Judge sir ko koi avocate aata h wrong vakalat krta h fir judge ko hi gussa dikha kr chla jaata h..🙄 Yrr judiciary katre me h...we need much more educated and efficient advocates and baki judges to educated people..
@@ManishPatel-qv3gk i m not a lawyer but I have that common sense of how to behave with higher officials or with common people that many lawyers dont have..! I hope this is the best reply u can digest....!
Advocates ke kaam hi argue krna hai it was on judge that is it right wrong But mentioning the back door entry is wrong thing Advocate didn’t use any loose language and all
हमारे देश में कानून नाम की कोई चीज नहीं होती है यहां तो उसकी सुनी जाती है जिसके पास पैसे के साथ साथ पोलिटिकल पावर होती है अगर यकीन नहीं हो तो तो देख लो उन लोगों आपके आसपास जरूर होंगे
Are mental poora video dekh. Jaab. Judge nai usse poocha ye facts kahaan likha hai constitution mai to vo baata hi nahi paara tha baad mai page turn kaarta au kehra tha aap argument meri sun nahi rahe ho judje nai jaab tak yahi nai bataoge kahan lika hai haar baara bolara taap argument sunhi nahero judje chid gaya tha es chutiya political ajenda tha sur kuch nahi Facebook nahi jo kuch bhi baak do evidence prove Dene hote hai court msi.
Matlab deshwasiyo ke saath kuch bhi hota rahe lekin judge is raja jesi shaan me Kami nahi aa jaay. Petitions ko banana he, padhna he, ratna nahi hota he jesa tum chaah rahe ho. Judge thik se sun hi nahi Raha, use sirf apni hi bolni he. Court me to thik se pes aana chahiye desh ke vakilo ke saath. Collegium se chunke aaya he, tabhi esa he.
@@ashutoshgautam3293 when the basis of the petition are wrong then the court is not obligated not waste its time. Law is a very precise endeavour and not an act of estimating something worthless.
@@HC_15819 collegium judge koi court nahi he king nahi he. Log justice ke liye jate he court me, kisi meritless representation less collegium judge ke nakhre aur nakabiyat jhelne nahi. Agar koi judge agar advocate ka argument dhyaan se sunane samjhne ko tyaar nahi he, to wo judge hone ke liye fit nahi he, wo justice ka mazak bana Raha he apmaan kar Raha he. Petition sahi he ya galat ye judge ki manmarzi aur arrogance aur prejudice aur vested interest decide nahi karega. Agar koi pakhandi thug chor uske bade giroh ke saath tumhare ghar mohhalle me ghusa chala aaye Bina tum logo ki permission liye, to tumhari bhawnaye aur manytaye ahat hogi ki nahi, aur agar hogi to kya tumhe explanation Dena chahiye ya un thug pakhandi giroh aur uske samarthko ko explanation Dena chahiye ki kese bina marzi ke kisi ki jagah par ghuse chale aa rahe he, jawab do. Agar tum kisi giroh ke logo ko kisi ke Ghar mohhalle me Bina permission liye ghusne ka adhikar de rahe ho, to yaad rakkho yahi chiz tumhare khilaf bhi istemaal ho sakti he kabhi.
ये सिर्फ, जजो का अपने आप को फेमस करने और यू-टूब के माध्यम से अपनी इनकम का दूसरा रास्ता बनाना है, न्यायालयों में 15 से 20 वर्षों से डेटस पर डेटस देकर केशो की फाईल के ढेर लगते रहते है, इस से न्यायालय का करप्शन झलकता है ... जय हिन्द..... जय भारतवर्ष
Who has made this person a lawyer. No proper reference and understanding of the rule. The honble judge is repeatedly saying this doesn't apply and he is going back n forth. If i were a judge i too would hv got frustrated.
What about the case and duty .not arrogantly but we have a right to argue our case.contempt could be drawn on judges for behaviour .kindly go through the five judges bench decision if Apex court of year 1986.
This law chakra channel has some vested agenda for views ... Got with the tag line of each video....this judge has snubbed the sponsored petitions so in reaction of that specially
What is wrong in this case, judge was very right, he was asking for order number which was supposed to be answered in a way like no. 22,23,etc. The advocate seems not prepared for the case well. Moreover challenging the order of a judge in going on trial is itself a very bad communicational barrier, if a person is not satisfied with an order of a judge, there is a proper procedure which is needed to be followed to challenge the order
Advocates ke kaam hi argue krna hai it was on judge that is it right wrong But mentioning the back door entry is wrong thing Advocate didn’t use any loose language and all
He was listening properly .1.All he is asking he should have filled the form when the advertisement has come out . 2.The Honorable Justice is asking for rules (most probably sections ) which is favorable to the said lawyer's stand . The advocate should have accepted the rejection of the petition and came back with fresh arguments to suit his needs with applicable sections instead of forcing on the same argument .
Suspend this judge.shame on judiciary! Vakil has to fight with judge for justice, as judges are predecided to say go to appeal ..ha ha for his blunders! And cji say judges darate hai! Cji is not aware of ground realities, even after informed close eyes, wash his image by non priority lectures!
What is wrong in this case, judge was very right, he was asking for order number which was supposed to be answered in a way like no. 22,23,etc. The advocate seems not prepared for the case well. Moreover challenging the order of a judge in going on trial is itself a very bad communicational barrier, if a person is not satisfied with an order of a judge, there is a proper procedure which is needed to be followed to challenge the order
Law and Courts are run like dictator , court and judge should be held liable and questioned when they pass wrong judgment. Person life is more important then illogical judiciary
Jab vakil ki baat thik se nahi suni jaa rahi, judge ko argument ko interupt karna he yaa baat ko thik se dhyaan se sune Bina hi bich me apni hi baat karni he. To ese hi chidd nikalti he. Court me log justice ke liye aate he collegium judge ki manmaani aur uski raja ki tarah izzat ki demand ko Puri karne nahi aate he. Inn collegium judges ko galatfehmi ho gayi he ki wo khud hi court ya justice ya Raja he. Collegium judges ke paas na merit hota he aur na representation, log unpar kyu bharosa kare.
@@neerajanano first of all, judge sud let advocate present his argument properly, judge sud ask question in his own time, he is not a king that only he sud be given time. How cud judge keep asking questions without listening advocate properly, it seems he only want to interupt, and say only wat he already decided. It's not the home of judge, it's court of justice. Judges sud be patient enough to properly listen and understand arguments, then only he sud ask any questions, not in-between.
@@vishalpatidar9018 jab sunega hi nahi, to kese pata chalega ki fact he ki faltu. Ye collegium wale judges he, naa Inka koi merit ka basis he aur naa representation ka. Fir bhi raja jesi shaan chahiye. Advocate ko pahle uska argument rakhne to de, use sun samajh, fir kar koi questions. Advocate waha justice ke liye aaya he, naa ki judges ki rajaao jesi gulami karne aur naa hi kewal judges ke jawab dete rahne ke liye. Jo judges jara bhi bina interference ke sunane samjhne ko tyaar nahi he, wo justice ka apman karte he.
@@vishalpatidar9018 Abey bewkoofo jesi baate mat kar. High court aur supreme court me judges Bina kisi kaabiliyat ke hi bante he, kewal collegium ke bhrastachar ke chalte. In collegium judges se behtar to clerk hote he. Reservation walo ka kuch to adhaar hota he, tumhare collegium judge ka to koi adhaar hi nahi he. Aur ye uski nakabiyat idhar sabit bhi kar Raha he. Jab respected advocate ka argument thodi bhi der sunane samjhne ko tyaar nahi he, to kaahe ka justice ye to joke he. Pahle wakil ko uska argument rakhne de, fir Jo baat kahni Jo question karna he karle. Wakil kewal uska jawab dene ke liye nahi aaya. Baat ko thik se sune Bina hi decide kar liya, isko prejudice kahte he, justice nahi. Wese bhi judge ka questions faltu he. Arey tere Ghar mohhalle me koi pakhandi thug chor giroh uske pure giroh ke saath ghus aaye aur dera jamale kabja kar le Bina tum logo ki permission ke, to authorisation laane aur explanation dene ki jimedaari uss pakhandi thug giroh ki he, tere paksh me bolne wale wakil ki nahi. Ya to baat iss judge ko samajh nahi aa rahi, ya ye jaanbujhkar argument ko interupt karke baat ko badalna chahta he kisi nizi fayde ki soch kar.
Judge sir ko koi avocate aata h wrong vakalat krta h fir judge ko hi gussa dikha kr chla jaata h..🙄 Yrr judiciary katre me h...we need much more educated and efficient advocates and baki judges are educated but they too most of the times become angry but here inthis video the judge looks calm but advocates are taking wrong use of his calmness😅..
I see how politics has been injected into some people mind as they are not seeing how this lawyer is saying illogical things but then also they are blaming judge and yes judge shouldn't use the word back dorr entry but yeah his doubt will not be clear by the lawyer .... But these peoples who are commenting are the ones who will only see things from one way they could never get to a judge place in their life.
This Judge is repeatedly....EVOKING BAD BEHAVIOR from the lawyers....Time to EVALUATE his performance as a judge..... and necessary steps taken if needed like demotion etc...
No. The honorable judge could've initiated contempt of court proceedings or cancel the lawyer's license via Bar Council... he left him with a plain warning. It's visible the judge gives sufficient opportunities to lawyers.
Jason Rajasthan banswada jila ke cartoon tahsil bumrah se bol rahe hamari do khud ki jameen ki dukaan se dosti kar di Pathak jameen ki aur police ne galat mastication kiye please hamari help
Ye Agrwal judge ye Sarna Jati se belong krta hai. Isiliye ye ST ,SC aur OBC against hi kam karta hai. sare sabut hone ke bavjud bhi judge ne ST ke logo ko nyay nahi diya.
Judge sir ko koi avocate aata h wrong vakalat krta h fir judge ko hi gussa dikha kr chla jaata h..🙄
Yrr judiciary katre me h...we need much more educated and efficient advocates and baki judges to educated people..
Kindly find out the reason your self.
Bhai judge bhi aaj kal ke bewkoof hai.
Aajkal bahut kam selfmade hote hai baki sab apas me hi help krke bante hai
(If you know you know)
Maintenable
r u a LAWYER
@@ManishPatel-qv3gk i m not a lawyer but I have that common sense of how to behave with higher officials or with common people that many lawyers dont have..!
I hope this is the best reply u can digest....!
Judges should listen peacefully. Pre determined😂
Wonderful and fearful also. We must die but should not step in the court because going in the court is more painful than death.
Aisa lagta hai, ki, ab ham marne jaa rahe hai court me
Debate and discussion should be based on facts and rules, not on the basis of opinion of own, party, sponsered or misplaced facts and documents.
Only on law basis in high court and supreme court.
Advocates ke kaam hi argue krna hai it was on judge that is it right wrong
But mentioning the back door entry is wrong thing
Advocate didn’t use any loose language and all
Alternate title - "Wromg argument advanced, Judge confronts advocate."
I love the way the judge dictates his verdict. So astute.
हमारे देश में कानून नाम की कोई चीज नहीं होती है यहां तो उसकी सुनी जाती है जिसके पास पैसे के साथ साथ पोलिटिकल पावर होती है अगर यकीन नहीं हो तो तो देख लो उन लोगों आपके आसपास जरूर होंगे
Par agar - ek ne himmat ki - with knowledge and Group -He can give a Flight- I believe in Bhagat Singh than
Aapne ekdm sahi bole ....ye judge sahab ...apne man se karte manmani....baat sunane ko taiyar hi nhi honge jaise baat karte hai
Argument is important with the ultimate goal of bringing facts ... Judge must also give some attention of the lawyer's request .
Are mental poora video dekh. Jaab. Judge nai usse poocha ye facts kahaan likha hai constitution mai to vo baata hi nahi paara tha baad mai page turn kaarta au kehra tha aap argument meri sun nahi rahe ho judje nai jaab tak yahi nai bataoge kahan lika hai haar baara bolara taap argument sunhi nahero judje chid gaya tha es chutiya political ajenda tha sur kuch nahi Facebook nahi jo kuch bhi baak do evidence prove Dene hote hai court msi.
Ye judge ST wale case men thik se sunta hi nhi hai boltarehta hai.
Laughable and sick behaviour of Advocate, Like a child he's accusing judge and blabbering anything but not accepting his own fault
Advocate should prepare the case thoroughly then come to court .aintain cout decorum ..
Matlab deshwasiyo ke saath kuch bhi hota rahe lekin judge is raja jesi shaan me Kami nahi aa jaay. Petitions ko banana he, padhna he, ratna nahi hota he jesa tum chaah rahe ho.
Judge thik se sun hi nahi Raha, use sirf apni hi bolni he. Court me to thik se pes aana chahiye desh ke vakilo ke saath.
Collegium se chunke aaya he, tabhi esa he.
@@ashutoshgautam3293 when the basis of the petition are wrong then the court is not obligated not waste its time. Law is a very precise endeavour and not an act of estimating something worthless.
@@HC_15819 collegium judge koi court nahi he king nahi he. Log justice ke liye jate he court me, kisi meritless representation less collegium judge ke nakhre aur nakabiyat jhelne nahi.
Agar koi judge agar advocate ka argument dhyaan se sunane samjhne ko tyaar nahi he, to wo judge hone ke liye fit nahi he, wo justice ka mazak bana Raha he apmaan kar Raha he. Petition sahi he ya galat ye judge ki manmarzi aur arrogance aur prejudice aur vested interest decide nahi karega.
Agar koi pakhandi thug chor uske bade giroh ke saath tumhare ghar mohhalle me ghusa chala aaye Bina tum logo ki permission liye, to tumhari bhawnaye aur manytaye ahat hogi ki nahi, aur agar hogi to kya tumhe explanation Dena chahiye ya un thug pakhandi giroh aur uske samarthko ko explanation Dena chahiye ki kese bina marzi ke kisi ki jagah par ghuse chale aa rahe he, jawab do.
Agar tum kisi giroh ke logo ko kisi ke Ghar mohhalle me Bina permission liye ghusne ka adhikar de rahe ho, to yaad rakkho yahi chiz tumhare khilaf bhi istemaal ho sakti he kabhi.
Just because judge is non partial and not sold out to anti nationals, they are trying to irritating him and insulting him.
Thousands of "SIR"
This judge is very egoistic. Arrogant
Ram Ram Jai Sai Ram Ji
Not good for we people of india
Lawyer should use respectfully word towards chairs
Thanks
Court does not want to decide anything. They want case supposed to be continued
ये सिर्फ, जजो का अपने आप को फेमस करने और यू-टूब के माध्यम से अपनी इनकम का दूसरा रास्ता बनाना है, न्यायालयों में 15 से 20 वर्षों से डेटस पर डेटस देकर केशो की फाईल के ढेर लगते रहते है, इस से न्यायालय का करप्शन झलकता है ... जय हिन्द..... जय भारतवर्ष
Very ARROGANT AND RUDE JUDGE
These lawyers talk like truck drivers 😂
Who has made this person a lawyer. No proper reference and understanding of the rule. The honble judge is repeatedly saying this doesn't apply and he is going back n forth. If i were a judge i too would hv got frustrated.
Our. India. Sambidhan. Top
Lawyers/Advocates should never dictate terms with a judge however provocative the situation could be.
What about the case and duty .not arrogantly but we have a right to argue our case.contempt could be drawn on judges for behaviour .kindly go through the five judges bench decision if Apex court of year 1986.
Of
extremely wrong opinion
Judges are not gods. Vo bhi hagte he
Why not, judges can't do or say anything
Bhagwan courts se bach aaye
This law chakra channel has some vested agenda for views ... Got with the tag line of each video....this judge has snubbed the sponsored petitions so in reaction of that specially
"Vivek" - the judge has it.
The lawyer is belligerent, illogical. Disbar.
Dadagiri of a judge ! Nothing else ! I have lost my faith from slow and biased, corrupt judiciary of this nation long ago
What is wrong in this case, judge was very right, he was asking for order number which was supposed to be answered in a way like no. 22,23,etc. The advocate seems not prepared for the case well. Moreover challenging the order of a judge in going on trial is itself a very bad communicational barrier, if a person is not satisfied with an order of a judge, there is a proper procedure which is needed to be followed to challenge the order
Advocate is like meri toffee Munna nay le li hai......muje toffee chahiye
Future CJI
Indeed
We all hope
@@LawChakra bhai sahi mein possibility hai?!! Please reply krna
@@friendlyvimana depend krta he ki HC में कितना समय हो गया 10 साल HC का अनुभव होना चाहिए और उम्र 65 से km
Ghanta
Advocates ke kaam hi argue krna hai it was on judge that is it right wrong
But mentioning the back door entry is wrong thing
Advocate didn’t use any loose language and all
What is a back door entry
Uneducated. Lawyers don't argue with the judge. IQ lower than freezing temperature
Our. India. All's. HC. Design. Maker. Authority
Es judge ko nikal dena chahiye. bahot hi nalayak aur srkar ka pitthu hai ye judge.
Judge seems to be very arrogant and he doesn't listen properly to the advocates...............
He was listening properly .1.All he is asking he should have filled the form when the advertisement has come out .
2.The Honorable Justice is asking for rules (most probably sections ) which is favorable to the said lawyer's stand .
The advocate should have accepted the rejection of the petition and came back with fresh arguments to suit his needs with applicable sections instead of forcing on the same argument .
Sir. Top. India. Sambidhan
Design. Authority.
All's. India. Court.
Judge
Law. And. Irdere
True desigen
Maker
.India. all's. Courts
Suspend this judge.shame on judiciary! Vakil has to fight with judge for justice, as judges are predecided to say go to appeal ..ha ha for his blunders! And cji say judges darate hai! Cji is not aware of ground realities, even after informed close eyes, wash his image by non priority lectures!
What is wrong in this case, judge was very right, he was asking for order number which was supposed to be answered in a way like no. 22,23,etc. The advocate seems not prepared for the case well. Moreover challenging the order of a judge in going on trial is itself a very bad communicational barrier, if a person is not satisfied with an order of a judge, there is a proper procedure which is needed to be followed to challenge the order
Me bhi supreme court ka judge bnunga jaldi hi
Ye jaj khud hi itna bolta hai ki kisi ko bolnne ka mauka hi nahi milta hai
जज साहब खतरा मोल नहीं लेते,फिर भी वोकिल साहब मानते ही नहीं
Top. Our. India. Law. And. Order
Judge ke ek wrong decision ne hmari life barbaad ki
This conversation is like hidrolic press too much pressure 🤕😬😬
true there is no justice in court
Judge sahab ko salaam ❤️
Clear cut cult prayer must be as a prayer....any overflow may thrust the outcome....
all's. India. A Indian. Politicians. Money maker. Politician.
Our. India. Sambidhan. Top. True
That's by be have suprime court😊
Judiciary khatre me hai lawyer bhi judge ke jhot ki patti khol nhi sakta
Judge chor sab sarkar ke sath milkar old pension le rahe 😂😂
He's an advocate not lawyer 😂😂😂
Ye nispakch nhi nayay karte ...ye bhedbhaw karte ...baat rakhne ko taiyar hi nhi hote
Our. Indian. Court. Respect.
.responsibility
Our. Court. Strongly. Responsibilities.
But
Pm. Modi. Politician. Harassed. My. India
Law. And. Order
Sir is a irritating word for judge...
Even magistrates expecting MY LORD from lawyers/ Advocates😂😂😂
saare fake degree vakil bhare pde hai
@Unwonted Contriver reservation ke chode hai saare vakil😂😂😂😂 aur Gyan pelne aate hai😂😂😂
The way lawyer frustrated and has not given which rule lagaya. Code of conduct ka kmi hai lawyer me..
Law and Courts are run like dictator , court and judge should be held liable and questioned when they pass wrong judgment.
Person life is more important then illogical judiciary
Khahase athe are khaha padke athe ase advocate...argue means in properway not like this
Jab vakil ki baat thik se nahi suni jaa rahi, judge ko argument ko interupt karna he yaa baat ko thik se dhyaan se sune Bina hi bich me apni hi baat karni he. To ese hi chidd nikalti he.
Court me log justice ke liye aate he collegium judge ki manmaani aur uski raja ki tarah izzat ki demand ko Puri karne nahi aate he.
Inn collegium judges ko galatfehmi ho gayi he ki wo khud hi court ya justice ya Raja he.
Collegium judges ke paas na merit hota he aur na representation, log unpar kyu bharosa kare.
@@ashutoshgautam3293 but he is not conveying in proper way it seems..n rudely answering...it is not the question of teekse nahi sunrahahi..etc
@@neerajanano first of all, judge sud let advocate present his argument properly, judge sud ask question in his own time, he is not a king that only he sud be given time. How cud judge keep asking questions without listening advocate properly, it seems he only want to interupt, and say only wat he already decided. It's not the home of judge, it's court of justice. Judges sud be patient enough to properly listen and understand arguments, then only he sud ask any questions, not in-between.
न्यायाधीश रंगदारी कर रहे है
What's is the name is this Judge?
@Unwonted Contriver thankyou
This judge is way too arrogant
Judges sunte nh h ache se
Judge he vo itna faltu nahi h jo bakwas sunega facts chahiye unko jo is vakil ke pass nahi h
The lawyer is Illiterate. He hasn't read the petition. Came to the court like its playground.
@@vishalpatidar9018 jab sunega hi nahi, to kese pata chalega ki fact he ki faltu.
Ye collegium wale judges he, naa Inka koi merit ka basis he aur naa representation ka. Fir bhi raja jesi shaan chahiye.
Advocate ko pahle uska argument rakhne to de, use sun samajh, fir kar koi questions. Advocate waha justice ke liye aaya he, naa ki judges ki rajaao jesi gulami karne aur naa hi kewal judges ke jawab dete rahne ke liye.
Jo judges jara bhi bina interference ke sunane samjhne ko tyaar nahi he, wo justice ka apman karte he.
@@ashutoshgautam3293 high court he lala waha ase he kisi ko judge nahi banaya jaata...
Thoda research karlo reservation se nahi aati har cheez...🤧
@@vishalpatidar9018 Abey bewkoofo jesi baate mat kar. High court aur supreme court me judges Bina kisi kaabiliyat ke hi bante he, kewal collegium ke bhrastachar ke chalte. In collegium judges se behtar to clerk hote he.
Reservation walo ka kuch to adhaar hota he, tumhare collegium judge ka to koi adhaar hi nahi he. Aur ye uski nakabiyat idhar sabit bhi kar Raha he. Jab respected advocate ka argument thodi bhi der sunane samjhne ko tyaar nahi he, to kaahe ka justice ye to joke he. Pahle wakil ko uska argument rakhne de, fir Jo baat kahni Jo question karna he karle. Wakil kewal uska jawab dene ke liye nahi aaya. Baat ko thik se sune Bina hi decide kar liya, isko prejudice kahte he, justice nahi.
Wese bhi judge ka questions faltu he. Arey tere Ghar mohhalle me koi pakhandi thug chor giroh uske pure giroh ke saath ghus aaye aur dera jamale kabja kar le Bina tum logo ki permission ke, to authorisation laane aur explanation dene ki jimedaari uss pakhandi thug giroh ki he, tere paksh me bolne wale wakil ki nahi. Ya to baat iss judge ko samajh nahi aa rahi, ya ye jaanbujhkar argument ko interupt karke baat ko badalna chahta he kisi nizi fayde ki soch kar.
Judge sir ko koi avocate aata h wrong vakalat krta h fir judge ko hi gussa dikha kr chla jaata h..🙄
Yrr judiciary katre me h...we need much more educated and efficient advocates and baki judges are educated but they too most of the times become angry but here inthis video the judge looks calm but advocates are taking wrong use of his calmness😅..
Good advocate
how arrogant this high court judge is ? I have watched many of his sessions but he's behavior is same in every case.
Kya bat hai.spne bat samjhi hai.
Isiliye vakil naraj hai.
लगता है एडवोकेट साहब घर से लड़ कर आए
Video ka title galat h...kabhi court ka mu dekha h?
I see how politics has been injected into some people mind as they are not seeing how this lawyer is saying illogical things but then also they are blaming judge and yes judge shouldn't use the word back dorr entry but yeah his doubt will not be clear by the lawyer .... But these peoples who are commenting are the ones who will only see things from one way they could never get to a judge place in their life.
Plutocracy of Highly Paid
This Judge is repeatedly....EVOKING BAD BEHAVIOR from the lawyers....Time to EVALUATE his performance as a judge..... and necessary steps taken if needed like demotion etc...
No. The honorable judge could've initiated contempt of court proceedings or cancel the lawyer's license via Bar Council... he left him with a plain warning.
It's visible the judge gives sufficient opportunities to lawyers.
might be some strategy of this channel Law Chakra
Jason Rajasthan banswada jila ke cartoon tahsil bumrah se bol rahe hamari do khud ki jameen ki dukaan se dosti kar di Pathak jameen ki aur police ne galat mastication kiye please hamari help
Poor advocate
Ye wakil bakwas hain
India. Sambidhan. Authorities. To. Indian. Court. Last. Dedugen. Authority. Of. India
Ye advocates homework karke ate nei🙄
Case before this judge is always problematic. Who is right here in this court hall. CJI pls note. Give a patience hearing no matter what ?
worst judge ever!
Advocate got a point
Biased!
Ye Agrwal judge ye Sarna Jati se belong krta hai. Isiliye ye ST ,SC aur OBC against hi kam karta hai. sare sabut hone ke bavjud bhi judge ne ST ke logo ko nyay nahi diya.
Is desh me sab bewakoof hai judge ho lawer ho police ho politician ho
Aap bhi unhi main se ho. Iss hisab se aap bhi bewkuff hi consider kiye jaoge
Same logic apply to you :v
Halo
I am half tempted to report this channel for misleading and check do not show videos from this channel.
What is misleading about this video.
Good advocate
Good advocate