Tribute for Monkey D luffy fans, the best character of the One Piece Anime. Used video: One Piece episode :278,396,474,733,1015 Owner of used videos is FUNImation.
One under rated moment is when he pulls Katakuri into mirror world and doesnt hesitate to smash the mirror cutting himself off from the only way back onto his ship at the moment and making sure no matter what happens his crew is safe .
Confess the Lord Jesus Christ with your mouth and believe in your heart that He died for your sins on the cross and God raised Him from the dead on the third day; repent of your sins and be baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit! Evidence for Jesus Christ’s existence, crucifixion, and disappearance from the tomb (He rose from it): The Lord Jesus Christ did exist, gathered disciples, and was crucified and went missing from the tomb. To argue about wether He was taken from the grave or rose from it, is an argument a skeptic can make. Because well if you disregard the eye witness testimony of the disciples and there willingness to die for Christ, and humans won’t die for something they know is a lie, when Peter is pinned upside down to that cross, he could have said that it was a fake, but He didn’t because it wasn’t, what care would he have about death in this world if he knew for a fact he had assurance of a life in another, Jesus Christ did rise from the tomb and is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Now the evidence for the Lord Jesus Christ’s existence really isn’t hard to find a multitude of non-Christian scholars and historians mention Him within 150 years after the time of His life. One such is Tacitus a Roman historian who reported on emperor nero’s decision to blame the Christians for the fire that had destroyed rome in 64 AD. Tacitus wrote: “Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome…” In this Tacitus makes reference to not only Christians, but Christ calling Him Christus and confirming the Gospels going on to say that He suffered the extreme penalty (crucifixion) under the reign of Tiberius and by the sentence of Pontius Pilate, which like I said confirms the Gospels narrative. Another important source of evidence about Jesus and early Christianity can be found in the letters of Pliny the Younger to Emperor Trajan. Pliny was the Roman governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. In one of his letters, dated around A.D. 112, he asks Trajan's advice about the appropriate way to conduct legal proceedings against those accused of being Christians. Pliny says that he needed to consult the emperor about this issue because a great multitude of every age, class, and sex stood accused of Christianity. At one point in his letter, Pliny relates some of the information he has learned about these Christians: “They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food - but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.” This passage provides a number of interesting insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christians. First, we see that Christians regularly met on a certain fixed day for worship. Second, their worship was directed to Christ, demonstrating that they firmly believed in His divinity. Furthermore, one scholar interprets Pliny's statement that hymns were sung to Christ, "as to a god", as a reference to the rather distinctive fact that, "unlike other gods who were worshipped, Christ was a person who had lived on earth." If this interpretation is correct, Pliny understood that Christians were worshipping an actual historical person as God! Of course, this agrees perfectly with the New Testament doctrine that Jesus was both God and man. You may have heard of the scholar Flavius Josephus who mentioned James as being the brother of the Lord Jesus Christ, which matches what Paul said calling James “The Lord’s brother” and there is another document that Josephus may have written which goes: “About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.” Now it’s up to debate wether this is the entirely original document of what Josephus wrote, or if a Christian had edited it. But regardless he wrote about the Lord Jesus Christ. Wether it was negative or positive like the possible document is. Anyways there are many other statements, documents, letters, and writings of all sorts from the ancient world talking about the Lord Jesus Christ and there is not one question if He was a real person or if He was crucified and went missing from the grave. That is clear as day, He is a real person, was crucified, and went missing from the grave. And He did rise from the grave. And for more evidence of the Lord Jesus Christ, there’s the Bible and you see there is no evidence the Bible is corrupted, a lie, created by the Roman government, folktale. It is the recount of the Disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, now wether you want to believe it is up to you. And what profit was there in spreading Christianity, All the early Christian suffered persecution, beatings, and were killed. Another Scholar reported that James the Lord’s Brother was thrown off a building and then stoned to death for spreading the Gospel in Jerusalem. These people went to great lengths even giving their own lives for the Lord Jesus Christ. Amen!
@@SilentStone13 Confess the Lord Jesus Christ with your mouth and believe in your heart that He died for your sins on the cross and God raised Him from the dead on the third day; repent of your sins and be baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit! Evidence for Jesus Christ’s existence, crucifixion, and disappearance from the tomb (He rose from it): The Lord Jesus Christ did exist, gathered disciples, and was crucified and went missing from the tomb. To argue about wether He was taken from the grave or rose from it, is an argument a skeptic can make. Because well if you disregard the eye witness testimony of the disciples and there willingness to die for Christ, and humans won’t die for something they know is a lie, when Peter is pinned upside down to that cross, he could have said that it was a fake, but He didn’t because it wasn’t, what care would he have about death in this world if he knew for a fact he had assurance of a life in another, Jesus Christ did rise from the tomb and is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Now the evidence for the Lord Jesus Christ’s existence really isn’t hard to find a multitude of non-Christian scholars and historians mention Him within 150 years after the time of His life. One such is Tacitus a Roman historian who reported on emperor nero’s decision to blame the Christians for the fire that had destroyed rome in 64 AD. Tacitus wrote: “Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome…” In this Tacitus makes reference to not only Christians, but Christ calling Him Christus and confirming the Gospels going on to say that He suffered the extreme penalty (crucifixion) under the reign of Tiberius and by the sentence of Pontius Pilate, which like I said confirms the Gospels narrative. Another important source of evidence about Jesus and early Christianity can be found in the letters of Pliny the Younger to Emperor Trajan. Pliny was the Roman governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. In one of his letters, dated around A.D. 112, he asks Trajan's advice about the appropriate way to conduct legal proceedings against those accused of being Christians. Pliny says that he needed to consult the emperor about this issue because a great multitude of every age, class, and sex stood accused of Christianity. At one point in his letter, Pliny relates some of the information he has learned about these Christians: “They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food - but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.” This passage provides a number of interesting insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christians. First, we see that Christians regularly met on a certain fixed day for worship. Second, their worship was directed to Christ, demonstrating that they firmly believed in His divinity. Furthermore, one scholar interprets Pliny's statement that hymns were sung to Christ, "as to a god", as a reference to the rather distinctive fact that, "unlike other gods who were worshipped, Christ was a person who had lived on earth." If this interpretation is correct, Pliny understood that Christians were worshipping an actual historical person as God! Of course, this agrees perfectly with the New Testament doctrine that Jesus was both God and man. You may have heard of the scholar Flavius Josephus who mentioned James as being the brother of the Lord Jesus Christ, which matches what Paul said calling James “The Lord’s brother” and there is another document that Josephus may have written which goes: “About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.” Now it’s up to debate wether this is the entirely original document of what Josephus wrote, or if a Christian had edited it. But regardless he wrote about the Lord Jesus Christ. Wether it was negative or positive like the possible document is. Anyways there are many other statements, documents, letters, and writings of all sorts from the ancient world talking about the Lord Jesus Christ and there is not one question if He was a real person or if He was crucified and went missing from the grave. That is clear as day, He is a real person, was crucified, and went missing from the grave. And He did rise from the grave. And for more evidence of the Lord Jesus Christ, there’s the Bible and you see there is no evidence the Bible is corrupted, a lie, created by the Roman government, folktale. It is the recount of the Disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, now wether you want to believe it is up to you. And what profit was there in spreading Christianity, All the early Christian suffered persecution, beatings, and were killed. Another Scholar reported that James the Lord’s Brother was thrown off a building and then stoned to death for spreading the Gospel in Jerusalem. These people went to great lengths even giving their own lives for the Lord Jesus Christ. Amen!
@@1alopezpr Confess the Lord Jesus Christ with your mouth and believe in your heart that He died for your sins on the cross and God raised Him from the dead on the third day; repent of your sins and be baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit! Evidence for Jesus Christ’s existence, crucifixion, and disappearance from the tomb (He rose from it): The Lord Jesus Christ did exist, gathered disciples, and was crucified and went missing from the tomb. To argue about wether He was taken from the grave or rose from it, is an argument a skeptic can make. Because well if you disregard the eye witness testimony of the disciples and there willingness to die for Christ, and humans won’t die for something they know is a lie, when Peter is pinned upside down to that cross, he could have said that it was a fake, but He didn’t because it wasn’t, what care would he have about death in this world if he knew for a fact he had assurance of a life in another, Jesus Christ did rise from the tomb and is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Now the evidence for the Lord Jesus Christ’s existence really isn’t hard to find a multitude of non-Christian scholars and historians mention Him within 150 years after the time of His life. One such is Tacitus a Roman historian who reported on emperor nero’s decision to blame the Christians for the fire that had destroyed rome in 64 AD. Tacitus wrote: “Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome…” In this Tacitus makes reference to not only Christians, but Christ calling Him Christus and confirming the Gospels going on to say that He suffered the extreme penalty (crucifixion) under the reign of Tiberius and by the sentence of Pontius Pilate, which like I said confirms the Gospels narrative. Another important source of evidence about Jesus and early Christianity can be found in the letters of Pliny the Younger to Emperor Trajan. Pliny was the Roman governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. In one of his letters, dated around A.D. 112, he asks Trajan's advice about the appropriate way to conduct legal proceedings against those accused of being Christians. Pliny says that he needed to consult the emperor about this issue because a great multitude of every age, class, and sex stood accused of Christianity. At one point in his letter, Pliny relates some of the information he has learned about these Christians: “They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food - but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.” This passage provides a number of interesting insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christians. First, we see that Christians regularly met on a certain fixed day for worship. Second, their worship was directed to Christ, demonstrating that they firmly believed in His divinity. Furthermore, one scholar interprets Pliny's statement that hymns were sung to Christ, "as to a god", as a reference to the rather distinctive fact that, "unlike other gods who were worshipped, Christ was a person who had lived on earth." If this interpretation is correct, Pliny understood that Christians were worshipping an actual historical person as God! Of course, this agrees perfectly with the New Testament doctrine that Jesus was both God and man. You may have heard of the scholar Flavius Josephus who mentioned James as being the brother of the Lord Jesus Christ, which matches what Paul said calling James “The Lord’s brother” and there is another document that Josephus may have written which goes: “About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.” Now it’s up to debate wether this is the entirely original document of what Josephus wrote, or if a Christian had edited it. But regardless he wrote about the Lord Jesus Christ. Wether it was negative or positive like the possible document is. Anyways there are many other statements, documents, letters, and writings of all sorts from the ancient world talking about the Lord Jesus Christ and there is not one question if He was a real person or if He was crucified and went missing from the grave. That is clear as day, He is a real person, was crucified, and went missing from the grave. And He did rise from the grave. And for more evidence of the Lord Jesus Christ, there’s the Bible and you see there is no evidence the Bible is corrupted, a lie, created by the Roman government, folktale. It is the recount of the Disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, now wether you want to believe it is up to you. And what profit was there in spreading Christianity, All the early Christian suffered persecution, beatings, and were killed. Another Scholar reported that James the Lord’s Brother was thrown off a building and then stoned to death for spreading the Gospel in Jerusalem. These people went to great lengths even giving their own lives for the Lord Jesus Christ. Amen!
Somebody mentioned this under a Crunchyroll video: the first one isn't just Luffy being petty and destroying the WG flag just to piss them off. In drum island he showed that he _fully_ understands what it means to attack someone's flag. It means you are attacking everything they stand for. He did that knowing _exactly_ what would happen next.
It wasn't petty. He destroyed the WG flag because Robin was willing to sacrifice her safety for the crew because her enemy was the world government. Luffy ordering to destroy the WG flag was a message to Robin. That he'll take on the WG for his crew mates so much so that he made them his enemy with the destruction of the flag. Because the consequence of destroying it means an act of war against the WG
It's even deeper then that. At that moment Luffy fully believed Sabo was killed by "the world". I don't think he fully knew what it meant but as his journey progresses he seems to witness what "the world" is. It's in Robin being persecuted. It's in Hatchan getting shot. It's in Kemie being enslaved. It's in Ace being executed for a crime of being born. Luffy ordering the destruction of WG flag is his first step in standing against "the world" and it is accumulated in his answer to Kaido when Kaido asks him what sort of world he wants. Luffy wants "the world" to be free
@@jeremysorejian He wants freedom you dumbass, you could be next on his punching bag list, be careful, cuz HE GON' BE KING OF THE PIRATESSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
There’s literally so many. I think that’s why there are so many one piece fans. There’s lots of fun and jokes and then you get moments of amazingness that make us all want to follow Luffy on his journey to king.
I like when on Fish Man Island right before they are about to fight Hordy's 100,000 fishman army, Luffy walks right in between Sanji and Zoro arguing about who is going to take out more enemies and proceeds to knockout 50,000 men with his conquerors haki.
The first moment is even more epic when you count luffy yelling to Robin saying she wants to live and she replies. The last one is even more epic when luffy punches kaido to the ground and says he will be the king of pirates.
I still think the Jet Gattling Luffy used at the end of his fight with Lucci was incredibly badass, both in animation, emotion, and impact. Love that scene.
@@superanimeniac he still didn't die when he pulled that shit either but instead the only good celestial dragon in the series who stepped into save her was executed instead
My favourite is the walk out onto the top of Onigashima and no hesitation walks up to Kaido and Big Mom. And he was serious the whole fight…until Nika ofc. And when he awakens Adv Conq and splits the sky against Kaido
Yeah, he is the type who doesn't give af, we may love any character in OP due to how Oda can make them badass with his fantastic creativity, but Luffy is the main protagonist for a reason, he is the best badass let's be honest, Luffy is a GOATed Anime protagonist.
why does no one talk about the don kreig fight when he has all those spikes on his arm and luffy punches him THROUGH the spikes anyways? i feel like that was the first instance where it was like “oh shit luffy’s badass and crazy”
that last one, looking like a real demon, ignoring kaito and big mom as if they aren't there... you can't be more badass. he does nothing, nothing at all. and looks completely badass.
i never realised but isnt luffy's outfit similar like he was in strong world when he beat shiki and is the first time we see his gear third go way over normal into giant territory , its always amazes me how oda is foreshadowing, that movie came out in 2009 only for a similar thing to play out a whole decade later
That show how Oda is growing with One Piece together. Luffy declares war witg the gaverment almost evry chapter and never be hunted by the govorements, while Ace was executed after a battle with Blackbeard whonwas absolutly nothing this time. Even as a son if the Pirate King, his father is a legend like Garp for rhe goverment(old generation). The killing of Ace look too unreal basdd on the whole anime right now....
There's 3 moment that hit different . Water 7 , sabaody, and marine ford. Cz in this arc we can see different side of luffy. Since the begining luffy describe strong, confident, and etc. But on this 3 arc luffy need to dealing with his crew, facing the Conquense of his act, being weak, fragile and hopeless of losing his brother
What ever you say the punch 👊 to celestial dragon remains most epic...none could see their eyes (celestials)and one pirate punch him lol after that borsalino shows and destroyed the crew.... remember the lvl of every epic bad ass moment... celestials are gods...none can touch the gods
You know after time skip and see so much race are in there, and see this scene i was just wondering if these three admiral are from long long leg race. 😂😂😂
Nami might die..... a d the staff of Zeus aka kinyin might be passed to luffy. Expelling anytime of image death cuz of luffy resistance... I really hate to see her go but the moneybking need his staff and he basically acts like the staff would...
The most satisfying was the last one when luffy ignored kaido and big mom. It clearly portrays his character where he places his friends above everything and it doesn't matter who is standing in front of him he is always ready to take them down. And this shows that he is king material
One under rated moment is when he pulls Katakuri into mirror world and doesnt hesitate to smash the mirror cutting himself off from the only way back onto his ship at the moment and making sure no matter what happens his crew is safe .
I second that
Epicness, and the final attack!
Confess the Lord Jesus Christ with your mouth and believe in your heart that He died for your sins on the cross and God raised Him from the dead on the third day; repent of your sins and be baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit!
Evidence for Jesus Christ’s existence, crucifixion, and disappearance from the tomb (He rose from it):
The Lord Jesus Christ did exist, gathered disciples, and was crucified and went missing from the tomb. To argue about wether He was taken from the grave or rose from it, is an argument a skeptic can make. Because well if you disregard the eye witness testimony of the disciples and there willingness to die for Christ, and humans won’t die for something they know is a lie, when Peter is pinned upside down to that cross, he could have said that it was a fake, but He didn’t because it wasn’t, what care would he have about death in this world if he knew for a fact he had assurance of a life in another, Jesus Christ did rise from the tomb and is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Now the evidence for the Lord Jesus Christ’s existence really isn’t hard to find a multitude of non-Christian scholars and historians mention Him within 150 years after the time of His life. One such is Tacitus a Roman historian who reported on emperor nero’s decision to blame the Christians for the fire that had destroyed rome in 64 AD. Tacitus wrote:
“Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome…”
In this Tacitus makes reference to not only Christians, but Christ calling Him Christus and confirming the Gospels going on to say that He suffered the extreme penalty (crucifixion) under the reign of Tiberius and by the sentence of Pontius Pilate, which like I said confirms the Gospels narrative.
Another important source of evidence about Jesus and early Christianity can be found in the letters of Pliny the Younger to Emperor Trajan. Pliny was the Roman governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. In one of his letters, dated around A.D. 112, he asks Trajan's advice about the appropriate way to conduct legal proceedings against those accused of being Christians. Pliny says that he needed to consult the emperor about this issue because a great multitude of every age, class, and sex stood accused of Christianity. At one point in his letter, Pliny relates some of the information he has learned about these Christians:
“They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food - but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.”
This passage provides a number of interesting insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christians. First, we see that Christians regularly met on a certain fixed day for worship. Second, their worship was directed to Christ, demonstrating that they firmly believed in His divinity. Furthermore, one scholar interprets Pliny's statement that hymns were sung to Christ, "as to a god", as a reference to the rather distinctive fact that, "unlike other gods who were worshipped, Christ was a person who had lived on earth." If this interpretation is correct, Pliny understood that Christians were worshipping an actual historical person as God! Of course, this agrees perfectly with the New Testament doctrine that Jesus was both God and man.
You may have heard of the scholar Flavius Josephus who mentioned James as being the brother of the Lord Jesus Christ, which matches what Paul said calling James “The Lord’s brother” and there is another document that Josephus may have written which goes:
“About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.”
Now it’s up to debate wether this is the entirely original document of what Josephus wrote, or if a Christian had edited it. But regardless he wrote about the Lord Jesus Christ. Wether it was negative or positive like the possible document is. Anyways there are many other statements, documents, letters, and writings of all sorts from the ancient world talking about the Lord Jesus Christ and there is not one question if He was a real person or if He was crucified and went missing from the grave. That is clear as day, He is a real person, was crucified, and went missing from the grave. And He did rise from the grave. And for more evidence of the Lord Jesus Christ, there’s the Bible and you see there is no evidence the Bible is corrupted, a lie, created by the Roman government, folktale. It is the recount of the Disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, now wether you want to believe it is up to you. And what profit was there in spreading Christianity, All the early Christian suffered persecution, beatings, and were killed. Another Scholar reported that James the Lord’s Brother was thrown off a building and then stoned to death for spreading the Gospel in Jerusalem. These people went to great lengths even giving their own lives for the Lord Jesus Christ. Amen!
@@SilentStone13 Confess the Lord Jesus Christ with your mouth and believe in your heart that He died for your sins on the cross and God raised Him from the dead on the third day; repent of your sins and be baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit!
Evidence for Jesus Christ’s existence, crucifixion, and disappearance from the tomb (He rose from it):
The Lord Jesus Christ did exist, gathered disciples, and was crucified and went missing from the tomb. To argue about wether He was taken from the grave or rose from it, is an argument a skeptic can make. Because well if you disregard the eye witness testimony of the disciples and there willingness to die for Christ, and humans won’t die for something they know is a lie, when Peter is pinned upside down to that cross, he could have said that it was a fake, but He didn’t because it wasn’t, what care would he have about death in this world if he knew for a fact he had assurance of a life in another, Jesus Christ did rise from the tomb and is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Now the evidence for the Lord Jesus Christ’s existence really isn’t hard to find a multitude of non-Christian scholars and historians mention Him within 150 years after the time of His life. One such is Tacitus a Roman historian who reported on emperor nero’s decision to blame the Christians for the fire that had destroyed rome in 64 AD. Tacitus wrote:
“Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome…”
In this Tacitus makes reference to not only Christians, but Christ calling Him Christus and confirming the Gospels going on to say that He suffered the extreme penalty (crucifixion) under the reign of Tiberius and by the sentence of Pontius Pilate, which like I said confirms the Gospels narrative.
Another important source of evidence about Jesus and early Christianity can be found in the letters of Pliny the Younger to Emperor Trajan. Pliny was the Roman governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. In one of his letters, dated around A.D. 112, he asks Trajan's advice about the appropriate way to conduct legal proceedings against those accused of being Christians. Pliny says that he needed to consult the emperor about this issue because a great multitude of every age, class, and sex stood accused of Christianity. At one point in his letter, Pliny relates some of the information he has learned about these Christians:
“They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food - but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.”
This passage provides a number of interesting insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christians. First, we see that Christians regularly met on a certain fixed day for worship. Second, their worship was directed to Christ, demonstrating that they firmly believed in His divinity. Furthermore, one scholar interprets Pliny's statement that hymns were sung to Christ, "as to a god", as a reference to the rather distinctive fact that, "unlike other gods who were worshipped, Christ was a person who had lived on earth." If this interpretation is correct, Pliny understood that Christians were worshipping an actual historical person as God! Of course, this agrees perfectly with the New Testament doctrine that Jesus was both God and man.
You may have heard of the scholar Flavius Josephus who mentioned James as being the brother of the Lord Jesus Christ, which matches what Paul said calling James “The Lord’s brother” and there is another document that Josephus may have written which goes:
“About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.”
Now it’s up to debate wether this is the entirely original document of what Josephus wrote, or if a Christian had edited it. But regardless he wrote about the Lord Jesus Christ. Wether it was negative or positive like the possible document is. Anyways there are many other statements, documents, letters, and writings of all sorts from the ancient world talking about the Lord Jesus Christ and there is not one question if He was a real person or if He was crucified and went missing from the grave. That is clear as day, He is a real person, was crucified, and went missing from the grave. And He did rise from the grave. And for more evidence of the Lord Jesus Christ, there’s the Bible and you see there is no evidence the Bible is corrupted, a lie, created by the Roman government, folktale. It is the recount of the Disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, now wether you want to believe it is up to you. And what profit was there in spreading Christianity, All the early Christian suffered persecution, beatings, and were killed. Another Scholar reported that James the Lord’s Brother was thrown off a building and then stoned to death for spreading the Gospel in Jerusalem. These people went to great lengths even giving their own lives for the Lord Jesus Christ. Amen!
@@1alopezpr Confess the Lord Jesus Christ with your mouth and believe in your heart that He died for your sins on the cross and God raised Him from the dead on the third day; repent of your sins and be baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit!
Evidence for Jesus Christ’s existence, crucifixion, and disappearance from the tomb (He rose from it):
The Lord Jesus Christ did exist, gathered disciples, and was crucified and went missing from the tomb. To argue about wether He was taken from the grave or rose from it, is an argument a skeptic can make. Because well if you disregard the eye witness testimony of the disciples and there willingness to die for Christ, and humans won’t die for something they know is a lie, when Peter is pinned upside down to that cross, he could have said that it was a fake, but He didn’t because it wasn’t, what care would he have about death in this world if he knew for a fact he had assurance of a life in another, Jesus Christ did rise from the tomb and is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Now the evidence for the Lord Jesus Christ’s existence really isn’t hard to find a multitude of non-Christian scholars and historians mention Him within 150 years after the time of His life. One such is Tacitus a Roman historian who reported on emperor nero’s decision to blame the Christians for the fire that had destroyed rome in 64 AD. Tacitus wrote:
“Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome…”
In this Tacitus makes reference to not only Christians, but Christ calling Him Christus and confirming the Gospels going on to say that He suffered the extreme penalty (crucifixion) under the reign of Tiberius and by the sentence of Pontius Pilate, which like I said confirms the Gospels narrative.
Another important source of evidence about Jesus and early Christianity can be found in the letters of Pliny the Younger to Emperor Trajan. Pliny was the Roman governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. In one of his letters, dated around A.D. 112, he asks Trajan's advice about the appropriate way to conduct legal proceedings against those accused of being Christians. Pliny says that he needed to consult the emperor about this issue because a great multitude of every age, class, and sex stood accused of Christianity. At one point in his letter, Pliny relates some of the information he has learned about these Christians:
“They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food - but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.”
This passage provides a number of interesting insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christians. First, we see that Christians regularly met on a certain fixed day for worship. Second, their worship was directed to Christ, demonstrating that they firmly believed in His divinity. Furthermore, one scholar interprets Pliny's statement that hymns were sung to Christ, "as to a god", as a reference to the rather distinctive fact that, "unlike other gods who were worshipped, Christ was a person who had lived on earth." If this interpretation is correct, Pliny understood that Christians were worshipping an actual historical person as God! Of course, this agrees perfectly with the New Testament doctrine that Jesus was both God and man.
You may have heard of the scholar Flavius Josephus who mentioned James as being the brother of the Lord Jesus Christ, which matches what Paul said calling James “The Lord’s brother” and there is another document that Josephus may have written which goes:
“About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.”
Now it’s up to debate wether this is the entirely original document of what Josephus wrote, or if a Christian had edited it. But regardless he wrote about the Lord Jesus Christ. Wether it was negative or positive like the possible document is. Anyways there are many other statements, documents, letters, and writings of all sorts from the ancient world talking about the Lord Jesus Christ and there is not one question if He was a real person or if He was crucified and went missing from the grave. That is clear as day, He is a real person, was crucified, and went missing from the grave. And He did rise from the grave. And for more evidence of the Lord Jesus Christ, there’s the Bible and you see there is no evidence the Bible is corrupted, a lie, created by the Roman government, folktale. It is the recount of the Disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, now wether you want to believe it is up to you. And what profit was there in spreading Christianity, All the early Christian suffered persecution, beatings, and were killed. Another Scholar reported that James the Lord’s Brother was thrown off a building and then stoned to death for spreading the Gospel in Jerusalem. These people went to great lengths even giving their own lives for the Lord Jesus Christ. Amen!
Somebody mentioned this under a Crunchyroll video: the first one isn't just Luffy being petty and destroying the WG flag just to piss them off. In drum island he showed that he _fully_ understands what it means to attack someone's flag. It means you are attacking everything they stand for.
He did that knowing _exactly_ what would happen next.
Facts !!!!
Luffy has probably the highest "in moment" battle/eq ...
Once he has a reason to fight he jus knows lol
It wasn't petty. He destroyed the WG flag because Robin was willing to sacrifice her safety for the crew because her enemy was the world government. Luffy ordering to destroy the WG flag was a message to Robin. That he'll take on the WG for his crew mates so much so that he made them his enemy with the destruction of the flag. Because the consequence of destroying it means an act of war against the WG
He also did it so that robin’s enemy became his enemy so she had no excuses to not return to the crew.
It's even deeper then that. At that moment Luffy fully believed Sabo was killed by "the world". I don't think he fully knew what it meant but as his journey progresses he seems to witness what "the world" is. It's in Robin being persecuted. It's in Hatchan getting shot. It's in Kemie being enslaved. It's in Ace being executed for a crime of being born.
Luffy ordering the destruction of WG flag is his first step in standing against "the world" and it is accumulated in his answer to Kaido when Kaido asks him what sort of world he wants.
Luffy wants "the world" to be free
That celestial dragon dude got sent back to the manga 💀💀
LMAOOO
That punch to a celestial dragon
Most satisfying 😊
He is the definition of a kid that hasn’t Been beaten enough
@@jeremysorejianI’m sure he’s much older then you plus he’s not a kid he’s 19 he’s a adult
@@LK_scpriters first I'm older
Second I'm talking about he's acting like someone who's never been told no.
@@jeremysorejian what every I don’t need ur yapping
@@jeremysorejian He wants freedom you dumbass, you could be next on his punching bag list, be careful, cuz HE GON' BE KING OF THE PIRATESSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hachi apologizing for being shot was just sad on another level man
There’s literally so many. I think that’s why there are so many one piece fans. There’s lots of fun and jokes and then you get moments of amazingness that make us all want to follow Luffy on his journey to king.
I like when on Fish Man Island right before they are about to fight Hordy's 100,000 fishman army, Luffy walks right in between Sanji and Zoro arguing about who is going to take out more enemies and proceeds to knockout 50,000 men with his conquerors haki.
Yo r😢
I mean is it's right 😊❤
fr man
Luffy is only afraid of his grandpa 😂
Also Nami
He's also afraid of big mom
To be fair, it's a very reasonable fear
But when it comes to ace execution, he punches his grandpa on face
@@Doodhpeda that day he was controlled by a higher power
The first moment is even more epic when you count luffy yelling to Robin saying she wants to live and she replies.
The last one is even more epic when luffy punches kaido to the ground and says he will be the king of pirates.
I still think the Jet Gattling Luffy used at the end of his fight with Lucci was incredibly badass, both in animation, emotion, and impact. Love that scene.
Luffy punching a celestial dragon is one of the most satisfying punch ever
4:06 Luffy so mad he used observation before knowing it
Luffy punched that celestial dragon so hard he died bro had some built up rage after seeing what he did to hatchi.
he didn't die. he pulls the same shit in the levelly arc with shirahoshi
This is why kids need to be punished
Imagine punch with haki 🥶
@@superanimeniac he still didn't die when he pulled that shit either but instead the only good celestial dragon in the series who stepped into save her was executed instead
@@theshiny_lotad4661 yup.
Because the CDs are cartoonishly evil
You can’t tell me luffy not best mc. I’m not saying strongest but he has to many iconic moments
Luffy turned that celestial dragon into an actual dragon judging by the distance he flew😂
Can’t believe you left out the most bad ass moment which is right after the timeskip when he dodged the Pacifista lasers and they exploded behind him
good take but where to put it? this list is actually really good already tho
My favourite is the walk out onto the top of Onigashima and no hesitation walks up to Kaido and Big Mom. And he was serious the whole fight…until Nika ofc. And when he awakens Adv Conq and splits the sky against Kaido
If u are now in vegapank arc you are truly one piece fan ❤
Egghead* arc but yea we there 😁🔥
No matter how many times I watch this, the celestial dragon scene was way above every other scene
So many epic moments! Thanks Oda, Toei, and crew!
And thanks to the maker of this video for sharing!
Let's be honest all of Luffy s walk is badass and cold
Yeah, he is the type who doesn't give af, we may love any character in OP due to how Oda can make them badass with his fantastic creativity, but Luffy is the main protagonist for a reason, he is the best badass let's be honest, Luffy is a GOATed Anime protagonist.
The best moment of luffy when he enters marineford at front of three admiral.
You *know* there was a childhood flashback during that Enies Lobby scene.
I love that scene after luffy defeated kaido in his gear 5 form and he just floats mid air as skyboats surrounds him. Gives goosebumps everytime
that kinemon scene deadass makes me cry every single time
why does no one talk about the don kreig fight when he has all those spikes on his arm and luffy punches him THROUGH the spikes anyways? i feel like that was the first instance where it was like “oh shit luffy’s badass and crazy”
Yooo you forgot the moment with Bellamy, i think its one of the first bad ass moments
That punch made made me rethink 😂 being rude
The scene with Kinnemon was the best for me
Episode no?
One shotting the pacifista after the timeskip. Insane
Anyone else kinda get Muerem vibes when they saw Luffy walk between Big Mom & Kaido like that?🐐
Thanks for the nostalgia the last one almost made me cry even if i wanted to see DA RED ROCK it was a good video✨
bro did the worst cuts possible
🤣😂🤣
Great video loved all the moments you chose. Never gets old seeing Luffy punch that celestial dragon.
that last one, looking like a real demon, ignoring kaito and big mom as if they aren't there... you can't be more badass.
he does nothing, nothing at all. and looks completely badass.
Luffy badass moments
When he flat out makes the ultimate mockery towards would be villains
I think the first time he uses conquerors haki and knocks out like 50k guys was pretty bad ass.
This needs updating. There's been more top 10 badass moments after this now
That moment with jar across the water guy slammed a massive feels moment into me
F*@K THE CELESTIAL DRAGONS BRUH EXCEPT FOR CORAZON HES THE GOAT
Looking back at the war. Why didn't Jimbei throw a big wave at the admirals. The water would of made them weak.
Because aokiji would freeze it
Garp isn't a fruit user. Only two would have been affected
@@gabemcknight1994 garp wasn't with them he's a vice admiral is was akainu aokiji and kizaru
yes
aokiji froze 2 tsunamis and u think a wave is enough XD
last clip still the goat
I love the moment when he punches the celestial dragon
0:39 Luffy be like: What symbol? *Sogeking burns it*
Bro that, tomodachi no kuni da always get me every timw
Luffy Dragonson. A true Viking.
im a big fan of luffy from the episode 1 until now im still waiting for him to become the pirate king
Props Luffy if nothing else.
at first clip , i betrayed naruto
in third clip , i betrayed db and all animes
Its the Rush of anime man. Lol. Listen to Rush an no band can compare. Same with one Piece, it's a masterpiece.
Its the rush of animel man😊
Don't abt others but luffy is genius in this kind of situations❤
Ending was lit❤
There are very few moments where Luffy is pissed off
The last part you should include *luffy smashing kaido's head*
Last one is my favorite ❤
Same man. Tug my heart strings
Num1 got to be have the icing on the cake
Luffy is an absolute chad
MINGOOOOOOO!!!!!!
i never realised but isnt luffy's outfit similar like he was in strong world when he beat shiki and is the first time we see his gear third go way over normal into giant territory , its always amazes me how oda is foreshadowing, that movie came out in 2009 only for a similar thing to play out a whole decade later
😱😱😱
a cena mais foda é o luffy enfrentando 3 almirantes sem nem ter haki somente com uma tora na mão kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
I loved luffy beat mingo like ringodingo😂😂 beatiful king kong K.O❤ love to see forth gear🤩
Goosebumps.
Did anybody notice that Luffy punched the celestial dragon the same way he punch kaido
You should've mentioned luffy clearing half of Hordy's troops
I love how Luffy just punches no shaningans
Luffy is beast 😊❤
Your forget when Luffy used conquerors haki at fishman island to drop out the 50,000 fishman 😎
Ahh yes the the one way luffy is bad ass is when there is a ring around his pupil
My head-canon is that Luffy's irises are actually white.
That show how Oda is growing with One Piece together. Luffy declares war witg the gaverment almost evry chapter and never be hunted by the govorements, while Ace was executed after a battle with Blackbeard whonwas absolutly nothing this time. Even as a son if the Pirate King, his father is a legend like Garp for rhe goverment(old generation). The killing of Ace look too unreal basdd on the whole anime right now....
There's 3 moment that hit different . Water 7 , sabaody, and marine ford. Cz in this arc we can see different side of luffy. Since the begining luffy describe strong, confident, and etc. But on this 3 arc luffy need to dealing with his crew, facing the Conquense of his act, being weak, fragile and hopeless of losing his brother
A pirate king isnt bother by two mere yonko
Very nice Video..but its missing a lot..
Ah yes. MS Photo video editor.
Somefans - luffy is childish
Luffy :
Great 😊❤❤❤
Luffy send the celestial dragon back to manga 🤣🤣🤣
You don’t show the bad ass moments you cut it too fast bro
I'm sorry but his most badass moment was clobbering the celestial dragon hands down.
And kuma watching him
What ever you say the punch 👊 to celestial dragon remains most epic...none could see their eyes (celestials)and one pirate punch him lol after that borsalino shows and destroyed the crew.... remember the lvl of every epic bad ass moment... celestials are gods...none can touch the gods
Luffy's attack was called King Kong gun and not Godzilla Gun
Oh no YOU DID NOT CUT LUFFY VS THE ADMIRALS AT THE PEAK MOMENT! NOOooo°°°why? 😲😤😒
what episode is this or is it a move
I'm thinking like, must the celestial not be dead after that punch.. they never experience pain or anything.
What if Black beards is not the enemy but the one who help Luffy take down the government
You know after time skip and see so much race are in there, and see this scene i was just wondering if these three admiral are from long long leg race. 😂😂😂
Luffy punching Bellamy
I wonder if Luffy is against globalism?
Ayooo why that Freemason symbol as the A 🤔🤔🤔👀👀👀
Where
Second really
❤Ido trafar law
8:40 hate the anime so much.
In the manga mingo instantly fall by a huge blow.
You gotta admit the prolonged beatdown is awesome though
9:13 >:D litterally
Nami might die..... a d the staff of Zeus aka kinyin might be passed to luffy. Expelling anytime of image death cuz of luffy resistance... I really hate to see her go but the moneybking need his staff and he basically acts like the staff would...
From which site can I watch the one piece???
Please suggest me
Crunchy Roll, it’s an app
yeaseyxeyeyey
First
Lucy not luffy lucy
The most satisfying was the last one when luffy ignored kaido and big mom. It clearly portrays his character where he places his friends above everything and it doesn't matter who is standing in front of him he is always ready to take them down. And this shows that he is king material