Adobe Speaks Out About DaVinci Resolve
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ก.ย. 2024
- "DaVinci Resolve Is Now So Good It’s Impossible for Competitors to Ignore" Do you agree?
read the article from @PetaPixel here! petapixel.com/...
---
👉20+ FREE DAVINCI RESOLVE PRESETS Here! stirlingsupply...
Sneak peeks and more on Twitter! / patrickstirling
🎵Check out Audiio for High Quality Music and Sound effects! audiio.com/pat... and use code PatrickS at checkout for 70% off Audiio Pro! 🎵
Like my website? Build your own for free to sell your products and run custom memberships with Fourthwall! link.fourthwal...
Shop for the Best DaVinci Resolve Plugins at MotionVFX!
mvfx.co/Patric...
Let's not forget too that one of the main reasons people are switching and turning away from Adobe is due to their licensing. Big corporations like this get too big for their boots, forget their customers and think they can do what they like. No. Resolve all the way for me, love the software and the licensing model
Adobe needs to be humbled by their customers walking away.
I mean they can. Adobe is not only caged in the colorgrading or editing arena. They have a vast market share and softwares plus their ai models are coming up as well. They will need have that going on which is fair. Still pr and nuke is the industry standard on edits and ae is mainatream as of facts. Davinci is great when it comes to colorgrades hands down.
Blackmagic and Affinity have done amazing work in breaking the stranglehold Adobe held, not through legal maneuvering or predatory practices, but just technical excellence and customer engagement. Blender, Resolve, and Affinity are also amazing tools for small timers on a budget.
@@BillGarrett Insuggest they team up and take it further than Adobe ever did. Feels like Premiere and After
Effects are still from different competing companies, sometimes.
Nice to see this style of video from you dude!! 👌
I feel really good about it! Definitely would love to cycle more of this kinda stuff in
Agree with Mr Alex; interesting point of view.
Petition to take that shirt off and put on a shirt with nodes on it.
🔸️Media in➡️
🔸️Man named Patrick ➡️
🔸️Shirt ➡️
🔸️Blue
🔸️Design ➡️
🔸️Media Out
As a professional editor for 30 years I can safely say that Adobes Premier wasn't in the picture before Apple shot itself in the foot with Final Cut X around 2012 or so. It was ALWAYS Avid Media Composer, and still is and Final Cut 7. Premier up to that point was a side kick for graphic designers. And Adobe has every reason to be afraid of Resolve for the same reason it cant compete with Avid. Both companies can build hardware. Adobe has just been lucky with a very bad and unstable product.
Right! Premiere was at the same level as like Media 100. I want to say that some corporate media departments would use it because they knew of Photoshop and they happen to have Premiere also.
FCP was in competition with Avid, had the best editor and people were excited about its *professional* future. You had hardware developers like Digital Voodoo and FCP on ICE, etc. Then FCPX happened :(
Now, I feel like Grant (who I remember from the forums when he was just an editor) really approaches Davinci like an experienced professional editor and has added things that a professional editor would use. It even has many of the old FCP keyboard shortcuts (which I even used in Premiere).
I feel like DaVinci is what I was looking for as the future of FCP.
Strongly agree with this. For decades, Avid Media Composer was the real tool that every professional editor used for proper media management, extremely flexible interoperability, robust multi user collaboration with shared storage, and maybe most overlooked - an extremely sophisticated asymmetrical trimming system that remained unmatched for many, many years. FCP gained traction in the videographer market and was poised to make a meaningful encroachment into the professional market, only to faceplant with FCPX. Adobe cleverly capitalized on Apple's misstep and actively courted the disgruntled FCP7 users, which worked and then some. Adobe made a more sizable dent in Avid's pro market than FCP7 ever did but it never truly competed at the very high end of the market. I tried Premiere a handful of times over the years but never understood what the fuss was about. My career has mostly been finishing rather than cutting and I stayed with Avid Symphony and DS Nitris for online editing until Autodesk released Smoke for Mac and then moved to Resolve in v10 but I was still round tripping to and from Smoke. By the time v12.5 was out, Resolve had already adopted the best elements of Avid's trimming tools and had become my preferred software not just for conform and finishing, but editing, too. I'm genuinely flabbergasted that Adobe ever managed to foster such loyalty amongst their user base for such a deeply average product.
@@tyesamson yes! And I edited very briefly on Smoke and it was my absolute favorite tool until DaVinci and its addition of Fusion and Fairlight. I work in feature film and I love that I can color, so VFX and also export proper audio stems using busses.
It is so flexible and has so many tools that there is almost no need for plugins.
@@pxlmvr7 The Mac version of Smoke was way ahead of it's time and the market just wasn't ready for an all in one system like that. It filled the hole that Avid created when they discontinued DS and the tabbed pages for specialized tasks was very much a proto-Resolve if Resolve had evolved from a VFX pedigree rather than a color pedigree. I wish Autodesk had given it more time to cook but I totally get why from a business perspective they went all in on Flame. The high end advertising market was always their niche. It's funny you feel that Resolve is what you always wanted from the future of FCP, because I've always thought of where Resolve has landed as the ultimate realization of the Smoke on Mac vision - an ultimate all in one solution.
@@tyesamsonJust a shout out for mentioning AVID's assymetrical trimming.
I think rarely mentioned because people using other NLE can't even imagine how trimming could be handled.
As far as I know I still think no other NLE has even come close. Please enlight me if you know.
That said, for my current use case, I had to switch to Resolve.
Currently I am a "one man band", doing everything from start to finish (editing, audio, titles, color etc). In that area AVID is borderline unusable as a stand alone app. You are probably familiar with the Avid Titler + fiasco and other areas Avid is lagging behind.
Unfortunate because when it comes to pure cutting nothing that I have tried has even comes close to Avid's speed and preciseness. But it doesn't matter when other pretty basic tasks during editing can be very cumbersome in AVID. If you do not have access to an entire post production team where you collaborate with a "specialist" for each area you are much better off using DaVini Resolve for example.
What I love about Blackmagic is that they make Davinci Resolve work better and better without making me buy new hardware ❤ the jump from 18 to 19 is insane as my almost dying laptop now can edit 4k footage without proxies!
Wait - what'd I miss?
@@ProWrestlingPsychology101 I don't know how they did it but my laptop is having a way way easier time editing since upgrading to 19 and I'm on the free version.
@@UnboundedArtandCrafts they enabled the gpu accelerate in free version because this feature was only available in studio. Which now renders happen on gpu rather than cpu.
I came from Adobe (Express) to Adobe (paid) to Final Cut Pro to DaVinci Resolve. Resolve just works better than any of the other options.
I just cut a film in Resolve. It was FX heavy and I was able to do everything without leaving the app
Can you show us a link to the film? Thanks.
Fusion was the reason why didn't want to switch to Resolve 16 and then Fusion was the reason why I switched to Resolve 17. I was an AE user and thought nodes were confusing and pointless until I learned Nuke and the world was set upside down for me, and since that day I realized I've been using a toy that was marketed as tools for adults for the past 5 years of my life. Since then, I've never touched AE or PP or any adobe products. I mostly do compositing and much less mograph, so you are welcome to disagree.
I too use Fusion for compositing. I think a great companion app for MoGraph is Apple Motion. Unfortunatley AE is still king of pro 2D motion graphics.
fusion is fun for compositing!
wish they would improve the mograph options also!
Yo, where can I see some of your work? Especially if you have some mograph videos in there too.
@@Zizos Fusion Resolved on YT.
@@idovidal There are a lot of feature requests for Fusion, both for comp and mograph.
lets hope davinci resolve doesn’t turn to the dark side and ends up like its competitors
Really hoping that Blackmagic does some serious investment in their Motion Graphics workflows to compete with Adobe. AE is still king in mograph. My wish list would be more investment into professional motion graphics workflows, a bigger push for third party plugins (just go look at the functionality you can add with aescripts), and it would be a stretch -- but some sort of overlord/photoshop style integration with some software like Affinity. Oh. And integrate it with blender.
Agreed. in the meantime, Apple Motion is a good companion app to do MoGraph alongside Fusion.
I have requested few tools in their feature suggestion forum. For vfx and motion graphics.
Like - liquefy, puppet pin tool, bevel edge, advance text animator.
Hi Patrick, I got into video back in 1981... I came up through the VHS/S-VHS/BETA/8MM era. I still have my Panasonic S-VHS editing suite set up in my den.
I never used Premiere, I started with FC Pro when I bought my first Apple Laptop from COMP USA in the 90's.
I came over to Resolve with Ver. 14 and Resolve is MY system of choice. I incorporated the Speed Editor and Mini Color Panel into my workflow.
I believe Resolve is putting pressure on Premiere and FC Pro to stay competitive and improve their products with new features and enhancements.
For me, the Elephant in the room is that Premiere REQUIRES a Subscription to use it. Resolve and FC Pro DO NOT... That is a big plus in my book!
Love your videos and keep up the great work.
Rick
🎥📷
hey, similair thing for me, though I stopped being an editor pre digital to being a production manager type lad. Just before the pandemic I wanted to get back to being a little more creative so I thought I would have a go at this digital malarky and chose resolve because it was free and I thought I would try it. Now then, there were some things that I could see would be much "easier" with different drag and drops and the like, but that is only since I went deeper. The interface was fine for me because it was what I was relearning on, the depths you can go to is madness, but again, what I was used to. I do however sometimes miss the simplicity of VHS/Pnuematic editing, scroll, press in, scroll press out, look out for the frame slippage, create graphics on another device and add them in and as for colour, naaah, just take it as it comes! I am only half joking, the more you can do the more you need to learn and sometimes you just want to cut stuff and put a few titles/effects on it but that's what your phones for (and of course the very much underused cutpage)no?
I love resolve, has the best ui and easy to use but, even if you edited for years, all the companies want someone can work with adobe, even freelance service buyers only knows adobe products and if you don't work with those apps, you have a small amount of people to work with or you should work for yourself. It was really hard for me to even start learning AE, but i also wanna make some money so for now, resolve is for people who wants to use advanced program but has no money and people who are soo good buyers dont care about the program or maybe color graders
Adobe has 2 things going on for them.
Photoshop/Illustrator which have given them enormous experience with graphic tools.
And After Effects. AE is a beast. If Fusion ever gets an upgraded renderer that can handle complex effects and tools and also gets more tools, then big oof...
I've tried AI to write me some code so that I could build some plugins for Fusion but it's very hard currently to achieve the tools I'm after without being a coder.
Is it even possible BMD to go that far with this pricing model? Maybe, I hope so. Whatever they do, I do hope it's well coded, optimised and modern. Because Adobe kept building on top of an old platform and that's why they had so many issues with crashes, bugs, etc.
God speed BMD!
I've been editing professonially for about 10 years now, and I've switched from Premiere to FCP to Premiere and finally now on Resolve. The approach that I take, and something I stress to my post production team, is that we're video editors, not Premiere or Resolve specialists. So we will follow the path that's the most promising to get better results. Since switching from Premiere to Resolve, we've seen a huge increase in productivity because our workflow is smoother. No more round tripping or dynamic links, everything is built into one software. The tools on each page are industry standard. I don't have to deal with a Lumetri panel when I can have an industry standard grading page. That's not to say that there were no hiccups, every transition has them. What's important is that we focus on growth and efficiency to make our lives less frustrating.
Jumped from Vegas to Resolve a few years ago, strictly for the only-buy-once aspect and have been very pleased with the constant improvements since then.
I believe we underestimate greatly the amount of professionals that already use DVR exclusively from Cut to Color Grade. I was a hardcore FCPX User and slowly moved on to DVR over a time of 3 years, now I exclusively Edit from A to Z in DVR and I couldn't work in FCPX or PP anymore. DVR is so f awesome.
Is it just me, or do FCP influencers' color in their videos look worse than DaVinci creators?
Going to Resolve after years and years on adobe feels like Dorothy walking out of the tornado house.
😂😂
I’m glad that our community is growing and getting the recognition it deserves. From creators to professionals Blackmagic has been making great decisions and is really driving the market right now. Thanks for the great spotlight Patrick, missed you at NAB this year 😢. You really need to do a training class with BMD soon. You rock 🎉.
I love this video! I feel like i'm hanging out with you. Way to go dude. So much good insight.
Thanks so much! That's so encouraging. These are just the conversations I'd have with all the cool Resolve peeps if we weren't all recording videos alone at home :p
Switched from Filmora to DaVinci Resolve Studio in 2021, haven't looked back and got way more out of it!
I don't know... I'm the biggest fanboy of DR, but let me tell you what is driving me back to FCP and Premiere is Color Management and Fusion. The hoops you have to jump through if you're doing ANY sort of FX work, be it simple titles or adding a jpg to a shot, are CRAZY complicated... Viewer LUTS that don't stick, multiple CSTs, etc. Not to mention, I love the idea of Macro Title Templates, they are a pain to create and even more of a pain to update. If I was solely doing documentary type work I would 100% stay on Resolve. But any graphics work, I'm not jumping through those hoops anymore.
Very real!
(respectfuly) what have you been smoking? DR (industry standard color software) has wayyyyy better color management than FCP, Pr, or AE. Fusion just got a new update for easier color management. Those other apps have terrible HDR workflows/capabilities. Simple titles and adding JPGs is easy in Resolve. I don't know what difficulties you're having.
@@isaacbedford3644 LOL I’m well aware of Resolve’s pedigree, no one would agree with that. and I’m not talking about adding graphics directly to a timeline. The fusion implementation is still half baked. Their recent fixes don’t fix the issues, at least not on my Mac. I’m not saying other software does color management better, but having to add incoming CSTs and outgoing CST and constantly being aware of all the vgotchas, it’s been a big deterrent to fully adopting the software.
Yikes, challenge yourself, learn something new… Da Vinci is so much better than those other programs. It’s almost laughable.
It's not better when it comes to working with titles. Have they even fixed the wraparound issue? That and keyframing velocity are two things in particular Premiere does better than DR. Everything else I'll give you.
Great video Patrick. Really balanced too. Love your office setup btw.
Thanks! I'm really liking the new setup as well. Trying to keep things nice and clean. Got to take a more thorough look at lighting and probably buy some new light for the first time in over a decade though :pp
About, "Everything Everywhere All At Once" ... it literally says on the Blackmagic website that it was color graded in Resolve. And my understanding is that the 3D stuff was done in "Blender" or other similar 3D software. I think the notion that you could not have done that movie in resolve is completely wrong
Patrick. Your conclusions are spot on! Be it the all-in-one programs you get with DaVinci Resolve and at a cost for the Studio version, it's a steal! I am a retired seven time Emmy winning television editor who worked with Avid Media Composer for nearly 20 years, followed by Final Cut Pro Studio and now DaVinci Resolve. Between use of the cloud, remote proxy based editing, quick cutting or editing and multiple people editing on the same project simultaneously, the other systems definitely have something to be concerned about!
Davinci and Motion (which nobody talks about) covers most of the bases. When you throw in the Affinity suite of apps, you can drop most of what you need from Photoshop, Illustrator and InDesign. And not a subscription anywhere.
Now if they'd only implement MIDI in a useable manner, there'd be a few other apps I could drop!!! (I'd even settle with Ableton Link at this point).
re: Affinity, me too! As part of my dropping Adobe for financial reasons mainly, I also picked up Affinity Photo. It works very well for my projects.
@@caspiansfriend We'll see what happens with Affinity now that they've been purchased by Canva. No doubt, they'll become subscription-based sooner or later.
I started this channel looking for free software to edit. I went from having the free software to buying Studio, 4 blackmagic cameras and an atem mini pro iso. Im the customer that Blackmagic is looking for with free software. Get them hooked and they buy the whole ecosystem
Hi, Patrick, thanks for another great video!
It's great to have someone like you on TH-cam!
Two things:
- is this 70%-off Audiio PRO coupon still valid?
- where could I get this wonderful tee you're wearing (Note: I live in South America...lol)?
Thanks once again, pal! You're really great!
Great sharing Patrick. I have examined Adobe and Apple but quickly switched to Black Magic and the studio edition is easily and wisely to buy! Just love DaVinci Resolve!
I think Avid, Adobe and Apple have all seen the writing on the wall. And if they haven't, they're not paying attention. I've cut feature films in Avid. Cut commercial content in FCP. 3 years ago I switched to Resolve when I purchased a BMD camera. And there is no way I'm every going back. The NLE portion of Resolve is rock solid. There's pretty much nothing I used every day in Avid that I can't do in Resolve. And the ability to bounce back and forth between sound and picture without exporting to ProTools. HOLY CRAP. And then of course Resolve's famous grading tools. I'm blown away by BMD.
DaVinci Resolve became my first serious editing program, starting with version 14 or 15-I can't quite remember which. I didn't want to get locked into Adobe's ecosystem, especially since Resolve was free and their pricing is amazing
I started out with a very early version of Premiere and dealt with all of the issues that early versions of Premiere had. Next, was FCP until Apple borked it in 2011. Back to Premiere for a while until Resolve v14 or somewhere thereabouts. Now, with v19, I'm never going back. I do still use Adobe CC for Ps, Ae primarily. Audio is Logic Pro, vector art and print design are Affinity Designer and Publisher. I would be using Fusion if I could get my head wrapped around nodes better. For me to be able to make effective use of Fusion for the things I use Ae for now, I would need two things: a layer/timeline or dope sheet and a full motion/function graph editor for any function that has keyframes. The tiny keyframe/curve editor they have now is simply too small to make careful, subtle keyframe/curve adjustments. This level of control is especially necessary for motion graphics and 3D compositing tasks. If BM added that kind of functionality to Resolve, it could very well be my go-to for all things motion related minus 3D content creation, that will remain Modo and C4D for me.
I came to Resolve for the grading. I was still roundtripping from Premiere and compositing in After Effects and mixing in Logic. Increasingly, I find myself working more and more within Resolve from ingest to delivery. Blackmagic needs to work on incorporating vector files into Fusion, since those assets still need to be animated in After Effects, but the toolset in Fusion is otherwise very robust from tracking to roto. Adobe would have to do some amazing work in the field of color to be competitive with Resolve in that world. Lumetri feels like a toy by comparison.
I have been using Premiere since Adobe acquired it. I was in their beta program for years and to this day, still use many of their products. However, I recently retired and just can't justify the ridiculous licensing fees any longer. I will now only do periodic freelance work - no more full-time. Thus, I have to make some changes. Freaking out a bit at the thought of learning a new platform - especially one as deep and wide as video and audio, but I must. I have already moved to Studio One for audio, but trying to decide on Final Cut vs. DaVinci for video. Thanks for the insight on Resolve!! And wish me luck...
The fact that Adobe doesn't know that Everything Everywhere All at Once could have been completely done in Resolve, include the lions share of the vfx (instead of using After Effects) just shows how while they might be looking at Resolve as competition they are not really deeply reviewing it and it's real toolset.
PLUS - Fusion is really underrated for compositing. It gives AE a run for its money and can do basically 90% of what Nuke does.
Fusion might be good but giving AE a run for it’s money is just Fanboy nonsense.
@@ArminSteiner I take you don't use Fusion and/or are unaware of all its features so this seems more like AE cultishness to me. I didn't see it was miles better than AE in every single way, I just said it rivals it. Fusion is legitimately just a variation of Nuke with a (small) handful of nodes missing, but other ways they are virtually the same. I will happily say that Nuke is better than Fusion overall, but Fusion isn't leagues behind it, just 2nd place. It certainly can do basically anything AE can do (there might be a couple of minor exceptions but nothing significant). I think AE users aren't even aware of what Fusion can do because the node-based system (like Nuke) gives them nightmares (because they refuse to admit that node-based is just superior to a layer workflow). And yes, Fusion also has 3D workflow like AE and NUKE + USD compatibility just fyi
@@ArminSteiner Fusion is better than AE for compositing since it's node-based (like Nuke). AE is better for 2D motion graphics and animation. Fusion users can close the gap by using Apple Motion.
I split my time between the two with most time in Premiere Pro. I wanted to switch to Resolve so bad but the inability to use the tilda (or equivalent) key to maximize panels without a workaround even in version 19 is a deal breaker. Also, setup in Premiere is easier - no database mess. But when Premiere is buggy, Resolve is my backup. When I direct new non-editors interested in editing, I direct them to Resolve's free version.
They both have strengths in which the other lacks. Keyframing in Davinci, and the Spline Editor/Keyframe Editor SUCK. In Premiere it’s amazing. But on the flip side, try to make a character animated text in Premiere Pro.
If either Adobe or Davinci would actually make the features they lack for CREATORS. Not film producers, or people working on big budget projects, but for creators who use their tools to make content (which is their main market). That company would win the race and become the solidified industry standard.
I think it's really hard to know from the outside where the true market lies. Creators are most visible but even between them and Hollywood there's an entire spectrum of working video professionals through all tiers of corporate and marketing work.
Mid 2019 I switched to Resolve because I could not afford Adobe any longer. That year I kept PP and AE on a computer for one client project that required Adobe for their workflow. But Premiere Pro kept crashing. Like a lot! I had approximately 12 restores piled up from constantly crashing and restoring. As an old school IT support guy, I did all the right stuff to try to correct the issue: updated the OS, and PP and stripped out any and every app that might be causing a conflict. Even ran a bunch of tests on my virus protection to see if it was influencing the issue. I never figured out the issue. And it was a simple project. Resolve, on the other hand, "just worked." What a breath of fresh air!! Once I got used to nodes, I never looked back. It's true that sometimes I miss AE. But for my needs, Fusion does everything that I could ever want. I love using Fusion. I have nothing against Premiere Pro and After Effects. But now that I'm in the Resolve "family" I doubt very seriously that I'll be leaving it any time soon.
I came to Resolve from Vegas Pro for video. My primary DAW is Reaper and Fairlight will certainly never replace that, but it is very nice seeing BMD making big improvements to Fairlight (both stability and features). I just installed v19 yesterday and so far this has been the most stable version for audio that I've experienced since I started using Resolve. It's not perfect as I've encountered some bugs with audio in compound clips, but overall it has been sooo much better than my experience was in v18.
Learnt video editing on primiere pro as a beginner during 2020. Abandoned it a year after. Came back in 2023 to final cut after getting m1 mac series for jobs. Switched to DaVinci when jobs got too serious the barriers were just too many for me to put up with final cut especially seeing how apple wasn't caring about the app. Final cut community is incredible but resolve just offers too much to ignore.
I was a very happy adobe user had the full suite. Then the rent sign came up , so I kept using my adobe vs 6 while searching and continued to use adobe. When DVR 15 came up I sewithed and never looked back even if premier had some great tools. Today Im a Davinci and affinity user plus som fusion. I have 4 studio licences and 3 Free licenses in my company if I had stayed in the adobe universe I would have been paying over 4k a year just to rent. Losing everything If I stopped paying. I can write off other things
Premiere Pro has so many issues with it that Adobe really needs to start paying attention to Resolve.
Opps…. I meant from Premier Pro to after effects and back. TH-cam does not really let you edit your comments.
Lifetime license and upgrades.
They listen to their users and Resolve is cross functional with BM cameras, switches etc and spend money into R&D.
I have been with Resolve since version 15. Real good toy for an amateur.
Hi Patrick. I'm is resolve 2years now (studio). Lets be honest. Adobe is still way ahead (except color). But if more people get into resolve, I believe in a couple of years the scale will turn. By the way, I'm trying to find the "fusion comp" on your t-shirts time line. 😁
And on a sidenote @Patrick thank you for making the corner look straight(er) 😊
DaVinci Resolve is a great program for sure and it is reasonably priced. Why would I let Adobe bleed me every month.
I got in Resolve because it was affordable for me and easy to learn. I bought the pro license because I knew I couldn't do without it anymore. And now, I'm wondering how they actually make money to provide that level stability.
The person claims that everywhere all at once was too complicated for resolve… That’s such a bunch of horseshit. What they’re actually saying is that they had to take the movie into after effects to do the special effects. You can still take footage from resolve and put it into after effects, do your thing and then bring it back into resolve. I do that all the time. You can bring individual layers from after effects into resolve… And let’s face it, dynamic linking from Premier Pro to resolve is crap. So doing it old school is perfectly fine. Some third-party software maker could come up with something to dynamically link resolve and after effects… There may be a copyright issue somewhere in there… But don’t be afraid of old school, it works.
I think that, unfortunately, until one can simply open/import a PSD file into their application and then animate the layers, Adobe will have a big advantage, at least in Broadcast. The old Final Cut Pro could do it…
You can import a psd in fusion! Not sure what kind of limitations it has.
@@PatrickStirling really? Never read about it before (could be my fault) that out. There are some serious limitations in AfterEffects as well, so…
If they make gif support for the fusion ui that'll be very good for us.. So we can make good scripting so we can beat after effect 🔥
Most of the times I watch a Davinci Resolve video, the ADs are from Adobe. So, yes, they are scared enough to pay to show you ADs when you want to learn or hear more about Resolve.
5:20 one of the things I actually dislike about resolve. It's a jack of all trades, master of none type of situation. In trying to cater to everyone's needs at the same time they are creating a product that's unintuitive, bloated and unfocused in its design. Don't get me wrong, it is impressive how they were able to make all these different parts work together in one package but it does feel like they are being held together with ducktape
As someone who just wants to learn a few tricks and plays about as a hobby, i like davinci’s offering as free package which is enough for me. I couldn’t justify the cost for a license to play with for a few hours here and there.
I use both Premiere and Resolve on a weekly basis. Even though I have used Premiere longer I am at least 10X faster in Resolve to do the same style of video.
my man doesn't use ad blocker. respect ++
Thanks for the talk, Patrick. FINALLY a video of yours I can follow LOL. My two cents is that Blackmagic needs to add a pro version with a subscription so that they can fund extra testing and 24/7 tech support. I lost my videography business because I constantly ran into project-killing bugs, i.e. the one right around 18.5 that would clear your timeline but also clear it on backed up versions that seemed to be working. If you recall, they patched this and noted the patch in their release notes but never bothered to reach out to the community to tell them that there was a critical bug and to give us a fix timeline. People were in the forums with their hair on fire and not one time did BM acknowledge that there was an ongoing problem, even after they fixed it save for the release note. Now with 19, the forums are basically just people trying to find a way to get more than 3-4 fps... in the full release. Not saying everybody has this issue. There is one user in particular who somehow NEVER has the issues everyone else has LOL. But most of us do. In fact, I haven't been able to edit in months because I started my project in 19 and it just doesn't work. Point being, I love the $300 lifetime license and I hate Adobe's subscription scheme... BUT... I would gladly pay out for the things mentioned previously.
Then you must be on a PC… I’ve done several projects, big ones, on my Mac and I’ve never had an issue. Not even once.
seems like a platform issue then. i work professionaly with resolve betas (!) since v17 and had only small hiccups here and there.
@@littlemodshop I'm happy that you haven't experienced what everybody else has. The official forum is basically a freak out about 19's performance.
Adobe is having one eye on DR but they have such marketshare that they dont need to react for now. Things will change in near future though.
Let me tell you what i need, Davinci for color grade, trimming, sound design, transitions and after effects for animation, time remapping, external plugins and many more..... but i don't see the use of premiere pro, i just have to use that for the dynamic link for after effects ... that's it
I bought DaVinci Resolve Studio recently, to edit video from my A6700 (yes, I'm a hobbyist), a one-off payment, not renting the software as I do LrC, Ps etc. I won't hire any more software from Adobe oncy my prepaid year expires.
I used Premiere and AE for over 15 years but with the the way Adobe treats its customers and the degradation of Adobe's quality, I now only use it if a client has that workflow. As for Everything Everywhere All At Once, Adobe's quote is what Avid users say about EVERYTHING.
Not only do I use Resolve for most of my editing, I am building my entire studio around Blackmagic hardware.
I started Editing Video Before Computers, VHS Tape Decks w/ Switchers & Titler. Then 2 Sony Cam Corders with Switcher & VTCI for Time code. 96' Built an $8000 system using 5 HDD's & Premiere 4.2 (Remember the White Horse) OH it did not work either. Many computers and Last Premier Pro CS3. Then the No Brainer First Davinci FREE then Davinci Studio & a Speed Editor For $295 OUNCE vs $500+/year. But use what ever works for you after all it's the results that count.
Where can I get that sweet tshirt from?
Subscription vs Set Price is a win for me. Adobe got nasty in recent years.
The quote about Premiere being designed for editing to be handed over to other apps/operators for finishing is absolutely hilarious given it's garbage interoperability. Say what you like about Avid's user experience, at least the sentiment of that quote would be intellectually honest if it had come from them. Hearing it come from Adobe is such bad faith it made me literally cackle.
My reason for abandoning Adobe is that Adobe abandoned me. I can't buy Adobe, i have to rent it. I don't rent software. I don't use software that they can alter at the drop of a hat and force me to use their changes. So many features have been removed. Adobe just doesn't get it.
What is the best alternative to Adobe InDesign, Illustrator and Acrobat?
Now we just need to get resolve to support canva and affinity files
Healthy competition is good competition 👌
I left Adobe when they went to subscription. I have tried Sony, Adobe, Edius but am staying with Resolve.
love that tshirt. Where?/?
Everything you can do with Adobe, you can do with Resolve, and more. What is told in the article about "Everything Everywhere All at Once" is just marketing BS. Ediitng is about story telling with cuts and sometimes FX protopyping. Then you generate a timline in a portable format. That's all.
Love me some resolve
For now I still prefer editing in premiere because the edit page workflow in resolve doesn't appeal to me as much (premiere just feels "snappier" and more specific - when it isn't freezing or crashing that is) but for colour resolve is indispensable and the speed at which they're adding to it and implementing feedback, while running a one time purchase model truly puts Adobe to shame.
My guess is you’re on a PC… Resolve runs much quicker faster steadier on a Mac. Especially the M series.
@@2424rocket true, I am on PC, but I also prefer the interface for editing in premiere but that may just be because I'm used to it
they just made their cc suite even more expensive it KEEPS rising..
Have Lightroom or Photoshop gained the ability to open single-frame BRAW files?
I started using Resolve 6 years ago and permanently dumped all Adobe products.
Yeah clearly Adobe aren't afraid because they won't fix AAFX and premiere bugs. Hell even flash/animate still has bugs from macromedia.
Da Vinci giving free version with no strings attached. Adobe went down because of their Cloud and unethical Business practices
Since i have resolve i dont even think about premiere. Resolve is much better and much cheaper, the node based editing is superior. Resolve just kills premiere
Video Copilot was awesome, until they disappeared.
What people use for their hobby is irrelevant. If they want a job at an awesome company, they'd better have strong fundamental skills and the flexibility to quickly learn whatever package their new employer is using. AKA, put all your eggs in one basket at your peril.
uso davince é gosto muito de suas ferramentas futuramente vou comprar a versão estudio.
I bought the studio version early in 2021. I am very glad that I did! Auto correcting color was worth it. But much more than that, now my GPU is being utilized way more in the studio version. And that is very important to me.
I'm really trying to like resolve but it just swaps down my machine, even with proxies. Premiere pro just rolls through my masters fine, sometimes I drop playbck resolution for timing once things get too intense but still swift. Also don't like how resolve does database projects. Very stupid. Would rather have files. Now I have to build a project server for it to go between all my machines instead of just running off my NAS. I'm sure some is user error setup but honestly it's a pain and haven't had time to test best proxies to use and all the various settings.
Davinci resolve Map plugins of world map pack please 😢
Sir it is Very demanding video from all editor of davinci resolve that your next video should be world map animation plugin for davinci resolve so sir kindly reply me if you will do we will wait for that please reply?
Am I the only one gettitn Adobe ads while watching this? 😂
There is one Quote that sums it up for the Little guys
"Hey Dummy It' is all about the Money".
FREE/$295 What's to Problem?
First, and resolve ftw
🤘
DaVinci is light-years better than Premiere.
👍
Yeah shot themselves in the foot with FCPx
You need to work on your thumbnails.
you clicked
Duck Adobe
I used resolve but now switching to After effects for advance stuff and Adobe for basic editing (because I am on mac and can't plugins like shappire univ and bcc 😭)
Just use Fusion and Apple Motion instead
Black Magic is GREAT but their camera design team needs a SLAP.
What does SLAP stand for?
Acquisition better not be on the horizon 😖🤞🏽
i am tired.
davinci is part of bmd. a hardware company.
ppro is part of adobe. a software company.
use whichever you like. why constantly try to find which is the best. they are all good. just edit. that's all.