Podcast: George Friedman's Mailbag

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 70

  • @rybojames4111
    @rybojames4111 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    What a great surprise. Very pleased to hear Dr. Friedman will be joining regularly.

  • @ironstarAcles
    @ironstarAcles 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I had the plesure of shaking hands with this unique man. Behind his smile a briliant mind and humble atitude .

  • @flashfuture27
    @flashfuture27 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for your work gentlemen!

  • @pwjackson888
    @pwjackson888 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You leave me with no choice but to add another year to my subscription!!

  • @augurcybernaut4785
    @augurcybernaut4785 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thomas Friedman, Leif Wernar, Richard Werner, Michael Hudson, Yannis Varfikaus, Robert Thomas, Adam Curtis, Caspian Report

  • @birminghamline
    @birminghamline 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've not long come across George, and so far I like what he has to say

  • @trankt54155
    @trankt54155 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would like to hear George's thoughts on Dr. Michael Pillsbury's book about China's strategy to surpass the US to rule the world.

  • @raoulikon6679
    @raoulikon6679 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great interview, thanks!

  • @mfisher1952
    @mfisher1952 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've been a fan for decades.

  • @unknownsoldier452
    @unknownsoldier452 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice.

  • @Joker-yw9hl
    @Joker-yw9hl 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the Friedman

  • @awuma
    @awuma 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    4:07 By "microchip", I presume George means "microprocessor", the Intel 4004 appearing in 1971. "Microcircuits", a.k.a. integrated circuits, appeared about 12 years earlier, the first application (IIRC) being for the Minuteman ICBM, and "chip" certainly includes logic circuits, microprocessors, and sensors such as CCDs, as well as nowadays a myriad of other integrated circuits in a single housing. The third generation of computers, headed by the IBM System/360 circa 1964, was defined by its use of integrated circuits on printed circuit boards, while "microcomputers" came along in the 1970's, with the CPU itself being an integrated chip, a "microprocessor" such as the Intel 4004. The power of microprocessors rapidly increased, with companies like DEC and Motorola leading the charge and producing whole families of CPUs and ancillary chips. Intel did not really catch up until it introduced the 80386/387 in 1985. As is often the case, the most elegant design did not win, and the IBM PC was a messy combination of different architectures. The PC won because it was IBM, and uncharacteristically, IBM made the PC architecture open.

  • @spacecanuk8316
    @spacecanuk8316 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Read us Canadians like a book, always a treat to hear from the man himself. I'm kinda curious what Dr. Friedman's opinion on what the impact of human development of space both in orbit and beyond might have geopoltically(in case anyone from GPF is reading). Asteroid mining could become a thing this century and possibly provide an abundance of rare and usefulminerals while satelites are vital modern infrastructure with a host of upcoming problems and potential that people seem to ignore. Also what would the impact be if something like fusion power is cracked? It's possibly closer than ya think, perpetually 12 instead of 20 years away this time ;)

  • @inter3684
    @inter3684 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Trump is Brilliant, He's Honest, and he does things for American national interest, not for other's national interest.

    • @donaldclifford5763
      @donaldclifford5763 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      So what does this say about his detractors?

    • @Fusselwurmify
      @Fusselwurmify 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He's a senile bully who is making stuff up as he speaks.
      Doing some things that are in the American national interest foreign policy wise doesnt automatically make him brilliant or honest.

    • @inter3684
      @inter3684 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Fusselwurmify Honesty is worth everything in this day and age

  • @theknight4317
    @theknight4317 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Actually, it is interesting to see, how the GPF gets things right. Especially with George Friedman, mostly right in "the Next Decade" and until now, is mostly right in "the Next 100 Years", with the GPF predicting the U.S Syria withdrawal, for example.
    Good job! :D

  • @ssm59
    @ssm59 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Trump is using hardcore in the dirt negotiating techniques, not the tea and crumpets version used by aristocrats. This panics the political class and consequently they given him more than if he negotiated nicely

  • @eikantas
    @eikantas 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Poland-Lithuania, not solely Poland. (divisions and invasion of Moscow).

  • @jruig
    @jruig 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Any chance of a podcast discussion about the potential for a China Russia war. Please.

    • @sakiusad
      @sakiusad 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sino-Indian war is more plausible

    • @jruig
      @jruig 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      sakiusad why? Russia and China has actually been at war innumerable times.

  • @Frank_Ammerlaan
    @Frank_Ammerlaan 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Trump says hateful things but in the end is a reasonable, calm and really smart man. I disagree with many of his policies but dont ever underestimate him! Dont look at his quack but at his wiggle. Look at his actions. Not his demagogue talk. He may get re-elected!

  • @pyrat3538
    @pyrat3538 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    why friedman is always wrong on china?

  • @mac94312
    @mac94312 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    This would be much more enjoyable with video!

  • @KhalerJex
    @KhalerJex 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Landing on the moon in the *far side* is not in the 1960's mr friedman. Is Like Saying that the Spaniards conquering the Canaries are something of the I century BCE, just because the king of mauritania did it at that time.
    George, sometimes you disapoint me.

  • @fredmonroe656
    @fredmonroe656 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Platitudes and back-slapping do not an insight give, though they do elicit praise from those who hear their biases repeated.

  • @Bmthbabe23
    @Bmthbabe23 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why does he lie?

    • @donaldclifford5763
      @donaldclifford5763 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe the problem is with your comprehension. Be specific, and we can see.

  • @Porkeater2610957
    @Porkeater2610957 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why do I get the impression that Friedman is the epitome of wishful thinking.

    • @RLModerndayJoseph
      @RLModerndayJoseph 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's what I said. Especially in this video when he sai columbia has an opprotunity to capitalize on China's oil cusumption. First thing came to mind was he really saying if columbia follows america and invade venuezela. That's the opprotunity he really talking about.

    • @billkramer2994
      @billkramer2994 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Friedman is "Factful" thinking that guys like you who don't "Get it" want to label otherwise to deflect fr yr ignorance!

    • @Porkeater2610957
      @Porkeater2610957 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@billkramer2994 Friedman said in 2014, that Russia will "go bankrupt and fall apart in two years".It's 2020, Russia is stronger than ever before and it's sending medical aid to the US which is in crisis.
      He said that China will fall apart internally. China is stable as never before.

    • @billkramer2994
      @billkramer2994 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Porkeater2610957 Dead wrong on both parts! Russ needs $75/bar oil to bal their budget! It's now in mid $20's! Russ sends $ to outlying areas, because their broke, these outlying areas aren't getting their $! How Sov. Un fell! Russ is a 1 trick econ - oil! With US fracking abil and low world demand, they are falling apart internally fr same reason!
      As Friedman said, China is in econ decendancy as they are following what happened to Japan. Any country that lives off exports is at mercy of their cudtomers! Riots in Hong Kong, coverup of virus! Companies are relocating to V/nam, indonesia etc.
      Due yr homework on what's REALLY happening! Not just spewing BS about Friedman whose geopolitical views are sought by every country just because yr too lazy to learn the truths he states!

    • @Porkeater2610957
      @Porkeater2610957 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@billkramer2994 LOL

  • @RLModerndayJoseph
    @RLModerndayJoseph 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ole George contradicts himself by saying america refusing to admit it lose the war and leaves few troops in a country to be attacked without winning anything, but then suggest the isn't multi-polar simply bc america can position it's forces everywhere without winning anything. Russia stopped america in syria and ukraine despite america's presence and despite Nato, europe still relies on Russia for oil and gas. Not to mention russia has the millitary power to destroy both europe and american. China controls the S.C. sea despite america's presence and has 10 of the top 21 companies in the world. I'd say that's a multiploar world.

    • @luigimanzoni2705
      @luigimanzoni2705 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry, Russia didn't stop the US in Syria. Syria came about because of Obama and Hillary. When Trump won he had already made the decision to end the caliphate and get out as quickly as possible. Few mis steps in the beginning u til he realized he was getting bad advice from holdovers from the prior admin. Then focused US intent on IS with Russia and defeated them. Russia backed off after Trump allowed the US military to kick the crap out of a Russian effort to attack and inflict casualties on a small contingent of US soldiers along with Kurd allies.
      Very interesting video with radio transmissions documenting it all.
      Let's just say that The Russians understood they weren't dealing with Obama at that point and any Russian effort to pull that kind of crap again would be met the same way with maximum force.
      Yes, the mess in Syria was started by the US under the administration of Obama, Hillary, and the other marxist/progressive criminals, not Trump who is doing his best to try a d root out the Clibton/Obama mafia embedded in the US government and intelligence community.