@@supraguy4694 Training these models require a lot of energy, making clips like these does not. but if everyone makes clips like these then it of course weights up, just like millions of people using Chatgpt also weighs up. The models however also get more efficient to run over time as the technology advances, and i think ChatGPT 4o has already come a long way in terms of that, which is also how the company can offer it for free. Bitcoin mining also gets more efficient over time but maybe not as much, however, bitcoin is usually mined where it's cost efficient, meaning where there's an abundance of renewable energy that can't be transferred to the rest of the world, for example on volcano islands. Cryptocurrency pollutes less than all of tradition banking.
Love how the market for AI is pretty much just stock footage and is all it was ever trained on, so the AI movie looks like someone bought too many licenses from shutter stock or whatever and edited it together
But even that would be more visually interesting. A skilled editor trying to put together something coherent out of completely unrelated stock videos could actually result in something watchable.
because ai is only good at creating the most generic things. not just the story, but the people and scenes are so generic looking too. Generic handsome white people.
@@wernerfels7584man people will see an algorithm generate one human face and immediately treat the terminator like a documentary, calm down it’s fiction for a reason
I bet Conservatives are gonna support this because it’s not made by “woke Hollywood elites”. I mean, we’ve all seen them hate on the writers and actors strikes last year, and they thought that AI would save the industry that was “corrupted by wokeness”.
If AI is replacing anything, it's daytime television like Jeopardy, The Price is Right etc. They are the easiest to replicate- plus, you don't need to pay a host
The "A.I" generative tech is honestly one of the most depressing things to happen as an artist. Especially how its being used by big companies to cut out actual artists and other creatives.
@@JBHUTT09yeah that can work in the field, but sadly it getting taken advantage of those damn greedy big companies cut out actual artistic value and make a cheap deal of Ai “Art”.
@@JBHUTT09 people keep telling me that, but i fail to see where these things a better than if i would do it myself. The only thing AI shines in, is making an inconsistent mess with no goal.
4:09 You would think if they were going to put an extreme close up on the hands, they'd make sure the woman didn't lose part of her index finger in a war and her middle finger look so weird at the tip.
Yes, these audiences can be created using subsidies from governments who pay them out to attract AI business to your country. It will be paid from your tax money. And if you can't pay tax because you are already unemployed because of AI, it will be paid from your reduced unemployment benefits. Either way, you will pay for this, and the AI "creators" (big business in cahoots with your government) will receive.
Honestly, this gave me a great idea. Use AI for a shape-shifting monster in a horror film. Like it's not perfect and constantly has these little oddities and mistakes. The uncanny feel would be the point. Train it on an actor who gets paid for it (limit it to that one film in the contract so they're not signing away their likeness for anything the studio wants). In this way, AI could be just another tool in the toolbox rather than a garbage plagiarism machine.
@@BrandonPilcher yeah I’ve been thinking this since ai started coming out. That would be an actual practical way to use the whole shape-shifty ai thing
I keep saying this, but I'm surprised nobody's yet attempted a horror film that utilizes the grotesque, uncanny body-horror abominations that earlier AI generators tend to spit out.
Even calling it a "movie" is an insult to Neil Breen, his movies belongs in 'so bad it's good' category. An AI "movie" has zero tolerance, it belongs in a dumpster fire.
This has to be written by AI. I refuse to believe that an editor looked at this script and changed nothing. Two strangers meet on a train to Paris, and fall in love is your first draft of a romance story. That isn't your romance story, or that SHOULDN'T be. No confliction, no romantic rivals, no backstories on either leads. Its kinda wild that they forgot the most important part about romance movies: they're character dramas. The audience needs to LIKE and sympathize with the leads so that we look forward to their journey. If your leads are: generically attractive man is mysterious and generically attractive woman is indecisive, you have failed. You're making a saltine cracker of a movie. That is not a compelling love story. I can believe that the plot is AI because it sounds so unbearably generic as a story. This wouldn’t even pass the tumblr test.
This looks like one of those tween-animation Wallpaper Engine skins of an anime character/scenery, except its an entire movie. I guess I commend the ambition, but man, at a certain point you just need to realise the technology isn't there and this all needs to be scrapped.
What's funny is there's a fan made ai generated video for FF6 on a Japanese account that is insanely good, besides weird mouth movement the party members stay consistent throughout the video and looks way better than this There's also a way to get to to keep generating the same character from a source so it isn't wildly different
@@KaladinVegapunk I think it would be funny if the AI Engine generated a movie that was “too realistic”, where people fart and sneeze randomly, and things like that.
Paris was called the city of Lights because the buildings had been blackened with soot. So if you looked at it at night, it would look like stars. Then they cleaned it all up.
@@forregom Ahh yes, I must have missed the part where they operate themselves for their own motivations and goals completely independent of human input.
This doesn’t worry me because people that don’t know how to make art are trying to make movies. They don’t know what they’re doing at all, it will always be trash, no matter how much the generated images improve.
Agreed. Plus, hard problems are hard. There simply isn't enough data to train an AI to do literally anything you want, so it can do some broad things, but struggles with complex and specific problems (which artwork, film, programming, etc are filled with.)
It's been like that before AI became a tool, all the studios and companies are ran by money people know, and funding is held hostage unless you adhere to their profit driven demands. If you asked someone to paint a picture, but the subject and color choices and ratios where purely dictated by a market survey, you'd probably end up with an equally uninspired mess, as if a machine did it.
The thing with ai is just looks so fucking amateur. Like, it has no personality and crudely tries to imitate what conventional “good” looking art is without really understanding it intuitively. And it’s especially worse because the people generating this stuff probably aren’t that deep into art to begin with. Actual creatives would have come up with a way to leverage the limitations, much like toy story did by using plastic toys as the main characters, in a creative way. Maybe something like adam said, by using different art styles like other works have in the past.
I actually almost worked with someone who made AI models for a comic and expected it to be the next most amazing thing that everyone would want to invest in... He cant get a consitent generation to save his life. I think he might be pissed that someone is using this and getting way more popular, even if it is crap lol.
We're getting to the age where it's more and more obvious capitalism is bringing down personal freedoms and creativity. That's the only reason I can explain to myself why this is made. Pay less people less money and put less effort into art.
Are you sure it's "capitalism"? Because I think the reduction of an individual to do as ordered from above and only consume as much as permitted is the hallmark of collectivism/socialism. In fact, AI would make a great communist dictator.
@@clray123 slowly capitalism in this country has eroded those freedoms to only consume what is offered, especially in film. I'm not saying you're wrong I'm just saying we've never been a socialist economy
@@bentramer682 That is correct, actual socialist economies have done even worse. But the erosion of freedoms is not due to capitalism, it is due to authoritarian or "collectivist" thinking, i.e. allowing your government (in collusion with big companies) to dictate what you should or should not buy, and also to violently take away your money and spend it as they like rather than as you would like. In that setup you don't really decide whether you support a big company or not, the big company gets a subsidy from your government. Which is not really all that "capitalist" any more (although it is a result of capitalism combined with corruption).
my guess why Poland is mentioned as one of the countries in the description claiming the movie was "animated" by people: there was a 2023 movie titled "The Peasants", which over the course of 5 years was hand-painted frame by frame, while the four studios working on the film's visuals were in Poland, Lithuania, Ukraine and Serbia, the bias for Poland probably came from being released in Poland, being based on a Polish novel and more
I'm sure this movie will be in the history books, right next to other major events in film history like the first made for TV movie, the first straight to DVD movie, and the first TH-cam movie.
the core legality issue is that the database these AIs are trained on, are stolen. The most realistic way is forcing companies that provide AIs, to make their own databases with licensed work, but this will inevitebly reduce the quality and highten the costs of upholding the AI.
I believe the pendulum will swing back around and audiences will want stories written by real people again. When exactly will that happen? Well, that's for time to decide.
I suggest looking up some of the articles about how they made the recent Air Head short film to promote open AI's new Sora video generation thing. Basically it involved generating a huge amount of footage (using a huge amount of time and computing power) and then editing it together into something coherent, more like a documentary than a narrative film. You couldn't come up with a less efficient way to make a film if you tried. Visually this looks much more primitive than Air Head. Currently there are people using stable diffusion to generate very short animations (like 3 second loops, with quality rapidly falling off the longer they get), and this looks like they've just decided to piece together that sort of generation to make a feature length film. This stuff is so obviously not ready to make an actual film that the most likely scenario is that this is a borderline scam to cash in on the AI buzzword craze.
AI bros who think machines can accurately draw hands by now clearly have never seen a hand before. Same thing goes for faces, honestly 4:40 The index finger is half the length it should be, how did Adum not notice that?
They can’t even hold on a shot for a few seconds before they completely melt. Everyone says “we’re not there yet” but I don’t want a “yet” we shouldn’t be going in that direction with Ai at all
I remember a comment where some kid was going on about how he doesn't care that AI can negatively impact artists because he _"just wants to be able to make awesome movies whenever he wants."_ Congratulations, kid. This eerie, soulless trainwreck is the exact sort of thing that attitude creates. Hell, even some of the "better" AI storytelling I've seen still tends to quickly fall apart because it inevitably becomes generic and repetitive since all it can do is try to mush together stuff based on what it knows.
I feel like Star Trek had something when they had all their humans only consuming old media (like re-enacting Shakespeare or relistening to 80's music) and the only ones making or doing anything new were the robots...
AI won't actually be artificially intelligent until the computer starts making stuff with absolutely no human input at all. All we've got right now are algorithms that stitch together stolen art.
In the past people wanted robots to do the laundry and do peoples jobs so they can persue their hobbies and art and just generally have a good time But the opposite happens and ai takes people out of art so all that’s left to do is still be forced to work obsolete jobs that can be automated already
It's sad to see nobody is going to use AI for the intended purpose of menial work or a rough draft that needs actual people to touch up and change details to perfect it. It's going to be lazily used just to make "everything," even the "creative" choices. I mean ffs, you don't just type into a calculator, "do math."
Can ai even create something original? Aren’t all the assets in the trailer plucked from something else and morphed into what the writer wants it to be? I know a lot of AI takes from books like A song of ice and fire, which has opened up a copyright case against generative AI.
Basically not. It learns the metadata of whatever it is fed and humans need to sort out what this metadata means. So inevitebly its just a mix of things humans already know, mashed together to a kind of average version of it. Thats why it cant get hands right. It just "sees" hands, a human tells it its a hand. Do this a million times and the ai has a lot of images to pull from for hands, but it doesnt know how a hand functions, so it doesnt piece them together in a sensical way.
All AI used for creative purposes only will show uncreative/talented people are not only STILL uncreative/talented but also boring and incompetent 🤣😂🤣 Keep it up guys.
7:00 Yeah, but those human beings can take something away from the experience of creating it. This whole argument Adum put forward about AI previously, that Machine slob shouldn't be a concern for those who focus on real artists, falls apart completely as soon as you consider movies to not be made in a vacuum but be the result of a collective effort, by people who, if they weren't allowed to create slob, weren't allowed to fail as artists, would later not be in a position where they could make something actually worth while.
I think the sad part is that the people who are making these AI movies basically just want to produce something with the least amount of effort. I feel like with how uncanny and strange looking these movies can be, a more creative person could use this medium to make an incredibly unique experience you couldn't make with human artists. Its like when more studios started making stylized 3D movies rather than hyper realistic ones. I feel like there's something here that could be tapped into that unfortunately wont get explored.
it looks like to compensate for AI not being particularly inclined to generate the same person over and over they just did all the close up dialog in one take and split it up as needed
Nobody's going to watch a film where the characters can't even look in the same direction. What a waste of electricity.
Yeah, bitcoin mining is already bad enough for the environment but AI is going to make things so much worse
@@supraguy4694 Training these models require a lot of energy, making clips like these does not. but if everyone makes clips like these then it of course weights up, just like millions of people using Chatgpt also weighs up. The models however also get more efficient to run over time as the technology advances, and i think ChatGPT 4o has already come a long way in terms of that, which is also how the company can offer it for free. Bitcoin mining also gets more efficient over time but maybe not as much, however, bitcoin is usually mined where it's cost efficient, meaning where there's an abundance of renewable energy that can't be transferred to the rest of the world, for example on volcano islands. Cryptocurrency pollutes less than all of tradition banking.
You’re giving audiences too much credit. At the very least, Ai loving tech bros will claim they like it, and will continue pushing it forward.
@@mileshill7196Nah even audiences who love Michael Bay wouldn’t like this
I want AI to do my chores and clean my house, not to take away my creative expression.
and make it worse in the process
*Movie Execs:* "NOOOOOO I whas all de moneys n nah pay any wan."
its not you paranoid schizo
NOOOO AI STOP MELTING DOWN MY PAINT BRUSHES YOU ARE TAKING AWAY MY CREATIVE EXPRESSION!
I want AI help me with my math homework, Not to steal my artwork and make a cheap profit off of it.
Love how the market for AI is pretty much just stock footage and is all it was ever trained on, so the AI movie looks like someone bought too many licenses from shutter stock or whatever and edited it together
But even that would be more visually interesting.
A skilled editor trying to put together something coherent out of completely unrelated stock videos could actually result in something watchable.
@@peterstangl8295 reminds me of those stock photo dance memes. Those are great
A basic romance story made by a soulless machine
At least some basic stories made by real people have some quality to them.
A.I. doesn't know what quality even means.
Like any romcom ever, amirite, folks?
Amirite?
Amirite?
Amirite?
Amirite?
Amirite?
Folks?
Amirite?
Amirite?
Folks?
Amirite?
because ai is only good at creating the most generic things.
not just the story, but the people and scenes are so generic looking too. Generic handsome white people.
it's like I'm watching animated stock photos
@@Suko120 A.I. photo-shop. 🤢
AI gets to create art while humans slave away doing hard, deadly and dehumanizing labor and I'm sure there's nothing backwards about that
Must be the AIs fault, not the humans creating the system thats harming us. BE AFRAID AI SCARY
Livestock
That is one possible Option when AI Take over
I myself will hide in the peruan Rainforst If i can
Indeed, the former requires the latter.
@@wernerfels7584man people will see an algorithm generate one human face and immediately treat the terminator like a documentary, calm down it’s fiction for a reason
@@scottcaramelIf you can't see the issue with this, I don't know how to explain it to you, it's just common sense
The permanent, vacant, lifeless stares in random directions really bring this project to life lmao
"disgusting" is definitely the right word here
It is so poignant.
I bet Conservatives are gonna support this because it’s not made by “woke Hollywood elites”. I mean, we’ve all seen them hate on the writers and actors strikes last year, and they thought that AI would save the industry that was “corrupted by wokeness”.
And even that feels like an understatement
they make an AI movie and use it for a genre that classically has like ZERO effects shots. what a great way to use endlesss possibilities!
Go ahead, make a half convincing explosion with AI
If AI is replacing anything, it's daytime television like Jeopardy, The Price is Right etc. They are the easiest to replicate- plus, you don't need to pay a host
This studio is running so efficiently that all the physical labor is now done by a single Australian man.
With blackjack! And hookers!
The "A.I" generative tech is honestly one of the most depressing things to happen as an artist. Especially how its being used by big companies to cut out actual artists and other creatives.
Yeah. It could be a cool tool for artists to use to make certain tasks easier, but it can't replace artists.
@@JBHUTT09yeah that can work in the field, but sadly it getting taken advantage of those damn greedy big companies cut out actual artistic value and make a cheap deal of Ai “Art”.
@@JBHUTT09 people keep telling me that, but i fail to see where these things a better than if i would do it myself. The only thing AI shines in, is making an inconsistent mess with no goal.
And it all looks like crap. And that’s what the capitalist billionaire class thinks you deserve. The bare minimum at the most exorbitant cost
cope, nobody is using ai yet for this shit
If you dont care enough about your film to even bother making it yourself. Why would I ever care enough about it to bother watching it.
This stuff fills me with deep cosmic horror dread and terror.
4:09 You would think if they were going to put an extreme close up on the hands, they'd make sure the woman didn't lose part of her index finger in a war and her middle finger look so weird at the tip.
The new Super Seducer game looks phenomenal.
Tbh, I would take 12 hours of Super Seducer cringe compilations over this.
There's a new Supa Seducer out? Cynical Reviews stream here we come boys!
Sorry, I was the 70th like to your comment
Super Seducer is real art
can we just get an AI generated audience to watch this instead of us having to suffer it?
Mean the TH-cam bots commenters, lmao? xD
Yes, these audiences can be created using subsidies from governments who pay them out to attract AI business to your country. It will be paid from your tax money. And if you can't pay tax because you are already unemployed because of AI, it will be paid from your reduced unemployment benefits. Either way, you will pay for this, and the AI "creators" (big business in cahoots with your government) will receive.
I'm getting traumatic flashbacks to the AI generated background and audience characters I saw another video on. 😭
the AI money will inflate the AI economy
Honestly, this gave me a great idea. Use AI for a shape-shifting monster in a horror film. Like it's not perfect and constantly has these little oddities and mistakes. The uncanny feel would be the point. Train it on an actor who gets paid for it (limit it to that one film in the contract so they're not signing away their likeness for anything the studio wants). In this way, AI could be just another tool in the toolbox rather than a garbage plagiarism machine.
Well what's the point of AI if we actually use our imaginations?
No
Sounds like something from a Lovecraft story.
@@BrandonPilcher yeah I’ve been thinking this since ai started coming out. That would be an actual practical way to use the whole shape-shifty ai thing
I keep saying this, but I'm surprised nobody's yet attempted a horror film that utilizes the grotesque, uncanny body-horror abominations that earlier AI generators tend to spit out.
This looks less like a movie, more like a slide slow with animation. Honestly, a poor first attempt for "ground-breaking" tech.
Calling this an “Movie” is a war crime against actual people create the movies we love to watch.
Yeah! Like marvel!
If it's a motion picture, than it's a "movie", no matter how terrible it is.
I think you meant to say, "Yeah! Like the DCEU".@@p0n-pompf
Even calling it a "movie" is an insult to Neil Breen, his movies belongs in 'so bad it's good' category. An AI "movie" has zero tolerance, it belongs in a dumpster fire.
AI would have done better with rings of power.
This has to be written by AI. I refuse to believe that an editor looked at this script and changed nothing.
Two strangers meet on a train to Paris, and fall in love is your first draft of a romance story. That isn't your romance story, or that SHOULDN'T be. No confliction, no romantic rivals, no backstories on either leads. Its kinda wild that they forgot the most important part about romance movies: they're character dramas. The audience needs to LIKE and sympathize with the leads so that we look forward to their journey. If your leads are: generically attractive man is mysterious and generically attractive woman is indecisive, you have failed. You're making a saltine cracker of a movie. That is not a compelling love story. I can believe that the plot is AI because it sounds so unbearably generic as a story.
This wouldn’t even pass the tumblr test.
It's not even a saltine - it's hardtack.
It genuinely feels like they put the prompt “Write a love story” into ChatGPT and then went with the result without editing it.
This looks like one of those tween-animation Wallpaper Engine skins of an anime character/scenery, except its an entire movie. I guess I commend the ambition, but man, at a certain point you just need to realise the technology isn't there and this all needs to be scrapped.
This AI thing completely lost it's muster in the 80s Dark Fantasy TM phase, this is embarrassing.
6:40 There's two 3s on that clock...
and all symbols in the outer circle are nonsense^^
and 4 is IIII instead of IV
At the minute hand suddenly "ticks" through 5 minutes
dream logic
Those AI Breaking Bad shorts are the bane of my existence. The artificiality makes my monkey brain angry
It looks a little like the pictures distributed by Jehova's Witnesses.
This isn't an uncanny valley, it's an uncanny Grand Canyon
In this case, AI stands for “absent integrity”
™️
What's funny is there's a fan made ai generated video for FF6 on a Japanese account that is insanely good, besides weird mouth movement the party members stay consistent throughout the video and looks way better than this
There's also a way to get to to keep generating the same character from a source so it isn't wildly different
@@KaladinVegapunk I think it would be funny if the AI Engine generated a movie that was “too realistic”, where people fart and sneeze randomly, and things like that.
@@KaladinVegapunk i need to see this, do you have a link perhaps?
Paris was called the city of Lights because the buildings had been blackened with soot. So if you looked at it at night, it would look like stars. Then they cleaned it all up.
I think the reason why Ai art exists is because people like the idea of creating art more than they want to learn how.
This is exactly it
I think the reason why paint brushes exist is because people like the idea of creating art more than they want to learn how to fingerpaint.
A paintbrush is a tool.
A.I. is a replacement.
@@forregom Ahh yes, I must have missed the part where they operate themselves for their own motivations and goals completely independent of human input.
@@Gorgonzeyehow does brushpaint generate art based on prompt?
Ill refer to a comment ive seen for this which goes "why would i bother to read/watch a story that no one could be bothered to even write?"
IT'S ALL STILL IMAGES
Yeah I was thinking if he was ever going to comment on how literally the whole thing is a still image or in extreme slow motion
It reminds me of how console games two generations ago would do less important cutscenes as slightly animated still art to save money.
thats what movies are
This doesn’t worry me because people that don’t know how to make art are trying to make movies. They don’t know what they’re doing at all, it will always be trash, no matter how much the generated images improve.
Agreed. Plus, hard problems are hard. There simply isn't enough data to train an AI to do literally anything you want, so it can do some broad things, but struggles with complex and specific problems (which artwork, film, programming, etc are filled with.)
Yep. Non-artists don't know how to think creativity, so their AI projects are already dead on arrival.
It's been like that before AI became a tool, all the studios and companies are ran by money people know, and funding is held hostage unless you adhere to their profit driven demands.
If you asked someone to paint a picture, but the subject and color choices and ratios where purely dictated by a market survey, you'd probably end up with an equally uninspired mess, as if a machine did it.
@@jampine8268 that really blocky art style that is used in a lot of ads are evidence enough lol. It’s so ugly but they keep using it.
3:32 She's literally walking into the water.
TCL? The same company that makes the cheapest TV’s you can buy at Walmart?
The intro made me think it was the French Train company, then I remembered that's TGV
The thing with ai is just looks so fucking amateur. Like, it has no personality and crudely tries to imitate what conventional “good” looking art is without really understanding it intuitively. And it’s especially worse because the people generating this stuff probably aren’t that deep into art to begin with. Actual creatives would have come up with a way to leverage the limitations, much like toy story did by using plastic toys as the main characters, in a creative way. Maybe something like adam said, by using different art styles like other works have in the past.
I actually almost worked with someone who made AI models for a comic and expected it to be the next most amazing thing that everyone would want to invest in... He cant get a consitent generation to save his life. I think he might be pissed that someone is using this and getting way more popular, even if it is crap lol.
We're getting to the age where it's more and more obvious capitalism is bringing down personal freedoms and creativity. That's the only reason I can explain to myself why this is made. Pay less people less money and put less effort into art.
Are you sure it's "capitalism"? Because I think the reduction of an individual to do as ordered from above and only consume as much as permitted is the hallmark of collectivism/socialism. In fact, AI would make a great communist dictator.
@@clray123 slowly capitalism in this country has eroded those freedoms to only consume what is offered, especially in film. I'm not saying you're wrong I'm just saying we've never been a socialist economy
@@bentramer682 That is correct, actual socialist economies have done even worse. But the erosion of freedoms is not due to capitalism, it is due to authoritarian or "collectivist" thinking, i.e. allowing your government (in collusion with big companies) to dictate what you should or should not buy, and also to violently take away your money and spend it as they like rather than as you would like. In that setup you don't really decide whether you support a big company or not, the big company gets a subsidy from your government. Which is not really all that "capitalist" any more (although it is a result of capitalism combined with corruption).
5:37 This looks like those Baka mitai deep fake memes.
This is just watching an uncanny slideshow for an hour and a half
The uncanny valley is still uncanny and this feels like really weird video game cut scene CGI.
my guess why Poland is mentioned as one of the countries in the description claiming the movie was "animated" by people:
there was a 2023 movie titled "The Peasants", which over the course of 5 years was hand-painted frame by frame, while the four studios working on the film's visuals were in Poland, Lithuania, Ukraine and Serbia, the bias for Poland probably came from being released in Poland, being based on a Polish novel and more
Remember Episode? That app with trashy interactive stories with equally trashy art? This movie trailer feels like that.
This is pretty much exactly what I expected an AI movie to be like, inconsistent, uncanny looking people, none of it makes any sense.
If anyone is curious, TCL is one of the largest train companies in France. This is weird.
Damn, wonder why the comments were turned off
They mentioned bringing it to the "market square", and their favorite market square is in Beijing, China.
this is like if someone made an Internet Historian 'Nordman" video into a full movie. With no budget or permission.
it’ll be interesting to see if AI can respect the 180 degree rule 😂
ugh the more you look at it the worse it gets!
This looks like excellent horror movie
I'm sure this movie will be in the history books, right next to other major events in film history like the first made for TV movie, the first straight to DVD movie, and the first TH-cam movie.
Why hasn’t this been illegal yet?
Think about why. How do you ban this? Its such a broad and complicated topic you can't blanket ban it.
the core legality issue is that the database these AIs are trained on, are stolen. The most realistic way is forcing companies that provide AIs, to make their own databases with licensed work, but this will inevitebly reduce the quality and highten the costs of upholding the AI.
@@deusex9731 Are you a firm believer in IP?
Because banning something purely because we don't like it is immoral?
@@Oliver-qz4kf gonna refer to my comment, because it isnt just "not liked". It is abusing loopholes in the law that havent been closed
People who like AI art never had the intention of actually making art themselves. They just want to sell a product with as little effort as possible.
correct, but thats always been the case.
I believe the pendulum will swing back around and audiences will want stories written by real people again. When exactly will that happen? Well, that's for time to decide.
I suggest looking up some of the articles about how they made the recent Air Head short film to promote open AI's new Sora video generation thing. Basically it involved generating a huge amount of footage (using a huge amount of time and computing power) and then editing it together into something coherent, more like a documentary than a narrative film. You couldn't come up with a less efficient way to make a film if you tried.
Visually this looks much more primitive than Air Head. Currently there are people using stable diffusion to generate very short animations (like 3 second loops, with quality rapidly falling off the longer they get), and this looks like they've just decided to piece together that sort of generation to make a feature length film. This stuff is so obviously not ready to make an actual film that the most likely scenario is that this is a borderline scam to cash in on the AI buzzword craze.
Wish these cowards left the comments on, you know that comment section would be way more entertaining than the 'movie' itself.
Can't wait to pirate this movie, it's what AI "artists" would want since I'm simply taking their material for my own gain!
It wouldn't even be pirating, since AI "art" can't be copyrighted. You can just take it, it's legal.
Except this crap would not be worth any pirating.
@kimvarki The fact AI art isn't copyrightable is why I'm not super concerned about it. How do you copyright something that literally anyone can make?
AI bros who think machines can accurately draw hands by now clearly have never seen a hand before. Same thing goes for faces, honestly
4:40 The index finger is half the length it should be, how did Adum not notice that?
AI can barely generate irises, which are just circles lmao
@@kiwipie9415 Can't even generate circles, which are just circles too
I love that the end take away for this is- This may or may not exist!
We're doomed, alright......
Disney live action remakes have more soul than this holy shit💀
7:08 AI is taking over the entertainment industry in 2020’s. Its happening, ITS HAPPENING?!?
People who think this is going to replace everything are just falling for the hype in a different way
This hurts to watch man
4:20 I'm positive the face in the bike helmet is mainly taken from Timothee Chalamet wearing a stillsuit in Dune
They can’t even hold on a shot for a few seconds before they completely melt. Everyone says “we’re not there yet” but I don’t want a “yet” we shouldn’t be going in that direction with Ai at all
I remember a comment where some kid was going on about how he doesn't care that AI can negatively impact artists because he _"just wants to be able to make awesome movies whenever he wants."_
Congratulations, kid. This eerie, soulless trainwreck is the exact sort of thing that attitude creates.
Hell, even some of the "better" AI storytelling I've seen still tends to quickly fall apart because it inevitably becomes generic and repetitive since all it can do is try to mush together stuff based on what it knows.
i will prepare my fanciest weed for this watchalong
You can't fool me. This is just another one of Big Money Salvia's fake Ai trailers.
This is a movie made not by artists, but by salesmen for a technology that makes them hard
I feel like Star Trek had something when they had all their humans only consuming old media (like re-enacting Shakespeare or relistening to 80's music) and the only ones making or doing anything new were the robots...
This is the scariest horror trailer I've seen in a while. Also everyone who made this should be in jail for crimes against humanity.
This is to art what soilent green is to food 😂
At least Soylent Green is real and delicious.
Puffy blonde haired guy character is 100% ripped from Guy Pearce’s Memento character
I love how their only idea basically consists of "make two ai girl/boyfriends interact"
I'm not surprised it's not on IMDB, there's noone to credit with the production xD
AI:
Expectation: * Rosie (the Jetsons) *
Reality: * unholy spawn of Skynet (The Terminator) and Master Control Program (Tron) *
april 12th is pretty close to april 1st
6:39 The numbers on the clock go 1, 3, 3, 4 in Roman numerals.
AI won't actually be artificially intelligent until the computer starts making stuff with absolutely no human input at all. All we've got right now are algorithms that stitch together stolen art.
This is a crime against humanity and nature.
There’s a really good movie for the audience to boycott and send a message!
In the past people wanted robots to do the laundry and do peoples jobs so they can persue their hobbies and art and just generally have a good time
But the opposite happens and ai takes people out of art so all that’s left to do is still be forced to work obsolete jobs that can be automated already
1:39 looks like Guy Pierce from Memento. Instead of being too clean in his face.
It's sad to see nobody is going to use AI for the intended purpose of menial work or a rough draft that needs actual people to touch up and change details to perfect it. It's going to be lazily used just to make "everything," even the "creative" choices. I mean ffs, you don't just type into a calculator, "do math."
Can ai even create something original? Aren’t all the assets in the trailer plucked from something else and morphed into what the writer wants it to be? I know a lot of AI takes from books like A song of ice and fire, which has opened up a copyright case against generative AI.
Basically not. It learns the metadata of whatever it is fed and humans need to sort out what this metadata means. So inevitebly its just a mix of things humans already know, mashed together to a kind of average version of it. Thats why it cant get hands right. It just "sees" hands, a human tells it its a hand. Do this a million times and the ai has a lot of images to pull from for hands, but it doesnt know how a hand functions, so it doesnt piece them together in a sensical way.
It can average over and distort existing content to generate "new" content.
6:40 damn that clock sucks ass, it can only tell time in increments of 5 whole minutes.
So... is it live action or animation?
A snuff film would be more in touch with the romance genre than this.
It's good to see Gal Gadot getting more work
All AI used for creative purposes only will show uncreative/talented people are not only STILL uncreative/talented but also boring and incompetent 🤣😂🤣 Keep it up guys.
7:00 Yeah, but those human beings can take something away from the experience of creating it.
This whole argument Adum put forward about AI previously, that Machine slob shouldn't be a concern for those who focus on real artists,
falls apart completely as soon as you consider movies to not be made in a vacuum but be the result of a collective effort,
by people who, if they weren't allowed to create slob, weren't allowed to fail as artists, would later not be in a position where they could make something actually worth while.
I think the sad part is that the people who are making these AI movies basically just want to produce something with the least amount of effort. I feel like with how uncanny and strange looking these movies can be, a more creative person could use this medium to make an incredibly unique experience you couldn't make with human artists.
Its like when more studios started making stylized 3D movies rather than hyper realistic ones. I feel like there's something here that could be tapped into that unfortunately wont get explored.
i wish AI had feelings so i can hurt it
That chatter that said they can't wait for Disney to make AI remakes of their live action remakes killed me
"An AI powered love story"
whoop-de-fucking-do.
AI and people who can't make art without AI have the same level of creativity (none) so it makes sense why an AI movie looks like this.
it looks like to compensate for AI not being particularly inclined to generate the same person over and over they just did all the close up dialog in one take and split it up as needed
Well ai is disgusting so
This move is brought to you by the AI Girlfriend+ app.
Why should I bother to watch a movie nobody could be bothered to make
I love how the characters stare directly into the camera. The first thing they teach any film actor is to not look straight into the camera.
With the right prompts I could literally get ChatGPT to spit out a far better script
Dare I say good