Are All Machine Guns Legal Now?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 พ.ย. 2024
  • JOIN THE FIGHT: donate.gunowne...
    AMAZON STORE: amzn.to/2H7Lq6Y
    PATREON: / iv8888
    GUITARSENAL: / guitarsenal
    IV8888 ON THE WEB: www.iraqvetera...
    SHIRTS & ACCESSORIES: ballisticink.c...
    FACEBOOK: / iraqveteran8888
    INSTAGRAM: @iraqveteran8888_offical
    TWITTER: @iraqveteran8888
    AMAZON NOTICE: As an Amazon Associate, Iraqveteran8888 earns from qualifying purchases.
    DISCLAIMER: Our videos are strictly for documentary, educational, and entertainment purposes only. All shooting is performed on state-approved firing ranges under the supervision of trained professionals. Imitation or the use of any acts depicted in these videos is solely AT YOUR OWN RISK. All work on firearms should be carried out by a licensed individual, and all state and federal rules apply to such. We (including TH-cam) will not be held liable for any injury to yourself or damage to your firearms resulting from attempting anything shown in any of our videos. We do not endorse any specific product, and this video is not an attempt to sell you a good or service. Iraqveteran8888 is not a gun store and DOES NOT sell or deal in firearms. Such a practice is heavily regulated and subject to applicable laws. Iraqveteran8888 DOES NOT sell parts, magazines, or firearms. We are not instructing our viewers on how to modify firearms, accessories, or otherwise to change their basic legal function. These videos are free to watch, and if anyone attempts to charge for this video, notify us immediately. By viewing or flagging this video, you are acknowledging the above.
    Fair Use: In the rare instance we include someone else’s footage, it is covered in Fair Use for Documentary and Educational purposes to drive commentary and allow freedom of speech.
    Copyright 2023, 88 Industries, LLC

ความคิดเห็น • 853

  • @Iraqveteran8888
    @Iraqveteran8888  หลายเดือนก่อน +161

    *I'm getting an odd little audio anomaly on my end. Let me know if you hear it too. Thanks.

    • @Iraqveteran8888
      @Iraqveteran8888  หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      I might have left my dehumidifier on! ☠

    • @Sommyie
      @Sommyie หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Tooo much gain

    • @bw1819
      @bw1819 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      I don’t mind a little “white noise” 😅

    • @fokker1138
      @fokker1138 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      The audio feels like a throw back to the days at Moss Gun and Pawn.

    • @lacrossed55
      @lacrossed55 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@Iraqveteran8888 yeah sounds like a fan

  • @texasforever5776
    @texasforever5776 หลายเดือนก่อน +579

    Abolish the ATF.

    • @MichaelAMyers1957
      @MichaelAMyers1957 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      All the alphabet gangs..

    • @curtistignor3966
      @curtistignor3966 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The ATF is soooo important. They stop all the boot leg alcohol ( oh wait, there is none) illegal cigarettes ( oh wait, that only happens in New Tax York) and Fire arms our constitutional right.

  • @Trapphausmusic
    @Trapphausmusic หลายเดือนก่อน +377

    Suppressors should be available off the shelf as a safety tool. Millions would be saved in hearing aid insurance claims.

    • @vocalcover3807
      @vocalcover3807 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Ear plugs bud

    • @Trapphausmusic
      @Trapphausmusic หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@vocalcover3807 Ear plugs and muffs don’t help much when you’re shooting a .223

    • @delh.773
      @delh.773 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      @Trapphausmusic but but but but! Everybody knows that the instant you attach a suppressor to a gun, then the gun becomes quieter than a mouse fart and deadlier than a gene modified assassin. People have been known to take out dozens of people at one time with just 4 or 5 bullets!! I've seen it happen before in the movies.

    • @vocalcover3807
      @vocalcover3807 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@Trapphausmusic I’ve shot 300 win mag with buds and they work just fine to muffle loud sounds and allow you to hear ambient noise as well. Perhaps you need a class on how to pinch them and then stuff them in your ear.

    • @vocalcover3807
      @vocalcover3807 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Trapphausmusic 300 win mag with a muzzle break*

  • @reesej.nelson9148
    @reesej.nelson9148 หลายเดือนก่อน +960

    GOVERNMENT IS GAY (1 like=one🖕🏻for ATF)

    • @capitalexpenditures21
      @capitalexpenditures21 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      And they’re proud of it. 💀

    • @reesej.nelson9148
      @reesej.nelson9148 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      @@capitalexpenditures21 “IM GAY AND IM PROUD”- federal agents

    • @yakikadafi745
      @yakikadafi745 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@reesej.nelson9148 as they march to the gay bar

    • @OnlyDegenerateWorkAtYouTube
      @OnlyDegenerateWorkAtYouTube หลายเดือนก่อน

      Says the subhuman...

    • @AndsoIdid
      @AndsoIdid หลายเดือนก่อน

      Like farming is GAY

  • @isaachousley325
    @isaachousley325 หลายเดือนก่อน +184

    Those old timers with worn out m16a1s are sweating at possibility of value of them dropping 90-95% percent

    • @tpfrk8977
      @tpfrk8977 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      We should start seeing machine gun prices fall

    • @tardactual8791
      @tardactual8791 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Good.

    • @noahmcabee2534
      @noahmcabee2534 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Lol good

    • @memeier9894
      @memeier9894 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It would still take 10 years...

    • @joshuaanderson7511
      @joshuaanderson7511 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      People don't seem to understand that if machine guns are unbanned, the pre ban ones are going to retain most of their value. There isn't going to be an influx of old m16a1s into the market, supply and demand, little supply, little demand currently. If unbanned, the supply would remain the same and demand would change little, because people still want to buy old machine guns as collectors.

  • @johnb.6468
    @johnb.6468 หลายเดือนก่อน +595

    Abolish the NFA

    • @Chris_FMS_Redfield
      @Chris_FMS_Redfield หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      At least the Hughes amendment. At least you can own new-production NFA items with a tax stamp and waiting period except for MGs.

    • @HerrCobra_762
      @HerrCobra_762 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      And the atf

    • @DriftLifePSN
      @DriftLifePSN หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@HerrCobra_762yeah! My cigars are too expensive

    • @SergioGarcia-lu5yo
      @SergioGarcia-lu5yo หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Bla bla bla.
      Do something about it.
      Yall wimps are all bark no bite

    • @genericordinaryname8553
      @genericordinaryname8553 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How do we go about doing this?​@@SergioGarcia-lu5yo

  • @michaeltomsa-musatin
    @michaeltomsa-musatin หลายเดือนก่อน +116

    Judge John Bruns said it best "possession of a machine gun is a constitutional right" period.

    • @18B_Madder
      @18B_Madder หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Don't kid yourselves, it's not the machinegun, it's who else has the machineguns. That said, if our 'paramilitary' ATF, DHS, USMS, FBI (To list a few) have machineguns, APC's, SWAT gear and weapons, so should the people.
      But I will say something sweet... If it ever comes to, we have enough battle-hardened U.S Military veterans that can always bring Iraq and Afghanistan to the home front and give these bastards lessons of war.
      They can take our guns away, but not without the cost of a lot of lives on both sides, especially theirs.

    • @michaeltomsa-musatin
      @michaeltomsa-musatin หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@18B_Madder Au contraire, monsieur, you do not know who has machine guns. :) Neither do they

  • @robg8433
    @robg8433 หลายเดือนก่อน +290

    Machine guns have always been legal... It's the tyrannical overlords that have made "rules" hoping we would comply...🤣🤣🤣

    • @RASAllusion
      @RASAllusion หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      Every gun is a machine. ;)

    • @firefly9838
      @firefly9838 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

      Make the feds scared again

    • @Mustang6971
      @Mustang6971 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They have been legal but there red tape to get registered pre 86 machine guns, and there's a lot of red tape to get post 86 machine guns and dealer sample mgs. And you need super deep pockets especially for transferable MGs.

    • @Featherless1
      @Featherless1 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@Mustang6971😂 register machine guns... LMFAO!

    • @capitalexpenditures21
      @capitalexpenditures21 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@RASAllusionHide your dog. 🤣

  • @jdg9999
    @jdg9999 หลายเดือนก่อน +171

    I'm not even American, but a simple look at the Constitution seems to show the Founding Fathers specifically intended for "weapons of war" to be legal, i.e. the right to bear arms was for the purpose of being able to take part in military conflict, always been confused by how they snuck a ban on automatic weapons through.

    • @karlheinzvonkroemann2217
      @karlheinzvonkroemann2217 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      FDR the 1934 NFA (National Firearms Act)

    • @noneshere
      @noneshere หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      Exactly, the US government is not even constitutionally allowed to keep a standing army.
      Only a Navy .

    • @joshmalcom89
      @joshmalcom89 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      ​@@nonesherenailed it ..Congress has to vote every 2 years to maintain any army .. they violated that out the gate

    • @nathanielyoungman4454
      @nathanielyoungman4454 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Only 18 years after they started taxing our income under a foreign company

    • @portersorensen8814
      @portersorensen8814 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@karlheinzvonkroemann2217 don’t forget Hughes ammendment to the FOPA

  • @RASAllusion
    @RASAllusion หลายเดือนก่อน +248

    Caetano v Mass - "ALL BEARABLE ARMS ARE PROTECTED." It doesn't get any simpler than that.

    • @nebelwerfer199
      @nebelwerfer199 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      And look what Mass just did.

    • @caymenmonday4843
      @caymenmonday4843 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Including cannons

    • @joenunya8449
      @joenunya8449 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@RASAllusion MINIGUN
      Not that I could more than a millisecond of ammo

    • @andrewtanczyk4009
      @andrewtanczyk4009 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@joenunya8449yah. I have a new reason to become a millionaire now. I want to waste a whole lot of ammunition now. 😅

    • @bluebadger83
      @bluebadger83 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@caymenmonday4843already legal to own

  • @robgrey6183
    @robgrey6183 หลายเดือนก่อน +178

    40 million have swarmed across the border and do what they please, without consequence.
    Why are Americans still talking about playing by the rules?

    • @Christ-is-King-
      @Christ-is-King- หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      It’s called being domesticated.

    • @Featherless1
      @Featherless1 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      I stopped being a law-abiding citizen when America fell under tyrannical rule....

    • @carlosspeicywiener7018
      @carlosspeicywiener7018 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      If you don't like it, you can just leave

    • @Featherless1
      @Featherless1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@carlosspeicywiener7018
      THE WOOD'S AIN'T SAFE!..

    • @bleu_chzst924
      @bleu_chzst924 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      @@carlosspeicywiener7018so can all the illegal immigrants 😊

  • @resiststatism8962
    @resiststatism8962 หลายเดือนก่อน +125

    CRS Firearms needs to hear about this...

    • @Expatris
      @Expatris หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      I'm sure his legal team is already aware and filing an amended appeal.

    • @MagicalTrout
      @MagicalTrout หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      The the guy wasn't even selling machine guns...

    • @MrFlathead45
      @MrFlathead45 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He's a punk. He would have pushed it much farther if the ATF had not stepped it.
      I have talked with some of his family and he was ... Well. Let's just say. He's not the hero you want to get behind. And I'll leave it at that.

    • @Jonbo117
      @Jonbo117 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      ​@@MrFlathead45 doesnt change the fact that he did nothing to violate anyone elses life, liberty or property. Therefore, a crime cannot exist. Free my boy Matt

    • @mrpilkington9710
      @mrpilkington9710 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrFlathead45 The ATF are domestic terrorists act accordingly

  • @Angl0sax0nknight
    @Angl0sax0nknight หลายเดือนก่อน +255

    The government hates competition in regards to violence. This ONLY applies to the defendant. You can guarantee it will be appealed.

    • @DataGeek903
      @DataGeek903 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Don't steal...
      The government hates competition...

    • @abracing199
      @abracing199 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      I don't think you can appeal a non guilty verdict can you? That would be double jeopardy.

    • @SouthernDestinations47
      @SouthernDestinations47 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      No that is not the case.
      And yes @iraqveteran8888 that is double jeopardy.
      A non guilty verdict can only be appealed if a judge decides against a jury’s guilty verdict but those cases are extremely rare.

    • @Angl0sax0nknight
      @Angl0sax0nknight หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@SouthernDestinations47 don’t think a not guilty verdict by a jury is ever appealable. In this case it was motion to dismiss, which is appealable.

    • @zues287
      @zues287 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The government hates competition in regards to ALL CRIME. In the words of the great Ron Paul "Don't steal. The government hates competition."

  • @SmoothMP5
    @SmoothMP5 หลายเดือนก่อน +193

    I would be happy to loose the value of my transferable HK sear to be able to get most of my guns converted to select fire.
    F the money!!!
    Real American Freedom🇺🇸

    • @steve03260
      @steve03260 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      And I will happily standing by to buy it.

    • @DeliciousBoi
      @DeliciousBoi หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@steve03260You can buy one for $100 off of HKparts, uncircumcised and legally no more questionable than an M16 Auto Sear.

    • @DeliciousBoi
      @DeliciousBoi หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@steve03260​​ You can buy one for $100 off of HKparts, they're legally no more questionable than an M16 LPK.

    • @DeliciousBoi
      @DeliciousBoi หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@steve03260You can buy one for $100 off of HK Parts, they're legally no more questionable than an M16 LPK.

    • @Hunter76251
      @Hunter76251 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Can I buy yours?

  • @Mr.SeanCombs
    @Mr.SeanCombs หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    What are the odds, I just found all the guns I lost in a boating accident

    • @fortheloveofnoise
      @fortheloveofnoise หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Glad you finally rented that scuba diving gear.

  • @Yamcha27
    @Yamcha27 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    The question shouldn’t be “Can we have machine guns now?” And should be “Why should we recognize these idiots authority?”

    • @chasemartin5777
      @chasemartin5777 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Funnily enough, part of the reason so many people recognize their authority is because they have machine guns.

  • @numbuh_uno
    @numbuh_uno หลายเดือนก่อน +131

    This would make a hilarious day at the local outdoor ranges the day after this pans out....all the guys that magically have MGs all of a sudden 😂

    • @goodcitizen64
      @goodcitizen64 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well it isn't rocket science!! Lol. You've got to love redneck engineering! 😂

    • @markdsm-5157
      @markdsm-5157 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      only means the government can't ban firearms, gun ranges can do whatever they want. I suspect the ones that allow full auto will be rare, including state and federal ranges owned. 50 cals are legal but almost everyone bans the use of them on the range and that hasn't been challenged.

    • @numbuh_uno
      @numbuh_uno หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@markdsm-5157 you may be right. One of my local ones allows for 50s. I personally hate full auto and prefer burst fire at max, unless it's a SMG...in that case let er rip!!

    • @skylerleclair3288
      @skylerleclair3288 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      ​@markdsm-5157 the only reason they ban 50s is the backstop isn't enough to stop rounds from it and it might mess up the backstop

    • @termiterasin
      @termiterasin หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@markdsm-5157 When will the government make private businesses comply with the constitution? They don't have rights to ignore it.

  • @reesej.nelson9148
    @reesej.nelson9148 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    Very happy to see Eric got in great shape now man. Good for you bro

    • @MichaelAMyers1957
      @MichaelAMyers1957 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He needs to get off the 👃❄️

  • @oo7-ro6bu
    @oo7-ro6bu หลายเดือนก่อน +159

    The government has no authority to make any laws or regulations against arms per the constitution of the United States!

    • @tugalord
      @tugalord หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      And the 2nd Ammendment is not what grants gun rights, its only what protects it (we in France let our rights be stripped away by the 3rd republic and the Vichy régime (where you had the worst gun control in french history), aswell as the 4th and 5th republics.

    • @MultiTelan
      @MultiTelan หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Yet they still do it. And they'll continue doing so until they are stopped by the force of the people that the constitution requires of us.

    • @oldirtyshinobi420
      @oldirtyshinobi420 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Agreed! Someone should let them know…

    • @user-oy9zy4ds9m
      @user-oy9zy4ds9m หลายเดือนก่อน

      ATF: might makes right

    • @bribbertyjibbert
      @bribbertyjibbert หลายเดือนก่อน

      Correct. Nor against drugs.

  • @orenthalsimpson
    @orenthalsimpson หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    If I could legally convert my 10/22 to be full auto I'd be a happy boy

    • @richardprice5978
      @richardprice5978 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      convert my 10/22 to be full auto I'd be a happy boy
      birdie/rabbit/sporting at the range like skeet? if so welcomed
      i still like 1880's Winchester 21 but it's still good fun to compete against other people/setup-types

  • @moorecav213
    @moorecav213 หลายเดือนก่อน +128

    Matt Hoover is still in prison

    • @anomaly864
      @anomaly864 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

      Free CRS!!

    • @BeltFedSelfDefense
      @BeltFedSelfDefense หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Free CRS!

    • @MrFlathead45
      @MrFlathead45 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He's not the hero you want to get behind.... Believe me. Just saying.

    • @moorecav213
      @moorecav213 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@MrFlathead45 he's not my hero, just saying how stupid and corrupt the system is

    • @mccoma11
      @mccoma11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@MrFlathead45 I don't believe you. If you have an argument here, say it. Simply saying "Trust me, bro" doesn't cut it.

  • @GeoffryWK
    @GeoffryWK หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    Before the 1934 NFA, you could buy a Thompson Sub-machine gun for $200 and have it shipped to your home. And THAT is where the ATF came up with the $200 Tax Stamp.

  • @valhallarchist9511
    @valhallarchist9511 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

    I'll start giving them some credit when the fully repeal the Patriot Act

    • @crocswithsocks8496
      @crocswithsocks8496 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I hear you. However that could happen on paper, in reality it is yesterday’s technologies and abilities. Sorry….we are always 20yrs behind!

    • @valhallarchist9511
      @valhallarchist9511 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@crocswithsocks8496 you're not wrong.

  • @kaiserc2471
    @kaiserc2471 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    My thought is the judge has a neighbor who wont stop bragging about his registered machine gun collection going up in value, and this judge was singing happy tunes the entire time he was drafting and formalizing his ruling.

  • @1bornsurvivor
    @1bornsurvivor หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I hope that we get our right to own machine guns restored in this country. I remember trying to get the adults in my family to buy machine guns before the ban took effect in 1986. They didn't because nobody wanted to listen to what a teenager was saying. I want and deserve the same opportunity to buy a machine gun that my father and grandfather had. Better yet, I want and deserve the same opportunity to buy a machine gun without an unconstitutional tax that my ancestors had before 1934.

  • @JakeT9944
    @JakeT9944 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Hey Eric not sure if you've been keeping up with all the Sonoran desert institute drama but if you haven't I would take a look! There is a reason that a lot of gun tubers have been dropping them as a sponsor.

    • @nebelwerfer199
      @nebelwerfer199 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not MAC

    • @TheAsheybabe89
      @TheAsheybabe89 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@nebelwerfer199 not a surprise that mister Hungarian SVD theft would do some unscrupulous shit for a dollar

  • @Akac3sh
    @Akac3sh หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Nothing is illegal if you don’t get caught I’ve had a full auto ak since the 90s

    • @Tony27654
      @Tony27654 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      A true American I see

    • @joaopedrobaggio4475
      @joaopedrobaggio4475 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      This is the spirit.

    • @peternorton5648
      @peternorton5648 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      Smart enough to have one yet dumb enough to toss that info out on the internet. 👍good job bro.

    • @bondjamesbond2849
      @bondjamesbond2849 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Lucky you, I lost mine in a boating accident.

    • @hanzgrueber145
      @hanzgrueber145 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bondjamesbond2849the great boating accident of oolala lake

  • @MARCUSROGERS21
    @MARCUSROGERS21 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    I remember when glocks had built-in switches on the slide

    • @Yamaha38XCRacer
      @Yamaha38XCRacer หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Remember when you could order switches easy as anything else, I do and lost mine in a boating accident if anyone cares!!!!!

    • @modus_operandi2508
      @modus_operandi2508 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Only the G18

    • @Radvous
      @Radvous หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      When? Never have except G18

    • @modus_operandi2508
      @modus_operandi2508 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MARCUSROGERS21 the switch on the slide ? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣obviously you've never owned a firearm !!!

    • @cubixzz831
      @cubixzz831 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@modus_operandi2508Hes talking about the fire select switch thats on the side of the glock 18. Doesnt take much brain to figure that out

  • @popo_53
    @popo_53 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    "Shall not be infringed" is pretty straight forward.

  • @hardlylivin6602
    @hardlylivin6602 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    And here I am focusing on the "low hanging fruit" approach to dismantling the NFA. Getting MG's before SBR's or suppressors would be a welcome but outright hilarious surprise.

    • @rossrochlitz9645
      @rossrochlitz9645 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      MGs have no barrel restriction so you would get SBRs & SBS when you get MGs.

    • @hardlylivin6602
      @hardlylivin6602 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@rossrochlitz9645 That’s only if they leave the MG definition in the NFA. If they remove it entirely, the caliber and barrel length exemptions that they have will also be removed.

    • @rustythefoxcoon5143
      @rustythefoxcoon5143 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's actually easier. If all easily converted to auto guns count, let me ask you what it takes to mod your G17 frame into an auto switch on the slide.
      Oh wait, 2 minutes in the parking lot outside the pawnshop with it in your hand no frame mods and it's auto. So that makes all Glocks by definition a machine gun because it's easily converted.
      Glock is one of the most common guns. Thus one of the most common guns for civilians and police, not to mention criminals and feds, IS A MACHINE PISTOL. Done. It's not to be touched by the NFA at all! No tax stamp needed.

  • @Expatris
    @Expatris หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Since it seems like this is a Post-86 MG issue I would imagine the ruling would be to vacate the Hughes Amendment. Which means that Post-86 MG's are on the menu.
    And if I remember correctly the Hughes Amendment added suppressors to the NFA as well.

    • @charlesmckinley29
      @charlesmckinley29 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      No, silencers were part of the original 1934 NFA.

    • @Expatris
      @Expatris หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@charlesmckinley29
      You're wrong, but whatever.

    • @ChristianGunNut2001
      @ChristianGunNut2001 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Hughes is a part of the broader Firearm Owners Protection Act (FOPA), hence it being called the "Hughes Amendment." And as far as suppressors go, they were already on the NFA from the very beginning. Individual parts weren't on the NFA until FOPA changed the legal definition of a silencer to include said individual parts (such as wipes).

    • @wesleyroberts7119
      @wesleyroberts7119 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@Expatris He's right. Silencers were a part of the original NFA 1934. The only thing the Hughes amendment did was forbid the manufacture and registration of new machine guns. Nothing to do with silencers.

    • @charlesmckinley29
      @charlesmckinley29 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@wesleyroberts7119 thank you I posted from the ATF website and it disappeared.

  • @thomasringuette-lr5el
    @thomasringuette-lr5el หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Hi and thank you for your service, I can answer that question for Massachusetts it's absolutely no. We just got hit with one of the biggest gun laws in history. We're down to lever actions, bolt actions pump shotguns and a few semi auto shotguns. We are fighting back but we need a lot of help.

    • @scotty362100
      @scotty362100 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Same in Illinois - videos like this are just stupid!

    • @theultimatemadman1126
      @theultimatemadman1126 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@scotty362100 At least we still have handguns and concealed carry those are the most important. Though I disagree with the ban a rifle is not really the best weapon for home defense due to over penetration. I feel like pistol carbines and shotguns are better for that application. Though we lost pistol carbines as well.

    • @danielmcneilan6287
      @danielmcneilan6287 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Compliance is a bow to communism ​@@theultimatemadman1126

    • @nathanielyoungman4454
      @nathanielyoungman4454 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So anyways, I started watering the tree of liberty

    • @c.j.rogers2422
      @c.j.rogers2422 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No SxS or O/U?

  • @DavidA20200
    @DavidA20200 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    I wish they were. We will get there if we stay on offense! We didn't lose our rights overnight and we won't get it back overnight either.

    • @jasonshults368
      @jasonshults368 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      You're wrong. We did lose them literally overnight, and we literally can get them back just as quickly.

  • @Moetown1986
    @Moetown1986 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    The best part about the idea of machine guns becoming a normal thing is watching a bunch of "just as good" gun builds fall apart within a few mags.

  • @fa-ajn9881
    @fa-ajn9881 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Started watching you a TON in 5th grade. For whatever reason at some point stopped. Thank you for all you’ve taught me and helping me fulfill one of my passions throughout my life.

  • @copeboi7714
    @copeboi7714 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    It’s about time we get our rights back. Flimsy pistol braces aren’t safe and a grip that doesn’t allow you to get a proper purchase on the gun is also unsafe.

  • @TimMayville
    @TimMayville หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    😂 They've never been off the menu howevrr, They've only been overpriced down in my "Ramien Noodle" bank limitations... 😂

    • @Rattys
      @Rattys หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No U.S. civilian has been able to purchase a new one for themselves in over 40 years. That's pretty off the menu when only 60+ year olds can remember getting new full autos.

  • @rangerandrogue
    @rangerandrogue หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    Please fix audio...and drop SDI as a sponsor.

    • @tomwinterfishing9065
      @tomwinterfishing9065 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      You do realise that sponsors are basically like advertisements on TV. It doesn’t mean the star of the show uses the product. They do allow the viewer to have something to watch though

    • @rangerandrogue
      @rangerandrogue หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@tomwinterfishing9065 I hope he sees this, bro.

    • @AgentWonderbread45
      @AgentWonderbread45 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Could hear him just fine.

    • @MichaelAMyers1957
      @MichaelAMyers1957 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What's wrong with SDI ? I don't know much about them other than seeing them as youtube sponsors

    • @alexgray7329
      @alexgray7329 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MichaelAMyers1957they don’t actually give you much gunsmithing experience and have a lot of conflicting information and misinformation in their own textbooks

  • @nickschroeder7112
    @nickschroeder7112 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This format is awesome please keep doing these. and for some reason… it gives me vibes from the need for speed movie and “The De Leon” radio and race host 😂

  • @billjensen6216
    @billjensen6216 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great info as always, Eric. Thank you for the updates and info you always provide us with.

  • @samizdat113
    @samizdat113 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Saw your tweet. Based AF

  • @joshualandry3160
    @joshualandry3160 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Lets be clear about one thing. This case would not touch the NFA. It would simply remove the ban on new machine guns. In my opinion that is absolutely great for a short term win. A new $300 full auto AR is a net win.

  • @Frank-uw5xq
    @Frank-uw5xq หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good to see you back brother 🫡🇺🇸

  • @jasrobsny
    @jasrobsny หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    The govt needs to back off restricting any kind of firearm. They are specifically forbidden from touching the fringes of anyone's right to bear arms or access ammunition.

  • @ij1376
    @ij1376 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I don't understand when in history we forgot the second amendment. We just magically started making laws against machine guns, suppressors, "assault rifles" even though they aren't legally defined, magazines that have useful ammo capacities, and _conceal carrying_ even. When did this happen?

    • @dragonhealer7588
      @dragonhealer7588 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Between the prohibition era and Hollywood. . .

    • @tomgarrett9232
      @tomgarrett9232 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I think it was a response to the violence during prohibition. Real gangsters (Capone & many others) were causing serious carnage in Chicago & other places. Alcohol got legalized, the gangsters went away, but the laws stayed.

    • @ij1376
      @ij1376 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tomgarrett9232 Thanks Capone, you gave us milk and took our guns. -_-

  • @maxdangle1
    @maxdangle1 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I thought everybody dropped SDI as a sponsor already.

  • @andrewtanczyk4009
    @andrewtanczyk4009 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    Yah, where in the 2nd Amendment does it say we can’t own automatic weapons?

    • @__Theta__
      @__Theta__ หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It does not say we cant own automatic weapons, in truth if we followed the constitution to its exact wording it would give every american the right to arm themselves in the same way the US Millitary can. If you have the money you would be able to purchase and bear it. In reality this would be a terrible idea now with the way millitary tech is progressing i mean think about it, your neighbor becomes a multi billionaire and is now in possession of an apache helicopter with hellfire missles. While that would be totally badass it kinda begs the question how would we allow people to own and carry automatic firearms and not run the risk of some idiot spraying with no regard for human life. We should be able to own them but how do we as a cohesive society prevent the idiotic and downright crazy individuals from abusing it

    • @nathanielyoungman4454
      @nathanielyoungman4454 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Those get weeded out. An armed society is a polite society

    • @cindileggitt1336
      @cindileggitt1336 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@__Theta__If we follow the wording "bear ARMS" then everyone owning arms should have to have at least two arms as well. 😂

    • @thejoe4975
      @thejoe4975 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@__Theta__ Because a deranged individual is going to be able to afford an Apache. Total straw man fallacy. "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"

    • @jddrafts
      @jddrafts หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@__Theta__ that less than a percent of the population is always going to be there. Not much you can do about it. Other than lock up people who haven't done anything yet because they are in the category of people that are more likely to do so or restrict access to tools for everyone because a percent or so of the population will misuse them. Not sure you can call yourself a free society going down either path. Regardless of how many lives going down either path saves. Maybe the tradeoff is worth it but call a spade a spade as they say.

  • @daleweller5193
    @daleweller5193 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    SCOTUS ruling is one thing, enforcing that rule is something else !

  • @Cr0wmagnum
    @Cr0wmagnum หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    We can only hope that this will work out for the people.

  • @robertcrawford3246
    @robertcrawford3246 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Imagine how much money you lost now that the NFA has been dissolved…

    • @Angl0sax0nknight
      @Angl0sax0nknight หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      It’s just dumb that an $80 worth of parts some how make something worth 35k

    • @hunterstanfield7100
      @hunterstanfield7100 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      @@Angl0sax0nknighti fear the rich folk that own big nfa collections will help keep them expensive

    • @wesleyroberts7119
      @wesleyroberts7119 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@hunterstanfield7100 I think there are fewer of those individuals then you expect.

  • @michaelleslie8424
    @michaelleslie8424 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    I love the idea of having a full automatic but there's no way I can afford one

    • @spider-spectre
      @spider-spectre หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Can make a home nuclear generator like a Floridian did when he founda forgotten nuke. Powered his house for years till he got caught.

    • @michaelleslie8424
      @michaelleslie8424 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@spider-spectre I can't afford that either

    • @AniwayasSong
      @AniwayasSong หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      I am now in the same boat. Owning one would be nice. Being able to FEED the thing, quite another challenge!

    • @joenunya8449
      @joenunya8449 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      ​@michaelleslie8424 if they weren't artificially rare because of the manufacturing bans, they would only be 100 dollars more than semi auto.
      The extra ammo is the deal breaker. Better have deep pockets.

    • @kekistaniattackhelicopter2242
      @kekistaniattackhelicopter2242 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      I think the 1986 act also forbids manufacturers from introducing new machineguns to market. But if possession of unregistered machineguns isn't illegal anymore, than you could turn your AR15 in to one yourself.

  • @J.Robinson_
    @J.Robinson_ หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the brake down brother . Good job

  • @tylerandersenandthegang
    @tylerandersenandthegang หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    We could only hope...

  • @MVPisME383
    @MVPisME383 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I hope so I'm tired of being a "nonconvicted"felon 😂😂

    • @c.j.rogers2422
      @c.j.rogers2422 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Beats the alternative. 😁

  • @LyonDen44
    @LyonDen44 หลายเดือนก่อน

    HE’S BACK!!

  • @timviering9559
    @timviering9559 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice work, Eric!

  • @Garbo38
    @Garbo38 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Shall not infringe.

  • @afroghair6793
    @afroghair6793 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Keep up the good work Eric.

  • @davidbaum9599
    @davidbaum9599 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Maybe silencers next ?

    • @tomwinterfishing9065
      @tomwinterfishing9065 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      We can’t have guns in the uk, but anyone can have as many silencers as they like🤷🏼

    • @RTS907
      @RTS907 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Suppressors should never have been regulated.

  • @caveman6141969
    @caveman6141969 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video brother!

  • @gregbaehring1656
    @gregbaehring1656 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for your content.

  • @sinclairpages
    @sinclairpages หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I feel that the SCOTUS will eventually say machine guns are legal BUT they can be TAXED and Registered due to their uniqueness.

    • @baghdaddy3531
      @baghdaddy3531 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That is the current law as it stands.

  • @NaturalMagi123
    @NaturalMagi123 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Marijuana was the favorite drug of George Washington’s troops and George grew lots of it

  • @bang2loud1981
    @bang2loud1981 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Lol you know RONALD REAGAN'S ghost is like Wtf I banned machine guns after 1986 in pure RINO fashion

    • @c.j.rogers2422
      @c.j.rogers2422 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Even the Saints made mistakes.

    • @CoolestDude38NC
      @CoolestDude38NC 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Reagan became a mild anti-gun President after his near death from his assassination attempt in 1980. His wife Nancy Reagan, became a quiet but very strong supporter of gun control after her husband was shot. Nancy Reagan supported the Brady Act...named for one of Reagan's cabinet members in 1980. Brady was severely maimed during Reagan's assassination attempt. It's not just Democrats that support gun control.

  • @DarkNightDreamer
    @DarkNightDreamer หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Sadly there would likely be several people who own transferrables that wouldn't want to see this happen. They have a ton of money in their collection and wouldn't want to see it lose its value.

    • @fortheloveofnoise
      @fortheloveofnoise หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      If it is historical, It wont lose value...if it is just some regular old Uzi...yes, it will lose value.

  • @momosgarage
    @momosgarage หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    What about the glock 18c or Škorpion vz. 61 or beretta 93r? All of which I think have existing produced quantities that could support a niche consumer market.
    Specifically offical production machine pistols that are military and LEO surplus now, some of which are Curio & Relics.

    • @c-w-h
      @c-w-h หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ill be lining up and finding a way to make them work with drones. 😂

    • @AutismIsUnstoppable
      @AutismIsUnstoppable หลายเดือนก่อน

      The glock switch already appears popular in some gun owning communities even though they are illegal currently so there is definitely demand.

    • @momosgarage
      @momosgarage หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AutismIsUnstoppable I meant offical production machine pistols that are basically military and LEO surplus now and will soon be considered C&R.

  • @kevinvaldez652
    @kevinvaldez652 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Glad to see you up and running Eric!

  • @bishoy01
    @bishoy01 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a dream! And I think some are finally starting to share it as well🎉

  • @AllAboutSurvival
    @AllAboutSurvival หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's interesting to see the current conversations about 2A rights pushing the limits of firearm regulations.

  • @machinegunclemons876
    @machinegunclemons876 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Paul Harrell🙏

  • @gerade-aus
    @gerade-aus หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cautiously optimistic. We've been promised the repeal of many laws and nothing changes. One exception the sunsetting of the '94 Omnibus Crime Bill in 2004 where GWB did not reinstate it. Fingers crossed.

  • @tubeonline629
    @tubeonline629 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The ammo manufacturers should be pushing for this.

  • @nicholasjacks9932
    @nicholasjacks9932 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    A medical cannabis card and a concealed carry card should not cancel each other out.

    • @bambam7979
      @bambam7979 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Why not ?

  • @xMNxGutz
    @xMNxGutz หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent content

  • @devonboyd533
    @devonboyd533 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Any laws restricting any type of arms is illegal
    Including carry permits

  • @2stroke747
    @2stroke747 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That would be amazing! We will just have to wait and see.

  • @krobros
    @krobros หลายเดือนก่อน

    Those are some seriously cool new glasses Brother.

  • @steviedirksen1938
    @steviedirksen1938 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I cant afford to shoot fast with any gun.

    • @c-w-h
      @c-w-h หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You know what...
      We need an ammo club. We all go fund a new ammo making company.
      No reason not too. There are enough of us to get things rolling. We can make ammo prices great again.

    • @steviedirksen1938
      @steviedirksen1938 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@c-w-h yes

    • @ForniteJeffReal
      @ForniteJeffReal หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@c-w-h Especially for steel case ammo. Should be rolling out for pennies.

    • @fortheloveofnoise
      @fortheloveofnoise หลายเดือนก่อน

      .22 LR enters the chat

  • @blakenoble4014
    @blakenoble4014 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey Eric, can you make a video explaining what a DMR is, what a Battle Rifle is, what an Assault Rifle is, and make a comparison of the three?

  • @resurrectiongarage1506
    @resurrectiongarage1506 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I don’t think we’re going to see machine guns at our local gun shop any time soon, but what would be nice is at least ditch the pre 86 rule and lower the tax stamp fee to something reasonable. Also have a much quicker process. Seriously they already check my criminal history when I buy a deer rifle, what more do they need to know for a machine gun? They could check my bank balance and know I am no threat because I couldn’t afford to feed a machine gun

  • @thetest8777
    @thetest8777 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    No machine until the supreme court rule on it

  • @VitalArms
    @VitalArms หลายเดือนก่อน

    You’re the best Eric! Would much rather hear your thoughts than 30 minutes of Armed Scholar recap his last ten videos that are all the same

  • @Rattys
    @Rattys หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow. We finally found a judge who can read and understand the phrase "shall not be infringed".

  • @ElohimYellow
    @ElohimYellow หลายเดือนก่อน

    0:24 funny thing is you can get better accuracy with an FRT trigger than a machine gun and still get the same result, plus no more dead fire casualtys.

  • @RealityCheckGA
    @RealityCheckGA หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Sunglasses are styling and profiling

  • @fabpoltronieri
    @fabpoltronieri หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So you guys may have in the future Machineguns as we always have had here in Switzerland. Hope it goes well for the US.. you may be in the future as free as we are in Switzerland guys.

    • @c.j.rogers2422
      @c.j.rogers2422 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What's your situation there on concealed or open carry? Any restrictions on type or quantity of firearms owned? Always keeping an eye out for alternatives!

  • @joshjohnson8584
    @joshjohnson8584 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Protecting yourself from people high on pot? Ayo what? Boots on the ground they are even less of a threat. This take sounds crazy.

  • @TheMhannah100
    @TheMhannah100 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've been amazed, happily, at how many states that have gone constitutional carry. I lived 20 years in Commiefornia and only knew 2 people that managed to get carry permits.

  • @toenails.
    @toenails. หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I will.carry and own whatever gun I want to whenever and whereever. PERIOD!!

  • @j.4300
    @j.4300 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love the waterbuger hat bud

  • @cdawson198600
    @cdawson198600 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They can't stop the signal, every 45min one can be born 😂 FTATF

  • @DarkAbilex
    @DarkAbilex หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yes.

  • @rhodie33
    @rhodie33 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video.

  • @cleanbeats07
    @cleanbeats07 หลายเดือนก่อน

    WHATABURGER!! I love being a Texan 💪

  • @mrshort2379
    @mrshort2379 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    non-NFA legal machineguns are a possibility, however I have my doubts

  • @SouthernDestinations47
    @SouthernDestinations47 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "Jake Stanley DeWilde appeals the district court’s dismissal of his pro se Second Amendment challenge to 18 U.S.C. § 922(o), which prohibits the transfer or possession of machineguns. The district court dismissed the action for lack of jurisdiction, concluding that DeWilde lacked standing. Alternatively, the district court concluded that even if DeWilde had standing, the action should be dismissed for failure to state a claim because machineguns are not protected by the Second Amendment. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm the district court’s dismissal for lack of standing. We express no opinion on the merits of the Second Amendment claim."

  • @thehammernator
    @thehammernator หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why am I getting Riff Raff energy with these glasses

  • @MagnusD
    @MagnusD หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They just recently made AR's and AK's legal for hunting in Sweden and you just had to 1up us.

    • @fortheloveofnoise
      @fortheloveofnoise หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep, when I saw that, I was happy, since I am an American who will be moving to Sweden

  • @kevingary7018
    @kevingary7018 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Time will tell the outcome of the 2A debate. Our constitution has endured through out several centuries, while today's modern gun control begun with the democratic party adopting liberal progressive socialism in the 20th century. I believe the words in our second amendment "shall not be infringed" will be taken at it's face value in the near future.

  • @markoneil6562
    @markoneil6562 หลายเดือนก่อน

    To be fair, i think my capabilities are far greater with a semi auto rifle, than any loser in Chicago who has a switch on a glock. But i would love to see newly manufactured machine guns legal again. Thanks Eric great video.