@gekksvide0 It's actually "These men..." Native speaker here. For whatever reason it's an irregular plural. No big deal though brothers. God bless you both!
Dale's problem with the appearance to St. Paul isn't with history; we have the historical event documented in the Book of Acts. His problem is with philosophy. His philosophical presupposition prevents him from accepting the historical data embedded in Acts and the rest of the NT. Mike was right that the event in Acts wasn't done in isolation. It's a piece of the bigger puzzle of cumulative resurrection evidence in the NT. Explanatory power comes into play here.
Dirty move. Licona puts himself on the same standing as Dale by giving both ‘PhD’. Well Mike you’re not on his level. Dale is a PROFESSOR at a university called Princeton. How are you possibly on his level?
Get lost. Mike is a legitimate scholar. His book on differences in the Gospels actually makes advances in real scholarship. He’s also an apologist but he’s a scholar as well.
@@EchoP7596 Dale Allison is in a different league altogether, he’s acknowledged and recognised as an authority in his own right on gospel study. You don’t know your scholars very well. Heavyweight vs Flyweight.
@@DC-wp6oj I’m well aware about Dale Allison. I have some of his works. I am just saying that Mike is a real scholar. Just because you don’t like his beliefs doesn’t mean he is not.
A wonderful conversation thank you
Mike, love that movie too and that quote is so true. I really want to get it right.
Fascinating, thanks.
These man's are cracks, glory of God.
@gekksvide0 thanks for the correction
@gekksvide0 It's actually "These men..." Native speaker here. For whatever reason it's an irregular plural. No big deal though brothers. God bless you both!
Speaking of cracks, this comment thread cracks me up.
Where can we find more information about Marian apparitions (particularly the one mentioned in the video that occurred in Fatima, Portugal)?
@42:00 why didn’t Mike tell us the title of the “occult” book ?
What an incredible sharp honest intellect Mike has...really inspiring
Dale's problem with the appearance to St. Paul isn't with history; we have the historical event documented in the Book of Acts. His problem is with philosophy. His philosophical presupposition prevents him from accepting the historical data embedded in Acts and the rest of the NT. Mike was right that the event in Acts wasn't done in isolation. It's a piece of the bigger puzzle of cumulative resurrection evidence in the NT. Explanatory power comes into play here.
Nope. His only problem is that he is not a sunday school teacher but an honest historian.
I love Mick licona
First comment
"I think all those things together make a really good case". Problem is, gentleman, many anecdotes do not add up to a fact.
Except when anecdotes pile up like that, it becomes evidence.
@@zephyr-117sdropzone8 What's piling up here has to be picked up with a shovel in the back yard on saturdays
@@99cachorro Prove it.
Dirty move. Licona puts himself on the same standing as Dale by giving both ‘PhD’. Well Mike you’re not on his level. Dale is a PROFESSOR at a university called Princeton. How are you possibly on his level?
Mike got his from an online correspondence college for less than $5,000
Get lost. Mike is a legitimate scholar. His book on differences in the Gospels actually makes advances in real scholarship. He’s also an apologist but he’s a scholar as well.
@@EchoP7596 Dale Allison is in a different league altogether, he’s acknowledged and recognised as an authority in his own right on gospel study. You don’t know your scholars very well. Heavyweight vs Flyweight.
@@DC-wp6oj I’m well aware about Dale Allison. I have some of his works. I am just saying that Mike is a real scholar. Just because you don’t like his beliefs doesn’t mean he is not.
@@EchoP7596 Mike is an apologist thats fair to defend his faith. To continue to argue in the face of the evidence lessens his prestige as a scholar.