I have extensively tested this and while yes it has potential it also has some serious limitations (for now) on prime example being a lot of the scripts won't work simply because the dataset ChatGpt uses ends in 2021. A lot of the python calls have changed in that time so you will get a number of errors.
if you add the DAN " Do Anything Now" script it will reveal chatgpt is connected to the internet and the database has been updated in secret. then you can unlock more potential out of scripting when its limits are released
I love ChatGPT, I've been using it as debugger when I am stuck on a code problem and it's very powerful how quickly it can find the problems. A few tips if you want good responses from ChatGPT: If the response isn't what you're looking for you can just try to regenerate the answer sometimes it'll fix itself Another thing you can do is tell it why the response it gave isn't what you're looking for, it'll sometimes recognize its past mistakes and fix them. Another thing that happens quite often is that ChatGPT randomly cuts off its response. If you simply give "continue" as the next prompt it usually continues where it left off. Overall it's way more powerful than I had originally anticipated and I can definitely see Chat AIs like this to replace search engines in the future. Anyways, great video! I love this use case for ChatGPT
I've already used it to help me figure out what node setup to use in Unreal Engine to make certain game mechanics work. As you said, if it didnt work the first time, TELL IT WHY, and it'll try to change the solution.
any tips for the cut off? x_x (it cuts off most of the time, if I write "continue" to it, "continue where you left off", the AI does the same thing again from the beginning and if it's code I have to wait for it to finish so it shows me cut off, ah)
You don't have to write "write a python script" and other stuff several times. It would've been enough to say "now write one with" or even just the "circular array instead" part. That's one of the big things, you don't have to repeat yourself, it understands context.
The fractal at 10:30 looks like the julia fractals we used to make with POV-Ray back in the day. It can be described as a 3D slice/shadow of a 4D object. Cool stuff :)
OMG thans a lot ! Im building a game related with Hyperdimensional spaces and had this dream how the conroll room will look like and cant find the name of it. BoooM its an actual 4D fractal set What The Actual F ! ! ! I drawn it and trying to model it but i Know it will look better Proceduralised Now I can Make it Yuhey How our brain works is a misstery for me.
As I said somewhere else: Only run these scripts once you read them and understood them. Blender Python scripts can access your hard disk and do anything to it. E.g. delete everything. Verify that it is not some garbage code that accidentally destroys stuff. Also I guess the last line of the script that failed should be: for material in materials: bpy.data.materials.remove(material)
@lucian6172 I don't mean that Blender is doing something bad, I mean that I don't trust the output of such AIs to actually only do what you asked it to do every time. I'd say only use that stuff as a better auto-complete if you're a software developer.
@lucian6172 ur comment was deleted might want to repost it I can only see ur other one in the section but on notifications u have a reply that never made it to the section unless you are cringe and deleted it
5:40 -- You can also paste or even basically describe the error you got in GPT and it'll try to recode or fix the problem or at least explain what's going on ... super helpful.
Would be really cool to take whatever code generated that shape at the end and tell it that the code generated a very interesting twisted shape that you weren’t intending. But you feel inspired and you’d like to see if Chat GPT could use these sorts of principals to generate alien architecture, or some sort of spider-web floating city or something.
I've tried out having chatGPT write scripts for me and I'd say that the most useful thing for getting good results is to know how to code. That way you can often fix mistakes that it makes yourself if it doesn't know where it went wrong.
This is thing I’ve been trying to get in peoples heads, which your example is perfect. This won’t replace us (in the short term) but it will kick out low skill labor.
Interesting video. I tried Blender about twelve years ago. I did not have the time or motivation to press forward with learning any more. This illustrates that ChatGPT is a good learning tool for the casual user. Many thanks.
One thing i haven't seen people mention is that you can actually give the bot any type of code, it will read it and explain what it does, then hold onto it. Then you can ask it to add features to that code, like if you have some software you want to add features to but don't know how, it can do it for you.. its so damn useful and also scary because it knows languages that it shouldn't know like pawn (amxx) which is a very uncommon and old language for the original half-life game engine.. its remarkable what it knows
Yea I had to learn « Maude » a very niche language for problem verification, and it hasnt any documentation aside from the official one, but chatgpt still recognized it and gave me very accurate examples and explaination. I could even ask it about the difference between this and another more popular langage i know and it was able to explain
You can also get it to convert between languages, which is why it can program in obscure languages. It makes off-by-one errors and when it's wrong it's confidently wrong though.
does this mean i never have to learn pyhton fully? that would be epic and free us from this repetitive work...i just can do primitive html and c++ a bit and never wanted to learn code but love doing CGI and editing..
I gave the bot documentation for a serial port device it didn't know anything about, and it started writing code to interface with it and explaining the documentation.
Holy shit...no this is unreal..we live in the future..it's a bit too intimidating to know that we have the tech to give a computer a description of a Python script and get it from an AI like that in a few seconds/minutes..I can't believe this is real (I thought about this idea before of AI being able to write apps and such but didn't expect it to come that quickly)
you don't have to ask "write a python script for blender" in every ask. once you ask, it knows what you are trying o do from previous chats. just ask "write another one for........." or "write code for", and if you generate 2 or 3 codes, you dont even have asked those just "what about....... this", "now.... this", "and......this" will do... just like a human understanding. that is the beauty of chat gpt
part of the issue is that, like with the stability diffusion image generation, chatgpt in its current form lacks focus, or specialization. So, for programming, or medical or even sci fi lore, you'll have to wait for custom trained models that can take advantage of chatGPT's current knowledge base and refine it with new keywords and information, then this new data on top of what is currently available will need training by humans to get a more accurate response to what the humans actually want out of it. this 'new data' and 'new training' will hopefully be handled by smaller companies with a focus on one specific area of expertise, if for no other reason than to cut down on tech support calls by some significant percentile. so a team of smart people with lots of access to lots of hardware. in the future you'd want a user generated tool similar to chatGPT, which was made specifically to cater to the blender audience, which may include information and training that goes beyond simple scripting.
The whole point is to be able to recognize you are using blender and use its trained data to specify an output for that you don't need another tool specifically for the blender audience. It will gradually improve also you have to be giving more specific prompts if you want more specific results.
I just started to use this. I always have trouble getting my CSS to look right (to the customer), especially oddball alignments and pop overs, etc. It's saved me hours of fiddling with CSS and JS, and while mistakes abound, they're easily correctable
As a software developer I feel it’s really nice, like the code generated is super dope… definitely not going to replace human programmers lol, but like if you’re junior - mid level in an area of development you’d be crazy to not use this AI to get ahead in the workspace… I use it to code small repetitive things for me while I’m working on something else, then I just swap over - code review what the AI sent me, if it’s good I’ll put it in. I do see people, those who are probably not devs worry about jobs being replaced, don’t think so… maybe in 15 years SOME if we are thinking that way.. think about this, Web Developers still have jobs and there are 100+ websites that will auto generate you a website + database for $30 lmao, now we have this AI?… YOURE fine. As of right now, the AI is basically a coding assistant, like if we all had some super smart intern follow us around to do our bidding.
As someone brand new, it is amazing for telling you how to turn your ideas into code, and basically useless for telling you how to get the code to actually run.
@@AndreasKempe I hope so. Good thing I have other skills in life to make money… others in my field, probably not on my level. I hope AI takes over game development first though - those are the laziest most unskilled devs you’ll ever meet in your life
@@AndreasKempe idiot detected lol. Just say you don't know what you're talking about. According to you, reading documentation for an API would mean someone isn't a developer lmao.
There are often what we call "+1 errors" with language models. Which means the code it gave you that failed could have just a small iteration mistake, etc... It doesn't really understand the code, it tries to do something that looks to make sense given the context. Try to ask it to multiply numbers to see what I mean. There's a chance it could have fixed the script if you asked it the right way. There's a new kind of job called "prompt engineer", people who know how to query generative models efficiently
BTW...if the script it writes gets stopped in the middle of it then you can tell it to "continue" and it will sometimes be able to continue from where it stopped (it just gets messed up a bit with the type of text it then shows)
Great video! I made an add on for Blender using Chat-GPT. Now I have a render button that can render out a scene with multiple cameras. No manual work 💪😂
I was asking ChatGPT about its coding capabilities. In short, it "admitted" that it is not capable of writing completely new code, it only combines different pieces of code that it saw and changes values, strings and variable names. Though it is still very useful, kinda StackOverflow on steroids.
If people think this will take over coding jobs than all jobs can be taken by AI. And at that point why would humans even need school or education if we don't need to run things for ourselves and the AI handles it all. We'll become consumers and only consumers.
We would need school and education only for doing this stuff for fun at that point. That's when we'll eventually realize that having a job doesn't matter in the long run. What matters is your passion/hobby.
I think the „unknown Objekt“ at 10:30 is the view of Feigenbaum diagram in the Mandelbrot set. Look for Mandelbrot and Feigenbaum diagram. Actually it’s the same but different view.
This software is pretty incredible. I had it write a speech for me to read at a town hall meeting. I posted it to the community tab on my page. I also tried some other things. I asked it if it could write code for a bot that responds to every mention of the word "mccucumber" on twitter and it said "sure" and wrote up the code and instructed me how to use it. Crazy.
First thing I thought when you showed the fractal pillar, was an inverse of the script that creates a fractal hole. Then animating the pillar into the hole for a seamless fractal shaped precision fit demo.
As a brand new Python using, I've been using ChatGPT to help me make games in Pygame. I find it is absolutely brilliant for telling me how to take an idea and turn it into code, how to clean up and organize my code, more efficient ways to accomplish what I want to accomplish. However after my code gets to be a few hundred lines, any time there's a bug, ChatGPT has a very hard time finding solutions that don't break something else. Often I get stuck in recursive loops where Thing A is broken, so I get a solution that fixes that, but breaks Thing B. And the only solutions it offers me to fix Thing B would undo the fix for Thing A. Try to ask for third options and it gets confused and keeps telling me to do those two things over and over. Sometimes starting a new conversation helps, but sometimes the new conversation won't let you post codeshare links, which is unfortunate.
ChatGPT isn't very useful for Blender scripting - when you ask it for anything more specific than some funny small code snippets, it will start to hallucinate fictional methods and other nonsense. Which makes sense, because Blender coding is way less popular than a regular Python, and so the training data didn't contain enough examples to put together answers from. But it is a language model (which isn't optimized for programming or math at all), so not surprising. It's actually impressive it still can generate some code. It would be great to have a one trained for programming though, then it could actually become very useful.
Hi Jan, It's true that ChatGPT is prone to mistakes, not only misunderstanding what you need but also by just making bogus scripts and claiming that they work. For someone like me, who is a newbie to code, it can be a very useful tool to use code and learn to understand it. I also regularly ask it how to fix other stuff in Blender instead of trying to find the right article or video on the Internet. With that said, everyone should absolutely still be encouraged to develop proper knowledge of coding if they want to get into it, even if only to create better prompts for AI. Without this knowledge I'm sure people will still fall behind and waste time compared to seasoned programmers.
@@StrayCreations Sure, but in it's current state I am not sure it is good to use it for bugfixing or learning, because programming isn't just about being happy it works somehow. Better to verify it's answers in some competent sources.
I work currently as a houdini particle effects artist in AA games. For cutscenes and houdini engine as well as multiple pass compositing. I use mainly VEX code whenever i can as it runs often twice as efficient and also it's more intuitive. Things like vop switch conditions can be written as "if" statements. And deletion of points and noise deformers is also sped up. I've asked chatgpt3 for days to write me a code or make the code better. It always always messes it up or makes up syntax or makes fake functions that have never existed. Complex issues aren't as easy as telling it to code a basic port scanner in python. I'm super let down by AI right now. Also some workflows aren't even on the web I've noticed. Like creating an efficient vortex for water sim using the gravity forces from normal orientations instead of velocities. It's unable to build things like this often as well.
This 3d shape surely looks like some Julia code. There are many shapes to be made using fractals, that looks like of of them. A shape constructed from a mathematical formula.
so imagine when it starts accidentally creating "genius" level architecture for a tiny home, an RV, or an , car/vehicle/scooter design, even AI generated molecules for medicines
I don't have time to mess around with it now but a fun thing to play with would be to have it generate BVH mocap files of the motions you want that are targeted at a standard Rigify rig. You would need to specify the FPS, but the bot should be able to generate everything else. BVH files are just plain text files so it should be easy to cut-n-paste to a file. I'd be interested to see if it could generate accurate animations for the human, dog, and bird rigs.
Since it's a language model the outputs for full meshes and animation are very limited. This could change in the future though, since people are constantly discovering new uses for ChatGPT
from PIL import Image # Image size width, height = 800, 600 # Create a blank image with a white background img = Image.new('RGB', (width, height), (255, 255, 255)) # The complex plane real_min, real_max = -2, 1 imag_min, imag_max = -1, 1 real_range = real_max - real_min imag_range = imag_max - imag_min # Maximum number of iterations max_iter = 256 # Generate the Mandelbrot set for x in range(width): for y in range(height): # Map pixel position to complex number c = complex(real_min + x * real_range / (width - 1), imag_min + y * imag_range / (height - 1)) # Iterate until the point is outside of the circle with radius 2 z = 0 for i in range(max_iter): if abs(z) > 2: break # Compute the next iteration z = z**2 + c # Color the point based on the number of iterations img.putpixel((x, y), (i % 8 * 32, i % 16 * 16, i % 32 * 8)) # Save the image img.save('mandelbrot.png')
This python code was generated by chatGPT very quickly. It took me far longer to get it to run though, but ... GPT told me how - which was even more impressive !
I had ChatGPT generate multithreaded code to crack passwords with Python, this thing is great because you can ask it to simply generate the routine you imagined and then implement it however you see fit!
You make a great point! By giving ChatGPT a clear set of instructions that you know should make sense within the context of the application you're using, it will usually generate a better script.
Good stuff. The AI searches a massive database - the key strength of computing - and selects the most relevant results. It relay those results based on parameters defined by clever algorithms. The final result can be relayed as sentences, numerical values, or even programming language, in this case, or any combination of the three - just as it was DESIGNED to do. This is impressive stuff, no doubt, but let's not forget the human element in this story! The most fascinating aspect of this AI era is observing how WE(the end user) ascribe "person" or "agency" to AI. It's like we are so entranced by the illusion of a consciousness on the other side of the 'monitor,' that we are seemingly unable to credit the ACTUAL mind or consciousness behind it all - the human entity! This propensity to ascribe metaphysical qualities(knowledge, emotion, conscience) to non-living entities will only get stronger as the technology improves, and the illusion becomes more profound. If there's ever a "singularity," it wouldn't happen because AI eventually took over... it will be because we WILLINGLY gave up our humanity, and chose to *honor the created entity(AI), rather than the creator(Man)*. The irony is that this wouldn't be the first time we've committed THAT offense. We've done it with our own Creator.
I was using it to write a simple Circuit board material, it was missing a few steps and didn't account for the right properties, i can see its usefulness if you stuck or have an error as it will help you find the problem esp. if your using scripts.
It's a shame that is completely overloaded now... I haven't been able to get into ChatGPT for that last week or so... which sucks cause I am a new game designer and it was really helping me to understand how to program and create a game I am working on...
Just a slight correction. It takes many million dollars to train chatGPT and it will not be constantly updated due to that. But the next iteration GPT 4 will be many many folds better than this current version 3.5
I wonder if the funky shape at the end is a example of a fractal function that has each cross section slice as a 2d fractal that then modulates a value as it goes from right to left out up or down or however it calculated the shape. Maybe even by rotation. It's kinda like an MRI maybe
While tech advancement is good... it also takes away man's intuitive thinking and problem solving neurons.... when your brain stops working and completely relies on a machine, it deprecates those neurons it'd use ordinarily to addresss such problems... that is why, even with the plenty advanced cinematography tools (camera, rendering machines, realtimes... etc) yet the quality of movies we see now are dropping faster than the tools are growing... we only still appreciate good films from Old seasoned directors and filmmakers who still use traditional skills to make better use of the modern equipment...
The abstract object looks like a a mineral/rock natural crystal type formation. I bet there are some natural minerals formed in this way. Obviously not using chat GPT and Blender, but how the Mandelbrot is seen in most of nature and formed from the Mandelbrot formation/pattern.
I would say that the last one you created that you don't know the name of looks organic, like muscle tissue or plant-like. Crazy! (BTW-maybe try asking ChatGPT what it's called-lol).
@@DonHall666 chill my comment isn't against Blender, it's more about ChatGPT hindering the learning process. It's a tool not a one size fits all solution
@@eftorq it sounds like you're too chill over there. Put up some proof, show us how Houdini can do what you say in a shorter time. Teach us the things you think this tool is taking away from our learning. Otherwise you're really just answering a question nobody's asked.
I've been tried this before (making fractal object such as Mandelbulb), but never got a result. When I apply the script, the object is either disappear or the script is error. I think, even though we only writing a prompt, it is necessary to write detail, specific, and clear writing. I only wrote "write phyton script to make a Mandelbulb model in Blender". So, I guess it's not detail enough.
I dont understand why you would wish for that, creativity, artistic expression and emotions are pretty deep human assets. I assume you are some game developer or similar and want to save yourself some coin. The statement itself has a sad message if you ask me, but i understand the excitement. Getting created whatever you come up with sounds fascinating indeed.
@@RampantDaydream i Mean... I think it should ease things and assist. If it replaces core human traits, which in my opinion it cant do, then if we think it can, what would be left for us than pure boredom? If we can have everything within seconds, its like playing a game with cheatcodes. Then its fun for 5 minutes and after that we lose complete the point of it all. Whats your take on this? Just came to my head
Nice hairdo! (coming from a random guy whose hair is disappearing already LoLs) Reminds me of the movie in the 80's "Back To The Future" or is it just me or you're camera settings was also set to 80's style quality?
I have extensively tested this and while yes it has potential it also has some serious limitations (for now) on prime example being a lot of the scripts won't work simply because the dataset ChatGpt uses ends in 2021. A lot of the python calls have changed in that time so you will get a number of errors.
I've gotten in the habbit of telling it to check for errors a few times after writing any script and have had some good results. But you aren't wrong
have it query a live api
@@ferdacoin2727 can it do that?!
@@dissonanceparadiddle no i dont think
if you add the DAN " Do Anything Now" script it will reveal chatgpt is connected to the internet and the database has been updated in secret. then you can unlock more potential out of scripting when its limits are released
I love ChatGPT, I've been using it as debugger when I am stuck on a code problem and it's very powerful how quickly it can find the problems. A few tips if you want good responses from ChatGPT:
If the response isn't what you're looking for you can just try to regenerate the answer sometimes it'll fix itself
Another thing you can do is tell it why the response it gave isn't what you're looking for, it'll sometimes recognize its past mistakes and fix them.
Another thing that happens quite often is that ChatGPT randomly cuts off its response. If you simply give "continue" as the next prompt it usually continues where it left off.
Overall it's way more powerful than I had originally anticipated and I can definitely see Chat AIs like this to replace search engines in the future.
Anyways, great video! I love this use case for ChatGPT
These are some great additional tips! Thank you :)
I've already used it to help me figure out what node setup to use in Unreal Engine to make certain game mechanics work. As you said, if it didnt work the first time, TELL IT WHY, and it'll try to change the solution.
too bad they nerfed it for like 60% of content. i am waiting for somebody to make open source version
@@milandjukic4583 nerfed it how? I've seen some of the changes but dont know which would be considered 'nerfs'
any tips for the cut off? x_x (it cuts off most of the time, if I write "continue" to it, "continue where you left off", the AI does the same thing again from the beginning and if it's code I have to wait for it to finish so it shows me cut off, ah)
You don't have to write "write a python script" and other stuff several times. It would've been enough to say "now write one with" or even just the "circular array instead" part. That's one of the big things, you don't have to repeat yourself, it understands context.
The fractal at 10:30 looks like the julia fractals we used to make with POV-Ray back in the day. It can be described as a 3D slice/shadow of a 4D object. Cool stuff :)
Yup, looks like a quaternion julia set/fractal from what I find in google images.
OMG thans a lot ! Im building a game related with Hyperdimensional spaces and had this dream how the conroll room will look like and cant find the name of it. BoooM its an actual 4D fractal set What The Actual F ! ! !
I drawn it and trying to model it but i Know it will look better Proceduralised Now I can Make it Yuhey
How our brain works is a misstery for me.
@@fabianeer41 Thak you this is so usefull deffinitely going to speed up things. So exited to make this.
@@maxmugen88 POV Ray. I'd forgotten about that too. I had it for the Atari ST
a.k.a. a Lyapunov fractal
As I said somewhere else: Only run these scripts once you read them and understood them. Blender Python scripts can access your hard disk and do anything to it. E.g. delete everything. Verify that it is not some garbage code that accidentally destroys stuff.
Also I guess the last line of the script that failed should be:
for material in materials:
bpy.data.materials.remove(material)
@lucian6172 I don't mean that Blender is doing something bad, I mean that I don't trust the output of such AIs to actually only do what you asked it to do every time. I'd say only use that stuff as a better auto-complete if you're a software developer.
no
No
@lucian6172 ur comment was deleted might want to repost it I can only see ur other one in the section but on notifications u have a reply that never made it to the section unless you are cringe and deleted it
quick tip: you can tell the AI what went wrong in Blender (copy the Error message from the console) and then the AI will change the code
5:40 -- You can also paste or even basically describe the error you got in GPT and it'll try to recode or fix the problem or at least explain what's going on ... super helpful.
the fractal at 10:50 first reminded me of "burning ship" but after some googling, it looks to probably be a "quaternion Julia set"
Would be really cool to take whatever code generated that shape at the end and tell it that the code generated a very interesting twisted shape that you weren’t intending. But you feel inspired and you’d like to see if Chat GPT could use these sorts of principals to generate alien architecture, or some sort of spider-web floating city or something.
I've tried out having chatGPT write scripts for me and I'd say that the most useful thing for getting good results is to know how to code. That way you can often fix mistakes that it makes yourself if it doesn't know where it went wrong.
This is thing I’ve been trying to get in peoples heads, which your example is perfect. This won’t replace us (in the short term) but it will kick out low skill labor.
Interesting video. I tried Blender about twelve years ago. I did not have the time or motivation to press forward with learning any more.
This illustrates that ChatGPT is a good learning tool for the casual user. Many thanks.
WOW... this fricking crazy...especially the Bulk Actions part...
One thing i haven't seen people mention is that you can actually give the bot any type of code, it will read it and explain what it does, then hold onto it. Then you can ask it to add features to that code, like if you have some software you want to add features to but don't know how, it can do it for you.. its so damn useful and also scary because it knows languages that it shouldn't know like pawn (amxx) which is a very uncommon and old language for the original half-life game engine.. its remarkable what it knows
Yea I had to learn « Maude » a very niche language for problem verification, and it hasnt any documentation aside from the official one, but chatgpt still recognized it and gave me very accurate examples and explaination. I could even ask it about the difference between this and another more popular langage i know and it was able to explain
You can also get it to convert between languages, which is why it can program in obscure languages. It makes off-by-one errors and when it's wrong it's confidently wrong though.
does this mean i never have to learn pyhton fully? that would be epic and free us from this repetitive work...i just can do primitive html and c++ a bit and never wanted to learn code but love doing CGI and editing..
I gave the bot documentation for a serial port device it didn't know anything about, and it started writing code to interface with it and explaining the documentation.
Holy shit...no this is unreal..we live in the future..it's a bit too intimidating to know that we have the tech to give a computer a description of a Python script and get it from an AI like that in a few seconds/minutes..I can't believe this is real (I thought about this idea before of AI being able to write apps and such but didn't expect it to come that quickly)
you don't have to ask "write a python script for blender" in every ask. once you ask, it knows what you are trying o do from previous chats. just ask "write another one for........." or "write code for", and if you generate 2 or 3 codes, you dont even have asked those just "what about....... this", "now.... this", "and......this" will do... just like a human understanding. that is the beauty of chat gpt
part of the issue is that, like with the stability diffusion image generation, chatgpt in its current form lacks focus, or specialization. So, for programming, or medical or even sci fi lore, you'll have to wait for custom trained models that can take advantage of chatGPT's current knowledge base and refine it with new keywords and information, then this new data on top of what is currently available will need training by humans to get a more accurate response to what the humans actually want out of it. this 'new data' and 'new training' will hopefully be handled by smaller companies with a focus on one specific area of expertise, if for no other reason than to cut down on tech support calls by some significant percentile. so a team of smart people with lots of access to lots of hardware.
in the future you'd want a user generated tool similar to chatGPT, which was made specifically to cater to the blender audience, which may include information and training that goes beyond simple scripting.
And eventually merge all of them into an absolute titan of knowledge able to pick between different "personalities" to fit the given context.
@@failureforbeginners10 that's literally what chatgpt is lmao
The whole point is to be able to recognize you are using blender and use its trained data to specify an output for that you don't need another tool specifically for the blender audience. It will gradually improve also you have to be giving more specific prompts if you want more specific results.
I read the title and realized I never thought about if Chatgpt could write a python script.
I tried this to create a simple table and it did a good job.
This is the best use of "AI" I have seen so far. This is awesome.
dude your hair is heroic I'm very jealous!
What you saw with that taffy pull at the end is when chaos and fractals combine. 🤩 Good stuff!
I just started to use this. I always have trouble getting my CSS to look right (to the customer), especially oddball alignments and pop overs, etc. It's saved me hours of fiddling with CSS and JS, and while mistakes abound, they're easily correctable
As a software developer I feel it’s really nice, like the code generated is super dope… definitely not going to replace human programmers lol, but like if you’re junior - mid level in an area of development you’d be crazy to not use this AI to get ahead in the workspace… I use it to code small repetitive things for me while I’m working on something else, then I just swap over - code review what the AI sent me, if it’s good I’ll put it in.
I do see people, those who are probably not devs worry about jobs being replaced, don’t think so… maybe in 15 years SOME if we are thinking that way.. think about this, Web Developers still have jobs and there are 100+ websites that will auto generate you a website + database for $30 lmao, now we have this AI?… YOURE fine.
As of right now, the AI is basically a coding assistant, like if we all had some super smart intern follow us around to do our bidding.
As someone brand new, it is amazing for telling you how to turn your ideas into code, and basically useless for telling you how to get the code to actually run.
Software "developers" like you will definitely be replaced by such "AI" in the near future. Super Dope.
@@AndreasKempe I hope so. Good thing I have other skills in life to make money… others in my field, probably not on my level. I hope AI takes over game development first though - those are the laziest most unskilled devs you’ll ever meet in your life
@@AndreasKempe idiot detected lol.
Just say you don't know what you're talking about.
According to you, reading documentation for an API would mean someone isn't a developer lmao.
@@PDCMYTC einer der sich "DONT CHECK MY TH-camCHANNEL" nennt sollte mit dem Wort "Idiot" sehr vorsichtig sein.
An excellent challenge would be to use Chat-GPT and Blender to build a 3D character with that huge tuft of yours!
Fun to see a guy from the 80s explaining us how to use chatGPT. Must be a time traveller or smth
There are often what we call "+1 errors" with language models. Which means the code it gave you that failed could have just a small iteration mistake, etc...
It doesn't really understand the code, it tries to do something that looks to make sense given the context.
Try to ask it to multiply numbers to see what I mean.
There's a chance it could have fixed the script if you asked it the right way.
There's a new kind of job called "prompt engineer", people who know how to query generative models efficiently
BTW...if the script it writes gets stopped in the middle of it then you can tell it to "continue" and it will sometimes be able to continue from where it stopped (it just gets messed up a bit with the type of text it then shows)
Daaamn son goku, what's with that hair? :))) looks so cool.
1:35 That script can actually place the cubes as far away as 17.3 units from the origin, since it places them in a cube instead of a sphere.
Great video! I made an add on for Blender using Chat-GPT. Now I have a render button that can render out a scene with multiple cameras. No manual work 💪😂
WTF BRO, i actually was trying to do fractal scripts with chat gpt just yesterday! The fractal at the end is quaternion!
Dude that's so cool! Subscribed 👍
Insane, this is really amazing
little David Bowie!
Thank you :)
I promise! In 5 years, an ai robot will be a housekeeper in your house! If it doesn't work, I'll shoot Haribo jelly to the person who left a comment.
Can I have the haribo jelly in 5 years if it doesn't happen?
I love Chat GPT ..use it for everything 😁
I was asking ChatGPT about its coding capabilities. In short, it "admitted" that it is not capable of writing completely new code, it only combines different pieces of code that it saw and changes values, strings and variable names. Though it is still very useful, kinda StackOverflow on steroids.
If people think this will take over coding jobs than all jobs can be taken by AI. And at that point why would humans even need school or education if we don't need to run things for ourselves and the AI handles it all. We'll become consumers and only consumers.
We would need school and education only for doing this stuff for fun at that point. That's when we'll eventually realize that having a job doesn't matter in the long run. What matters is your passion/hobby.
@@sonario6489 the only passion/hobby you will have is consuming stuff.
@@AironyAi And making art/animation for yourself.
@@sonario6489 but if everything is automated, do you think people will develope any skills? art skills? like in wall-e :D
@@AironyAi There's always a choice to not use automation for certain things if you like the manual approach better
I think the „unknown Objekt“ at 10:30 is the view of Feigenbaum diagram in the Mandelbrot set.
Look for Mandelbrot and Feigenbaum diagram. Actually it’s the same but different view.
Wow, this is revolutionary.
Make that final shape into a nicely lit wallpaper file!
ChatGPT is the response to google’ keyword search deficiencies. Unprecedented.
love the hans klok hair keep it up
The shape at 10:30 is what you get when you try to obtain a 3D Mandelbrot set by naive method. Those that invented the mandelbulb, went that path.
This software is pretty incredible. I had it write a speech for me to read at a town hall meeting. I posted it to the community tab on my page. I also tried some other things. I asked it if it could write code for a bot that responds to every mention of the word "mccucumber" on twitter and it said "sure" and wrote up the code and instructed me how to use it. Crazy.
great video and the algo recognizes that! keep it up
Amazing video , definitely subscribing
Welcome aboard!
First thing I thought when you showed the fractal pillar, was an inverse of the script that creates a fractal hole. Then animating the pillar into the hole for a seamless fractal shaped precision fit demo.
the fractal at 10:30 kinda reminds me of the burning ship mandelbrot
As a brand new Python using, I've been using ChatGPT to help me make games in Pygame.
I find it is absolutely brilliant for telling me how to take an idea and turn it into code, how to clean up and organize my code, more efficient ways to accomplish what I want to accomplish.
However after my code gets to be a few hundred lines, any time there's a bug, ChatGPT has a very hard time finding solutions that don't break something else. Often I get stuck in recursive loops where Thing A is broken, so I get a solution that fixes that, but breaks Thing B. And the only solutions it offers me to fix Thing B would undo the fix for Thing A. Try to ask for third options and it gets confused and keeps telling me to do those two things over and over.
Sometimes starting a new conversation helps, but sometimes the new conversation won't let you post codeshare links, which is unfortunate.
ChatGPT isn't very useful for Blender scripting - when you ask it for anything more specific than some funny small code snippets, it will start to hallucinate fictional methods and other nonsense.
Which makes sense, because Blender coding is way less popular than a regular Python, and so the training data didn't contain enough examples to put together answers from.
But it is a language model (which isn't optimized for programming or math at all), so not surprising. It's actually impressive it still can generate some code.
It would be great to have a one trained for programming though, then it could actually become very useful.
Hi Jan,
It's true that ChatGPT is prone to mistakes, not only misunderstanding what you need but also by just making bogus scripts and claiming that they work. For someone like me, who is a newbie to code, it can be a very useful tool to use code and learn to understand it. I also regularly ask it how to fix other stuff in Blender instead of trying to find the right article or video on the Internet. With that said, everyone should absolutely still be encouraged to develop proper knowledge of coding if they want to get into it, even if only to create better prompts for AI. Without this knowledge I'm sure people will still fall behind and waste time compared to seasoned programmers.
@@StrayCreations Sure, but in it's current state I am not sure it is good to use it for bugfixing or learning, because programming isn't just about being happy it works somehow.
Better to verify it's answers in some competent sources.
its a language model but its built in part on a codex model that's why it can code like it does
The ability to select all objects that have the same color is already something super useful for me…
I work currently as a houdini particle effects artist in AA games. For cutscenes and houdini engine as well as multiple pass compositing. I use mainly VEX code whenever i can as it runs often twice as efficient and also it's more intuitive. Things like vop switch conditions can be written as "if" statements. And deletion of points and noise deformers is also sped up. I've asked chatgpt3 for days to write me a code or make the code better. It always always messes it up or makes up syntax or makes fake functions that have never existed. Complex issues aren't as easy as telling it to code a basic port scanner in python. I'm super let down by AI right now. Also some workflows aren't even on the web I've noticed. Like creating an efficient vortex for water sim using the gravity forces from normal orientations instead of velocities. It's unable to build things like this often as well.
The shape is called an "Imperial Star Destroyer Point Cloud" :-)
This 3d shape surely looks like some Julia code.
There are many shapes to be made using fractals, that looks like of of them.
A shape constructed from a mathematical formula.
the last thing it made looks like muscle fibers!! great vid
Every software program on the planet needs to build ChatGPT right into their software.
yah dude
your a genius
so imagine when it starts accidentally creating "genius" level architecture for a tiny home, an RV, or an , car/vehicle/scooter design, even AI generated molecules for medicines
I don't have time to mess around with it now but a fun thing to play with would be to have it generate BVH mocap files of the motions you want that are targeted at a standard Rigify rig. You would need to specify the FPS, but the bot should be able to generate everything else. BVH files are just plain text files so it should be easy to cut-n-paste to a file. I'd be interested to see if it could generate accurate animations for the human, dog, and bird rigs.
Since it's a language model the outputs for full meshes and animation are very limited. This could change in the future though, since people are constantly discovering new uses for ChatGPT
10:45 I think it is a Quaternion Julia Fractal.
from PIL import Image
# Image size
width, height = 800, 600
# Create a blank image with a white background
img = Image.new('RGB', (width, height), (255, 255, 255))
# The complex plane
real_min, real_max = -2, 1
imag_min, imag_max = -1, 1
real_range = real_max - real_min
imag_range = imag_max - imag_min
# Maximum number of iterations
max_iter = 256
# Generate the Mandelbrot set
for x in range(width):
for y in range(height):
# Map pixel position to complex number
c = complex(real_min + x * real_range / (width - 1), imag_min + y * imag_range / (height - 1))
# Iterate until the point is outside of the circle with radius 2
z = 0
for i in range(max_iter):
if abs(z) > 2:
break
# Compute the next iteration
z = z**2 + c
# Color the point based on the number of iterations
img.putpixel((x, y), (i % 8 * 32, i % 16 * 16, i % 32 * 8))
# Save the image
img.save('mandelbrot.png')
This python code was generated by chatGPT very quickly. It took me far longer to get it to run though, but ... GPT told me how - which was even more impressive !
Chat GPT is overwhelmed. Too many people joined and now I cant ask my question
Thanks, maybe I will use this someday :)
What a amazing way this is .... !!
I feel I'm lucky to meet such video.
I had ChatGPT generate multithreaded code to crack passwords with Python, this thing is great because you can ask it to simply generate the routine you imagined and then implement it however you see fit!
If kind of looks like a point cloud that they create for particle collision simulations :D
You make a great point! By giving ChatGPT a clear set of instructions that you know should make sense within the context of the application you're using, it will usually generate a better script.
@@StrayCreations not necessarily better, but it will guide you on the steps you need to take!
Good stuff. The AI searches a massive database - the key strength of computing - and selects the most relevant results. It relay those results based on parameters defined by clever algorithms. The final result can be relayed as sentences, numerical values, or even programming language, in this case, or any combination of the three - just as it was DESIGNED to do. This is impressive stuff, no doubt, but let's not forget the human element in this story!
The most fascinating aspect of this AI era is observing how WE(the end user) ascribe "person" or "agency" to AI. It's like we are so entranced by the illusion of a consciousness on the other side of the 'monitor,' that we are seemingly unable to credit the ACTUAL mind or consciousness behind it all - the human entity! This propensity to ascribe metaphysical qualities(knowledge, emotion, conscience) to non-living entities will only get stronger as the technology improves, and the illusion becomes more profound.
If there's ever a "singularity," it wouldn't happen because AI eventually took over... it will be because we WILLINGLY gave up our humanity, and chose to *honor the created entity(AI), rather than the creator(Man)*. The irony is that this wouldn't be the first time we've committed THAT offense. We've done it with our own Creator.
Came for GPT. Liked & Sub'd because you're a handsome barstool and this was a 10/10 video.
I was using it to write a simple Circuit board material, it was missing a few steps and didn't account for the right properties, i can see its usefulness if you stuck or have an error as it will help you find the problem esp. if your using scripts.
very good, nicely structured video and magnificent hair my guy 👌
It's a shame that is completely overloaded now... I haven't been able to get into ChatGPT for that last week or so... which sucks cause I am a new game designer and it was really helping me to understand how to program and create a game I am working on...
Wow, incredible
Just a slight correction. It takes many million dollars to train chatGPT and it will not be constantly updated due to that. But the next iteration GPT 4 will be many many folds better than this current version 3.5
Not sure, having many characters , doesn’t mean it 100 times better, but lets see.
you can "continue" training the dataset without starting from scratch.
Its updating every Week ! - you can see small text below prompt like 'ChatGPT Jan 9 Version'.
I wonder if the funky shape at the end is a example of a fractal function that has each cross section slice as a 2d fractal that then modulates a value as it goes from right to left out up or down or however it calculated the shape. Maybe even by rotation. It's kinda like an MRI maybe
Which everything does it exactly change?
While tech advancement is good... it also takes away man's intuitive thinking and problem solving neurons.... when your brain stops working and completely relies on a machine, it deprecates those neurons it'd use ordinarily to addresss such problems... that is why, even with the plenty advanced cinematography tools (camera, rendering machines, realtimes... etc) yet the quality of movies we see now are dropping faster than the tools are growing... we only still appreciate good films from Old seasoned directors and filmmakers who still use traditional skills to make better use of the modern equipment...
no , its because it was the stuff we experienced at our younger age.
GenZ just cant relate to it.
I'm currently asking chatgpt to tell me how to make a better version of chatgpt lmao. It's actually working 😂
The abstract object looks like a a mineral/rock natural crystal type formation. I bet there are some natural minerals formed in this way. Obviously not using chat GPT and Blender, but how the Mandelbrot is seen in most of nature and formed from the Mandelbrot formation/pattern.
chat gpt wrote for me this "operator was introduced in Blender 2.82, so if you are using an older version of Blender, it will not be available."
10:18 maybe related to the burning ship but 3d?? idk
Thanks!
Great video, very interesting. :)
Glad you liked it!
last shape is a klingon mother ship hahahaha nice f video mate well done
Thanks dude
AI was a meh thing even 5 years ago, BUT this year it has done some amazing things! can't wait to see whats happening in the years to come!
Ai 5 years ago was defeating top players in complex games, generation of images and all that stuff, dunno how that is meh
I would say that the last one you created that you don't know the name of looks organic, like muscle tissue or plant-like. Crazy! (BTW-maybe try asking ChatGPT what it's called-lol).
Most of the things mentioned here can be done in Houdini. Most of them faster than you can type out the text for ChatGPT
Make a video about Houdini then. We're here because it's Blender and Blender is what we use.
@@DonHall666 chill my comment isn't against Blender, it's more about ChatGPT hindering the learning process. It's a tool not a one size fits all solution
@@eftorq it sounds like you're too chill over there. Put up some proof, show us how Houdini can do what you say in a shorter time. Teach us the things you think this tool is taking away from our learning. Otherwise you're really just answering a question nobody's asked.
that is help full
That weird one reminds me of a 3d fractal (Mandelbulber?) I saw called the Burning Ship or something to that effect.
You can also use × instead of x
I've been tried this before (making fractal object such as Mandelbulb), but never got a result. When I apply the script, the object is either disappear or the script is error. I think, even though we only writing a prompt, it is necessary to write detail, specific, and clear writing. I only wrote "write phyton script to make a Mandelbulb model in Blender". So, I guess it's not detail enough.
After 1-2 years.
ChatGPT, make my full model with UV, and textures.
ChatGPT: Sure! Here you model file with all textures. (Giving singl file)
Hopefully, someday, artists won't even be needed - and Ai can create everything for us. That's be so cool.
I dont understand why you would wish for that, creativity, artistic expression and emotions are pretty deep human assets. I assume you are some game developer or similar and want to save yourself some coin. The statement itself has a sad message if you ask me, but i understand the excitement. Getting created whatever you come up with sounds fascinating indeed.
@@OxidativeDekarbOx Soon, everything will be Ai. No one will need to create anything every again. Good no?
@@RampantDaydream i Mean... I think it should ease things and assist. If it replaces core human traits, which in my opinion it cant do, then if we think it can, what would be left for us than pure boredom? If we can have everything within seconds, its like playing a game with cheatcodes. Then its fun for 5 minutes and after that we lose complete the point of it all. Whats your take on this? Just came to my head
@@OxidativeDekarbOx Yeah! Amazing. A game with cheat codes sounds like a time-saver.
Nice hairdo! (coming from a random guy whose hair is disappearing already LoLs) Reminds me of the movie in the 80's "Back To The Future" or is it just me or you're camera settings was also set to 80's style quality?
Thanks hahaha. My apologies for the poor camera quality, I keep recording these at night with terrible lighting. I should invest in some lights.
@@StrayCreations I think camera quality looks great. It feels like a Quentin Tarantino movie.
I swear blender youtubers all have the same voice
Great video!!
Thank you!
Smart and REALLY Great hair!!!
Impressive 😵💫
I'm gonna paste it and see whats gonna happen
--Ad poped up
Oh god... "Recently this AI called, 'GPTChat' came out"..... LOLLLLLLLL
Amazing, but doesn't works for me :( errors. I'm gonna wait, maybe update is needed. I just tried "create a cube"
Wat an Amaiizienng Dutch Accent You Haff Sur
Gotta love chatgpt
BRAVO !!!