I think the site model should also follow Phases, so I would use graded topo and Masses. The masses could be parametrized or locally placed as the old "pad".
Great video and workarounds, but I wish we had a real solution. I'm having a terribly difficult time with toposolids, mainly that I'm unable to see how the contours are being changed during the modify sub elements mode, and I'm unable to align points, among many other problems. Would you consider doing a video like this one about solutions / workarounds to common issues with toposolids?
Good morning, I would like to subscribe to your platform and I need information about the courses and where I can talk about it, please I will be waiting for the information
These Teposolids are a nightmare
Thanks for that...
I like your trees, any info on how you made them?
Amazing video and solutions.
I think the site model should also follow Phases, so I would use graded topo and Masses. The masses could be parametrized or locally placed as the old "pad".
Thanks !
thank you bro
Great video and workarounds, but I wish we had a real solution. I'm having a terribly difficult time with toposolids, mainly that I'm unable to see how the contours are being changed during the modify sub elements mode, and I'm unable to align points, among many other problems. Would you consider doing a video like this one about solutions / workarounds to common issues with toposolids?
Try the environment plugin
@@dddnl I have tried it, and it works, albeit slow and buggy. Hoping to see some solutions within Revit without paid add on software.
Thanks for sharing your knowledge. What if in the first file (toposolid) add the foundation and then just link the rest of the house or viceversa ?
We should use Civil 3D to create toposurface
Absolutely. Now try getting it to display in Revit sections and site plans cleanly.
Good morning, I would like to subscribe to your platform and I need information about the courses and where I can talk about it, please I will be waiting for the information