From Makeup To Military: The Changing Korean Male | Deciphering South Korea - Ep 2 | Documentary
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.พ. 2025
- South Korean masculinity is setting trends worldwide, powered by the country’s biggest stars. The face of the modern Korean man is unrecognisable from just a few decades ago, but does that mean male ideology has changed too?
Journalist Joi Lee investigates the changing Korean man and learns about the conflicted challenges they face. Whether it’s trying to navigate a softer style of masculinity, fulfilling their compulsory military obligations or learning to cope with the recently rising voices of women claiming their rights.
WATCH MORE Deciphering South Korea
Ep 1: • The Power Of Hallyu - ...
Ep 3: • Hell Joseon: The Price...
Ep 4: • Korea, The Tech Nation...
========
About the show: Journalist Joi Lee returns to South Korea, a country that has found global adoration in recent years. She explores what is driving this success and the price South Koreans are paying for it.
=================
#CNAInsider #CNADocumentary #DecipheringSouthKoreaCNA #SouthKorea #GenderEquality #Military #ChangingMan #Discrimination #Asia #KoreanMilitary
For more, SUBSCRIBE to CNA INSIDER
cna.asia/insid...
Follow CNA INSIDER on:
Instagram: / cnainsider
Facebook: / cnainsider
Website: cna.asia/cnain...
What's behind the success of K-wave? And what does it take to be happy in South Korea? Watch more as we continue Deciphering South Korea: th-cam.com/play/PLkMf14VQEvTavKsFL0I-pLCmelDO4WG6-.html
I am woman but would've been nice to have been reported via a male reporter's lens.
How to spot a bias? When interviewing the anti feminist wangja, the music back ground is heavy and scary, and the narrator said that wangja dressing as female is disrespectful. But interviewing the girl who dresses as man, the narrator and angle it takes is that it to help the women to overcome her fear of man. It is not characterized as a caricature when the woman dresses as man..rather it is a form of art. The background music is not dreary. So how can you blame the anti feminist movement here? The title of this documentary is supposed to be about masculinity and men..and yet the perspective of feminism about men is very much all round this film. I really fear for young man around the world.
Wow a man dressing up as a woman is viewed as disrespectful and charaterized as making a caricature of woman..but the presentor actually participated in disrespecting men and caricature of men when she dressed as a man. Wtf. Answer me please..the documentary is saying the anti feminists as spreading hate..but the presentor dressed up like a man and making a caricature of men..and that is not spreading hate??? Wtf!!!?
You should interview the stars in their 30s Some have been in the business for over 20 years. Some 25
Korean men's misogyny is too much.
They shut up women without even knowing feminism.
They argue that feminism is male hatred.
Foolish, ignorant, and vicious.
Please be interested in misogyny dominating Korean society and rescue our women.
I'm German and we had a mandatory military service for men too up until like the 2010s. My dad served in a special unit and mostly has fond memories of it, my uncle however was one of the first men who refused to serve in the 80s and did civil service instead. I get though why men could feel like something is taken from them and they do lose 2 years of their lives basically
Who the hell would want to serve in army in a country that fucks you in the ass every moment? In Finland we have mandatory military service and I just went to doctor and got exempted from it. No way I am cucking for the government
Why can't women be equally conscripted
@@ashkanzahoor7242 why don't men ask the men who made and continue to uphold these laws why women aren't conscripted?? Or why they need to keep upholding this law?
Thank you for your empathy for compulsory military service in korea. but it's not the main point. CNN is trying to distort the nature of the case. mandatory military service is not really issue, its been over 70 years in korea.
The real problem is that feminists have consistently portrayed them as privileged and potential criminals over the past decade, despite the fact that young Korean men are making more sacrifices. And there are hundreds of government-funded women's organizations, but not a single one for men. Policies that receive additional points simply because they are women or rent homes are pouring in.
Some of the people CNN interviewed are very extreme people and cannot explain things properly because of their position.
I am concerned that this documentary will distort the current situation and accommodate it in a way that is easy for them to understand
"Three quarters of the men have a beauty treatment done at least once a week"
Not True.
According to you?
@@cia4gent128 I have plenty of male cousins, not one of them goes to some weekly beauty treatments
Beauty treatment probably includes stuff like even just getting a haircut or going to a barbershop.
In Korea, while you are serving military, you are your country's property. There's no such thing as human rights. If you die while serving, no one will take responsibility except for some lip service for the media. Also, since it is a compulsory service, you get paid less than $400.00 a month which is way less than even minimum wage. Working 40 hours at minimum wage per week in Korea will get you around $300 before taxes.
What is a minimum wage got to do
with minimum wage when you have
to defend the country as a nation?
@@jaykim538 A nation is worth defending when people treat their soldiers with the respect that they deserve. I don’t see much of that in Korea. I brought up the minimum wage because I have seen young people being used to do errands for higher ranked officers that had nothing to do with defending the country and bullying is too common. To me they seemed like indentured servants than actual soldiers. You and I may have gone through the same thing, but it does not make it okay. A nation needs people, but people don’t need a nation to exist.
I think that sucks. The govt should pay more especially considering how wealthy Korea's become. All soldiers should be paid a living wage for defending their country. I guess I'm not understanding how some men are pointing their anger about this against women as an example of gender inequality. That the Korean govt's fault.
@@seamslatasha3598 Well, in early stage, there was an incident that some feminists went to take way one of few merits of finishing the conscription - merit in civil servant exam. Now, civil servant is one of most desired job among young people, so it isn't strange that some men are upset about it.
Anyway, the biggest issue is around affirmative action. Feminists in Korea see affirmative action is necessary for advancing its agenda. Right now, young men are also thinking they should be compensated with privileges(like job merit or quota for example) if the government have no money as traditional 'patriotism' brainwashing losing its effect. Unfortunately, while individually they might sound reasonable, in reality, one effectively counteracts the effect of the other, hence the 'gender war' is growing.
I learnt grit in the army. I didn’t mind not getting paid for the privilege of defending my country. Money isn’t everything. I leveraged what I learnt in the army and built a business.
This is what you get when you only interview youtubers. Walk down the street and meet a normal Korean male. What you see on the media doesn't define the Korean male definition of masculinity. I'm a Korean male with two kids, in my 30. I put all my effort into being able to provide for my family and be a better component of society. I try best to make my wife happy (though I fail miserably from time to time). I play sports, I have hobbies, and my time is spent between work and family. I have no time for these "beauty treatments". I/We can give up my personal freedom for the greater collective of our culture. For me that's masculinity. Being a responsible person to myself and my fam. Which included myself serving over 24months in the ROK Army. Don't see everything you believe. I run, lift, and take care of myself because being healthy matters. I have zero interest to look like the flower boys this presenter is portraying. This documentary is only the the skim of milk on top of your coffee. True Korean men knows what it takes to make sacrifices and understands the true meaning of grit. Korea becoming what it is now is not a serendipitous happenstance. This documentary is BS to a lesser degree. 70 years ago soldiers died so I can thrive under this freedom, our uncles fought for democracies, and our parents perspired blood to make this country the way it is. Yes, there are issues, but who doesn't? I plan to carry on the grit my forefathers taught me and plan to do so until I die. Next time, before you make such a shallow generalization of an entire demographic, go out and meet you a typical Korean male instead of meeting edge of the spectrum personas to justify your storyline. Stop bashing us and leave us be.
Agreed- there was a clear bias when interviewing people for feminism (eg the campaigners, scholars and educators) versus against feminism/alternative views (TH-camrs).
THANK YOU!!!!! She is only talking to TH-cam people.... I noticed that right away
Fringe sub cultures of feminism and anti feminism and young guys just out of high school, going into military is such a small, small portion of it and avoid the majority of people. Having said that, I've met both the kinds of people in this documentary. They exist, but I also think average Korean male engages in paternalism, low expectations and infantilism of women, extreme vanity, sexism, objectification of women etc. I know because I deal with Korean guys daily. It's even worse if you're a foreign woman.
Thank you, I'm so happy to hear that Korean masculinity is in a much better state than what this biased media piece portrays.
Now THIS is sounds like a normal Korean guy.
-A normal Korean guy
How to spot a bias? When interviewing the anti feminist wangja, the music back ground is heavy and scary, and the narrator said that wangja dressing as female is disrespectful. But interviewing the girl who dresses as man, the narrator and angle it takes is that it to help the women to overcome her fear of man. It is not characterized as a caricature when the woman dresses as man..rather it is a form of art. The background music is not dreary. So how can you blame the anti feminist movement here? The title of this documentary is supposed to be about masculinity and men..and yet the perspective of feminism about men is very much all round this film. I really fear for young man around the world.
They was trying demozing him for putting that background instrumental in his part.
I thought exactly the same, completely bias, and we haven’t seen the whole footage, who knows what’s been cut out at the editing room.
@@elden5052 His interview wasn't only 3 minutes long, they sure cut and edited since time lap are 47 minutes to interviewing 5 persons (i don't count but aprox is that number).
@@elden5052 I think Inkyu will explain it, i have seen one live where the woman and her crew who did this report talked with him while he was protesting on the streets and he accepted.
Skillfully spotted. Biased documentaries like this are contributing to the problem, while western white-girl wannabes continue thinking they're saving the world.
Very poor directing as well. The salient problems raised by the men are brushed aside with weak counter-arguments, making for an unconvincing watch.
Feminists: "We want unprejudiced treatment, regardless of gender!"
Also feminists: "Omg!! MaScuLinTy is in dEcLinE!"
True. Not only this video but also these "deciphering south korea" series are very biased. I'm very angry about CNA as Korean. They know nothing about Korea.
You know why they make out a humor against sexual assault cases on men? Because women are charged heavily compared to men assaulters. To give a further explanation, there was a recent news about a boyfriend killed his girlfriend and he got only 4 years in jail. There are numerous cases that woman killed her boyfriend/husband because of his severe violence.The jurisdiction system gives her over 10 years in jail because they saw it as 'intentional killing' when a guy kills a woman it is not 'intentional' more like a 'accidental' incident.
"One of the main reason that the term has lost its true meaning is to blame few prominent misandry groups - "Megalia" and "Womad""
Those Womad, Megalia and the ilk are simply Korean equivalents of Western man-hating radical feminism, and such a radical feminism has been one of the main branches of western feminism (along with Liberal feminism, socialist-Marxist feminsim and intersectional feminism).
Im not saying all kinds of feminism are gulity of man hating ideology, but it is also true it has been associated with radical feminism as well.
In this sense, man hating is an unfortunate part of western (and Korean) feminism.
To deny the ugly history of feminism by saying "but it's not true feminism.." is an intellectual dishonesty and distortion of the 'true' history of Feminism, be it western or Korean feminism.
Sorry, your beloved ideology is not that perfect and pretty.
@@희안-o1e Just to make you wonder.... How many times your government has trully represented whatever Koreans wanted? I know for sure that mine has done such thing very rarely.
Same with all the issues of hatred that everyone seem to carry on against entire countries for things that was literally directed by their governments.
Stop blaming entire groups for things that few people have decided to do.
What exactly are modern day feminists fighting for? I think an argument can be made that Korea is a matriarchal society. They have a woman on the $50 bill, female president, special reserved parking spots for women, reserved seats on trains, they don't have mandatory military service like men, men have higher likelihood of dying on the job, women have higher life expectancy than men, higher rate of female college graduates, women on average receive half the prison sentence as men for the same crime and criminal history, men have higher suicide rate, best selling authors are feminists, news media is dominated by feminist writers, etc.
This problem of men’s issues not being acknowledged and the Hypocrisy of the modern day “feminist” movement is also becoming a big issue here in the United States.
Also for me the worst part is that the newer generations are the one who are handed the bill for the sins of the older generation. Like of course they dont understand that everyone is mad at them and being accused of privilege they havent experienced.
*Disclaimer* the wanja over there which comments kept having sympathy with? Please don't. He has his records of domestic violence against his wife while she was pregnant and almost got her brain concussion. He forced his wife to wear sexy costumes for his broadcast even though she had just gave birth. He was casted out in high school because of his school violences . He got drunk and the victim almost lost his eye sights. He was with the extreme right wing activists gave hate speech to victims of incident Sewol and 5.18 movement(Korea's democratic movement). So please keep attention to who you keep sympathy with!
+ Wanja giving death threats and consistent blackmail to feminist protestors protesting not to watch spy cams ON STREET.
Yeah, dude looks unhinged especially out of the wig.
We like the message he spreads tho. It is a necessary message
@@benjerryhaagendaz His visual message seems to outweigh anything that comes out of his shouting mouth so kind of pointless. Also, if these allegations of domestic violence are true than that's scary that you think any thing this guy says is a "necessary message". You guys need to find a better rep for your cause.
@@seamslatasha3598 I’m more afraid for men everywhere since feminism has actual institutional power and privilege to shut down male conversions based on the flimsiest of what is appropriate.
Tell your feminists to police themselves first, otherwise it’s fair game. What he does is pretty tame and harmless.
The compulsory military experience part is very similar to what Singaporean men go through
@金城㱐 Yeah, but not for their military/political strength.
@金城㱐 Why can you defend you're Country without the US
in Norway both men and women. people should fight against it period, not both
Their military service is apparently much much harsher than our Singapore's though
그리고 00년대 출생들은 공감하겠지만
남녀차별이 피부에 느껴지던 세월은 부모세대인데 페미니즘은 90~00년대 젊은 여성들이 대부분입니다.
그리고 정상적인 생활을 하는 여성들은
페미니즘을 접할 기회가 거의 없었습니다. 한국의 페미니즘또한 온라인 커뮤니티를 중심으로 커져갔습니다. 그래서 젊은세대가 페미니즘을 지지하는 것이고요.
대부분의 00년대생들은 남녀평등, 여성가족부의 교육 아래서 아무것도 모른채로 교육을 주입받았습니다.
심지어는 '부모'라는 단어는 성차별적 단어라며 지양하라는 교육을 받은 기억조차 납니다. '부모'라는 단어에서 아버지 '부'라는 단어가
어머니 '모' 단어 앞에있으니, 성차별적인 단어다. 이런 논리였죠.
제게도 누나가 있고 여성들에 대한 왜곡된 시선 없습니다. 그리고 페미니즘을 하는 여성들중 대부분은
남성에 대한 경험이 없습니다.
그렇기 때문에 원초적인 남성혐오적 기질을 보이는 것이구요.
이는 어릴적엔 아무것도 모르니
사람끼리 외모를 보고 판단하고, 놀리는 그저 어린시절에 자신의 외모로 인한 주변아이들의 놀림에 큰 상처를 받고 현실을 도피해서 온라인을 떠돌다가 페미니즘에 정착한 경우가 대다수입니다. 이들이 불쌍하긴 하지만
대화로 설득할 수 없는 존재들입니다.
수많은 토론,설전영상이 있지만 그들을 끝내 설득한 사람은 없었습니다.
오히려 그들은 큰소리를 내며 화를 낼 뿐이었죠. 그리고 가부장적인 기성세대와 달리 90~00년대생들은
가부장적이고 묵묵한 전통적인 남자의 모습과는 매우 다릅니다. 이런 이해없이 단순히 한쪽의 의견만 듣고 굳게 믿는것이 페미니즘과 결탁한 몇몇 정치인들이 원하는 바 겠죠.
그리고 10년대에 여성인권이 급격하게 성장했다면 지금의 20대는 그때 많아야 10살이었다는 건데, 그들이 과연 여성인권의 신장에 적응하지 못했을까? 아무것도 모르는 그저 10살이? 너무 억지를 부리는거지.
기성세대 자신들이 만든 판에
북치고 장구치며. 그리고 지지하는 정당도 세대별로 다른것처럼 586 민주화 세대는 정말 보수보다 보수적이며 그 누구보다 사회주의 사상에 맞닿아 있다는 걸 느낌.
27:26 여기 마침 나오네요
특정 졍당을 지지하며, 20대 남성들이
보수를 지지하는것에 부정적인 견해를 내비치며 이상한소릴 하는.
대체 어느 20대 남자가 여성을 욕하는지 ㅋㅋ 페미니스트를 욕하는 건 봤어도 공격성을 말하는것도 웃긴게,
저런말을 한 본인의 세대가 저지른게
가부장인데 지금의 20대, 30대는
경제권조차 없어요. 뭐 다 그런건 아니겠지만 대부분의 사람들이
여자한테 져준다고요 ㅋㅋ 당신들 세대처럼 여성을 보호하고 내 아래로 보는게 아니라 사람대 사람으로 보되
내가 일부러 져준다. 이런 마인드라고요 ㅋㅋ 진짜 586세대 기성세대는 힘들구나.. 70,80대 할아버지들이 보수 지지한다면서 늙은이들은 투표 못하게 하자면서
20,30대 남성들이 보수 지지하니까
공격적인 젊은남성 ㅋㅋ 진짜 할아버지 세대들 돌아가시면 우리나라 어떻게 될지 막막하네
aman...oo,
협전아~ 남성혐오는 니들이 여자를 죽이고 성폭행하고 때리고 성희롱해서 생긴거야 남자끼리 자정하면 남성혐오는 없어질텐데 그것도 모르곸ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
Military service should be a paid job and voluntary. Not mandatory
Even for a country technically at war with its neighbour and two other bigger nations right beside you that would be happy to invade you at any moment?
I disagree, all male citizens should be liable for military service and without pay. But only if other preexisting conditions are present.
North Korea already has something crazy like a 10 year service for all men, a ton of nukes and missles that could reach Seoul in no time, and a delusional, mentally unstable dictator in control of all of it. This is why a 2 year service for S. Korean men is not “voluntary”…
Nonsense, technically South Korea is in the middle of a war. They cannot afford to think like this.
@@stuka80female citizens too or mandatory child raising If not military then
Most Korean men rarely use cosmetics.
Really? It seems like everyone uses it
@@Orientalfellowm Are you korean or have you lived in korea?
@@hdk4049 im not korean and bdw my statement is made because in media when something comes up about korea the males always look feminine in appearance thats what im trying to say
@@hdk4049 as someone not from korean we all see about ur country only through media or your celebrities..so mu assumption is made here
there's a difference in how westerners perceive cosmetics, they consider things like moisturizing lotions and face packs, not only makeup
(Korean man dresses up as woman to make political point) - Joi Lee: “OMG, so disrespectful!”
(Korean woman dresses up as man to make political point)- Joi Lee: “Yaaas queen, so empowering!”
Shows how American Joi Lee is
@@Laura-Yu very true. I really hope that Korea can resist succumbing to the woke political ideology that is turning America into a joke
Lol this is a bit exaggerated. Most Korean men can’t even tell the difference between shampoo and conditioner.
Have you seen those K-pop boy bands tho? 🤢🤮
@@phil20_20 I am talking everyday Korean men. No need to insult boy bands. You just come across insecure when you are attacking others’ masculinity or lack thereof.
@@phil20_20 different beauty standards in east Asia
Ever since conscription is not mandatory anymore in Germany, the army has had a hard time getting enough soldiers.
Well duh. Not everyone is made to be in the army, it's not all rainbows and sunshine. You literally have people killing each other there or committing suicide because of mandatory service in a nation they didn't choose to be born or be born a male. Not to mention same mandatory service pays bellow minimum wage and some have to use their own savings to survive and you're asking people to put their life on hold the years you could spend actually learning something or start getting job experience which women will have over males.
The reason USA has such an army is precisely because of the benefits and pay, of course some do join out of love for the country.
Like the same video at 19:07 pie chart and 27:50 interview says exactly why getting rid of mandatory service will = having a harder time getting volunteers
Given that it's an unprestigeous and poorly funded institution, that's not surprising.
Women form majority of the population so just conscript only women. Instant male-privilege gained. Feminist quick get behind this 👏🏻
@@xAvitaLT a lot of the anti-war and anti-military activists who also bitched about how big the US's defense budget fail to realize that when you have a volunteer arm force, you have to have some incentive for people to join.
@@xAvitaLT wait why would they spend their savings to survive? Doesn't military cover all of their living expenses?
The reason we are still deciphering this is because we continue to place men in a box With our own perceived ideas of who they should be. Why not let the universe gel organically. We cannot have equal rights if we pick and choose what the rights are. Men serve, women serve.
Universe did it's thing organically thousands of years ago. When we were hunter gatherers, in caves and tribes roaming the earth for survival. Everything you see today in modern society, including social constructs is us "picking and choosing" what rights are. As much as we try to create "equality", the universe is not, biology is not either. We all have our strengths, weaknesses, privileges and struggles. I do believe very human should have equal rights, but I wonder if in our quest for "equality" and "fairness" in life, we have forgotten what we really are. If the animals around us behaved like we did they would be extinct before we had the chance to wipe em out with our activities.
@@Kareem-cx4fi nah women just want equal pay and to be protected from sexual and physical abuse…yknow, just like the guy’s do.
@@seamslatasha3598 Lies!!! I don't want to be protected from sexual abuse! I want women to touch my penis.
Men: have mandatory military service, nearly 2 years of their lives.
Narrator: "Men feel like women are favored in society"
Women: "We want equality"
I'm gonna make a wild guess that conscription isn't something Korean women are actively seeking.
Why not just abolish the conscription?
@@NightRainDream Because South Koreans think they need to have 'manpower' in case of emergency(sudden collapse of NK). If SK just wants to stay at half of the peninsula, maybe it could be abolished... but the last thing SK wants is having current border shared with China. In other words, as long as SK pursuits unification with NK, it won't go away any time soon.
So because men are conscripted they should be revered and served by women? How about the lifetime of servitude and often abuse Korean women are born into bc it is the societal norm? I guess that's ok.
@@seamslatasha3598 "Men serve mandatory 2 year conscription - WOMEN MOST AFFECTED!"
@@flioink oh I’m sorry, you’re an idiot. I didn’t realize.
Some people might think that all Korean men became anti-feminist because they were taken away their privileges. But no, it's not. Only Korean young men, especially under 40s, are anti-feminist. Because they are equalists.
They don't think that they are superior than women. They had watched their female friends who took top tier score of GPA and being voted student presidents. Young male were no sad for that. Actually they don't have any feeling about that because it's so natural.
However, women accuse them as some kind of predators who take all money and all superior positions because young male are also men. Korean middle aged men, who actually have "all power and all money", agreed with that so they try to give benefits to women. 'The boomers' enjoyed their men privileges when they were young so they try to change laws and systems for women. It's some kind of pay off debt.
Until a few years ago, when taking civil service exams, additional points were given to those who completed their military service. However, the Supreme Court overturned it because the women's group claimed that it was discrimination against women. When recruiting police or firefighters, women take an easier fitness test. The government budget for women's organizations is increasing.
Finally Young Korean men burst that 'What the fuxx is this? Why would government and society eager to give privileges and benefit only for women? I also have no money and no job! I finished my military mandatory but no reward of that but mocking from young women'.
There is no conflict between men and women in Korea. It's only that millennial men verses millennial women with middle aged men who supported for them.
"Finally Young Korean men burst that 'What the fuxx is this? Why would government and society eager to give privileges and benefit only for women?" because women were oppressed for century... god so dumb
women are not pushed to go in certain industry or even drive away by the society, how many female teacher u had in comparison to male one??? women are always pushed in low paying job with little to no career possibility. now compare that to science field jobs... guess what almost all male.
if u are mad because disadvantaged group are helped to raise and catch up with the rest u are just a privileged individual scared that u will lose your privilege.
equality scare u when u were the one with the hand on the side of the handle of the knife
@@sofypi7493 *in the past. What a dumb argument. So now women should get more benefits because in the past they were disadvantaged. Sexist to the core.
I am a Korean man in his 30s.
The problem of gender discrimination began in the 2010s when women's organizations demanded extra points that were given to men who had served in the military in the civil service examination, the most popular job in Korea.
Normally, women start to enter society at the age of twenty-four years old and men at twenty-six years old, assuming that they have graduated from college.
In Korea, men usually have to buy a house when they get married.
In terms of cost, it's 90% male and 10% female.
I think discrimination is that men have to pay most of the money when they get married, although they enter society two years later than women.
Honestly, men are absolutely okay with women having equal rights and even advocate for it. But problems arise when so-called feminists pick and choose "equal rights" only when it suits them. You can't have it both way, ladies.
Gender issues are tough. This story was at the forefront of discussions in the U.S. years ago.
On the one hand, it's obviously wrong for a glass ceiling and a gender pay gap to exist. On the other, a major discussion point arose on public platforms like Reddit about a small but vocal minority of feminists that diverged from the core message of gender equality to one of being anti-men which bashed men at every opportunity. Some media took this and ran with it which normalized bashing men and made it acceptable whereas it's obviously taboo to bash on women.
Then you have a generation of young men who had not been a part of the patriarchal society that caused these problems in the first place become resentful when they notice that this disparity exists. The most psychologically affected ones become the anti-feminists (or worse, anti-women) which then feeds the cycle of converting more feminists to becoming anti-men and gives rise to popular media figures like Jordan Peterson that feed off this discontent.
Korea is even more complex when you factor military conscription that halts your professional life for a year and a half but women expect men to be as professionally successful or more than they are before even being considered for dating.
I have no answers but the discussions always end up being so toxic that I don't really want to be involved one way or the other.
well written analysis, I think I agree 100% with the above. Unfortunately there is no easy fix, maybe next generation will solve it
I agree with most points, but I feel that Koreans generally lack empathy for others, like how these Korean men don't try to understand that these women clearly don't like how chauvinistic they can be, and that they should try not to be the type of men the women dislike, and instead go after the government and the older generation for creating such a culture.
@@Melcor2304 why would you generalize korean men like that? Have you not thought that this act in itself is very sexist?
@@moorepwr because from what I have seen from real life and in the video, Koreans in general lack a sense of empathy for others, like how the older generation would rather the younger generation go through the same suffering as them instead of trying to make things better for younger generations.
And when these young people become seniors, they want to emulate the authority of the seniors before them, and prefer that feeling of superiority , forgetting the pains they felt when younger, creating a never ending cycle.
@@moorepwr don’t know if you’re trolling, but you can read articles on chuseok which reveals more on this.
I like kpop & kdramasa but im so glad i dont live in this country. Their lives look and feel so stressful.
Personally, I would not thrive or survive in such a pressure-filled environment. I live in Africa where life is not rosy, but there is no pressure to be beautiful or be an overachiever. For that I'm grateful.
yeah basically all east asian country (except north korea) have similar problem, it's very stresfull to live there
Lol trust me it's not that bad here
@@COYS-o2i I love your profile name 😀
Every country has problems that will cause stress. Racism, gun violence, poverty, corruption, competition, pollution, lack of freedom, etc.. etc..
Where a person wants to live will depend on what they are willing to deal with.
@@testingnow144 but some of us can live consequence free even when we chose alternative lifestyles...i personally would not survive in such a pressure filled environment. I'm poor but i don't have to feel like the scum of the earth for some of my life choices.
양심적 병역 거부자에 대해 엄격한 이유는 악용할 우려가 높다는거겠죠.
양심적 병역 거부자를 인정하고 군대에 안가게 해준다면 너도 나도 악용해서 군대에 안가게 될 가능성이 매우 높고
북한과 휴전상태임에도 불구하고 병력에 공백이 생기는 사태까지도 일어날수 있다는 생각이 있겠죠.
The youtuber at the start, hyojason. I think what he's doing is the equivalent of what the teacher wanted but could not give. By getting a head-start and making these teens' first exposure to the military a positive thing, it can help shift the negative light surrounding military participation.
Overall, good documentary. It makes me think almost, if SG is heading down a similar path
People who oppose mandatory military service seem to mostly come from priviledged and safe countries....be glad and never take your safety for granted please
My husband is Korean and he was insulted when I bought him anti aging face moisturizer lol so the bit about cosmetics surprised me. FYI he does use it now. ☺️
He uses your eyeliner too. Just letting you know.
No wonder South Korea's fertility rate is lowest in the world.
The expectations placed on men are ridiculous. Serve in the military, have a good education, have a high paying job, get contempt from society or media if unsuccessful.
I do not know if the divorce laws are biased in the favour of women like they are in most countries, that could be a factor as well.
how are laws in favour of women???
@@elodeduvenhage7695 Well (in the US) there's an implicit bias for judges to award custody of children to women even in cases where their father would be a better caretaker. There's also the same bias applied when deciding how to split the assets. There's more but those are the two things that popped up off the top of my head.
@@NiSE_Rafter but most won't need custody for kids
as they would better consider it to remarry and have new kids
But for women
Mostly she considers thing that their won't be abducted in her new marriage
@@pikachuthunderbolt3919 dude wtf? What matters is who can raise the children best or who is more for to raise children, not the convenience of who can get more children easier. The wellbeing of the child/children should always be first priority.
@@elodeduvenhage7695 Laws are applied in the favour of women. Look up the countless cases of false domestic violence that women add on during divorce battles which are taken up without due evidence.
Women get much higher alimony than men when they are not breadwinners.
Women get primary child custody in a majority of the cases, with the assumption that a mother is more imp to a chipd's development.
Men are jailed and met with state violence if they lose their jobs and are unable to pay alimony/child support.
In the Netherlands men do not have a draft anymore. Women on average still graduate in shorter times with higher grades in higher numbers. And when these women have kids they have to take a step back from their careers or lose their jobs altogether. Or are presumed that they might have kids and get skipped over for promotions altogether. And why not have women be drafted as well.
Korean women are like kids =_= They always want to be protected by male, and man to do for girls. That's all. 😄
I also am confused how do men not understand this. Even in the west - when women have a child, they will most likely be losing out on career opportunities, but if they don''t want to have children, then the society goes after them, because CHILDREN yada yada.. A woman with a full time job, children, AND married to a man that doesn't want to contribute to chores in a meaningful way puts extreme stress and burden onto the woman. And then the same man will go around and complain about his shitty, nagging wife, that doesn't let him sit on the sofa all day.
@@numberone-rz7jb yeah, I’m sure your mom would totally agree with you.
@Eszra Falcontail It is probable that a lot of men would also like to spend time with their children alone.
Because the war in Korea will be a very brutal war of attrition. The Korean army cannot retreat even 100 meters. Everyone must stop the enemy and die on the spot. Women cannot be expected to wage these wars, and the political burden of a mass death of women is incomparable to that of a mass death of men.
now i know why the birth rate of south korea drop drastically * - *
Industrialization has way more to do with it. Which contemporary countries have industrialized the fastest? Japan, SK, China. The more artificial daily life becomes, the less time + money couples have to reproduce. This has happened in every single 1st world country.
I think in almost every country the problem with it is similar.
Non of this movements is entirely wrong and right.
As the girl said about anti-feminist that they are so concentrated on their opression that they don't see opression of other gender. I think the same statement can be applied for the feminist.
In idealistic sitution media and politics should cover problems of both gender in 50:50 ratio, but that doesn't seem to happen and that might cause frustration.
If we talk about not equal wages, sexual assault towards woman, domestic violence, we should also talk about Social pressure towards men that leads to depression and really high suicide statistics, domestic violance towards men, that no one is talking about, or worse is making fun of.
Education about violance and abuse, this aspect is still in my opinion purley covered, how is that people still accept the fact that woman can hit the men because he cheated or he flirted with another girl. It is violance, but nobody seems to care about it.
That are my thoughts as a woman and a human. If we want to have similar rights Let's look and talk about all the problems without pinpointing who has it worse.
Sorry for my english, it's not my native
Exactly what I was thinking, you took the words out of my mouth. Men face just as much discrimination, harassment, violence, and pressure from society but it goes unnoticed and nobody in mainstream media talks about it. This is why male suicide rates are 3x higher than women. The truth is simple, both men & women have problems that need attention but neither one should be given priority or treated differently than the other. There needs to be a mutual understanding in order to make any meaningful progress.
see you're a woman telling this. I have seen so many women telling the same which means we care about them. . you should see instagram feminist pages talk about expectations from a man and his burdens, y'all just don't pay attention to it and just nitpick on feminism. I don't get the 'man hating' part bcs what do they even do? just tell on the internet they hate men? or k*ll or bury men fr ? Because people are so concentrated on men when they're feeling a little difference. It honestly hasn't made much difference , women stilll get assaulted, r*ped, k*lled, what did the ' feminism' or 'man hating' do ? absolutely nothing. So why are y'all so uncomfortable about this? I get the "we should be equal' part but did men care? Did they support equality? Imagine wanting the oppressed women to speak on men's issues instead of actually supporting equality?
I don't want burden on men but do they want the same for women? If they did , this wouldn't be turning out like this. ****About your last point, its not about who has it worst, its about who actually cares for equality . Men are barely feminist but they want feminists to talk about their problems, sounds very hypocritical to me. It seems they never want equality for women but now women are fighting for it, they suddenly remembered their own struggles.
@@BK-mk3vi I think the difference is that a lot of problems for women stem from their direct mistreatment from men while men are mistreated by other men and their govt.
@@seamslatasha3598 I don’t think so. Many women are capable and do exhibit sexism towards men. The reason why men are angry is because society doesn’t care about men so the abuse goes unnoticed. For example, especially somewhere traditional like Korea if a man does not have a good job, salary, looks, etc. he is not considered marriage material to be a good husband. Men are judged for their gender constantly and if you complain you are laughed at. There is tons of pressure for men to get good jobs, provide, go to military, beauty standards from kpop etc and if you don’t you are considered a failure of a man. Women get treated unfairly, but so do men. It’s not one sided, women can mistreat men as well, but society doesn’t care so it goes unnoticed. As a result this frustration turns into anger redirected at society.
@@BK-mk3vi I promise you the sexism experienced by women is ten times what any man in Korea or in the world experiences. That’s ridiculous to compare. It’s one thing to say that men experience societal hardship but why blame women for that? That has to do with Korea’s social structure and their submission to authorities and their reverence of the rich and good looking all of which are virtues constructed and marketed by men in power yet bc chauvinism is so normal all of that blame is put on women bc God forbid that a women have a higher station in life if a man can’t manage it first. Why put the blame on women instead of fighting the real ppl in power; the super rich and corrupt most of whom are men.
I'm a S.Korean but I've never use Cosmetic care items. So it's very very weard. ㅋㅋ
When he dressed up as a Woman its "disrespectful, "what if i tell you i don't think its funny?" and when she dressed up as a Man performing on stage in-front of a large no of audience its "Interesting" ??Very clearly shows how biased the interviewer was!Both have valid points and both should protest,that's equality.Why women of same qualification performing the same as men will have pay gap just because of gender?Why stricter laws not being brought forward for spying on women through cams?Why men should be compared to insects?Why men should be ridiculed by some women because they lost 2 years in military service and hence having lower financial status?Why women should be sexually harassed at workplaces?Why the burden of buying a house,car,providing financial security fall on the shoulders of men only?Why not both women and men contribute equally in terms of household chores and financial responsibilities when trying to create a family together?Why not work together instead of bashing each other?Why not pick someone up when they fall and be a shoulder to lean on irrespective of gender?The term "Feminism" has been misused by some women as "Male Bashing" and that is unfortunately causing some men to be against "Feminism". True "Feminism" is not male bashing or pulling the men down or hurting him,true "Feminism" is demanding equal rights across all aspects of lives,equal pay among equally capable people irrespective of the gender,stopping female harrasments and giving equal opportunities to Women as given to Man
On point
I can feel for both sides of the coin but i think though the risk wth the 'anti feminist ' Movt. really is it may just drive more fire & hatred,I just really wish I could learn to speak Korean . Koreans are awesome :)
Really enjoying the series on South Korea
This documentary has been amazing so far, I’ve learned a lot!
I agree. 👍
It is interesting narratives from a limited western binary filtered view on masculinity and the reporter seeking only to support her reporting..hilarious. I think Korean women should also serve military like Israel so that they become more equal in society. Korea needs to move away from the orthodox Confucianism period. By the way, what's wrong with wanting to be strong and beautiful?
Agree with you on many levels.
What's funny is korea women are never grateful to their own soldiers
@@나람-t2o That's the paradox of entitlement. The more spoiled people are, the less they appreciate what they have.
Or just make it voluntary like the u.s.
So do Israel has high gender equality rights? There's no such thing as sexual violence in Israel lol.
CNA please stop these smearing series upon some of the greatest and most progressive countries in Asia (Japan, Korea), I expect more from your channel; not spewing/regurgitating western propaganda. I haven't watched this, just skip straight to the last minute for the talking-head concluding remark. It's just what I'm expected, a piece of feminist crap from white-washed Asian women (director, host,...). My apology for the ad hominem (it's probly true though) and yes, I'm an Asian man.
30:17 Never anywhere was feminism about women's rights or equality, it was always about hatred against men, having all possibilities and chances without having any duties. This I say as woman and anti-feminist from Europe.
And why is it disrespectful for a man to dress up as a woman for a demonstration act, but sooo wonderful for a woman to dress up like a man on stage for demonstration purpose? Isn't this again typical for feminism, to judge completely different on alike actions?
Thank you for this comment. It is exactly what happens in Poland right now. The feminists are not about the equality (the equality is already here for decades!). They have the same rights, pay gap in Poland does not exist and women are protected even better than men (especially when it comes to custody over children and alimony after a divorce - in 95 out of 100 cases the woman will get both the custody and the money). The modern feminists are only about the hatred towards men and special treatment for women. They are allowed to openly say „we hate men” but it does not work both ways. If you would say something like this as a man, they would call you an incel or a fascist, you would also get banned on social media. What a strange world we live in and I am afraid that it is only going to escalate even more.
@@Nidraell So true. Well, the main reason for feminism is supposed to be about women's rights and in work places and women's right to vote, etc. In Germany, they even name the latter "Frauenwahlrecht",which is totally absurd, because there never has been anything that established women's right to vote. In fact, in was simply the general right to vote and there were more men allowed to vote for the first time than women voring for the first time.
In fact, if you strip feminism in it's beginnings from any propaganda slogans, then feminism prooves to be nothing else but a political instrument to gain great numbers of cheap workers, and then it moved on to be a political instrument to destroy all traditional systems such as families, etc. When the men in Western / European countries went on strike to receive more money for their labor, so they would be able to provide for their families, women were incited to break their husbands' strike. So instead of stnding by their men, they started taking over their work for even less money, which resulted in men not finding jobs and then being kicked out by their "hard working wives". How shameful is this?! And yet feminism is still being propagated, even by men, which I cannot understand at all. Also, it's the feminists shaming other women more than any patriarchal man could ever do, as women staying at home to care for their families are being contantly degraded as lazy and dumb. In Germany the usual term to dehumanize family women and housewives is to call them "house cricket at the stove", in German this would be "Heimchen am Herd", instead of really fighting for women's rights by demanding proper social insurance and compensation for the resulting vacancies on the labor market.
OMG I could go on and on with this subject. I cannot comprehend why so many people still fall for this "feminism" propaganda. One of the sad realities is, that through feminism we hardly have any real men around anymore. LOL I know that some ras will come out and shoot at me because I wrote all this. XD
I sensed that the anti-feminist guy seemed to have this deep anger and it seems like he can't stand to see someone else elevated unless he is also elevated. Like his self worth is dependent on always being on top.I don't think he has a concept of what true equality is.
I can understand being resentful that the military conscription isn't totally universal...but how do the men justify the pay gap?
As of now, an extremist misandry group in Korea has been exploiting all the true feminist movement and basically has hijacked them to express hatred toward men. There is a group called "Megalia" and "Womad" which are extremist groups who claim that all men should be punished for the patriarchal history. They literally make memes out of a boy being sexually harassed by females and glorify females who are abusive to male partners.
They've become more prominent in public media by disguising themselves among real "feminists", and provoking unnecessary tensions within the society. Their purpose has been to antagonize "feminism" in Korea in an attempt to provoke people like Wangja, who inevitably will be easy to target as a Misogynist. I really hope people try to learn more about the entire situation holistically, instead of simplying saying "men bad, women good."
I think the fact that both countries with a very wide wage gap and countries with a very small wage gap came out of Northern Europe, the most gender-equal region in the world, shows the illusion of the gender wage gap.
A more obvious trend is industry structure. The more the industrial structure depends on heavy industry, heavy chemistry, semiconductors, and IT, the wider the gender wage gap becomes. It is no coincidence that Finland is among the top countries for the gender pay gap.
S t f u. Typical white woman who knows nothing trying to demonize asian men. Your whole life is being pampered and being served with silver spoon while asian men are forcefully drafted into military and other services.
That's rich. Men want gender equality in the military but don't want gender equality in society.
True!
feminist Marxist spotted
Surprisingly, I feel like the intentions behind that protestor is valid. Feminism shouldn't be about attacking guys, but more about reaching a balance, if not a compromise. However, the youtuber's sense of humour clearly comes from a place of spite. The delivery of the message twists the entire message and blinds others to the message itself. I hope they will find better ways of reaching out, besides cross-dressing and attacking
pls you never dated women want someone who earns more, is tall , and is more handsome than their dad could ever be while men just want anyone and can't cause their asses is stuck inside all day studying than serving the country, being told they look too masucaline getting on hormones blockers the country is made for women and soy boys not masculine men. the entertainment industry echos that you can say whatever you want but check the suicide rate for males in Korea before you think he is wrong for showing emotions the man has definlty seen his close friends, other men suffer that's why he is like that you think oneday a mf just wakes up hating no it takes time and its warranted. Ig freedom of expression to you just like the feminist is not allowed common facists
I am a Korean American.
I don't know any Korean man using
cosmetic as CNA describes here in
America. But, I guess, Korea might be different.
She’s basically talking about men in Korea
@@proverbs31university None of my male cousins do this. So no, she’s not accurately representing most Korean men, just the ones living the glamour style probably living in Seoul.
배인규는 반페미가 아니라 친페미임.본인이 페미제조기라서 ㅋㅋㅋ
ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
어둠의 페미니스트인거지 ㄹㅇ 다크나이트
There are some misleading and unsubstantiated claims in this documetary that are so remote from the real life of average Korean male, they are almost offensive. Three quarters of Korean men receive facial treatment at least once a week??? I found a reference for this from a global survey in 2018, which only said "75% of Korean men use skin care products more than once a week". Isn't "facial treatment" much bigger word for this??? It is also mentioned that Korean male uses an average of 13 costmetic products each month. Seriously??? I looked up and found out that this number 13 was from an online survey data in 2015 that asked what kind of personal care items they used. The 13 items included shampoo, hair conditioner, body cleanser, liquid soap, lotion, shaving foam, lip balm, hand cream, deodorant, perfume, etc. Can you really call all these "cosmetic products"??? What is worse is even if there was just one response for an item, that was counted and included in the 13 items, which is ridiculous. Among the 13 items, only shampoo (98.7%), lotion (87.2%), and body cleanser (76.3%) received more than 70% response rate from male, while many of the rest such as nail care item (???) was just negligible. The world is harsh, and the absolute majority of us Korean men are busy trying to get by with our lives, supporting families. Flower boys are not prevalent in the streets in Korea. We simply wash and put some lotion on. Please don't portray us as whom we're not.
What do South Korean citizens think about BTS possibly getting exempted from military service? Are they pro or against it?
Most Koreans are against it.
@@moorepwr a Korean too lol
@@moorepwr Constitution vs money they wouldn't make during that time = money wins every time.
@@moorepwr There is no exception.
@@moorepwr Hell. No.
So you went to the TH-cam soldiers room and wore his clothes? Lol. Got it. ;)
Wow a man dressing up as a woman is viewed as disrespectful and charaterized as making a caricature of woman..but the presentor actually participated in disrespecting men and caricature of men when she dressed as a man. Wtf
I do see your point, but the situation for each case was different. The man was trying to provoke whereas the woman was expressing herself artistically. He was outside in public, she was in an art stage.
I think dressing as the other gender gives a sense of liberation from gender roles, so I think it’s this social rigidity that both are victim to. I think otherwise you’re missing the forest for the trees.
@@koreanjaefish so dressing as a man, "artistically" visualizing a man as an old drunkard, as a out of style uncle, as an evil like being, for you this is not provocative?? It is more provocative actually..since the artist implies that "this is what men are look how old ugly and evil they are" whereas the male protestor just dresses and acts as himself
@@koreanjaefish so an artistic expression cannot be provocative? A protest in the streets is public whereas inside a studio with strangers it is private? This rigidity are you talking about, does it mean the mainstream media being so rigid and have one perspective so as to always promote its ideologies like feminism even in subtle tones in every content they produce? Just look at this a documentary about man and in the end its promoting ideologies of feminism, and pushing for acceptability of radical elements of it..just like this acceptance of blatant disrespect of image of man through the "artistic" expression? I ask you what if a male do this, dress a the worst version of females, like an old hag, or a slutty bitch, or overbearing ugly mother?? Do you think mainstream media will consider this as artistic?
Yeah I also thought that part was weird. I'm surprised she didn't compare that aspect in the video
@@larpo05 It's less important that he was dressed as a "woman" but that he dressed like that got on top of a car on a public street with a bullhorn and yelled unintelligibly about who knows what and then went to "talk" with a feminist organization and was surprised that they called the cops on him. Anybody would view that as aggressive and potentially threatening bc the dude was looking and acting crazy. She put on drag to see if dressing like that made her feel more masculine. She wasn't out and about aggressively shouting her views onto unwelcome ears. If you can't see the difference in their intentions than God help all of us.
Shout out to the teacher 👍☀️
What rights did South Korean women not have?
They should also be required to serve in the military like all men, since they want equal rights.
Someone cancelled my reply or I don't know. Anyway, women in south korea, face street harassment, male violence against women and so on. Like all women on this planet, even if many still can't or don't want to face the reality of it.
In any case, having rights, doesn't mean "serve to military", the best will be if anybody would never face any war, children, women or men.
@@n3493 I’m sorry, but feminist special interest organisations undermine democracy. They print articles/headlines that go against the voices of the significant modern anti-feminist population. They even misrepresent and de-platform their critics.
Even the feminists group admitted their unpopularity in the video.
Going forward, the gen z men (& women) are going to vote steadily against male only discrimination in laws and misandry in South Korea.
@@benjerryhaagendaz that is strange. I don't get how a person can be anti feminism. Or this person isn't oppressed, can't recognise she isn't, or simply is the oppressor. Your comment doesn't make sense to me. I pity the human race, for being the way it is.
@@n3493 that is strange… (feint puzzlement).. that’s exactly what I think of you too. And 70% of South Korean young men would say the same, including non feminist women.
Only minority (modern) feminist agree with you
@@benjerryhaagendaz you probably are a teenager. And one frustrated teenager's opinion, isn't worth any other attention.
Those two anti feminists protestors (Wangja and his friend) are spot on.
The comments here are all from men who are blinded by their own frustration. You guys don’t understand that Korea is super conservative and and has always been like that. Women couldn’t join the military back then because why? Men thought it would make women manly.
Even now the Korean society is hard on women, they’re expected to be a working mum whilst also having to clean the house and look after in laws.
Why should men make all the choices for women?
Women can’t even read a book about feminism without getting hated on and then when a man does it, it’s intelligent?
The anti-feminist guys remind me of Alex Stein.
Hm. Why was there no mentioning whatsoever concerning some guy's extremely grave accident during his military service which was made fun of by some militant "feminist" group? He lost "something" which is not funny at all. Neither were those female extremists mentioned. I can't remember their group's name right now, but how they behaved was utterly disgusting. As far as I know, this was an incident that triggered many men's reaction concerning "feminism", which I - a woman and mother of two sons, by the way! - actually understand very well. Extremely biased SJW documentary!
Agreed, right now Korea needs to sit down and talk it out..
I’m sick and tired of these patriarchal men and feminazi groups like Megalia and Womad constantly being at each other’s throats..
I don’t get how constantly trying to be the most oppressed group and having mutual pity parties (full of physical/mental abuse) is doing anything to help anyone.. The only thing they’re doing is riling each other up even more leading to extreme consequences.
Both groups have aspects where they’re being oppressed, they need to realise this and build each other up to work together so things can get fixed.
Because right now they’re doing nothing for the greater good, they just want to be on top. That isn’t the equality they should be striving for, that is extremism..
Feminism=equality= everyone is equal. Men and women are the same, we both have lots of great people and some really bad people, but at the end of the day we’re all human and we will all die some day, so why be angry for the purpose of destruction?
I really don’t understand humans sometimes? Why do we have to make life so angry for others and ourselves?
Be happy and healthy and stand up for yourselves, that’s all you need to do, this anger with no real purpose will do nothing upon your death..
(Did anything of what I said make sense? I’m sorry if this feels too much like rambling, I have autism and have difficulty putting together my thoughts for others to understand.. I hope what I said makes sense, please let me know if I sound like a madman rambling, then I can get someone to write it out for me..)
@@Mello_Loves_Mujin Nope. I couldn't agree more and you're absolutely right.
And don't worry, you don't need anyone to write your thoughts for you, it's fine! Megalia, that's the name I couldn't remember. They were the ones who said the guy deserved what had happened to him. I was
(and still am) so disgusted... Thanks for your answer 👋
@@kingfisher9725 Megalia has shut down like in 2015. There is no "Feminist" website. EVen though there are misogynic websites where those Megalia site has used for mirroring, has not shut down. And those women were making fun of soldiers because even though women could have a faster entry in the society, the society wants men who finished their militant services. There are many cases found that Korean companies cut their female interviewees and hire men even though female interviewees have higher scores. Korean patriarchal companies give men most raises just because they are men. Men formed their special bond because they went to military services and use it to discriminate and neglect women in their work space.
So its disrespectful to dress like a woman but not like a man? Your double standards really show in this documentary. I’m not surprised though.
More like human rights equality that should be addressed. Men and women are different with different roles and different biological traits.
If mandatory military only for men then maybe right of age women should also learn the skills as basic combat emergency nurses 🤔 T&C applied. So this will put equal mandatory for both genders just different roles.
Just my opinion 🤷
I agree.
Make it mandatory for most of the population but don't base it on gender
Lol its like saying "i want to win the championship but i dont want the best players"
What good would a woman be on the frontlines, honestly? There are so many ways women could support the war effort (if it ever comes to this), that do not involve them being in the army.
To me, it seems like men are being oppressed in Korea, but women aren't the villain: the (male) ruling power is. If mandatory service is necessary, they should have mandatory labour for women as well. Since women have a physical disadvantage,it would be unrealistic to give women the same functions as men. They could either make other civil service mandatory, or they could make other military functions mandatory, related healthcare, administration, education, mechanics, technological development, etc.
At the same time, women may be oppressed too, but then again: the bitter men aren't the villain, and neither is the ruling power. They fall behind on careers because their parents raised them differently to their brothers, because men with corporate power don't see the strength in femininity, and because they & their friends maintain their own internalized misogyny. And they are the victim of male physical violence including rape, because of their biological disadvantage combined with the fact that men aren't taught to handle their emotions well enough.
Good documentary but I noticed some bias from the reporter against Wangja & his boss. On feminism, it's not just in Korea but across the world where the movement initially started out to emancipate women (1st wave feminism) has now evolved into a man-hating philosophy (3rd wave feminism) at it's most extreme forms. Bottom line is, there are many problems & societal pressures with both genders but nobody ever talks about men's rights and thus why so many modern young men feel oppressed.
There is great irony in that statement - men feel oppressed. Men have defined roles pretty much forever. Any box they believe they are in, they created. It may well be not that men are oppressed, but that being male will no longer guarantee certain privileges, some of which men can't even see as privileges because they have always been there. Women want to stand on the same ground, at the same level and be treated as people just as men want to be treated as people. Genitalia should not define or limit a person's place in the world.
@@flocontour9682 “Women want to stand on the same ground…genitalia should not define or limit a person”
There is great irony in this statement. First and foremost if women want to stand on the same ground, then where are the women in the labour work force such as construction, oil rigs, mining, and other high risk jobs etc.? Answer: they don’t want to work these jobs. The truth hurts but it’s simple, many choices made by men & women are motivated by self-interest. In fact in egalitarian societies such as Sweden, science has shown that there is a greater difference between men & women.
I’m not an expert but I recommend watching some videos on Jordan Peterson regarding gender politics. For many reasons there cannot be true “equality” because it doesn’t exist. It’s the same reason why you cannot have forced equal distribution of wealth, a “prosperous” communist society, or forced gender “equality” in this case because society doesn’t work that way.
For example, men are willing to take more risk hence working high risk jobs for better pay or work overtime, thus there is an “earning gap” and not a “wage gap”. There are many industries and lines of work that women dominate. There are many women who run businesses and earn high income. There are more girls in Universities than boys on average. There isn’t some imaginary “glass ceiling” preventing women from pursuing their life goals. Women even have the right to paid maternity leave, what kind of man has the right to take time off from work for being a “father”? So much for being a “man’s world” as some like to say.
Nice try blaming men but another truth is that women are also a part of our political and socially constructed society. They contribute to establishing the values that many men pursue. For example, if you do not get a good job with a high salary, own property etc. you are not considered marriage material if you fail to provide. Who do you think establishes these standards in men? I’ll give you a hint, it has “men” in it and starts with W.
You’re suggesting that men historically have created these societal standard and are responsible. Have you considered why? Who do you think goes to fight in wars, women? You want to send Mothers and daughters to fight as soldiers? If the men don’t take on this responsibility then who will? Korean men are frustrated because society and individuals as yourself do not acknowledge that men don’t even have a choice in this matter. The least society can do is understand that men have just as many forms of oppression due their gender.
As I said before, stop trying to make this about men vs women. Both suffer & experience various forms of oppression as a function of the state AND individuals of BOTH genders contributing to dysfunction. Modern day 3rd wave feminism is not about “equality” it’s about fighting men out of spite stemming from group collective victimization as with any Marxist movement. To put it simply, 3rd wave feminism isn’t about being on “equal” grounds, it’s about women who want the so called “benefits” of being male while also retaining the privilege of being female.
That is not equality. Men are not disposable beings ready to throw away their lives for selfish politicians, they are not walking gold mines expected to pay for everything, they are human and deserve to take time off from work and be with their family, they are human beings as well.
As I said before, it’s easy to say men have it easy until you actually take notice of the differences between men & women and how oppression exists on both sides, and both genders contribute to these values.
The solution to this is recognizing that both parties suffer from the same problems expressed in different forms. Rather than dividing men & women and having them fight each other, it’s essential to communicate and understand each other and looking at the facts rather than acting out of spite and ego.
@@flocontour9682 “they create”
Why don’t you attack yourself for whatever societal influence/upbringing that creates limits in your own mind.
Or it is just male agency female hypnoagency crap from feminism?
@@BK-mk3vi I agree with you that 3rd wave feminism is toxic for the most part. I mean hell, Gloria f'ing Steinem actually denigrated the young women attending Bernie Sanders rallies (instead of Hillary's), saying they were there because they just wanted to meet boys, ffs. Seeing her say something so sexist like that, because those young women didn't support her chosen candidate, was incredibly disappointing. However, I vehemently disagree with your assertion that the only reason women aren't taking the high risk jobs you cited was simply being that they just don't want them. That's just not true. All of those jobs are historically male dominated and it's intimidating as hell to work in those industries when for the most part, their mere presence simply isn't appreciated. It's much more complicated than simply writing it off as women just don't want those jobs due to them being high risk.
… anyway wtf
"99% of men agree with us"
Of course that would be the case since your content would ultimately support their severely pessimistic views regarding feminism so it is as of course that they would find your content "agreeable".
Typically when you want to prove your argument to be true, the hardest job isn't appealing to people who already agree with you, but it is to persuade the other side on your point of view. And in order to persuade your opponent effectively, attacking them is not recommended, responding to hate through more hate has never and will never equate to peace talks.
WangJu makes public appearances against feminism in a general manner rather than focusing on radical feminism, and is extremely disrespectful to the female identity while doing so. If they were against radical feminism then they should clarify that with an underlined font. By not doing that they are just repeating the same mistakes radical feminists are doing when they say things like "kill all men" and it just goes onto becoming a vicious cycle of hate and oppression.
I only hope that one day WangJu can get more enlightened and start making actual progressive content about men's societal pressure without hating on/mocking the opposite sex.
Other than that, I am more likely to believe their only reason to make this kind of controversial content in particular is to get views and to manipulate young impressionable men.
Men have to server 2 years while women get a free pass
The only makeup you should wear in the military is CAMO! Get it?!? 💪😡
Okay so basically jayz is one of the richest ppl in the world because he has thick eyebrows
Me:cancelling eyebrow wax appointment!
😭😭
As long as women are not required to carry out compulsory military service while unjustifiably enjoying the same rights as men, it is every South Korean man's duty to dodge it. Israel has had conscription for both sexes since 1948. Norway and Sweden, two of the few European countries that still have conscription, extended it to females in the last decade and other countries are discussing doing the same. South Korea must conscript both sexes. Women need to learn that equal rights imply equal duties.
That military youtube guy should REALLY go into voice acting.
A documentary with a title about man..but the actual content is promotion of feminism..wtf
Treating men and women as exact equals is stupid. Men and women have different strengths, mentally and physically. A woman's quality is her emotional maturity/multi tasking, being able to BRING LIFE etc. Men r physically stronger and in most cases more stern than women, this is a fact and why most countries may ask men to join the military as their biological qualities r more equip for the environment of a military. I'm sick and tired of the world trying to act like we r equal we r not. Both enders shine in different ways. it is not black and white. One thing I will agree with is that NEITHER gender is more important than the other. We need both in society and more importantly in a family.
Seems toxic modern feminism has reached Korea also.
I have a feeling regular Korean folks have not been interviewed at all. Some random anti-feminist doesn't the country make. On the military service, IMO, there should be an alternative service such as helping Community, etc... That said, considering what SK faces, i.e. North Korea and China, it doesn't seem feasible to go away from conscription. This is why Sweden, Norway, Israel, Switzerland, etc.. have conscription as they aren't big enough countries to be able to field volunteer army or are facing potential larger enemies. That said, Sweden, Norway and Israel do conscript everyone and folks are able to serve in different roles. Not everyone needs to be a front line fighter.
simple solution conscript everyone but just for one year. 2 years is too long in 2 years my dad built a business and was making profit.
Talking about equality then those feminist should serve in military just like Korean men does. It should be mendatory for women in Korea.
Then there should be lobbying done by the lawmakers in Congress to create such amendment on the conscription laws. If the men truly wanted to include women in the military service, they should have made a n express action to include women through the proper legal processes.
couldn't be more agree than this
There is no real organic desire in Korea to feminize males. This push is a great example of good old fashion top-down Bernaysian style social engineering.
Marketing firms and public relations people use the media and celebrities to associate beauty products and luxury brands with being high status and desirable.
If they can get men to also feel like they need to use beauty products, that is a doubling of the potential consumer base.
If you want to know more, read the wiki for Edward Bernays or better yet, read his books "Propaganda" and "Crystallizing Public Opinion"
the fact that wangja does not have anything better to do actually lmaoo
I don't mean to spread any negativity here but if we want true gender equality then women must also be equally conscripted like Korean men right
Equal rights cannot only apply to office jobs or pay. I agree with you
@@vhoy7899 exactly
Both can also equally not be conscripted. Or if required due to NK, then pay out a considerable sum of money to all males or grant them a definite job placement in the government with high pay.
@@slaiyfershin true but I guess equal conscription is better
So true even the disabled are conscripted in korea why not women
GREAT JOB~! 32:14 was hilarious tho
So... you guys bought up the fact Wangja was protesting because a magazine called all men insects. So what is the deal with that magazine? Is that the norm for feminists over there? To degrade all men? Should people not be angry when they are compared to animals? You guys mention it was disrespectful for Wangja to dress up and act like a woman, yet 5 minutes later Joi Lee dresses up and act like a man. Was that not disrespectful, or was that okay because Joi was a woman and its okay to disrespect men?
I went to uni with Korean students in Melbourne and we are both vastly different people. While Korean men wear light makeup and look almost like butch lesbian I was looking like an 80s homeless pornstar with my mullet and mustache.
What I'm getting from this is that it absolutely sucks that Korea was split into two, creating a fascist, dangerous country in the north that pretty much forces South Korea to conscript and thereby discriminate against men. I'm a feminist but I understand why men in SK would be anti-feminist considering they're the ones forced to go to the military and will have to put their life on hold. In this way, yeah, SK women *do* have more freedom.
Obviously the ideal solution is that everyone can choose to serve in the military -- that would be the true removal of oppression, and make men way less resentful of women. Of course, when you've got a batsh-t crazy government to take care of, then I guess you gotta oppress some of your own population...
The issue with conscripting women is that there's fear of sexual violence in the military. It already happens in militaries around the world, and in Korea to women who chose to enter the army. Sexual violence is not taken seriously anywhere, but the military and South Korea even less so. Try and imagine what would happen if every woman was forced to go into the military. If you read the statistics for even the USA, it will shock you. Then imagine how many victims mandatory female conscription will result in.
The second issue is Korea already has a very low birth rate. Mandatory female conscription for 18 months will only lower that birth rate and increase the age of first pregnancies. There's already a military exemption for men will 3+ children to encourage for births, but it is still a huge issue.
The real solution is to eliminate mandatory conscription or reduce it to 6 months for both genders (and then having female ONLY units, and I mean ONLY, not one single man allowed even higher ranks to avoid sexual assaults, plus more punishments in all military for sexual assaults), allowing for dissenters to do clerical work. Despite the threat of war, realistically, war nowadays won't be fought and won in the same way it would a have in the 1950s because technology has changed.
Or, since you’re a feminist, have women serve as well. Because fEmInIsM right? Because the world isn’t done fluffy ideals in your head, conscription is there to ensure Korea has a decently sized army.
@@qibriti3220 So much blah blah blah when a direct solution to your ideals is to just have female only units, NOT lower the conscription length because it takes TIME to train. Six months won’t get you a well-trained army.
When your nations survival is at stake and youre worried about being oppressed in a 1st world country.
@@stuka80 What do you want me to say? That I should be okay with oppression against South Korean men?
So informative! Answers so many questions I've wanted to ask. Following.
In my opinion, mandatory military service is very strategic for war specially in this time of chaos.
@金城㱐 Well, yes you're right that is also another way to see it
WAR DOESN'T DISCRIMINATE SO ARE YOU WILLING TO FIGHT FOR YOU'RE COUNTRY
@金城㱐 Nah, not really. Some countries few drafts as a civic service. Of course implementing that would be on a delicate scale of practicality and requirements
Obcession with superficiality is a legacy of Japanese colonial times.
I've been afraid of men for a long time. Lately, I've been using K-pop and K-dramas to present my brain with new models of men. It seems to be working, but para-social relationships are only a first step. Like Koreans, American men are nervous. The goalposts are being moved.
Can't you just make some male friends online? It would be more accurate than some distant celebrities you'll never meet and who play a role.
@@therainbowconnection6813 I don't think it's about OP making friends so much as looking at/watching new performative models for masculinity. If OP had a traumatic experience with men in the past, it's understandable to look elsewhere to get a different view. And American masculinity is performatively aggressive whereas stereotypically East Asian men (at least in contemporary society) are seen as put-together - their masculinity is performatively more sophisticated and definitely a lot calmer. And calm is the key takeaway here. OP isn't looking for a man to play a role directly in their life. They're trying to ease in to being around or even considering viewing modes of masculinity in their society by trying to train their brain to be less afraid by easing into it with a less aggressive model. What they choose to do so isn't really anyone's business. People are allowed to like stuff that others may not. :)
And like OP said, para-social relationships - that is relationships that parallel standard social interactions like following bands/singers/actors/tv shows/movies etc, are good ways to test your skills and boundaries - are just a first step, indicating that there's more to come. Best of luck OP!
Your perception of men is just shitty
@@rawaldaii665 That certainly helps.
Well Kpop and Kdramas don’t represent real Korean men. You’re just feeding yourself fluffy lies
This video was all over the place
I'm from Finland and many of the anti-feminist points resonate. We have a mandatory military service only for men, there's a large gap in educational attainments between boys and girls, men live 5 years shorter lives on average, yet still feminism expects us to focus on women's rights. As long as feminists mainly bring out women's issues, I won't be siding with them.
We cant support you if you dont talk about it
@@blupeppers6437 and here we see feminists making excuses. Apparently he talked about it but she pretended he did not.
39:20 "They're so absorbed in their own vested rights, that they never see the difficulty others might be experiencing. Even though it's right in front of their eyes."
How she acts offended at the man dressing up as a woman for humor, and then in the next scene she's doing the exact same thing with another woman 😂
He was not cross-dressing as humor. The 'performance' he gave was not funny at all. His boss claims it was to get people to agree with them so in the 'conversation' they tried to have with the feminists, they could tell the feminists what they were doing that is not right. That is not how one has a conversation.
@@flocontour9682When a man jumps on a car and dances like that while dressed like a woman, they're obviously trying to be funny...
@@TJsaysHey Not everyone who tries is funny. He failed at funny. He was mocking.
@@flocontour9682 she was mocking too
@@flocontour9682 And he was funny. Go cry
Sorry but China banning Flower Boy
CNA forgot to interview the beauty industry, they are the root cause backed by their government
That's one of the previlages woman have in today's scoeity, based on tradition and pricipals. In old days,men went to war and defend the country and familly, women give birth and raise familly.
problem is soceity has changed and feminist movement wants equality when it benefits them. now women persue education and money without having pressure of giving birth and raising familly, but men are still expected to do their traditional duties to their country and familly.
I can definitely feel the tension at the interview part, especially from 32:53 ..
I didn't felt anything, you snowflake.
Perceptions is double edge swords, it can be a beautiful thing and it can be a dangerous thing... We as a society needs to evolve our perception on ourselves... We need to see ourselves as human beings.. this will resolve alot of issues that alot of us arond the world is currently facing... For example.. the perception that were taught to us of men is the protector, the strong one etc.. and of women, the care takers, emotional etc.. these perceptions will divide us more.. but if we look at men and women are just human beings... Both men and women have emotions and can be strong at the same time... This will help us to resolve many things, not only gender equality, but discrimination against racism, LGBTQ communities, etc.... After all, if we actually look closely what the feminist and anti feminist protest for is just equality... They are actually protesting for the same cause ❤
I don't think men behaving like women is an attractive trait. Not in the long run anyway.
Ok old man
Korean men who have served in the mandatory military service should be honored and respected by the defense department and its constituents, regardless of the mockery of korean women. The defense department in partnership with the cheobols could allow former members of the korean military to land successful careers as part of their reward for their service. If I'm a korean man with that kind of respect, I don't need the respect of feminists, since the defense department and chebols gave me a uniform and career.
A really great doc once again!! More people should watch this as I believe it applies not just to SK but also many other developing countries in the world. We are in the first generation of women being educated and earning salaries where they can support themselves and no longer have to rely or compromise on their partners. The gender roles are shifting and like with any change causes friction on all sides. I believe the way forward is not taking sides but rather people listening to each other, respecting opinions, understanding challenges that both genders face, and championing for a more fair, equal, supportive world. Only then can we as a society move forward.
South Korea is a developed country...
there's Jordan Peterson even in North America.
Feminism is not an absolute truth.
And Korean feminism has a strong radical tendency. cause they're a group of losers that started online.
Korean feminism was started by losers who escaped reality and assimilated online. It is not a women's human rights organization with a history like in the West. And now, feminism is losing their name even in west too.
Radical feminism is nothing more than primitive misogyny. Just as there are many young people in North America who support Professor Jordan Peterson.
As a korean I'm so glad i don't live there. The beauty standards are just plain ridiculous and stressful
To Korean Men where domestic abuse is one of the highest, does seeking equality sound like something society shouldn't want? Regarding domestic and sexual abuse,. Korean law enforcement is a joke when it comes to crimes against women. They're so dismissive of this actually being a huge problem that it's mind-boggling.
27:30 "men are excited and enjoy conversation about cursing women" lmao what is this lockerroom talk that is the basis of #MeToo movement.
Though I defo feel that mandatory conscription should be for all genders(conforming & non-conforming), in addition not to have male/female segregated roles in army.
Gender issues runs so so deep in society
In Korea you can divorce a very long time ago and many korean men pay alimony, what nonsense you are talking about?? And on korean men aren't the highest in domestic abuse in The World or in Asia.
Even though korea doesnt top for having the highest rates of domestic abuse, it is still not taken seriously enough.
That isn't nonsense?
@@emilia2411 how do you don't know take it?? Do you live in South korea?? And what about stupid lie what you said about divorce?
yes I've lived in korea.
What stupid lie are you on about? Single Moms are highly discriminated against and it's difficult to get a divorce in Korea for many reasons.
@@emilia2411 i don't talked about single mothers if not marriage and divorce, and what about single fathers.. they don't count??
It's good that they have military service. Real men are made here💪🔥
Religious reason is not a valid excuse to be exempted from the service, what kind of a secular country would favor such religion that they are exempt from mandatory service?
Either disband conscription entirely, or have everyone serve the military. There cannot be a middle ground.
Agreed
There will be a time where religion is illegal and condemned that the government will go to extreme measures to eliminate it because it's a matter of life or death
I find it ironic that the reporter objected to the male youtuber dressing up as a woman and called it disrespectful, but found the Azangman performer dressing up as various tropes of men acceptable, just because she couched her performance with all that BS about her caricatures of men being some form of therapy. I found both to be done with poor taste and with insincere intentions, but the fact that the reporter herself dressed up as a guy and did not find any dissonance with her calling the male TH-camr disrespectful I found somewhat indicative of her own bias.
As a non-Korean, it's pretty clear me that the gender conflict in SKorea is harsher because the gaps between genders are larger and their society being more regulated and structured. Comparing Skorea to other countries is not particularly unhelpful. Women in the West already come from a place of greater equality comparatively. Most Western men also are not required to serve, and for both sexes to move towards a more equitable situation is not as much of a societal shift compared to SKorea. For me, it's not unexpected to see greater resistance to change. But as usual, both sides are intent on blaming and shaming their opponents to further their agenda.
Korea DEFINITELY needs to require women to do two years military service too. Hell, it's not like they are having children so they can't use that as an excuse.....
What happen to Groove Overdose? Did they break up because of compulsory service? I was stationed in South Korea for 6 years they were my favorite k pop group.
I like how Korea has already mostly passed that toxic masculinity standard. Just as much as women could empower, guys equally should really be enabled to wear/use whatever and express their feelings.
But the problem is, a males can be forced to wear makeup too because of the pressure from being rejected by woman's new standard of male beauty.
Uhm the whole point of the documentary was to show that patriarchal ideologies are still a present issue, maybe not in the same way Western countries may face it but South Korea definetly has high expectations for both men and women.
@@johnramirez3247 hmmm thats so sad for yall its a good thing women have never had to go through that in history.... o wait 🫢
There is no such thing as toxic masculinity. You call it that because you aren't masculine.
@@skillbopster you are very dumb and your world view is about 2 inches wide 😂🤏
I am addicted to cna documentaries. They are so good and insightful.
No they are not. They are slanted and exaggerated to make other countries look bad and cover the Sinagpore state's insecurities.