important thing here, as why I would chose and have chosen Volvo, that is the G Force felt inside the car. That is what will keep your internal organs in one piece. Volvo has managed to get lower G Force at impact. Best example is in this clip. See how the Volvo just lets all parts fly and it just moves away almost forward. The BMW is still great and safe, but the G Force is stronger, as it almost gets to a stand still before rolls away.
That here the volvo slipped off an obstacle is an accident, not a deliberate act. Making an advantage out of this is pure absurdity. I would never choose a Volvo because of the hopeless 2.0 engine in such a big SUV
I’m old enough to remember when U.S. car manufacturers howled about having to install $25 lap belts in cars. Lap belts that many refused to wear. Those were the days of cars that rotted out in 5-years and roadside breakdowns were common. Car safety and reliability have come a long way since the 1960s. I bought my last American car -actually assembled with Mexican parts- in 1986.
I take it that you didn’t notice how the driver and driver side passenger doors both folded up? The BMW seemed like the driver would be able to up his own door. Also notice the neck panels in the BMW compared to the Volvo. Not good. I also grew up learning that Volvos were almost a guarantee against casualties but that has certainly changed.
Volvo (and SAAB) has always been the forefront of car safety. But this video shows that other manufacturers now have caught up with them. It at least BMW has. Both of these cars perform excellent. But I agree, the BMW seem to crumble less in the driver side. On the other hand the Volvo seeminly smooths/dampens the impact much more. And technically, the Volvo got a lower overall score sure to their child seat lock mechanism
It's funny that the fact that Volvo accidentally slipped, fanboys of the brand try to turn into a great advantage. In tests of other Volvos such a thing does not occur. But the fact that their beloved brand even in a large SUV installs two 2.0 R4 engines does not bother them at all.
Easy to see which is better. Look at the deceleration rate. The volvo barely strafes rightwards and decelerates much less than the BMW, which means less stress on the occupants which means it’s probably safer.
????they both crash at the same spot and exact speed so the impact effect is the same on both drivers . If it keeps going it might hit another car wich is unsafe on the road ( real case scenario) and can cause another accident.... In the other hand bmw stopped in its place. Volvo clearly lost in this crash test
yTZ_FuLL Man I would chose the car that decelerates less a 100 times over the car that absorbs all the shock and stays at the impact spot. It’s basic physics. It’s rate of deceleration that kills you. Of course the car that continues it’s course could in fact hit something else on the way. But it’s a byproduct of making the car safer, there’s no other way.
Doesn't matter that the volvo looked more damaged, that's the point. Make the bodywork sacrificial to absorb the shock. The deceleration between the BMW and Volvo was evident, slower the deceleration the less chance of serious injury. Volvo safer but I'd still rather have BMW.
I was looking at a BMV, but Volvo won out. I will still get a BMV at some point. And Volvo's safety was nearly tested a coupled of Fridays ago when I was came withing in an inch of being rear ended at full highway speed. Thank God that the XC60 has a lot of horsepower. I was able to go from a stop to the median shoulder in a split second to avoid the two vehicles that were coming right at me.
Honestly, saying "BMV" in English is closer to the correct pronunciation (bae emm vay) than spelling "BMW" in English (bee emm double you). So I suppose asking some German for a "BMV" car show would probably have higher chances of success than asking for "BMW", because those that don't know English will - in their head - likely translate "BMV" to "BMW", and those that know may do it as well in spite of theoretically knowing better. Some might notice but assume you meant "BMW" without asking, and only a really really really small fraction will know AND notice AND ask to clarify.
Exactly. And on the volvo the head snapped back wich is VERY Bad for your Spine. So in a real world Scenario the Person in the Bmw would have less Injurys than the one in the Volvo.
X5 wins for me, xc90 deformation of door at end shows about 150mm overlap with rear door = crash cell compromised. Still both are feats of amazing engineering.
@@topfollower6964 yes I am not a toxic fanboy like you . I understand industry in a different manner. And I admit that volvos are far ahead of tesla in all aspects
@@johndododoe1411 you clearly missed my point. There is given ammount of kinetic energy car has when going with certain velocity. Bending parts of car as you said consumes this energy. Volvo clearly slipped on obstacle smoother. What it means is that it lost less speed so it created less kinetic energy so impact was less damaging for passengers
Wow, respect for the engineers. Great job. Passed all tests, even with different cars.
Very good wall.
xD
Got me in the first half
You're comment made me laugh. Unfortunately, I can't keep of my mind thinking when I look those kind of video that if there was an airbag on my mum's car, she would be always alive.
Wow, respect to the tests. Great job. Passed by all different cars!
@@AIexanderHartdegen sorry to hear that 😔
of course, in no way I want to reduce the respect for the great work they do on airbags and car security. It’s amazing what’s possible with today’s technology and it saves many peoples lifes every day ✌🏻
@@michaelknight141 yes... Airbags save many lifes. I made many years ago a thesis on how accelerometers work. And it's a very sharp technology. Only for rich people when it came out... But hopefully for everybody now.
The BMW front grill flies beautifully...
Verdade
haha poli
🤣🤣🤣
@@amcarthur1716 oo
It's so out of place it doesn't even peetend to belong to the car
Volvo developed the three-point seatbelt in the 50s. In order to increase the safety of all vehicle occupants, they decided not to apply for a patent. Good guy Volvo ❤️
They patented it but share with the industry without royalty. They also pioneered the systematic crash test similar to what NHTSA and IIHS are doing today.
Volvo is a pretty cool guy, eh saves lives and doesn't afraid of anything!
After that everyone in car industry agreed to share all patents and knowledge about safety for free, because safety is more important than money.
I love Volvo! Best in the world! Will never drive any other kind.
Patent craze only started after Apple company founded
As you could see, the Volvo slid off the barrier and kept going. This is Volvo's literal best small overlap feature. To minimize impact, it's designed to slide off. They also invented the three way seatbelt. Most car manufacturers would patent this. But Volvo was kind enough to actually share this feature to other car manufacturers to improve cabin safety. This is why Volvo is always ahead. But the grill ejection feature on small overlaps on BMW's help retain the value of the grill, so you can sell it and afford the repairs of the small overlap damage. See the grill ejection feature in action at 0:33. (The grill ejection feature isn't real, but it's funny how the x5 reacted to the small overlap by letting go of the front grill).
I'm pretty sure Volvo patented the three-point belt.
@@Chris371M They didn't.
It should be illegal to patent anything that is in strong public interests.
thanks.. can you please paste the time stamp where the sliding happened
BMW should patent that grille ejection feature!
0:33 that grill is still good to sell tho
legend says it still flies around the world
😂😂😂😂
It will still cost more than my entire car. 😂
„Only used once“
HAHAHAHA LEGEND
The airbags make it look like you wouldn’t even get whiplash. Awesome. I’m going to go crash my car as soon as possible.
Lol 😂
lol
@warren B , are you still alive ?
th-cam.com/video/o1D2q_YAxwQ/w-d-xo.html
This deserve moree .
hahahahahahahaha
The momentum transfer of that volvo was insane, like a F1 car designed to break in big pieces absorbing most of the impact! The way impact decelerated was bonkers. Fine engineering indeed!
Yeah the capture at the end showed it, the BMW with its tires off the ground because more energy transferred to the whole structure of the car, whereas the Volvo's crushed better and parts came off, absorbing enough of the energy of the crash that the wheels never really left the ground like the BMW did. I'd probably trust the Volvo more in a roll over risk incident, but the BMW is of a higher general quality and driving experience, and tbh between these two, I might take the BMW. I'll make that decision when I hear the Bang and Olufsen sound system in the Volvo, I work on them but haven't listened to that one yet, only the Harmon Kardon which left much to be desired. I liked the premium system in the 2019 Nissan Maxima more than the HK Volvo system lol.
@@johnnymatias3027 Volvos are pretty underrated as luxury vehicles
@@johnnymatias3027 consider some of the worse engines in production are BMW, some are fantastic, but most are horrific, and customer service is something to be desired, please research, not everyone is in a great financial situation, dont get stuck with a dog 👍🏻👍🏻
I know JACK SQUAT about engineering, yet I could tell I’d rather be in the Volvo for this test: well, me not being a total dummy…🤷🏾♂️
@@suprajew60 just ignore the N47 from 2008-2010 engines and you are gonna be fine
You will notice that in the front small overlap crash tests where Volvos are crashed, the front wheel is sheered off, as was also the case in this test. The front wheel of the BMW was crushed back into the rear of the engine compartment and possibly into the footwell area - but not the case with the Volvo, which is something to think about.
At least with the BMW, you'll know where to find your front wheel and not have to go looking for it like with the Volvo! lol
Ye and the BMW kinda just flew away and the volvo was still on the ground
Is finding your wheel really your first priority after a crash like that lol.. @@bobjohnson205
@@mikimus3583 I'd say the opposite. The bmw was almost stationary wrt direction of impact but rebounded perpendicularly, cvf the volvo which glanced off the barrier and was still moving forward quite quickly after the impact - i.e. forces much much higher in the BMW. BMW performed well but Volvo was better as might be expected.
Meh. If that were the case, the BMW wouldn’t have scored perfect. Yes, some cars will push the wheel into the compartment. Not in this case. Both are very safe, and I would even say the BMW is better for whiplash injuries according to the video.
The Volvo crush and energy deflection built into its body and frame design is definitely Superior in this. More energy was transferred into the BMW passenger area by the car coming to a quicker stop. The Volvo crushed in a way that deflected the energy off to the side more instead of into the cab area. That is one of the Volvo kept rolling further which means the people within its cabin received less energy and would theoretically receive less forced trauma injuries. Small differences in design make a huge difference in the life of the person or his family that is in that car. Hats off to these engineers! 👍🏻
Looking at the data the acceleration values are BMW 94 G left, 38 G right foot. Volvo: 27/16 G, so yea, quite the difference in this test.
But what about rolling into other traffic After the crash? Is there no brake System ?
*Is Scoggin a Nordic name?*
@@MrScreamCream Let me tell you what would happen if any other cars hit the Volvo. They fold up like accordions.
I love my old Volvo.
@@MrScreamCream they do have post collision braking system
x5 and xc90 being classed „mid sized“ may just be the most american thing I‘ve seen in a long time lol
Tbf they are. If compared to the x7
@@RandomHondaGuy xc90 is massive tho
@@user-ky6zl7qc7m X5 is like Xc60, x7 like xc90
@@RandomHondaGuy haha no, x5 and xc90 are fullsize in Europe, and competitors. For American and particularly Asian (Chinese) market BMW has developed the x7, volvo didnt do that yet. The x7 is clearly a step above rhe x5 and xc90 in every way. You can get a x7 here, but you rarely see one.
@@dzengerink what ever you say
0:34 I just saw that grill passing by my house yesterday heading east.
Lol that was good 🤣😂🤣
Haha
That was a good one .😂😂
Ha ha
I salvaged it, have hotdogs, hamburgs & steak on it cooking as we speak ...
That bmw grill got eject mode.. Can be used in any new bmw
it's so you can swap it out for a performance grill.
My BMW X5's Grill, goes into Eject Mode every time I stop at a Red Light.
So does the Volvo hood.
and gladly that thing is so ugly 😂😂
lol that thing just kept driving on.
Dont scroll further, the whole comment section is about the grill
Sorry man but that grill got stuck and took my scroll button with it.
Thanks for the heads-up mate..✌🏻
Just came back to say, you were right
@@ShaggszzDvr told ya =)
@Johnson Long i see you are a man of culture as well
I loved the grill’s ejection system.
Agree but it sad that you need to have a catastrophic collision to get rid of that abomination.
Guaranteed to fly off without a scratch upon impact or your money back 🤣🤣🤣
th-cam.com/video/o1D2q_YAxwQ/w-d-xo.html
This deserve moree .
What is the Indestructible wall they used? Vibranium?
The grill said "aight, imma head out"
I liked the way that Volvo left half of the car and drove further. Like Ikea, even without missing some elements you can still build your furniture.
Volvo=Geely
@@AdolfHitler-si3ze geely is shit
@@gihansandeepa3961 a couple of years ago, they were busted by Australian authorities for using asbestos based engine gaskets. They had to withdraw from the Australian market and coming back strongly under a different skin called Volvo
More whiplash on the Volvo plus the drive further could've hit another car resulting in more bodily injury or fall off a cliff
@@AdolfHitler-si3ze So is fucking BMW for morron
0:51 loved how the front grill of bmw is like " bye have a great time" and flew away
Legend says the bmw grill is still traveling around the universe
Nah!... Yesterday I saw him in my backyard with his wife and children and grilling bbq 😁🤩 for his family...
Ha ha ha.....😂😂😂...I didn't noticed first!
So that's what i saw in the nightsky yesterday
It just passed the manhole cover
Cheap copy paste from an 2 year old comment.. sad ppl give you likes
Imagine being a pedestrian just dodging an accident just to be sliced like an apple by a BMW grill being launched at you.
Lol
The grill is actually plastic
I bet you’re fun a parties
But it kept going down the road....
@@MrVegchel i bet you don‘t get invited to partys
Fastest tire change I’ve ever seen. The tire was off in under a second.
U so funny dude, with that joke, can be a famous conedian!!
But what did it cost 😂
Lightning mcqueen’s staff does better
You must have missed Mission Impossible 2
They didn't just remove a tire in under a second, they changed it in the blink of an eye !
Also, the alloy, cut in half pieces.
Во время просмотра заболела шея...
Не нужна тебе , Вовка,эта машина👍, ©Кот.
They need to add a "Very Good" evaluation. These results are vastly better than the results found on other "Good" crashes.
Amazing ... Awesome ... Fabulous ... Could be next level beyond "Vastly"
They do all this carefully calculated testing and then rate with the vague terms bad, good, very good etc? Even a 10 point scale sounds too basic. I'd expect them to rate on a scale of 0 to 100.
Tbf you cant really see from the visuals how dangerous the crashs are. Like the forces and distortion on the dummies.
After this crash, Volvo continued its life as a 3-wheeler. It didn't stop 😅
That is actually good, because the person inside the car would feel less force in an accident. As for the BMW it didn't deflect the accident so the dummy would see more force. So the volvo would suck less.
@@sallalooz you don't have any idea what are you talking about! The car must remain as close as possible to the initial impact so it won't affect other car in traffic!
@@MrRadulaur haha...It seems like i don't know what i am talking about. Do you mind sharing more about your thesis. It would be amazing to see a crash simulation comparing both or maybe something you can share. Seems like you have deep insight. Educate me please
@@sallalooz that car will probably flip somewhere down the road
From XC 90 to Reliant Robin in 2 seconds.
0:33
BMW's grill: *catapulted
Factory worker: hmm... that's why I have remaining bolts
It just keeps driving lol. But actually these are just clipped, no bolts used and it is not so eassy to get them off by hand.
HAhahahahahahahahahahahahaha
as a BMW factory worker, we dont use bolts for the grill. ;)
hahaha, your funny, bolts for a grill, thats the funniest shit i have heard in 20 years
@@justarandomguy3969 that was a point of the comment
Another good safety feature of Volvo's is that, if they hit someone they are designed so the person is more likely to go up onto the bonnet and survive, rather than beneath the vehicle. There is a crash test video of this happening...at a press event I think, albeit accidently, the collision sensors (which I think were designed in this vehicle to pick out vehicles not pedestrians) didn't pick up the person who was standing directly in front of the moving car (which I think was an XC90) with tripod and camera and got hit by the car.
The biggest plus of the volvo is the tiny r4 engine in a giant suv is just an advantage 😂😂
0:33
BMW Grill: I Believe I Can Fly
🤣🤣
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋgood
Then the radiator screams and reaches out like "Please don't go!"
BMW is the shit
lets be real, no one searched for this
I sure didn’t. 😂
Been lock down for 2 months now
I guess TH-cam is out of videos for me to watch
@@unclegibus3363 splendid
.....I didn't, the only possible connection is that I have xc60.
Yod
This looks like an easy way to swap out the BMW grill for a m peformance one
Hahahaha you're terrible 🤣
That’s why i don ‘t bye a volvo
Maybe a little too easy 😳
ABRAÇO MEU AMIGO AQUI DO FEIRÃO DE VEÍCULOS GOIÂNIA GO🚘
0:50 - Решетка радиатора у БМВ даже после крушения - опасное оружие.
И?? Кто выиграл??🤔🤔🤔
@@BadBoy-fo2fn не знаю но по крештест 2020года 1.Тесла. 2.Вольво. 3.Ягуар. бмв 7.Или 9 забыл
Еркебулан Мадибек мерс на первом месте
@@ИванДубровский-ж1ф он не может быть на первом месте, посмотри в инете и больше не делай вбросв
@@qton7814 сами немцы пишут, Ауди и БМВ догонят Мерс в 2021 году. Статистика не моя
Its so inspiring with the music especially the part where the BMW grill flew beautifully.
Bruh
Bruh
Volvo's front grill is so loyal, no matter what I ain't leaving you
Azerbaycandansan ?
@@feridsabizade3997 ))) məndə
it has seatbelt.
)))
@@mistermerlinkamelotski1799 yes
There is an error in the title of the video. Volvo XC90 from 2016 !!!, not 2019 as written. Please correct the mistake!
Am I the only one who noticed that it's a 2016 XC90 and not a 2019???
Volvo 2016 vs blw 2019
Clickbait
It says 2016 in the description though. Odd clickbait.
@@nielsvandenkieboom5034 You had to click on the video first before reading the description hence clickbait...
@@TheIceMurder2 I agree, it is clickbait. I said odd because why put the correct number in the description if you're going to lie in the title anyway 😂
Bruh, the Volvo legit said "no u" and drove away from that crash on three wheels. Svedish engineering
No one:
Litterally no one:
TH-cam: Don't you want to know which car is safer? The BMW X5 or the volvo XC90?
Me: SURE
sebas R no difference
I looked this up
The Volvo, clearly. It deviates the energy of the impact much better. You can see on the airbag that the print of the dummy 's face is way lighter. The BMW absorbs all the energy of the impact, meaning that a bigger part of it goes to the driver.
They're both unsave
@@oczhaal 😂😂😂
It's quite clear how much better the Volvo fairs in protection it's passengers by deflecting the impact, yet they basically get the same rating. I think maybe the system needs a little tweak.
Тоже ищешь русский комент?
Ага
Нет
Нет. Перевожу комменты на английском. (Изучаю этот язык)
Странно, что не 40, не 50 процентов перекрытия удар. Т.е.методика априори нарушена. Т.с.показательные выступления, ах ах ах
@@ildarny5828 попробуй порнхаб. Очень увлекательно.
0:22 if anything, this convinced me that Volvo holds the name for safety. The tire isn't needed for the passenger's survival, and the XC90, not just mangled, discarded it. The way you throw away a pinecone on a hike, zero regard, that vehicle couldn't change path without inconveniencing the passenger and it didn't.
@Thor Odin son elaborate, please
@Thor Odin son Isn't that how it is supposed to work? The car is supposed to deform and absorb the energy of the crash keeping the cabin's integrity
I think it's worth noting that the Volvo, like you mentioned, absorbed the energy really well and pushed itself off the obstacle, whereas the BMW lifted up off its back wheels on impact. The better looking option isn't always the greatest.
Jesus there's 5 people in this thread jumping over themselves with back seat theorems and "things that I've heard about crash testing and safety". I just imagine how fucking ridiculous y'all would look like if there'd be an actual learned researcher of crash test scenarios present while you try to look smart in a comment section.
@Thor Odin son
Nascar? Rally? Drift cars? Got plastic/standart/carbon body and steel rig frame to keep driver alive.
F1 have special capsule for protection.
So, you are wrong.
Grill: "My time has come. Change da world"
Volvo is incredible. Seems almost like a smooth impact
The only problem I saw was that the door crumbled and allowed shrapnel to come into the car.
Most impressive thing is actually speed of the airbags...
NaN3
Yes
th-cam.com/video/o1D2q_YAxwQ/w-d-xo.html
This deserve moree ....,,
@@СтасИволга-ъ5ж pusy
Well airbags are deployed by an explosive charge, they have to be fast
I like how Volvo just says screw the tire, go straight. It reduces the impact on the driver, there's not much force being applied to him. I don't know if it's intended but it's a pretty smart idea if it is
It is. Volvo mastered vehicle safety.
There even is dynamite in the axles of newer cars so they blow off the wheel. Otherwise thw front left turns in your footspace which can be fatal.
@@jonnymauser811 I think they first improved this on 960/S/V/90 face lift. Before 740/940 there was a bigger risk for this.
And theres a post crash braking system, to safely bring you to a stop
@@jonnymauser811 bruh what lmao, dynamite? Source for that?
dont forget that volvo's seatbelts tighten on impending crashes and it pulls the chair down in an angle like bucket seats in race cars, and the headrest follows you. at least on the 2016+ volvo xc90. i dont know about the older models or bmw's. the crush zone took all the impact rather quickly which propelled the car to the right or straightforward but kept going. i wonder if the brake system was engaged, why it kept rolling? not sure if brakes are a factor or not included in the overall of things, bc again the volvo will have auto braking at less than 30mph or if the computer calculates an oncoming crash. it happened to me, a car was behind me and started to get really close on the highway where i was going 70mph. the xc90 automatically tighten my seatbelt, brought down my seat, and it lightly started to brake. the car behind me backed off and kept a distance. i know that volvo's in europe tailights will blink if the car behind it is too close, but i wonder if it does something similar to US consumers of xc90's??
Всё что вы описали, есть также и в бма и даже больше.
@@adyg777 I had no idea. Thanks!
All seat belts tighten during an impact. That is why they always have to be replaced after their charges fire.
@@reaperreaper9593 yes this i know. With the 360 cameras, it tightens when it calculates an impact will occur. Way before. Often no accident happens. It's a good signal to be more vigilant of what's around you or to prepare yourself mentally. Lol.
@@reaperreaper9593 Its different in a volvo. Trust me. When I got the xc90 a couple of times the seatbelt pulled me into my seat like no other seatbelt ever has. Way different than any other car I had before that. Its definitely not the same.
I keep buying Volvos and this is why. Years ago I walked away from a crash with only a few cuts and bruises instead of major injuries in a 1993 Volvo 240 wagon. I've never bought anything but Volvo since.
Amazing how well the Volvo disperses the energy, no bounce! Superb job!
So you're ok with the fact that the Volvo didn't actually stop
@@miguelvalentine3954 isnt that a Good thing?
@@Menethorable think the the potential damage it can do b4 it comes to a stop.
@@miguelvalentine3954 Engineers have learned long ago that vehicle crumple and breakaway zones act to absorb and deflect energy reducing injury. Formula 1 racing has seen injury and death reduction due to these principles. The more ubrupt "stop" of the BMW is contrary to this, whereas the Volvo is far superior. Look it up.
And notice how the wheel breaks off instead on going into to foot compartment..
TH-cam suggestion:
Crash test of two of the cars you can't afford?
Me:
Yeah, sure..
You could drive safe one day till than angels be with you!
I was lucky to buy an XC90 this year. I love it. It was between these two cars actually! I hope you get one of them some day.
This makes me glad that there is no solid metal blocks along the roads, those trees though - can still do plenty damage.
No solid metal blocks ?????
You live under a rock ????
Metal and concrete barriers are everywhere !!!
विकल्प बहुत मिलेंगे,
मार्ग भटकाने के लिए।
संकल्प एक ही रखना,
मंजिल तक जाने के लिए।
मंजील चाहे जितनी भी ऊँची हो परंतु रास्ते हमेशा अपने पैरो के निचे ही होते है।
खुद के ऊपर विश्वास रखो साहेब फिर देखना एक दिन ऐसा आएगा घड़ी दूसरे की होगी और समय आपका..
जिंदगी एक बार मिलती है बिल्कुल गलत है, सिर्फ मौत एक बार मिलती है जिंदगी हर रोज मिलती है।🤗🤗
Ótimo pensamento!
0:32 lol the Beamers grill is like 'I must keep going'.
😀😀😀😀😀
РАКАТ ЖОК ендв
😂😂😂😂
I feel as though these tests would be better with actual humans, I have a few co-workers I would like to volunteer.
Please contact me for their information.
Ha ha,u funny mate
Yes yes. Same here. I can suggest a whole dept of people and u can run tests everyday.
My Boss would like to volunteer for this demo
@Sewan & Sawen Creations
Agreed
But there are situations and responsibilities where you can't leave your job and stuck with the vultures
Life is too short not to have fun and take everything too seriously. It was just a joke, I actually like my co-workers.
That bmw grill is ejector grill,
Like in aircraft 00:33
That volvo didnt even slow down..........drove right on through the barrier....what a badass !
the Volvo is just like a Viking, continues pushing even with one arm missing
great comment...🤣🤣🤣
A Chinese Viking?
@@tokoloshgolem - a Chinese Viking would steal all your data
A Chinese Viking would ask you, “Have you eaten yet?”
No body:
BMW front grill: Na fam an object in motion stays in motion until acted upon by an external force!
Got to respect the Physics man
0:33 BMW X5 crashed..
Front Grille : Aight imma head out!
As laypersons, most of us would look at a crash like this in real life and think, "wow that expensive car got completely totalled" while in reality that crumpling and breaking away probably helped save the driver's life.
Cars that are built more stiff may look better after a crash but harm the driver.
2019 BMW vs 2016 VOLVO. Don't lie
Thanks you!
Sabe de nada inocente. Este volvo é um 2019 também
@@endireitabrasil1719 1:33 min. Volvo 2016
Oh Shit, i missed it. Wondering how good 2019 xc90 this day.
are u sure in 2019 their selling a different model? Could be a 2019 model, just hasn’t changed from 2016
The grille didn’t even slow down.
“I got places to be!”
비엠은 충돌시 뒤로 약간 밀리면서 옆으로 빠지는 모습이 있는데 이건 속도가 제어되면서 다중충돌 위험이 있구요, 볼보는 속도가 크게 죽지않고 앞으로 가서 더 안전한 모습입니다. 참고로 잘못만들어진 차들은 저기서 진행방향이 90도로 꺾여서 옆구리가 후방추돌에 노출됩니다.
오 갑자기 한국인
스마트 현우씨?
@@김성일-f5b ㅋㅋ
근데 뜬금 없지만 x5,xc90 디자인 예쁘다...
그래서 어떤 차가 윈인데?
The X5 grill was like : nah I aint wanna crash😂
Why in the video is a 2016 volvo xc90 and in the title it says that is 2019?
This XC90 is since 2015 in production. It Its the same car after all
The Ultimate Driving Machine...even when it stops, the Grill will get you there!
По превью я подумал, неужели вольво хуже?! А оказывается, что инженеры вольво такие крутые, сделать так, чтобы тачка с минимальным замедлением поехала дальше после такого удара, фантастика. Когда бэха просто останавливается и её пассажиры испытывают бОльшие нагрузки.
Не заметил данный факт
@@ravgooglshaman9475 вольво, заехав под фуру, с минимальным замедлением будет двигаться дальше.
@@СергейЛеонов-ц9ш а куда будет двигаться? Здесь две стороны медали. Она может продолжить движение в любой далее находящийся объект, машина/дерево/отбойник/стена, что угодно.
Ага оставляя по пути все свои детали кузова. Так легко потерять колесо, это просто нечто... и метал как бумага.
I miss my X5, it was too expensive to maintenance. However I felt so safe in it compared to my current car made out of fiberglass
Which one you have now?
Notice the Volvo slowed down less on impact. That means less energy transfer to the passengers.
Yes (even though lateral forces are probably higher), but it could also divert the vehicle into other hazards. I'm actually really curious which method ultimately produces better real-world outcomes.
@@james64ibm In real world, the Volvo would apply full auto brake before crash. And if that was not detectable, the Volvo would apply full brake as soon as it senses the crash. In real world, nothing beats Volvo. NO ONE has been killed in an XC90 in the UK since it was released there in 2004. Yes, NO ONE - ZERO, 0!
@@Xanthopteryx right, and not also in UK. Here in Italy as well (proudly owner of an XC90 D5 AWD and a old school Land Rover Defender and a Alfa Romeo Duetto vintage). Volvos are very reliable and safe, and for us tall people are just perfect.
@@Xanthopteryx Love the braking in emergency, it does make a difference. I benefit from it like once a year lol.
Xanthopteryx That is because they do not inspire fast driving, especially at the limit. Owner of an XC90 DS Executive 2005.
0:33
" BMW crashes. "
BMW's mouth: WEEEEEEEEEE.
*GRILL
*0:33** Grill: "Ai'ght, imma head out."*
You can tell quality difference between Volvo and bmw just cause of the front grills
I liked how the entire Volvo hood flies off.
To my knowledge, there hasn’t been a recorded fatality in a Volvo XC90 in the UK
How many accidents have been caused by poorly driven XC90s? To my knowledge, at least twelve.
@@davecom3 And from today's standard for driving in the UK? That's really good.
По моему, ни одного смертельного случая в мире ,при аварии вольво XC90!!
Yeah, nobody drives that boring car anyway
@@lazyupload As if large SUVs weren't all boring anyway (except for the sporty variants maybe)
Finally everybody caught up with Volvo on small overlap test. Try the same test from 5-6 years ago :)
Seriously, the 2003 Volvo XC90 passed the small overlap crash test, if you look at iihs they use the 2003 version crash test through 2015. Let's see a 2003 BMW X5 in a small overlap, XC90 is a beast, of course the new X5 is very safe as well
A car from the 70's or so vs todays car would say much more about how important these tests are
Like this? th-cam.com/video/fPF4fBGNK0U/w-d-xo.html
А для чего?? Время же прошло и зачем назад смотреть чувак) время и люди ВСЕ давно впереди!
There is one very important thing here, as why I would chose and have chosen Volvo, that is the G Force felt inside the car. That is what will keep your internal organs in one piece. Volvo has managed to get lower G Force at impact. Best example is in this clip. See how the Volvo just lets all parts fly and it just moves away almost forward. The BMW is still great and safe, but the G Force is stronger, as it almost gets to a stand still before rolls away.
That here the volvo slipped off an obstacle is an accident, not a deliberate act. Making an advantage out of this is pure absurdity. I would never choose a Volvo because of the hopeless 2.0 engine in such a big SUV
Настолько безнадежном двигателе что унас 2 вольво было и за 15 лет не 1 поломки на 2 машинах@@tomciopaluch7235
1 продали потому что была слишком старая
Bmw grill is a bird 😂😂
0:34
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Lolololololol
Thats why they put a kia grille on new models, our favorite grille flew away 🤦♂️😂
이호재 어 한국인?
I’ve had 7 Volvos and my S60 saved my life when I was totaled by an 18 wheeler. I have a new XC90 now.
E eu tentando ter só uma Yamaha Neo 125 cc
Hello,you can help me?
Legends say that the grill is still flying
Another cheap copy paste.. why ppl try fish likes for things they cant come up with on their own..
@@lilkurd2000 this is a one 1year old comment motafaka
@@Vstylo yea and the other one is a 2 year old one.,.. idiot...
I’m old enough to remember when U.S. car manufacturers howled about having to install $25 lap belts in cars. Lap belts that many refused to wear. Those were the days of cars that rotted out in 5-years and roadside breakdowns were common. Car safety and reliability have come a long way since the 1960s. I bought my last American car -actually assembled with Mexican parts- in 1986.
Love the way both vehicles moved to the right so controlled and stable not like the Jeep that rolled over
Can’t tell which one is better. But 2016 vs 2019?
Volvo
VOLVO
All these fucking idiots saying volvo when the bmw did better.
BMW - Superior German engineering
Volvo - cheap chinese pos
@@Random-nf7qb Volvo you moron
@@Random-nf7qb cause the beamer is 3 years older then the Volvo
Rule no 1: Never compare a Volvo on safety with other Brands they are just too good with that aspect 🔥
I take it that you didn’t notice how the driver and driver side passenger doors both folded up? The BMW seemed like the driver would be able to up his own door.
Also notice the neck panels in the BMW compared to the Volvo. Not good.
I also grew up learning that Volvos were almost a guarantee against casualties but that has certainly changed.
Volvo (and SAAB) has always been the forefront of car safety. But this video shows that other manufacturers now have caught up with them. It at least BMW has. Both of these cars perform excellent. But I agree, the BMW seem to crumble less in the driver side. On the other hand the Volvo seeminly smooths/dampens the impact much more.
And technically, the Volvo got a lower overall score sure to their child seat lock mechanism
The BMW passed this test better dude
Too bad they’re pieces of unreliable chit
It's funny that the fact that Volvo accidentally slipped, fanboys of the brand try to turn into a great advantage. In tests of other Volvos such a thing does not occur. But the fact that their beloved brand even in a large SUV installs two 2.0 R4 engines does not bother them at all.
Easy to see which is better. Look at the deceleration rate. The volvo barely strafes rightwards and decelerates much less than the BMW, which means less stress on the occupants which means it’s probably safer.
Yes just what I was thinking
It just brushed the wall, off slighty to the side, still going straight
Very impressed tbh
????they both crash at the same spot and exact speed so the impact effect is the same on both drivers . If it keeps going it might hit another car wich is unsafe on the road ( real case scenario) and can cause another accident.... In the other hand bmw stopped in its place. Volvo clearly lost in this crash test
yTZ_FuLL Man I would chose the car that decelerates less a 100 times over the car that absorbs all the shock and stays at the impact spot. It’s basic physics. It’s rate of deceleration that kills you. Of course the car that continues it’s course could in fact hit something else on the way. But it’s a byproduct of making the car safer, there’s no other way.
It's also the 2016 xc90. Volvo is always the safest
The volvo keeps moving forward, possible into incoming traffic?
00:34 BMW launches a new category and gets awarded Outstanding in Grill Survivability right away.
The grill saved itself 😂😂
The volvo is like: I’m here for you bud! Don’t worry about me you’ll be safe. ;)
The BMW: I shall save my front grill!
Bmw: Crashes into wall.
Grill: Ight, imma head out
Sahibinden hatasız boyasız , kaskodan şişirilmiş hasar kaydı var , podye ve direkler de kesinlikle oynama yoktur
garaj arabası
Atma
BMW took into account that you may want to keep the grill as a souvenir 👌
Thanks
BMW saves the car, while Volvo clearly saves the driver.
Results show 2 us, BMW n Volvo r equal, u blind sucker :)
The inspirational music has inspired me to have a crash.
Haha, oh man. :D
😂😂😂
NO WAY HAHA
who can tell me what music it is. One of my friends would like to know.
0:33 that Grill is me walking out of group projects..
1:04 same with side mirror on volvo :D
0:33 Lol that Spongebob and Mr. Krabs song was in my head: A grill is a grill .....
Doesn't matter that the volvo looked more damaged, that's the point. Make the bodywork sacrificial to absorb the shock. The deceleration between the BMW and Volvo was evident, slower the deceleration the less chance of serious injury. Volvo safer but I'd still rather have BMW.
X5 isn't that behind the XC90 so me too with the BMW , they are just more sporty and fun to drive
I was looking at a BMV, but Volvo won out. I will still get a BMV at some point. And Volvo's safety was nearly tested a coupled of Fridays ago when I was came withing in an inch of being rear ended at full highway speed. Thank God that the XC60 has a lot of horsepower. I was able to go from a stop to the median shoulder in a split second to avoid the two vehicles that were coming right at me.
BMV is British Motor Vehicle, ja?
@@dima.jiharev 😁
@@dima.jiharevim guessing Bavarian motor vehicle
Honestly, saying "BMV" in English is closer to the correct pronunciation (bae emm vay) than spelling "BMW" in English (bee emm double you). So I suppose asking some German for a "BMV" car show would probably have higher chances of success than asking for "BMW", because those that don't know English will - in their head - likely translate "BMV" to "BMW", and those that know may do it as well in spite of theoretically knowing better. Some might notice but assume you meant "BMW" without asking, and only a really really really small fraction will know AND notice AND ask to clarify.
Dummy’s face imprint on the BMW airbag was perfect. It deserves another “green G” rating.
Exactly. And on the volvo the head snapped back wich is VERY Bad for your Spine. So in a real world Scenario the Person in the Bmw would have less Injurys than the one in the Volvo.
@@questionyourself718 Ehh, the Volvo missed the headrest, which would be there to prevent whiplash. I don't know why they leave it out in crash test?
@@r.gelmers6580 the bmw also missed the headrest if you go back and watch the video. But what i dont know is why both cars where tested without it.
While my Maruti Suzuki Swift laughing in the corner 😂😂
The music sounds like the test dummy just sacrificed himself to save humanity😂
🤣🤣
0:45 looks cool. You can see the BMW kidneys fly away from the inside...
He face planted it hard.
X5 wins for me, xc90 deformation of door at end shows about 150mm overlap with rear door = crash cell compromised. Still both are feats of amazing engineering.
Volvo is better whatsoever
@@tesla_models never ever
@@topfollower6964 what drive a bmw and you'll understand
@@tesla_models a tesla fan is talking about quality.... nothing more to say ;)
@@topfollower6964 yes I am not a toxic fanboy like you . I understand industry in a different manner. And I admit that volvos are far ahead of tesla in all aspects
Volvo slipped on wall so smooth. It must had generated much less energy than BMW. Lesser energy lesser damage to passengers
Smashing the car doesn't generate energy, it consumes it, leaving less energy to smash the passengers.
@@johndododoe1411 you clearly missed my point. There is given ammount of kinetic energy car has when going with certain velocity. Bending parts of car as you said consumes this energy. Volvo clearly slipped on obstacle smoother. What it means is that it lost less speed so it created less kinetic energy so impact was less damaging for passengers