Appreciate the presentation, especially concerning what the Church needs, and most especially your kind words on Petersen's "The Message." If pastors and priests would use it more and base their homilies/sermons on it, especially with the Prophets and the N.T. Letters, church would be far more interesting. I use The Message faithfully each and every day.
Forgive me if I am incorrect, but it seems that you do not have a mystical inclination. If not, to further this conversation would likely be a waste of time because we would not be able to meet on common ground.
Wonderful!
Appreciate the presentation, especially concerning what the Church needs, and most especially your kind words on Petersen's "The Message." If pastors and priests would use it more and base their homilies/sermons on it, especially with the Prophets and the N.T. Letters, church would be far more interesting. I use The Message faithfully each and every day.
Like nebulousness, vaguery, and evasion, mysticism is difficult to define.
I think he quoted Underhill as defining mysticism as union with reality
@@DiscipuliCordis So delusion, then.
Forgive me if I am incorrect, but it seems that you do not have a mystical inclination. If not, to further this conversation would likely be a waste of time because we would not be able to meet on common ground.
@@DiscipuliCordis Only consider that the source of all meaning is multiplication, subject to verification by addition.
I would certainly consider it if I knew what you meant. Your comment is nebulous, vague, and evasive