Unpacking Sharon's CHARGING Order Judgement: Another Nail In the Coffin!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 เม.ย. 2024
- Get our FREE Peace Keepers and Court Auditor courses here at peacekeepers.org.uk/
FREE Council Tax dispute challenge download here noc.peacekeepers.org.uk/
"Peace Keepers have been created to help secure a just and equitable existence., coming together to defend the peoples peace, to restore and preserve our inalienable rights, the highest standing in truth to be sovereign."
Nothing can be done to the prejudice of the people.
(Bill of Rights 1688)
Law is the people’s birth right.
(Act of Settlement 1700)
All are equal under the law.
No one is above the law.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
No one can knowingly impose their will upon any other without freewill.
Everybody has lawful excuse to the right of self defence.
---------------------------------
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976
Allowance is made for "fair use" purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Sharon's Judgement - www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/...
![[Vowel]물고기는 물에서 살아야 해🐟🤣Fish have to live in the water #funny](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3G9MH063Cx4/mqdefault.jpg)
Marc has done an excellent job of breaking my judgment down clearly... highlighting some real nuggets. Although the judge ruled in their favour i still feel there has been a considerable achievement in the judgment. A massive thank you to all that supported me on that nerve racking 1st court attendance...very much appreciated 💯🙏❤
You're a legend Sharon and an inspiration to others. Thank you for putting your head into the beasts mouth, as they say and taking this issue on, so that we can move forward in our quest to correct the decades of wrongs that have been done to us👏🥷
@tcrookes2803 many thanks! 🙏🥰💟
@davidgleeson9225 thank you...brilliant to see some one just down the road from me! 👏💪👌🥰
@@sharonkofa6858
Sharon I am employed by the council and they suspended me in march last year for in appropriate conduct and during the investigation that was all built on lies the threw in my withholding C.T. they was trying to make an example of me by threatening and punishing me .
I am 8n the due process of the 24 C.T. but the previous 2022 the liability order was produced 33 hours before the hearing
So I want to bring the case to court
I could try employment tribunal on constructive dismissal
But I would love to go to the high court
There is another part to the case whereby the council aided and abetted a criminal to create my suspension
It's quite a big case
I have it all documented
My only problem is I have no idea how to present it to the court
I am gonna write to them next week with plenty out of this video for the second time
And say within the month from now
Notice before action
How do I send the paperwork in I hope you don't mind me asking
Respectfully yours David
Hi Sharon, you guys have done an amazing job, but I see you guys may have glossed over a couple of clues the Judge gave away in his judgment. Happy to discuss with you if interested.
Good luck for Monday, May the judge do the right thing.
I think the dam may be breaking, lots of us worry about losing our house if it’s paid for.Thats the reason for hesitation .
We have to react now, it’s gotten serious.Not much time left.
Before playing in this field have a trusted party and put a charge for more than the equity over your property in their name( if you have a mortgage do not inform the lying lender, you don’t have to no matter what they say).
Well done!! Sharon you are awesome...Big respect 💪
So are we looking at a massive miscarriage of Justice here.
Watching this again over the next few days to really unpick it. Judgements will start to come thick and fast. Great progress again. Well done
Marc, you are such an amazing teacher! There is always so much I learn from you, no matter what the object of focus! Well done to Sharon, a proper light soldier for truth! Look at what huge success already, two years into this challenge :)
Not boring or long but absolutely fascinating, I'm going to share to my Facebook page.
Best of luck tomorrow Bakul
Brilliant Marc & co.
Once you loos the fear your world will change and you will have a total new outlook on life ,i lost my fear 6 years ago💪
Well done Sharon!! and thank you Mark for all and others very hard work, keep smiling Buckle (?). I'm on with Bristow and Sutor and Council at moment for evidence of liability order etc. Anyway WELL DONE ALL and EVERYONE!!
courts are scary to begin with but the knowledge is the key to all this lawyers dont get scared because they know it all
What about Halsburys Law 2011 deeming administrative courts to be illegal? No jury.
Absolutely brilliant!!!
So much information- I’ll be watching this about 5 times. 😅
I agree with you Brian- Marc’s powers of decoding and teaching are the best!
Thank you all.
Can’t wait for outcome of Bakul’s case.
I’m just a bit behind Sharon in terms of the process.
Received Interim charging order in January 24 and immediately rebutted- Caroline B helped with my submission. As they offer I requested the decision on whether allow council to proceed to Final CO be referred to a DJ. I’ve heard nothing. Tried phoning Civil National Bus Centre (wait was 45mins and still no answer) but emailed in the end last week asking for a report on where it is at. They ask for 10 days to respond which is Wednesday next week.
I’ve done 2 years of PK notices, three mag court appearances, I’ve done S111 with Hugh for Sept 23 hearing (we’ve just chased as no response) so I have sought remedy at each stage.
I can evidence with paperwork and recorded delivery and a recorded phone call that I asked the bailiff for proof of authority.
I’ve been through the council complaints process…having been subjected to dishonest behaviour by council no solution. Took it to ombudsman- no solution. Now they are going for charging order and I’ve requested that the DJ throw it out based on my own particular situation and we referenced Leighton judgement.
i asked a number of councils to give the details of the signature on the summons, none would
this monday morning feeling,,,is driving me out of my mind,,TITO SIMON. see you there,,,, one love
we know why there is no compensations for unlawful detention for a debt...
I am prepared to go to court win or loose ..i just think i have to do this to be part of the numbers to push it forward ..just wondering..is it possible to go through the process twice ? Such a shame Bakle had to go it alone ...Well done everyone
Best of luck; my experience is these Courts allow you to believe they are administrating justice, which they are not by their get out of jail card called interpretation . Before playing in this field have a trusted party and put a charge for more than the equity over your property in their name( if you have a mortgage do not inform the lying lender, you don’t have to no matter what they say).
Great video, great beakdown. Its Tuesday, and update if Buckles case was yesterday. Thanks
Great work guys
oldham metropolitan bolton council? surely that is not correct
When’s next court date I’ll come support
C05id ear infection: Try using nicotine chewing gum for a week. A doctor lost her hearing in one ear for two years and was told to try the gum. 3 days later, she had full hearing back. Try it.
SHARON CHEW A NICORET GUM for 10 mins 3 times a day
Hi Marc you mentioned in the video magistrates court rules, 66 b dose not state as you said I can only find this “(b)a minute or memorandum of every other proceeding or thing required by these rules or any other enactment to be so entered.” And it comes under the heading, Register of convictions. Am I looking in the wrong place ?
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/660d0c6cfb0f770011ec66dd/magistrates-courts-rules-1981-april-24.pdf Check this at 66B
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/660d0c6cfb0f770011ec66dd/magistrates-courts-rules-1981-april-24.pdf
66B.... a new section was added in a while ago after section 66....
@@marchorn466 hi Marc, thank you for replying. But on government legislation magistrates court rules 1981 there is no 66 b that I can find. Am I missing or looking in the wrong place. Sorry to be a pain and I / we appreciate all you are doing.
@@jeffbarrett1787 This is Section 66 as per the Mag/Court/Rules1981-
www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1981/552/rule/66/made
What happened to the original?
said liability instead of charging.... we are only human
@@marchorn466 Awesome thank you 🙏
Is Marc talking about Sam Melia case at 22 min? It’s true he had broken no law but got 2 years prison.So William Keyte is a nice bloke and trying his best but we saw what happened with this jury.
What do you mean about William Keyte?
@@PeaceKeepersOfficialChannelThe Guardian mocked him badly as a constitutional expert”, who is a supporter of a fringe campaign group called the New Chartist Movement.
He is a nice bloke doing his best and his view is that jury is the answer to the problems we have.I saw what happened to Sam and no longer think jury is an answer.Democracy seems to not work either.I worry that Labour will win and change the constitution and people will,believe they have the authority to do so.
@@bertibear1300 with all due respect to William, he really doesn't know half as much as Marc does. Also trial by jury is not good as the jury doesn't have to provide their reasons for decisions. If it was judge made then there would be a reasoned judgement which could be analysed.
@@PeaceKeepersOfficialChannelI saw Marc work about 3 years ago I Truro.and he really knows his stuff, agree.William is doing it from another angle but I agree , the jury seemed erratic and that was a very unjust decision without any explanation, as you say.
Why not just mention to the courts CT is only for non-domestic properties ?
Because we are trying to sort the root problem and the secretary of state has authority from parliament to change those definitions...
How is it non domestic.
It is not Non-Domestic, if your read the ''Textural Amendments in 2013 that
loophole was firmly shut.
The Textural Amendment [2013] says ''Domestic Dwelling'' -
F1 S. 3(4A) inserted (E.) (1.4.2013) by The Non-Domestic Rating and Council Tax (Definition of Domestic Property and Dwelling) (England) Order 2013 (S.I. 2013/468), arts. 1(1), 3
@@stevestephens8969 link to source document please....
@@marchorn466 Click on the 'Link' scroll down almost to the Bottom
of the page where it says ''Textural Changes'' then click on
that Link in that heading.
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1992/14/section/3
How can I email you I’ve just had council admit they printed and sent my summons on a email